(161 days)
The APRO 55 Catheter with an aspiration pump and the Alembic Aspiration Tubing is intended for use in the revascularization of patients with acute stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral - M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset. Patients who are ineligible for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) or who fail IV t-PA therapy are candidates for treatment.
The Alembic Aspiration Tubing is intended to connect the APRO 55 Catheter to the aspiration pump.
The APRO 55 Catheter is a single-lumen, braid and coil reinforced catheter. The APRO 55 Catheter is designed to remove thrombus from the vasculature using aspiration. The APRO 55 Catheter targets aspiration from a suction pump directly to the thrombus to remove thrombus from an occluded vessel. The APRO 55 Catheter is introduced through a guide catheter or long femoral sheath and into the intracranial vasculature and guided over a neurovascular guidewire under fluoroscopic visualization to the site of the primary occlusion. The distal shaft has a hydrophilic coating to aid navigation through the vasculature. A radiopaque marker is located at the distal end of the catheter for visualization under fluoroscopy. For the aspiration source, the APRO 55 Catheter is used in conjunction with an aspiration pump with pre-specified performance parameters that is connected using the Alembic Aspiration Tubing, along with a legally marketed canister and accessories kit. The APRO 55 Catheter is available in lengths of 125 cm and 137 cm and is provided with an introducer sheath.
The Alembic Aspiration Tubing connects the APRO 55 Catheter to the aspiration pump. The flow control valve allows control of the aspiration flow using an ON/OFF switch. It is available in one size.
Here's a summary based on the provided FDA 510(k) document, focusing on acceptance criteria and study details:
Device: APRO 55 Catheter and Alembic Aspiration Tubing
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria listed are primarily for non-clinical bench tests. The reported device performance uniformly states that the APRO 55 Catheter (and Alembic Aspiration Tubing where applicable) met the acceptance criteria.
| Test | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Visual and Dimensional Characteristics | Catheter meets the visual and dimensional specifications. Introducer Sheath meets the visual and dimensional specifications. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. The Introducer Sheath met the acceptance criteria. |
| Particulate | Catheter meets the acceptance criteria. Subject device was evaluated with a predicate device under the same test conditions. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. |
| Vacuum Integrity | Catheter is free from collapse and loss of vacuum between aspiration source and catheter tip. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. |
| Kink Resistance | Catheter shaft shall not kink at clinically relevant radii. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. |
| Catheter Hub Leakage | Catheter does not leak into hub assembly during aspiration, with methods specified in ISO 10555-1, Annex D. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. |
| Hub Compatibility | Hub meets the requirements per EN ISO 80369-7. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. |
| Catheter Torque Strength | Catheter must withstand the minimum required number of rotations without breakage and without kinking compared to legally marketed devices. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. |
| Dynamic Burst Pressure | No damage to catheter with dynamic pressure. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. |
| Fluid Leakage | Catheter must withstand pressure with methods per ISO 10555-1 Annex C. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. |
| Static Burst | Catheter must withstand pressures anticipated for clinical use. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. |
| Tensile Strength of Catheter Hub and Shaft | Catheter hub and shaft must meet tensile strength specification. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. |
| Tensile Strength of Catheter Tip | Catheter tip must meet tip tensile strength specification. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. |
| Delivery and Retrieval Force | Catheter delivery and retrieval force must be acceptable. Forces were compared to a predicate. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. |
| Tip Buckling Force | Catheter tip buckling force must be acceptable. Forces were compared to a predicate. | The APRO 55 Catheter met the acceptance criteria. |
| Simulated Use including Clot Retrieval | When used per the Instructions for Use with accessory devices in an anatomical neurovascular model, the Catheter and Aspiration Tubing must meet functionality specifications. Clot retrieval from various locations of the anatomical model was performed using the subject device system. | The APRO 55 Catheter and Alembic Aspiration Tubing met the acceptance criteria. |
Biocompatibility Tests:
| Test | Results | Conclusions |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitization (Guinea Pig Maximization) | The APRO 55 Catheter did not elicit a sensitization response. | Non-sensitizing |
| Irritation/Intracutaneous Reactivity | The APRO 55 Catheter demonstrated no evidence of irritation. | Non-Irritant |
