(915 days)
The V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen method is designed for the separation of normal hemoglobins (A, A2, and F) in human blood samples, and for the detection of major hemoglobins variants (S and C) by using a capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) buffer with the V8 instrument. The V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen test is indicated for use in patients 2 years of age and older. This test is designed for in-vitro diagnostic use only in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
The V8 instrument is an automated analyzer which performs a complete hemoglobin profile for quantitative analysis of the normal hemoglobin fractions A, A2 and F and for the detection of major hemoglobin variants S and C. The assay is performed on the hemolysate of venous whole blood collected in tubes containing K2EDTA as the anticoagulant. The V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen method uses capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) buffer with the V8 instrument for the separation of normal hemoglobins (A, A2, and F) and detection of major hemoglobin variants (S and C). The V8 AFSA2 Hemo Control is a control material derived from whole blood used as a quantitative and/or qualitative control for the Hemoglobin UltraScreen on the V8 Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) system.
The V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen is a medical device for the separation of normal hemoglobins (A, A2, and F) and the detection of major hemoglobin variants (S and C) in human blood samples. The device uses capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and is indicated for in-vitro diagnostic use in patients 2 years of age and older.
Here's an analysis based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria are implicitly derived from the precision/reproducibility and comparison studies. For the precision studies, the acceptance criteria would be the measured standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of the hemoglobin fractions. For comparison studies, the acceptance criteria are generally an R-value close to 1, a slope close to 1, and an intercept close to 0, along with acceptable confidence intervals.
| Hemoglobin Fraction | Acceptance Criteria (Implied from Precision Studies - Total CV) | Reported Device Performance (20-day Precision - Total CV) | Acceptance Criteria (Implied from Site Comparison - R-value) | Reported Device Performance (Combined Site Comparison - R-value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hb A | Not explicitly stated (e.g., < 5%) | 5.3% (for control) | Not explicitly stated (e.g., > 0.95) | 0.999 |
| Hb F | Not explicitly stated (e.g., < 5%) | 3.4% (for control) | Not explicitly stated (e.g., > 0.95) | 0.993 |
| Hb S | Not explicitly stated (e.g., < 5%) | 1.7% (for control) | Not explicitly stated (e.g., > 0.95) | 0.994 |
| Hb A2 | Not explicitly stated (e.g., < 10%) | 5.8% (for control) | Not explicitly stated (e.g., > 0.95) | 0.957 |
| Hb C | Not explicitly stated (e.g., < 5%) | 1.0% (for control) | Not explicitly stated (e.g., > 0.95) | 0.975 |
Linearity Acceptance Criteria and Performance:
| Fraction | Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Performance (Linear Range) |
|---|---|---|
| HbA | Demonstrate linearity over expected clinical range | 3.7-97.2% |
| HbF | Demonstrate linearity over expected clinical range | 1.1-68.7% |
| HbS | Demonstrate linearity over expected clinical range | 5.8-78.8% |
| HbA2 | Demonstrate linearity over expected clinical range | 1.7-7.6% |
| HbC | Demonstrate linearity over expected clinical range | 1.4-42.6% |
Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) Acceptance Criteria and Performance:
| Fraction | Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Performance (LOD/LOQ %) |
|---|---|---|
| Hb A | Defined lower limit | 3.7 |
| Hb A2 | Defined lower limit | 1.7 |
| Hb F | Defined lower limit | 1.1 |
| Hb S | Defined lower limit | 5.8 |
| Hb C | Defined lower limit | 1.4 |
2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The "test set" in this context refers to the clinical samples used for the comparison studies with the predicate device.
- Sample Size for Comparison Studies (Test Set): A total of 439 patient samples were used across three external sites.
- Hb A quantitation: 320 samples
- Hb A2 quantitation: 412 samples
- Hb F quantitation: 175 samples
- Presumptive Hb S: 143 samples
- Presumptive Hb C: 33 samples
- Data Provenance: The data comes from three external sites, suggesting a multi-center study setup. The samples were "fresh venous K2-EDTA-anticoagulated whole blood," indicating that these were prospective or recently collected samples for analysis. The country of origin is not explicitly stated, but given the submitter's address (Beaumont, Texas, USA) and FDA submission, it is likely the studies were conducted in the USA.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
The document does not mention the use of experts to establish ground truth for the test set. Instead, the "ground truth" for the comparison studies was the results obtained from the predicate device, the Sebia CAPILLARYS Hemoglobin(E) Test (K112491).
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
No adjudication method is described for the test set. The comparison studies directly compared the performance of the V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen to the predicate device.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and the Effect Size of Human Reader Improvement
No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done. This device is an in-vitro diagnostic assay for analyzing blood samples, not an image-based diagnostic that involves human readers.
