Search Results
Found 191 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(96 days)
The Arthrex BioComposite 2.0 mm SutureTak Suture Anchor is intended for suture (soft tissue) fixation to bone in the elbow, shoulder, hand/wrist, foot/ankle, knee, and hip in the following procedures:
- Elbow: Biceps Tendon Reattachment, Ulnar or Radial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction
- Shoulder: Rotator Cuff Repair, Bankart Repair, SLAP Lesion Repair, Biceps Tenodesis, Acromio-Clavicular Separation Repair, Deltoid Repair, Capsular Shift or Capsulolabral Reconstruction
- Hand/Wrist: Scapholunate Ligament Reconstruction, Carpal Ligament Reconstruction, Repair/Reconstruction of collateral ligaments, Repair of Flexor and Extensor Tendons at the PIP, DIP, and MCP joints for all digits, digital tendon transfers
- Foot/Ankle: Lateral Stabilization, Medial Stabilization, Achilles Tendon Repair, Metatarsal Ligament Repair, Hallux Valgus Reconstruction, Digital Tendon Transfers, Mid-Foot Reconstruction
- Knee: Medial Collateral Ligament Repair, Lateral Collateral Ligament Repair, Patellar Tendon Repair, Posterior Oblique Ligament Repair, Iliotibial Band Tenodesis
- Hip: Acetabular Labral Repair and Reconstruction
The Arthrex PEEK Mini Hip SutureTak is intended to be used for suture (soft tissue) fixation to bone in the hip. Specifically, Acetabular Labral Repair and Reconstruction.
The fundamental technology of the Arthrex SutureTak Suture Anchor is that the Arthrex SutureTak Suture Anchors are "hard-bodied" fixation devices with anchors manufactured from either BioComposite or PEEK material. The subject anchors are preassembled to suture manufactured from UHMWPE and Polyester. The anchor is first impacted into a pilot hole. Once the anchor is set, the suture is passed around the soft tissue and is fixated via its surgical technique. The devices are provided sterile, are single-use, and are packaged in a dual barrier packaging configuration.
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(111 days)
The Arthrex Synergy Vision imaging system is intended to provide visible light imaging in a variety of diagnostic and surgical procedures, including laparoscopy, orthopedic, plastic surgery, sinuscopy, spine, urology, and procedures within the thoracic cavity. The device is also intended to be used as an accessory for microscopic surgery.
The Arthrex Synergy Vision imaging system is indicated for use to provide real-time visible and near-infrared fluorescence imaging. Upon intravenous administration and use of ICG consistent with its approved label, the system enables surgeons to perform open and minimally invasive surgery using standard endoscope visible light as well as visualization of vessels, blood flow and related tissue perfusion, and at least one of the major extra-hepatic bile ducts (cystic duct, common bile duct or common hepatic duct), using near-infrared imaging. Fluorescence imaging of biliary ducts with the Arthrex Synergy Vision imaging system is intended for use with standard of care white light, and when indicated, intraoperative cholangiography. The device is not intended for standalone use for biliary duct visualization. Additionally, the system is indicated for fluorescence imaging of blood flow and tissue perfusion before, during, and after vascular, gastrointestinal, organ transplant, plastic, micro- and reconstructive surgical procedures.
Upon interstitial administration and use of ICG consistent with its approved label, the Arthrex Synergy Vision imaging system is used to perform intraoperative fluorescence imaging and visualization of the lymphatic system, including lymphatic vessels and lymph nodes.
Upon administration and use of pafolacianine consistent with its approved label, the Arthrex Synergy Vision imaging system is used to perform intraoperative fluorescence imaging of tissues that have taken up the drug.
The Arthrex NanoNeedle Scope when used with the Synergy Vision imaging system is intended to be used as an endoscopic video camera to provide visible light imaging in a variety of endoscopic diagnostic and surgical procedures, including laparoscopy, orthopedic, plastic surgery, sinuscopy, spine, urology, and procedures within the thoracic cavity. The device is also intended to be used as an accessory for microscopic surgery. For pediatric patients, the Arthrex NanoNeedle Scope is indicated for laparoscopy and orthopedic procedures.
The Arthrex 4K Open Scope 0° NIR is intended to be used as an accessory with the Synergy Vision imaging system to provide visible light imaging and near-infrared fluorescence imaging during open surgical procedures.
The Synergy Vision Imaging System includes a camera control unit (CCU) console, camera head, scope, and a laser light source. The system provides real-time visible light and near-infrared (NIR) illumination and imaging.
