(29 days)
The Empty Fluid Container is used to hold an admixture of compatible fluids for intravenous administration to a patient. Medication transfer in and out of the container is done using aseptic technique.
The eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (EFC) is a sterile, nonpyrogenic, single-use intravenous (IV) bag constructed from flexible, non-PVC film. It is designed for the preparation and administration of IV fluids and is intended for disposal after a single use.
Two previously cleared subgroups include:
- eZSURE™ EFC with Needle-Free Valve (NFV) Additive Port (K223674)
- eZSURE™ EFC with ProSeal™ Injection Site Additive Port (K241442)
Both subgroups are currently available in 100 mL, 250 mL, and 500 mL capacities. This Submission introduces a new 1,000 mL capacity option for each subgroup.
Each EFC consists of a flexible plastic film bag with two (2) ports:
- Additive (filling) port – for introducing compatible fluids
- Spiking (administration/access) port – for accessing the infusate using a standard IV spike
The NFV model features a self-sealing needle-free valve additive port compatible with male Luer lock syringes. The Injection Site model incorporates a closed-system injection site with a double elastomeric membrane, compatible with the ProSeal™ Injector, which is also compatible with male Luer lock syringes. Both configurations support secure medication addition and maintain a sealed system after device removal.
The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter describes a medical device, the eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container, which is an IV bag. The submission primarily focuses on the device's technical characteristics and performance, particularly concerning the introduction of a new 1,000 mL capacity option.
Based on the provided document, the device in question (eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container) is a Class II medical device (an I.V. container). The validation described heavily relies on bench testing and conformance to established international and national standards rather than clinical studies involving human patients or complex AI algorithms requiring extensive ground truth establishment and multi-reader studies.
Therefore, the acceptance criteria and study that proves the device meets them are focused on these engineering and biocompatibility aspects.
Here's the breakdown as requested, tailored to the information available in the 510(k) letter:
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container
The acceptance criteria for this device are primarily based on meeting the requirements of various recognized national and international standards related to IV containers, fluid transfer, and biocompatibility. The "study" proving acceptance consists of a series of bench tests and evaluations against these standards.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Since this is a physical medical device (an IV container) with an extension of capacity, the performance criteria are primarily related to its physical and material properties, and its ability to safely contain and dispense fluids. The provided document details a comprehensive set of tests performed.
| Category | Acceptance Criteria (Standard Reference) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| I. Functional Performance | ||
| Physical Integrity & Durability | - Resistance to temperature, pressure, and fluid leakage (ISO 15747:2018, Annex A.3) - Accelerated aging of above tests (ASTM F1980-21) - Resistance to dropping (ISO 15747:2018, Annex A.4) - Accelerated aging of above test (ASTM F1980-21) - Hanger tensile strength (ISO 15747:2018, Annex A.11) - Accelerated aging of above tests (ASTM F1980-21) | Conformant: All specified tests were performed on the Subject device (1000 mL capacity) and leveraged data from predicate devices. The Submitter's Comment indicates that functional testing was conducted and data summarized, concluding that performance results met intended use, and determined the difference in volume to be insignificant. |
