Search Results
Found 4 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(270 days)
The PrecisePath Radiofrequency Puncture Generator and Footswitch (optional accessory) is indicated for use in general surgical procedures to cut and coagulate soft tissues.
The PrecisePath Radiofrequency (RF) Puncture Generator is indicated for use in general surgical procedures to cut and coagulate soft tissue. It is designed to be used by trained medical professionals, to provide radiofrequency (RF) current for creating controlled punctures with compatible Baylis RF devices in a monopolar mode. This continuous or pulsed RF current is output at a fixed frequency within 450 kHz to 480 kHz.
The PrecisePath Footswitch (optional accessory) may be used as an alternative to the on/off button on the generator user interface by which the user can start and stop the delivery of RF energy.
The PrecisePath RF Puncture Generator is compatible with separately cleared Baylis radiofrequency devices and connector cables, off-the-shelf return (dispersive) electrodes that meet or exceed IEC 60601-2-2:2017, and the PrecisePath footswitch (optional accessory).
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(149 days)
The PowerWire® 14 Radiofrequency Guidewire is intended to create a channel in totally occluded peripheral vessels 3 mm or greater, including vessels with stents.
PowerWire 14 Radiofrequency Guidewire is a sterile, single-use device used to deliver radiofrequency (RF) energy. It is shipped as a sterile device kit containing one (1) PowerWire 14 RF Guidewire and one (1) RFP-100A Connector Cable (separately cleared under K230571) sealed in a double compartment pouch, which is then placed inside a shelf box and then an outer cardboard box. The device is sterilized using ethylene oxide.
The device consists of a core wire surrounded by a polymer insulation. The wire connects to a radiofrequency puncture generator at the proximal end via a connector cable (K230571) and has an active tip at the distal end to deliver radiofrequency energy.
The PowerWire 14 Radiofrequency Guidewire must be used with a cleared generator such as the Baylis Radiofrequency Puncture Generator (Baylis RF Generator K122278) and connector cable such as RFP-100A Connector Cable (K230571). The connector cable connects the generator to the PowerWire 14 RF Guidewire to enable RF energy to be delivered from the Generator to the PowerWire 14 RF Guidewire.
The PowerWire 14 Radiofrequency Guidewire delivers RF energy in a monopolar mode between its distal electrode and a commercially available external Disposable Indifferent (Dispersive) Patch (DIP) Electrode.
The PowerWire 14 Radiofrequency Guidewire is available in both a 190 cm and 300 cm length with an outside diameter of 0.014". Each length is available in both straight and angled distal configurations which provide physicians with flexibility of choosing the most suitable guidewire for accessing target tissue in tortuous pathways in the body, with either straight or angled distal tips.
Once the occlusion is crossed, the PowerWire 14 Radiofrequency Guidewire can act as a rail for balloon catheters, or can be exchanged for other guidewires or devices cleared for peripheral interventional procedures. The PowerWire 14 Radiofrequency Guidewire is designed to be compatible with balloon catheters approved for use in peripheral interventional procedures.
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(188 days)
The PowerWire Radiofrequency Guidewire is intended to create a channel in totally occluded peripheral vessels 3 mm or greater, including vessels with stents.
PowerWire Radiofrequency Guidewire is a sterile, single-use device used to deliver radiofrequency (RF) energy. It is shipped as a sterile device kit containing one (1) PowerWire RF Guidewire and one (1) RFP-100A Connector Cable (separately cleared under K230571) sealed in a double compartment pouch, which is then placed inside a shelf box and then an outer cardboard box. The device is sterilized using ethylene oxide.
The device consists of a core wire surrounded by a polymer insulation. The wire connects to a radiofrequency puncture generator at the proximal end via a connector cable (K230571) and has an active tip at the distal end to deliver radiofrequency energy.
The PowerWire Radiofrequency Guidewire must be used with an approved Baylis Radiofrequency Puncture Generator (Baylis RF Generator K122278) and RFP-100A Connector Cable (K230571). The connector cable connects the RFP-100A BMC Radiofrequency Puncture Generator (RFP-100A Generator) to the PowerWire RF Guidewire to enable radiofrequency (RF) power to be delivered from the Generator to a PowerWire RF Guidewire. The PowerWire Radiofrequency Guidewire delivers radiofrequency (RF) power in a monopolar mode between its distal electrode and a commercially available external Disposable Indifferent (Dispersive) Patch (DIP) Electrode.
All models of the PowerWire Radiofrequency Guidewire have a usable length of 250cm and an outside diameter of 0.035". The various straight and curved distal configurations of the wires provide physicians with flexibility of choosing the most suitable guidewire for accessing target tissue in tortuous pathways in the body, with either straight or angled distal tips.
Once the occlusion is crossed, the PowerWire Radiofrequency Guidewire can act as a rail for balloon or stent catheters, or can be exchanged for other guidewires or devices cleared for peripheral interventional procedures. The PowerWire Radiofrequency Guidewire is designed to be compatible with most balloon and stent catheters approved for use in peripheral interventional procedures.