The Synergy Vision Imaging System uses an integrated LED light to provide visible light illumination and imaging of a surgical site. For NIR imaging, the system interacts with the laser light source to visualize the presence of a fluorescence contrast agent, indocyanine green (ICG) and pafolacianine. The contrast agent fluoresces when illuminated through the scope with NIR excitation light from the laser light source and the fluorescent response is then imaged with the camera, processed, and displayed on a monitor.
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(36 days)
The Arthrex FiberTak Suture Anchor is intended for fixation of suture (soft tissue) to bone in the elbow, shoulder, hand/wrist, foot/ankle, knee, and hip the following procedures:
- Elbow: Biceps Tendon Reattachment, Ulnar or Radial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction
- Shoulder: Rotator Cuff Repair, Bankart Repair, SLAP Lesion Repair, Biceps Tenodesis, Acromio-Clavicular Separation Repair, Deltoid Repair, Capsular Shift or Capsulolabral Reconstruction
- Hand/Wrist: Scapholunate Ligament Reconstruction, Repair/Reconstruction of collateral ligaments, Repair of Flexor and Extensor Tendons at the PIP, DIP, and MCP joints for all digits, digital tendon transfers, Carpal Ligament Reconstruction and Carpometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty (basal thumb joint arthroplasty)
- Foot/Ankle: Lateral Stabilization, Medial Stabilization, Achilles Tendon Repair, Metatarsal Ligament Repair, Hallux Valgus Reconstruction, Digital Tendon Transfers, Mid-Foot Reconstruction
- Knee: Medial Collateral Ligament Repair, Lateral Collateral Ligament Repair, Patellar Tendon Repair, Posterior Oblique Ligament Repair, Iliotibial Band Tenodesis
- Hip: Acetabular Labral Repair and Reconstruction
The fundamental technology of the Arthrex FiberTak Suture Anchors is that the Arthrex FiberTak Anchors are "all-suture" soft-tissue fixation devices with a push-in design. The subject device is FiberTak Anchor with 1.3 mm SutureTape (White/Blue) and is a knotted FiberTak with a Polyester Sheath and a Polyester/UHMWPE repair suture.
The subject device is preloaded on a disposable inserter, which facilities deployment. The subject anchor and connected sutures are impacted into a pilot hole. The suture is then manually tensioned to set the anchor by "bulging/bunching" the suture sleeve within the pilot hole. Once the anchor is set, the suture is passed around the soft tissue and is fixated via its surgical technique. The device is provided sterile and is intended for single-use.
The provided FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter concerns a physical medical device (suture anchor) and not an AI/Software as a Medical Device (SaMD). Therefore, the questions related to AI acceptance criteria, training sets, ground truth establishment by experts, MRMC studies, and stand-alone algorithm performance are not applicable to this document.
The clearance for the Arthrex FiberTak Suture Anchor is based on substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices, primarily demonstrated through performance testing rather than clinical study data from image analysis or diagnostic tasks.
Here's an analysis of the provided text based on the nature of the device:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
| Acceptance Criteria (Inferred) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Mechanical Performance: Equivalent or superior mechanical properties (e.g., pull-out strength, fixation strength) to predicate devices in relevant anatomical applications for soft tissue-to-bone fixation. | Straight Pull testing (method based on ASTM F3690) was conducted.The test data demonstrates that the subject device performs statistically equivalent to the predicate and reference devices for the intended indications for use. |
| Biocompatibility: Materials are biocompatible for implantation. | Not explicitly detailed in the provided text, but assumed to be part of the predicate device's established safety profile, or covered by material specifications not included here. |
| Sterility: Device is sterile for single-patient use. | The device is provided sterile and is intended for single-use. |
| Design/Technology Equivalence: Fundamental technology, design, and operating principles are equivalent to predicate devices. | The subject Arthrex FiberTak Suture Anchor is identical to the primary predicate Arthrex FiberTak Suture Anchor except that it is seeking the additional Acetabular Labral Reconstruction indication.The subject Arthrex FiberTak Suture Anchor and reference device Smith & Nephew Microraptor Knotless Suture Anchor have similar technologies.Any differences between the subject and predicate devices are considered minor and do not raise any new or different questions concerning safety or effectiveness. |
| New Indication Equivalence: The new indication (Acetabular Labral Reconstruction) is supported by equivalence to a predicate/reference device that already has this indication. | The reference device, Smith & Nephew Microraptor Knotless Suture Anchor, has Acetabular Labrum Reconstruction indication, which is equivalent to the indication Arthrex is seeking. |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):
- Sample Size: Not specified in the provided text. The document states "Straight Pull testing... was conducted." For mechanical testing, the "sample size" would refer to the number of anchors tested, which is typically outlined in the test report referenced (ASTM F3690).
