The SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Catheter is intended to dilate stenoral, ilio-femoral, popliteal, infra poplited and renal arteries. The device is also indicated for post-dilation of balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents in the peripheral vasculature.

Device Description

The SABERX RADIANZ™ Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Dilatation Catheter is a single-use sterile device, sterilized by ethylene oxide. The SABERX RADIANZ™ Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Dilatation Catheter (hereafter referred to as "SABERX RADIANZ™") is a Rapid Exchange design, consisting of a single inflation lumen and a distal quidewire lumen. The quidewire lumen permits the use of a quidewire (0.018 in.) to facilitate advancement of the catheter to and through the stenosis to be dilated. It begins at the distal tip and terminates at the guidewire exit port. The guidewire exit-port (hole) is 40 cm from the distal tip. The proximal hub section of the catheter provides a clear, onepiece hub with a single-luer port for inflation of the balloon. The coaxial, concentric dual lumen distal shaft connects proximally at the quidewire exit port and distally to the balloon. The proximal shaft with a supporting stainless-steel core wire connects proximally to the hub and distally to the guidewire exit port. The balloon is designed to provide an inflatable segment of known diameter and length at recommended pressures. A balloon protector is placed over the balloon to maintain a low profile. The catheter includes a tapered tip to facilitate advancement of the catheter to and through the stenosis. A lubricious hydrophilic coating covers the distal tip. balloon, and a portion of the shaft, to facilitate balloon placement. The SABERX RADIANZ™ catheter will have multiple radiopaque marker bands that provide fluoroscopic visual reference points to facilitate balloon positioning within the vessel. The SABERX RADIANZ™ catheter is compatible with standard 0.018" guidewires and 4F, 5F, or 6F catheter sheath introducers. The usable catheter length is 190 cm and the proximal shaft has two exit markers located at 115 cm and 140 cm from the distal tip. The SABERX RADIANZ™ catheter is available in eighty-two (82) product configurations with balloon diameters of 2.00 - 8.00 mm in 0.50 mm or 1.00 mm increments. The working lengths of the treatment balloon will be offered in lengths from 20 mm to 300 mm. The associated accessories for SABERX RADIANZ™ include: - . Flushing Needle.

AI/ML Overview

This appears to be an FDA 510(k) summary for a medical device called the "SABERX RADIANZ™ Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Dilatation Catheter." This type of document is for demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not for proving that a device meets specific acceptance criteria through a comparative study with a "human-in-the-loop AI system" or "standalone AI algorithm."

Therefore, most of the requested information regarding AI acceptance criteria, human reader improvement with AI assistance, sample sizes for training/test sets, expert adjudication, etc., is not applicable to this document.

However, I can extract the acceptance criteria and performance data relevant to this physical medical device and its substantial equivalence determination.

Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided document, noting where the information is not applicable (N/A) to this type of device submission:

Device Name: SABERX RADIANZ™ Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Dilatation Catheter

Type of Study: Substantial Equivalence Determination via Non-Clinical Performance Testing for a Physical Medical Device (Catheter)

Purpose of the Study: To demonstrate that the SABERX RADIANZ™ catheter is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device (Crosstella RX PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter cleared under K152873) and thus safe and effective for its intended use.

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

For a physical medical device like this catheter, "acceptance criteria" and "reported performance" refer to the successful completion of specific bench tests and biocompatibility assessments, demonstrating the device's functional integrity and safety. The document states that "passing results for the above tests provide reasonable assurance that the subject device has been designed to meet its intended use."

