K Number
K222370
Date Cleared
2023-04-02

(240 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
870.2900
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

SpO2 Extension Cables are intended to be used to connect SpO2 sensors, placed at appropriate sites on the patient to a monitoring device for SpO2 monitoring by health care professional.

Device Description

SpO2 Extension Cables are intended to be used to connect SpO2 sensors, placed at appropriate sites on the patient to a monitoring device for SpO2 monitoring by health care professional.

The SpO2 Extension Cable is the replacements for similar cables manufactured by Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) and other third party after manufacturers for their respective monitors.

The SpO2 Extension Cable is comprised of Plug, Cable/Leadwires and Connector. It's intended to plug into monitoring device and connect with SpO2 sensor, for transmitting signals which generated by SpO2 sensor to monitoring device.

By using the same types of construction and technological characteristics to the compatible patient monitor and SpO2 sensor, the SpO2 Extension Cable can avoid measured data corrupted.

AI/ML Overview

This document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for an SpO2 Extension Cable. It confirms that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device and is subject to general controls. It does not contain information about clinical studies with AI or human readers, or detailed acceptance criteria for an AI-based device.

Therefore, I cannot answer your specific questions related to acceptance criteria, study design for AI evaluation, sample sizes, expert involvement, or ground truth establishment as this information is not present in the provided text for this specific device.

The document primarily focuses on the device's classification, general controls, and non-clinical testing to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device, which is a different type of evaluation than what you typically find for AI/ML-driven medical devices.

Summary of available information (and absence of requested information):

  • 1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: Not explicitly stated as pass/fail criteria from a performance study. The "performance" is demonstrated through compliance with electrical safety, performance, and EMC standards, and biocompatibility, as well as functional compatibility.

    • Acceptance Criteria (Inferred from compliance):
      • Biocompatibility: Meet ISO 10993-5 (Cytotoxicity) and ISO 10993-10 (Sensitization and Irritation).
      • Electrical Safety & Performance: Meet IEC 60601-1, ISO 80601-2-61 (Pulse Oximeter equipment), and ANSI AAMI EC53 (ECG trunk cables and patient leadwires).
      • EMC: Meet IEC 60601-1-2.
      • Compatibility: No measured data corruption during communication between SpO2 sensors and host monitors.
    • Reported Device Performance (Inferred from conclusions):
      • "The test results demonstrated that the proposed device complies with the following standards..." (listed above).
      • "SpO2 Extension Cable has also been evaluated the performance accuracy through Compatibility testing, which proves that no measured data corrupt during communication between SpO2 sensors and host monitors."
  • 2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. This is a hardware device, not an AI model. Testing involved standards compliance and compatibility, not a data-driven test set for an algorithm.

  • 3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. Ground truth for an AI model is not relevant here. Device performance is assessed against engineering standards and functional requirements.

  • 4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable.

  • 5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: No, this is not an AI device.

  • 6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: No, this is not an AI device.

  • 7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc): Not applicable. The "ground truth" for this device's performance is compliance with established international and national standards for medical electrical equipment, biocompatibility, and functional compatibility.

  • 8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This is a hardware device.

  • 9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.

April 2, 2023

Beijing Rongrui-Century Science & Technology Co., Ltd. % Ray Wang General Manager Beijing Believe-Med Technology Service Co., Ltd. Rm.912, Building #15, XiYueHui, No.5, YiHe North Rd., FangShan District Beijing, Beijing 102401 China

Re: K222370

Trade/Device Name: SpO2 Extension Cable Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.2900 Regulation Name: Patient Transducer And Electrode Cable (Including Connector) Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DSA Dated: March 3, 2023 Received: March 3, 2023

Dear Ray Wang:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

{1}------------------------------------------------

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

James J. Lee -S

James J. Lee, Ph.D. Director DHT1C: Division of Sleep Disordered Breathing, Respiratory and Anesthesia Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia. Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known) K222370

Device Name SpO2 Extension Cable

Indications for Use (Describe)

SpO2 Extension Cables are intended to be used to connect SpO2 sensors, placed at appropriate sites on the patient to a monitoring device for SpO2 monitoring by health care professional.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
---------------------------------------------------

X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

{3}------------------------------------------------

The assigned 510(k) Number:

Tab #3 510(k) Summary

This 510(k) Summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with requirements of SMDA 1990 and Title 21, CFR Section 807.92.

    1. Date of Preparation:2023/03/29
    1. Sponsor Identification

Beijing Rongrui-Century Science & Technology Co., Ltd.

3rd Floor, West zone, No.1 Building, No.7 Yard, Fengxian middle Road, HaiDian District, Beijing, 100094, P.R.China.

Contact Person: Calen Chen Position: Quality Manager Tel: +86-769-22243880 Fax: +86-769-22242882 Email: info@r-rui.com

    1. Designated Submission Correspondent
      Mr. Ray Wang

Beijing Believe-Med Technology Service Co., Ltd.

Rm.912, Building #15, XiYueHui, No.5, YiHe North Rd., FangShan District, Beijing, 102401, China

Tel: +86-18910677558 Fax: +86-10-56335780 Email: information(@believe-med.com

{4}------------------------------------------------

4. Identification of Proposed Device

Trade Name: SpO2 Extension Cable Common Name: Cable, Transducer And Electrode, Patient, (Including Connector)

Regulatory Information Classification Name: Cable, Transducer And Electrode, Patient, (Including Connector) Classification: II Product Code: DSA Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.2900 Review Panel: Cardiovascular

Indication for use Statement:

SpO2 Extension Cables are intended to be used to connect SpO2 sensors, placed at appropriate sites on the patient to a monitoring device for SpO2 monitoring by health care professional.