- Data Provenance: Not specified. It's likely that the testing was performed in a lab setting (in vitro) to regulatory standards (ASTM F3690). This is not retrospective or prospective clinical data.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- Not Applicable. This is a physical device clearance based on mechanical testing and substantial equivalence, not on diagnostic accuracy established by expert consensus. There is no "ground truth" established by experts in the context of image interpretation or diagnosis.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- Not Applicable. As per point 3, there is no expert panel or image interpretation data that would require adjudication.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- Not Applicable. This is not an AI-assisted diagnostic device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not Applicable. This is not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- The "ground truth" in this context refers to the objective mechanical performance characteristics of the device (e.g., force at failure, displacement) as measured by standardized engineering tests (e.g., ASTM F3690). The "truth" is derived from these empirical measurements, not expert interpretation of clinical data.
8. The sample size for the training set:
- Not Applicable. There is no "training set" as this is not a machine learning model.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not Applicable. There is no "training set" or "ground truth" in the context of machine learning for this device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(56 days)
The Arthrex Spine Compression FT Screws are intended to stabilize the spine as an aid to fusion through immobilization of the facet joints, either through bilateral transfacet fixation, or unilateral transfacet fixation when used contralateral to pedicle screw fixation. The Arthrex Spine Compression FT Screws are intended to be used with or without bone graft, at a single or multiple levels, from C2 to S1, for treatment of any or all of the following: pseudoarthrosis and failed previous fusions which are symptomatic or which may cause secondary instability or deformity; spondylolisthesis; spondylolysis; degenerative disc disease (DDD) as defined by neck and/or back pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by radiographic studies; degeneration of the facets with instability and trauma including spinal fractures and/or dislocations. The Arthrex Spine Compression FT Screw is also indicated for fracture fixation of small bones and bone fragments including pars interarticularis and odontoid. The fracture fixation of pars interarticularis is indicated for the adult and adolescent population (12 to 21 years of age).
The Arthrex Spine Compression FT Screws are headless, threaded, cannulated titanium implants that are available in a variety of sizes. The screws have a fully threaded screw shaft with a tapering head and a variable-stepped thread pitch that allows the screw the ability to provide compression and stability between bony fragments or joints.
The provided FDA approval letter heavily focuses on the regulatory and administrative aspects of the device, primarily confirming its substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on non-clinical performance data. It does not contain information about a study proving specific acceptance criteria related to AI/algorithm performance, human reader improvement with AI assistance (MRMC), or detailed clinical trial information.
The document discusses the mechanical performance of the Arthrex Spine Compression FT Screw, which is a physical medical device (a screw for spinal fixation), not a software or AI-driven diagnostic tool. Therefore, many of the requested points (e.g., sample size for test set, ground truth for test set, number of experts, MRMC study, standalone algorithm performance, training set details) are not applicable to the type of device described in this FDA letter.
However, based on the information provided, I can infer and state what is available regarding the device's performance demonstration:
Device: Arthrex Spine Compression FT Screw
Purpose of Submission: To obtain clearance for the Arthrex Spine Compression FT Screws for spine indications, demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices.
Type of Device: A physical, implantable medical device (a screw for spinal fixation), not an AI/software diagnostic tool.
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (Non-Clinical)
Since this is a physical device, the "acceptance criteria" discussed are related to its mechanical performance and safety for implantation and MR compatibility, not diagnostic accuracy or AI performance.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Specific Test/Standard | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical Performance | Axial Push-out (per ASTM F2193 Annex 4) | Demonstrated performance substantially equivalent to predicate devices. |
| Static Cantilever Bending (per ASTM F2193 Annex 4) | Demonstrated performance substantially equivalent to predicate devices. | |
| MR Compatibility | Magnetically Induced Displacement Force | Maximum mass of subject device is less than worst-case predicate, thus not representing a new worst-case. |
| Magnetically Induced Torque | Maximum mass of subject device is less than worst-case predicate, thus not representing a new worst-case. | |
| Radiofrequency (RF) Induced Heating (per ASTM F2182-19) | Evaluated, specific results not detailed but implied acceptable for clearance. | |
| Image Artifact (per ASTM F2119-13) | Evaluated, specific results not detailed but implied acceptable for clearance. |
2. Sample Size for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
- Sample Size: Not explicitly stated for mechanical or MR compatibility testing. These are typically bench tests following established standards, not patient-based test sets.