| Cytotoxicity (MEM Elution, L929 cells) | The APRO 55 Catheter did not elicit a cytotoxic response at 24 hours and 48 hours. | Non-cytotoxic |
| Hemolysis – Indirect | There were no significant differences between the test article extract and negative control article results. | Non-hemolytic |
| Hemolysis – Direct | There were no differences between the hemolytic index of the test article and the negative control. | Non-hemolytic |
| Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) | The average clotting time of the test article was greater than vehicle control and negative control. | Acceptable clotting times |
| SC5b9 Complement Activation | The Sc5b9 concentration of the test article was statistically less than the positive control and was not statistically higher than the negative control. | Acceptable |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity | No weight loss, mortality, or evidence of systemic toxicity from the extract exposure to the mice. | Non-toxic |
| Material-Mediated Pyrogenicity | All individual rabbits for both the test article and negative control showed a total rise in temperature of < 0.5 °C and were determined to be nonpyrogenic. | Non-pyrogenic |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document does not explicitly state a sample size for the "test set" in terms of patient data. All testing described is non-clinical bench testing and biocompatibility testing.
- Data Provenance: Not applicable as no human patient data was used for effectiveness evaluation. The studies were laboratory-based bench tests and animal biocompatibility studies.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
- This information is not provided as the studies were non-clinical bench tests and biocompatibility testing, which do not typically involve human expert ground truth for performance evaluation in the way imaging AI or diagnostic devices do. Standardized test methods and acceptance criteria are used.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- This information is not provided and is not applicable, as there was no test set requiring human adjudication for performance evaluation.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
- No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. The document explicitly states: "Substantial equivalence was established based on non-clinical performance data. Human clinical data were not deemed necessary."
6. Standalone (Algorithm only without human-in-the-loop) Performance
- This is not applicable. The APRO 55 Catheter and Alembic Aspiration Tubing is a physical medical device (catheter for thrombus retrieval) and not an AI algorithm or software-only device. Therefore, standalone algorithm performance is not a relevant concept for this submission.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
- For non-clinical bench testing, the "ground truth" is defined by the specifications, industry standards (e.g., ISO 10555-1, EN ISO 80369-7), and acceptable ranges or comparisons to predicate devices outlined in the acceptance criteria. For example, for "Kink Resistance," the ground truth is "Catheter shaft shall not kink at clinically relevant radii."
- For biocompatibility testing, the ground truth is established by standardized biological response criteria (e.g., non-sensitizing, non-irritant, non-cytotoxic) defined by ISO 10993-1.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
- This information is not applicable as this is a physical medical device and not an AI/ML device that requires a training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- This information is not applicable as this is a physical medical device and not an AI/ML device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
August 29, 2024
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA text logo on the right. The FDA text logo is in blue and includes the words "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in a larger font size and "ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font size below.
Alembic, LLC Lisa Yen Director of Regulatory and Quality 627 National Avenue Mountain View, California 94043
Re: K232971
Trade/Device Name: APRO 55 Catheter and Alembic Aspiration Tubing Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NRY
Dear Lisa Yen:
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is sending this letter to notify you of an administrative change related to your previous substantial equivalence (SE) determination letter dated February 29, 2024. Specifically, FDA is updating this SE Letter as an administrative correction to update the 510(k) Summary to reflect the biocompatibility testing conducted in support of the APRO 55 Catheter.
Please note that the 510(k) submission was not re-reviewed. For questions regarding this letter please contact Naira Muradyan, Ph.D., OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices, 240-402-4918, Naira.Muradyan@fda.hhs.gov.
Sincerely,
Naira Muradyan -S
Naira Muradyan, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional, and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{1}------------------------------------------------
February 29, 2024
Image /page/1/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA acronym and name on the right. The Department of Health & Human Services logo is a stylized depiction of a human figure. The FDA acronym is in a blue square, and the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" are in blue text.
