(57 days)
COBAS INTEGRA Ammonia (NH3): contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the ammonia concentration in plasma (test NH3, 0-045).
COBAS INTEGRA aAmylase EPS (AMYLL): contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the catalytic activity of amylase in serum, plasma (test AMY-L, 0998) and urine (test AMY-UL 0-999).
COBAS INTEGRA Cholesterol (CHOLL): contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of total cholesterol (test CHOLL, 0-001) and HDL cholesterol concentration in serum and plasma in clinical laboratories.
COBAS INTEGRA HDL Cholesterol Application (HDLL): contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of total cholesterol and HDL - cholesterol (test HDLL, 0-002) concentration in serum and plasma in clinical laboratories.
COBAS INTEGRA Creatinine Enzymatic (CREAE): contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the creatinine concentration in serum (test CREAE, 0-014), and urine (test CREEU, 0-114).
COBAS INTEGRA Digitoxin (DIGIT): contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of digitoxin in serum or heparinized plasma (test DIGIT 0-259).
COBAS INTEGRA Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGTL): contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the catalytic activity of GGT, (EC 2.3.2.2; y-glutamyl peptide: amino acid y-glutamyltransferase) in serum and plasma (test GGTL, 0-599).
COBAS INTEGRA Glucose HK Liquid (GLUCL): contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the glucose concentration in serum, plasma (test GLUL, 0-991), urine (test GLULU, 0-992), and cerebrospinal fluid (test GLULC, 0-993).
COBAS INTEGRA Lipase (LIPL): contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the catalytic activity of lipase in serum and plasma (test LIPL, 0-200).
COBAS INTEGRA Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the qualitative determination of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) in urine (test LSD, 0-001)
COBAS INTEGRA Urea/BUN (UREAL): contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the urea/BUN (blood urea nitrogen), in serum, plasma (test UREL, 0-003) and urine (test URELU, 0-004).
Roche TDM OnLine Digitoxin Calibrators: are intended for use with the Roche reagents for Digitoxin and the COBAS Chemistry systems for the quantitative determination of digitoxin in serum and plasma.
Roche TDM OnLine Digitoxin Controls: are quality control samples intended for use on COBAS chemistry systems with Roche reagents and calibrators for the quantitative determination of digitoxin assays.
The COBAS INTEGRA test applications contained in this submission are intended for use with the COBAS INTEGRA Analyzer. The COBAS INTEGRA Analyzer and COBAS INTEGRA Reagent cassettes together provide an integrated system for in vitro diagnostic testing. The COBAS INTEGRA Analyzer utilizes three measuring principles, i.e., absorbance, fluorescence polarization and ion-selective electrodes. The analyzer has a throughput of up to 600 tests per hour with STAT samples prioritized and tested immediately. Random sample access, robotics and a user interface optimize time management and streamline workflow. The COBAS INTEGRA can store up to 68 COBAS INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes on board, 24 hours a day at 2-8℃. The COBAS INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes are compact and preparation-free with the added convenience of long term on-board stability. Barcode readers are used to identify newly loaded reagent cassettes, samples for patient identification, and rack inserts and to read calibration and control data from the cassette label. COBAS INTEGRA tests include chemistry, drugs of abuse, immunology, ion selective electrodes, therapeutic drug monitoring, and hematology reagents. Through this submission, it is the intention of Roche Diagnostic Systems to gain clearance for an additional 4 COBAS INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes and 2 ancillary reagents as well as modifications to 7 previously cleared COBAS INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes. These reagents have been modified from granulate to liquid form.
The provided 510(k) summary (K972250) describes the acceptance criteria and study results for several Roche COBAS INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes and ancillary reagents. The studies are primarily focused on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than establishing de novo performance criteria against a fixed clinical standard. Consequently, the "acceptance criteria" are implied by the results of the comparative studies to be within acceptable analytical performance limits for equivalent devices.
Here's a breakdown of the requested information for each reagent, based on the provided text:
Roche COBAS® INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes & Ancillary Reagents (K972250)
The acceptance criteria are generally implied by the strong correlation and similar performance characteristics (assay range, precision, sensitivity, accuracy/linearity) when compared to the legally marketed predicate devices. The study's goal was to demonstrate substantial equivalence, meaning the new device performs comparably to the predicate.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria for these in vitro diagnostic devices are demonstrated through a comparison of their performance characteristics (Assay Range, Precision, Sensitivity, Accuracy/Correlation Coefficient, and Linear Regression) against legally marketed predicate devices. The "reported device performance" is the performance of the COBAS INTEGRA (Liquid) reagents. The "acceptance criteria" are implied to be within comparable ranges to the predicate devices, indicating substantial equivalence.
Note: For each test, the predicate device's performance is presented alongside the new device's performance, and the linear regression typically shows correlation against the predicate. This comparative approach is the core of the acceptance criteria.
Ammonia (NH3)
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA Ammonia Liquid) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 700 U/L (0-2800 U/L with postdilution) | 0 - 700 µmol/L (0-1190 ug/dL) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: ૯દિવ; %CV (within run): 5.7; %CV (total): 8.8 | Mean: 48.8 µmol/L; %CV (w/r): 3.1; %CV (total): 5.2 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 211; %CV (within run): 1.9; %CV (total): 5.9 | Mean: 226 µmol/L; %CV (w/r): 2.0; %CV (total): 2.5 |
| Sensitivity | 0.0009 AA per µmol/L | 0.76 AA per µmol/L |
| Accuracy (n=164) | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.992 | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.997 |
| Lin. Regression | 1.02x + 3.2 µmol/L | 1.03x - 2.8 µmol/L vs. Roche Reagent for Ammonia |
Creatinine (CREAE) - Serum and Plasma
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: COBAS INTEGRA Creatinine (Kinetic, Jaffé)) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA Creatinine (Enzymatic, PAP)) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 1300 µmol/L (0-13000 µmol/L with post dilution) | 0 - 2000 µmol/L (0-20000 µmol/L with post dilution) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 85.5 µmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.5; %CV (total): 1.9 | Mean: 99.4 µmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.6; %CV (total): 2.2 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 624 µmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.1; %CV (total): 1.5 | Mean: 535 µmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.88; %CV (total): 1.5 |
| Sensitivity | 8.0 X 10^-5 ΔA/min per µmol/L | 2.2 X 10^-4 ΔA per µmol/L |
| Accuracy (n=238) | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.999 | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.999 |
| Lin. Regression | 0.87x - 2 µmol/L | 1.08x - 30.6 µmol/L vs. COBAS INTEGRA Creatinine (Jaffé) |
Creatinine (CREAE) - Urine
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: COBAS INTEGRA Creatinine (Kinetic, Jaffé)) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA Creatinine (Enzymatic, PAP)) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 32.5 mmol/L (0-130 mmol/L with post dilution) | 0 - 40 mmol/L (0-200 mmol/L with post dilution) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 5.3 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.5 | Mean: 4.1 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.88; %CV (total): 1.1 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 19 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.0 | Mean: 14.0 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.87; %CV (total): 0.93 |
| Sensitivity | Not specified in labeling | 5.7 X 10^-3 ΔA per mmol/L |
| Accuracy (n=116) | Not specified in labeling | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.999 |
| Lin. Regression | Not specified in labeling | 0.99x - 0.28 mmol/L vs. COBAS INTEGRA Creatinine (Jaffé) |
Digitoxin (DIGIT)
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: Abbott TDx/TDxFLx Digitoxin) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA Digitoxin) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 2.0 - 80 ng/mL | 2.0 - 65 ng/mL |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 7.5 ng/mL; %CV (w/r): 7.05; %CV (total): 10.61 | Mean: 10.4 ng/mL; %CV (w/r): 6.0; %CV (total): 7.4 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 15.0 ng/mL; %CV (w/r): 4.87; %CV (total): 7.19 | Mean: 19.5 ng/mL; %CV (w/r): 3.9; %CV (total): 4.5 |
| Precision (Level 3) | Mean: 35.0 ng/mL; %CV (w/r): 4.72; %CV (total): 8.46 | Mean: 37.1 ng/mL; %CV (w/r): 3.6; %CV (total): 3.7 |
| Sensitivity | 2.0 ng/mL | 2.0 ng/mL |
| Accuracy (n=232) | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.967 | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.973 |
| Lin. Regression | 1.060 + 0.729 ng/mL | 0.945x + 1.19 ng/mL vs. Abbott TDx/TDxFLx Digitoxin |
Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: Roche Abuscreen RIA for LSD) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA LSD) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 1 ng/mL | 0 - 1 ng/mL |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 0.0; %CV (w/r): 0.6 | Mean (O.D.): 0.978; %CV (w/r): N/A |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 0.25; %CV (w/r): 1.3 | Mean (O.D.): 0.913; %CV (w/r): N/A |
| Precision (Level 3) | Mean: 0.5; %CV (w/r): 1.6 | Mean (O.D.): 0.870; %CV (w/r): N/A |
| Sensitivity | 0.25 ng/mL of LSD at > 99% confidence | 0.10 ng/mL of LSD at > 95% confidence |
| Accuracy | Positive Samples (GC/MS): 21/0; Positive Samples (RIA): 21/0 | Positive Samples (GC/MS): 39/0; Positive Samples (RIA): 39/0 |
Note: For LSD, precision is presented in Optical Density (O.D.) for the new device vs. ng/mL for the predicate, making direct comparison of mean values challenging. However, the %CV for within-run are similar.