- Data Provenance: The studies are described as "non-clinical testing" conducted by Arthrex. This implies in-house laboratory testing. Not applicable to country of origin, retrospective/prospective data as these are not clinical trials.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications:
- Not applicable. The "ground truth" for mechanical and MR compatibility tests is defined by the test standards (e.g., ASTM F2193, F2182-19, F2119-13) and physical measurements, not by expert interpretation.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
- Not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are used for clinical image interpretation, not for bench testing of mechanical properties.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done:
- No. An MRMC study is designed to assess human reader performance, typically with and without AI assistance, for diagnostic tasks. This device is a surgical implant, not a diagnostic AI tool.
6. If a Standalone (algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not applicable. This is not an algorithm or AI device.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:
- For mechanical testing: Engineering specifications and direct physical measurements according to validated test methods (ASTM standards).
- For MR compatibility: Measurements against established safety limits and comparisons to predicate devices, verified through standardized test methods (ASTM standards) and in-vivo electromagnetic simulation.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:
- Not applicable. This device does not use a training set as it is not an AI/machine learning product.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established:
- Not applicable.
Important Note:
The letter does mention, "A clinical literature summary was provided to support the expansion of indications." This indicates that existing clinical data from published literature was used to support the broadened indications for use of the device, rather than a new, dedicated clinical trial being conducted for this 510(k) submission. However, details of this literature review are not provided in the letter.
Ask a specific question about this device
(176 days)
Indications remain unchanged from pre-pandemic COVID-19 vaccines for use in individuals 6 months of age and older.
HPE 8570B 50 Ohm Programmable Step Attenuator, DC to 18 GHz
This FDA clearance letter for the Arthrex Spine Endoscope (K243602) does not contain information about the development and validation of an AI/ML device. Instead, it describes a traditional medical device submission for an endoscope.
The letter explicitly states on Page 6: "The Arthrex Spine Endoscope did not require animal testing or human clinical studies to support the determination of substantial equivalence." and "All verification activities were successfully completed to confirm the subject device meets product requirements and design specifications established for the device." This indicates that the clearance was based on non-clinical bench testing and comparison to a predicate device, typical for traditional medical devices, rather than a novel AI/ML algorithm requiring extensive clinical validation with ground truth, expert readers, and comparative effectiveness studies.
Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information about acceptance criteria and study proving an AI/ML device meets those criteria from this document. The document pertains to a physical endoscope, not an AI/ML system.
If you have a different document pertaining to an AI/ML medical device, please provide it, and I will do my best to extract the requested information.
Ask a specific question about this device
(55 days)
The Arthrex Synergy Vision Endoscopic Imaging System is intended to be used as an endoscopic video camera to provide visible light imaging in a variety of endoscopic diagnostic and surgical procedures, including laparoscopy, orthopedic, plastic surgery, sinuscopy, spine, urology, and procedures within the thoracic cavity. The device is also intended to be used as an accessory for microscopic surgery.
The Arthrex Synergy Vision Endoscopic Imaging System is indicated for use to provide real time endoscopic visible and near-infrared fluorescence imaging. Upon intravenous administration and use of ICG consistent with its approved label, the system enables surgeons to perform minimally invasive surgery using standard endoscope visible light as well as visualization of vessels, blood flow and related tissue perfusion, and at least one of the major extra-hepatic bile ducts (cystic duct, common bile duct or common hepatic duct), using near-infrared imaging. Fluorescence imaging of biliary ducts with the Arthrex Synergy Vision Endoscopic Imaging System is intended for use with standard of care white light, and when indicated, intraoperative cholangiography. The device is not intended for standalone use for biliary duct visualization.
Upon interstitial administration and use of ICG consistent with its approved label, the Arthrex Synergy Vision Endoscopic Imaging System is used to perform intraoperative fluorescence imaging and visualization of the lymphatic system, including lymphatic vessels and lymph nodes.
Upon administration and use of pafolacianine consistent with its approved label, the Arthrex Synergy Vision Endoscopic Imaging System is used to perform intraoperative fluorescence imaging of tissues that have taken up the drug.
The Arthrex NanoNeedle Scope when used with the Synergy Vision Endoscopic Imaging System is intended to be used as an endoscopic video camera to provide visible light imaging in a variety of endoscopic diagnostic and surgical procedures, including laparoscopy, orthopedic, plastic surgery, sinuscopy, spine, urology, and procedures within the thoracic cavity. The device is also intended to be used as an accessory for microscopic surgery. For pediatric patients, the Arthrex NanoNeedle Scope is indicated for laparoscopy and orthopedic procedures.
The Arthrex Synergy Vision Endoscopic Imaging System includes a camera control unit (CCU) console, camera heads, endoscopes, and a laser light source. The system provides real-time visible light and near-infrared (NIR) illumination and imaging.
