(127 days)
DualView Catheter is intended for the intravascular imaging of coronary arteries and is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures.
The DualView Catheter is a catheter consisting of two assemblies: the catheter sheath and the imaging core (consisting of lens and transducer). During imaging, the imaging core rotates inside the catheter sheath to obtain a 360°image of the surface layer of the vessel wall by irradiating with near-infrared light and ultrasound. By pulling back the imaging core inside the catheter sheath, an image in the long axis direction can be obtained.
This is a rapid exchange (RX) design (short monorail) catheter, which is used with a 0.014" (0.36 mm) guidewire. The catheter is 2.6 Fr (0.86 mm) in the imaging window section and 3.0 Fr (1.01 mm) in the shaft section with an effective length of 137 cm. The catheter has a 100 cm hydrophilic coating starting from the distal end, which becomes highly lubricious when wet. The catheter has a telescoping section, and the telescoping length is 155 mm. When connected to the OPUSWAVE, the imaging core can be pulled back 150 mm in the catheter sheath. There are two radiopaque markers. The distal radiopaque marker is located 7 mm from the distal end of the catheter sheath, and the sensor radiopaque marker is located where the near-infrared light and ultrasound are emitted. Those markers allow a user to confirm the positional relationship between the distal end of the catheter and the sensor position (imaging point). There are two depth markers, one at 90 cm and the other at 100 cm from the distal end of the catheter sheath, which serves as a guide for insertion.
The transducer has an IPX7 ingress rating in accordance with IEC 60529.
The catheter is stored in the holder tube and is secured to the catheter holder. The catheter comes with the Motor Drive Unit (MDU) Cover and accessories. The MDU Cover consists of an adapter and a plastic cover sheet to maintain the sterility of the catheter and clean field. The catheter accessories consist of a connection tube with a three-way stopcock, a priming syringe, and a reservoir syringe for priming the catheter lumen with heparinized saline solution.
The provided FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter concerns the DualView Catheter, a diagnostic intravascular catheter. This document is a Summary of a Traditional 510(k) submission, which primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices based on non-clinical performance testing.
Therefore, the submission does not include a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study, standalone algorithm performance, or extensive details on ground truth establishment involving human expert consensus for a clinical test set as would be typical for an AI/ML-based device. The clearance is based on direct device performance and safety, primarily through bench testing and animal studies, not a human reader study.
Here's an analysis of the provided information, specifically addressing the questions as much as possible given the nature of this particular 510(k) (a medical device clearance, not an AI/ML algorithm clearance):
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (Based on Non-Clinical Testing):
Since this is a non-clinical device clearance, the "acceptance criteria" are the successful completion of the listed performance and safety tests, demonstrating the device meets its design specifications and is suitable for its intended use. The "reported device performance" is that it successfully met these criteria.
| Acceptance Criteria (Test Item) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Radio-detectability | Met requirements |
| Appearance of Catheter | Met requirements |
| Corrosion Resistance | Met requirements |
| Tensile Strength | Met requirements |
| Freedom from leakage | Met requirements |
| Small bore connector | Met requirements |
| Sliding resistance (Imaging window) | Met requirements |
| Particle count | Met requirements |
| Slidability of Guidewire | Met requirements |
| Bending strength | Met requirements |
| Dimensions | Met requirements |
| Imaging quality | Met requirements |
| Pullback/forward durability | Met requirements |
| Coating Integrity | Met requirements |
| Stent crossability | Met requirements |
| Simulated use – Human factor usability engineering | Met requirements |
| Software Verification and Validation | Conducted per IEC 62304 and FDA guidance ("Enhanced" level) - Met requirements |
| Electrical Safety & EMC | Compliant with IEC 60601-1, -2-18, -1-2, -2-37, and IEC 60825 - Met requirements |
| Biocompatibility | Compliant with ISO 10993-1, tested on accelerated aged devices - Met requirements |
| Sterilization | Validated per ISO 11135:2014/Amd 1:2018 (SAL of 10-6) - Met requirements |
| Animal Study (Safety) | No issues related to tissue damage and thrombus formation in coronary arteries |
| Animal Study (Performance) | System performed as intended compared to predicate devices |
Detailed Study Information (Where Applicable for this Device Type):
-
Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Test Set (Non-Clinical): The document refers to various non-clinical tests (e.g., performance testing, software V&V, electrical safety, biocompatibility, sterilization). The "sample size" for these tests would correspond to the number of catheters or test articles subjected to each specific test. This specific number is not provided in the summary but is assumed to be sufficient for each test type according to relevant standards.