α-Amylase (AMYLL) - Serum and Plasma
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: COBAS INTEGRA α-Amylase (Granulate)) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA α-Amylase EPS (Liquid)) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 2000 U/L (0-20000 U/L with post dilution) | 0 - 2000 U/L (0-10000 U/L with post dilution) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 143 U/L; %CV (w/r): 1.6; %CV (total): 1.6 | Mean: 76 U/L; %CV (w/r): 1.6; %CV (total): 2.3 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 277 U/L; %CV (w/r): 1.1; %CV (total): 2.0 | Mean: 498 U/L; %CV (w/r): 1.3; %CV (total): 2.6 |
| Sensitivity | 1.5 X 10^-4 ΔA/min per U/L | 1.9 X 10^-4 ΔA/min per U/L |
| Accuracy (n=114) | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.992 | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.996 |
| Lin. Regression | 0.98x - 19 U/L | 0.43x + 4 U/L vs. COBAS INTEGRA α-Amylase (granulate) |
α-Amylase (AMYLL) - Urine
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: COBAS INTEGRA α-Amylase (Granulate)) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA α-Amylase EPS (Liquid)) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 2000 U/L (0-20000 U/L with post dilution) | 0 - 2000 U/L (0-10000 U/L with post dilution) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 22 U/L; %CV (w/r): 2.5 | Mean: 183 U/L; %CV (w/r): 1.3; %CV (total): 1.7 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 302 U/L; %CV (w/r): 0.56 | Mean: 603 U/L; %CV (w/r): N/A; %CV (total): 1.6 |
| Sensitivity | Not specified in labeling | 1.9 X 10^-4 ΔA/min per U/L |
| Accuracy (n=150) | Not specified in labeling | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.988 |
| Lin. Regression | Not specified in labeling | 0.44x + 0 U/L vs. COBAS INTEGRA α-Amylase (granulate) |
Cholesterol (CHOLL)
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: COBAS INTEGRA Cholesterol (Granulate)) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA Cholesterol (Liquid)) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 20.7 mmol/L (0-8000 mg/dL with post dilution) | 0 - 18.1 mmol/L (0-7000 mg/dL with post dilution) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 5.0 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.3; %CV (total): 1.1 | Mean: 5.3 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.3; %CV (total): 2.2 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 6.3 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.0; %CV (total): 1.2 | Mean: 6.7 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.1; %CV (total): 2.5 |
| Precision (Level 3) | Mean: 8.0 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 2.0; %CV (total): 1.5 | N/A |
| Sensitivity | 6.4 X 10^-2 ΔA per mmol/L | 8.8 X 10^-2 ΔA per mmol/L |
| Accuracy (n=214) | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.995 | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.998 |
| Lin. Regression | 1.04x + 0.1 mmol/L | 0.99x + 0.0 mmol/L vs. COBAS INTEGRA Cholesterol (granulate) |
HDL-Cholesterol Application (HDLL)
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: COBAS INTEGRA HDL - Cholesterol Application (granulate)) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA HDL - Cholesterol Application (liquid)) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 5.0 mmol/L (0-193 mg/dL) | 0 - 5.0 mmol/L (0-193 mg/dL) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 0.82 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.2; %CV (total): 2.7 | Mean: 0.20 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.51.3*; %CV (total): 3.0 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 1.42 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.85; %CV (total): 5.5 | Mean: 1.91 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.26; %CV (total): 1.6 |
| Sensitivity | 6.4 X 10^-2 ΔA per mmol/L | 8.8 X 10^-2 ΔA per mmol/L |
| Accuracy (n=240) | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.998 | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.999 |
| Lin. Regression | 0.99x - 0.05 mmol/L | 0.99x + 0.03 mmol/L vs. COBAS INTEGRA HDL - Cholesterol Application (granulate) |
Note: There seems to be a typo for %CV (within run) in Level 1 of the HDLL liquid reagent (1.51.3).
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase (GGTL)
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: COBAS INTEGRA GGT (Granulate)) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA GGTL (Liquid)) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 700 U/L (0-7000 U/L with post dilution) | 0 - 600 U/L (0-6000 U/L with post dilution) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 37.9 U/L; %CV (w/r): 0.67; %CV (total): 1.2 | Mean: 21 U/L; %CV (w/r): 0.83; %CV (total): 2.8 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 345 U/L; %CV (w/r): 0.46; %CV (total): 1.4 | Mean: 428 U/L; %CV (w/r): 0.54; %CV (total): 1.5 |
| Sensitivity | 5.0 X 10^4 ΔA/min per U/L | 6.8 X 10^4 ΔA/min per U/L |
| Accuracy (n=196) | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.998 | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.999 |
| Lin. Regression | 1.00x + 0 U/L | 1.00x - 1.2 U/L vs. COBAS INTEGRA GGTL (granulate) |
Glucose (GLUCL) - Serum and Plasma
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: COBAS INTEGRA Glucose (Granulate)) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA Glucose (Liquid)) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 40 mmol/L (0-400 mmol/L with post dilution) | 0 - 40 mmol/L (0-400 mmol/L with post dilution) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 5.6 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.2; %CV (total): 1.1 | Mean: 5.3 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.7; %CV (total): 2.6 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 19.7 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.97; %CV (total): 0.89 | Mean: 33.2 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.72; %CV (total): 1.5 |
| Sensitivity | 9.3 X 10^-2 ΔA per mmol/L | 5.4 X 10^-2 ΔA per mmol/L |
| Accuracy (n=220) | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.997 | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.999 |
| Lin. Regression | 0.98x + 0.1 mmol/L | 1.05x - 0.2 mmol/L vs. COBAS INTEGRA Glucose (granulate) |
Glucose (GLUCL) - Urine
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: COBAS INTEGRA Glucose (Granulate)) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA Glucose (Liquid)) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 16 mmol/L (0-160 mmol/L with post dilution) | 0 - 40 mmol/L (0-400 mmol/L with post dilution) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 0.27 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 2.0 | Mean: 1.7 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.7; %CV (total): 4.3 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 0.48 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.99 | Mean: 37.1 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.8; %CV (total): 2.9 |
| Sensitivity | 2.2 X 10^1 ΔA per mmol/L | 5.4 X 10^2 ΔA per mmol/L |
| Accuracy (n=120) | Not specified in labeling | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.999 |
| Lin. Regression | Not specified in labeling | 1.01x - 0.02 mmol/L vs. COBAS INTEGRA Glucose (granulate) |
Glucose (GLUCL) - CSF
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: COBAS INTEGRA Glucose (Granulate)) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA Glucose (Liquid)) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 20 mmol/L (0-360 mmol/L with post dilution) | 0 - 40 mmol/L (0-400 mmol/L with post dilution) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 4.7 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.57 | Mean: 1.7 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.6; %CV (total): 2.3 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 10.3 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.23 | Mean: 3.3 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.8; %CV (total): 1.9 |
| Sensitivity | 1.8 X 10^1 ΔA per mmol/L | 5.4 X 10^2 ΔA per mmol/L |
| Accuracy (n=212) | Not specified in labeling | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.999 |
| Lin. Regression | Not specified in labeling | 1.02x - 0.17 mmol/L vs. COBAS INTEGRA Glucose (granulate) |
Lipase (LIPL)