The Arthrex Synergy Vision Endoscopic Imaging System uses an integrated LED light to provide visible light illumination and imaging of a surgical site. For NIR imaging, the system interacts with the laser light source to visualize the presence of a fluorescence contrast agent, indocyanine green (ICG) and pafolacianine. The contrast agent fluoresces when illuminated through the laparoscope with NIR excitation light from the laser light source and the fluorescent response is then imaged with the camera, processed, and displayed on a monitor.
The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter and summary for the Arthrex Synergy Vision Endoscopic Imaging System (K250728) describes the device and its indications for use, but does not contain the detailed information necessary to fully answer all the questions regarding acceptance criteria and a study that proves the device meets those criteria.
Specifically, the document states: "The Arthrex Synergy Endoscopic Imaging System did not require animal testing or human clinical studies to support the determination of substantial equivalence." This implies that performance data demonstrating device capabilities against specific acceptance criteria (beyond general functional testing and compliance with standards) were not generated through clinical studies or animal studies for this submission.
However, based on the information provided, here's what can be inferred and what is missing:
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (Inferred/Missing)
Since no human or animal clinical studies were performed, there appears to be no specific clinical performance acceptance criteria listed in this document. The "Performance Data" section primarily focuses on engineering and regulatory compliance testing.
| Acceptance Criterion | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Functional Performance (General) | "The test results confirm the subject device met Arthrex product requirements and design specifications for the device." |
| Biocompatibility | "Leveraged from the biocompatibility testing... of the additional predicate devices, as there were no modifications made to the subject device... that would affect the biocompatibility..." |
| Sterility | "Leveraged from the... sterilization validation of the additional predicate devices, as there were no modifications made to the subject device... that would affect the... sterility of the device." |
| Electrical Safety (EMT) | "The test results confirm the subject device conforms with EMT safety... standards." |
| Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) | "The test results confirm the subject device conforms with... EMC standards." |
| Software Performance | "Software testing was conducted and documentation was provided in this submission. The test results confirm the Arthrex software updates met product requirements and design specifications established for the device." |
| Image Resolution | (Implicitly met by technical specifications matching predicate) 3840 x 2160, 400 x 400 (Nano), 720 x 720 (Nano) |
| Frame Rate | (Implicitly met by technical specifications matching predicate) 60 fps, 30 fps (Nano) |
| NIR Wavelengths/Detection | (Implicitly met by technical specifications matching predicate) Excitation Wavelength: 785 nm, Detection Bandwidth: 810 – 940 nm |
| Clinical Performance (e.g., Sensitivity, Specificity for specific disease/task) | NOT APPLICABLE / NOT PROVIDED. The document explicitly states no human or animal studies were required for substantial equivalence. Therefore, there are no reported clinical performance metrics like sensitivity or specificity. |
Study Details (Based on Provided Document and Inferences)
-
Sample Size used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Test set sample size: Not applicable for clinical performance as the document explicitly states: "The Arthrex Synergy Endoscopic Imaging System did not require animal testing or human clinical studies to support the determination of substantial equivalence."
- Data provenance: Not applicable for clinical performance. The data provenance for engineering tests (e.g., EMT, EMC, software) would be internal Arthrex testing labs.
-
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- Not applicable as no human clinical studies establishing ground truth for clinical performance were conducted for this submission. Ground truth for engineering tests is established through technical specifications and industry standards.
-
Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- Not applicable for clinical performance.
-
If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- No MRMC study was done. The device description does not indicate AI assistance features. The system is described as an endoscopic video camera and imaging system, not an AI-powered diagnostic aide.
-
If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not applicable. The device is hardware (imaging system) with associated software, not a standalone algorithm.
-
The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- For the engineering and regulatory compliance tests: Ground truth was established by adherence to design specifications, industry standards (e.g., for biocompatibility, sterility, EMT, EMC), and internal product requirements.
- For clinical performance (e.g., diagnostic accuracy for a specific disease): No such ground truth was established or presented as no clinical studies were performed.
-
The sample size for the training set:
- Not applicable, as this device does not appear to utilize machine learning for clinical interpretation or outcome prediction in a way that requires a "training set" in the context of AI/ML models. "Software testing" refers to verification against technical requirements, not AI model training.
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not applicable for the same reasons as #7.
Summary of Key Takeaways from the Document:
The 510(k) clearance for the Arthrex Synergy Vision Endoscopic Imaging System (K250728) is based on substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices (K241361 and K243008). The justification for this clearance relies heavily on:
- Similar intended use and indications for use.
- Similar technological characteristics (e.g., components, imaging modes, specifications).
- Successful completion of engineering and regulatory compliance testing (e.g., functional testing, biocompatibility, sterility, EMT, EMC, software).
