(67 days)
Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cannabinoids (THC 50) | 50 ng/mL |
Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup offers any combinations from 2 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only,
The tests may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup are immunochromatographic assays that use a lateral flow system for the qualitative detection of Amphetamine, Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine,Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in human urine. Each T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup device consists of a test cup and a package insert. Each test cup is sealed with two sachets of desiccant in an aluminum pouch.
This document is a 510(k) Summary for the Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup, a rapid diagnostic device for detecting various drugs of abuse in urine. It describes the device's performance characteristics and a "lay-user study" that can be interpreted as a clinical study for a consumer-facing device.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study data based on the provided text, framed to address your questions for an AI/ML device where applicable (though this device is an in-vitro diagnostic, not an AI/ML system):
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup
Since this is an in-vitro diagnostic device and not an AI/ML system, the "acceptance criteria" are typically defined by precision, specificity, linearity (if applicable), stability, and method comparison studies against a gold standard (LC/MS or GC/MS). The study described for the "lay-user" simulates a real-world use case for intended over-the-counter (OTC) use and provides data on how lay users interpret the results around the device's cut-off.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document doesn't explicitly state "acceptance criteria" in a pass/fail form for the lay-user study. Instead, it presents the results as percentages of correct results at different concentrations relative to the cutoff. For in-vitro diagnostics like this, the implicit acceptance criteria for performance usually revolve around high agreement with confirmed analytical methods (LC/MS or GC/MS), particularly around the cutoff concentrations, and demonstrating usability for the intended user (lay-user in this case).
The performance data for the "lay-user study" is provided for various drugs at different concentrations relative to the cutoff. A "correct result" implies agreement with the LC/MS or GC/MS ground truth.
| Drug (Cut-off) | Concentration | Negative Results | Positive Results | Total Samples | Percentage of Correct Results (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP 500 | -100% cutoff | 20 | 0 | 20 | 100% |
| -75% cutoff | 20 | 0 | 20 | 100% | |
| -50% cutoff | 20 | 0 | 20 | 100% | |
| -25% cutoff | 18 | 2 | 20 | 90% | |
| +25% cutoff | 2 | 18 | 20 | 90% | |
| +50% cutoff | 0 | 20 | 20 | 100% | |
| +75% cutoff | 0 | 20 | 20 | 100% | |
| BAR 300 | -100% cutoff | 20 | 0 | 20 | 100% |
| -75% cutoff | 20 | 0 | 20 | 100% | |
| -50% cutoff | 20 | 0 | 20 | 100% | |
| -25% cutoff | 18 | 2 | 20 | 90% | |
| +25% cutoff | 2 | 18 | 20 | 90% | |
| +50% cutoff | 0 | 20 | 20 | 100% | |
| +75% cutoff | 0 | 20 | 20 | 100% | |
| ... (similarly for all drugs/cutoffs listed in the "Lay-User Study Results" tables) |
The percentage of correct results at concentrations -100%, -75%, -50%, +50%, +75% demonstrated 100% accuracy in the lay-user study for most drugs. Performance around the cutoff (at +/- 25% of cutoff) showed some misclassifications, typically around 85-95% accuracy.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The primary test set for the device's performance is referred to as "Precision studies," "Comparison Studies," and "Lay-user study."
- Precision Studies: For each drug and each concentration (-100% cutoff, -75% cutoff, -50% cutoff, -25% cutoff, +25% cutoff, +50% cutoff, +75% cutoff, and +100% cutoff), tests were performed two runs per day for 25 days. This means a total of 50 tests per concentration per lot. With 3 lots, this is 150 tests per concentration level per drug. The total number of concentrations varied per drug, but on average there are roughly 8 concentrations, so 1200 individual tests per drug type.
- Comparison Studies (In-House): 80 unaltered urine samples (40 negative and 40 positive) were used. The provenance of this data (e.g., country of origin) is not explicitly stated but implied to be from an internal study ("performed in-house"). The samples were retrospective as they were prepared with spiked drug concentrations and used as "unaltered urine samples."
- Lay-User Study:
- Configuration 1 (AMP 500, MET 500, MOP 300, COC 150): 89 males and 51 females participated, totaling 140 participants.
- Configuration 2 (AMP 1000, MET 1000, MOP 2000 (OPI), COC 300): 84 males and 56 females participated, totaling 140 participants.
- Each participant was given 1 blind labeled sample. For each drug, sample concentrations were -100%, +/-75%, +/-25% of the cutoff. Given there are 7 concentrations listed for each drug in the lay-user study tables, and a total of 20 samples per concentration level, this indicates 140 samples per drug (7 concentrations x 20 samples/concentration).
- Data provenance: "Urine samples were prepared... by spiking drug(s) into drug free-pooled urine specimens." This indicates the samples were synthetic/controlled (spiked), not necessarily from real patients. The study was likely conducted in China, given the manufacturer's location (Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co., Ltd.). The study is prospective in the sense that participants were recruited to read the tests.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
The ground truth for all studies (Precision, Comparison, and Lay-User) was established using LC/MS or GC/MS (Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry or Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry). These are highly accurate and widely accepted analytical methods for chemical substance identification and quantification, considered the "gold standard" for drug testing. No human experts are explicitly mentioned as establishing the initial ground truth for the drug concentrations, as this is laboratory methodologically determined.
For the Comparison Studies (In-House), "three operators" ran the samples. Their qualifications are not specified beyond being "operators," but they would be trained lab personnel capable of correctly performing the tests and interpreting the results.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Precision Studies: No explicit adjudication method is mentioned for individual readings within daily runs. The overall results are summarized by tallying positive/negative results across all runs and lots.
- Comparison Studies (In-House): "Operators ran 80 (40 negative and 40 positive) unaltered urine samples." The results were then compared to LC/MS or GC/MS. The tables show results for Viewer A, Viewer B, and Viewer C, implying three independent readers/operators performed and reported the results. Discordant results are individually listed for each viewer against the LC/MS result, indicating that each viewer's interpretation was recorded, and there was no internal adjudication between the viewers before comparison to the ground truth.
- Lay-User Study: "Each participant was provided with... 1 blind labeled sample and a device." This suggests no formal adjudication among lay-users. Each participant's reading was taken as their individual result and then compared against the LC/MS or GC/MS ground truth.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, and its effect size
No, a traditional MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done in the context of human readers improving with AI vs. without AI assistance. This device is an in-vitro diagnostic, not an AI-assisted diagnostic.