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: COBAS INTEGRA Lipase (Granulate)) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA Lipase (Liquid)) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 700 U/L (0-3500 U/L with post dilution) | 0 - 600 U/L (0-3000 U/L with post dilution) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 116 U/L; %CV (w/r): 1.7; %CV (total): 4.6 | Mean: 126 U/L; %CV (w/r): 1.9; %CV (total): 3.1 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 550 U/L; %CV (w/r): 2.1; %CV (total): 3.7 | Mean: 515 U/L; %CV (w/r): 1.3; %CV (total): 2.9 |
| Sensitivity | 5.6 X 10^-5 ΔA/min per U/L | 6.4 X 10^-5 ΔA/min per U/L |
| Accuracy (n=198) | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.976 | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.976 |
| Lin. Regression | 1.06x - 7 U/L | 0.82x + 16 U/L vs. COBAS INTEGRA Lipase (granulate) |
Urea/BUN (UREAL) - Serum and Plasma
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: COBAS INTEGRA Urea/BUN (Granulate)) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA Urea/BUN (Liquid)) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 55 mmol/L (0-550 mmol/L with post dilution) | 0 - 40 mmol/L (0-400 mmol/L with post dilution) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 6.9 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.85; %CV (total): 2.0 | Mean: 4.1 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 2.3; %CV (total): 3.9 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 19.9 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.0; %CV (total): 2.3 | Mean: 31.0 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.89; %CV (total): 2.8 |
| Sensitivity | 6.8 X 10^-3 ΔA/min per mmol/L | 2.2 X 10^-2 ΔA/min per mmol/L |
| Accuracy (n=236) | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.999 | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.999 |
| Lin. Regression | 1.01x + 0.30 mmol/L | 1.00x + 0.1 mmol/L vs. COBAS INTEGRA Urea/BUN (granulate) |
Urea/BUN (UREAL) - Urine
| Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: COBAS INTEGRA Urea/BUN (Granulate)) | Reported Device Performance (COBAS INTEGRA Urea/BUN (Liquid)) |
|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 2200 mmol/L (0-5500 mmol/L with post dilution) | 0 - 2000 mmol/L (0-6000 mmol/L with post dilution) |
| Precision (Level 1) | Mean: 73 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.99 | Mean: 421 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.3; %CV (total): 1.8 |
| Precision (Level 2) | Mean: 345 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 0.6 | Mean: 679 mmol/L; %CV (w/r): 1.2; %CV (total): 1.8 |
| Sensitivity | Not specified in labeling | 2.0 X 10^-2 ΔA/min per mmol/L |
| Accuracy (n=120) | Not specified in labeling | Corr. Coefficient (r): 0.999 |
| Lin. Regression | Not specified in labeling | 1.0X + 1.3 mmol/L vs. COBAS INTEGRA Urea/BUN (granulate) |
2. Sample sizes used for the test set and data provenance
The sample sizes for accuracy/correlation studies are provided in the tables above under "Sample size (n)". These values range from 114 to 240 for quantitative assays and 39 (positive) for LSD.
The data provenance is not explicitly stated as "country of origin" or "retrospective/prospective." However, given the context of a 510(k) submission for in vitro diagnostic reagents by Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc. (located in Somerville, New Jersey, USA), it is highly likely these studies were conducted in a clinical laboratory setting in the USA. The studies are presented as direct comparisons between the new liquid reagents and existing granulate reagents or other legally marketed devices, implying they are prospective comparative studies assessing analytical performance.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and qualifications of those experts
For these chemical assays (e.g., ammonia, creatinine, cholesterol) and therapeutic drug monitoring (digitoxin), "ground truth" is typically established by the quantitative results of the predicate device or a reference method. The document does not mention "experts" in the sense of human readers adjudicating results, as these are quantitative in vitro diagnostic tests. The ground truth is the measured concentration or activity of the analyte as determined by the accepted reference method or predicate device functionality.
For LSD, which involves qualitative detection, the "ground truth" against which the COBAS INTEGRA LSD was compared appears to be GC/MS (Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry), which is a gold standard analytical method for drug detection. The document does not specify the qualifications of individuals performing these GC/MS analyses or interpreting the results, but they would be trained laboratory personnel.
4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
No adjudication method is mentioned. For these types of quantitative and qualitative analytical tests, "adjudication" by experts in the context of diagnostic imaging or pathology interpretation is not applicable. The comparison is based on numerical results compared to an established method or predicate.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, if so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
No MRMC study was conducted. This type of study is relevant for medical imaging or pathology devices where human interpretation is a key component, often assisted by AI. The submitted devices are reagents for automated clinical analyzers, where the output is a numerical value or a qualitative positive/negative result, not an image requiring human interpretation. Therefore, there's no mention of AI assistance or human reader improvement.
6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Yes, the studies presented are effectively standalone performance evaluations of the reagent-analyzer system. These are not "algorithm-only" studies in the modern AI sense, but rather a direct assessment of the analytical performance of the new liquid reagent format on the COBAS INTEGRA Analyzer. The results (e.g., assay range, precision, accuracy) reflect the performance of the integrated system without direct human-in-the-loop interpretation impacting the primary measurement.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
The type of ground truth used varies slightly based on the assay, but generally involves:
- Quantitative Assays (Ammonia, Creatinine, Cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol, GGT, Glucose, Lipase, Urea/BUN): The ground truth for these assays is the quantitative result obtained from the predicate device method. The accuracy is assessed by correlating the results of the new liquid reagents with the predicate (often the granulate version of the same Roche COBAS INTEGRA reagents or another established method like Abbott TDx/TDxFLx for Digitoxin). Linear regression analysis is used to demonstrate agreement.
- Qualitative Assay (LSD): The ground truth for LSD detection is established by a more definitive analytical method, specifically Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS).
8. The sample size for the training set
The document does not explicitly delineate a "training set" in the context of machine learning or AI development. For these chemical assays, the development of the reagents and their formulation would involve extensive R&D and optimization, which could be considered an iterative development process, but it's not described as a distinct "training set" with separate ground truth establishment. The data presented in the tables are for validation or verification of the final product.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
As there is no explicitly defined "training set" in the submitted documentation related to AI/ML, there is no description of how ground truth for such a set was established. The development of reagents relies on established chemical and biochemical principles, and performance characteristics are determined through standard analytical validation procedures using reference materials and comparative studies against predicate methods.
{0}------------------------------------------------
912250
Roche
AUG 1 2 1997
510(k) Summary
Roche COBAS® INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes
In accordance with the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, a 510(k) summary is provided as outlined in 21 CFR 807.92.
Identification of 510(k) Sponsor: I.
Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc. a subsidiary of Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. Branchburg Township 1080 U.S. Highway 202 Somerville, New Jersey 08876-3771
510(k) Submission dated June 13, 1997
Maria Feijoo Contact: Regulatory Affairs Associate Phone: (908) 253-7310 (908) 253-7547 Fax:
{1}------------------------------------------------
II. Device Name:
/
The device name, including both the trade/proprietary name and the classification name are provided in the table below.
| Proprietary Name | Classification Name | Product Code | Regulation Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| COBAS INTEGRA... | |||
| Ammonia | Ammonia test system,Enzymatic method | JIF | 862.1065 |
| αAmylase EPS | Amylase test system,Catalytic method | JFJ | 862.1070 |
| Cholesterol | Cholesterol test system,Enzymatic esterase - oxidasemethod | CHH | 862.1175 |
| HDL-Cholesterol | Lipoprotein test system,Phosphotungstic acid method | N/A | 862.1475 |
| Creatinine | Creatinine test system,Enzymatic method | JFY | 862.1225 |
| Digitoxin | Digitoxin test system,Kinetic interaction ofmicroparticles in solution method | DKQ | 862.3300 |
| Gamma-Glutamyltransferase (GGT) | Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and isoenzymes test system,Kinetic method | JQB | 862.1360 |
| Glucose HK | Glucose test system,Enzymatic method | CFR | 862.1345 |
| Lipase | Lipase test system,Turbidimetric method | CET | 862.1465 |
| Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) | Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) test system,Kinetic interaction ofmicroparticles in solution method | N/A | 862.3580 |
| Urea | Urea nitrogen test system,Kinetic urease method | CDQ | 862.1770 |
| Roche TDM OnLine... | |||
| Digitoxin Calibrators | Clinical toxicology calibrator,Drug specific | DLJ | 862.3200 |
| Digitoxin Controls | Clinical toxicology controlmaterial,Drug specific | LAS | 862.3280 |
| ableœ5 | |
|---|---|
| ---------------- | -- |
{2}------------------------------------------------
1
III. Identification of the legally marketed device to which the 510(k) sponsor claims equivalence:
The following table identifies the legally marketed devices to which Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc. claims equivalence.
| Product Name | Predicate Product Name | K number | Date ofsubstantialequivalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| COBAS INTEGRA... | |||
| Ammonia | Roche Reagent for Ammonia | K913124 | 8/12/91 |
| αAmylase EPS (Liquid) | COBAS INTEGRA αAmylase (Granulate,CL-PNP-G, method) | K951595 | 9/8/95 |
| Cholesterol (Liquid) | COBAS INTEGRA Cholesterol (Granulate) | K951595 | 9/8/95 |
| HDL - Cholesterol (Liquid) | COBAS INTEGRAHDL - Cholesterol(Granulate) | K951595 | 9/8/95 |
| Creatinine (Enzymatic) | COBAS INTEGRA Creatinine (KineticJaffe) | K951595 | 9/8/95 |
| Digitoxin | Abbott Diagnostics, TDX / TDX FlexDigitoxin Reagent | K842280 | 8/16/84 |
| Gamma-Glutamyltransferase (GGT) | COBAS INTEGRA Lipase (Granulate) | K951595 | 9/8/95 |
| Glucose HK | COBAS INTEGRA Glucose HK (Granulate) | K951595 | 9/8/95 |
| Lipase | COBAS INTEGRA Lipase (Granulate) | K951595 | 9/8/95 |
| Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) | |||
| Urea | COBAS INTEGRA Urea (Granulate) | K951595 | 9/8/95 |
| Roche TDM OnLine ... | |||
| Digitoxin Calibrators | Abbott Diagnostics, TDX / TDX FlexDigitoxin Calibrators | K842280 | 8/16/84 |
| Digitoxin Controls | Abbott Diagnostics, TDX / TDX FlexDigitoxin Controls | K842280 | 8/16/84 |
| 11C | ablાર | 1 |
|---|---|---|
IV. Description of the Device/Statement of Intended Use:
The COBAS INTEGRA test applications contained in this submission are intended for use with the COBAS INTEGRA Analyzer. The COBAS INTEGRA Analyzer and COBAS INTEGRA Reagent cassettes together provide an integrated system for in vitro diagnostic testing. The COBAS INTEGRA Analyzer along with 96 other Roche COBAS INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes were previously cleared on September 8, 1995 (K951595); January 25, 1996 (K954992); July 23, 1996 (K961824); October 31, 1996 (K963292); and January 21, 1997 (K964457).
{3}------------------------------------------------
The COBAS INTEGRA Analyzer utilizes three measuring principles, i.e., absorbance, fluorescence polarization and ion-selective electrodes. The analyzer has a throughput of up to 600 tests per hour with STAT samples prioritized and tested immediately. Random sample access, robotics and a user interface optimize time management and streamline workflow. The COBAS INTEGRA can store up to 68 COBAS INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes on board, 24 hours a day at 2-8℃. The COBAS INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes are compact and preparation-free with the added convenience of long term on-board stability. Barcode readers are used to identify newly loaded reagent cassettes, samples for patient identification, and rack inserts and to read calibration and control data from the cassette label. COBAS INTEGRA tests include chemistry, drugs of abuse, immunology, ion selective electrodes, therapeutic drug monitoring, and hematology reagents. For additional information on the COBAS INTEGRA Analyzer and its constituent modules, please refer to the Operator's Manual in Volumes 1 through 2, pages 92-703, of the original 510(k) submission (K951595).
Through this submission, it is the intention of Roche Diagnostic Systems to gain clearance for an additional 4 COBAS INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes and 2 ancillary reagents as well as modifications to 7 previously cleared COBAS INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes. These reagents have been modified from granulate to liquid form.
The new Reagent Cassettes and ancillary reagents are:
COBAS INTEGRA Ammonia (NH3):
contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the ammonia concentration in plasma (test NH3, 0-045).
COBAS INTEGRA Creatinine Enzymatic (CREAE):
contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the creatinine concentration in serum (test CREAE, 0-014), and urine (test CREEU, 0-114).
COBAS INTEGRA Digitoxin (DIGIT):
contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of digitoxin in serum or heparinized plasma (test DIGIT 0-259).
Roche TDM OnLine Digitoxin Calibrators:
are intended for use with the Roche reagents for Digitoxin and the COBAS Chemistry systems for the quantitative determination of digitoxin in serum and plasma.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc. Somerville, New Jersey 08876 June 1997
Roche TDM OnLine Digitoxin Controls:
are quality control samples intended for use on COBAS chemistry systems with Roche reagents and calibrators for the quantitative determination of digitoxin assays.
COBAS INTEGRA Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD):
contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the qualitative determination of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) in urine (test LSD, 0-001)
The modified Reagent Cassettes are:
COBAS INTEGRA aAmylase EPS (AMYLL):
contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the catalytic activity of amylase in serum, plasma (test AMY-L, 0998) and urine (test AMY-UL 0-999).
COBAS INTEGRA Cholesterol (CHOLL):
contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of total cholesterol (test CHOLL, 0-001) and HDL - cholesterol concentration in serum and plasma in clinical laboratories.
COBAS INTEGRA HDL - Cholesterol Application (HDLL):
contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of total cholesterol and HDL - cholesterol (test HDLL, 0-002) concentration in serum and plasma in clinical laboratories.
COBAS INTEGRA Gamma - Glutamyltransferase (GGTL):
contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the catalytic activity of GGT, (EC 2.3.2.2; y-glutamyl peptide: amino acid y-glutamyltransferase) in serum and plasma (test GGTL, 0-599).
COBAS INTEGRA Glucose HK Liquid (GLUCL):
contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the glucose concentration in serum, plasma (test GLUL, 0-991), urine (test GLULU, 0-992), and cerebrospinal fluid (test GLULC, 0-993).
COBAS INTEGRA Lipase (LIPL):
contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the catalytic activity of lipase in serum and plasma (test LIPL, 0-200).
{5}------------------------------------------------
COBAS INTEGRA Urea/BUN (UREAL):
contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the urea/BUN (blood urea nitrogen), in serum, plasma (test UREL, 0-003) and urine (test URELU, 0-004).
The clinical utility and methodology of each reagent cassette are further described in the test specific COBAS INTEGRA Method Manual sheets, contained in the test specific sections of this submission.
V. Summary of the technological characteristics of the new device in comparison to those of the predicate.
Tables 3-13 outline the technological characteristics (methodologies) of the COBAS INTEGRA Reagents in comparison to those of legally marketed predicate products.