Crucially, the document explicitly states that no animal testing or human clinical studies were required or performed to demonstrate the device meets acceptance criteria related to clinical performance. This means the clearance is not based on a study proving diagnostic accuracy or clinical effectiveness in patients, but rather on the device's technological similarity and safety/performance in a non-clinical, engineering test environment compared to previously cleared devices.
Ask a specific question about this device
(18 days)
The Arthrex 4.75 mm Double Loaded Knotless Corkscrew Suture Anchor is intended for fixation of suture (soft tissue) to bone in the shoulder. Specifically, rotator cuff repairs.
The Arthrex 4.75 mm Double Loaded Knotless Corkscrew Suture Anchor is a fully threaded knotless suture anchor that is pre-loaded on a disposable inserter with Arthrex sutures. The anchor may be manufactured from either BioComposite (PLLA/betaTCP TriCalcium Phosphate) or PEEK (Polyether-ether-ketone). The Arthrex 4.75 mm Double Loaded Knotless Corkscrew Suture Anchor is provided sterile (Ethylene Oxide), single-use, and is packaged in a single-pack or 5-pack.
The provided document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for a medical device. It does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria in the context of an AI/ML medical device.
The "Performance Data" section of the 510(k) summary (page 4) states:
"Tensile (pull-out) testing was conducted on the proposed Arthrex 4.75 mm Doubled Loaded Knotless Corkscrew Suture Anchor submitted in this Special 510(k). The test data demonstrates that the proposed device performs statistically equivalent to the predicate device for the intended indications for use. Bacterial endotoxin per EP 2.6.14/USP <85> was conducted to demonstrate that the device meets pyrogen limit specifications."
This indicates that mechanical and biocompatibility tests were performed, but no acceptance criteria or detailed study results for an AI/ML device performance are present. The document is for a physical medical device (suture anchor), not an AI/ML-driven diagnostic or therapeutic tool. Therefore, the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, expert ground truth, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, or standalone algorithm performance for an AI/ML system cannot be extracted from this document.
Ask a specific question about this device
(118 days)
The Arthrex NanoScope System is intended to be used as an endoscopic video camera to provide visible light imaging in a variety of endoscopic diagnostic and surgical procedures, including laparoscopy, orthopedic, plastic surgery, sinuscopy, spine, and urology. The device is also intended to be used as an accessory for microscopic surgery.
For pediatric patients, the Arthrex NanoScope System is indicated for use in laparoscopy and orthopedic procedures.
The Arthrex NanoScope System provides real-time visible light illumination and imaging. The system includes a non-sterile reusable camera control unit (CCU) console and sterile disposable camera handpieces. The system integrates high-definition camera technology, LED lighting, and an imaging management system into a single console with touchscreen interface.
The provided document describes the Arthrex NanoScope System, a medical device used for endoscopic video imaging. However, this document does not contain information about a study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria related to a specific performance metric (e.g., accuracy, sensitivity, specificity) for an AI/ML algorithm that identifies or classifies something.
The performance data section (pages 5 and 6) outlines various non-clinical bench testing, including:
- Biocompatibility testing: Performed according to ISO 10993 standards.
- Electrical, Mechanical, and Thermal (EMT) safety testing: Performed according to ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1 and IEC 60601-2-18 standards.
- Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) testing: Performed according to IEC 60601-1-2 standards.
- Software testing: Performed according to FDA guidance and IEC 62304.
- Design verification testing: Included inspection, engineering analysis, and functional testing.
These tests confirm the device's conformance to safety, performance, and software quality standards relevant to an endoscopic imaging system, rather than demonstrating the performance of an AI model against specific clinical metrics like sensitivity or specificity. The submission aims to expand indications and report software and device modifications, relying on equivalence to predicate devices rather than a de novo clinical study proving AI performance.
Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets those criteria in the context of an AI/ML algorithm's performance, as the provided text does not describe such a study. The document explicitly states: "The Arthrex NanoScope System did not require animal testing or human clinical studies to support the determination of substantial equivalence." This further indicates that no clinical performance study, particularly one involving AI/ML and human-in-the-loop or standalone performance, was conducted as part of this submission.
Ask a specific question about this device
(101 days)
The Arthrex VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screws (2.7 mm solid) are intended to be used in a plate-screw system for internal bone fixation for bone fractures, fusions, osteotomies and non-unions in the ankle, foot, hand, wrist, tibia, fibula, femur, pelvis, acetabulum, metacarpals, metatarsals, humerus, radius, ulna, calcaneus, and clavicle. When used with a plate, the screw may be used with the Arthrex Low Profile Plate, Small Fragment Plates, Distal Extremity Plates, Mesh Plates (2.7) and Distal Radius Plates.
