(65 days)
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Marijuana in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Marijuana (THC) | 50 ng/mL |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup offers any combinations from 2 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. It is intended for OTC use.
The tests may vield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine. Oxazepam, Secobarbital. Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 ng/mL |
| Cannabinoids (THC) | 50 ng/mL |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx offers any combinations from 2 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. It is intended for prescription use.
The tests may vield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine. Oxazepam, Secobarbital. Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
The Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup and Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx are rapid, singleuse in vitro diagnostic devices. Each test kit contains a test device in one pouch. One pouch contains a test Wisdiag Cup and two desiccants, and a package insert. The Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup is intended for over-the-counter use and the Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx is intended for prescription use.
The document describes the performance characteristics of the Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup and Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx. The device is a rapid, single-use in-vitro diagnostic test for qualitative drug detection in human urine.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study details:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document doesn't explicitly state "acceptance criteria" through a numerical threshold for accuracy metrics (e.g., "sensitivity must be >95%"). However, the precision studies and comparative studies demonstrate the device's performance against defined cut-off values. The "acceptance" can be inferred from the consistently high percentages of correct results at various concentrations relative to the cutoff, and the successful classification of samples below and above the cutoff.
Here's a table summarizing the performance based on the precision study and lay-user study for each drug at its respective cutoff concentrations. The "Reported Device Performance" here refers to the percentage of correct results for samples at the cutoff or near the cutoff values, as these are the most critical for determining accuracy. For "acceptance criteria," the expectation is generally high accuracy around the cutoff.
Table 1: Acceptance Criteria (Inferred) and Reported Device Performance
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off Level | Inferred Acceptance Criteria (Precision Study) | Reported Device Performance (Precision Study - Cutoff) | Reported Device Performance (Lay-User Study - Cutoff / closest concentrations) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP 500 | 500 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive (≥95% correct classification at these points, and good differentiation at cutoff). | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 23-27 Negative / 23-27 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 23-/27+) | Configuration 1 (AMP 500): 95% correct for -25% cutoff (19/20 negative, 1/20 positive). 100% correct for +25% cutoff (0/20 negative, 20/20 positive). (Percentages represent classification according to expected outcome relative to actual value, not test result matches LC/MS). |
| BUP 10 | 10 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 23-27 Negative / 23-27 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 23-/27+) | Configuration 1: 95% correct for -25% cutoff (19/20 negative, 1/20 positive). 90% correct for +25% cutoff (2/20 negative, 18/20 positive). |
| BAR 300 | 300 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 22-28 Negative / 22-28 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 23-/27+) | Configuration 1: 100% correct for -25% cutoff (20/20 negative). 95% correct for +25% cutoff (1/20 negative, 19/20 positive). |
| BZO 300 | 300 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 24-27 Negative / 23-26 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 24-/26+) | Configuration 1: 100% correct for -25% cutoff (20/20 negative). 95% correct for +25% cutoff (1/20 negative, 19/20 positive). |
| COC 150 | 150 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 23-28 Negative / 22-27 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 28-/22+) | Configuration 1: 90% correct for -25% cutoff (18/20 negative, 2/20 positive). 95% correct for +25% cutoff (1/20 negative, 19/20 positive). |
| EDDP 300 | 300 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 25-28 Negative / 22-25 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 25-/25+) | Configuration 1: 100% correct for -25% cutoff (20/20 negative). 100% correct for +25% cutoff (0/20 negative, 20/20 positive). |
| MET 500 | 500 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 23-26 Negative / 24-27 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 25-/25+) | Configuration 1: 95% correct for -25% cutoff (19/20 negative, 1/20 positive). 95% correct for +25% cutoff (1/20 negative, 19/20 positive). |
| MDMA 500 | 500 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 22-25 Negative / 25-28 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 24-/26+) | Configuration 1: 100% correct for -25% cutoff (20/20 negative). 95% correct for +25% cutoff (1/20 negative, 19/20 positive). |
| MOP 300 | 300 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 22-26 Negative / 24-28 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 25-/25+) | Configuration 1: 95% correct for -25% cutoff (19/20 negative, 1/20 positive). 100% correct for +25% cutoff (0/20 negative, 20/20 positive). |
| MTD 300 | 300 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 22-27 Negative / 23-28 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 24-/26+) | Configuration 1: 100% correct for -25% cutoff (20/20 negative). 95% correct for +25% cutoff (1/20 negative, 19/20 positive). |
| OXY 100 | 100 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 23-27 Negative / 23-27 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 27-/23+) | Configuration 1: 95% correct for -25% cutoff (19/20 negative, 1/20 positive). 100% correct for +25% cutoff (0/20 negative, 20/20 positive). |
| PCP 25 | 25 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 22-26 Negative / 24-28 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 26-/24+) | Configuration 1: 100% correct for -25% cutoff (20/20 negative). 95% correct for +25% cutoff (1/20 negative, 19/20 positive). |
| PPX 300 | 300 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 25-28 Negative / 22-25 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 25-/25+) | Configuration 1: 100% correct for -25% cutoff (20/20 negative). 95% correct for +25% cutoff (1/20 negative, 19/20 positive). |
| TCA 1000 | 1000 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 22-27 Negative / 23-28 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 27-/23+) | Configuration 1: 95% correct for -25% cutoff (19/20 negative, 1/20 positive). 100% correct for +25% cutoff (0/20 negative, 20/20 positive). |
| THC 50 | 50 ng/mL | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 23-27 Negative / 23-27 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 23-/27+) | Configuration 1: 90% correct for -25% cutoff (18/20 negative, 2/20 positive). 95% correct for +25% cutoff (1/20 negative, 19/20 positive). |
| AMP 1000 | 1000 ng/mL (Config 2) | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 24-27 Negative / 23-26 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 25-/25+) | Configuration 2: 95% correct for -25% cutoff (19/20 negative, 1/20 positive). 100% correct for +25% cutoff (0/20 negative, 20/20 positive). |
| COC 300 | 300 ng/mL (Config 2) | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 24-27 Negative / 23-26 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 27-/23+) | Configuration 2: 100% correct for -25% cutoff (20/20 negative). 95% correct for +25% cutoff (1/20 negative, 19/20 positive). |
| MET 1000 | 1000 ng/mL (Config 2) | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 23-26 Negative / 24-27 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 26-/24+) | Configuration 2: 95% correct for -25% cutoff (19/20 negative, 1/20 positive). 100% correct for +25% cutoff (0/20 negative, 20/20 positive). |
| OPI 2000 | 2000 ng/mL (Config 2) | Consistent classification of -25% Cutoff samples as negative and +25% Cutoff samples as positive. | Negative: 49-50/50, Positive: 0-1/50 for -25% cutoff. Negative: 0-1/50, Positive: 49-50/50 for +25% cutoff. At Cutoff: 23-27 Negative / 23-27 Positive (e.g., Lot I: 23-/27+) | Configuration 2: 95% correct for -25% cutoff (19/20 negative, 1/20 positive). 100% correct for +25% cutoff (0/20 negative, 20/20 positive). |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
-
Precision Studies (Analytical Performance):
- Sample Size: For each drug and each concentration point (-100%, -75%, -50%, -25%, cutoff, +25%, +50%, +75%, +100% cutoff), 50 tests were performed per lot across 3 lots (2 runs/day for 25 days). This means 3 lots x 50 tests = 150 tests per concentration per drug. With 9 concentration points, it is 1350 tests per drug. With 15 drugs, roughly 20,250 tests in total.