VI. Brief discussion of the clinical and nonclinical tests relied on for a determination of substantial equivalence:
Tables 3-13 demonstrate the results of clinical and nonclinical studies performed using the COBAS INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes. The significant performance characteristics relied upon for a determination of substantial equivalence are summarized in this chart. This information concludes that the performance of this device is essentially equivalent to other legally marketed devices of a similar kind.
{6}------------------------------------------------
・
, de
Table 3 - Ammonia (NH3)
| COBAS INTEGRA Ammonia | Roche Reagent for Ammonia | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intended Use | quantitative determination of the | quantitative determination of the | ||
| ammonia concentration | ammonia concentration | |||
| Sample type | plasma | plasma | ||
| Methodology | enzymatic, with glutamate | enzymatic, with glutamate | ||
| dehydrogenase | dehydrogenase | |||
| Reagents | R1: Enzyme (liquid) | R1: Enzyme (liquid) | ||
| R2: Coenzyme (liquid) | R2: Coenzyme (liquid) | |||
| Calibrator | Roche Ammonia/Ethanol/CO, | Roche Ammonia/Ethanol/CO. | ||
| Calibrator | Calibrator | |||
| Controls | Roche Ammonia/Ethanol Controls | Roche Ammonia/Ethanol Controls | ||
| Performance Characteristics: | ||||
| Assay Range | 0 - 700 umol/L (0 - 1190 ug/dL ) | 0 - 700 U/L | ||
| 0 - 2,800 U/L with postdilution | ||||
| Precision: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 1 2 | Level 2 |
| Mean (umol/L) | 48.8 | 226 | ર્દિવ | 211 |
| (83.0 ug/dL) | (384 ug/dL) | |||
| %CV (within run) | 3.1 | 2.0 | 5.7 | 1.9 |
| %CV (total) | 5.2 | 2.5 | 8.8 | 5.9 |
| Sensitivity | 0.76 AA per umol/L | 0.0009 AA per umol/L | ||
| Accuracy: | ||||
| Sample size (n) | 164 | વેરૂ | ||
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.997 | 0.992 | ||
| Lin. Regression | 1.03x - 2.8 umol/L vs. Roche | 1.02x + 3.2 umol/L | ||
| Reagent for Ammonia |
{7}------------------------------------------------
Table 4 - Creatinine (CREAE)
| COBAS INTEGRA Creatinine(Enzymatic, PAP) | COBAS INTEGRA Creatinine(Kinetic, Jaffé) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intended Use | quantitative determination of the catalyticactivity of a amylase | quantitative determination of the catalyticactivity of a amylase |
| Sample type | serum, plasma and urine | serum, plasma and urine |
| Methodology | enzymatic colorimetric method (PAP) | Jaffé, buffered, kinetic method |
| Reagents | R1: Enzyme (liquid)R2: Substrate (liquid) | R1: Alkaline buffer (liquid)R2: Picric acid (liquid) |
| Calibrator | Roche Calibrator (human) | Roche Calibrator (human) |
| Controls | Roche Control Serum N and P (human) | Roche Control Serum N and P (human) |
Performance Characteristics for serum and plasma:
| Assay Range | 0 - 2000 µmol/L (0-22.6 mg/dL)0 - 20000 µmol/L (0-226 mg/dL) with post dilution | 0 - 1300 µmol/L (0-15 mg/dL)0 - 13000 µmol/L (0-1470 mg/dL) with post dilution | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| Mean (µmol/L) | 99.4(1.1mg/dL) | 535(6.0 mg/dL) | 85.5(0.97mg/dL) | 624(7.1 mg/dL) |
| %CV (within run) | 1.6 | 0.88 | 1.5 | 1.1 |
| %CV (total) | 2.2 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.5 |
| Sensitivity | 2.2 X 10-4 ΔA per µmol/L(1.9 X 10-4 ΔA per mg/dL) | 8.0 X 10-5 ΔA/min per µmol/L(1.7 X 10-3 ΔA/min per mg/dL) | ||
| Accuracy: | ||||
| Sample size (n) | 238 | 256 | ||
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.999 | 0.999 | ||
| Lin. Regression | 1.08x - 30.6 µmol/L vs. COBASINTEGRA Creatinine (Jaffé) | 0.87x - 2 µmol/L |
Performance Characteristics for urine:
| Assay Range | 0 - 40 mmol/L (0-450 mg/dL)0 - 200 mmol/L (0-2260 mg/dL) with postdilution | 0 - 32.5 mmol/L (0-367 mg/dL)0 - 130 mmol/L (0-1470 mg/dL) with postdilution | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| Mean (mmo/L) | 4.1(46.7 mg/dL) | 14.0(159 mg/dL) | 5.3(60 mg/dL) | 19(216 mg/dL) |
| %CV (within run) | 0.88 | 0.87 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| %CV (total) | 1.1 | 0.93 | ||
| Sensitivity | $5.7 X 10^{-3}$ ΔA per mmol/L( $5.1 X 10^{-2}$ ΔA per mg/dL) | Not specified in labeling | ||
| Accuracy: | ||||
| Sample size (n) | 116 | Not specified in labeling | ||
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.999 | |||
| Lin. Regression | 0.99x -0.28 mmol/L vs. COBASINTEGRA Creatinine (Jaffé) |
{8}------------------------------------------------
Lin. Regression
く
1.060 + 0.729 ng/mL
Table 5 - Digitoxin Reagent, Calibrators, and Controls (DIGIT)
| COBAS INTEGRA Digitoxin &Roche - TDM OnLine DigitoxinCalibrators & Controls | Abbott TDx/TDxFLx DigitoxinReagent, Calibrators & Controls | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intended Use | quantitative determination of digitoxin | quantitative determination of digitoxin | ||||
| Sample type | serum and heparinized plasma | serum and plasma | ||||
| Methodology | kinetic interaction of microparticles insolution (KIMS) | fluorescence polarization (FPIA) | ||||
| Reagents | R1: Anti-digitoxin monoclonal antibody(mouse) in buffer (liquid)R2: Conjugated digitoxin derivativemicroparticles in buffer (liquid) | R1: Digitoxin Antiserum (Rabbit) inbufferR2: Digitoxin Fluorescein tracer in buffer | ||||
| Calibrator Levels(in human serum) | 0, 7.5, 15, 30, 45, 65 ng/mL | 0, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, 40.0, 80.0 ng/mL | ||||
| Controls Levels(ng/mL)(in human serum) | Level 112.0 - 18.0 | Level 224.0 - 36.0 | Level 336.0 - 54.0 | Level 15.4- 9.6 | Level 212.0- 18.0 | Level 326.5 - 43.5 |
| Performance Characteristics: | ||||||
| Assay Range | 2.0 - 65 ng/mL | 2.0 - 80 ng/mL | ||||
| Precision: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
| Mean (ng/mL) | 10.4 | 19.5 | 37.1 | 7.5 | 15.0 | 35.0 |
| % CV (within run) | 6.0 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 7.05 | 4.87 | 4.72 |
| %CV (total) | 7.4 | 4.5 | 3.7 | 10.61 | 7.19 | 8.46 |
| Sensitivity | 2.0 ng/mL | 2.0 ng/mL | ||||
| Accuracy:Sample size (n) | 232 | 178 | ||||
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.973 | 0.967 |
0.945x + 1.19 ng/mL vs. Abbott
TDx/TDxFLx Digitoxin
1 039
{9}------------------------------------------------
Table 6 - Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)
| COBAS INTEGRA LSD | Roche Abuscreen RIA for LSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Intended Use | qualitative detection of LSD and itsmetabolites | detection of LSD and its metabolites |
| Sample type | urine | urine |
| Methodology | kinetic interaction of microparticles insolution (KIMS) | competitive binding to antibody of ¹²⁵I-radiolabeled antigen and unlabeledantigen |
| Cutoff | 0.5 ng/mL | 0.5 ng/mL |
| Reagents | R1: BufferR2: conjugated LSD derivativemicroparticles in bufferR3: LSD polyclonal antibody (goat) inbuffer | R1: LSD polyclonal (rabbit) antibody inbufferR2: ¹²⁵I-LSD in bufferR3: Anti-rabbit immunoglobulin serum(goat) in buffer |
| Calibrator | Roche Abuscreen Calibration Standard | Roche Abuscreen Calibration Standard |
