(273 days)
Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay is a direct immunofluorescence test intended for the simultaneous detection and identification of HSV 1 and 2 and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) from patients with vesicular, oral, genital, or skin lesions, and following amplification of virus in culture. Specimens found to be negative on direct specimen examination should be tested by cell culture.
Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay utilizes a single reagent for the simultaneous detection and identification of HSV and VZV. The primary component, specific for both HSV 1 and 2 will bind to 155kD major capsid protein in HSV-infected cells. The secondary component, specific for VZV, will bind to glycoprotein gp I and the immediate early antigen in VZV-infected cells. Unbound reagent is removed by rinsing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Illumination with ultraviolet light allows visualization of the antigen-antibody complexes by fluorescence microscopy. When a FITC filter set is used, the HSV antigen-antibody complex will exhibit an apple green fluorescence and the VZV antigen-antibody complex will fluoresce yellow-gold. Uninfected cells stain a dull red due to the presence of Evans blue in the reagent.
A blend of monoclonal antibodies directed against HSV and VZV is used in the Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV reagent. The use of monoclonal antibodies ensures increased specificity of the reagent and reduces the risk of non-specific background or interference.
Here's a summary of the acceptance criteria and study details for the Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay, based on the provided text:
Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly state pre-defined acceptance criteria (e.g., "the device must achieve a sensitivity of at least X%"). Instead, it reports the performance of the device and concludes that it is "substantially equivalent" to predicate devices, thus demonstrating safety and effectiveness. The reported performance metrics are presented below.
| Metric | Site 1 (Direct Specimen) - HSV | Site 1 (Direct Specimen) - VZV | Site 2 (Direct Specimen) - HSV | Site 2 (Direct Specimen) - VZV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 64.7% (CI 50.1-77.62%) | 100% (CI 83.2-100%) | 82.4% (CI 56.6-96.2%) | 100% (CI 71.5-100%) |
| Specificity | 97.5% (CI 91.3-99.7%) | 85.7% (CI 79.2-92.2%) | 99.5% (CI 97.5-100%) | 99.1% (CI 96.9-99.9%) |
| Metric | Site 1 (Culture Amplification) - HSV | Site 1 (Culture Amplification) - VZV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Sensitivity | 100% (CI 93.8-100%) | 95.2% (CI 76.2-99.9%) |
| Relative Specificity | 100% (CI 97.1-100%) | 100% (CI 97-100%) |
Study Details
-
Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Site 1 (Northeast US): 203 specimens tested for HSV or VZV.
- Site 2 (West Coast US): 283 specimens submitted for HSV and/or VZV testing; 236 specimens tested for HSV and VZV in direct specimens.
- Data Provenance: Clinical evaluations were conducted at two separate hospital laboratories in the US (Northeast and West Coast). The data is retrospective, as it involves the comparison of direct patient specimens and cell cultures.
-
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- The document does not specify the number of experts or their qualifications for establishing ground truth. The ground truth was established by "culture confirmation."
-
Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- The document does not describe any specific adjudication method for discrepancy resolution. Ground truth was determined solely by "culture confirmation."
-
If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- No, this was not a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study involving human readers and AI. This is a study evaluating an immunofluorescence assay (a laboratory test) against predicate devices and culture.
-
If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- This device is a direct immunofluorescence assay, which inherently requires human observation (fluorescence microscopy). Therefore, a "standalone algorithm only" performance is not applicable in the context of this device. The performance reported is the performance of the assay as read by a human.
-
The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- The primary ground truth used for the clinical evaluation was culture confirmation.
-
The sample size for the training set:
- The document does not describe a "training set" in the context of machine learning. The non-clinical evaluations involved characterization of monoclonal antibodies using "reference viral strains and clinical isolates," but a specific sample size for this characterization is not provided, nor is it analogous to a machine learning training set.
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not applicable, as there is no mention of a traditional machine learning training set. The characterization of antibodies involved testing against "reference viral strains and clinical isolates," implying known or well-characterized viral types.
{0}------------------------------------------------
OCT 19 10000
510K Notification for SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay Amendment A: April 28, 1999
510(k) Summary
| Submitter: | Light Diagnostics |
|---|---|
| 28835 Single Oak Drive | |
| Temecula, CA 92590 | |
| Tel: 909/676-8080 | |
| Fax: 909/676-9209 |
Cindy Penny Contact Person:
Product Name:
Trade Name: Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Common Name: Immunofluorescence Assay Classification Name: Herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus Classification Number: 866.3305-83LKC and 866.3900-83GQX
Intended Use:
Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay is a direct immunofluorescence test intended for the simultaneous detection and identification of HSV 1 and 2 and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) from patients with vesicular, oral, genital, or skin lesions, and following amplification of virus in culture. Specimens found to be negative on direct specimen examination should be tested by cell culture.