The Arthrex VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screws (3.5 mm and larger, solid) are intended to be used in a plate-screw system for internal bone fixation for bone fractures, fusions, Osteotomies and non-unions in the ankle, foot, hand, wrist, clavicle, scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, tibia, calcaneus, pelvis, acetabulum, metacarpals, metatarsals, femur and fibula. When used with a plate, the screws may be used with the Arthrex Low Profile Plate, Small Fragment Plates, Fracture Plates, Distal Extremity Plates, Distal Radius Plates, Humeral Fracture Plates, Osteotomy Plates, and Ankle Fusion Plates.
The Arthrex VAL Screws (2.7 mm solid) are intended to be used as stand-alone bone screws, or in a plate-screw system for internal bone fixation for bone fractures, fusions, osteotomies and non-unions, in the ankle, foot, hand, wrist, tibia, fibula, femur, pelvis, acetabulum, metacarpals, metatarsals, humerus, radius, ulna, calcaneus, and clavicle. When used with a plate, the screw may be used with the Arthrex Low Profile Plate, Small Fragment Plates, Distal Extremity Plates, Mesh Plates (2.7-3.0) and Distal Radius Plates.
The Arthrex VAL Screws (3.5 mm and larger, solid) are intended to be used as stand-alone bone screws, or in a plate-screw system for internal bone fixation for bone fractures, fusions, osteotomies and non-unions in the ankle, foot, hand, wrist, clavicle, scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, tibia, calcaneous, pelvis, acetabulum, metacarpals, metatarsals, femur and fibula. When used with a plate, the screws may be used with the Arthrex Low Profile Plate, Small Fragment Plates, Fracture Plates, Distal Extremity Plates, Distal Radius Plates, Humeral Fracture Plates, Osteotomy Plates, and Ankle Fusion Plates.
The Arthrex SS VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screws are fracture fixation devices comprised of stainless steel (316L Stainless Steel per ASTM F138) self-tapping, solid, fully threaded, variable angle locking (VAL) screws. They are offered with a 2.7 mm or 3.5 mm diameter and range in lengths from 10 mm to 110 mm. The screws are sold single-use and non-sterile.
The Arthrex SS VAL Screws are fracture fixation devices comprised of stainless steel (316L Stainless Steel per ASTM F138) self-tapping, solid, fully threaded, variable angle locking (VAL) screws. They are offered with a 2.7 mm or 3.5 mm diameter and range in lengths from 8 mm to 110 mm. The screws are sold single-use and non-sterile.
The provided text describes mechanical performance testing for a medical device and not an AI/ML powered device, therefore the information required to answer the questions for an AI/ML powered device is not available.
The device in question, the "Arthrex SS VAL and VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screw System," is a physical medical device (fracture fixation screws) and the performance data described relates to mechanical properties (pull-out, compression, torque, etc.) and MRI compatibility. There is no mention of any AI/ML components, software algorithms, or clinical performance metrics typically associated with AI/ML device evaluations (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC).
Therefore, I cannot provide a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance in the context of AI/ML, nor can I answer questions regarding sample size for test sets, data provenance, expert ground truth, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, training set details, or how ground truth for a training set was established. These categories are specifically designed for the evaluation of AI/ML-powered devices.
Ask a specific question about this device
(55 days)
The Arthrex VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screws (2.0-3.0 mm solid) are intended to be used in a plate-screw system for internal bone fixation for bone fractures, fusions, osteotomies and non-unions in the ankle, foot, hand, wrist, tibia, fibula, femur, pelvis, acetabulum, metacarpals, metatarsals, humerus, radius, ulna, calcaneus, clavicle and scapula. When used with a plate, the screw may be used with the Arthrex Low Profile Plate, Small Fragment Plates, Distal Extremity Plates, Mesh Plates (2.7-3.0) and Distal Radius Plates.
The Arthrex Hybrid KreuLock™ Compression Screws (3.5 mm and larger, solid) are intended to be used in a plate-screw system for internal bone fixation for bone fractures, fusions, Osteotomies and non-unions in the ankle, foot, hand, wrist, clavicle, scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, tibia, calcaneus, pelvis, acetabulum, metatarsals, femur and fibula. When used with a plate, the screws may be used with the Arthrex Low Profile Plate, Small Fragment Plates, Fracture Plates, Distal Extremity Plates, Distal Radius Plates, Humeral Fracture Plates, Osteotomy Plates, and Ankle Fusion Plates.