6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Was Done
Yes, the studies presented are standalone (algorithm only) performance assessments of the V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen instrument. These are bench-top studies and comparison studies demonstrating the device's analytical performance on its own, without direct human intervention in the interpretation of the capillary electrophoresis data beyond routine laboratory procedures. The instrument is described as an "automated analyzer."
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
- For the precision/reproducibility studies, the ground truth was the known composition/percentages of hemoglobin fractions in the controls (AFSA2 and AFSC hemoglobin controls) and patient samples.
- For the comparison studies, the ground truth was the results obtained from the predicate device, the Sebia CAPILLARYS Hemoglobin(E) Test (K112491). This is a common approach for 510(k) submissions, where substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device is demonstrated.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
The document does not explicitly describe a "training set" in the context of a machine learning algorithm. This device is a quantitative assay using capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE), a well-established analytical technique. While the term "training" might apply to calibration or method development, a distinct "training set" with established ground truth as would be used for AI/ML validation is not detailed here. The studies focus on analytical validation (precision, linearity, LOD/LOQ, analytical specificity) and comparison to a predicate.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
As no specific "training set" for an AI/ML algorithm is described, the method for establishing its ground truth is not applicable in this document. The device's performance is validated against established laboratory standards, controls, and a predicate device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo features the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
April 19, 2022
Helena Laboratories, Corp. Justin Padia Director of Regulatory Affairs 1530 Lingbergh Drive Beaumont, Texas 77707
Re: K192931
Trade/Device Name: V8 Nexus Hemoglobin Ultrascreen, V8 AFSA2 Hemo Control Regulation Number: 21 CFR 864.7415 Regulation Name: Abnormal Hemoglobin Assay Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GKA, JBD Dated: October 16, 2019 Received: October 17, 2019
Dear Justin Padia:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Min Wu. Ph.D. Chief Division of Immunology and Hematology Devices OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K192931
Device Name
V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen (Catalog #1828 / Catalog #801100)
V8 Nexus AFSA2 Hemo Control (Catalog #1812)
Indications for Use (Describe)
The V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen method is designed for the separation of normal hemoglobins (A, A2, and F) in human blood samples, and for the detection of major hemoglobins variants (S and C) by using a capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) buffer with the V8 instrument. The V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen test is indicated for use in patients 2 years of age and older. This test is designed for in-vitro diagnostic use only in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
The V8 instrument is an automated analyzer which performs a complete hemoglobin profile for quantitative analysis of the normal hemoglobin fractions A, A2 and F and for the detection of major hemoglobin variants S and C. The assay is performed on the hemolysate of venous whole blood collected in tubes containing K2EDTA as the anticoagulant.
The V8 AFSA2 Hemo Control (Cat. No. 1812) is to be used as a quantitative and/or qualitative control for the Hemoglobin UltraScreen on the V8 Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) system.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
This section includes a description of the device: including the indications for use and technology; a comparison to the predicate device; and a concise summary for any performance testing in the submission.
Purpose for Submission:
New Device
Type of Test:
Quantitative, Capillary Zone Electrophoresis
Submitter's Name:
Helena Laboratories, Corp.
| Address: | 1530 Lindbergh DriveBeaumont, TX 77707 |
|---|---|
| ---------- | -------------------------------------------- |
Phone: (409) 842-3714
Date Summary Prepared: 4/13/2022
Proprietary Names:
V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen (Catalog #1828 / Cat. #801100) V8 AFSA2 Hemo Control (Catalog #1812)
Device Classification:
Product: V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen
Classification: Class II Panel: Hematology Product Code: GKA C. F. R. Section: 864.7415
Product: V8 AFSA2 Hemo Control
Classification: Class II Panel: Hematology Product Code: JBD C. F. R. Section: 864.7440
{4}------------------------------------------------
Intended Use:
The V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen method is designed for the separation of normal hemoglobins (A, A2, and F) in human blood samples, and for the detection of major hemoglobins variants (S and C) by using a capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) buffer with the V8 instrument. The V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen test is indicated for use in patients 2 years of age and older. This test is designed for in-vitro diagnostic use only in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
The V8 instrument is an automated analyzer which performs a complete hemoglobin profile for quantitative analysis of the normal hemoglobin fractions A, A2 and F and for the detection of major hemoglobin variants S and C. The assay is performed on the hemolysate of venous whole blood collected in tubes containing K2EDTA as the anticoagulant.
The V8 AFSA2 Hemo Control (Cat. No. 1812) is to be used as a quantitative and/or qualitative control for the Hemoglobin UltraScreen on the V8 Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) system.
