(178 days)
Not Found
No
The description focuses on nucleic acid detection and hybridization techniques, with no mention of AI or ML algorithms for data analysis or interpretation.
No
This device is an in vitro diagnostic test designed to identify microbial organisms and associated resistance genes in blood cultures. It aids in diagnosis and patient management decisions but does not directly treat or prevent disease.
Yes
The intended use explicitly states that the device is "a qualitative nucleic acid multiplex in vitro diagnostic test" and that its results "aids in the diagnosis of bloodstream infection when used in conjunction with other clinical information."
No
The device description clearly outlines a physical instrument (ePlex Instrument) that performs nucleic acid extraction, amplification, and detection using microfluidics, magnetic beads, and electrowetting on a printed circuit board. This involves significant hardware components and processes, not just software.
Yes, this device is an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
The "Intended Use / Indications for Use" section explicitly states: "The GenMark ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is a qualitative nucleic acid multiplex in vitro diagnostic test intended for use on GenMark's ePlex Instrument for simultaneous qualitative detection and identification of multiple potentially pathogenic gram-positive bacterial organisms and select determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance in positive blood culture."
This statement clearly identifies the device as an in vitro diagnostic test.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The GenMark ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is a qualitative nucleic acid multiplex in vitro diagnostic test intended for use on GenMark's ePlex Instrument for simultaneous qualitative detection and identification of multiple potentially pathogenic gram-positive bacterial organisms and select determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance in positive blood culture. In addition, the ePlex BCID-GP Panel is capable of detecting a wide variety of gram-negative bacteria (Pan Gram-Negative assay) and several Candida species (Pan Candida assay). The ePlex BCID-GP Panel is performed directly on blood culture samples identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system and which contain gram-positive organism.
The following bacterial organisms and genes associated with antibiotic resistance are identified using the ePlex BCID-GP Panel: Bacillus cereus group, Bacillus subtilis group, Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium acnes (Propionibacterium acnes), Enterococcus, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus, Listeria monocytogenes, Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS), Streptococcus anginosus group, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS), mecA, mecC, vanA and vanB.
The ePlex BCID-GP Panel contains assays for the detection of genetic determinants associated with resistance to methicillin (mecA and mecC) and vancomycin (vanA and vanB) to aid in the identification of potentially antimicrobial resistant organisms in positive blood culture samples. The antimicrobial resistance gene detected may or may not be associated with the agent responsible for disease.
The ePlex BCID-GP Panel also contains targets designed to detect a broad range of organisms with a potentially misleading Gram stain result or organisms that may be missed by Gram staining altogether, for example in the case of co-infections. These include a broad Pan Gram-Negative assay as well as a Pan Candida assay, which is designed to detect four of the most prevalent Candida species: Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei and Candida parapsilosis.
The detection and identification of specific bacterial and fungal nucleic acids from individuals exhibiting signs and/or symptoms of bloodstream infection aids in the diagnosis of bloodstream infection when used in conjunction with other clinical information. The results from the ePlex BCID-GP Panel are intended to be interpreted in conjunction with Gram stain results and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions.
Negative results in the setting of a suspected bloodstream infection may be due to infection with pathogens that are not detected by this test. Positive results do not rule out co-infection with other organisms; the organism(s) detected by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel may not be the definite cause of disease. Additional laboratory testing (e.g. sub-culturing of positive blood cultures for identification of organisms not detected by ePlex BCID-GP Panel and for susceptibility testing. differentiation of mixed growth and association of antimicrobial resistance marker genes to a specific organism) and clinical presentation must be taken into consideration in the final diagnosis of blood stream infection.
Product codes
PAM, PEN, PEO
Device Description
The ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is based on the principles of competitive nucleic acid hybridization using a sandwich assay format, wherein a single-stranded target binds concurrently to a sequence-specific solution-phase signal probe and a solid-phase electrode-bound capture probe. The test employs nucleic acid extraction, target amplification via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and hybridization of target DNA. In the process, the double-stranded PCR amplicons are digested with exonuclease to generate single-stranded DNA suitable for hybridization.