However, the "Comparison Studies" with three "Viewers" (human operators) against the LC/MS/GC/MS ground truth, and the "Lay-User Study" where multiple lay participants interpreted the results, do resemble aspects of MRMC studies in that they evaluate multiple readers (operators/lay users) across multiple cases (samples). The "effect size" here would be the agreement of the device, as interpreted by human readers, with the gold standard. The tables show detailed agreement and disagreement for various drugs and concentrations. For example, in the "Comparison Studies" for AMP 500, Viewer A had 2 false positives near cutoff negative and 30 true positives near cutoff positive, compared to LC/MS.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This question is not applicable as the device is not an algorithm or AI. It is a rapid diagnostic test that produces a visual result that must be interpreted by a human user. Its performance is inherently tied to human interpretation.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The type of ground truth used for all performance evaluations (precision studies, in-house comparison studies, and lay-user studies) was confirmed analytical results from LC/MS or GC/MS (Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry or Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry). This is a highly objective and quantitative chemical analysis, serving as the definitive measurement of drug concentration in the urine samples.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This question is not applicable. This is an in-vitro diagnostic device (a chemical test) and does not involve AI/ML requiring a training set in the conventional sense. The "training" of the device is through its chemical formulation and manufacturing process, optimized through R&D, rather than data-driven machine learning.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable, as there is no "training set" in the context of AI/ML for this device. The development of the test's performance characteristics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, cutoff levels) would have been established during the research and development phase of the immunochromatographic assay, typically through extensive chemical and biological experimentation to optimize reagent concentrations and reaction conditions.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: a symbol on the left and the FDA name on the right. The symbol on the left is a stylized image of a human figure, while the FDA name on the right is written in blue letters. The words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" are written in a clear, sans-serif font.
July 16, 2019
Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co., Ltd. % Joe Shia, Manager LSI International 504 E Diamond Ave., Suite I Gaithersburg, MD 20877
Re: K182701
Trade/Device Name: Wondfo T-Cup ® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.3100 Regulation Name: Amphetamine test system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NFT, NGL, PTH, NFV, NFY, PTG, NGG, LCM, QBF, QAW, NFW Dated: September 24, 2018 Received: September 27, 2018
Dear Joe Shia:
This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of December 3, 2018.
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.html; good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Kellie B. Kelm, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Devices OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name
Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup
Indications for Use (Describe)
Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 ng/mL |
| Cannabinoids (THC 50) | 50 ng/mL |
Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup offers any combinations from 2 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only,
The tests may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
{3}------------------------------------------------
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
K182701 510(k) SUMMARY
- November 28, 2018 Date 1
- Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co., Ltd. 2 Submitter No. 8 Lizhishan Road, Science City, Luogang District Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China 510641
- 3 Contact Joe Shia
- Person LSI International Inc. 504 East Diamond Ave., Suite F Gaithersburg, MD 20878 Telephone: 240-505-7880 Fax: 301-916-6213 Email: shiajl@yahoo.com
- Device Name Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup 4
- Classification 5 Class II
| Product Code | Regulation Section | Panel |
|---|---|---|
| Target Drug | ||
| NFTAmphetamine (AMP) | 862.3100, Amphetamine Test System | Toxicology |
| NGLBuprenorphine (BUP) | 862.3650, Opiate Test System | Toxicology |
| PTHSecobarbital (BAR) | 862.3150, Barbiturate Test System | Toxicology |
| NFVOxazepam (BZO) | 862.3170, Benzodiazepine Test System | Toxicology |
| NFYCocaine (COC) | 862.3250, Cocaine Test System | Toxicology |
| PTG2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine(EDDP) | 862.3620, Methadone Test System | Toxicology |
| NGGMethamphetamine(MET) | 862.3610, Methamphetamine Test System | Toxicology |
| NGGMethylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 862.3610, Methamphetamine Test System | Toxicology |
| NGLMorphine (MOP/OPI) | 862.3650, Opiate Test System | Toxicology |
{5}------------------------------------------------
| PTGMethadone (MTD) | 862.3620, Methadone Test System | Toxicology |
|---|---|---|
| NGLOxycodone (OXY) | 862.3650, Opiate Test System | Toxicology |
| LCMPhencyclidine (PCP) | Unclassified | Toxicology |
| QBFPropoxyphene (PPX) | 862.3700 Propoxyphene testsystem. | Toxicology |
| QAWNortriptyline (TCA) | 862.3910 Tricyclic antidepressantdrugs test system | Toxicology |
| NFWCannabinoids (THC 50) | 862.3870, Cannabinoids TestSystem | Toxicology |
6 Predicate K122809 Device Advin Biotech Multi-Drug Screen Tests
7. Intended Use
Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup tests are competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative and simultaneous detection of Amphetamine, Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in human urine at the cutoff concentrations of:
| Drug (Identifier) | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 ng/mL |
| Cannabinoids (THC 50) | 50 ng/mL |
{6}------------------------------------------------
Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup offers any combinations from 2 to 15 drugs of abuse tests but only one cutoff concentration under same drug condition will be included per device. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only.
The tests may yield positive results for the prescription drugs Buprenorphine, Nortriptyline, Oxazepam, Secobarbital, Propoxyphene, and Oxycodone when taken at or above prescribed doses. It is not intended to distinguish between prescription use or abuse of these drugs. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result.
The tests provide only preliminary results. To obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method must be used. GC/MS or LC/MS is the recommended confirmatory method.
Device Description 8.
Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup are immunochromatographic assays that use a lateral flow system for the qualitative detection of Amphetamine, Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine,Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in human urine. Each T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup device consists of a test cup and a package insert. Each test cup is sealed with two sachets of desiccant in an aluminum pouch.
| Item | Proposed Device | Predicate(K122809) |
|---|---|---|
| Indication(s) for use | For the qualitative determination of Amphetamine, Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in human urine. | Same (but the number of drugs detected is different) |
| Methodology | Competitive binding, lateral flow immunochromatographic assay based on antigen-antibody reaction | Same |
| Type of Test | Qualitative | Same |
| Specimen Type | Human urine | Same |
| Target Drug andCut Off Values | Target Drug | Same |
| Cutoff (ng/mL) | ||
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 or 500 | |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 | |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 | |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 | |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 or 150 |
Substantial Equivalence Information 9.