Alembic, LLC Lisa Yen Director of Regulatory and Quality 627 National Avenue Mountain View. California 94043
Re: K232971
Trade/Device Name: APRO 55 Catheter and Alembic Aspiration Tubing Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NRY Dated: January 26, 2024 Received: January 29, 2024
Dear Lisa Yen:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrb/cfdocs/cfpm/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{2}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Naira Muradyan -S
Naira Muradyan, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{3}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K232971
Device Name
APRO 55 Catheter and Alembic Aspiration Tubing
Indications for Use (Describe)
The APRO 55 Catheter with an aspiration pump and the Alembic Aspiration Tubing is intended for use in the revascularization of patients with acute stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral - M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset. Patients who are ineligible for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) or who fail IV t-PA therapy are candidates for treatment.
The Alembic Aspiration Tubing is intended to connect the APRO 55 Catheter to the aspiration pump.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
510(k) Number: K232971
This 510(k) Summary is provided in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR §807.92.
1) Submitter information
| Submitter: | Alembic, LLC627 National Ave.Mountain View, CA 94043 |
|---|---|
| Contact: | Lisa YenDirector of Regulatory and QualityTelephone Number: (650) 388-5087Fax: (650) 390-0107Email: lyen@alembicllc.com |
| Date Prepared: | Mar 05, 2024 |
2) Device Name and Classification
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | APRO® 55 Catheter and Alembic Aspiration Tubing |
|---|---|
| Common Name: | Catheter, Thrombus Retriever |
| Classification Name: | Percutaneous Catheter, 21 CFR 870.1250 |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | NRY |
| Review Panel: | Neurology |
3) Legally Marketed Predicate Device and Reference Device
| Predicate Device: | K173841 AXS Catalyst Distal Access Catheter as part of the AXSUniversal Aspiration System |
|---|---|
| Reference Device: | K223545 APRO® 70 Catheter and Alembic Aspiration Tubing |
4) Device Description
The APRO 55 Catheter is a single-lumen, braid and coil reinforced catheter. The APRO 55 Catheter is designed to remove thrombus from the vasculature using aspiration. The APRO 55 Catheter targets aspiration from a suction pump directly to the thrombus to remove thrombus from an occluded vessel. The APRO 55 Catheter is introduced through a guide catheter or long femoral sheath and into the intracranial vasculature and guided over a neurovascular guidewire under fluoroscopic visualization to the site of the primary occlusion. The distal shaft has a hydrophilic coating to aid navigation through the vasculature. A radiopaque marker is located at the distal end of the catheter for visualization under fluoroscopy. For the
{5}------------------------------------------------
aspiration source, the APRO 55 Catheter is used in conjunction with an aspiration pump with pre-specified performance parameters that is connected using the Alembic Aspiration Tubing, along with a legally marketed canister and accessories kit. The APRO 55 Catheter is available in lengths of 125 cm and 137 cm and is provided with an introducer sheath.
The Alembic Aspiration Tubing connects the APRO 55 Catheter to the aspiration pump. The flow control valve allows control of the aspiration flow using an ON/OFF switch. It is available in one size.
5) Indications for Use
The APRO 55 Catheter with an aspiration pump and the Alembic Aspiration Tubing is intended for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial large vessel occlusive disease (within the internal carotid, middle cerebral - M1 and M2 segments, basilar, and vertebral arteries) within 8 hours of symptom onset. Patients who are ineligible for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) or who fail IV t-PA therapy are candidates for treatment.
The Alembic Aspiration Tubing is intended to connect the APRO 55 Catheter to the aspiration pump.