Nucleic acid extraction from biological samples occurs within the cartridge via cell lysis, nucleic acid capture onto magnetic beads, and release for amplification. The nucleic acid extraction is processed through microfluidic liquid handling. Once the nucleic acid targets are captured and inhibitors are washed away, the magnetic particles are delivered to the electrowetting environment on the printed circuit board (PCB) and the targets are eluted from the particles and amplified.
During hybridization, the single-stranded target DNA binds to a complementary, single-stranded capture probe immobilized on the working gold electrode surface. Single-stranded signal probes (labeled with electrochemically active ferrocenes) bind to specific target sequence / region adjacent to the capture probe. Simultaneous hybridization of target to signal probes and capture probe is detected by alternating current voltammetry (ACV). Each working electrode on the array contains specific capture probes, and sequential analysis of each electrode allows detection of multiple analyte targets.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Blood culture samples
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Clinical performance was evaluated in positive blood culture samples prospectively and retrospectively collected.
Prospective samples: collected at 7 clinical sites in 2 phases.
- Phase 1: June 2014 through July 2016, 400 samples were prospectively collected and frozen. 8 of these samples were withdrawn (5 due to patient already enrolled, 1 collected outside timeframe, 1 not viable on subculture, 1 from autopsy). Total of 392 evaluable samples.
- Phase 2: January through February 2018, 319 samples were prospectively collected and tested fresh (never frozen). Total of 319 evaluable samples.
- Total prospective evaluable samples: 711 (312 fresh, 399 frozen).
Retrospective samples: 586 samples were collected retrospectively, and all 586 were evaluable.
Contrived samples: 565 contrived samples were evaluated. These were prepared by spiking an isolate into a blood culture bottle and growing until flagged positive by a continuously monitoring blood culture system. Samples were removed within 8 hours of positivity and stored frozen until testing.
Comparator Method: The performance of the ePlex BCID-GP Panel was compared to standard laboratory procedures, including traditional and automated culture, MALDI-TOF IVD, and microbiological and biochemical techniques for organism identification. For samples with Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus hominis, or Candida parapsilosis identified by standard laboratory procedures, confirmation was done using analytically validated PCR assays followed by bi-directional sequencing or 16S sequencing. For antibiotic resistance genes (mecA, mecC, vanA, vanB), the ePlex BCID-GP Panel was compared to analytically validated qPCR amplification assays followed by bi-directional sequencing in samples with an associated organism identified (i.e., Staphylococcus, Enterococcus).
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
Study Type: Clinical Performance and Analytical Performance (Limit of Detection, Analytical Reactivity (Inclusivity), Analytical Specificity (Cross-Reactivity and Exclusivity), Bottle Positivity, Reproducibility, Interfering Substances and Sample Matrix Equivalency, Carryover and Cross-Contamination, Competitive Inhibition Study). MRMC and AUC not found.
Clinical Performance:
- Sample Size: 711 prospective samples (312 fresh, 399 frozen), 586 retrospective samples, and 565 contrived samples. Total evaluable samples for clinical performance were 1297 (prospective + retrospective samples) for individual analytes, plus 565 contrived samples (where applicable).
- Key Results:
- Sensitivity/Positive Percent Agreement (PPA): Ranges from 0.0% to 100% depending on the target and sample type. Most targets show high PPA in combined prospective/retrospective samples, generally above 90%, with some exceptions (e.g., Corynebacterium at 78.4%, Cutibacterium acnes at 90.0%). Contrived samples generally show 100% PPA.
- Specificity/Negative Percent Agreement (NPA): Generally very high, mostly 100% for many targets across all sample types, reflecting low false positive rates. When not 100%, it is still very high (e.g., Staphylococcus at 98.5%, Enterococcus faecium at 99.4%).
