(198 days)
The Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System is a general-purpose ultrasonic imaging instrument intended for use by appropriately trained healthcare professionals in hospital for evaluation of Fetal, Abdominal, Pediatric, Small Organ (breast, testes, thyroid), Cephalic (neonatal and adult), Transrectal, Trans-vaginal, Peripheral Vascular, Cerebral Vasculoskeletal (Conventional and Superficial), Cardiac (pediatric and adult), Trans-esoph (Cardiac), Laparoscopic, OB/Gyn and Urology.
This SonoScape P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System is an integrated preprogrammed color ultrasound imaging system, capable of producing high detail resolution intended for clinical diagnostic imaging applications.
The basic principle is that system transmits ultrasonic energy into patient body and implements post processing of received echoes to generate onscreen display of anatomic structures and fluid flow within the body.
This system is a Track 3 device that employs a wide array of probes that include linear array, convex array phased array and etc.
This system consists of a mobile console with touch screen and keyboard control panel, power supply module, color LCD monitor and optional probes.
This system is a mobile, general purpose, software controlled, color diagnostic ultrasound system. Its basic function is to acquire ultrasound data and to display the image in B-Mode (including Tissue Harmonic Image), M-Mode, TDI, Color-Flow Doppler, Pulsed Wave Doppler, Continued Wave Doppler, Power Doppler, Direct Power Doppler, or the combination of these modes, Compound, 3D/4D, Elastography and Contrast.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study details for the S-FetusAI feature of the Sonoscape Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System (P60 Series), based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Feature | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| S-Fetus-Recognition | Accuracy: Not less than 85%. | 90.01% |
| S-Fetus-Measure | Accuracy: Not less than 80%. | 85% |
Clinical Performance:
| Evaluation Metric | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Identification Precision of the 14 Standard Sections (Primary Evaluation Indicator) | Non-inferiority design: The lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference of Identification Precision must be greater than -10% (S-FetusAI compared to manual recognition). | The recognition precision of the standard sections of S-FetusAI was not inferior to that of the manual scan. |
| Measurement Error of Growth Parameters (Secondary Evaluation Indicator) | - Relative errors of measurement for 11 Growth Parameters.- Precision of Sp (spinal cord cone end positioning). | S-FetusAI has a good consistency with the manual measurement.The Sp (spinal cone end positioning) precision was basically equal between the trial group and control group. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- S-Fetus-Recognition Test Set:
- More than 200 images for each of the 14 standard sections.
- Total: 3717 images.
- S-Fetus-Measure Test Set:
- More than 250 images for each of the 9 standard sections.
- Total: 2929 images.
- Data Provenance: A mix of retrospective and prospective data collection in clinical practice. The test sets were collected at three hospitals in China.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
- Initial Ground Truth Drawing: Five OB/GYN experts with more than 3 years' experience.
- Cross-checking: Two experts with more than 20 years' experience.
- Re-checking: Four experts with more than 30 years' experience.
- Clinical Performance Study (Adjudication of results): Two Readers from an independent evaluation group, consisting of qualified professionals (senior experts who had been involved in prenatal ultrasound examination).
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
The ground truth was established through a multi-level expert consensus process:
- Initial Drawing: 5 OB/GYN experts.
- Cross-checking: 2 senior experts.
- Re-checking: 4 very senior experts.
This indicates a robust, multi-stage consensus-based adjudication, effectively a form of "expert consensus with multiple layers of review."
For the clinical performance testing, a separate "independent evaluation group" with 2 senior experts evaluated the section recognition results and precision of Sp from both the trial (AI-assisted) and contrast (manual) groups.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs Without AI Assistance
- A clinical performance testing was conducted, which involved comparing the S-FetusAI function (Trial group) with manual recognition and measurement by investigators (Contrast group). This can be considered a comparative effectiveness study.
- Research Group Composition (Contrast Group): Investigators (physicians with more than 3 years of specialized training in obstetric ultrasound examination; total 7 investigators) performing manual recognition and measurement.