6) Technological Characteristics Comparison
Alembic has demonstrated the APRO 55 Catheter and Alembic Aspiration Tubing are substantially equivalent to the predicate AXS Catalyst Distal Access Catheter based on the similarity in materials, similarity in design concept, and the same fundamental operating principles. A comparison of the APRO 55 Catheter with the predicate device is summarized in Table 1 below. There are no changes to the Alembic Aspiration Tubing compared to that included as part of the K223545 submission.
| Table 1 - APRO 55 Catheter Comparison with the Predicate Device and Reference Device | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Subject DeviceAPRO 55 Catheter andAlembic Aspiration Tubing | Predicate DeviceAXS Catalyst DistalAccess Catheter as part ofthe AXS UniversalAspiration System | Reference DeviceAPRO 70 Catheter andAlembic Aspiration Tubing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 510(k) Number | K232971 | K173841 | K223545 |
| Regulatory Class | Identical to predicate | Class II, 21 CFR 870.1250,NRY | Class II, 21 CFR 870.1250,NRY |
| Indications for Use | The APRO 55 Catheter withan aspiration pump and theAlembic Aspiration Tubing isintended for use in therevascularization of patientswith acute ischemic strokesecondary to intracranial largevessel occlusive disease(within the internal carotid,middle cerebral - M1 and M2segments, basilar, andvertebral arteries) within 8 | The AXS Catalyst DistalAccess Catheter as part ofthe AXS UniversalAspiration System isindicated for use in therevascularization of patientswith acute ischemic strokesecondary to intracraniallarge vessel occlusivedisease (in theinternal carotid, middlecerebral - M1 and M2 | The APRO 70 Catheter withan aspiration pump and theAlembic Aspiration Tubing isintended for use in therevascularization of patientswith acute ischemic strokesecondary to intracraniallarge vessel occlusive disease(within the internal carotid,middle cerebral - M1 and M2segments, basilar, andvertebral arteries) within 8 |
| Category | Subject DeviceAPRO 55 Catheter andAlembic Aspiration Tubing | Predicate DeviceAXS Catalyst DistalAccess Catheter as part ofthe AXS UniversalAspiration System | Reference DeviceAPRO 70 Catheter andAlembic Aspiration Tubing |
| hours of symptom onset.Patients who are ineligible forintravenous tissueplasminogen activator (IV t-PA) or who fail IV t-PAtherapy are candidates fortreatment.The Alembic AspirationTubing is intended to connectthe APRO 55 Catheter to theaspiration pump. | hours of symptom onset.segments, basilar, andvertebral arteries) within 8hours of symptom onset.Patients who are ineligiblefor intravenous tissueplasminogen activator (IVt-PA) or who failed IV t-PAare candidatesfor treatment. | hours of symptom onset.Patients who are ineligible forintravenous tissueplasminogen activator (IV t-PA) or who fail IV t-PAtherapy are candidates fortreatment.The Alembic AspirationTubing is intended to connectthe APRO 70 Catheter to theaspiration pump. | |
| Principles ofOperation | Same as predicate, reference | Using conventionalcatheterization techniquesunder fluoroscopic guidance,the catheter is advanced intothe target vessel over anappropriate neurovascularguidewire. The catheter ispositioned proximal to thethrombus to aspirate. | Using conventionalcatheterization techniquesunder fluoroscopic guidance,the catheter is advanced intothe target vessel over anappropriate neurovascularguidewire. The catheter ispositioned proximal to thethrombus to aspirate. |
| Materials | |||
| Hub | Same as predicate | Nylon | Polycarbonate |
| Adhesive | Same as reference | None | Cyanoacrylate |
| Strain Relief | Same as reference | Thermoplastic rubber | Santoprene (thermoplasticelastomer) |
| Liner | Same as reference | Polytetrafluoroethylene(PTFE) | PTFE/Tecoflex composite |
| Shaft Coil orBraid | Same as reference | Stainless steel with nitinolwire and polymer fiber | 304V stainless steel braid304V stainless steel coil |
| Extrusions | Same as reference | Pebax, Nylon | Thermoplastic polyurethanes,thermoplastic elastomer |
| Marker Band | Same as predicate, reference | Platinum/ iridium | Platinum/ iridium |
| Coating | Same as predicate, reference | Hydrophilic coating | Hydrophilic coating |
| Dimensions | |||
| Proximal OuterDiameter | 0.066 inch | 5.6 F (0.073 inch)6.0 F (0.078 inch) | 0.083 inch |
| Distal OuterDiameter | 0.066 inch | 5.3 F (0.069 inch)5.4 F (0.070 inch) | 0.083 inch |
| Inner Diameter (ID) | 0.055 inch | 0.058 inch, 0.060 inch | 0.070 inch |
| Effective Length | 125, 137 cm | 115, 132 cm | 125, 132, 135 cm |
| Coated Length | 90, 102 cm | 65, 82 cm | 90, 97, 100 cm |
| Tip Shape | Same as predicate, reference | Straight | Straight |
| Accessories | |||
| Introducer Sheath | Same as predicate, reference | Yes | Yes |
| RotatingHemostasis Valve | Same as reference | Yes | None |