- Co-detections: In 1297 clinical samples, 103 bacterial co-detections were identified by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel.
- Prospective samples: 5.3% double detections, 0.1% triple detections.
- Retrospective samples: 9.6% co-detections, 1.4% triple detections.
Analytical Performance:
- Limit of Detection (LoD): LoD was identified and verified for each assay using at least two quantified reference strains in simulated blood culture sample matrix. LoD concentrations range from 1 x 10^4 CFU/mL to 1 x 10^8 CFU/mL for various organisms.
- Analytical Reactivity (Inclusivity): 459 strains/isolates were evaluated. Most strains were detected successfully at 1 x 10^6 CFU/mL or less for bacteria, and 1 x 10^6 CFU/mL for fungi. Some required higher concentrations for detection.
- Analytical Specificity (Cross-Reactivity and Exclusivity): 3 organisms showed cross-reactivity: Burkholderia cepacia with Corynebacterium assay (>=1x10^7 CFU/mL), unspeciated Rhodococcus strain (ATCC 49988) with Micrococcus assay (>=1x10^7 CFU/mL), and Bacillus badius with Bacillus subtilis group assay (7 x 10^7 CFU/mL). No cross-reactivity was observed for on-panel gram-positive organisms.
- Bottle Positivity: Estimated bottle positivity concentrations are equivalent to or greater than the established LoD for each assay.
- Reproducibility: High level of agreement with expected results was demonstrated across three sites, two operators, and three cartridge lots. Most targets showed 100% agreement. Cutibacterium acnes showed lower agreement at lower concentrations (93.5% at 4.4x10^7 CFU/mL, 96.3% at 1.1x10^8 CFU/mL), which was expected due to analyte concentration relative to LoD.
- Interfering Substances and Sample Matrix Equivalency: 18 potentially interfering substances were tested, and none were found to inhibit the ePlex BCID-GP Panel at clinically relevant concentrations. Of 13 bottle types, 11 showed no interference. One lot of BACTEC™ Plus Anaerobic bottles showed false positives for Pan Gram-Negative. The BacT/ALERT® FN Plus bottle type showed lower sensitivity for some targets (Pan Gram-Negative and E. faecium with vanA).
- Carryover and Cross-Contamination: No false positives were detected in negative runs over 120 runs, indicating no carryover or cross-contamination.
- Competitive Inhibition Study: No competitive inhibition was observed in any replicates of the twelve testing conditions in dual infection mixes.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
-
Sensitivity/Positive Percent Agreement (PPA):
- Bacillus cereus group: 91.7% (64.6-98.5) overall clinical, 100% (92.3-100) contrived.
- Bacillus subtilis group: 100% (34.2-100) overall clinical, 100% (92.9-100) contrived.
- Corynebacterium: 78.4% (65.4-87.5) overall clinical, 100% (83.9-100) contrived.
- Cutibacterium acnes: 90.0% (69.9-97.2) overall clinical, 96.2% (81.1-99.3) contrived.
- Enterococcus: 96.2% (92.6-98.0) overall clinical, 100% (97.0-100) contrived.
- Enterococcus faecalis: 94.2% (89.1-97.1) overall clinical, 100% (93.1-100) contrived.
- Enterococcus faecium: 96.9% (89.5-99.2) overall clinical, 100% (94.0-100) contrived.
- Lactobacillus: 100% (77.2-100) overall clinical, 97.0% (84.7-99.5) contrived.
- Listeria: 100% (34.2-100) overall clinical, 98.7% (92.8-99.8) contrived.
- Listeria monocytogenes: 100% (34.2-100) overall clinical, 100% (92.3-100) contrived.
- Micrococcus: 88.6% (76.0-95.0) overall clinical, 100% (87.5-100) contrived.
- Staphylococcus: 97.7% (96.2-98.6) overall clinical, 100% (96.5-100) contrived.