| Controls | Roche Abuscreen Reference Controlsand Calibrator | Roche Abuscreen Reference Controlsand Calibrator |
Performance Characteristics:
ે છ
| Assay Range | 0 - 1 ng/mL | 0 - 1 ng/mL | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | L1ng/mL | L2ng/mL | L3ng/mL | L4ng/mL | |
| Mean | O.D. | O.D. | O.D. | 0.0 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1.0 | |
| %CV (within run) | 0.978 | 0.913 | 0.870 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.8 | |
| Sensitivity | 0.10 ng/mL of LSD at > 95% confidence | 0.25 ng/mL of LSD at > 99% confidence | ||||||
| Accuracy: | ||||||||
| Positive Samples | INTEGRA | GC/MS | RIA | GC/MS | RIA | |||
| +39-0 | 390 | 390 | + | 21 | 210 |
{10}------------------------------------------------
Table 7 - α- Amylase (AMYLL)
| COBAS INTEGRA α - AmylaseEPS (Liquid) | COBAS INTEGRA α - Amylase(Granulate) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intended Use | quantitative determination of thecatalytic activity of α amylase | quantitative determination of thecatalytic activity of α amylase |
| Sample type | serum, plasma and urine | serum, plasma and urine |
| Methodology | enzymatic colorimetric methodusing the substrate 4,6-ethylidene-p-nitrophenyl-α,D-maltoheptaoside | enzymatic colorimetric method with 2-chloro -4-nitrophenyl-β-D-maltoheptaoside |
| Reagents | R1: Enzyme (liquid)R2: Substrate (liquid) | R1: Enzyme (granulate)R2: Substrate (granulate) |
| Calibrator | Roche Calibrator (human) | Roche Calibrator (human) |
| Controls | Roche Control Serum N and P(human) | Roche Control Serum N and P(human) |
| Performance Characteristics for serum and plasma: | ||
| Assay Range | 0 - 2000 U/L0 - 10000 U/L with post dilution | 0 - 2000 U/L0 - 20000 U/L with post dilution |
| Precision:Mean (U/L) | Level 176 | Level 2498 |
| Level 1143 | Level 2277 |
| Mean (U/L) | 76 | 498 | 143 | 277 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| %CV (within run) | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| %CV (total) | 2.3 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| Sensitivity | 1.9 X 10-4 ΔA/min per U/L | 1.5 X 10-4 ΔA/min per U/L | ||
| Accuracy: | ||||
| Sample size (n) | 114 | 212 | ||
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.996 | 0.992 | ||
| Lin. Regression | 0.43x + 4 U/L vs. COBAS | 0.98x - 19 U/L | ||
| INTEGRA α - Amylase (granulate) |
Performance Characteristics for urine:
| Assay Range | 0 - 2000 U/L0 - 10000 U/L with post dilution | 0 - 2000 U/L0 - 20000 U/L with post dilution | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| Mean (U/L) | 183 | 603 | 22 | 302 |
| %CV (within run) | 1.3 | 2.5 | 0.56 | |
| %CV (total) | 1.7 | 1.6 | ||
| Sensitivity | 1.9 X 10-4 ΔA/min per U/L | Not specified in labeling | ||
| Accuracy: | ||||
| Sample size (n) | 150 | Not specified in labeling | ||
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.988 | |||
| Lin. Regression | 0.44x + 0 U/L vs. COBASINTEGRA α - Amylase (granulate) |
{11}------------------------------------------------
Table 8 - Cholesterol (CHOLL)
| COBAS INTEGRA Cholesterol(Liquid) | COBAS INTEGRA Cholesterol(Granulate) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intended Use | quantitative determination of totalcholesterol & HDL cholesterol | quantitative determination of totalcholesterol & HDL cholesterol |
| Sample type | serum and plasma | serum and plasma |
| Methodology | enzymatic, colorimetric methodusing cholesterol esterase,cholesterol oxidase and 4-aminoantipyrine | enzymatic, colorimetric method usingcholesterol esterase, cholesterol oxidaseand 4-aminoantipyrine |
| Reagents | R: Cholesterol esterase, cholesteroloxidase and 4-aminoantipyrine(liquid) | R: Cholesterol esterase, cholesteroloxidase and 4-aminoantipyrine (granulate) |
| Calibrator | Roche Calibrator (human) | Roche Calibrator (human) |
| Controls | Roche Control Serum N and P(human) | Roche Control Serum N and P (human) |
| Performance Characteristics: | ||
| Assay Range | 0 - 18.1 mmol/L (0 - 700 mg/dL)0 - 181 mmol/L (0 - 7000 mg/dL)with post dilution | 0 - 20.7 mmol/L (0 - 800 mg/dL)0 - 207 mmol/L (0 - 8000 mg/dL)with post dilution |
| Precision:Mean (mmol/L) | Level 1 Level 25.3 6.7(205 mg/dL) (259 mg/dL) | Level 1 Level 2 Level 35.0 6.3 8.0(94 mg/dL) (242 mg/dL) (309 mg/dL) |
| %CV (within run) | 1.3 1.1 | 1.3 1.0 2.0 |
| %CV (total) | 2.2 2.5 | 1.1 1.2 1.5 |
| Sensitivity | $8.8 X 10^{-2}$ ΔA per mmol/L( $2.3 X 10^{-3}$ ΔA per mg/dL) | $6.4 X 10^{-2}$ ΔA per mmol/L( $1.7 X 10^{-3}$ ΔA per mg/dL) |
| Accuracy: | ||
| Sample size (n) | 214 | 240 |
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.998 | 0.995 |
| Lin. Regression | 0.99x + 0.0 mmol/L vs. COBASINTEGRA Cholesterol (granulate) | 1.04x + 0.1 mmol/L |
,可以在
juund
{12}------------------------------------------------
ાં છે. -ﮧ
| Table 9 - HDL - Cholesterol Application (HDLL) | ||
|---|---|---|
| -- | ------------------------------------------------ | -- |
| COBAS INTEGRA HDL - | COBAS INTEGRA HDL - | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cholesterol Application (for use | Cholesterol Application (for use | |||
| with COBAS INTEGRA Cholesterol | with COBAS INTEGRA | |||
| Liquid Reagent) | Cholesterol Granulate Reagent) | |||
| Intended Use | quantitative determination HDLcholesterol | quantitative determination HDLcholesterol | ||
| Sample type | serum and plasma | serum and plasma | ||
| Methodology | Phosphotungstic acid pretreatment | Phosphotungstic acid pretreatment | ||
| Reagents | Roche Separating Reagent for HDL -Cholesterol used with COBASINTEGRA Cholesterol liquid reagent | Roche Separating Reagent for HDL -- Cholesterol used with COBASINTEGRA Cholesterol granulatereagent | ||
| Calibrator | Roche Calibrator (human) | Roche Calibrator (human) | ||
| Controls | Roche Control Serum N and P(human) | Roche Control Serum N and P(human) | ||
| Performance Characteristics: | ||||
| Assay Range | 0 - 5.0 mmol/L (0 - 193 mg/dL) | 0 - 5.0 mmol/L (0 - 193 mg/dL) | ||
| Precision: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| Mean (mmol/L) | 0.20(7.7 mg/dL) | 1.91(73.8mg/dL) | 0.82(31.7 mg/dL) | 1.42(54.9 mg/dL) |
| %CV (within run) | 1.51.3 | 0.26 | 1.2 | 0.85 |
| %CV (total) | 3.0 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 5.5 |
| Sensitivity | $8.8 X 10^{-2}$ ΔA per mmol/L(2.3 X $10^{-3}$ ΔA per mg/dL) | $6.4 X 10^{-2}$ ΔA per mmol/L(1.7 X $10^{-3}$ AA per mg/dL) | ||
| Accuracy: | ||||
| Sample size (n) | 240 | 232 | ||
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.999 | 0.998 | ||
| Lin. Regression | 0.99x + 0.03 mmol/L vs. COBASINTEGRA HDL - CholesterolApplication (granulate) | 0.99x - 0.05 mmol/L |
043 1
{13}------------------------------------------------
| COBAS INTEGRA GGTL(Liquid) | COBAS INTEGRA GGT(Granulate) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intended Use | quantitative determination of thecatalytic activity of GGT | quantitative determination of thecatalytic activity of GGT |
| Sample type | serum and plasma | serum and plasma |
