(61 days)
The Rheumatoid Factor assay is used for the quantitation of rheumatoid factor (antibodies to immunoglobulins) in human serum or plasma. Measurement of rheumatoid factor may aid in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.
Rheumatoid Factor is an in vitro diagnostic assay for the quantitative determination of rheumatoid factor in human serum or plasma. The rheumatoid factor, an autoimmune antibody, in the sample interacts with the aggregated (denatured) human gamma globulin in the reagent forming immune complexes. The immune complexes cause an increase in light scattering, measured at 340 and 700 nm, which correlates with the concentration of rheumatoid factor in the sample.
Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the Abbott Laboratories Rheumatoid Factor assay, focusing on acceptance criteria and the study proving its performance:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The submission doesn't explicitly state "acceptance criteria" in a clear, quantitative, pre-defined manner. Instead, it demonstrates performance through comparative studies, implying that similar performance to the predicate device is the acceptance criterion for substantial equivalence.
| Performance Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implied by Predicate) | Reported Device Performance (Abbott RF Assay) |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation with Predicate Device | Acceptable correlation with K-ASSAY® Rheumatoid Factor assay on Hitachi® 717 Analyzer | Correlation coefficient = 0.9883, slope = 1.082, Y-intercept = -3.168 U/mL |
| Precision (Total %CV) | Similar precision to K-ASSAY® Rheumatoid Factor assay (not explicitly stated, but implied as "acceptable") | Level 1/Panel 502: 5.2% Total %CV Level 2/Panel 503: 2.2% Total %CV |
| Assay Range | A specific range of quantitation | 0.76 to 413.08 U/mL |
| Limit of Quantitation (Sensitivity) | A specific lower limit of quantitation | 2.97 U/mL |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document does not explicitly state the sample size used for the comparative performance studies.
- Sample Size (Test Set): Not specified.
- Data Provenance: Not specified (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective).
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
This information is not applicable and not mentioned. The "ground truth" in this context is the quantitative result from the predicate device (K-ASSAY® Rheumatoid Factor assay on the Hitachi® 717 Analyzer), not expert clinical adjudication.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This is not applicable as the "test set" involves comparing quantitative assay results to a predicate device, not subjective interpretation requiring adjudication.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done
No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This device is an in vitro diagnostic assay, not an imaging or diagnostic AI tool that would typically involve human readers interpreting cases.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was Done
Yes, the performance characteristics described (correlation, precision, assay range, limit of quantitation) are standalone algorithm-only performance metrics for the Rheumatoid Factor assay. There is no human-in-the-loop component mentioned for the diagnostic process itself.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" used for comparison was the results obtained from the legally marketed predicate device, the K-ASSAY® Rheumatoid Factor assay on the Hitachi® 717 Analyzer. This represents a "device-to-device" comparison for establishing substantial equivalence.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not applicable and not mentioned. This is not a machine learning or AI-based device that undergoes a "training phase" in the conventional sense. It's a chemical immunoassay; its "training" or development would involve formulation and optimization rather than data-driven model training.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
As explained above, this concept of a "training set" and "ground truth for training" is not relevant to this type of immunoassay device. The assay development would rely on established biochemical principles and analytical validation rather than a data training process.
{0}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
| Submitter's Name/Address | Abbott Laboratories |
|---|---|
| 1920 Hurd Drive | |
| Irving, Texas 75038 |
| Contact Person | Mark Littlefield |
|---|---|
| Section Manager MS 1-8 | |
| ADD Regulatory Affairs | |
| (972) 518-6062 | |
| Fax (972) 753-3367 |
| Date of Preparation of this Summary: | January 4, 1999 |
|---|---|
| Device Trade or Proprietary Name: | RF |
| Device Common/Usual Name or Classification Name: | Rheumatoid Factor |
| Classification Number/Class: | Class II |
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92.