Device Description:

SpO2 Extension Cables are intended to be used to connect SpO2 sensors, placed at appropriate sites on the patient to a monitoring device for SpO2 monitoring by health care professional.

The SpO2 Extension Cable is the replacements for similar cables manufactured by Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) and other third party after manufacturers for their respective monitors.

The SpO2 Extension Cable is comprised of Plug, Cable/Leadwires and Connector. It's intended to plug into monitoring device and connect with SpO2 sensor, for transmitting signals which generated by SpO2 sensor to monitoring device.

By using the same types of construction and technological characteristics to the compatible patient monitor and SpO2 sensor, the SpO2 Extension Cable can avoid measured data corrupted.

The compatible sensors and monitors are shown in the following table:

NO.ModelCompatible Rongrui SensorCompatible Monitors& Nellcor OEM Boards
1RCT006RSJ002A, RSA002DNRSJ002I, RSA002DIRST002A, RSA002DPRST002I, RSA002DARSW002N, RSY002NNELLCOR: N-600X、N-595
2RCT018RSJ001A,RSJ001I,RST001A,RST001I,RSW001N,RSY001N,RSA001DN,RSA001DI,RSA001DP,RSA001DAPhilips: CM100、MP2、X2、MP5

{5}------------------------------------------------

    1. Identification of Predicate Device(s)
      Predicate Device K192404 Patient Monitoring Cables (SpO2 Extension Cable) Shenzhen Coreray Technology Co., Ltd.
  • Non-Clinical Test Conclusion 6.
    Non clinical tests were conducted to verify that the proposed device met all design specifications as was Substantially Equivalent (SE) to the predicate device. The test results demonstrated that the proposed device complies with the following standards:

  • ISO 10993-5: 2009 Biological Evaluation Of Medical Devices -- Part 5: Tests For In Vitro Cytotoxicity

  • ISO 10993-10: 2010 Biological Evaluation Of Medical Devices Part 10: Tests For Irritation A And Skin Sensitization.

  • IEC 60601-1:2012, Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance

  • IEC 60601-1-2:2014, Medical Electrical Equipment-Part 1-2: General Requirements For Basic Safety And Essential Performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility-Requirements And Tests

  • ISO 80601-2-61:2017 Medical electrical equipment-Part 2-61: Particular requirements for basic safety and essential performance of pulse oximeter equipment

  • ANSI AAMI EC53:2013/(R)2020 ECG trunk cables and patient leadwires

SpO2 Extension Cable has also been evaluated the performance accuracy through Compatibility testing, which proves that no measured data corrupt during communication between SpO2 sensors and host monitors.

  • Clinical Test Conclusion 7.
    No clinical study is included in this submission.

  • Substantially Equivalent (SE) Comparison 8.

Table 1 General Comparison

ItemProposed DevicePredicate DeviceRemark
Product nameSpO2 Extension CablePatient Monitoring Cables (SpO2Extension Cable)K192404/
Classification21 CFR 870.290021 CFR 870.2900SAME

{6}------------------------------------------------

Regulation
ClassificationIIIISAME
Product CodeDSADSASAME
Common NameCable, Transducer And Electrode,Patient, (Including Connector)Cable, Transducer And Electrode,Patient, (Including Connector)SAME
Indicationsfor useSpO2 Extension Cables are intendedto be used to connect SpO2 sensors,placed at appropriate sites on thepatient to a monitoring device forSpO2 monitoring by health careprofessional.Patient Monitoring Cables are intendedto be used to connect sensors, placed atappropriate sites on the patient to amonitoring device for generalmonitoring by health care professional.SAME
DesignPlug, Cable/Leadwires and connectorsPlug, Cable/Leadwires and connectorsSAME
UsageReusableReusableSAME
Cable lengths$2m \pm 10%$8ftDifference1
Wire materialShielded & Unshielded Copper withPVC or TPE jacketShielded & Unshielded Copper withTPU jacketDifference2
SterilityNon-sterileNon-sterileSAME
BiocompatibilityMeets ISO 10993-5 Cytotoxicity, ISO10993-10 Sensitization and IrritationMeets ISO 10993-5 Cytotoxicity, ISO10993-10 Sensitization and IrritationSAME
Electrical safetyand PerformanceIEC 60601-1ISO 80601-2-61ANSI AAMI EC53IEC 60601-1ISO 80601-2-61ANSI AAMI EC53SAME
EMCIEC 60601-1-2IEC 60601-1-2SAME

Analysis:

Difference 1 :

There is difference on the cable length, the cable length of the proposed device is 2m ± 10% (Approximately 6.6 ft), the cable length of the predicate device is 8ft, but these cables are same function , the cable length difference would not affect its safety and effectiveness.

Difference 2:

Although the wire material between the proposed device and predicate device have few differences, the proposed device comply with electrical safety standard IEC 60601-1 and the performance standard ISO 80601-2-61 and ANSI AAMI EC53, so the differences would not affect its safety and effectiveness.

9. Substantially Equivalent (SE) Conclusion

Based on the comparison and analysis above, the proposed devices are determined to be Substantially Equivalent (SE) to the predicate devices.

§ 870.2900 Patient transducer and electrode cable (including connector).

(a)
Identification. A patient transducer and electrode cable (including connector) is an electrical conductor used to transmit signals from, or power or excitation signals to, patient-connected electrodes or transducers.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).