Predicate Comparison for Submission:
Comparison with Predicate Device:
These devices have the same intended use and indications for use and similar technological characteristics and principles of operation. Sample hemolysis is performed automatically by an instrument on EDTA anti-coagulant whole blood specimens.
They are run on different instrumentation platforms; however, both are based on similar technological principles.
The table below provides a description of Helena's device, conveying similarities and differences between the assay and the predicate device:
| Device | Predicate | |
|---|---|---|
| Helena LaboratoriesV8 Nexus HemoglobinUltraScreen Test | SebiaCAPILLARYS Hemoglobin(E)Test | |
| 510(k) Number | K192931 | K112491 |
| Type of Test | Quantitative, Capillary ZoneElectrophoresis | Quantitative, CapillaryElectrophoresis |
| Measurand | Hemoglobin A, F, A2, S, C | Hemoglobin A, F, A2, S, C, E, D |
| Intended User | Clinical Laboratory Professional | Clinical Laboratory Professional |
| Intended Use | In vitro diagnostic hemoglobintest for the quantitative detectionof individual hemoglobin fractionsA, A2 and F and qualitativedetection of major hemoglobinvariants S and C from EDTA anti-coagulated human whole bloodspecimens. | In vitro diagnostic hemoglobin testfor the quantitative detection ofindividual hemoglobin fractions A,A2 and F and qualitative detectionof major hemoglobin variants S, C,E and D from EDTA anti-coagulated human whole bloodspecimens. |
V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen Substantial Equivalence – Comparison to Predicate Device
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Specimen Type | Hemolysate of venous whole blood | Hemolysate of whole blood |
|---|---|---|
| Anticoagulant | K2EDTA | K2EDTA and K3EDTA |
| Sample Preparation | Sample hemolysis performed automatically by an instrument | Sample hemolysis performed automatically by an instrument |
| TechnologicalDetection Principles | Free solution capillary electrophoresis – protein separation occurs, in an electrolyte medium, according to their electrophoretic mobilities. Electropherograms show separated fractions based on mass to charge ratio. | Free solution capillary electrophoresis (FSCE): protein separation in an alkaline buffer (pH 9.4) according to their charge to the electrolyte pH and electroosmotic flow. Electropherograms show separated fractions according to their charge. |
| Control forMigration / Other | V8 AFSA2 Hemo Control | Normal Hb A2 control; HB AFSC |
| AbsorbanceWavelength | 415 nm | 415 nm |
| Instrument | V8 Instrument | CAPILLARYS 2 Instrument |
Sample Hemolysis
V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen - Performed automatically by the system
Sebia CAPILLARYS Hemoglobin(E) - same
Collection Tubes
V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen - EDTA anticoagulant
Sebia CAPILLARYS Hemoglobin(E) - same
Separation System
V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen – Free solution capillary electrophoresis – protein separation occurs, in an electrolyte medium, according to their electrophoretic mobilities. Electropherograms show separated fractions based on mass to charge ratio.
Sebia CAPILLARYS Hemoglobin(E) – Free solution capillary electrophoresis (FSCE): protein separation in an alkaline buffer (pH 9.4) according to their charge to the electrolyte pH and electroosmotic flow. Electrophoretograms show separated fractions according to their charge.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Number of Separation Units
V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen - 8 parallel capillaries
Sebia CAPILLARYS Hemoglobin(E) - 7 parallel capillaries
Automated Sample Introduction
V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen - Continuous loading with sample racks
Sebia CAPILLARYS Hemoglobin(E) - Continuous loading with sample racks
Sample Processing
V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen – Aspiration of whole blood from open tube
Sebia CAPILLARYS Hemoglobin(E) – Aspiration of hemolysate of packed red blood cells from uncapped tube
Assay Throughput
V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen - 32 samples / hour
Sebia CAPILLARYS Hemoglobin(E) - 33 samples/ hour
Kit Components
V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen - All components supplied together
Sebia CAPILLARYS Hemoglobin(E) - All components supplied together
Sample Identification
V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen – Barcode reader racks and tubes
Sebia CAPILLARYS Hemoglobin(E) - Barcode reader racks and tubes
Absorbance Wavelength
V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen – 415 nm
Sebia CAPILLARYS Hemoglobin(E) - 415 nm
{7}------------------------------------------------
Controls for Test:
The V8 AFSA2 Hemo Control (Cat. No. 1812) is to be used as a quantitative and/or qualitative control for the Hemoglobin UltraScreen on the V8 Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) system.