| Additive Port (Common) | - Infusion container transparency (ISO 15747:2018) - Water vapor impermeability (ISO 15747:2018) - Access port cover test (ISO 15747:2018) - Access port penetration ability of insertion point (ISO 15747:2018) - Access port adhesion strength of infusion device and impermeability of insertion point (ISO 15747:2018) - Access port liquid tightness of insertion point (ISO 15747:2018) - Identification test (ISO 15747:2018) - Raw container and test fluids requirements (ISO 15747:2018) - Impermeability to microorganism and migration (ISO 15747:2018) - 7-day microbial ingress (FDA guidance and AAMI CN27:2021) | Conformant: These tests were performed with the NFV filling port version (under K223674) or demonstrated to be equivalent. Results implied conformance, as the submission states no substantial differences raised concerns and performance met intended use. |
| Additive Port (ProSeal™ Specific) | - Additive port air and liquid tightness (ISO 15747:2018) - Impermeability to microorganism (ISO 15747:2018) - Additive port positive pressure fluid leakage (ISO 80369-7:2021) - Sub-atmospheric pressure air leakage (ISO 80369-7:2021) - Stress cracking (ISO 80369-7:2021) - Resistance to separation from axial load (ISO 80369-7:2021) - Resistance to unscrewing (ISO 80369-7:2021) - Resistance to overriding (ISO 80369-7:2021) - Device leakage integrity (ISO 8536-4:2019) - Vapor containment test (NIOSH 2016 draft protocol) - Microbial ingress (FDA guidance and AAMI CN27:2021) | Conformant: These tests were performed with the Injection Site filling port version (under K241442 and K240433) or demonstrated to be equivalent. Results implied conformance, as the submission states no substantial differences raised concerns and performance met intended use. |
| II. Biocompatibility | - Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5:2009) - Sensitization (ISO 10993-10:2010) - Intracutaneous reactivity (ISO 10993-23:2021) - Acute systemic toxicity (ISO 10993-11:2017) - Subacute/subchronic systemic toxicity (ISO 10993-11:2017) - In-vitro hemolysis (ISO 10993-4:2017) - Material mediated pyrogenicity (ISO 10993-11:2017) - Chemical characterization and toxicological risk assessment (ISO 10993-18:2020 & ISO 10993-17:2002) - Particulate matter testing (ISO 15747:2018 & USP <788>) - EO residues limits (ISO 10993-7:2008, Amd.1:2019) | Acceptable Biological Risks Established: Testing was conducted under predicate devices (K223674/S001, K241442, K240433) and the Subject device. The Submitter's Comment explicitly states: "The biocompatibility testing and chemical characterization as well as risk analysis data on cleared device were evaluated for the Subject device... The difference was determined to be insignificant as results were determined to have met the device's biological safety specifications." Testing also confirmed compliance with EO residue limits for special patient populations. |
| III. Sterility, Shipping, and Shelf-Life | - Sterilization validation (ISO 11135:2014) - Simulated shipping testing (ASTM D 4169-16) - Package integrity (ASTM F1980-21, ASTM F88/F88M-21, ASTM F1929-23, EN 868-5:2009) - Pyrogen tests (ANSI/AAMI ST72/2019, USP 42-NF 37 <151>, <161>, <85>) - Shelf-life validation (3 years, ASTM 1980-21) | Conformant: The Subject device complies with ISO 11135:2014. Shipping and package integrity tests leveraged data from prior submissions (K151650/S004, K223674/S001, K151650). Pyrogen tests performed under K151650 will be conducted on every lot. A 3-year shelf-life was validated on the Subject device. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and the Data Provenance
- Sample Size for Test Set: The document does not explicitly state the numerical sample size (e.g., "n=X units") for each specific test conducted on the 1000 mL subject device. It lists the types of tests performed and the standards they adhere to. For physical device testing, sample sizes are typically defined by the standards themselves (e.g., a certain number of units per lot, or a statistical sampling plan to achieve confidence). The statement "functional testing have been conducted and their data are summarized in section VII.A" implies sufficient samples were used to meet the standards' requirements.