{7}------------------------------------------------
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 or 500 | ||
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 | ||
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 or 300 | ||
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 | ||
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 | ||
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 | ||
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 | ||
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 | ||
| Cannabinoids (THC 50) | 50 | ||
| Configurations | Test cup | Same | |
| Intended Use | For over-the-counter use | Prescription Use andover-the-counter use |
10. Test Principle
Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup is a rapid test for the qualitative detection of Amphetamine, Buprenorphine, Secobarbital, Oxazepam, Cocaine, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-
diphenylpyrrolidine,Methamphetamine, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, Morphine, Methadone, Oxycodone, Phencyclidine, Propoxyphene, Nortriptyline and Cannabinoids in urine samples. They are lateral flow chromatographic immunoassay. When urine sample is added to the cup device, urine is absorbed into the test strip and migrates upwards by capillary action. If the concentration of target drug presented in the urine sample is below the cutoff level, the target drug will not saturate the binding sites of its specific monoclonal antibody-coated particles. The antibody-coated particles will then be captured by immobilized drug-conjugate and a visible colored band will be formed on the test line region. If the concentration of target is beyond the cutoff level, the target drug will saturate the binding sites of its specific monoclonal antibody-particles, thus the antibody-coated particles will not be captured by immobilized drug-conjugate hence no colored band will be formed on the test line region.
A band should be formed on the control line region regardless of the presence of target drug or metabolite in the sample to indicate that the tests have been performed properly.
11. Performance Characteristics
-
- Analytical Performance
- a. Precision
Precision studies were carried out for samples with concentrations of -100%cut off, -75%cut off, -50%cut off, -25%cut off, +25%cut off, +50%cut off, +75%cut off and +100%cut off. For each concentration, tests were performed two runs per day for 25 days. The results obtained are summarized in the following table.
{8}------------------------------------------------
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.68 | 17.69 | 14.89 | 12.81 | 10.69 | 8.29 | 5.27 | 2.58 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 9-/41+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 9-/41+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup PCP 25
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 50.74 | 43.64 | 36.98 | 30.85 | 24.43 | 18.49 | 12.29 | 6.63 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 7-/43+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 6-/44+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 7-/43+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup THC 50
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 99.50 | 88.57 | 75.41 | 62.39 | 50.04 | 38.04 | 25.70 | 12.18 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 11-/39+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup OXY 100
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 198.93 | 178.79 | 149.47 | 122.29 | 103.53 | 75.69 | 48.78 | 24.68 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 9-/41+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 9-/41+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 9-/41+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup BAR 300
| حمد التعليق التقليمي التي التي تعلق التي التي تعلق التي التي التي تقييم التي التي التي تقييم التي التي التي تعلق التي التي تقييم التي تعلق التي تعلق التقييم التي التي تعلق ا | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | 25%-6JI | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
{9}------------------------------------------------
| LC/MS(ng/mL) | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 599.00 | 525.62 | 455.65 | 374.74 | 297.26 | 217.7 | 142.50 | 74.48 | 0 | |
| Lot Number | |||||||||
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 8-/42+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 8-/42+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 8-/42+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup BZO 300
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| 602.91 | 516.94 | 448.36 | 378.24 | 296.80 | 216.82 | 149.66 | 73.34 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 7-/43+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 7-/43+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 8-/42+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup EDDP 300
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 597.99 | 537.04 | 454.10 | 376.30 | 296.48 | 231.98 | 152.78 | 71.21 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 9-/41+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 8-/42+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 9-/41+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup MTD 300
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 601.73 | 533.12 | 444.38 | 377.94 | 300.53 | 221.54 | 158.88 | 89.27 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 9-/41+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 9-/41+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 8-/42+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup MOP 300
{10}------------------------------------------------
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 603.15 | 514.08 | 444.29 | 366.05 | 297.98 | 237.05 | 158.56 | 87.33 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 11-/39+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup PPX 300
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 602.35 | 510.96 | 445.25 | 373.09 | 301.81 | 238.40 | 151.24 | 77.94 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 11-/39+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 11-/39+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup COC 150
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC/MS(ng/mL) | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| 298.12 | 265.57 | 228.13 | 185.01 | 149.94 | 111.61 | 73.28 | 35.91 | 0 | |
| Lot Number | |||||||||
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 11-/39+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup MDMA 500
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1005.82 | 874.87 | 746.39 | 620.36 | 496.21 | 377.55 | 245.14 | 120.41 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 11-/39+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
{11}------------------------------------------------
| Concentration byLC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994.55 | 1772.46 | 1489.61 | 1244.94 | 1029.95 | 764.86 | 493.08 | 283.95 | 0 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup AMP 500
| Concentrationby GC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lot I | 998.23 | 880.545 | 750.15 | 630.77 | 500.18 | 372.34 | 256.24 | 125.78 | |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 11-/39+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup MET 500
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 1006.21 | 862.45 | 744.97 | 620.39 | 497.11 | 374.32 | 246.02 | 123.98 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 9-/41+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 9-/41+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup OPI 2000
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 4008.48 | 3474.19 | 2990.67 | 2429.13 | 1971.46 | 1514.16 | 1051.16 | 494.48 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
{12}------------------------------------------------
| Concentration by | +100%cutoff | +75%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +25%cutoff | Cutoff | -25%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -100%cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS(ng/mL)Lot Number | 599.44 | 528.54 | 450.89 | 370.66 | 299.9 | 224.66 | 149.77 | 78.09 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 11-/39+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 10-/40+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup AMP 1000
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cut-off | |
| (ng/mL) | 1978.82 | 1746.3 | 1508.6 | 1260.5 | 1026.56 | 758.64 | 505.69 | 258.23 | 0 |
| Lot Number | |||||||||
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 8-/42+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 8-/42+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 7-/43+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup MET 1000
| Concentration by | +100% | +75% | +50% | +25% | Cutoff | -25% | -50% | -75% | -100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC/MS | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | cutoff | ||
| (ng/mL)Lot Number | 1978.55 | 1740.9 | 1506.5 | 1234.8 | 1037.23 | 751.60 | 491.85 | 245.71 | 0 |
| Lot I | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 7-/43+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot II | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 7-/43+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
| Lot III | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 0-/50+ | 8-/42+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ | 50-/0+ |
The following cutoff values are verified:
| Target Drug | Cut-off level |
|---|---|
| Amphetamine (AMP) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
| Buprenorphine (BUP) | 10 ng/mL |
| Secobarbital (BAR) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxazepam (BZO) | 300 ng/mL |
| Cocaine (COC) | 300 ng/mL or 150 ng/mL |
| 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) | 300 ng/mL |
| Methamphetamine (MET) | 1000 ng/mL or 500 ng/mL |
{13}------------------------------------------------
| Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) | 500 ng/mL |
|---|---|
| Morphine (MOP 300/OPI 2000) | 2000 ng/mL or 300 ng/mL |
| Methadone (MTD) | 300 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone (OXY) | 100 ng/mL |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene (PPX) | 300 ng/mL |
| Nortriptyline (TCA) | 1000 ng/mL |
| Cannabinoids (THC 50) | 50 ng/mL |
b. Linearity
Not applicable
c. Stability
The devices are stable at 4-30℃ for 24 months based on real-time stability studies.