| Category | Subject DeviceAPRO 55 Catheter andAlembic Aspiration Tubing | Predicate DeviceAXS Catalyst DistalAccess Catheter as part ofthe AXS UniversalAspiration System | Reference DeviceAPRO 70 Catheter andAlembic Aspiration Tubing |
| Packaging Materials | |||
| Pouch | Same as predicate, reference | Nylon/polyethylene/Tyvek | Nylon/polyethylene/Tyvek |
| Packaging Tube | Same as predicate, reference | Polyethylene | Polyethylene |
| Packaging Card | Same as predicate, reference | Yes | Polyethylene |
| Shelf Carton | Same as predicate, reference | Solid bleached sulfatepaperboard | Solid bleached sulfatepaperboard |
| Other | |||
| Sterilization | Same as predicate, reference | Ethylene oxide | Ethylene oxide |
| Shelf Life | Same as reference | 2 years | 6 months |
| Use | Same as predicate, reference | Sterile, single use,disposable | Sterile, single use, disposable |
| Alembic Aspiration Tubing | |||
| Aspiration Tubing | Same as reference | 300 cm lengthTubing ID = 0.218 inch | 110 inch lengthTubing ID = 0.110 inch |
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
7) Performance Data
Alembic performed non-clinical bench testing in accordance with the same design controls, protocols, and test methods as for the reference device APRO 70 Catheter (K223545). The results demonstrate substantial equivalence of the subject APRO 55 Catheter and Alembic Aspiration Tubing to the legally marketed predicate device.
A. Design Verification Testing – Non-Clinical Bench
Included in Table 2 is the description of bench performance tests that were conducted to support substantial equivalence determination.
| Test | Acceptance Criteria | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Visual and DimensionalCharacteristics | Catheter meets the visual and dimensionalspecifications.Introducer Sheath meets the visual anddimensional specifications. | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria.The Introducer Sheath met theacceptance criteria. |
| Particulate | Catheter meets the acceptance criteria.Subject device was evaluated with apredicate device under the same testconditions. | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria. |
| Vacuum Integrity | Catheter is free from collapse and loss ofvacuum between aspiration source andcatheter tip. | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria. |
| Kink Resistance | Catheter shaft shall not kink at clinicallyrelevant radii. | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria. |
| Catheter Hub Leakage | Catheter does not leak into hub assemblyduring aspiration, with methods specifiedin ISO 10555-1, Annex D. | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria. |
| Hub Compatibility | Hub meets the requirements per EN ISO80369-7 | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria. |
Table 2 – Summary of Non-Clinical Bench Test Results
{8}------------------------------------------------
| Test | Acceptance Criteria | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Catheter Torque Strength | Catheter must withstand the minimumrequired number of rotations withoutbreakage and without kinking compared tolegally marketed devices. | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria. |
| Dynamic Burst Pressure | No damage to catheter with dynamicpressure. | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria. |
| Fluid Leakage | Catheter must withstand pressure withmethods per ISO 10555-1 Annex C. | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria. |
| Static Burst | Catheter must withstand pressuresanticipated for clinical use. | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria. |
| Tensile Strength ofCatheter Hub and Shaft | Catheter hub and shaft must meet tensilestrength specification. | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria. |
| Tensile Strength ofCatheter Tip | Catheter tip must meet tip tensile strengthspecification. | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria. |
| Delivery and RetrievalForce | Catheter delivery and retrieval force mustbe acceptable. Forces were compared to apredicate. | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria. |
| Tip Buckling Force | Catheter tip buckling force must beacceptable. Forces were compared to apredicate. | The APRO 55 Catheter met theacceptance criteria. |
| Simulated Use includingClot Retrieval | When used per the Instructions for Usewith accessory devices in an anatomicalneurovascular model, the Catheter andAspiration Tubing must meetfunctionality specifications. Clot retrievalfrom various locations of the anatomicalmodel was performed using the subjectdevice system. | The APRO 55 Catheter andAlembic Aspiration Tubing metthe acceptance criteria. |
B. Design Verification Testing - Animal
Substantial equivalence was established based on non-clinical performance data. Animal data were not deemed necessary.