- Data Provenance: The data provenance is primarily from bench testing conducted by the manufacturer or authorized test labs. The document mentions leveraging "relevant testing data from the Predicate devices and the existing device: K223674/S001, K241442 and K230343/S001" for many of the functional and biocompatibility tests, with specific tests performed "On Subject device" (the new 1000 mL version). The country of origin of the data is not specified beyond the company being in Singapore. All data is retrospective in the sense that it's historical data generated for the submission, but the tests themselves were designed to prospectively evaluate the device's performance against defined criteria.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and the Qualifications of Those Experts
This type of device (an IV container) does not typically involve expert "ground truth" establishment in the way AI/radiology devices do. The "ground truth" is established by adherence to pre-defined, internationally recognized engineering and scientific standards (e.g., ISO, ASTM, USP) and their associated test methods. Experts involved would be engineers, material scientists, and quality assurance professionals responsible for designing, executing, and interpreting these standardized tests. Their qualifications would be in engineering, chemistry, biology, or related fields, with experience in medical device testing and regulatory compliance. The document does not specify the number or specific qualifications of these individuals.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. As described above, the "ground truth" is based on established technical standards, not on subjective human interpretation requiring adjudication. Performance is measured against quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria defined by these standards.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
No, a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is relevant for diagnostic devices, especially those involving image interpretation (e.g., AI in radiology), where human performance (with and without AI assistance) needs to be assessed. This device is a physical IV container and does not involve human readers for diagnostic interpretation.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
No, a standalone algorithm performance study was not done. This device is a physical medical device, not an AI algorithm.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth used is primarily based on:
- Engineering and Performance Standards: The device's ability to meet specified physical, mechanical, and chemical properties as defined by ISO, AAMI, ASTM, and USP standards.
- Biocompatibility Standards: The device's materials and their extracts demonstrating acceptable biological compatibility as per ISO 10993 series.
- Sterility Assurance: Validation of the sterilization process and maintenance of sterility as per ISO 11135.
This is fundamentally different from ground truth for AI algorithms which might use expert consensus or pathology results.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not an AI algorithm that requires a "training set" of data.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device.
FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter - eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container
Page 1
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
Doc ID # 04017.08.00
August 1, 2025
Epic Medical Pte. Ltd.
Freddie Lee
CEO/MD, Chief Executive Officer/Managing Director
105 Cecil Street #20-04, The Octagon
Singapore, 069534
Singapore
Re: K252094
Trade/Device Name: eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5025
Regulation Name: I.V. container
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: KPE, ONB
Dated: July 3, 2025
Received: July 3, 2025
Dear Freddie Lee:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
Page 2
K252094 - Freddie Lee Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Page 3
K252094 - Freddie Lee Page 3
Sincerely,
David Wolloscheck -S
David Wolloscheck, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT3C: Division of Drug Delivery and
General Hospital Devices, and
Human Factors
OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn,
General Hospital, and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
Page 4
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23) Page 1 of 1 PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known)
K252094
Device Name
eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Empty Fluid Container is used to hold an admixture of compatible fluids for intravenous administration to a patient. Medication transfer in and out of the container is done using aseptic technique.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☒ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
Page 5
K252094 – 510(k) Summary
I. Submitter
Epic Medical Pte. Ltd.
105 Cecil Street #20-04
The Octagon
Singapore 069534
Phone: +65 9635 2618 / +66 81 761 5292
Contact Person: Mr. Freddie LEE, Chief Executive Officer/ Managing Director
Date Prepared: August 1, 2025
Content and Format: Prepared in accordance with 21 CFR 807.92
Type of Submission: Special
II. Subject Device
510(k) Number: K252094
Trade/ Device Name: eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container
Common/ Usual Name: Empty I.V. bag
Regulation Number: I.V. container
Regulation Name: 21 CFR 880.5025
Regulatory Class: Class: II
Product Code: KPE, ONB
III. Predicate
| K223674 | K241442 | |
|---|---|---|
| Trade/ Device Name: | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (models 426030, 426040, 426110) | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container with ProSeal™ Injection Site |
| Common/ Usual Name: | Empty I.V. bag | Empty I.V. bag |
| Regulation Number: | I.V. container | I.V. container |
| Regulation Name: | 21 CFR 880.5025 | 21 CFR 880.5025 |
| Regulatory Class: | Class: II | Class: II |
| Product Code: | KPE | KPE, ONB |
Page 6
IV. Purpose of Submission and Device Description
The eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (EFC) is a sterile, nonpyrogenic, single-use intravenous (IV) bag constructed from flexible, non-PVC film. It is designed for the preparation and administration of IV fluids and is intended for disposal after a single use.