- d. Interference
Potential interfering substances were added to drug-free urine sample and samples with target drugs of -25% cutoff and +25% cutoff level.
Compounds that show no interference at a concentration of 100μ.g/mL are summarized in the following table.
| Acetaminophen | Acetophenetidin | Acetylsalicylic Acid |
|---|---|---|
| Acyclovir | Amiodarone Hydrochloride | Apomorphine |
| Afrin | Albumin | Amlodipine Mesylate |
| Aminophylline | Amoxicillin | Aripiprazole |
| Aminopyrine | Ampicillin | Aspartame |
| Benzilic Acid | Atropine | Atomoxetine |
| Benzoic Acid | Carbamazepine | Atorvastatin Calcium |
| Bilirubin | Cefradine | Chloramphenicol |
| Bupropion | Cephalexin | Chlorothiazide |
| Captopril | Chloral Hydrate | Chloroquine |
| Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride | Clonidine | Cholesterol |
| Citalopram | Clopidogrel Hydrogen Sulphate | (-) Cotinine |
| Clarithromycin | Clozapine | chlorpheniramine |
| Deoxy- corticosterone | D,L-Tyrosine | D,L-Octopamine |
| Dextromethorphan | Digoxin | D,L-Propranolol |
| Diclofenac | Diphenhydramine | D-Norpropoxy- phene |
| Diflunisal | Dirithromycin | Domperidone |
| D-Pseudo- ephedrine | Ecgonine Methyl Ester | Doxylamine |
| Duloxetine | Effexor | Epinephrine Hydrochloride |
| Dicyclomine | Enalapril Maleate | Erythromycin |
| β -Estradiol | Fentanyl Citrate | Esomeprazole Magnesium |
| Ethanol | Fluoxetine Hydrochloride | Furosemide |
| Fenofibrate | Fluvoxamine | Gabapentin |
| Fenoprofen | Glucose | Gentisic Acid |
| Glibenclamide | Haloperidol | 3-Hydroxy- tyramine |
| Gliclazide | Hemoglobin | Isosorbide Dinitrate |
| Glipizide | Ketamine | Isoxsuprine |
| Ibuprofen | Kratom powder | Lamotrigine |
| Ketoconazole | Labetalol | Levofloxacin Hydrochloride |
| Ketoprofen | Liverite | Levonorgestrel |
| Lidocaine Hydrochloride | Loperamide | Levothyroxine Sodium |
| Lisinopril | Loratadine | Minocycline |
| Lithium Carbonate | Naproxen | Nalidixic Acid |
| Metoprolol Tartrate | Mifepristone | Niacinamide |
| Magnesium | Mirtazapine | Nifedipine |
| Meperidine | Montelukast Sodium | Nikethamide |
| Meprobamate | Phenelzine | Sulfamethazine |
| Mosapride Citrate | Pioglitazone Hydrochloride | Sulindac |
| Maprotiline | Piracetam | Tetrahydrocortisone 3 -acetate |
| Nimodipine | Pravastatin Sodium | Tetrahydrocortisone 3-(β-D- |
| glucuronide) | ||
| Norethindrone | Prednisone | Tetrahydrozoline |
| N-Acetylprocain-amide | Propylthiouracil | Tetracycline |
| O-Hydroxyhippu-ric Acid | Promethazine | Thiamine |
| Olanzapine | Quetiapine Fumarate | Thioridazine |
| Omeprazole | Quinine | Topiramate |
| Oxalic Acid | Ranitidine | Tramadol Hydrochloride |
| Oxolinic Acid | Rifampicin | Trazodone Hydrochloride |
| Oxymetazoline | Risperidone | Triamterene |
| Ondansetran | Salicylic Acid | Trifluoperazine |
| Paliperidone | Serotonin | Trimethoprim |
| Pantoprazole | Sertraline Hydrochloride | Uric Acid |
| Papaverine | Sildenafil Citrate | Valproate |
| Paroxetine Hydrochloride | Simvastatin | Verapamil |
| Penfluridol | Sodium Valproate | Vitamin B2 |
| PenicillinV Potassium | Spironolactone | Vitamin C |
{14}------------------------------------------------
e. Specificity
{15}------------------------------------------------
To test the specificity, drug metabolites and other components that are likely to cross-react in urine samples were spiked into drug-free urine. These urine samples were tested using three lots of each device.
| Compounds that produced positive results are listed below. | ||
|---|---|---|
| ------------------------------------------------------------ | -- | -- |
| BUP 10 (Buprenorphine,Cutoff=10 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Buprenorphine -3-D-Glucuronide | 15 | 66.7% |
| Norbuprenorphine | 20 | 50% |
| Norbuprenorphine-3-D-Glucuronide | 200 | 5% |
| Morphine | >100,000 | -- |
| Oxymorphone | >100,000 | -- |
| Hydromorphone | >100,000 | -- |
| PCP (Phencyclidine)(Phencyclidine,Cutoff=25 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| 4-Hydroxyphencyclidine | 12500 | 0.2% |
| THC 50(11-nor-Δ9-THC-9-COOH,Cutoff=50 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| 11-nor-Δ8-THC 50-9-COOH | 30 | 167% |
| (-)-11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ 9-THC 50 | 50 | 100% |
| 11-nor-Δ9-THC 50-carboxy glucuronide | 100 | 50% |
| 11-hydroxy-Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol | 5000 | 1% |
| Δ8- Tetrahydrocannabinol | 1300 | 4% |
| Δ9- Tetrahydrocannabinol | 5000 | 1% |
| Cannabinol | 20000 | 0.25% |
| Cannabidiol | 100000 | 0.05% |
| OXY 100(Oxycodone, Cutoff=100 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Dihydrocodeine | 20000 | 0.5% |
| Hydrocodone | 10000 | 1% |
| Oxymorphone | 1000 | 10% |
| Codeine | 100000 | 0.1% |
| Hydromorphone | 32000 | 0.3125% |
| Morphine | >100,000 | -- |
| Acetylmorphine | >100,000 | -- |
{16}------------------------------------------------
| Buprenorphine | >100,000 | -- |
|---|---|---|
| Ethylmorphine | >100,000 | -- |
| Thebaine | >100,000 | -- |
| COC 150(Benzoylecgonine, Cutoff=150 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Cocaine | 375 | 40% |
| Cocaethylene | 6250 | 2.4% |
| Ecgonine | 16000 | <1% |
| Ecgonine methyl ester | >100,000 | -- |
| Norcocaine | >100,000 | -- |
| BAR 300(Secobarbital, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Amobarbital | 10000 | 3% |
| Alphenol | 150 | 200% |
| Aprobarbital | 200 | 150% |
| Butabarbital | 75 | 400% |
| Butathal | 100 | 300% |
| Butalbital | 2500 | 12% |
| Cyclopentobarbital | 600 | 50% |
| Pentobarbital | 2500 | 12% |
| Phenobarbital | 10000 | 3% |
| BZO 300(Oxazepam, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Alprazolam | 200 | 150% |
| a-Hydroxyalprazolam | 1500 | 20% |
| Bromazepam | 500 | 60% |
| Chlordiazepoxide | 1500 | 20% |
| Clobazam | 100 | 300% |
| Clonazepam | 800 | 37.5% |
| Clorazepate dipotassium | 200 | 150% |
| Delorazepam | 1500 | 20% |
| Desalkylflurazepam | 400 | 75% |
| Diazepam | 200 | 150% |
| Estazolam | 1000 | 30% |
| Flunitrazepam | 2500 | 12% |
| Midazolam | 12500 | 2.4% |
{17}------------------------------------------------
| Nitrazepam | 4000 | 7.5% |
|---|---|---|
| Norchlordiazepoxide | 200 | 150% |
| Nordiazepam | 500 | 60% |
| Temazepam | 250 | 120% |
| Triazolam | 1200 | 25% |
| Demoxepam | 2000 | 15% |
| Flurazepam | 500 | 60% |
| D,L-Lorazepam | 1500 | 20% |
| EDDP 300(2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, Cutoff = 300 ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Methadone | 300000 | 0.1% |
| EMDP | 300000 | 0.1% |
| Doxylamine | >100,000 | -- |
| Disopyramide | >100,000 | -- |
| LAAM (Levo-alpha-acetylmethadol) HCl | >100,000 | -- |
| Alpha Methadol | >100,000 | -- |
| MTD 300(Methadone, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Doxylamine | 50000 | 0.6% |
| EDDP | >100,000 | -- |
| EMDP | >100,000 | -- |
| LAAM | >100,000 | -- |
| Alpha Methadol | >100,000 | -- |
| MOP 300(Morphine, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Normorphine | 300 | 100% |
| s-Monoacetylmorphine | 300 | 100% |
| Codeine | 300 | 100% |