Test Category	Specific Test	Acceptance Criteria (Implied/Standard)	Reported Device Performance
Biocompatibility	Cytotoxicity MEM Elution	Pass/Biocompatible	Successfully passed
	Sensitization - Guinea Pig Maximization	Pass/Biocompatible	Successfully passed
	Intracutaneous Irritation Reactivity	Pass/Biocompatible	Successfully passed
	Acute Systemic Toxicity	Pass/Biocompatible	Successfully passed
	Materials Mediated Rabbit Pyrogen	Pass/Non-pyrogenic	Successfully passed
	Hemolysis - Extract / Direct Contact	Pass/Biocompatible	Successfully passed
	Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT)	Pass/Biocompatible	Successfully passed
	Platelet & Leukocyte Counts	Pass/Biocompatible	Successfully passed
	Complement Activation Assay	Pass/Biocompatible	Successfully passed
	Bacterial Mutagenicity - Ames Assay	Pass/Non-mutagenic	Successfully passed
	In Vitro Mouse Lymphoma	Pass/Non-genotoxic	Successfully passed
	In Vivo Mouse Micronucleus	Pass/Non-genotoxic	Successfully passed
	In Vivo Thrombogenicity	Pass/Non-thrombogenic	Successfully passed
	USP Physicochemical Aqueous Extract Test	Pass	Successfully passed
	Chemical Characterization	Characterized, within acceptable limits	Successfully characterized
Sterilization	Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Cycle Validation	Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶ per ISO 11135:2014+A1:2019	Achieved SAL of 10⁻⁶; residuals met ISO 10993-7:2008/Cor:2009
Bench Testing	Dimensional verification	Meets design specifications	Successfully completed
	Balloon Preparation	Proper balloon folding/preparation	Successfully completed
	Balloon Rated Burst Pressure (with and without stent)	Withstands specified pressure without bursting	Successfully completed
	Balloon Fatigue (Repeat Balloon Inflations with and without stent)	Maintains integrity over multiple inflations	Successfully completed
	Balloon Compliance	Meets specified compliance profile	Successfully completed
	Balloon Inflation Time	Meets specified inflation time	Successfully completed
	Balloon Deflation Time	Meets specified deflation time	Successfully completed
	Catheter Bond Strength	Withstands specified forces	Successfully completed
	Flexibility and Kink Test	Maintains functionality without kinking under typical use	Successfully completed
	Torque Strength	Withstands specified torque without failure	Successfully completed
	Particulate Evaluation / Coating Uniformity-Integrity	Meets cleanliness and coating integrity standards	Successfully completed
Packaging Testing	Visual inspection	Meets visual quality standards	Successfully completed
	Component position	Correct component placement	Successfully completed
	Peel strength	Meets peel strength specifications	Successfully completed
	Bubble test	Pass	Successfully completed
	Particulate	Meets particulate cleanliness standards	Successfully completed

2. Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance

Sample Size for Test Set: The document does not specify the exact number of units/samples tested for each bench test or biocompatibility test. It only states that "passing results for the above tests provide reasonable assurance." For physical devices, this typically involves a statistically relevant number of samples for each specific test, but the exact N is not disclosed in this summary.
Data Provenance: The data comes from "non-clinical design verification testing" and "biocompatibility testing" performed for the SABERX RADIANZ™ device. The specific country of origin for the testing labs is not mentioned, but the submitter is Cordis Corporation in Miami Lakes, Florida, USA. The testing is retrospective in the sense that it was completed before the 510(k) submission.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

N/A. This device submission does not involve human readers evaluating images or a dataset that requires "ground truth" established by medical experts in the way an AI diagnostic device would. The "ground truth" for this catheter is its adherence to engineering specifications, biocompatibility standards, and functional performance as determined by laboratory testing.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

N/A. See explanation for #3. Adjudication is not applicable as there are no discrepant expert interpretations to resolve.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

N/A. This document describes a physical medical device (catheter), not an AI-assisted diagnostic system. No MRMC study was conducted, nor is it relevant.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

N/A. This device does not have a standalone algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

The "ground truth" for this device's performance is based on established engineering standards, international consensus standards (e.g., ISO, USP), and validated internal test methods that define acceptable limits for device functionality, material properties, and biological safety. For example, for "Balloon Rated Burst Pressure," the ground truth is simply whether the balloon bursts or not at a specified pressure, according to a defined test method. For biocompatibility, it's whether the biological response falls within accepted safe limits as defined by ISO standards.