| Methodology | kinetic method - Szasz-Persjun | kinetic method - Szasz-Persjun |
| Reagents | R1: Buffer (liquid)R2: L-γ-glutamyl-3-carboxy-4-nitroanilide (liquid) | R1: Buffer (granulate)R2: L-γ-glutamyl-3-carboxy-4-nitroanilide (granulate) |
| Calibrator | Roche Calibrator (human) | Roche Calibrator (human) |
| Controls | Roche Control Serum N and P(human) | Roche Control Serum N and P(human) |
| Performance Characteristics: | ||
| Assay Range | 0 - 600 U/L0 - 6000 U/L with post dilution | 0 - 700 U/L0 - 7000 U/L with post dilution |
| Precision: | Level 1 Level 2 | Level 1 Level 2 |
| Mean (U/L) | 21 428 | 37.9 345 |
| %CV (within run) | 0.83 0.54 | 0.67 0.46 |
| %CV (total) | 2.8 1.5 | 1.2 1.4 |
| Sensitivity | $6.8 X 10^4 ΔA/min per U/L$ | $5.0 X 10^4 ΔA/min per U/L$ |
| Accuracy: | ||
| Sample size (n) | 196 | 238 |
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.999 | 0.998 |
| Lin. Regression | 1.00x - 1.2 U/L vs. COBAS | 1.00x + 0 U/L |
| INTEGRA GGTL (granulate) |
Table 10 - Gamma-Glutamyltransferase (GGTL)
{14}------------------------------------------------
- 14
Table 11 - Glucose (GLUCL)
| COBAS INTEGRA Glucose(Liquid) | COBAS INTEGRA Glucose(Granulate) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intended Use | quantitative determination ofglucose | quantitative determination of glucose |
| Sample type | serum, plasma, urine andCerebrospinal fluid (CSF) | serum, plasma, urine andCerebrospinal fluid (CSF) |
| Methodology | enzymatic reference method withhexokinase | enzymatic reference method withhexokinase |
| Reagents | R: Enzyme (liquid) | R1: Buffer (granulate)R2: Enzyme (granulate) |
| Calibrator | Roche Calibrator (human) | Roche Calibrator (human) |
| Controls | Roche Control Serum N and P(human) | Roche Control Serum N and P(human) |
Performance Characteristics for serum and plasma:
| Assay Range | 0 - 40 mmol/L (0-720 mg/dL)0 - 400 mmol/L (0-7200 mg/dL) withpost dilution | 0 - 40 mmol/L (0-720 mg/dL)0 - 400 mmol/L (0-7200 mg/dL) withpost dilution | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| Mean (mmol/L) | 5.3 | 33.2 | 5.6 | 19.7 |
| (96 mg/dL) | (598 mg/dL) | (101mg/dL) | (355 mg/dL) | |
| %CV (within run) | 1.7 | 0.72 | 1.2 | 0.97 |
| %CV (total) | 2.6 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.89 |
| Sensitivity | 5.4 X 10-2 ΔA per mmol/L | 9.3 X 10-2 ΔA per mmol/L | ||
| (3.0 x 10-3 ΔA per mg/dL) | (5.2 X 10-3 ΔA per mg/dL) | |||
| Accuracy: | ||||
| Sample size (n) | 220 | 254 | ||
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.999 | 0.997 | ||
| Lin. Regression | 1.05x - 0.2 mmol/L vs. COBASINTEGRA Glucose (granulate) | 0.98x + 0.1 mmol/L |
{15}------------------------------------------------
Table 11 - Glucose - Continued
| Performance Characteristics for urine: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assay Range | 0 - 40 mmol/L (0-720 mg/dL)0~ 400 mmol/L (0-7200 mg/dL) withpost dilution | 0 - 16 mmol/L (0-288 mg/dL)0 - 160 mmol/L (0-2880 mg/dL) withpost dilution | ||
| Precision: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| Mean (mmol/L) | 1.7(31 mg/dL) | 37.1(668 mg/dL) | 0.27(4.9 mg/dL) | 0.48(8.6 mg/dL) |
| %CV (within run) | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 0.99 |
| %CV (total) | 4.3 | 2.9 | ||
| Sensitivity | $5.4 X 10^2$ ΔA per mmol/L(3.0 x $10^{-3}$ ΔA per mg/dL) | $2.2 X 10^1$ ΔA per mmol/L(1.3 X $10^2$ ΔA per mg/dL) | ||
| Accuracy: | ||||
| Sample size (n) | 120 | Not specified in labeling | ||
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.999 | |||
| Lin. Regression | 1.01x -0.02 mmol/L vs. COBASINTEGRA Glucose (granulate) | |||
| Performance Characteristics for CSF: | ||||
| Assay Range | 0 - 40 mmol/L (0-720 mg/dL)0 - 400 mmol/L (0-7200 mg/dL) withpost dilution | 0 - 20 mmol/L (0-360 mg/dL)0 - 360 mmol/L (0-3600 mg/dL) withpost dilution | ||
| Precision: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| Mean (mmol/L) | 1.7(31 mg/dL) | 3.3(59 mg/dL) | 4.7(85 mg/dL) | 10.3(186 mg/dL) |
| %CV (within run) | 1.6 | 1.8 | 0.57 | 0.23 |
| %CV (total) | 2.3 | 1.9 | ||
| Sensitivity | $5.4 X 10^2$ ΔA per mmol/L(3.0 x $10^{-3}$ ΔA per mg/dL) | $1.8 X 10^1$ ΔA per mmol/L(1.0 x $10^2$ ΔA per mg/dL) | ||
| Accuracy: | ||||
| Sample size (n) | 212 | Not specified in labeling | ||
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.999 | |||
| Lin. Regression | 1.02x -0.17 mmol/L vs. COBASINTEGRA Glucose (granulate) |
{16}------------------------------------------------
, (4)
Table 12 - Lipase (LIPL)
| COBAS INTEGRA Lipase(Liquid) | COBAS INTEGRA Lipase(Granulate) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intended Use | quantitative determination of thecatalytic activity of lipase | quantitative determination of thecatalytic activity of lipase |
| Sample type | serum and plasma | serum and plasma |
| Methodology | turbidimetric method with triolein | turbidimetric method with triolein |
| Reagents | R: triolein and colipase (liquid) | R: triolein and colipase (granulate) |
| Calibrator | Roche Calibrator (human) | Roche Calibrator (human) |
| Controls | Roche Control Serum N and P(human) | Roche Control Serum N and P(human) |
| Performance Characteristics: | ||
| Assay Range | 0 - 600 U/L0 - 3000 U/L with post dilution | 0 - 700 U/L0 - 3500 U/L with post dilution |
| Precision: | Level 1 Level 2 | Level 1 Level 2 |
| Mean (U/L) | 126 515 | 116 550 |
| %CV (within run) | 1.9 1.3 | 1.7 2.1 |
| %CV (total) | 3.1 2.9 | 4.6 3.7 |
| Sensitivity | 6.4 X 10-5 ΔA/min per U/L | 5.6 X 10-5 ΔA/min per U/L |
| Accuracy: | ||
| Sample size (n) | 198 | 262 |
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.976 | 0.976 |
| Lin. Regression | 0.82x + 16 U/L vs. COBASINTEGRA Lipase (granulate) | 1.06x - 7 U/L |
1 047
{17}------------------------------------------------
Table 13 -Urea/BUN (UREAL)
| COBAS INTEGRA UREA/BUN(Liquid) | COBAS INTEGRA UREA/BUN(Granulate) | |
|---|---|---|
| Intended Use | quantitative determination of urea/BUN | quantitative determination of urea/BUN |
| Sample type | serum, plasma and urine | serum, plasma and urine |
| Methodology | kinetic test with urease and glutamatedehydrogenase | kinetic test with urease and glutamatedehydrogenase |
| Reagents | R: urease and glutamate dehydrogenase (liquid) | R: urease and glutamate dehydrogenase (granulate) |
| Calibrator | Roche Calibrator (human) | Roche Calibrator (human) |
| Controls | Roche Control Serum N and P (human) | Roche Control Serum N and P (human) |
Performance Characteristics for serum and plasma:
| Assay Range | 0 - 40 mmol/L (0-12 mg/dL)0 - 400 mmol/L (0-2400 mg/dL) with postdilution | 0 - 55 mmol/L (0-330 mg/dL)0 - 550 mmol/L (0-3300 mg/dL) with postdilution | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 2 |
| Mean (mmol/L) | 4.1(24.6 mg/dL) | 31.0(186 mg/dL) | 6.9(41.4 mg/dL) | 19.9(119 mg/dL) |
| %CV (within run) | 2.3 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 1.0 |
| %CV (total) | 3.9 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 2.3 |