Two previously cleared subgroups include:
- eZSURE™ EFC with Needle-Free Valve (NFV) Additive Port (K223674)
- eZSURE™ EFC with ProSeal™ Injection Site Additive Port (K241442)
Both subgroups are currently available in 100 mL, 250 mL, and 500 mL capacities. This Submission introduces a new 1,000 mL capacity option for each subgroup.
Each EFC consists of a flexible plastic film bag with two (2) ports:
- Additive (filling) port – for introducing compatible fluids
- Spiking (administration/access) port – for accessing the infusate using a standard IV spike
The NFV model features a self-sealing needle-free valve additive port compatible with male Luer lock syringes. The Injection Site model incorporates a closed-system injection site with a double elastomeric membrane, compatible with the ProSeal™ Injector, which is also compatible with male Luer lock syringes. Both configurations support secure medication addition and maintain a sealed system after device removal.
V. Indications for Use Statement
The Empty Fluid Container is used to hold an admixture of compatible fluids for intravenous administration to a patient. Medication transfer in and out of the container is done using aseptic technique.
VI. Comparison of Intended Use & Technological Characteristics
The Subject devices and the Predicate devices share the following characteristics:
Intended Use comparison
There was no difference that would alter the overall intended use of the Subject devices, compared to the Predicate devices, with respect to:
- Indications for use statements
- Intended user population/ intended use environment
- Intended drug type
- Prescription use or over-the-counter use
- IV bag access components
Technological Characteristics comparison
Equivalencies – Technology & Design
The Subject and Predicate devices exhibit the same design characteristics, with their respective filling port types. No substantial differences were identified that would raise concerns regarding safety or performance. The shared characteristics are listed below:
- Principles of operation
- Technology and design of the empty container
- Material of empty container body
- Materials of additive (filling) port (per type vs. the respective Predicate device)
- Intended filling device (per type vs. the respective Predicate device)
- Material of spiking (administration) port
- Biocompatibility
- Primary package top & bottom webs
- Sterilization process
- Shelf-life validation
- Single-use or reusable
- Labeling specifications
Page 7
There were no substantial differences compared to the Predicate devices listed in Table 1 and Table 2. The respective evaluations – summarized in the respective Submitter's Comment at the bottom row of each table – concluded that the identified difference does not pose any safety or performance concerns for either device
Table 1: Comparison of characteristics for eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with NFV filling port)
| Characteristics compared | Predicate Device (K223674) | Subject Device (K252094) | Comparative evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with NFV filling port) | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with NFV filling port) | ||
| Intended use and Indications for Use statement | The Empty Fluid Container is used to hold an admixture of compatible fluids for intravenous administration to a patient. Medication transfer in and out of the container is done using aseptic technique. | Same | |
| Intended user population | Adequately trained health care professionals or pharmacists | Same | |
| Intended use environment | Clinical setting | Same | |
| Intended drug type | Parenteral drugs | Same | |
| Prescription use or over-the-counter use | ℞ only | Same | |
| IV bag access components | Device has 2 access points: 1. Additive port/filling port 2. Spiking/administration/access port, IV spike bag access for IV set/IV line | Same | |
| Principles of operation - NFV filling port | The empty bags are filled by connecting transfer devices, e.g., through standard male Luer lock syringes (without needle) or automated filling devices. The additive port is a self-sealing needle-free female luer lock connector, no different from standard needle-free filling port devices of market-cleared IV sets. Silicone valve of the additive port self-seals/re-seals when mating component devices are disconnected from one another. | Same | |