8. The sample size for the training set

N/A. This is a physical medical device, not an AI algorithm, so there is no training set in the AI sense. The device design and manufacturing processes are "trained" through iterative R&D and validation, but this doesn't correspond to an "AI training set."

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

N/A. See explanation for #8.

Summary

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA acronym with the full name of the agency on the right. The FDA part of the logo is in blue, with the acronym in a square and the full name written out to the right of the square.

October 09, 2020

Cordis Corporation Luis Davila Principal Specialist, Regulatory Affairs 14201 NW 60th Ave Miami Lakes, Florida 33014

Re: K201377

Trade/Device Name: SABERX RADIANZ Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Dilatation Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LIT Dated: September 01, 2020 Received: September 04, 2020

Dear Luis Davila:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part

{1}------------------------------------------------

801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4. Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Sincerely,

For

Gregory O'Connell Assistant Director DHT2C: Division of Coronary and Peripheral Intervention Devices OHT2: Office of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known) K201377

Device Name

SABERX RADIANZ™ Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Dilatation Catheter

Indications for Use (Describe)

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable):

☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

{3}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Summarv - K201377

I. SUBMITTER

Applicant: Cordis Corporation 14201 North West 60th Avenue Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014 USA Establishment Registration: 1016427

Contact: Luis Gerardo Davila Cordis Corporation, a Cardinal Health Company 5452 Betsv Ross Drive Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA Date Prepared: May 21, 2020

II. PROPOSED DEVICE

Name of Device: SABERX RADIANZ™ Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Dilatation Catheter Common Name: Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter Classification Name: Percutaneous Catheter (21 CFR 870.1250), Class II Product Code: LIT

III. PREDICATE DEVICE

Crosstella RX PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter cleared on 01/22/2016 under K152873.

Predicate device cited above has not been the subject of a recall.

Reference Devices: SABER™ PTA Dilatation Catheter cleared on 06/27/2014 under K133843 and SABERX™ PTA Dilatation Catheter not cleared in the US Market.

IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION

The SABERX RADIANZ™ Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Dilatation Catheter is a single-use sterile device, sterilized by ethylene oxide.

The SABERX RADIANZ™ Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Dilatation Catheter (hereafter referred to as "SABERX RADIANZ™") is a Rapid Exchange design, consisting of a single inflation lumen and a distal quidewire lumen. The quidewire lumen permits the use of a quidewire (0.018 in.) to facilitate advancement of the catheter to and through the stenosis to be dilated. It begins at the distal tip and terminates at the guidewire exit port. The guidewire exit-port (hole) is 40 cm from the distal tip. The proximal hub section of the catheter provides a clear, onepiece hub with a single-luer port for inflation of the balloon. The coaxial, concentric dual lumen distal shaft connects proximally at the quidewire exit port and distally to the balloon. The proximal shaft with a supporting stainless-steel core wire connects proximally to the hub and distally to the guidewire exit port. The balloon is designed to provide an inflatable segment of

{4}------------------------------------------------

known diameter and length at recommended pressures. A balloon protector is placed over the balloon to maintain a low profile. The catheter includes a tapered tip to facilitate advancement of the catheter to and through the stenosis. A lubricious hydrophilic coating covers the distal tip. balloon, and a portion of the shaft, to facilitate balloon placement. The SABERX RADIANZ™ catheter will have multiple radiopaque marker bands that provide fluoroscopic visual reference points to facilitate balloon positioning within the vessel.

The SABERX RADIANZ™ catheter is compatible with standard 0.018" guidewires and 4F, 5F, or 6F catheter sheath introducers. The usable catheter length is 190 cm and the proximal shaft has two exit markers located at 115 cm and 140 cm from the distal tip.

The SABERX RADIANZ™ catheter is available in eighty-two (82) product configurations with balloon diameters of 2.00 - 8.00 mm in 0.50 mm or 1.00 mm increments. The working lengths of the treatment balloon will be offered in lengths from 20 mm to 300 mm.

The associated accessories for SABERX RADIANZ™ include:

. Flushing Needle.
The SABERX RADIANZ™ is for use in a catherization lab, hospital or other suitable healthcare facility by appropriately trained medical professionals only.