- Data Provenance: The samples were prepared by spiking target drugs into drug-free urine samples. Drug-free urine samples were used for the -100% cutoff. The document does not specify the country of origin of the "drug-free urine samples" or the location where the samples were collected. It is retrospective in the sense that samples were prepared in a lab setting rather than collected prospectively from patients.
-
Comparison Studies (Standalone Performance):
- Sample Size: For each drug, 80 unaltered urine samples (40 negative and 40 positive) were used. These were then tested by 3 operators.
- Data Provenance: "Unaltered urine samples" were used. The document does not specify the country of origin. This appears to be retrospective as the samples were pre-collected and blinded.
-
Lay-User Study:
- Sample Size: 280 participants were recruited.
- 140 participants (66 males, 74 females) for Configuration 1 (AMP 500, MET 500, MOP 300, COC 150, BAR 300, BZO 300, BUP 10, EDDP 300, MDMA 500, MTD 300, OXY 100, PCP 25, PPX 300, TCA 1000, THC 50).
- 140 participants (72 males, 68 females) for Configuration 2 (AMP 1000, MET 1000, OPI 2000 (MOP 2000), COC 300, BAR 300, BZO 300, BUP 10, EDDP 300, MDMA 500, MTD 300, OXY 100, PCP 25, PPX 300, TCA 1000, THC 50).
- Each participant tested "one blind labeled test solution, and one test device." The concentration points tested were -100%, +/-75%, +/-50%, +/-25% of the cutoff. Given there are 15 assays per cup, and 8 concentration points, and 20 tests per concentration point, this implies a total of 15 * 8 * 20 = 2400 individual assay results per configuration (which aligns roughly with 140 participants given each participant runs multiple assays/drugs).
- Data Provenance: Samples were "prepared at the following concentrations; -100%, +/-75%, +/-50%, +/-25% of the cutoff by spiking drug(s) into drug free-pooled urine specimens." It doesn't state the source of the "drug free-pooled urine specimens" or the country of origin. This is a retrospective study based on prepared samples.
- Sample Size: 280 participants were recruited.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
- Ground Truth Method: LC/MS or LC/MS/MS (Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry) was used to confirm sample concentrations and establish the ground truth for all studies (Precision, Comparison, Lay-User).
- Number/Qualifications of Experts: The document does not specify human experts for establishing ground truth. The LC/MS data is considered the analytical "gold standard" or ground truth for drug concentrations in urine.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
- No human adjudication method is described. The ground truth in all studies is based on LC/MS results. The device results (positive/negative) are compared directly to the quantitative LC/MS measurements relative to the specified cutoff.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
- There was no MRMC comparative effectiveness study involving human readers with/without AI assistance. The device is a lateral flow immunoassay intended for direct interpretation of visual lines, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
- Yes, standalone performance was done.
- Precision Studies: This directly assesses the device's ability to correctly classify samples based on LC/MS confirmed concentrations, without human interpretation variability being the primary focus. The results "-/+" notation at each concentration reflects the count of negative and positive results from the device, which are then compared to the known concentration.
- Comparison Studies: These studies explicitly compare the "Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup" results (interpreted by three operators) directly against LC/MS results. While operators are involved in reading, the intent is to show the device's inherent performance when read, validating its accuracy against the gold standard. The "discordant results" further confirm areas where the device's output (even if read by a human) deviates from clinical truth (LC/MS).
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
- Analytical Ground Truth: LC/MS or LC/MS/MS (Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry) was used as the ground truth method to confirm the concentrations of all samples. This is a highly accurate and quantitative chemical analysis method.
8. The sample size for the training set
- This device is a lateral flow immunoassay, not a machine learning or AI algorithm. Therefore, there is no "training set" in the context of machine learning. The device's performance is determined by its inherent biochemical design (antigen-antibody reactions) and manufacturing consistency, not by learning from a dataset.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
- As stated in point 8, there is no "training set" for this type of device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the FDA logo is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
November 10, 2022
Vivachek Biotech (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd % Joe Shia Director LSI International 540 E Diamond Avenue, Suite I Gaithersburg, MD 20877
Re: K222667
Trade/Device Name: Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup, Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.3100 Regulation Name: Amphetamine test system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NFT, NGL, PTH, NFV, NFY, PTG, NGG, OBF, QAW, NFW, LCM Dated: September 2, 2022 Received: September 6, 2022
Dear Joe Shia:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Paula
Digitally signed by
Paula Caposino -S
Caposino -S Date: 2022.11.10
14:59:10 -05'00'
Paula Caposino, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Division Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Devices OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K222667
Device Name
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup
Indications for Use (Describe)
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Marijuana in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 ng/mL |
| Marijuana (THC) | 50 ng/mL |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup offers any combinations from 2 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. It is intended for OTC use.
The tests may vield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine. Oxazepam, Secobarbital. Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
_ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (6/20)
Page 1 of 1
EF PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
{4}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K222667
Device Name
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx
Indications for Use (Describe)
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 ng/mL |
| Cannabinoids (THC) | 50 ng/mL |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx offers any combinations from 2 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. It is intended for prescription use.