- Effect Size: The study focused on demonstrating non-inferiority rather than a specific improvement percentage for human readers with AI assistance. The conclusion states that "the recognition precision of the standard sections of S-FetusAI was not inferior to that of the manual scan." This implies that the AI-assisted system performs at least as well as, or comparably to, manual recognition. It does not explicitly quantify how much human readers improve when using AI, but rather that the AI's standalone performance (for recognition) and consistency/precision (for measurement) are comparable to manual methods.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
Yes, a standalone performance testing was done for the S-FetusAI feature for both S-Fetus-Recognition and S-Fetus-Measure. The results (90.01% accuracy for recognition and 85% accuracy for measurement) are reported as entirely algorithmic performance against established ground truth.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth used was expert consensus. It was established by multiple OB/GYN experts with varying levels of experience, going through a process of initial drawing, cross-checking, and re-checking. Any images not meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria were excluded from the ground truth set.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
The document explicitly states: "The test set used to test the standalone performance of S-FetusAI are independent of the training data set and tuning data set". However, the sample size for the training set is not provided in the given text.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
While the document implies that training and tuning datasets were used, the specific method for establishing their ground truth is not mentioned in the provided text. It only details the ground truth establishment for the test set.
{0}------------------------------------------------
January 17, 2025
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logos of the Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health and Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
Sonoscape Medical Corp. Toki Wu Regulatory Affairs Director Room 201 & 202,12th Building,Shenzhen Software Park Phase II 1 Keji Middle 2nd Road, Yuehai Subdistrict, Nanshan District Shenzhen, Guangdong 518057 CHINA
Re: K241949
Trade/Device Name: Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System (P60 Series) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1550 Regulation Name: Ultrasonic Pulsed Doppler Imaging System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: IYN, IYO, ITX Dated: December 16, 2024 Received: December 16, 2024
Dear Toki Wu:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory
{2}------------------------------------------------
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
YANNA S. KANG -S
Yanna Kang, Ph.D. Assistant Director Mammography and Ultrasound Team DHT8C: Division of Radiological Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices OHT8: Office of Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
Device Name
Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System (P60 Series)
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System is a general-purpose ultrasonic imaging instrument intended for use by appropriately trained healthcare professionals in hospital for evaluation of Fetal, Abdominal, Pediatric, Small Organ (breast, testes, thyroid), Cephalic (neonatal and adult), Transrectal, Trans-vaginal, Peripheral Vascular, Cerebral Vasculoskeletal (Conventional and Superficial), Cardiac (pediatric and adult), Trans-esoph (Cardiac), Laparoscopic, OB/Gyn and Urology.
Modes of operation include: B, M. PW Doppler. CW Doppler, Color Doppler, Color M Doppler, Power Doppler, Directional Power Doppler, Tissue Harmonic Imaging, Tissue Doppler Imaging, 3D/4D Imaging mode, Strain Elastography, Contrast imaging and Combined modes: B/M, B/PWD, B/THI, M/Color M, B/Color Doppler, B/Color Doppler/PWD, B/Power Doppler/PWD.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
This 510(k) Summary is being submitted in accordance with requirements of Title 21, CFR Section 807.92.
The assigned 510(k) Number: K241949
-
- Date of Preparation: 11/25/2024
-
- Sponsor Identification
SONOSCAPE MEDICAL CORP.
Room 201 & 202, 12th Building, Shenzhen Software Park Phase II, 1 Keji Middle 2nd Road, Yuehai Subdistrict, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, 518057, Guangdong, China.
Establishment Registration Number: 3004705634
Contact Person: Toki Wu Position: Regulatory Affairs Director Tel: +86-755-26722890 Fax: +86-755-26722850 Email: ra@sonoscape.net
3. Identification of Subject Device
Trade Name: P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System Models: P60 Exp, P60 Pro, P60, P60 CV, P70T, P70S, P60S, P60 VO, P55, P55 Elite, P55S, P50T, P50 Elite, P50E, P40T, P40 Elite, P40E, P30T, P30 Elite, P30E, P25S, P22S, SonoStage M1 Common Name: Diagnostic Ultrasound System and Transducers
Regulatory Information
| CFR Number | Product Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasonic Pulsed Doppler Imaging System (Primary) | 892.1550 | 90-IYN |
| Ultrasonic Pulsed Echo Imaging System | 892.1560 | 90-IYO |
| Diagnostic Ultrasound Transducer | 892.1570 | 90-ITX |
Classification Panel: Radiology
Device Classification: II
{5}------------------------------------------------
Indication for Use:
The P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System is a general-purpose ultrasonic imaging instrument intended for use by appropriately trained healthcare professionals in hospital for evaluation of Fetal, Abdominal, Pediatric, Small Organ (breast, thyroid), Cephalic (neonatal and adult), Trans-rectal, Trans-vaginal, Peripheral Vascular, Cerebral Vasculoskeletal (Conventional and Superficial), Cardiac (pediatric and adult), Trans-esoph (Cardiac), Laparoscopic, OB/Gyn and Urology. Modes of operation include: B, M, PW Doppler, CW Doppler, Color Doppler, Color M Doppler, Power Doppler, Directional Power Doppler, Tissue Harmonic Imaging, Tissue Doppler Imaging, 3D/4D Imaging mode, Strain Elastography, Contrast imaging and Combined modes: B/M, B/PWD, B/THI, M/Color M, B/Color Doppler, B/Color Doppler/PWD, B/Power Doppler/PWD.