Predicate Devices:
-
- Bartels HSV Fluorescent Monoclonal Antibody Test The Bartels HSV reagent is a direct immunofluorescence test intended for the detection of HSV type 1 and HSV type 2 viruses in direct specimen and for culture confirmation. For in vitro diagnostic use.
-
- Meridian Merifluor™ VZV The Meridian VZV reagent is a direct immunofluorescence test for the detection of varicella-zoster virus in direct specimens and for culture confirmation. For in vitro diagnostic use.
-
- DPC PathoDx® Herpes Typing Kit The DPC HSV typing kit is a direct immunofluorescence test containing two reagents for the detection of HSV type 1 or HSV type 2 in direct specimens and for culture confirmation.
For in vitro diagnostic use.
{1}------------------------------------------------
510K Notification for SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay Amendment A: April 28, 1999
-
- Light Diagnostics Varicella-zoster virus DFA The Light Diagnostic VZV reagent is a direct immunofluorescence test for the detection of VZV in direct specimens and for culture confirmation. For in vitro diagnostic use.
Device description:
Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay utilizes a single reagent for the simultaneous detection and identification of HSV and VZV. The primary component, specific for both HSV 1 and 2 will bind to 155kD major capsid protein in HSV-infected cells. The secondary component, specific for VZV, will bind to glycoprotein gp I and the immediate early antigen in VZV-infected cells. Unbound reagent is removed by rinsing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Illumination with ultraviolet light allows visualization of the antigen-antibody complexes by fluorescence microscopy. When a FITC filter set is used, the HSV antigen-antibody complex will exhibit an apple green fluorescence and the VZV antigen-antibody complex will fluoresce yellow-gold. Uninfected cells stain a dull red due to the presence of Evans blue in the reagent.
A blend of monoclonal antibodies directed against HSV and VZV is used in the Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV reagent. The use of monoclonal antibodies ensures increased specificity of the reagent and reduces the risk of non-specific background or interference.
Technological Comparison of Methods:
The Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay is substantially equivalent to Bartels HSV Fluorescent Monoclonal Antibody Test, DPC PathoDx® Herpes Typing Kit, Meridian Merifluor™ VZV, and the Light Diagnostics VZV DFA:
- A. Three methods are intended for use in the detection of HSV antigens in patient specimens and infected cells.
- B. Three methods are intended for use in the detection of VZV antigens in patient specimens and infected cells.
- C. All five methods are in vitro test methods.
- D. All five methods use a direct immunofluorescence assay procedure for staining of slides using FITC filter sets.
{2}------------------------------------------------
The methods differ in that:
- A. The Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay consists of only one reagent that contains specific monoclonal antibodies labeled with two different fluorescent labels. This allows visualization of both viruses in one well. The Bartels reagent contains FITC-labeled monoclonal antibodies directed against HSV type 1 and type 2, the DPC kit consists of two FITC-labeled monoclonal antibodies directed against HSV type 1 or HSV type 2, and the Meridian reagent and the Light Diagnostics reagent each contains FITC-labeled monoclonal antibodies directed against VZV. Two or three completely separate tests are necessary to detect both viruses in one sample.
Performance Data for Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay:
-
- Non-clinical evaluation:
The monoclonal antibodies directed against VZV used in the Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV reagent are identical to those used in the Light Diagnostics VZV DFA, cleared for in vitro diagnostic use (K951799).
- Non-clinical evaluation:
The monoclonal antibodies directed against HSV used in the Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV reagent were characterized for their ability to detect HSV types 1 and 2. These antibodies reacted concordantly when tested with reference viral strains and clinical isolates. The conjugated monoclonal antibodies were also evaluated for cross reactivity to a variety of viruses and bacteria, and cell lines commonly used to isolate HSV. No reactivity was observed.
-
- Clinical evaluation:
The Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay was compared in clinical evaluation to culture confirmation for the detection and identification of HSV and VZV in patient specimens at 2 separate sites, the northeast (Site 1), and the west coast (Site 2). The Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV reagent was compared to the Bartels HSV reagent, the DPC PathoDx® Herpes Typing, the Meridian Merifluor™ VZV reagent, and the Light Diagnostics VZV reagent for the detection and identification of HSV and VZV in direct specimens and following isolation in culture.