V. INDICATIONS FOR USE

The SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Catheter is intended to dilate stenoses in iliac, femoral, iliofemoral, popliteal, infra popliteal and renal arteries. The device is also indicated for post-dilation of balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents in the peripheral vasculature

The Indications for Use statement for SABERX RADIANZ™ is similar to the predicate device. The subject and predicate devices have the same fundamental intended use, which is to dilate stenoses in iliac, femoral, ilio-femoral, popliteal, infra popliteal and renal arteries and for stent post-dilation. Minor differences in the Indications for Use statements do not alter the intended use, or raise different questions of safety and effectiveness relative to the predicate.

VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE AND REFERENCE DEVICES

The SABERX RADIANZ™ and the predicate device facilitate the dilation of stenoses in illac, femoral, ilio-femoral, popliteal, infra popliteal and renal arteries and for the stent post-dilation in the peripheral vasculature using the same fundamental mechanism of action. Both devices, the SABERX RADIANZ™ and the predicate, have a guidewire lumen, that after gaining access, permits the use of a guidewire to facilitate advancement of the catheter to and through the stenosis to be dilated and/or to the stent to be post-dilated. Both devices have a tapered tip to facilitate advancement of the catheter to and through the stenosis to be dilated and/or to the stent for post-dilation. Both devices include a hydrophilic coating, which is applied from the distal tip and over the balloon and a portion of the distal shaft for increased lubricity. Both devices, the SABERX RADIANZ™ and the predicate device include a needle for flushing the catheter. The SABERX RADIANZ™ has the following similarities to the predicate device:

{5}------------------------------------------------

Same intended use
. Same principle of operation
Same mechanism of action .
. Same method of sterilization and sterility assurance level
Same biocompatibility classification .
Biocompatible for intended use
Labeled non-pyrogenic ●
Similar materials
Similar components
Similar device dimensions ●
. Similar packaging configuration
Similar compatibility with other devices (i.e. Catheter Sheath and Guiding Catheter). ●

The following technological differences exist between the subject and predicate devices:

SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Catheter is shorter; however, the working length is similar. ●
. SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Catheter is secured in a tray whereas the predicate device is secured by clips.

Furthermore, the SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Catheter (subject device) shares significant similarities with the Cordis SABER™ and SABERX™ devices. The most significant similarities are: 1) The SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Catheter intended use is the same as the SABER™ and SABERX™ intended use and 2) the device component material compositions and the composition of the packaging materials for the SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA are the same as those of the SABER™ and/or SABERX™ catheters.

The SABERX RADIANZ™ has the following similarities to the reference devices:

· All three systems have the same intended used
All three systems include radiopaque markers and have multiple marker bands for balloon positioning.
· All three systems have a hydrophilic coating designed to increase lubricity.
· The SABERX RADIANZ™ and SABERX™ PTA systems utilize a stainless-steel core wire.
· All three systems are compatible for 4F, 5F and 6F quiding catheter sheath introducers.
· All three systems are compatible with an 0.018" guidewire.
· All three systems utilize same device and packaging material compositions.

Based on a thorough analysis of technological characteristics, including design, materials, dimensions, mechanism of action, and clinical use, the differences between the SABERX RADIANZ™, the predicate and reference devices do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness for intended use. No different questions of safety and effectiveness are raised by the SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Dilatation Catheter, for which the intended use is to dilate stenoses in iliac, femoral, ilio-femoral, popliteal, infra popliteal and renal arteries. The device is also indicated for post-dilation of balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents in the peripheral vasculature.

{6}------------------------------------------------

VII. PERFORMANCE DATA

The performance data described below are provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.

Biocompatibility Testing

The SABERX RADIANZ™, like the predicate, is an externally communicating device with limited contact duration (≤ 24 hours) with circulating blood. Biocompatibility testing was performed for SABERX RADIANZ™ in accordance with the International Standard ISO 10993-1 "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process," as recognized by FDA and ISO 10993-1:2009/Cor 1:2010, Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process.. Based on the testing results, SABERX RADIANZ™ is biocompatible for its intended use.