- Animal Study: A "swine model" was used for both safety and performance animal studies. The specific number of animals is not provided in this summary.
- Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin for the data (e.g., test labs, animal facilities). This is a traditional 510(k) submission, and the manufacturer is Terumo Corporation (Japan), with manufacturing in Japan. Animal studies were likely prospective.
-
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- Not Applicable in the context of this 510(k). This clearance is for a medical device (catheter), not an AI/ML algorithm that requires human expert consensus for image interpretation ground truth. The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by direct physical measurements, engineering validations, and physiological outcomes in animal models against predefined specifications and safety standards.
-
Adjudication method for the test set:
- Not Applicable. Since there's no human interpretation component needing adjudication for ground truth establishment. Test outcomes are determined by objective measurements against acceptance criteria.
-
If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- No, an MRMC study was NOT done. The document explicitly states: "This 510(k) does not include data from clinical tests." MRMC studies are typically used to assess the impact of AI algorithms on human reader performance, which is not relevant for this device's non-clinical clearance pathway.
-
If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- No, not in the sense of an AI algorithm. This device does not appear to involve an AI algorithm whose performance would be assessed in a standalone manner for image interpretation or diagnosis. It is a diagnostic imaging catheter that generates images for human interpretation.
-
The type of ground truth used:
- Engineering Specifications, Physical Measurements, and Physiological Outcomes (Animal Model):
- For non-clinical performance tests (e.g., tensile strength, dimensions, imaging quality, etc.), the ground truth is the device's adherence to pre-defined engineering specifications and measurable performance characteristics.
- For biocompatibility and sterilization, the ground truth is established by adherence to relevant ISO standards and successful completion of validated tests.
- For animal studies, the "ground truth" relates to the physiological effects observed (e.g., absence of tissue injury, thrombus formation) and the successful performance of the device in a living system as intended by design, compared to predicate devices.
- Engineering Specifications, Physical Measurements, and Physiological Outcomes (Animal Model):
-
The sample size for the training set:
- Not Applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set of data.
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not Applicable. As no training set for an AI/ML algorithm is involved.
Summary:
The DualView Catheter received 510(k) clearance based on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices primarily through rigorous non-clinical performance testing and animal studies. This type of submission relies on showing that the new device meets established safety and performance standards equivalent to existing legally marketed devices, rather than a clinical study evaluating an AI algorithm's interpretive accuracy and its impact on human readers. Therefore, many of the questions pertinent to AI/ML device clearances (e.g., human expert ground truth, MRMC studies) are not applicable to this traditional medical device submission.
FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter - DualView Catheter
Page 1
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
Doc ID # 04017.08.00
June 17, 2025
Terumo Corporation
℅ Patrick McDonald
Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Terumo Medical Corporation
265 Davidson Avenue, Suite 320
Somerset, New Jersey 08873
Re: K250751
Trade/Device Name: DualView Catheter
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1200
Regulation Name: Diagnostic Intravascular Catheter
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: DQO, OBJ
Dated: June 17, 2025
Received: June 17, 2025
Dear Patrick McDonald:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Page 2
K250751 - Patrick McDonald Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
Page 3
K250751 - Patrick McDonald Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Aneesh S. Deoras -S
Aneesh Deoras
Assistant Director
Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology,
Diagnostics, and Monitoring Devices
Office of Cardiovascular Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
Page 4
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
K250751
Device Name
DualView Catheter
Indications for Use (Describe)
DualView Catheter is intended for the intravascular imaging of coronary arteries and is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☒ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
Page 5
Terumo Corporation
Traditional 510(k) –DualView Catheter
510(k) Summary
510(K) SUMMARY
A. SUBMITTER INFORMATION (807.92(a)(1))
Prepared by: Patrick McDonald
Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Terumo Medical Corporation
Tel: 732 547-9343
Fax: 410 398-6079
Prepared For: Owner/ Operator
Terumo Corporation
44-1, 2-Chome, Hatagaya
Shibuya-Ku, Tokyo
Japan 151-0072
Owner/Operator Number: 8010026
Manufacturer and Sterilization Facility (Applicant)
Ashitaka Factory of Terumo Corporation
150, Maimaigi-cho,
Fujinomiya, Shizuoka 418-0015,Japan
Registration Number: 9681834
Contact Person: Patrick McDonald
Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Terumo Medical Corporation
265 Davidson Avenue, Suite 320
Tel (732) 547-9343
Fax (410) 398-6079
Email: patrick.mcdonald@terumomedical.com
Date prepared: 17JUL2025
K250751 Page 1 of 10
Page 6
Terumo Corporation
Traditional 510(k) –DualView Catheter
510(k) Summary
B. DEVICE NAME (807.92(a)(2))
Proprietary Name: DualView Catheter
Common Name: Diagnostic Catheter
Classification Name: Diagnostic Intravascular Catheter
Classification Panel: Cardiovascular
Regulation: 21 CFR 870.1200
Classification Product Codes: DQO
Subsequent Product Code: OBJ
Classification: Class II
C. PREDICATE DEVICE (807.92(a)(3))
The legally marketed devices to which substantial equivalence is claimed are:
Primary Predicate K141769 Optis Integrated System, Dragonfly Optis Imaging Catheter
Secondary Predicate K123621 Opticross 40 MHz Coronary Imaging Catheter
D. REASON FOR 510(k) SUBMISSION
This traditional 510(k) for DualView Catheter is being submitted as this is a new medical device for the US market.
E. DEVICE DESCRIPTION (807.92(a)(4))
The DualView Catheter is a catheter consisting of two assemblies: the catheter sheath and the imaging core (consisting of lens and transducer). During imaging, the imaging core rotates inside the catheter sheath to obtain a 360°image of the surface layer of the vessel wall by irradiating with near-infrared light and ultrasound. By pulling back the imaging core inside the catheter sheath, an image in the long axis direction can be obtained.
This is a rapid exchange (RX) design (short monorail) catheter, which is used with a 0.014" (0.36 mm) guidewire. The catheter is 2.6 Fr (0.86 mm) in the imaging
K250751 Page 2 of 10
Page 7
Terumo Corporation
Traditional 510(k) –DualView Catheter
510(k) Summary
window section and 3.0 Fr (1.01 mm) in the shaft section with an effective length of 137 cm. The catheter has a 100 cm hydrophilic coating starting from the distal end, which becomes highly lubricious when wet. The catheter has a telescoping section, and the telescoping length is 155 mm. When connected to the OPUSWAVE, the imaging core can be pulled back 150 mm in the catheter sheath. There are two radiopaque markers. The distal radiopaque marker is located 7 mm from the distal end of the catheter sheath, and the sensor radiopaque marker is located where the near-infrared light and ultrasound are emitted. Those markers allow a user to confirm the positional relationship between the distal end of the catheter and the sensor position (imaging point). There are two depth markers, one at 90 cm and the other at 100 cm from the distal end of the catheter sheath, which serves as a guide for insertion.
The transducer has an IPX7 ingress rating in accordance with IEC 60529.
The catheter is stored in the holder tube and is secured to the catheter holder. The catheter comes with the Motor Drive Unit (MDU) Cover and accessories. The MDU Cover consists of an adapter and a plastic cover sheet to maintain the sterility of the catheter and clean field. The catheter accessories consist of a connection tube with a three-way stopcock, a priming syringe, and a reservoir syringe for priming the catheter lumen with heparinized saline solution.