The tests may vield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine. Oxazepam, Secobarbital. Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
× Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (6/20)
Page 1 of 1
EF PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
{6}------------------------------------------------
510(k) SUMMARY
| 510(k) Number | K222667 | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Date | November 7, 2022 |
| 2 | Submitter | VivaChek Biotech (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. |
| Level 2, Block 2, 146 East Chaofeng Rd. | ||
| Hangzhou, China | ||
| 3 | Contact Person | Joe Shia |
| LSI International Inc. | ||
| 504 East Diamond Ave., Suite I | ||
| Gaithersburg, MD 20877 | ||
| Telephone: 240-505-7880 | ||
| Fax: 301-916-6213 | ||
| Email: shiajl@yahoo.com | ||
- 4 Device Name Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx
- 5 Classification
| Class II | ||
|---|---|---|
| Product CodeTarget Drug | Regulation Section | Cup |
| NFTAmphetamine (AMP) | 862.3100, Amphetamine Test System | Toxicology |
| NGLBuprenorphine (BUP) | 862.3650, Opiate Test System | Toxicology |
| PTHSecobarbital (BAR) | 862.3150, Barbiturate Test System | Toxicology |
| NFVOxazepam (BZO) | 862.3170,Benzodiazepine Test System | Toxicology |
| NFYCocaine (COC) | 862.3250, Cocaine Test System | Toxicology |
| PTG2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine(EDDP) | 862.3620, Methadone Test System | Toxicology |
| NGGMethamphetamine(MET) | 862.3610,Methamphetamine Test System | Toxicology |
| NGGMethylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 862.3610,Methamphetamine Test System | Toxicology |
| NGL | 862.3650, Opiate Test System | Toxicology |
{7}------------------------------------------------
| Morphine (MOP/OPI) | ||
|---|---|---|
| PTG | 862.3620, Methadone Test System | Toxicology |
| Methadone (MTD) | ||
| NGL | 862.3650, Opiate Test System | Toxicology |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | ||
| LCM | Unclassified | Toxicology |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | ||
| QBF | 862.3700 Propoxyphene test system. | Toxicology |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | ||
| QAW | 862.3910 Tricyclic antidepressant drugs test system | Toxicology |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | ||
| NFW | 862.3870, Cannabinoids Test System | Toxicology |
| Cannabinoids (THC 50) |
Predicate Device 6. K182701
Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup
7. Intended Use
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Marijuana in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 ng/mL |
| Marijuana (THC) | 50 ng/mL |
{8}------------------------------------------------
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup offers any combinations from 2 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. It is intended for OTC use.
The tests may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Nortriptyline, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 ng/mL |
| Cannabinoids (THC) | 50 ng/mL |
{9}------------------------------------------------
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx offers any combinations from 2 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. It is intended for prescription use.
The tests may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Nortriptyline, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
8. Device Description
The Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup and Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx are rapid, singleuse in vitro diagnostic devices. Each test kit contains a test device in one pouch. One pouch contains a test Wisdiag Cup and two desiccants, and a package insert. The Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup is intended for over-the-counter use and the Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx is intended for prescription use.
| Item | Proposed Device | Predicate(K182701) |
|---|---|---|
| Indication(s) for use | For the qualitative determination of Amphetamine,Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methamphetamine,Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone,Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline andCannabinoids in human urine. | Same |
| Methodology | Competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assaybased on antigen-antibody reaction | Same |
| Type of Test | Qualitative | Same |
| Specimen Type | Human urine | Same |
| Target Drug andCut Off Values | Target Drug | Cutoff (ng/mL) |
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 or 500 | |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 | |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 | |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 | |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 or 150 |
9. Substantial Equivalence Information
{10}------------------------------------------------
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 or 500 | |
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 | |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 or 300 | |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 | |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 | |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 | |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 | |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 | |
| Cannabinoids (THC 50) | 50 | |
| Configurations | Test Cup | Cup |
| Intended Use | Prescription Use and over-the-counter use | For over-the-counter use |
10. Test Principle
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup and Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx are rapid tests for the qualitative detection of Amphetamine, Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2-ethylidene-1.5-dimethyl-3.3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in urine samples. They are lateral flow chromatographic immunoassay. When urine sample is added to the cup device, urine is absorbed into the test strip and migrates upwards by capillary action. If the concentration of target drug presented in the urine sample is below the cutoff level, the target drug will not saturate the binding sites of its specific monoclonal antibody-coated particles. The antibody-coated particles will then be captured by immobilized drug-conjugate and a visible colored band will be formed on the test line region. If the concentration of target is beyond the cutoff level, the target drug will saturate the binding sites of its specific monoclonal antibody-particles, thus the antibody-coated particles will not be captured by immobilized drug-conjugate hence no colored band will be formed on the test line region.
A band should be formed on the control line region regardless of target drug or metabolite in the sample to indicate that the tests have been performed properly.