| Ethyl Morphine | 100 | 300% |
| Heroin | 300 | 100% |
| Hydrocodone | 5000 | 6% |
| Hydromorphone | 1000 | 30% |
| Morphinie-3-β-d-glucuronide | 1000 | 30% |
| Oxycodone | >100000 | -- |
| Oxymorphone | 100000 | 0.3% |
| Thebaine | 3000 | 10% |
{18}------------------------------------------------
| Levorphanol | 10000 | 3% |
|---|---|---|
| 6-Monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM) | 150 | 200% |
| Norcodeine | 6250 | 4.8% |
| Procaine | 150000 | 0.2% |
| PPX 300(Propoxyphene, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| d-Norpropoxyphene | 300 | 100% |
| MDMA 500(3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine HCl,Cutoff=500ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine HCl (MDA) | 3000 | 17% |
| 3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA) | 300 | 167% |
| d-methamphetamine | >100,000 | -- |
| d-amphetamine | >100,000 | -- |
| l-methamphetamine | 50000 | 1% |
| l-amphetamine | >100,000 | -- |
| AMP 500(Amphetamine, Cutoff=500ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Amphetamine | 25000 | 2% |
| dl- Amphetamine | 1500 | 33% |
| ( +/- ) 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) | 2500 | 20% |
| Phentermine | 1500 | 33% |
| Hydroxyamphetamine | 8000 | 6.25% |
| d-Methamphetamine | >100,000 | -- |
| l-Methamphetamine | >100,000 | -- |
| (+/- ) 3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine(MDE) | >100,000 | -- |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA) | >100,000 | -- |
| Ephedrine | >100,000 | -- |
| β-Phenylethylamine | 100000 | 0.5% |
| Tyramine | 100000 | 0.5% |
| p-Hydroxynorephedrine | 100000 | 0.5% |
| Phenylpropanolamine | >100,000 | -- |
| (±)Phenylpropanolamine | >100,000 | -- |
| p-Hydroxyamphetamine | 100000 | 0.5% |
{19}------------------------------------------------
| d/l-Norephedrine | 100000 | 0.5% |
|---|---|---|
| Benzphetamine | >100,000 | -- |
| l-Ephedrine | >100,000 | -- |
| l-Epinephrine | >100,000 | -- |
| d/l-Epinephrine | >100,000 | -- |
| MET 500(D(+)-Methamphetamine, Cutoff=500ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| D-Amphetamine | 25000 | 2% |
| L- Amphetamine | 37500 | 1.3% |
| Chloroquine | 10000 | 5% |
| (+/-)-Ephedrine | 25000 | 2% |
| D/L-Methamphetamine | 500 | 100% |
| L-Methamphetamine | 10000 | 5% |
| (+/-)3,4Methylenedioxy-n-ethylamphetamine(MDEA) | 500 | 100% |
| (+/-)3,4- Methylenedioxyamphetamine(MDA) | 500 | 100% |
| (+/-)3,4- Methylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA) | 2000 | 25% |
| β-Phenylethylamine | 25000 | 2% |
| Trimethobenzamide | 5000 | 10% |
| d/l-Amphetamine | 75000 | 0.7% |
| p-Hydroxymethamphetamine | 15000 | 3.3% |
| Mephentermine | 25000 | 2% |
| (1R,2S)-(-)-Ephedrine | 50000 | 1% |
| 1-Phenylephrine | 100000 | 0.5% |
| (-)-Methamphetamine | 12500 | 4% |
| TCA 1000(Nortriptyline, Cutoff=1000ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Nordoxepine | 1000 | 100% |
| Trimipramine | 3000 | 33.3% |
| Amitriptyline | 1500 | 66.7% |
| Promazine | 1500 | 66.7% |
| Desipramine | 200 | 500% |
| Imipramine | 400 | 250% |
| Clomipramine | 12500 | 8% |
| Doxepine | 2000 | 50% |
| Maprotiline | 2000 | 50% |
{20}------------------------------------------------
| Promethazine | 25000 | 4% |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclobenzaprine | 800 | 125% |
| Norclomipramine | 12500 | 8% |
| COC 300(Benzoylecgonine, Cutoff=300ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Cocaine | 750 | 40% |
| Cocaethylene | 12500 | 2.4% |
| Ecgonine | 32000 | <1% |
| Ecgonine methyl Ester | >100000 | -- |
| Norcocaine | >100,000 | -- |
| AMP 1000(d-Amphetamine, Cutoff=1000ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Amphetamine | 50000 | 2% |
| d1-Amphetamine | 3000 | 33.3% |
| Phentermine | 3000 | 33.3% |
| (+/-) 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine(MDA) | 5000 | 20% |
| Hydroxyamphetamine | >100000 | -- |
| d-Methamphetamine | >100000 | -- |
| l-Methamphetamine | >100000 | -- |
| Ephedrine | >100000 | -- |
| (+/-)3,4- Methylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA) | 100000 | 1% |
| β-Phenylethylamine | 100000 | 1% |
| Tyramine | 100000 | 1% |
| p-Hydroxynorephedrine | 100000 | 1% |
| Phenylpropanolamine | >100000 | -- |
| (±)Phenylpropanolamine | >100000 | -- |
| p-Hydroxyamphetamine | 100000 | 1% |
| d/l-Norephedrine | 100000 | 1% |
| Benzphetamine | >100000 | -- |
| l-Ephedrine | >100000 | -- |
| l-Epinephrine | >100000 | -- |
| d/l-Epinephrine | >100000 | -- |
| Hydroxyamphetamine | 8000 | 12.5% |
{21}------------------------------------------------
| MET 1000(D(+)-Methamphetamine, Cutoff=1000ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxy-n-ethylamphetamine(MDEA) | 1000 | 100% |
| D/L-Methamphetamine | 1000 | 100% |
| p-Hydroxymethamphetamine | 30000 | 3.3% |
| D-Amphetamine | >100000 | -- |
| L-Amphetamine | 75000 | 1.3% |
| Chloroquine | 50000 | 2% |
| (+/-)-Ephedrine | 50000 | 2% |
| (-)-Methamphetamine | 25000 | 4% |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) | 1000 | 100% |
| (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA) | 4000 | 25% |
| β-Phenylethylamine | 50000 | 2% |
| Trimethobenzamide | 10000 | 10% |
| d,l-Amphetamine | 100000 | 1% |
| Mephetermine | 50000 | 2% |
| (1R,2S)-(-)-Ephedrine | >100000 | -- |
| l-phenylephrine | >100000 | -- |
| L-Methamphetamine | 25000 | 4% |
| OPI 2000(Morphine, Cutoff=2000ng/mL) | Minimum concentrationrequired to obtain apositive result (ng/mL) | % Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| Codeine | 2000 | 100% |
| Ethyl Morphine | 1500 | 133% |
| Hydrocodone | 12500 | 16% |
| Hydromorphone | 3500 | 57% |
| Levorphanol | 75000 | 2.7% |
| 6-Monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM) | 1500 | 133% |
| Morphine 3-β-D-glucuronide | 2000 | 100% |
| Norcodeine | 12500 | 16% |
| Normorphine | 50000 | 4% |
| Oxycodone | 25000 | 8% |
| Oxymorphone | 25000 | 8% |
| Procaine | 150000 | 1.3% |
| Thebaine | 5000 | 40% |
| Heroin | 2000 | 100% |
| s-Monoacetylmorphine | 2000 | 100% |
{22}------------------------------------------------
Effect of Urine Specific Gravity and Urine pH f.
To investigate the effect of urine specific gravity, urine samples with specific gravity from 1.000 to 1.035 were spiked with target drugs at +25% cutoff and -25% cutoff levels. Three viewers tested each sample using test devices from three different lots. The results were all positive for samples at +25% cutoff and all negative for samples at -25% cutoff, indicating that urine specific gravity between 1.000 and 1.035 has no effect on the accuracy and precision of the test device. To investigate the effect of urine pH, urine samples with pH value from 4 to 9 were spiked with target drugs at +25% cutoff and -25% cutoff levels. Three viewers tested each sample using test devices from three different lots. The results were all positive for samples at +25% cutoff and all negative for samples at -25% cutoff, indicating that urine pH value between 4.0 and 9.0 has no effect on the accuracy and precision of the test device.
-
- Comparison Studies