- Staphylococcus aureus: 96.9% (94.2-98.4) overall clinical, 100% (93.9-100) contrived.
- Staphylococcus epidermidis: 93.1% (88.0-96.1) overall clinical, 100% (20.7-100) contrived.
- Staphylococcus lugdunensis: 100% (61.0-100) overall clinical, 100% (92.1-100) contrived.
- Streptococcus: 96.8% (94.1-98.3) overall clinical, 100% (93.7-100) contrived.
- Streptococcus agalactiae: 95.8% (86.0-98.8) overall clinical, 100% (67.6-100) contrived.
- Streptococcus anginosus group: 93.3% (82.1-97.7) overall clinical, 100% (85.7-100) contrived.
- Streptococcus pneumoniae: 95.7% (88.0-98.5) overall clinical, 0/0 contrived.
- Streptococcus pyogenes: 96.4% (82.3-99.4) overall clinical, 100% (87.1-100) contrived.
- mecA (Staphylococcus): 97.1% (95.0-98.3) overall clinical, 100% (74.1-100) contrived.
- mecA (S. aureus): 97.9% (94.8-99.2) overall clinical, 100% (72.2-100) contrived.
- mecA (S. epidermidis): 98.2% (93.6-99.5) overall clinical, 100% (20.7-100) contrived.
- mecA (S. lugdunensis): 100% (20.7-100) overall clinical, 0/0 contrived.
- mecC (Staphylococcus): 0/0 overall clinical, 100% (92.7-100) contrived.
- vanA (Enterococcus): 93.8% (85.2-97.6) overall clinical, 100% (94.0-100) contrived.
- vanA (E. faecalis): 80.0% (54.8-93.0) overall clinical, 100% (72.2-100) contrived.
- vanA (E. faecium): 100% (93.0-100) overall clinical, 100% (92.9-100) contrived.
- vanB (Enterococcus): 100% (20.7-100) overall clinical, 100% (93.1-100) contrived.
- vanB (E. faecalis): 100% (20.7-100) overall clinical, 100% (91.6-100) contrived.
- vanB (E. faecium): 0/0 overall clinical, 100% (72.2-100) contrived.
- Pan Candida: 77.8% (45.3-93.7) overall clinical, 93.8% (87.0-97.1) non-intended use samples.
- Pan Gram-Negative: 83.7% (70.0-91.9) overall clinical, 97.1% (94.8-98.4) non-intended use samples.
-
Specificity/Negative Percent Agreement (NPA):
- Bacillus cereus group: 100% (99.8-100) overall clinical, 100% (99.3-100) contrived.
- Bacillus subtilis group: 100% (99.7-100) overall clinical, 100% (99.3-100) contrived.
- Corynebacterium: 99.8% (99.4-100) overall clinical, 100% (99.3-100) contrived.
- Cutibacterium acnes: 99.8% (99.4-100) overall clinical, 100% (99.3-100) contrived.
- Enterococcus: 99.9% (99.5-100) overall clinical, 100% (99.1-100) contrived.
- Enterococcus faecalis: 100% (99.7-100) overall clinical, 100% (99.3-100) contrived.
- Enterococcus faecium: 99.4% (98.7-99.7) overall clinical, 100% (99.2-100) contrived.
- Lactobacillus: 99.8% (99.4-100) overall clinical, 100% (99.3-100) contrived.
- Listeria: 99.9% (99.6-100) overall clinical, 100% (99.2-100) contrived.
- Listeria monocytogenes: 100% (99.7-100) overall clinical, 100% (99.3-100) contrived.
- Micrococcus: 99.9% (99.5-100) overall clinical, 100% (99.3-100) contrived.
- Staphylococcus: 98.5% (97.2-99.2) overall clinical, 100% (99.2-100) contrived.
- Staphylococcus aureus: 99.4% (98.6-99.7) overall clinical, 100% (99.2-100) contrived.