11. Performance Characteristics
1. Analytical Performance
- a. Precision
Precision studies were carried out for samples with concentrations of -100% cut off, -75% cut off, -50% cut off, -25% cut off, cutoff, +25% cut off, +50% cut off, +75% cut off and +100% cut off. Samples with concentration of -100% cutoff were drug-free urines samples. Other samples were prepared by spiking target drug in drug-free urine samples. Each drug concentration was confirmed by LC/MS. For each concentration, tests were performed two runs per day for 25 days using three lots of test Cups. The results obtained are summarized in the following tables:
{11}------------------------------------------------
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.0 | 17.1 | 13.6 | 11.8 | 10.2 | 6.9 | 5.4 | 2.7 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup BUP 10
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup PCP 25
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 52.1 | 43.1 | 37.3 | 29.4 | 25.2 | 17.7 | 12.2 | 6.5 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 22-/28+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup THC 50
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96.5 | 84.3 | 75.7 | 60.1 | 52.5 | 35.9 | 24.1 | 12.1 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup OXY 100
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200.3 | 177.1 | 158.9 | 131.7 | 108.5 | 78.0 | 51.6 | 27.6 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
{12}------------------------------------------------
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup BAR 300
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 588.4 | 525.8 | 457.6 | 383.8 | 301.6 | 228.3 | 157.1 | 80.2 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 22-/28+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup BZO 300
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 596.1 | 536.5 | 470.4 | 370.3 | 290.4 | 219.8 | 157.3 | 78.5 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup EDDP 300
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL) | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 646.2 | 545.3 | 455.1 | 371.0 | 290.7 | 229.5 | 148.8 | 77.0 | 0 | |
| Lot Number | |||||||||
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 28-/22+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup MTD 300
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 620.5 | 547.0 | 469.9 | 380.9 | 328.6 | 240.2 | 143.9 | 71.4 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 22-/28+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
{13}------------------------------------------------
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup MOP 300
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | ||
| 622.4 | 530.2 | 468.8 | 381.8 | 322.8 | 220.8 | 159.0 | 75.4 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 22-/28+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup PPX 300
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 622.3 | 562.7 | 451.3 | 383.3 | 297.7 | 218.3 | 152.5 | 75.8 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 28-/22+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup COC 150
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 298.2 | 246.1 | 237.0 | 193.6 | 157.7 | 106.5 | 76.2 | 36.0 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 28-/22+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup MDMA 500
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 1048.5 | 861.5 | 740.8 | 614.9 | 522.8 | 342.0 | 250.6 | 128.4 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 22-/28+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
{14}------------------------------------------------
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup TCA 1000
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL) | 2175.2 | 1841.2 | 1597.5 | 1261.6 | 1081.5 | 708.2 | 493.1 | 251.5 | 0 |
| Lot Number | |||||||||
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 22-/28+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup AMP 500
| Concentrationby LC/MS(ng/mL) | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lot Number | 1011.8 | 846.4 | 772.7 | 646.8 | 544.3 | 357.6 | 225.0 | 120.9 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup MET 500
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL) | 1072.7 | 873.9 | 731.7 | 633.1 | 477.8 | 386.1 | 249.2 | 122.5 | 0 |
| Lot Number | |||||||||
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup OPI 2000
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 4208.2 | 3672.9 | 3119.0 | 2590.5 | 2050.0 | 1460.4 | 1007.5 | 493.0 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
{15}------------------------------------------------
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup COC 300
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 610.6 | 558.5 | 461.6 | 373.4 | 329.9 | 235.6 | 156.7 | 74.5 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup AMP 1000
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS(ng/mL) | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| Lot Number | 1933.3 | 1805.2 | 1562.7 | 1262.0 | 1051.1 | 812.0 | 540.9 | 271.9 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 25-/25+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 27-/23+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup MET 1000
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| 1954.6 | 1824.2 | 1593.1 | 1304.9 | 1003.4 | 736.7 | 464.8 | 251.1 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 26-/24+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 24-/26+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 23-/27+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
The following cutoff values are verified:
| Target Drug | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
{16}------------------------------------------------
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
|---|---|
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 ng/mL |
| Cannabinoids (THC 50) | 50 ng/mL |
b. Linearity
Not applicable
c. Stability
The devices are stable at 2-30℃ for 24 months based on accelerated stability studies at 55℃.
d. Interference
Potential interfering substances were added to drug-free urine samples with target drugs of -25% cutoff and +25% cutoff level.
Compounds that show no interference at a concentration of 100µg/mL are summarized in the following table.
| Acetaminophen | Acetophenetidin | Acetylsalicylic Acid |
|---|---|---|
| Acyclovir | Amiodarone Hydrochloride | Apomorphine |
| Afrin | Albumin (100mg/dL) | Amlodipine Mesylate |
| Aminophylline | Amoxicillin | Aripiprazole |
| Aminopyrine | Ampicillin | Aspartame |
| Benzilic Acid | Atropine | Atomoxetine |
| Benzoic Acid | Carbamazepine | Atorvastatin Calcium |
| Bilirubin | Cefradine | Chloramphenicol |
| Bupropion | Cephalexin | Chlorothiazide |
| Captopril | Chloral Hydrate | Chloroquine |
| Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride | Clonidine | Cholesterol |
| Citalopram | Clopidogrel Hydrogen Sulphate | (-) Cotinine |
| Clarithromycin | Clozapine | chlorpheniramine |
| Deoxy- corticosterone | D,L-Tyrosine | D,L-Octopamine |
| Dextromethorphan | Digoxin | D,L-Propranolol |
| Diclofenac | Diphenhydramine | D-Norpropoxy- phene |
| Diflunisal | Dirithromycin | Domperidone |
{17}------------------------------------------------
| D-Pseudo- ephedrine | Ecgonine Methyl Ester | Doxylamine |
|---|---|---|
| Duloxetine | Effexor | Epinephrine Hydrochloride |
| Dicyclomine | Enalapril Maleate | Erythromycin |
| β-Estradiol | Fentanyl Citrate | Esomeprazole Magnesium |
| Ethanol (1%) | Fluoxetine Hydrochloride | Furosemide |
| Fenofibrate | Fluvoxamine | Gabapentin |
| Fenoprofen | Glucose | Gentisic Acid |
| Glibenclamide | Haloperidol | 3-Hydroxy- tyramine |
| Gliclazide | Hemoglobin | Isosorbide Dinitrate |
| Glipizide | Ketamine | Isoxsuprine |
| Ibuprofen | Kratom powder | Lamotrigine |
| Ketoconazole | Labetalol | Levofloxacin Hydrochloride |
| Ketoprofen | Liverite | Levonorgestrel |
| Lidocaine Hydrochloride | Loperamide | Levothyroxine Sodium |
| Lisinopril | Loratadine | Minocycline |
| Lithium Carbonate | Naproxen | Nalidixic Acid |
| Metoprolol Tartrate | Mifepristone | Niacinamide |
| Magnesium | Mirtazapine | Nifedipine |
| Meperidine | Montelukast Sodium | Nikethamide |
| Meprobamate | Phenelzine | Sulfamethazine |
| Mosapride Citrate | Pioglitazone Hydrochloride | Sulindac |
| Maprotiline | Piracetam | Tetrahydrocortisone 3 -acetate |
| Nimodipine | Pravastatin Sodium | Tetrahydrocortisone 3-(β-D-glucuronide) |
| Norethindrone | Prednisone | Tetrahydrozoline |
| N-Acetylprocain-amide | Propylthiouracil | Tetracycline |
| O-Hydroxyhippu-ric Acid | Promethazine | Thiamine |
| Olanzapine | Quetiapine Fumarate | Thioridazine |
| Omeprazole | Quinine | Topiramate |
| Oxalic Acid | Ranitidine | Tramadol Hydrochloride |
| Oxolinic Acid | Rifampicin | Trazodone Hydrochloride |
| Oxymetazoline | Risperidone | Triamterene |
| Ondansetran | Salicylic Acid | Trifluoperazine |
| Paliperidone | Serotonin | Trimethoprim |
| Pantoprazole | Sertraline Hydrochloride | Uric Acid |
| Papaverine | Sildenafil Citrate | Valproate |
| Paroxetine Hydrochloride | Simvastatin | Verapamil |
| Penfluridol | Sodium Valproate | Vitamin B2 |
| PenicillinV Potassium | Spironolactone | Vitamin C |
{18}------------------------------------------------
- Specificity e.