The method comparison studies for Wondfo T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test cup were performed inhouse with three operators.
- Comparison Studies
Operators ran 80 (40 negative and 40 positive) unaltered urine samples. The samples were blind labeled and compared to LC/MS or GC/MS results. The results are presented in the table below:
For T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup:
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byGC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byGC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byGC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby GC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
AMP 500
Discordant Results for AMP 500:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 10062 | 479.507 | + |
| Viewer B | 10062 | 479.507 | + |
| Viewer C | 10062 | 479.507 | + |
| Viewer A | 10021 | 480.687 | + |
| Viewer C | 10021 | 480.687 | + |
{23}------------------------------------------------
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 9 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 9 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 9 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for BUP 10:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 10140 | 10.039 | - |
| Viewer B | 10140 | 10.039 | - |
| Viewer C | 10140 | 10.039 | - |
| Viewer A | 10099 | 8.071 | + |
| Viewer B | 10099 | 8.071 | + |
| Viewer C | 10099 | 8.071 | + |
| Viewer A | 10090 | 8.226 | + |
| Viewer B | 10090 | 8.226 | + |
| Viewer C | 10090 | 8.226 | + |
| Viewer A | 10101 | 9.000 | + |
| Viewer B | 10101 | 9.000 | + |
| Viewer C | 10101 | 9.000 | + |
BAR 300
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 11 |
| Negative | 10 | 19 | 11 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 11 |
| Negative | 10 | 19 | 11 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 11 |
| Negative | 10 | 19 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
{24}------------------------------------------------
Discordant Results for BAR 300:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 100177 | 306.032 | - |
| Viewer B | 100177 | 306.032 | - |
| Viewer C | 100177 | 306.032 | - |
BZO 300
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 29 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 13 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 29 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 13 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 29 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 13 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for BZO 300:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 10279 | 289.534 | + |
| Viewer B | 10279 | 289.534 | + |
| Viewer C | 10279 | 289.534 | + |
| Viewer A | 10293 | 307.387 | - |
| Viewer B | 10293 | 307.387 | - |
| Viewer C | 10293 | 307.387 | - |
| Viewer A | 10310 | 274.237 | + |
| Viewer B | 10310 | 274.237 | + |
| Viewer C | 10310 | 274.237 | + |
COC 150
| Wondfo T-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byGC/MS(less than -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byGC/MS(Between -50% and theCutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byGC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | HighPositive byGC/MS(greaterthan +50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 9 |
{25}------------------------------------------------
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 9 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 9 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for COC 150:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 11397 | 146.311 | + |
| Viewer C | 11397 | 146.311 | + |
| Viewer A | 11414 | 145.437 | + |
| Viewer B | 11414 | 145.437 | + |
| Viewer C | 11414 | 145.437 | + |
EDDP 300
| Wondfo T-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50% and theCutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 32 | 8 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 32 | 8 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 32 | 8 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for EDDP 300:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 10359 | 246.613 | + |
| Viewer B | 10359 | 246.613 | + |
| Viewer C | 10359 | 246.613 | + |
| MET 500 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byGC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byGC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byGC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby GC/MS(greater than+50%) |
{26}------------------------------------------------
| Viewer A | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 20 | |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | ||||||
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 14 | 0 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | ||||||
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 20 | |
| Negative | 10 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MET 500:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer B | 11491 | 378.483 | + |
| Viewer C | 11491 | 378.483 | + |
| Viewer A | 11452 | 384.376 | + |
| Viewer C | 11452 | 384.376 | + |
MDMA 500
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MDMA 500:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 10477 | 409.82 | + |
| Viewer B | 10477 | 409.82 | + |
| Viewer C | 10477 | 409.82 | + |
| Viewer A | 10456 | 417.972 | + |
| Viewer B | 10456 | 417.972 | + |
| Viewer C | 10456 | 417.972 | + |
{27}------------------------------------------------
| WondfoT-Cup® | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug-Free | LowNegative byGC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byGC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byGC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby GC/MS(greater than+50%) | ||
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 12 | 2 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 12 | 2 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 12 | 2 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MOP 300:
| Viewer | Sample Number | GC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 10541 | 303.693 | - |
| Viewer B | 10541 | 303.693 | - |
| Viewer C | 10541 | 303.693 | - |
| Viewer A | 10514 | 307.303 | - |
| Viewer B | 10514 | 307.303 | - |
| Viewer C | 10514 | 307.303 | - |
MTD 300
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 12 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 12 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 12 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MTD 300:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 10566 | 282.733 | + |
| Viewer B | 10566 | 282.733 | + |
| Viewer C | 10566 | 282.733 | + |
{28}------------------------------------------------
| Viewer A | 10635 | 285.038 | + |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer B | 10635 | 285.038 | + |
| Viewer C | 10635 | 285.038 | + |
| Viewer A | 10634 | 309.555 | - |
| Viewer B | 10634 | 309.555 | - |
| Viewer C | 10634 | 309.555 | - |
OXY 100
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 10 |