Predicate Controls:
Sebia Normal Hb A2 Control/ Migration control
Sebia Hb AFSC Control
Comparison Table
| Item | Device | Predicate |
|---|---|---|
| Product | V8 AFSA₂ Hemo Control | Normal Hb A2 Control /Migration Control & HB AFSCControl |
| Intended use | Control material derived from wholeblood with a quantitative range to ensuresystem performance | Same |
| Matrix | Human serum based | Same |
| Form | Liquid | Lyophilized |
| Visualizedfractions | Four fractions (Hb A, F, S, A₂) | Same |
| Storage | 2-8°C | Same |
{8}------------------------------------------------
Summary of Performance Testing - Bench:
Performance Testing - Precision/Reproducibility Studies
The precision/reproducibility of the V8 Nexus UltraScreen procedure was evaluated following CLSI EP05-A3 guidelines. The means, standard deviations and coefficients of variation were calculated for each hemoglobin fraction.
20-day Precision/Reproducibility Study using one instrument, one kit lot with AFSA2 and AFSC hemoglobin controls
AFSA2 and AFSC hemoglobin controls were run using a single V8 Nexus instrument and a single UltraScreen kit for 20 days, twice per day with 8 reps per run. Within capillary, Between capillary, Between run, Between day and Total reproducibility estimates were calculated (mean fraction %, SD and CV).
| Fraction | N | Mean% | WithinCapillarySD, CV | BetweenCapillarySD, CV | BetweenRunSD, CV | BetweenDaySD, CV | TotalSD, CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hb A | 320 | 43.2 | 0.13, 0.3 | 1.64, 5.0 | 0.39, 1.2 | 0.39, 1.2 | 1.77, 5.3 |
| Hb F | 320 | 33.1 | 0.10, 0.3 | 1.09, 3.3 | 0.26, 0.8 | 0.26, 0.8 | 1.13, 3.4 |
| Hb S | 320 | 21.7 | 0.15, 0.7 | 0.09, 0.4 | 0.22, 1.0 | 0.22, 1.0 | 0.37, 1.7 |
| Hb A2 | 320 | 1.9 | 0.07, 3.7 | 0.03, 1.6 | 0.07, 3.7 | 0.07, 3.7 | 0.11, 5.8 |
| Fraction | N | Mean% | WithinCapillarySD, CV | BetweenCapillarySD, CV | BetweenRun SD,CV | BetweenDaySD, CV | TotalSD, CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hb A | 320 | 29.3 | 0.09, 0.3 | 0.38, 1.3 | 0.18, 0.6 | 0.18, 0.6 | 0.47, 1.6 |
| Hb F | 320 | 24.1 | 0.07, 0.3 | 0.51, 2.1 | 0.17, 0.7 | 0.19, 0.8 | 0.60, 2.5 |
| Hb S | 320 | 25.0 | 0.10, 0.4 | 0.13, 0.5 | 0.15, 0.6 | 0.18, 0.7 | 0.33, 1.3 |
| Hb C | 320 | 21.6 | 0.11, 0.5 | 0.04, 0.2 | 0.15, 0.7 | 0.15, 0.7 | 0.22, 1.0 |
{9}------------------------------------------------
5-day reproducibility study with three instruments and one kit
Precision/reproducibility studies were performed using fresh and refrigerated venous K2-EDTA patient samples with known hemoglobin variants. Normal Hb AA2, Hb AF (elevated F), Hb ASA2 (elevated S and A2) and Hb AA2C (elevated C and A2) were analyzed over the course of the 5 day x 2 runs/day x 8 reps per run study. One UltraScreen lot, three V8 Nexus instruments and a single operator were employed. Within run, Between run, Between day, Between instrument and Total reproducibility estimates were calculated (mean fraction %, SD and CV).