To test the specificity, drug metabolites and other components that are likely to cross-react in urine samples were spiked into drug-free urine. These urine samples were tested using three lots of each device.
Percent cross-reactivity, provided in the below table, was calculated as the cutoff concentration divided by the concentration of analyte tested that yielded a positive result, multiplied by 100; compounds that did not yield a positive result at the highest concentration tested have relative cross reactivity results represented by a dash in the table below:
| BUP 10 (Buprenorphine,Cutoff=10 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Buprenorphine -3-D-Glucuronide | 15 | 66.67% |
| Norbuprenorphine | 20 | 50% |
| Norbuprenorphine-3-D-Glucuronide | 200 | 5% |
| Morphine | >100000 | - |
| Oxymorphone | >100000 | - |
| Hydromorphone | >100000 | - |
| PCP (Phencyclidine)(Phencyclidine,Cutoff=25 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| 4-Hydroxyphencyclidine | 12500 | 0.2% |
| THC 50(11-nor-Δ9-THC-9-COOH,Cutoff=50 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| (-)-11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-THC | 50 | 100% |
| 11-nor-Δ8-THC-9-COOH | 50 | 100% |
| 11-nor-Δ9-THC-carboxy glucuronide | 100 | 50% |
| Cannabidiol | 100,000 | -- |
| Cannabinol | 100,000 | -- |
| Δ8- Tetrahydrocannabinol | 15,000 | 0.5% |
| Δ9- Tetrahydrocannabinol | 15,000 | 0.5% |
| 11-hydroxy-Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol | 5,000 | 1% |
| OXY 100(Oxycodone, Cutoff=100 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Dihydrocodeine | 20,000 | 0.5% |
| Hydrocodone | 80 | 125% |
| Oxymorphone | 1,000 | 10% |
{19}------------------------------------------------
| Codeine | 100,000 | -- |
|---|---|---|
| Hydromorphone | 36,000 | 0.278% |
| Morphine | 100,000 | -- |
| Acetylmorphine | 100,000 | -- |
| Buprenorphine | 100,000 | -- |
| Ethylmorphine | 100,000 | -- |
| Thebaine | 100,000 | -- |
| COC 150(Benzoylecgonine, Cutoff=150 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Cocaine | 375 | 40% |
| Cocaethylene | 6,250 | 2.4% |
| Ecgonine | 16,000 | <1% |
| Ecgonine methyl ester | 100,000 | -- |
| Norcocaine | 100,000 | -- |
| BAR 300(Secobarbital, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Amobarbital | 300 | 100% |
| Alphenol | 600 | 50% |
| Aprobarbital | 200 | 150% |
| Butabarbital | 100 | 300% |
| Butethal | 200 | 150% |
| Butalbital | 2,000 | 15% |
| Cyclopentobarbital | 400 | 75% |
| Pentobarbital | 200 | 150% |
| Phenobarbital | 200 | 150% |
| BZO 300(Oxazepam, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Alprazolam | 190 | 63.3% |
| a-Hydroxyalprazolam | 300 | 100% |
| Bromazepam | 500 | 60% |
| Chlordiazepoxide | 1,500 | 20% |
| Clobazam | 110 | 272.7% |
| Clonazepam | 100,000 | -- |
| Clorazepate dipotassium | 300 | 100% |
| Delorazepam | 100,000 | -- |
| Desalkylflurazepam | 200 | 150% |
{20}------------------------------------------------
| Diazepam | 190 | 157.9% |
|---|---|---|
| Estazolam | 5,000 | 6% |
| Flunitrazepam | 400 | 75% |
| Midazolam | 2,200 | 13.6% |
| Nitrazepam | 200 | 150% |
| Norchlordiazepoxide | 800 | 37.5% |
| Nordiazepam | 150 | 200% |
| Temazepam | 100 | 300% |
| Triazolam | 6,000 | 5% |
| Demoxepam | 2,000 | 15% |
| Flurazepam | 100,000 | -- |
| D,L-Lorazepam | 75,000 | 4% |
| EDDP 300(2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Cutoff = 300 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Methadone | >100000 | - |
| EMDP | >100000 | - |
| Doxylamine | >100000 | - |
| Disopyramide | >100000 | - |
| LAAM (Levo-alpha-acetylmethadol) HCl | >100000 | - |
| Alpha Methadol | >100000 | - |
| MTD 300(Methadone, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Doxylamine | >100000 | - |
| EDDP | >100000 | - |
| EMDP | >100000 | - |
| LAAM | >100000 | - |
| Alpha Methadol | >100000 | - |
| MOP 300(Morphine, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Normorphine | 300 | 100% |
| Codeine | 300 | 100% |
| s-Monoacetylmorphine | 300 | 100% |
| Ethyl Morphine | 200 | 150% |
| Heroin | 300 | 100% |
| Hydrocodone | 700 | 42.8% |
| Hydromorphone | 200 | 150% |
{21}------------------------------------------------
| Morphinie-3-β-d-glucuronide | 1,000 | 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Oxycodone | 100,000 | -- |
| Oxymorphone | 100,000 | -- |
| Thebaine | 20,000 | 1.5% |
| Levorphanol | 10,000 | 3% |
| 6-Monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM) | 300 | 100% |
| Norcodeine | 6,250 | 4.8% |
| Procaine | 100,000 | -- |
| PPX 300(d-Propoxyphene, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| d-Norpropoxyphene | 300 | 100% |
| MDMA 500(3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine HCl,Cutoff=500ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine HCl (MDA) | 4,000 | 12.5% |
| 3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDE) | 400 | 125% |
| d-methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| d-amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| l-methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| l-amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| AMP (Amphetamine) (Amphetamine,Cutoff=500ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| l-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| dl- Amphetamine | 1,500 | 33.3% |
| (+/-) 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) | 500 | 100% |
| Phentermine | 6,000 | 8.3% |
| Hydroxyamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| d-Methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| l-Methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| (+/-) 3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDE) | >100000 | - |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | >100000 | - |
| β-Phenylethylamine | >100000 | - |
| Tyramine | >100000 | - |
| p-Hydroxynorephedrine | >100000 | - |
| Phenylpropanolamine | >100000 | - |
{22}------------------------------------------------
| (±)Phenylpropanolamine | >100000 | - |
|---|---|---|
| p-Hydroxyamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| d/l-Norephedrine | >100000 | - |
| Benzphetamine | >100000 | - |
| l-Ephedrine | >100000 | - |
| l-Epinephrine | >100000 | - |
| d/l-Epinephrine | >100000 | - |
| Ephedrine | >100000 | - |
| MET 500(D(+)-Methamphetamine, Cutoff=500ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxy-n-ethylamphetamine(MDE) | 12,500 | 4% |
| D/L-Methamphetamine | 500 | 100% |
| p-Hydroxymethamphetamine | 15,000 | 3.3% |
| D-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| L-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| Chloroquine | 50,000 | 1% |
| (+/-)-Ephedrine | 100,000 | - |
| (-)-Methamphetamine | 65,000 | 0.8% |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) | >100000 | - |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA) | 4,000 | 12.5% |
| β-Phenylethylamine | 25,000 | 2% |
| Trimethobenzamide | 10,000 | 5% |
| d,l-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| Mephentermine | 25,000 | 2% |
| (1R,2S)-(-)-Ephedrine | >100000 | - |
| 1-phenylephrine | >100000 | - |
| L-Methamphetamine | 65,000 | 0.8% |
| TCA 1000(Nortriptyline, Cutoff=1000ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Nordoxepine | 1,000 | 100% |
| Trimipramine | 3,000 | 33.3% |
| Amitriptyline | 450 | 222.2% |
| Promazine | 1,500 | 66.7% |
| Desipramine | 200 | 500% |
| Imipramine | 80 | 1250% |
{23}------------------------------------------------
| Clomipramine | 1,200 | 83.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Doxepin | 2,000 | 50% |
| Maprotiline | 2,000 | 50% |
| Promethazine | >100,000 | -- |
| Cyclobenzaprine | 800 | 125% |
| Norclomipramine | 12,500 | 8% |
| COC 300(Benzoylecgonine, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Cocaine | 780 | 38.5% |
| Cocaethylene | 12,500 | 2.4% |
| Ecgonine | 32,000 | 0.9% |
| Ecgonine methyl ester | 100,000 | 0.3% |
| Norcocaine | 100,000 | 0.3% |
| AMP 1000(d-Amphetamine, Cutoff=1000ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| l-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| dl- Amphetamine | 3,000 | 33.3% |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) | 1,000 | 100%, |
| Phentermine | 6,000 | 16.7% |
| Hydroxyamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| d-Methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| l-Methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine(MDE) | >100000 | - |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA) | >100000 | - |
| β-Phenylethylamine | >100000 | - |
| Tyramine | >100000 | - |
| p-Hydroxynorephedrine | >100000 | - |
| Phenylpropanolamine | >100000 | - |
| (±)Phenylpropanolamine | >100000 | - |
| p-Hydroxyamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| d/l-Norephedrine | >100000 | - |
| Benzphetamine | >100000 | - |
| l-Ephedrine | >100000 | - |
| l-Epinephrine | >100000 | - |
| d/l-Epinephrine | >100000 | - |
| Ephedrine | >100000 | - |
{24}------------------------------------------------
| MET 1000(D(+)-Methamphetamine, Cutoff=1000ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxy-n-ethylamphetamine(MDE) | 25,000 | 4% |
| D/L-Methamphetamine | 1,000 | 100% |
| p-Hydroxymethamphetamine | 30,000 | 0.3% |
| D-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| L-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| Chloroquine | 50,000 | 2% |
| (+/-)-Ephedrine | >100000 | - |
| (-)-Methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) | >100000 | - |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA) | 8,000 | 12.5% |
| β-Phenylethylamine | 50,000 | 2% |
| Trimethobenzamide | 20,000 | 5% |
| d,l-Amphetamine | >100000 | - |
| Mephetermine | 50,000 | 2% |
| (1R,2S)-(-)-Ephedrine | >100000 | - |
| 1-phenylephrine | >100000 | - |
| L-Methamphetamine | >100000 | - |
| OPI 2000(Morphine, Cutoff=2000ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Normorphine | 50,000 | 4% |
| Codeine | 2,000 | 100% |
| s-Monoacetylmorphine | 2,000 | 100% |
| Ethyl Morphine | 1,500 | 133.3% |
| Heroin | 2,000 | 100% |
| Hydrocodone | 12,500 | 16% |
| Hydromorphone | 3,500 | 57.1% |
| Morphinie-3-β-d-glucuronide | 2,000 | 100% |
| Oxycodone | 25,000 | 8% |
| Oxymorphone | 25,000 | 8% |
| Thebaine | 50,000 | 4% |
| Levorphanol | 75,000 | 2.7% |
| 6-Monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM) | 2,000 | 100% |
| Norcodeine | 12,500 | 16% |
{25}------------------------------------------------
| Procaine | >100,000 | -- |
|---|---|---|
| ---------- | ---------- | ---- |
- f. Effect of Urine Specific Gravity and Urine pH
To investigate the effect of urine specific gravity, urine samples with specific gravity from 1.000 to 1.035 were spiked with target drugs at +25% cutoff and -25% cutoff levels. Three Operators tested each sample using test devices from three different lots. The results were all positive for samples at +25% cutoff and all negative for samples at -25% cutoff, indicating that urine specific gravity between 1.000 and 1.035 has no effect on the accuracy and precision of the test device.