| Spiking (administration/access) port | IV set or IV line is attached through the spiking (administration) port to dispense IV therapy using a standard spike and tubing | Same |
Page 8
Table 1: Comparison of characteristics for eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with NFV filling port)
| Characteristics compared | Predicate Device (K223674) | Subject Device (K252094) | Comparative evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with NFV filling port) | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with NFV filling port) | ||
| Technology and design of the empty container | The bag is manufactured by welding a plastic attachment to the bag body and assembling the bottom with entry and exit connectors/ ports | Same | |
| Material of empty fluid container body | Sealed Air Corp's Medical Packaging Film, Nexcel® Film, Grade M315, Polyolefin | Same | |
| Materials of additive (filling) port | Polypropylene, Polycarbonate, Liquid Silicone Rubber | Same | |
| Intended filling device | Syringe or transfer device with Male Luer lock tip | Same | |
| Material of spiking (administration) port | Thermoplastic elastomer | Same | |
| Maximum volumes | 100 mL, 200 mL, 500 mL | 1,000 mL | Different see Comment #1 |
| Biocompatibility | Acceptable biological risks established by demonstrating that the device meets ISO 10993-1 | Same | |
| Primary package top & bottom webs | Medical grade paper and medical plastic film, heat sealed | Same | |
| Sterilization process | Ethylene Oxide (EO), SAL 10⁻⁶ | Same | |
| Shelf-life validation | 3 years (36 months) | Same | |
| Single use or reusable | Single use only | Same | |
| Labeling specifications | Met the requirements specified in 21 CFR 801 | Same |
Submitter's Comment (Table 1)
Comment #1
Subject device is different from the Predicate device in its maximum volume capacity. The difference between the Subject device and Predicate device did not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness as functional testing have been conducted and their data are summarized in section VII.A. The difference was determined to be insignificant as performance results were determined to have met the intended use. The biocompatibility testing and chemical characterization as well as risk analysis data on cleared device were evaluated for the Subject device and are summarized in section VII.B. The difference was determined to be insignificant as results were determined to have met the device's biological safety specifications
Page 9
Table 2: Comparison of characteristic for eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with ProSeal™ Injection Site)
| Characteristics compared | Predicate Device (K241442) | Subject Device (K252094) | Comparative evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with ProSeal™ Injection Site) | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with ProSeal™ Injection Site) | ||
| Intended use and Indications for Use statement | The Empty Fluid Container is used to hold an admixture of compatible fluids for intravenous administration to a patient. Medication transfer in and out of the container is done using aseptic technique. | Same | |
| Intended user population | Adequately trained health care professionals or pharmacists | Same | |
| Intended use environment | Clinical setting | Same | |
| Intended drug type | Parenteral drugs | Same | |
| Prescription use or over-the-counter use | ℞ only | Same | |
| IV bag access components | Device has 2 access points: 1. Additive port/filling port 2. Spiking/administration/access port, IV spike bag access for IV set/IV line | Same | |
| Principles of operation - Injection site filling port | The empty bags are filled by connecting transfer devices, e.g., through standard male Luer lock syringes (without needle) or automated filling devices, attached to the ProSeal™ Injector. The additive port is a self-sealing closed system ProSeal™ Injection Site. Membrane of the additive port self-seals/re-seals when mating component devices are disconnected from one another. | Same | |
| Spiking (administration/access) port | IV set or IV line is attached through the spiking (administration) port to dispense IV therapy using a standard spike and tubing | Same | |
| Technology and design of the empty container | The bag is manufactured by welding a plastic attachment to the bag body and assembling the bottom with entry and exit connectors/ ports | Same |
Page 10