Device Description:
This SonoScape P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System is an integrated preprogrammed color ultrasound imaging system, capable of producing high detail resolution intended for clinical diagnostic imaging applications.
The basic principle is that system transmits ultrasonic energy into patient body and implements post processing of received echoes to generate onscreen display of anatomic structures and fluid flow within the body.
This system is a Track 3 device that employs a wide array of probes that include linear array, convex array phased array and etc.
This system consists of a mobile console with touch screen and keyboard control panel, power supply module, color LCD monitor and optional probes.
This system is a mobile, general purpose, software controlled, color diagnostic ultrasound system. Its basic function is to acquire ultrasound data and to display the image in B-Mode (including Tissue Harmonic Image), M-Mode, TDI, Color-Flow Doppler, Pulsed Wave Doppler, Continued Wave Doppler, Power Doppler, Direction Power Doppler, or the combination of these modes, Compound, 3D/4D, Elastography and Contrast.
4. Identification of Predicate Device
| Type | Device | 510 (k) Number | Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1) Primary PredicateDevice | P60 Series Digital ColorDoppler Ultrasound System | K171000 | SonoScape Medical Corp |
| 2) Reference Device | S90 Exp Series Digital ColorDoppler Ultrasound System | K222596 | SonoScape Medical Corp |
| 3) Reference Device | P20 Elite Series Digital ColorDoppler Ultrasound System | K221140 | SonoScape Medical Corp |
- Non-Clinical Test Conclusion
{6}------------------------------------------------
Non clinical tests were conducted to evaluate for acoustic output, biocompatibility as well as electrical, mechanical, thermal and electromagnetic compatibility safety, and has been found to comply with the applicable medical device safety standards. The P60 Series has been designed and manufactured to meet the following standards.
AAMI/ANSI ES 60601-1, Medical Electrical Equipment- Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance [Edition 3.2, 2021];
IEC 60601-1-2, Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2 General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral standard: Electromagnetic disturbances - Requirements and tests [Edition 4.1, 2020];
IEC 60601-2-37, Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 2-37: Particular requirements for basic safety and essential performance of ultrasonic medical diagnostic and monitoring equipment [Edition 2.1, 2015];
ISO 10993-1, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices, Part 1: evaluation and testing within a risk management process [2018];
AIUM/NEMA UD 2, Acoustic output measurement standard for diagnostic ultrasound equipment [Revision 3, 2009].
The Summary of performance test for the new feature (S-FetusAl)
| The data set were acquired with P60/S60 series Digital Color Doppler | |
|---|---|
| Equipment used tocollect images | Ultrasound System and probes in order to secure diversity of the data set:Mix of data from retrospective data collection and prospective data collectionin clinical practice. |
| Reference standard | The ground truths drawn by five OB/GYN experts with more than 3 years'experience were cross-checked by the two experts with more than 20 years'experience and were re-checked by other four experts with more than 30years' experience.Any images that do not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria were excludedfrom the set of images. |
| Test Set | The test set used to test the standalone performance of S-FetusAI areindependent of the training data set and tuning data set, which have beencollected at three hospitals in China and meet the characteristics ofindependence, representativeness, uniformity of distribution, etc., and striveto include all possible scenarios in the clinic as far as possible.S-Fetus-Recognition:The number of test set is more than 200 images for each standard section;total 3717 images for 14 standard sections.S-Fetus-Measure: |
-
- Standalone Performance testing
{7}------------------------------------------------
| The number of test set is more than 250 for each standard section; total 2929 image for 9 standard sections. | |
|---|---|
| Acceptance Criteria | The accuracy of the S-Fetus-Recognition is not less than 85%.The accuracy of the S-fetus-Measure is not less than 80%. |
| Test Results | The accuracy of the S-Fetus-Recognition is 90.01%.The accuracy of the S-fetus-Measure is 85%. |
2) Clinical Performance testing
| Research Device | P60 Exp Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System with S-FetusAI& VC6-2 Probe |
|---|---|
| Research Group | Trial group: Automatic recognition and measurement of the S-FetusAI function of the Research Device;Contrast group: Manual recognition and measurement of the investigators (physicians with more than 3 years of specialized training in obstetric ultrasound examination; total 7 investigators).The section recognition results and precision of Sp of Trial group and Contrast group were evaluated by the 2 Readers from the independent evaluation group, which consists of three qualified professionals (senior experts who had been involved in prenatal ultrasound examination). |
| Sample Size | 158 cases |