The Arthrex Hybrid Low Profile VAL Screws (3.5mm and larger, solid) are intended to be used as stand-alone bone screws, or in a plate-screw system for internal bone fixation for bone fractures, fusions, osteotomies and non-unions in the ankle, foot, hand, wrist, clavicle, scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, tibia, calcaneus, pelvis, acetabulum, metacarpals, femur and fibula. When used with a plate, the screws may be used with the Arthrex Low Profile Plate, Small Fragment Plates, Fracture Plates, Distal Extremity Plates, Distal Radius Plates, Humeral Fracture Plates, Osteotomy Plates, and Ankle Fusion Plates.
The Arthrex VAL and VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screw System is a fracture fixation device system comprised of titanium (Titanium Ti-6AL-4V per ASTM F1472) self-tapping, solid, fully threaded, variable angle locking (VAL) screws that are offered in standard and hybrid configurations. The Arthrex VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screws are offered in 2.0, 2.7 and 3.0 diameters and range in lengths from 6 mm to 80 mm. The Arthrex Hybrid KreuLock™ Compression Screws and Hybrid Low Profile VAL Screws consist of line extension screws with the locking head geometry of the existing 2.7 mm screws and a shaft geometry of the existing 3.5 mm screws. The Arthrex Hybrid KreuLock™ Compression Screws range in lengths from 12 mm to 80 mm and the Arthrex Hybrid Low Profile VAL Screws range in lengths from 10 mm to 80 mm. Arthrex VAL and VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screw System consist of single-use, non-sterile devices intended for end-user sterilization.
The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the Arthrex VAL and VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screw System. This is a medical device submission, and the information is primarily focused on demonstrating substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices, rather than an AI/ML algorithm's performance study with acceptance criteria and ground truth.
Therefore, many of the requested details, such as sample size for test sets, data provenance, number and qualifications of experts, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, training set details, and ground truth establishment for an AI/ML model, are not applicable to this document.
However, I can extract information related to the performance data and the conclusion regarding substantial equivalence.
Here's a summary of the available information:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
Since this is a mechanical fixation device, the "acceptance criteria" are not framed in terms of metrics like sensitivity or specificity, but rather in terms of compliance with established ASTM standards for mechanical properties. The reported performance is that the device meets these standards.
| Acceptance Criteria (Standard Compliance) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| ASTM F543 Standard Specification and Test Methods for Metallic Medical Bone Screws (for pull-out testing, torsional strength testing, and driving torque testing) | Proposed devices are demonstrated to be substantially equivalent to primary predicate devices. Specific quantitative results are not provided in this summary. |
| FDA guidance "Testing and Labeling Medical Devices for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance (MR) Environment" | Passed. |
| ASTM F2052 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Magnetically Induced Displacement Force on Medical Devices in the Magnetic Resonance Environment | Passed. |
| ASTM F2119 Standard Test Method for Evaluation of MR Image Artifacts from Passive Implants | Passed. |
| ASTM F2182 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Radio Frequency Induced Heating Near Passive Implants During Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Passed. |
| ASTM F2213 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Magnetically Induced Torque on Medical Devices in the Magnetic Resonance Environment | Passed. |
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Sample Size for Test Set: Not explicitly stated in terms of the number of screws or test repetitions. Testing was conducted "on the proposed Arthrex VAL and VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screw Systems."
- Data Provenance: Not applicable in the context of clinical data provenance. The data comes from mechanical and MRI compatibility testing of the physical device.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- Not Applicable. This is a mechanical device, not an AI/ML diagnostic system requiring expert interpretation for ground truth. The "ground truth" is adherence to established engineering and safety standards.
4. Adjudication method for the test set:
- Not Applicable. Mechanical testing to standards does not typically involve adjudication in the clinical sense. Results are measured against predefined engineering specifications.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- Not Applicable. This is a medical implant, not an AI/ML diagnostic or assistive technology.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not Applicable. This is a medical implant, not an AI/ML algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used:
- The "ground truth" for this device's performance is adherence to recognized ASTM International standards and FDA guidance documents for mechanical properties (e.g., pull-out strength, torsional strength, driving torque) and MRI compatibility (e.g., force, torque, image artifact, heating).
8. The sample size for the training set:
- Not Applicable. This is a medical implant, not an AI/ML algorithm.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not Applicable. This is a medical implant, not an AI/ML algorithm.
In summary: The provided document is a 510(k) clearance letter for a traditional medical device (bone screws), not an AI/ML software device. Therefore, most of the requested information pertinent to AI/ML model validation is not found here and is not relevant to this type of device submission. The study described focuses on demonstrating the physical and mechanical properties of the screws meet established industry standards and are substantially equivalent to predicate devices.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 20