Table 2: Comparison of characteristic for eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with ProSeal™ Injection Site)
| Characteristics compared | Predicate Device (K241442) | Subject Device (K252094) | Comparative evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with ProSeal™ Injection Site) | eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (with ProSeal™ Injection Site) | ||
| Material of empty fluid container body | Sealed Air Corp's Medical Packaging Film, Nexcel® Film, Grade M315, Polyolefin | Same | |
| Materials of additive (filling) port | Polypropylene, Polyisoprene Rubber (IR) | Same | |
| Intended filling device | ProSeal™ Injector or ProSeal™ Injector Plus (cleared K241071) Male Luer Lock tip | Same | |
| Material of spiking (administration) port | Thermoplastic elastomer | Same | |
| Maximum volumes | 100 mL, 200 mL, 500 mL | 1,000 mL | Different see Comment #1 |
| Biocompatibility | Acceptable biological risks established by demonstrating that the device meets ISO 10993-1 | Same | |
| Primary package top & bottom webs | Medical grade paper and medical plastic film, heat sealed | Same | |
| Sterilization process | Ethylene Oxide (EO), SAL 10⁻⁶ | Same | |
| Shelf-life validation | 3 years (36 months) | Same | |
| Single use or reusable | Single use only | Same | |
| Labeling specifications | Met the requirements specified in 21 CFR 801 | Same |
Submitter's Comment (Table 2)
Comment #1
Subject device is different from the Predicate device in its maximum volume capacity. The difference between the Subject device and Predicate device did not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness as functional testing have been conducted and their data are summarized in section VII.A. The difference was determined to be insignificant as performance results were determined to have met the intended use. The biocompatibility testing and chemical characterization as well as risk analysis data on cleared device were evaluated for the Subject device and are summarized in section VII.B. The difference was determined to be insignificant as results were determined to have met the device's biological safety specifications
Page 11
VII. Performance Data Supporting Substantial Equivalence
A. Functional Performance
The Subject device was evaluated to be in conformance with the following ANSI/AAMI and ISO standards, and the product code-applicable FDA guidance document:
- ANSI/AAMI CN27:2021, General requirements for Luer activated valves (LAVs) incorporated into medical devices for intravascular applications
- ISO 80369-7:2021, Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare applications - Part 7: Connectors for intravascular or hypodermic applications
- ISO 80369-20:2015, Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare applications (Part 20: Common test methods)
- ISO 8536-4:2019, Infusion equipment for medical use - Part 4: Infusion sets for single use, gravity feed
- ISO 15747:2018, Plastic containers for intravenous injections
- ISO 22413:2021, Transfer sets for pharmaceutical preparations — Requirements and test methods
- Intravascular-Administration-Sets-Premarket-Notification-Submissions-[510(k)]---Guidance-for-Industry-and-FDA-Staff
Bench performance verifications and validations were performed on the Subject device and leveraged from the relevant testing data from the Predicate devices and the existing device: K223674/S001, K241442 and K230343/S001:
On Subject device
- Resistance to temperature, pressure and fluid leakage tests per ISO 15747:2018, Annex A.3
- Accelerated aging tests per ASTM F1980-21 of above tests
- Resistance to dropping test per ISO 15747:2018, Annex A.4
- Accelerated aging test per ASTM F1980-21 of above test
- Hanger tensile strength test per ISO 15747:2018, Annex A.11
- Accelerated aging tests per ASTM F1980-21 of above tests
Under K223674 – NFV filling port version
- Infusion container transparency test to ISO 15747:2018
- Water vapor impermeability test to ISO 15747:2018
- Access port cover test to ISO 15747:2018
- Access port penetration ability of insertion point test to ISO 15747:2018
- Access port adhesion strength of infusion device and impermeability of the insertion point test to ISO 15747:2018
- Access port liquid tightness of the insertion point test to ISO 15747:2018
- Identification test to ISO 15747:2018
- Requirements for the raw container and test fluids test to ISO 15747:2018