| ClinicalPerformanceEvaluation &Acceptance Criteria | 1.Identification Precision of the 14 Standard Sections (Primary Evaluation Indicator)Non-inferiority design is used.If the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference of Identification Precision is greater than -10%, then the Identification Precision of the Standard Section of S-FetusAI function is considered non-inferior to manual recognition.2. Measurement Error of Growth Parameters (Secondary Evaluation Indicator)1) The relative errors of measurement for the 11 Growth Parameters;2) The precision of Sp (spinal cord cone end positioning). |
| Conclusion | According to the clinical trial results, we can deduce that the recognition precision of the standard sections of S-FetusAI was not inferior to that of the manual scan, S-FetusAI has a good consistency with the manual measurement and the Sp (spinal cone end positioning) precision was basically equal between the trial group and control group. |
6. Clinical Test Conclusion
The Subject device P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System did not require clinical studies
{8}------------------------------------------------
to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
-
- Comparison with Predicate Devices
The Subject device P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System is comparable with and substantially equivalent to the predicate devices with regards to intended uses, imaging modes, acoustic output levels, probes and biopsy brackets supported, technical characteristics and features.
- Comparison with Predicate Devices
-
The P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System has the same intended use and imaging modes as the predicate device P60 Series (K171000);
-
The P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System is designed in compliance with the FDA recognized electrical and physical safety standards, which are the same as the predicate device P60 Series (K171000);
-
The acoustic output levels of the P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System are below the limits of FDA, which are the same as the predicate device P60 Series (K171000);
-
The P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System have supported six new probes, including L752, L2-9, L3-11, MC1-6, 3P-A and 2P1, which have been migrated from the predicate device S90 Exp Series (K222596) and P20 Elite Series (K221140);
-
The P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System have supported five new biopsy brackets, including NGBL752, NGBL2-9, NGBMC1-6, NGB2P1 and NGB3P-A, which have been cleared with many ultrasound systems manufactured by SonoScape, including the predicate device P20 Elite Series (K221140) and S90 Exp Series (K222596).
-
The P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System have the following new features (functions), including SR Flow, Micro F, S-Follicle, S-Endo, S-MSK,VCI, FreeVue, S-Live Contour, Color 3D, STIC, S-Spine, S-Pelvic Floor, 3D/4D HyCoSy, SPI, Sono-Synch, Sono-Drop and Sono Assistant, which have been migrated from the predicate device S90 Exp Series (K222596) and P20 Elite Series (K221140).
-
The P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System add one new feature: S-FetusAJ, which is carried out using the Artificial Intelligence or Machine Learning algorithm. The recognition precision of the standard sections of S-FetusAl is equivalent to that of the manual scan and the measurement precision of S-FetusA is equivalent to the manual measurement and the Sp (spinal cone end positioning) precision is equivalent to that of the manual position.
-
The P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System have the following new features (auto measurements), including Auto Bladder, Auto IMT, Auto EF, Auto NT, Auto OB, S-Endo. and S-Follicle, which have been migrated from the predicate device S90 Exp Series (K222596) and P20 Elite Series (K221140);
-
The P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System add three new features (auto measurements), including S-Breast, S-Thyroid and S-hip, which are equivalent to the corresponding manual measurements cleared in the predicate device S90 Exp Series (K222596) and P20 Elite Series (K221140) and not based on AI/ML or deep learning-based technologies.
{9}------------------------------------------------
8. Conclusion
In accordance with 21 CFR Part 807 and based on the information provided, the subject device, P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System, and the predicate device have the same intended use. While there are differences in technological characteristics, these differences were evaluated with performance testing as described and the technological differences do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness. Therefore, the results of the testing demonstrate that the subject device, P60 Series Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System, is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
§ 892.1550 Ultrasonic pulsed doppler imaging system.
(a)
Identification. An ultrasonic pulsed doppler imaging system is a device that combines the features of continuous wave doppler-effect technology with pulsed-echo effect technology and is intended to determine stationary body tissue characteristics, such as depth or location of tissue interfaces or dynamic tissue characteristics such as velocity of blood or tissue motion. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II.