C. Sterilization and Shelf-Life
The APRO 55 Catheter and Alembic Aspiration Tubing are sterilized using an ethylene oxide sterilization cycle that was verified to a sterility assurance level of 1 x 10° in accordance with ISO 11135. Aging studies for the APRO 55 Catheter and Alembic Aspiration Tubing have established that the subject device and packaging remain functional for the labeled expiration date. Aging studies for packaging integrity, seal strength, and device functionality were performed and met the acceptance criteria.
D. Biocompatibilitv
Biocompatibility testing has been completed for the APRO 55 Catheter in accordance with ISO 10993-1 and the device is deemed non-toxic (local or systemic), nonsensitizing, not locally irritating or otherwise harmful. Test results obtained were acceptable for the intended use as shown in Table 3. The thrombogenicity evaluation of the APRO 55 Catheter was supplemented by the prior in vivo thrombogenicity evaluation of the reference device, APRO 70 Catheter, in a good laboratory practice animal study.
{9}------------------------------------------------
Biocompatibility studies for the Alembic Aspiration Tubing, that is unchanged from K223545, have previously established that it is biocompatible.
| Test | Results | Conclusions |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitization(Guinea PigMaximization) | The APRO 55 Catheter did not elicit asensitization response. | Non-sensitizing |
| Irritation/IntracutaneousReactivity | The APRO 55 Catheter demonstrated no evidenceof irritation. | Non-Irritant |
| Cytotoxicity (MEMElution, L929 cells) | The APRO 55 Catheter did not elicit a cytotoxicresponse at 24 hours and 48 hours. | Non-cytotoxic |
| Hemolysis – Indirect | There were no significant differences between thetest article extract and negative control articleresults. | Non-hemolytic |
| Hemolysis – Direct | There were no differences between the hemolyticindex of the test article and the negative control. | Non-hemolytic |
| Partial ThromboplastinTime (PTT) | The average clotting time of the test article wasgreater than vehicle control and negative control. | Acceptable clottingtimes |
| SC5b9 ComplementActivation | The Sc5b9 concentration of the test article wasstatistically less than the positive control andwas not statistically higher than the negativecontrol. | Acceptable |
| Acute SystemicToxicity | No weight loss, mortality, or evidence ofsystemic toxicity from the extract exposure tothe mice. | Non-toxic |
| Material-MediatedPyrogenicity | All individual rabbits for both the test article andnegative control showed a total rise intemperature of < 0.5 °C and were determined tobe nonpyrogenic. | Non-pyrogenic |
Table 3 – Biocompatibility Test Results
E. Clinical Testing
Substantial equivalence was established based on non-clinical performance data. Human clinical data were not deemed necessary.
8) Conclusion
Based on the comparison of the technological characteristics and the non-clinical testing, the subject device is found to be substantially equivalent to the predicate device. The differences in technological characteristics do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness. Testing was conducted to demonstrate that the subject device meets the specifications and performs as intended.
§ 870.1250 Percutaneous catheter.
(a)
Identification. A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).