The provided FDA 510(k) summary for the PowerWire Radiofrequency Guidewire Kit (K232562) describes performance testing to demonstrate substantial equivalence to its predicate device (K101615). However, it does not detail acceptance criteria or specific study results in a format that directly addresses all your requested points for an AI/device performance study.
This document describes a medical device (a guidewire) and its physical and electrical characteristics, biocompatibility, and bench testing, rather than an AI algorithm's performance. Therefore, many of your questions regarding acceptance criteria and study design for AI performance are not directly applicable or answerable from this text.
I can, however, extract related information and highlight what is missing based on the document.
No AI/Algorithm Performance Study Described
It is important to note that this 510(k) summary does not describe a study involving an AI algorithm or software for diagnostic or therapeutic assistance. The device in question is a physical medical device (a guidewire) used for creating channels in occluded peripheral vessels. The "performance data" section focuses on physical, electrical, and biocompatibility testing of the guidewire itself, not on an algorithm's diagnostic accuracy or effectiveness.
Therefore, the following points address what can be inferred or what is explicitly missing from the provided text regarding your request for "acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" in the context of an AI device.
Reinterpretation for a Physical Device (PowerWire Radiofrequency Guidewire Kit)
If we interpret your request to apply to the physical device described, here's what we can gather:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document doesn't provide a direct "acceptance criteria" table with numerical values. Instead, it lists the types of tests conducted to ensure the device performs "compared to the predicate device" and that it "does not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness." The implicit acceptance criterion for most tests would be equivalence or non-inferiority to the predicate, or compliance with relevant standards.
| Test Type | Reported Device Performance / Goal |
|---|---|
| Dimensional | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Simulated use | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Tip flexibility | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Proximal stiffness | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Torqueability | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Torque strength | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Radiopacity | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Resistance to user manipulation | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Distal curve retention | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Peak Tensile force / Tip pull | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Surface defects | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Fracture resistance | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Damage with repeated flexing | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Arcing integrity | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Corrosion resistance | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Bending fatigue | Confirmed performance compared to the predicate device. |
| Electrical testing (IEC 60601-1, 60601-2-2) | Compliance with applicable clauses, including impedance, leakage, dielectric. |
| Biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1) | Verified biological safety: cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, acute systemic toxicity, pyrogenicity, hemocompatibility. |
| Device-Stent Interaction Testing | Confirmed performance for use in vessels with stents (simulated device use, thermal safety, embolization). |
| Literature Review (stent crossing) | No new questions of safety/effectiveness; acceptable benefit-risk profile. |
Missing: Specific quantitative acceptance criteria (e.g., "flexibility within X% of predicate," "tensile force > Y N") are not detailed in this summary. The general statement is "confirmed performance compared to the predicate device" or "compliance with standards."
2. Sample Size for Test Set and Data Provenance
- Test Set Sample Size: Not explicitly stated for each test. For physical device testing, "samples" typically refer to the number of guidewires tested, which is generally much smaller than patient data sets for AI.
- Data Provenance: Not applicable in the context of patient data for an AI study. The tests are benchtop, simulated use, and material characterization. "0-Day testing from the predicate device application (K101615) was leveraged for this device," suggesting some data was carried over.
3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth
- Not Applicable: This pertains to clinical evaluation or expert consensus for ground truth in diagnostic/AI studies, which is not described for a physical guidewire.
4. Adjudication Method
- Not Applicable: This relates to expert review processes for ground truth in diagnostic/AI studies.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
- No: This is a study type for evaluating AI assistance in diagnostic tasks, which is not relevant to this physical device.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study
- No: This is a study type for AI algorithm performance, not relevant to this physical device.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
- For Physical Device Tests: The "ground truth" is typically defined by engineering specifications, accepted international standards (e.g., ISO, IEC), and the performance characteristics of the predicate device. For biocompatibility, it's the established safe biological response. For mechanical tests, it's the measured physical properties against established limits.
8. Sample Size for Training Set
- Not Applicable: No AI algorithm is described, so there is no "training set."
9. How Ground Truth for Training Set Was Established
- Not Applicable: No AI algorithm is described.
Ask a specific question about this device
(90 days)
The intended use of the RFP-100A Connector Cable (Single Use) is to connect the RFP-100A Generator to separately cleared compatible RF devices.
Not Found
This document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a medical device called the "RFP-100A Connector Cable (Single Use)". It indicates that the device has been found substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device.
Crucially, this document does not include information about acceptance criteria, performance studies, or ground truth establishment for an AI/ML device.
The device described, a connector cable, is a passive component used to connect two other cleared medical devices (a generator and RF devices). Its function is likely to transmit electrical signals, and its acceptance criteria would focus on electrical safety, biocompatibility, mechanical integrity, and compatibility with the specified devices, rather than the kind of performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, AUC) typically associated with AI/ML-driven diagnostic or prognostic tools.
Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information (table of acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, ground truth types, or training set details) from the provided text because it is not relevant to the type of device being discussed.
To provide the information you've requested, I would need a 510(k) summary or a similar document for an AI/ML-enabled medical device that performs a diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic function.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1