K250751 Page 3 of 10
Page 8
Terumo Corporation
Traditional 510(k) –DualView Catheter
510(k) Summary
F. INDICATIONS FOR USE (807.92(a)(5))
DualView Catheter is intended for the intravascular imaging of coronary arteries and is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures.
G. SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE COMPARISON (807.92(a)(6))
DualView Catheter, the subject of this Traditional 510(k), is substantially equivalent in its Intended Use, Indications for Use, and Technological Characteristics to the predicates, Optis Integrated System, Dragonfly Optis Imaging Catheter (K141769) manufactured by LightLab Imaging Inc and Opticross 40 MHz Coronary Imaging Catheter (K123621) manufactured by Boston Scientific Corporation.
The comparison of the technological characteristics is summarized in Table 1.
K250751 Page 4 of 10
Page 9
Terumo Corporation
Traditional 510(k) – DualView Catheter
510(k) Summary
Table 1: Summary of Comparative Information
| Device Characteristics | Subject Device: DualView Catheter | Primary Predicate Device: Optis Integrated System, Dragonfly Optis Imaging Catheter (K141769) | Secondary Predicate Device: Opticross 40 MHz Coronary Imaging Catheter (K123621) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ashitaka Factory of Terumo Corporation | LightLab Imaging Inc | Boston Scientific Corporation |
| Intended Use | DualView Catheter is intended for the intravascular imaging of coronary arteries and is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures. | Same | Same |
| Indications for Use | DualView Catheter is intended for the intravascular imaging of coronary arteries and is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures. | The OPTIS Integrated System with C7 Dragonfly, Dragonfly DUO, or Dragonfly OPTIS Imaging Catheter is intended for the imaging of coronary arteries and is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures. The C7 Dragonfly, Dragonfly DUO, or Dragonfly OPTIS Imaging Catheter is intended for use in vessels 2.0 to 3.5 mm in diameter. The C7 Dragonfly, Dragonfly DUO, or Dragonfly OPTIS Imaging Catheter is not intended for use in the left main coronary artery or in a target vessel which has undergone a previous bypass procedure. The OPTIS Integrated | This catheter is intended for ultrasound examination of coronary intravascular pathology only. Intravascular ultrasound imaging is indicated in patients who are candidates for transluminal coronary interventional procedures. |
K250751 Page 5 of 10
Page 10
Terumo Corporation
Traditional 510(k) – DualView Catheter
510(k) Summary
| Device Characteristics | Subject Device: DualView Catheter | Primary Predicate Device: Optis Integrated System, Dragonfly Optis Imaging Catheter (K141769) | Secondary Predicate Device: Opticross 40 MHz Coronary Imaging Catheter (K123621) |
|---|---|---|---|
| System will further acquire radio frequency signal outputs from both a distal intracoronary pressure transducer and a proximal aortic pressure transducer to determine the physiological parameter, Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR). The physician may use the FFR parameter, along with knowledge of patient history, medical expertise and clinical judgment to determine if therapeutic intervention is indicated. | |||
| Imaging Energy | Optical Coherence Tomography/Ultrasound | Optical Coherence Tomography | Ultrasound |
| Optical Wavelength | 1300 nm | 1305 nm | Not applicable |
| Ultrasound Frequency | 40 MHz | Not applicable | 40 MHz |
| Effective Length | 1370 mm | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Catheter O.D. | Imaging window: 2.6 Fr (0.86 mm) Proximal shaft: 3.0 Fr (1.01 mm) | Imaging window: 2.7 Fr Proximal shaft: 3.2 Fr | Imaging window: 2.6 Fr Proximal shaft: 3.0 Fr (1.00 mm) |
| Maximum guidewire O.D. | 0.014" (0.36mm) | 0.014" (0.356mm) | 0.014" (0.36mm) |
| Package | Individual package on which the product label and the peel-off labels are attached 1 unit per package. | Individual package on which the product label and the peel-off labels are attached 1 unit per package. | Individual package on which the product label and the peel-off labels are attached 1 unit per package. |
| Operation Principle | Manual | Manual | Manual |
Page 6 of 10
Page 11
Terumo Corporation
Traditional 510(k) – DualView Catheter
510(k) Summary
| Sterilization | Ethylene oxide | Ethylene Oxide | Irradiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shelf life | 36 Months | 24 Months | 12 Months |