To investigate the effect of urine pH, urine samples with pH value from 4 to 9 were spiked with target drugs at +25% cutoff and -25% cutoff levels. Three Operators tested each sample using test devices from three different lots. The results were all positive for samples at +25% cutoff and all negative for samples at -25% cutoff, indicating that urine pH value between 4.0 and 9.0 has no effect on the accuracy and precision of the test device.
-
- Comparison Studies
The method comparison studies for Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup were performed in-house with three operators.
- Comparison Studies
Operators ran 80 (40 negative and 40 positive) unaltered urine samples were blind labeled and compared to LC/MS results. The results are presented in the table below:
For Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup:
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OperatorA | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 12 | 17 | 0 | 0 | |
| OperatorB | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 12 | 17 | 0 | 0 | |
| OperatorC | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Negative | 10 | 12 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
AMP 500
Discordant Results for AMP 500:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | AMP136 | 499.0 | + |
| Operator B | AMP028 | 477.4 | + |
| Operator C | AMP136 | 499.0 | + |
{26}------------------------------------------------
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 15 | 14 | 2 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 20 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 20 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 0 |
Discordant Results for BUP 10:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | BUP029 | 10.2 | - |
| Operator C | BUP029 | 10.2 | - |
| Operator A | BUP055 | 10.8 | - |
| Operator C | BUP055 | 10.8 | - |
| Operator A | BUP058 | 9.8 | + |
| Operator B | BUP058 | 9.8 | + |
| Operator B | BUP070 | 9.9 | + |
BAR 300
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 20 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 16 | 14 | 3 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 20 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 16 | 14 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for BAR 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | BAR011 | 303.8 | - |
| Operator B | BAR011 | 303.8 | - |
| Operator C | BAR011 | 303.8 | - |
| Operator A | BAR017 | 300.9 | - |
{27}------------------------------------------------
| Operator B | BAR017 | 300.9 | - |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | BAR033 | 312.2 | - |
BZO 300
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 23 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 23 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 23 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for BZO 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | BZO018 | 303.6 | - |
| Operator B | BZO018 | 303.6 | - |
| Operator B | BZO058 | 307.2 | - |
COC 150
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS(less than -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50% and theCutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | HighPositive byLC/MS(greaterthan +50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 22 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 14 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for COC 150:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | COC046 | 144.8 | + |
| Operator B | COC146 | 148.9 | + |
| Operator C | COC128 | 162.8 | - |
{28}------------------------------------------------
EDDP 300
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50% and theCutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 0 | |
| Operator B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 14 | 0 | 0 | |
| Operator C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for EDDP 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator B | EDDP075 | 290.6 | + |
| Operator C | EDDP075 | 290.6 | + |
| Operator A | EDDP010 | 318.6 | - |
| Operator A | EDDP061 | 318.5 | - |
MET 500
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 20 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MET 500:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | MET062 | 519.5 | - |
| Operator A | MET102 | 521.1 | - |
| Operator B | MET102 | 521.1 | - |
MDMA 500
{29}------------------------------------------------
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OperatorA | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 20 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| OperatorB | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 17 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| OperatorC | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MDMA 500:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | MDMA026 | 488.3 | + |
| Operator C | MDMA026 | 488.3 | + |
| Operator A | MDMA060 | 492.0 | + |
MOP 300
| WisdiagCup | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug-Free | ||||||
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 14 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 22 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 14 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MOP 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator B | MOP057 | 293.2 | + |
| Operator B | MOP150 | 282.8 | + |
MTD 300
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ---------------- | -- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
{30}------------------------------------------------
| (Between thecutoff and+50%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 20 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 20 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 16 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MTD 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator B | MTD022 | 298.2 | + |
| Operator B | MTD049 | 289.2 | + |
| Operator C | MTD049 | 289.2 | + |
| Operator A | MTD003 | 309.1 | - |
| Operator A | MTD045 | 301.7 | - |
OXY 100
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OperatorA | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | |
| OperatorB | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 16 | 1 | 0 | |
| OperatorC | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 16 | 2 | 0 |
Discordant Results for OXY 100:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | OXY012 | 96.3 | + |
| Operator A | OXY071 | 95.2 | + |
| Operator B | OXY002 | 101.4 | - |
| Operator C | OXY002 | 101.4 | - |
| Operator C | OXY006 | 111.0 | - |
PCP 25
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative by | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS | High Positiveby LC/MS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ---------------- | ----------- | -------------------- | ------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | --------------------------- |
{31}------------------------------------------------
| LC/MS (lessthan -50%) | (Between -50%and the Cutoff) | (Between thecutoff and+50%) | (greater than+50%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 18 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 18 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 18 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 18 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 18 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for PCP 25:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | PCP003 | 22.4 | + |
| Operator B | PCP060 | 22.7 | + |
| Operator C | PCP060 | 22.7 | + |
| Operator A | PCP023 | 25.5 | - |
| Operator B | PCP023 | 25.5 | - |
PPX 300
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 21 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 16 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 21 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 16 | 14 | 3 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 21 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for PPX 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | PPX024 | 292.5 | + |
| Operator A | PPX029 | 291.4 | + |
| Operator C | PPX024 | 292.5 | + |
| Operator B | PPX043 | 300.7 | - |
| Operator B | PPX053 | 300.8 | - |
| Operator B | PPX073 | 303.4 | - |
| Operator C | PPX043 | 300.7 | - |
TCA 1000
{32}------------------------------------------------
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 22 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 22 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 15 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 22 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for TCA 1000:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator B | TCA005 | 991.3 | + |
| Operator C | TCA005 | 991.3 | + |
| Operator C | TCA043 | 969.0 | + |
| Operator A | TCA010 | 1015.1 | - |
| Operator A | TCA052 | 1015.9 | - |
THC 50
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OperatorA | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 22 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 2 | 0 |
| OperatorB | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 22 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 1 | 0 |