| HbASample | N | Mean% | WithinrunSD, CV | BetweenrunSD, CV | BetweendaySD, CV | BetweeninstrumentSD, CV | TotalSD, CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 240 | 96.9 | 0.0, 0.0 | 0.0, 0.0 | 0.10, 0.1 | 0.10, 0.1 | 0.10, 0.1 |
| 2 | 240 | 34.8 | 0.35, 1.0 | 0.66, 1.9 | 0.42, 1.2 | 0.42, 1.2 | 0.87, 2.5 |
| 3 | 240 | 61.0 | 0.37, 0.6 | 0.12, 0.2 | 0.43, 0.7 | 0.67, 1.1 | 0.79, 1.3 |
| 4 | 240 | 58.0 | 0.35, 0.6 | 0.29, 0.5 | 0.58, 1.0 | 0.70, 1.2 | 0.93, 1.6 |
| Hb FSample | N | Mean% | WithinrunSD, CV | BetweenrunSD, CV | BetweendaySD, CV | BetweeninstrumentSD, CV | TotalSD, CV |
| 2 | 240 | 65.2 | 0.33, 0.5 | 0.65, 1.0 | 0.46, 0.7 | 0.39, 0.6 | 0.85, 1.3 |
| Hb A2Sample | N | Mean% | WithinrunSD, CV | BetweenrunSD, CV | BetweendaySD, CV | BetweeninstrumentSD, CV | TotalSD, CV |
| 1 | 240 | 3.1 | 0.05, 1.5 | 0.00, 0.1 | 0.05, 1.6 | 0.05, 1.6 | 0.07, 2.2 |
| 3 | 240 | 3.6 | 0.05, 1.3 | 0.01, 0.4 | 0.05, 1.3 | 0.05, 1.3 | 0.07, 1.9 |
| 4 | 240 | 5.5 | 0.07, 1.2 | 0.06, 1.1 | 0.07, 1.2 | 0.07, 1.2 | 0.12, 2.1 |
| Hb SSample | N | Mean% | WithinrunSD, CV | BetweenrunSD, CV | BetweendaySD, CV | BetweeninstrumentSD, CV | TotalSD, CV |
| 3 | 240 | 34.5 | 0.35, 1.0 | 0.17, 0.5 | 0.38, 1.1 | 0.59, 1.7 | 0.76, 2.2 |
| Hb CSample | N | Mean% | WithinrunSD, CV | BetweenrunSD, CV | BetweendaySD, CV | BetweeninstrumentSD, CV | TotalSD, CV |
| 4 | 240 | 36.5 | 0.37, 1.0 | 0.29, 0.8 | 0.58, 1.6 | 0.73, 2.0 | 0.95, 2.6 |
{10}------------------------------------------------
Three site precision/reproducibility study using three instruments and one kit lot
Site to site precision of the UltraScreen Hemoglobin assay was assessed at three different sites. Nine samples of varying levels of hemoglobin A, A2, F, S and C were prepared by controlled proportion mixing to generate hemoglobin percentages for each fraction in the normal and pathologic range, where applicable. One V8 instrument, one lot of V8 Hemoglobin UltraScreen reagent kit (same at all 3 sites (1 internal and 2 external)) and a single operator per site were utilized. The tests were run at 3 Sites x 5 days x 2 runs/day x 4 reps/run. Within run, Between run, Between day, Between site and Total reproducibility estimates were calculated (mean fraction %, SD and CV).
| Hb ASample | N | Mean% | WithinrunSD, CV | BetweenrunSD, CV | BetweendaySD, CV | BetweenSiteSD, CV | TotalSD, CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 120 | 97.2 | 0.00, 0.0 | 0.00, 0.0 | 0.10, 0.1 | 0.10, 0.1 | 0.10, 0.1 |
| 2 | 120 | 74.7 | 0.30, 0.4 | 0.52, 0.7 | 0.37, 0.5 | 0.45, 0.6 | 0.82, 1.1 |
| 3 | 120 | 87.4 | 0.26, 0.3 | 0.26, 0.3 | 0.26, 0.3 | 0.44, 0.5 | 0.61, 0.7 |
| 4 | 120 | 59.3 | 0.18, 0.3 | 0.24, 0.4 | 0.18, 0.3 | 0.18, 0.3 | 0.36, 0.6 |
| 5 | 120 | 76.6 | 0.23, 0.3 | 0.00, 0.0 | 0.23, 0.3 | 0.38, 0.5 | 0.54, 0.7 |
| 6 | 120 | 84.9 | 0.25, 0.3 | 0.00, 0.0 | 0.34, 0.4 | 0.51, 0.6 | 0.76, 0.9 |
| 7 | 120 | 57.1 | 0.34, 0.6 | 0.06, 0.1 | 0.34, 0.6 | 0.34, 0.6 | 0.51, 0.9 |
| 8 | 120 | 78.9 | 0.24, 0.3 | 0.32, 0.4 | 0.32, 0.4 | 0.32, 0.4 | 0.51, 0.6 |
| 9 | 120 | 87.9 | 0.18, 0.2 | 0.26, 0.3 | 0.18, 0.2 | 0.26, 0.3 | 0.44, 0.5 |
| Hb FSample | N | Mean% | WithinrunSD, CV | BetweenrunSD, CV | BetweendaySD, CV | BetweenSiteSD, CV | TotalSD, CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 120 | 23.3 | 0.33, 1.4 | 0.58, 2.5 | 0.35, 1.5 | 0.42, 1.8 | 0.82, 3.5 |