Biocompatibility testing performed to the subject device is listed below

Cytotoxicity MEM Elution .
. Sensitization - Guinea Pig Maximization
Intracutaneous Irritation Reactivity ●
Acute Systemic Toxicity
Materials Mediated Rabbit Pyrogen
Hemolysis - Extract / Direct Contact
Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT)
Platelet & Leukocyte Counts
Complement Activation Assay
Bacterial Mutagenicity - Ames Assay
In Vitro Mouse Lymphoma
In Vivo Mouse Micronucleus
In Vivo Thrombogenicity ●
USP Physicochemical Aqueous Extract Test ●
. Chemical Characterization

Sterilization

The SABERX RADIANZ™ is sterilized using Ethylene Oxide. The sterilization cycle used to sterilize SABERX RADIANZ™, was validated per ISO 11135:2014+A1:2019 Sterilization of health-care products - Ethylene oxide - Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices to provide a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 106. Ethylene oxide and ethylene chlorohydrin residuals meet requirements for limited exposure devices (contact < 24 hours) in accordance with ISO 10993-7:2008/Cor:2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 7: Ethylene oxide sterilization residuals.

Bench Testing

Data collected during non-clinical design verification testing demonstrate substantial equivalence of the SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Dilatation Catheter to the predicate device. The following testing was successfully completed for the SABERX RADIANZ™ per applicable sections of the indicated standards and/or validated internal test methods:

{7}------------------------------------------------

Catheter FDA PTCA Guidance, USP-788 and internal test methods ●
- Dimensional verification o
- Balloon Preparation. o
- Balloon Rated Burst Pressure (with and without stent) o
- Balloon Fatigue (Repeat Balloon Inflations with and without stent) O
- Balloon Compliance O
- Balloon Inflation Time O
- Balloon Deflation Time o
- Catheter Bond Strength O
- Flexibility and Kink Test O
- O Torque Strength
- Particulate Evaluation / Coating Uniformity-Integrity O
Packaging integrity ISO 11607-1:2019 and ISO 11607-2:2019 ●
- Visual inspection O
- Component position O
- Peel strength o
- Bubble test o
- Particulate O

The passing results for the above tests provide reasonable assurance that the subject device has been designed to meet its intended use. No different issues of safety and effectiveness relative to the predicate were raised by this testing.

Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)

This section is not applicable. The SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Dilatation Catheter contains no electronic components, and thus, no electrical safety evaluation is required.

Software Verification and Validation Testing

This section is not applicable. The SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Dilatation Catheter contains no software, and thus, no information regarding software/firmware is required for this device.

Animal Study

No animal testing was performed for the SABERX RADIANZ™PTA Dilatation Catheter.

Clinical Studies

No clinical studies were deemed necessary to support substantial equivalence. Appropriate verification and validation of the device requirements were achieved based on the similarities of the subject device to the predicate and from the results bench testing.

{8}------------------------------------------------

VIII. CONCLUSIONS

The information presented in this Premarket Notification demonstrates the following for the SABERX RADIANZ™:

SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Dilatation Catheter has a legally marketed predicate. ●
. SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Dilatation Catheter has the same Intended Use as the predicate.
. SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Dilatation Catheter has the same principle of operation and mechanism of action.
. SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Dilatation Catheter incorporates the same fundamental technology as the predicate.
Accepted scientific methods and international standards were used to evaluate safety . and performance of the SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Dilatation Catheter relative to the predicate.
. Safety and performance characteristics of the SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Dilatation Catheter are equivalent to the predicate device and do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness.

On the basis of the intended use, design, performance characteristics and non-clinical performance testing, and of detailed comparisons to the legally marketed predicate device, it is concluded that the SABERX RADIANZ™ PTA Dilatation Catheter is appropriate for its intended use and is substantially equivalent to Crosstella RX PTA Dilatation Catheter.

Regulation Number and Section

§ 870.1250 Percutaneous catheter.

(a)
Identification. A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).