Page 7 of 10
Page 12
Terumo Corporation
Traditional 510(k) – DualView Catheter
510(k) Summary
H. NON CLINICAL TESTS (807.92(b)(1))
Performance Testing
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination:
Test Item
- Radio-detectability
- Appearance of Catheter
- Corrosion Resistance
- Tensile Strength
- Freedom from leakage
- Small bore connector
- Sliding resistance (Imaging window)
- Particle count
- Slidability of Guidewire
- Bending strength
- Dimensions
- Imaging quality
- Pullback/forward durability
- Coating Integrity
- Stent crossability
- Simulated use – Human factor usability engineering
System level Design verification and validation testing were performed on the OPUSWAVE (K250684) with the DualView Catheter to demonstrate that the product specifications met the predefined requirements and it is safe and effective for its intended use. The result of this testing concludes that the DualView Catheter is safe and effective for its intended use.
Software Verification and Validation Testing
Software verification and validation testing were conducted per IEC 62304 Standard and 'Enhanced' level of documentation was provided as recommended by FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff "Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions," with OPUSWAVE (K250684)
Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) and Collateral Standards
K250751 Page 8 of 10
Page 13
Terumo Corporation
Traditional 510(k) – DualView Catheter
510(k) Summary
Electrical safety and EMC testing was conducted for the OPUSWAVE. The system is in compliance with IEC 60601-1 and collateral standards, IEC 60601-2-18, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60825, and IEC 60601-2-37.
Animal Study
A safety animal study, in swine model, evaluated the tissue injury level and thrombus formation of coronary arteries that were exposed to simultaneous near-infrared light and ultrasound energy application. It was concluded that there were no issues related to tissue damage and thrombus formation in coronary arteries caused by simultaneous application or near infrared light and ultrasound.
A performance animal study, in swine model, successfully assessed key performance and handling criteria compared to predicate devices and concluded that the system performed as intended.
Biocompatibility
In accordance with ISO 10993-1, DualView Catheter is classified as: Externally Communicating Device, Circulating Blood, Limited Contact (<24 hours). The finished device's patient contacting parts were tested in accordance with the tests recommended in the FDA Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff - Use of International Standard ISO-10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process." Screening tests were performed on accelerated aged devices to show that the biocompatibility is maintained throughout the shelf life of the product. Results of the testing demonstrate that the device is biocompatible throughout the shelf-life of the product.
Sterilization
The sterility of the device is assured using a sterilization method validated in accordance with ISO 11135:2014/Amd 1:2018, Sterilization of Health Care Products – Ethylene Oxide – Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices, to provide a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10-6.
K250751 Page 9 of 10
Page 14
Terumo Corporation
Traditional 510(k) – DualView Catheter
510(k) Summary
I. CLINICAL TESTS (807.92(b)(2))
This 510(k) does not include data from clinical tests.
J. CONCLUSION (807.92(b)(3))
In summary, DualView Catheter, subject of this 510(k), is substantially equivalent in its intended use, technology/principle of operation, materials, and performance to the predicates, Optis Integrated System, Dragonfly Optis Imaging Catheter (K141769) manufactured by LightLab Imaging Inc and Opticross 40 MHz Coronary Imaging Catheter (K123621) manufactured by Boston Scientific Corporation.
K250751 Page 10 of 10
§ 870.1200 Diagnostic intravascular catheter.
(a)
Identification. An intravascular diagnostic catheter is a device used to record intracardiac pressures, to sample blood, and to introduce substances into the heart and vessels. Included in this generic device are right-heart catheters, left-heart catheters, and angiographic catheters, among others.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).