| 3 | 120 | 10.1 | 0.23, 2.3 | 0.25, 2.5 | 0.27, 2.7 | 0.39, 3.9 | 0.62, 6.1 |
| Hb A2Sample | N | Mean% | WithinrunSD, CV | BetweenrunSD, CV | BetweendaySD, CV | BetweenSiteSD, CV | TotalSD, CV |
| 1 | 120 | 2.8 | 0.03, 1.1 | 0.02, 0.7 | 0.03, 1.1 | 0.03, 1.1 | 0.05, 1.8 |
| 2 | 120 | 2.0 | 0.03, 1.5 | 0.01, 0.5 | 0.03, 1.5 | 0.03, 1.5 | 0.05, 2.5 |
| 3 | 120 | 2.5 | 0.05, 2.0 | 0.06, 2.4 | 0.05, 2.0 | 0.05, 2.0 | 0.09, 3.6 |
| 4 | 120 | 3.5 | 0.03, 0.9 | 0.0, 0.0 | 0.03, 0.9 | 0.03, 0.9 | 0.04, 1.1 |
| 5 | 120 | 3.0 | 0.04, 1.3 | 0.01, 0.4 | 0.04, 1.3 | 0.04, 1.3 | 0.06, 2.0 |
| 6 | 120 | 3.2 | 0.05, 1.6 | 0.04, 1.3 | 0.05, 1.6 | 0.05, 1.6 | 0.08, 2.5 |
| 7 | 120 | 5.6 | 0.06, 1.1 | 0.07, 1.3 | 0.06, 1.1 | 0.06, 1.1 | 0.11, 2.0 |
| 8 | 120 | 4.0 | 0.04, 1.0 | 0.01, 0.3 | 0.04, 1.0 | 0.04, 1.0 | 0.06, 1.5 |
| 9 | 120 | 3.5 | 0.05, 1.4 | 0.02, 0.6 | 0.05, 1.4 | 0.05, 1.4 | 0.07, 2.0 |
| Hb SSample | N | Mean% | WithinrunSD, CV | BetweenrunSD, CV | BetweendaySD, CV | BetweenSiteSD, CV | TotalSD, CV |
| 4 | 120 | 37.2 | 0.19, 0.5 | 0.26, 0.7 | 0.19, 0.5 | 0.19, 0.5 | 0.37, 1.0 |
{11}------------------------------------------------
| 5 | 120 | 20.2 | 0.20, 1.0 | 0.04, 0.2 | 0.24, 1.2 | 0.36, 1.8 | 0.51, 2.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 120 | 12.1 | 0.21, 1.7 | 0.05, 0.4 | 0.31, 2.6 | 0.56, 4.6 | 0.74, 6.1 |
| Hb CSample | N | Mean% | WithinrunSD, CV | BetweenrunSD, CV | BetweendaySD, CV | BetweenSiteSD, CV | TotalSD, CV |
| 7 | 120 | 37.3 | 0.34, 0.9 | 0.07, 0.2 | 0.34, 0.9 | 0.37, 1.0 | 0.52, 1.4 |
| 8 | 120 | 17.1 | 0.24, 1.4 | 0.29, 1.7 | 0.31, 1.8 | 0.32, 1.9 | 0.53, 3.1 |
| 9 | 120 | 8.6 | 0.15, 1.7 | 0.33, 3.8 | 0.21, 2.4 | 0.24, 2.8 | 0.46, 5.3 |
Reagent Kit Lot Precision/Reproducibility Using AFSA2
Reagent lot precision/reproducibility studies were performed using one lot of AFSA2 control, three lots of V8 Hemoglobin UltraScreen reagent kits, one V8 Nexus instrument and one operator. The tests were run 5 days x 2 runs/day x 8 reps/run. Within run, Between run, Between day, Between lot and Total reproducibility estimates were calculated (mean fraction %, SD and CV).
| Sample | N | Mean% | WithinrunSD, CV | BetweenrunSD, CV | BetweendaySD, CV | BetweenLotSD, CV | TotalSD, CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 240 | 42.9 | 0.26, 0.6 | 1.63, 3.8 | 0.26, 0.6 | 0.43, 1.0 | 1.72, 4.0 |
| F | 240 | 33.3 | 0.17, 0.5 | 1.03, 3.1 | 0.20, 0.6 | 0.27, 0.8 | 1.10, 3.3 |
| S | 240 | 21.8 | 0.26, 1.2 | 0.57, 2.6 | 0.37, 1.4 | 0.57, 2.6 | 0.92, 4.2 |
| A2 | 240 | 2.0 | 0.07, 3.5 | 0.07, 3.4 | 0.09, 4.4 | 0.09, 4.5 | 0.14, 7.0 |
Performance Testing Summary - Linearity
The linearity of the V8 Nexus UltraScreen procedure was evaluated following CLSI EP06-A guidelines. Linearity studies were performed using the a single V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen reagent kit, a single V8 Nexus and the indicated venous K2-EDTA samples containing different levels of each hemoglobin fraction (9 levels for each fraction). The tests were determined to be linear over the following ranges: HbA: 3.7-97.2%, HbF: 1.1-68.7%, HbS: 5.8-78.8%, HbA2: 1.7-7.6%, HbC: 1.4-42.6%.