The assigned 510(k) number is: K090635
Test Description:
Rheumatoid Factor is an in vitro diagnostic assay for the quantitative determination of rheumatoid factor in human serum or plasma. The rheumatoid factor, an autoimmune antibody, in the sample interacts with the aggregated (denatured) human gamma globulin in the reagent forming immune complexes. The immune complexes cause an increase in light scattering, measured at 340 and 700 nm, which correlates with the concentration of rheumatoid factor in the sample.
Rheumatoid Factor 510(k) January 4, 1999
Rf_5_VI.lwp
Section II Page I
Image /page/0/Picture/9 description: The image shows a sequence of numbers. The sequence consists of five zeros followed by two ones. The numbers are printed in a bold, sans-serif font.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Substantial Equivalence:
The Rheumatoid Factor assay is substantially equivalent to the K-ASSAY® Rheumatoid Factor assay (K964415) on the Hitachi® 717 Analyzer.
Both assays vield similar Performance Characteristics. Similarities:
- Both assays are in vitro immunoassays. t the state the state the state the state the state the station of the firm and the firm and the finitial was and the finitial was and the finitial was and the finalistic the
- Both assays can be used for the quantitative determination of rheumatoid . factor.
- Both assays yield similar clinical results. .
- Both assays are based on the light scattering properties of immune complexes. .
Differences:
- There is a difference between the assay range. .
- There is a difference in the test mode. .
Intended Use:
The Rheumatoid Factor assay is used for the quantitation of rheumatoid factor in human serum or plasma.
Performance Characteristics:
Comparative performance studies were conducted using the AEROSET™ System. The Rheumatoid Factor assay method comparison yielded acceptable correlation with the K-ASSAY Rheumatoid Factor assay on the Hitachi 717 Analyzer. The correlation coefficient = 0.9883, slope = 1.082, and the Y-intercept = -3.168 U/mL. Precision studies were conducted using the Rheumatoid Factor assay. Within-run, between-run, and between-day studies were performed using two levels of control material. The total %CV for Level 1/Panel 502 is 5.2% and Level 2/Panel 503 is 2.2%. The Rheumatoid Factor assay range is 0.76 to 413.08 U/mL. The limit of quantitation (sensitivity) of the Rheumatoid Factor assay is 2.97 U/mL. These data demonstrate
Rheumatoid Factor 510(k) January 4, 1999 Rf_5_VI.lwp
Section II Page 2
0000012
{2}------------------------------------------------
that the performance of the Rheumatoid Factor assay is substantially equivalent to the performance of the K-ASSAY Rheumatoid Factor assay on the Hitachi 717 Analyzer.
Conclusion:
The Rheumatoid Factor assay is substantially equivalent to the K-ASSAY Rheumatoid Factor assay on the Hitachi 717 Analyzer as demonstrated by results obtained in the studies.
Rheumatoid Factor 510(k) January 4, 1999 Rf_5_V1.lwp
Section II Page 3
Image /page/2/Picture/5 description: The image shows the number 0000013 in a bold, sans-serif font. The numbers are black against a white background. The number is likely part of a sequence or identification code.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the United States Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract image of an eagle or bird-like figure with three stylized lines representing its wings or feathers.
Public Health Service
MAR - 8 1999
Mr. Mark Littlefield Section Manager, Regulatory Affairs Abbott Laboratories 1920 Hurd Drive Irving, Texas 75038
Re: K990035 Trade Name: RF Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DHR Dated: January 4, 1999 Received: January 6, 1999
Dear Mr. Littlefield:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770) 488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification"(21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours.
Steven Autman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D, M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known): ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Rheumatoid Factor Device Name:
Indications For Use:
The Rheumatoid Factor assay is used for the quantitation of rheumatoid factor (antibodies to immunoglobulins) in human serum or plasma. Measurement of rheumatoid factor may aid in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.
Peter E. Malin
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) Prescription Use V OR Over-The-Counter Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Rheumatoid Factor 510(k) January 4, 1999 Rf_5_VI.lwp
00000000
§ 866.5775 Rheumatoid factor immunological test system.
(a)
Identification. A rheumatoid factor immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the rheumatoid factor (antibodies to immunoglobulins) in serum, other body fluids, and tissues. Measurement of rheumatoid factor may aid in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).