| Viewer A Negative | 10 | 18 | 12 | 1 | 0 |
| Viewer B Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 10 |
| Viewer B Negative | 10 | 18 | 12 | 1 | 0 |
| Viewer C Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 10 |
| Viewer C Negative | 10 | 18 | 12 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for OXY 100:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 10688 | 113.792 | - |
| Viewer B | 10688 | 113.792 | - |
| Viewer C | 10688 | 113.792 | - |
PCP 25
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 20 | 9 | 2 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 20 | 9 | 2 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 20 | 9 | 2 | 0 |
{29}------------------------------------------------
Discordant Results for PCP 25:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 10797 | 20.203 | + |
| Viewer B | 10797 | 20.203 | + |
| Viewer C | 10797 | 20.203 | + |
| Viewer A | 10736 | 25.049 | - |
| Viewer B | 10736 | 25.049 | - |
| Viewer C | 10736 | 25.049 | - |
| Viewer A | 10725 | 25.105 | - |
| Viewer B | 10725 | 25.105 | - |
| Viewer C | 10725 | 25.105 | - |
PPX 300
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 8 |
| Negative | 10 | 17 | 11 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 8 |
| Negative | 10 | 17 | 11 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 8 |
| Negative | 10 | 17 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for PPX 300:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 10802 | 241.706 | + |
| Viewer B | 10802 | 241.706 | + |
| Viewer C | 10802 | 241.706 | + |
| Viewer A | 10820 | 252.045 | + |
| Viewer B | 10820 | 252.045 | + |
| Viewer C | 10820 | 252.045 | + |
| Viewer A | 10863 | 314.373 | - |
| Viewer B | 10863 | 314.373 | - |
| Viewer C | 10863 | 314.373 | - |
{30}------------------------------------------------
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 29 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 29 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 29 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 0 |
Discordant Results for TCA 1000:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 10917 | 796.893 | + |
| Viewer B | 10917 | 796.893 | + |
| Viewer C | 10917 | 796.893 | + |
| Viewer A | 10951 | 812.065 | + |
| Viewer B | 10951 | 812.065 | + |
| Viewer C | 10951 | 812.065 | + |
| Viewer A | 10893 | 1007.857 | - |
| Viewer B | 10893 | 1007.857 | - |
| Viewer C | 10893 | 1007.857 | - |
THC 50
| WondfoT-Cup® | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | ||
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 28 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 19 | 8 | 2 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 28 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 19 | 8 | 2 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 28 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 19 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
Discordant Results for THC 50:
{31}------------------------------------------------
| Viewer A | 11020 | 40.238 | + |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer B | 11020 | 40.238 | + |
| Viewer C | 11020 | 40.238 | + |
| Viewer A | 11011 | 43.304 | + |
| Viewer B | 11011 | 43.304 | + |
| Viewer C | 11011 | 43.304 | + |
| Viewer A | 10971 | 45.118 | + |
| Viewer B | 10971 | 45.118 | + |
| Viewer C | 10971 | 45.118 | + |
| Viewer A | 11001 | 51.112 | - |
| Viewer B | 11001 | 51.112 | - |
| Viewer C | 11001 | 51.112 | - |
| Viewer A | 10975 | 50.639 | - |
| Viewer B | 10975 | 50.639 | - |
| Viewer C | 10975 | 50.639 | - |
AMP 1000
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 28 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 28 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 2 | 28 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 0 |
Discordant Results for AMP 1000:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result (ng/mL) | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 11077 | 739.221 | + |
| Viewer B | 11077 | 739.221 | + |
| Viewer C | 11077 | 739.221 | + |
| Viewer A | 11092 | 797.646 | + |
| Viewer B | 11092 | 797.646 | + |
| Viewer C | 11092 | 797.646 | + |
| Viewer A | 11057 | 1025.544 | - |
| Viewer B | 11057 | 1025.544 | - |
| Viewer C | 11057 | 1025.544 | - |
{32}------------------------------------------------
| Viewer A | 11112 | 1017.953 | - |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer B | 11112 | 1017.953 | - |
| Viewer C | 11112 | 1017.953 | - |
COC 300
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and+50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 27 | 11 |
| Negative | 10 | 13 | 14 | 2 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 27 | 11 |
| Negative | 10 | 13 | 14 | 2 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 27 | 11 |
| Negative | 10 | 13 | 14 | 2 | 0 |
Discordant Results for COC 300:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 11143 | 283.934 | + |
| Viewer B | 11143 | 283.934 | + |
| Viewer C | 11143 | 283.934 | + |
| Viewer A | 11126 | 292.623 | + |
| Viewer B | 11126 | 292.623 | + |
| Viewer C | 11126 | 292.623 | + |
| Viewer A | 11147 | 293.871 | + |
| Viewer B | 11147 | 293.871 | + |
| Viewer C | 11147 | 293.871 | + |
| Viewer A | 11160 | 309.73 | - |
| Viewer B | 11160 | 309.73 | - |
| Viewer C | 11160 | 309.73 | - |
| Viewer A | 11182 | 320.007 | - |
| Viewer B | 11182 | 320.007 | - |
| Viewer C | 11182 | 320.007 | - |
MET 1000
| WondfoT-Cup® | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ------------------ | -- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
{33}------------------------------------------------
| (Between thecutoff and+50%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 15 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 9 | 2 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 15 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 9 | 2 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 15 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 9 | 2 | 0 |
Discordant Results for MET 1000:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 11216 | 873.409 | + |
| Viewer B | 11216 | 873.409 | + |
| Viewer C | 11216 | 873.409 | + |
| Viewer A | 11250 | 888.241 | + |
| Viewer B | 11250 | 888.241 | + |
| Viewer C | 11250 | 888.241 | + |
| Viewer A | 11213 | 890.705 | + |
| Viewer B | 11213 | 890.705 | + |
| Viewer C | 11213 | 890.705 | + |
| Viewer A | 11215 | 1036.001 | - |
| Viewer B | 11215 | 1036.001 | - |
| Viewer C | 11215 | 1036.001 | - |
| Viewer A | 11240 | 1022.392 | - |
| Viewer B | 11240 | 1022.392 | - |
| Viewer C | 11240 | 1022.392 | - |
OPI 2000
| WondfoQ-Cup | Drug-Free | LowNegative byLC/MS (lessthan -50%) | Near CutoffNegative byLC/MS(Between -50%and the Cutoff) | Near CutoffPositive byLC/MS(Between thecutoff and +50%) | High Positiveby LC/MS(greater than+50%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 9 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer B | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 9 | 1 | 0 | |