| Sensitivity | $2.2 X 10^{-2}$ ΔA/min per mmol/L( $3.3 X 10^{-3}$ ΔA/min per mg/dL) | $6.8 X 10^{-3}$ ΔA/min per mmol/L( $1.1 X 10^{-3}$ ΔA/min per mg/dL) | ||
| Accuracy: | ||||
| Sample size (n) | 236 | 234 | ||
| Corr. Coefficient (r) | 0.999 | 0.999 | ||
| Lin. Regression | 1.00x + 0.1 mmol/L vs. COBASINTEGRA Urea/BUN (granulate) | 1.01x + 0.30 mmol/L |
Performance Characteristics for urine:
| Assay Range | 0 - 2000 mmol/L (0-12 g/dL)0 - 6000 mmol/L (0-36 g/dL) with postdilution | 0 - 2200 mmol/L (0-13.2 g/dL)0 - 5500 mmol/L (0-33 g/dL) with postdilution | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision:Mean (mmo/L)%CV (within run) | Level 1421(2.53 g/dL)1.3 | Level 2679(4.08 g/dL)1.2 | Level 173(438 mg/dL)0.99 | Level 2345(2072 mg/dL)0.6 |
| %CV (total)Sensitivity | 1.81.82.0 X 10-2 ΔA/min per mmol/L(3.3 X 10-2 ΔA/min per g/dL) | Not specified in labeling | ||
| Accuracy:Sample size (n)Corr. Coefficient (r)Lin. Regression | 1200.9991.0X + 1.3 mmol/L vs. COBAS INTEGRAUrea/BUN (granulate) | Not specified in labeling |
{18}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/18/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with its wings spread, and the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" are arranged in a circle around the eagle. The logo is black and white and has a simple, clean design. The eagle is facing to the right.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
AUG 12 1997
Ms. Maria Feijoo Regulatory Affairs Associate Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc. 1080 U.S. Highway 202 Somerville, NJ 08876-3771
Re: K972250 Roche COBAS® INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes & Ancillary Reagents Regulatory Class: II JFJ, CDQ, CDT, CET, CFR, CGX, CHH, LAS, DLJ, Product Code: DLB, JIF, JQB, LFM June 13, 1997 Dated: Received: June 16, 1997
Dear Ms. Feijoo:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions The general controls provisions of the Act of the Act. include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major requlations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the current Good Manufacturing Practice requirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical General requlation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, Devices: through periodic (QS) inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP requlation may result in regulatory In addition, FDA may publish further announcements action. concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal Laws or Requlations.
{19}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770) 488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510 (k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Litman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{20}------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 4
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name: Roche COBAS® INTEGRA Reagent Cassettes for:
- l. Ammonia
-
- xAmylase EPS (liquid reagent)
-
- Cholesterol (liquid reagent)
-
- HDL Cholesterol Application
-
- Creatinine (enzymatic)
-
- Digitoxin
-
- Gamma-Glutamyltransferaste (liquid reagent)
-
- Glucose HK (liquid reagent)
-
- Lipase (liquid reagent)
-
- Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)
-
- Urea (liquid reagent)
Ancillary Reagents:
-
- Roche TDM OnLine Digitoxin Calibrators
-
- Roche TDM OnLine Digitoxin Controls
Indications for Use:
COBAS INTEGRA Ammonia (NH3): !.
contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the ammonia concentration in plasma (test NH3, 0-045).
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
ision Sign-Off)
- of Clinical Laboratory Devices
Educator
OR
{21}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 of 4
510(k) Number (if known)
Indications for Use (continued):
- COBAS INTEGRA aAmylase EPS (AMYLL): 2. contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the catalytic activity of amylase in serum, plasma (test AMY-L, 0998) and urine (test AMY-UL 0-999).
- COBAS INTEGRA Cholesterol (CHOLL): 3. દ્ધ contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of total cholesterol (test CHOLL, 0-001) and HDL cholesterol concentration in serum and plasma in clinical laboratories.
- COBAS INTEGRA HDL Cholesterol Application (HDLL): 4. contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of total cholesterol and HDL - cholesterol (test HDLL, 0-002) concentration in serum and plasma in clinical laboratories.
- ડ. COBAS INTEGRA Creatinine Enzymatic (CREAE): contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the creatinine concentration in serum (test CREAE, 0-014), and urine (test CREEU, 0-114).
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
{22}------------------------------------------------
Page 3 of 4
510(k) Number (if known)
Indications for Use (continued):
- COBAS INTEGRA Digitoxin (DIGIT): 6. contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of digitoxin in serum or heparinized plasma (test DIGIT 0-259).
- COBAS INTEGRA Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGTL): 7. contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the catalytic activity of GGT, (EC 2.3.2.2; y-glutamyl peptide: amino acid y-glutamyltransferase) in serum and plasma (test GGTL, 0-599).
- COBAS INTEGRA Glucose HK Liquid (GLUCL): 8.
contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the glucose concentration in serum, plasma (test GLUL, 0-991), urine (test GLULU, 0-992), and cerebrospinal fluid (test GLULC, 0-993).
COBAS INTEGRA Lipase (LIPL): contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the catalytic activity of lipase in serum and plasma (test LIPL, 0-200).
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH. Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
{23}------------------------------------------------
Page 4 of of a イ
510(k) Number (if known)
Indications for Use (continued):
- COBAS INTEGRA Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) 10. contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the qualitative determination of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) in urine (test LSD, 0-001)
- COBAS INTEGRA Urea/BUN (UREAL): 11. contains an in vitro diagnostic reagent system intended for use on COBAS INTEGRA for the quantitative determination of the urea/BUN (blood urea nitrogen), in serum, plasma (test UREL, 0-003) and urine (test URELU, 0-004).
- Roche TDM OnLine Digitoxin Calibrators: 12. are intended for use with the Roche reagents for Digitoxin and the COBAS Chemistry systems for the quantitative determination of digitoxin in serum and plasma.
-
- Roche TDM OnLine Digitoxin Controls: are quality control samples intended for use on COBAS chemistry systems with Roche reagents and calibrators for the quantitative determination of digitoxin assays.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
§ 862.1070 Amylase test system.
(a)
Identification. An amylase test system is a device intended to measure the activity of the enzyme amylase in serum and urine. Amylase measurements are used primarily for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas).(b)
Classification. Class II.