- Clinical evaluation:
{3}------------------------------------------------
510K Notification for SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay Amendment A: April 28, 1999
At Site 1, 203 specimens were tested for the presence of HSV or VZV. Site 1 is a hospital laboratory in the northeast region of the US which also acts as a regional reference lab. On patient specimens the Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV reagent had a sensitivity of 64.7% (95% Confidence Interval of 50.1% to 77.62%) and a specificity of 97.5% (95% Confidence Interval of 91.3% to 99.7%) compared to culture for the identification of HSV, and a sensitivity of 100% (95% Confidence Interval of 83.2% to 100%) and a specificity of 85.7% (95% Confidence Interval of 79.2% to 92.2%) compared to culture for the identification of VZV. After amplification in culture the Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV reagent had a relative sensitivity of 100% (95% Confidence Interval of 93.8% to 100%) and a relative specificity of 100% (95% Confidence Interval of 97.1% to 100%) compared to the predicate device for detection of HSV. and a relative sensitivity of 95.2% (95% Confidence Interval of 76.2% to 99.9%) and a relative specificity of 100% (95% Confidence Interval of 97% to 100%) compared to the predicate device for detection of VZV.
At Site 2, 283 specimens were submitted to a hospital laboratory for HSV and / or VZV testing. Of these, 236 specimens were tested for the presence of HSV and VZV in direct specimens. Site 2 is a hospital laboratory on the west coast. Direct specimen slides were stained with the Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV reagent and the results compared to culture. The SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV reagent had a sensitivity of 82.4% (95% Confidence Interval of 56.6% - 96.2% ) and specificity of 99.5% (95% Confidence Interval 97.5% -100%) for the detection of HSV in direct specimens compared to culture. For the detection of VZV in patient specimens, the Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV had a sensitivity of 100% (95% Confidence Interval 71.5% - 100%) and a specificity of 99.1% 95% (Confidence Interval 96.9% - 99.9%) when compared to culture.
-
- Conclusions drawn from evaluations:
Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV uses a a standard Light direct immunofluorescence assay procedure for the detection of HSV and VZV in patient specimens and in cell culture. The monoclonal antibodies used in the reagent have been characterized to ensure specificity and reliability of the product. In clinical evaluations, the performance characteristics of the reagent was shown to be substantially equivalent to those of Bartels HSV reagent, DPC's HSV typing kit, Meridians Merifluor™ VZV reagent, and Light Diagnostics VZV reagent.
- Conclusions drawn from evaluations:
The characterization and clinical evaluation of the Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of this product when used as intended as described in the product insert.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). The seal features a stylized image of an eagle with three lines forming its body and wings. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
OCT 1 9 1999
Ms. Cindy Penny Manager, Quality Assurance Light Diagnostics 28835 Single Oak Drive Temecula, California 92590
K990141 Re:
Trade Name: Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSV/VZV Immunofluorescence Assay Regulatory Class: II, III Product Code: GQW, GQN Dated: July 20, 1999 Received: July 22, 1999
Dear Ms. Penny:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven Butman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known):
Light Diagnostics Simulfluor™ HSV / VZV Immunofluorescence Device Name: Assay
Light Diagnostics SimulFluor™ HSVNZV Indications For Use: Immunofluorescence Assay is a direct immunofluorescence test intended for the simultaneous detection and identification of HSV 1 and 2 and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) from patients with vesicular, oral, genital, or skin lesions, and following amplification of virus in culture. Specimens found to be negative on direct specimen examination should be tested by cell culture.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
| Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) | |
|---|---|
| Woodre Duhole | |
| (Division Sign-Off) | |
| Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices | |
| 510(k) Number | K990141 |
| Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109) | X | OR | Over-The-Counter-Use | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| --------------------------------------- | --- | ---- | ---------------------- | -- |
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
§ 866.3900 Varicella-zoster virus serological reagents.
(a)
Identification. Varicella-zoster virus serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to varicella-zoster in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of diseases caused by varicella-zoster viruses and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Varicella (chicken pox) is a mild, highly infectious disease, chiefly of children. Zoster (shingles) is the recurrent form of the disease, occurring in adults who were previously infected with varicella-zoster viruses. Zoster is the response (characterized by a rash) of the partially immune host to a reactivation of varicella viruses present in latent form in the patient's body.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).