| Viewer C | Positive | 0 | 0 | 3 | 30 | 10 |
| Negative | 10 | 18 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
{34}------------------------------------------------
Discordant Results for OPI 2000:
| Viewer | Sample Number | LC/MS Result | T-Cup Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viewer A | 11354 | 1830.086 | + |
| Viewer B | 11354 | 1830.086 | + |
| Viewer C | 11354 | 1830.086 | + |
| Viewer A | 11335 | 1882.994 | + |
| Viewer B | 11335 | 1882.994 | + |
| Viewer C | 11335 | 1882.994 | + |
| Viewer A | 11297 | 1947.150 | + |
| Viewer B | 11297 | 1947.150 | + |
| Viewer C | 11297 | 1947.150 | + |
| Viewer A | 11295 | 2015.745 | - |
| Viewer B | 11295 | 2015.745 | - |
| Viewer C | 11295 | 2015.745 | - |
Lay-user study:
89 males and 51 females tested T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Configuration 1 (including AMP 500, MET 500, MOP 300, COC 150) ; 84 male and 56 females tested T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Configuration 2 (including AMP 1000, MET 1000, MOP 2000 (OPI), COC 300). They had diverse educational and professional backgrounds and their age range from 20 to over 50. Urine samples were prepared at the following concentrations; -100%, +/-75%, +/-25% of the cutoff by spiking drug(s) into drug free-pooled urine specimens. The concentrations of the samples were confirmed by LC/MS or GC/MS. Each sample was aliquoted into individual containers and blindlabeled. Each participant was provided with the package insert, 1 blind labeled sample and a device. The results are summarized below.
| Assay | Results | Concentration | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -100% cutoff | -75% cutoff | -50% cutoff | -25% cutoff | +25% cutoff | +50% cutoff | +75% cutoff | ||
| AMP 500 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 90% | 100% | 100% | |
| BAR 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage of correct results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 90% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| BZO 300 | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 20 | 20 |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 90% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| BUP 10 | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 20 | 20 |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| COC 150 | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 20 |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| EDDP 300 | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| MDMA 500 | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 20 |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| MET 500 | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 20 | 20 |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% | 90% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| MOP 300 | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 20 | 20 |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 90% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| MTD 300 | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 20 | 20 |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% | 85% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| OXY 100 | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 20 |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| PCP 25 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 20 | 20 | |
| PPX 300 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% | 85% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| TCA 1000 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 20 | 20 | |
| THC 50 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% | 90% | 100% | 100% |
Lay-User Study Results for T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Configuration 1 (including AMP 500, MET 500, MOP 300, COC 150):
{35}------------------------------------------------
{36}------------------------------------------------
Lay-User Study Results for T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup Configuration 2 (AMP 1000, MET 1000, MOP 2000 (OPI), COC 300):
| Assay | Results | Concentration | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -100%cutoff | -75%cutoff | -50%cutoff | -25%cutoff | +25%cutoff | +50%cutoff | +75%cutoff | ||
| AMP 1000 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| BAR 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 90% | 100% | 100% | |
| BZO 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 90% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| BUP 10 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 20 | 20 | |
| COC 300 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% | 90% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 20 | 20 | |
| EDDP 300 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 90% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| MDMA 500 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| MET 1000 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| OPI 2000 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 20 | 20 | |
| MTD 300 | Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 90% | 100% | 100% | |
| Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| OXY 100 | Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 20 | 20 |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| PCP 25 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| PPX 300 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 90% | 100% | 100% | |
| TCA 1000 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | |
| THC 50 | Negative | 20 | 20 | 20 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 20 | 20 | |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| Percentage ofcorrect results (%) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% | 90% | 100% | 100% |
{37}------------------------------------------------
{38}------------------------------------------------
Participants were given surveys on the ease of understanding the instruction for use. All participants indicated that the device instruction is easy to understand and follow. A Flesch-Kincaid reading analysis was performed on each package insert and the scores revealed a reading Grade Level of 7.
Clinical Studies:
Not applicable.
12. Conclusion
Based on the test principle and performance characteristics of the device including precision, cut-off, interference, specificity, method comparison and lay-user studies of the devices, it's concluded that T-Cup® Multi-Drug Urine Test Cup are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
§ 862.3100 Amphetamine test system.
(a)
Identification. An amphetamine test system is a device intended to measure amphetamine, a central nervous system stimulating drug, in plasma and urine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of amphetamine use or overdose and in monitoring levels of amphetamine to ensure appropriate therapy.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). An amphetamine test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (e.g., programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).