- Impermeability to microorganism and migration test to ISO 15747:2018
- 7-day microbial ingress test per FDA guidance and AAMI CN27:2021
Under K241442 - Injection Site filling port version
- Additive port air and liquid tightness test to ISO 15747:2018
- Impermeability to microorganism test to ISO 15747:2018
Under K240433 - Injection Site filling port version
- Additive port positive pressure fluid leakage test to ISO 80369-7:2021
- Sub-atmospheric pressure air leakage test to ISO 80369-7:2021
- Stress cracking test to ISO 80369-7:2021
- Resistance to separation from axial load test to ISO 80369-7:2021
- Resistance to separation from unscrewing test to ISO 80369-7:2021
- Resistance to overriding to ISO 80369-7:2021
- Device leakage integrity test to ISO 8536-4:2019
- Vapor containment test per NIOSH 2016 draft protocol
- Microbial ingress test per FDA guidance and AAMI CN27:2021
Page 12
B. Biocompatibility
In accordance with ISO 10993-1:2018, the Subject device is classified as: Externally Communicating Device, Blood Path Indirect, Prolonged Contact (>24hr to 30d). The following testing were conducted under the Predicate devices and the existing device: K223674/S001, K241442, K240433; and the Subject device:
- Cytotoxicity per ISO 10993-5:2009
- Sensitization per ISO 10993-10:2010
- Intracutaneous reactivity per ISO 10993-23:2021
- Acute systemic toxicity per ISO 10993-11:2017
- Subacute/subchronic systemic toxicity per ISO 10993-11:2017
- In-vitro hemolysis per ISO 10993-4:2017
- Material mediated pyrogenicity per ISO 10993-11:2017
- Chemical characterization and toxicological risk assessment per ISO 10993-18:2020 & ISO 10993-17:2002
- Particulate matter testing per ISO 15747:2018, Plastic containers for intravenous injections and USP <788> Particulate Matter in Injections, on the Predicate devices and on the Subject device
- EO residues limits per ISO 10993-7:2008, Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 7: Ethylene oxide sterilization residuals/Technical Corrigendum 1:2009/Amd.1:2019 for neonates and infants special patient population, as defined by the amended standard's patient population categories on the Subject device
C. Sterility, Shipping, and Shelf-Life
The Subject device complies with sterilization requirements of ISO 11135:2014, Sterilization of Health Care Products – Ethylene Oxide – Part 1: Requirements for Development, Validation and Routine Control of a Sterilization Process for Medical Devices and the following testing/evaluations:
- Simulated shipping testing per ASTM D 4169-16, Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems under K151650/S004 and K223674/S001
- Package integrity tests per ASTM F1980-21, Standard guide for accelerated aging of sterile barrier systems for medical devices and Sterile Barrier Packaging Testing performed on the proposed device: Seal strength – ASTM F88/F88M-21, Standard test method for seal strength of flexible barrier materials; Dye Penetration – ASTM F1929-23, Standard test method for detecting seal leaks in porous medical device packaging by dye penetration; EN 868-5:2009, Packaging materials and systems for medical devices which are to be sterilized – Part 5: Heat and self-sealable pouches and reels of paper and plastic film construction – Requirements and test methods under K151650
- Pyrogen tests per ANSI/AAMI ST72/2019, Bacterial endotoxins – Test methods, routing monitoring, and alternatives to batch testing, USP 42-NF 37 <151>, Pyrogen test (USP rabbit test), USP 42-NF 37 <161>, Medical Devices-Bacterial Endotoxin and Pyrogen Tests, USP 42-NF 37 <85>, Bacterial Endotoxins Test under K151650 and testing will be conducted on every lot
- Shelf-life of 3 years has been validated using the FDA recognized standard, ASTM 1980-21, Standard Guide for Accelerated Aging of Sterile Barrier Systems for Medical Devices on the Subject device
VIII. Clinical Tests
Not applicable
IX. Conclusion
The difference between the Predicate and the Subject device does not raise any new or different questions of safety or effectiveness. The eZSURE™ Empty Fluid Container (EFC) is substantially equivalent to the Predicate devices (K223674 & K241442) in all aspects
§ 880.5025 I.V. container.
(a)
Identification. An I.V. container is a container made of plastic or glass used to hold a fluid mixture to be administered to a patient through an intravascular administration set.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).