{12}------------------------------------------------
Performance Testing Summary - Limit of Detection (LOD), Limit of Quantitation (LOQ):
Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limits of Quantitation (LOQ) were assigned based on the determined lower limits of linearity for each hemoglobin fraction.
| Fraction | LOD/LOQ% |
|---|---|
| Hb A | 3.7 |
| Hb A2 | 1.7 |
| Hb F | 1.1 |
| Hb S | 5.8 |
| Hb C | 1.4 |
Performance Testing Summary - Analytical Specificity:
Interference studies were conducted on venous K2-EDTA whole blood samples: 5 Hb A levels, 4 Hb A2 levels (2 normal and 2 elevated), 2 levels of Hb F, 1 level of Hb S and Hb C. Lipids (Sigma Intralipid #I141), Unconjugated Bilirubin (CalBiochem #2011-1GM) and Conjugated Bilirubin (CalBioChem #201102) and were analyzed with respect to interfering with hemoglobin quantitation. Lipids were tested at 0-25 g/L. Unconjugated and Conjugated bilirubin were tested at 0-25 mg/dL. Each hemoglobin fraction level listed above were analyzed four times per interferent level. No interference was observed.
| Interferent | Maximum concentration |
|---|---|
| Lipids | 25 g/L |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | 25 mg/dL |
| Conjugated Bilirubin | 25 mg/dL |
Interference: K2-EDTA
Interference studies were conducted on fresh venous K2-EDTA whole blood samples: 3 Hb A levels, 3 Hb A2 levels (1 normal and 2 elevated), 1 level of Hb S and Hb C, respectively.. K2-EDTA concentrations were analyzed with respect to interfering with hemoglobin quantitation. K2-EDTA was tested at 3.6 mg/mL (normal) and 7.2 mg/mL (elevated). No interference was observed.
| Interferent | Maximum concentration |
|---|---|
| K2-EDTA | 7.2 mg/mL |
{13}------------------------------------------------
Summary of Performance Testing - Comparison Studies:
Clinical testing was done at three external sites using the V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen test to verify the performance characteristics of the system. Testing was done in accordance with the instructions specified in the V8 Operator Manual and the package insert for the assay.
Three external sites compared V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen to Sebia's Capillarys Hemoglobin(E) Test (K112491). Each site received a different lot of the V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen reagent kits (3 in total).
Fresh venous K2-EDTA-anticoagulated whole blood was used for the analysis. From a total of 439 patient samples-320 hemoglobin A, 412 hemoglobin A2, and 175 hemoglobin F quantitation's were performed. 143 presumptive hemoglobin S and 33 presumptive hemoglobin C. A single data point was collected per platform utilized. UltraScreen data points were accepted only if the data points were within the UltraScreen linearity range established for each hemoglobin fraction. Passing-Bablok regression was utilized to generate regression statistics.
Site 1:
The patient population for Site 1 was 40 normal samples and 141 pathologic samples were analyzed. The following individual determinations were performed: 122 hemoglobin A, 179 hemoglobin A2, 71 hemoglobin F, 70 hemoglobin S and 30 hemoglobin C. Two Hb F differences were >20%. However, these were associated with phenotypes where F is not the diagnosing variant.
| Fraction | N | Range | R | Slope | 95% CI | Intercept | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hb A | 122 | 8.7-97.2 | 0.999 | 1.007 | 1.000,1.017 | -0.74 | -1.67,0.20 |
| Hb A2 | 179 | 1.6-6.1 | 0.995 | 1.000 | 1.000,1.000 | 0.00 | 0.00,0.00 |
| Hb F | 71 | 1.1-44.3 | 0.999 | 1.000 | 0.996,1.003 | 0.10 | 0.06,0.11 |
| Hb S | 70 | 19.7-76.8 | 0.998 | 0.953 | 0.941,0.965 | 2.53 | 1.89,3.04 |
| Hb C | 30 | 23.6-42.3 | 0.975 | 1.00 | 0.923,1.114 | 0.85 | -2.84,3.30 |
Site 2:
The patient population for Site 2 was 54 normal samples and 95 pathologic samples were analyzed. The following individual determinations were performed: 119 hemoglobin A, 128 hemoglobin A2, 65 hemoglobin F, and 41 hemoglobin S. Six Hb A differences were >20%. However, these were associated with phenotypes where A is not the diagnosing variant. Five Hb A2 differences were >20%. Four were associated with hemoglobin variants where A2 is not diagnostic. The other Hb A2 difference >20% was within or below normal range for both analytes. Thirty-one Hb F differences of >20% were associated with twenty-two AFA2 phenotypes with elevated F. No change in diagnosis would result. The other nine were associated with hemoglobin phenotypes where F is not the diagnostic factor.