| OperatorC | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 22 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 16 | 14 | 3 | 0 |
Discordant Results for THC 50:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | THC014 | 47.8 | + |
| Operator B | THC054 | 46.8 | + |
| Operator A | THC062 | 50.9 | - |
| Operator A | THC069 | 53.5 | - |
| Operator B | THC076 | 53.9 | - |
{33}------------------------------------------------
| Operator C | THC036 | 50.5 | - |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator C | THC062 | 50.9 | - |
| Operator C | THC069 | 53.5 | - |
AMP 1000
| WisdiagCup | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug-Free | ||||||
| OperatorA | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 0 | |
| OperatorB | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 14 | 0 | 0 | |
| OperatorC | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 21 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for AMP 1000:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator B | AMP116 | 998.8 | + |
| Operator A | AMP095 | 1035.1 | - |
| Operator A | AMP102 | 1048.4 | - |
| Operator C | AMP102 | 1048.4 | - |
COC 300
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OperatorA | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 23 |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | |
| OperatorB | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 23 |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 16 | 2 | 0 | |
| OperatorC | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 23 |
| Negative | 10 | 14 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for COC 300:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator A | COC028 | 296.4 | + |
| Operator A | COC143 | 283.8 | + |
{34}------------------------------------------------
| Operator C | COC143 | 283.8 | + |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator B | COC033 | 317.7 | - |
| Operator B | COC138 | 318.7 | - |
MET 1000
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 19 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 13 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 19 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 13 | 17 | 2 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 19 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 13 | 17 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MET 1000:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator B | MET123 | 1049.5 | - |
| Operator B | MET138 | 1068.2 | - |
| Operator C | MET138 | 1068.2 | - |
OPI 2000
| WisdiagCup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and +50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 22 |
| A | Negative | 10 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 22 |
| B | Negative | 10 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Operator | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
| C | Negative | 10 | 16 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for OPI 2000:
| Operator | Sample Number | LC/MS Result | Hightop Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator B | MOP076 | 1943.3 | + |
| Operator A | MOP089 | 2070.0 | - |
| Operator A | MOP139 | 2105.7 | - |
{35}------------------------------------------------
Lay-user study:
A lay user study was performed using urine samples prepared at the following concentrations; -100%, +/-75%, +/-50%, +/-25% of the cutoff by spiking drug(s) into drug free-pooled urine specimens. The concentrations of the samples were confirmed by LC/MS or LC/MS. Each sample was aliquoted into individual containers and blind-labeled. A total of 280 participants with diverse educational and professional backgrounds aged 20 years and older were recruited from three sites. Sixty-six males and 74 females tested Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Configuration 1 (including AMP 500, MET 500, MOP 300, COC 150); 72 male and 68 females tested Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Configuration 2 (including AMP 1000, MET 1000, MOP 2000 (OPI), COC 300). Each participant was provided one package insert, one blind labeled test solution, and one test device. The results are summarized below:
| Lay-User Study Results for Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Configuration 1 (including AMP 500, | ||
|---|---|---|
| MET 500, MOP 300, COC 150): |
| Assay | Results | Concentration | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -100% cutoff | -75% cutoff | -50% cutoff | -25% cutoff | +25% cutoff | +50% cutoff | +75% cutoff | ||
| AMP 500 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| BAR 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| BZO 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| BUP 10 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 90% | 100% | 100% | |
| COC 150 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| EDDP 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| MDMA 500 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| MET 500 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| MOP 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| MTD 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| OXY 100 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| PCP 25 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| PPX 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| TCA 1000 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | તે તે જેની જેવી સવલતો પ્રાપ્ય થયેલી છે. આ ગામનાં લોકોનો મુખ્ય વ્યવસાય ખેતી, ખેતમજૂરી તેમ જ પશુપાલન છે. આ ગામમાં પ્રાથમિક શાળા, પંચાયતઘર, આંગણવાડી તેમ જ દૂધની ડેરી જેવી સવલતો | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| THC 50 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | તે તે જેન્જી જેવી સવલતો પ્રાપ્ય થયેલી છે. આ ગામના લોકોનો મુખ્ય વ્યવસાય ખેતી, ખેતમજૂરી તેમ જ પશુપાલન છે. આ ગામમાં પ્રાથમિક શાળા, પંચાયતઘર, આંગણવાડી તેમ જ દૂધની ડેરી જેવી સવલત | 100% | 100% |
{36}------------------------------------------------
{37}------------------------------------------------
Lay-User Study Results for Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Configuration 2 (AMP 1000, MET 1000, MOP 2000 (OPI), COC 300):
| Assay | Results | Concentration | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -100%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -25%cutoff | +25%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +75%cutoff | ||
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| AMP 1000 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| BAR 300 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| BZO 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| BUP 10 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| COC 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| EDDP 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| MDMA 500 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| MET 1000 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| OPI 2000 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| MTD 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| OXY 100 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| PCP 25 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| PPX 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| TCA 1000 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | તે તે જેન્જી જેવી સવલતો પ્રાપ્ય થયેલી છે. આ ગામના લોકોનો મુખ્ય વ્યવસાય ખેતી, ખેતમજૂરી તેમ જ પશુપાલન છે. આ ગામના લોકોનો મુખ્ય વ્યવસાય ખેતી, ખેતમજૂરી તેમ જ પશુપાલન છે. આ ગામના | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| THC 50 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | તે જેન્જી જેવી સવલતો પ્રાપ્ય થયેલી છે. આ ગામનાં લોકોનો મુખ્ય વ્યવસાય ખેતી, ખેતમજૂરી તેમ જ પશુપાલન છે. આ ગામમાં પ્રાથમિક શાળા, પંચાયતઘર, આંગણવાડી તેમ જ દૂધની ડેરી જેવી સવલતો | 100% | 100% |
{38}------------------------------------------------
{39}------------------------------------------------
Participants were given surveys on the ease of understanding the instruction for use. All participants indicated that the device instruction is easy to understand and follow. A Flesch-Kincaid reading analysis was performed on each package insert and the scores revealed a reading Grade Level of 7.
Clinical Studies:
Not applicable.
12. Conclusion
Based on the test principle and performance characteristics of the device including precision, cut-off, interference, specificity, method comparison and lay-user studies of the devices, it's concluded that Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup and Wisdiag Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Rx are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
§ 862.3100 Amphetamine test system.
(a)
Identification. An amphetamine test system is a device intended to measure amphetamine, a central nervous system stimulating drug, in plasma and urine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of amphetamine use or overdose and in monitoring levels of amphetamine to ensure appropriate therapy.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). An amphetamine test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (e.g., programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).