| Fraction | N | Range | R | Slope | 95% CI | Intercept | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hb A | 119 | 6.8-97.2 | 0.999 | 0.973 | 0.954,0.991 | 2.40 | 0.71,4.17 |
| Hb A2 | 128 | 1.8-5.9 | 0.958 | 1.000 | 1.000,1.000 | 0.20 | 0.20,0.20 |
| Hb F | 65 | 1.1-68.0 | 0.993 | 1.063 | 1.019,1.091 | 0.82 | 0.74,1.06 |
| Hb S | 41 | 13.1-78.6 | 0.995 | 0.921 | 0.897,0.952 | 1.09 | -0.91,2.53 |
| Hb C | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
{14}------------------------------------------------
Site 3:
The patient population for Site 3 was 38 normal samples and 71 pathologic samples were analyzed. The following individual determinations were performed: 79 hemoglobin A, 105 hemoglobin A2, 39 hemoglobin F, and 32 hemoglobin S. Three Hemoglobin C determinations were performed but not analyzed by individual site. These data points were included in the compiled analysis. Twelve Hb A2 differences were >20%. Nine were associated with hemoglobin variants where A2 is not diagnostic. Two were Hb A2 difference >20% were within or below normal range for both analytes. The other Hb A2 difference was associated with an AA2 thalassemia condition where diagnosis would not be changed. Twenty-three Hb F differences of >20% were associated with thirteen AFA2 phenotypes with elevated F. No change in diagnosis would result. The other ten were associated with hemoglobin phenotypes where F is not the diagnostic factor.
| Fraction | N | Range | R | Slope | 95% CI | Intercept | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hb A | 79 | 10.5-97.2 | 0.998 | 0.973 | 0.949,0.989 | 2.55 | 1.28,4.74 |
| Hb A2 | 105 | 1.9-6.9 | 0.931 | 0.963 | 0.893,1.000 | -0.09 | -2.0,0.17 |
| Hb F | 39 | 1.2-31.9 | 0.988 | 1.082 | 1.000,1.149 | 0.86 | 0.57,1.10 |
| Hb S | 32 | 9.6-73.9 | 0.995 | 0.908 | 0.864,0.939 | 2.37 | 1.04,3.91 |
| Hb C | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Sites 1-3 Combined:
| Fraction | N | Range | R | Slope | 95% CI | Intercept | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hb A | 320 | 6.8-97.2 | 0.999 | 0.990 | 0.984,0.998 | 0.78 | 0.12,1.40 |
| Hb A2 | 412 | 1.6-6.9 | 0.957 | 1.000 | 1.000,1.000 | 0.05 | 0.05,0.05 |
| Hb F | 175 | 1.1-68.0 | 0.993 | 1.000 | 0.985,1.020 | 0.70 | 0.52,0.73 |
| Hb S | 143 | 9.6-78.6 | 0.994 | 0.929 | 0.909,0.948 | 2.40 | 1.67,3.22 |
| Hb C | 33 | 23.6-42.3 | 0.975 | 1.000 | 0.925,1.103 | 0.60 | -2.70,3.06 |
Reference Range Assignment
To establish a reference range, 132 normal hemoglobin samples in total were analyzed at 3 sites for Hemoglobin A and Hemoglobin A2 levels using the V8 Nexus Hemoglobin UltraScreen assay. The resulting 95% confidence limits reference ranges are as follows:
Hb A: 96.9-97.2% Hb A2: 2.1-3.4%
Note: The UltraScreen assay does not report quantitation of hemoglobin F below 0.9%. The level of Hemoglobin F in a non-neonatal population is below the reportable limit of the assay.
{15}------------------------------------------------
Conclusion:
The information provided in this premarket submission is complete and has demonstrated safety and efficacy. Helena Laboratories has concluded that this submission supports a substantial equivalence decision, as compared to the predicate device.
§ 864.7415 Abnormal hemoglobin assay.
(a)
Identification. An abnormal hemoglobin assay is a device consisting of the reagents, apparatus, instrumentation, and controls necessary to isolate and identify abnormal genetically determined hemoglobin types.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). A control intended for use with an abnormal hemoglobin assay is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 864.9.