- Staphylococcus epidermidis: 98.2% (97.2-98.8) overall clinical, 100% (99.3-100) contrived.
- Staphylococcus lugdunensis: 99.8% (99.4-100) overall clinical, 99.8% (98.9-100) contrived.
- Streptococcus: 99.1% (98.3-99.5) overall clinical, 100% (99.2-100) contrived.
- Streptococcus agalactiae: 99.8% (99.4-100) overall clinical, 100% (99.3-100) contrived.
- Streptococcus anginosus group: 99.8% (99.3-99.9) overall clinical, 100% (99.3-100) contrived.
- Streptococcus pneumoniae: 99.8% (99.4-100) overall clinical, 100% (99.3-100) contrived.
- Streptococcus pyogenes: 100% (99.7-100) overall clinical, 100% (99.3-100) contrived.
- mecA (Staphylococcus): 95.3% (91.8-97.4) overall clinical, 100% (96.1-100) contrived.
- mecA (S. aureus): 95.9% (89.9-98.4) overall clinical, 100% (92.7-100) contrived.
- mecA (S. epidermidis): 92.0% (81.2-96.8) overall clinical, 0/0 contrived.
- mecA (S. lugdunensis): 100% (56.6-100) overall clinical, 100% (92.1-100) contrived.
- mecC (Staphylococcus): 100% (99.4-100) overall clinical, 100% (93.6-100) contrived.
- vanA (Enterococcus): 98.6% (95.0-99.6) overall clinical, 100% (94.5-100) contrived.
- vanA (E. faecalis): 100% (97.0-100) overall clinical, 100% (91.6-100) contrived.
- vanA (E. faecium): 85.7% (60.1-96.0) overall clinical, 100% (72.2-100) contrived.
- vanB (Enterococcus): 100% (98.2-100) overall clinical, 100% (95.1-100) contrived.
- vanB (E. faecalis): 100% (97.3-100) overall clinical, 100% (72.2-100) contrived.
- vanB (E. faecium): 100% (94.4-100) overall clinical, 100% (92.9-100) contrived.
- Pan Candida: 99.8% (99.0-100) overall clinical, 99.7% (98.5-100) non-intended use samples.
- Pan Gram-Negative: 99.4% (98.4-99.8) overall clinical, 99.0% (94.8-99.8) non-intended use samples.
-
Overall Validity Rate (from Instrument Performance): 99.9% (99.7%-100%) after repeat testing.
Predicate Device(s)
Reference Device(s)
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information
Not Found
§ 866.3365 Multiplex nucleic acid assay for identification of microorganisms and resistance markers from positive blood cultures.
(a)
Identification. A multiplex nucleic acid assay for identification of microorganisms and resistance markers from positive blood cultures is a qualitative in vitro device intended to simultaneously detect and identify microorganism nucleic acids from blood cultures that test positive by Gram stain or other microbiological stains. The device detects specific nucleic acid sequences for microorganism identification as well as for antimicrobial resistance. This device aids in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections when used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. However, the device does not replace traditional methods for culture and susceptibility testing.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's guideline document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guideline: Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay for Identification of Microorganisms and Resistance Markers from Positive Blood Cultures.” For availability of the guideline document, see § 866.1(e).
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left, there is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
December 20, 2018
GenMark Diagnostics, Incorporated Alan Maderazo VP, Quality, Regulatory & Clinical Affairs 5964 La Place Court Carlsbad, California 92008
Re: K181663
Trade/Device Name: ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panel - Gram Positive (BCID-GP) Panel Regulation Number: 21 CFR 866.3365 Regulation Name: Multiplex nucleic acid assay for identification of microorganisms and resistance markers from positive blood cultures Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PAM, PEN, PEO Dated: June 22, 2018 Received: June 25, 2018
Dear Alan Maderazo:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you. however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
1
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.html; good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Uwe Scherf -S
Uwe Scherf, M.Sc., Ph.D. Director Division of Microbiology Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K181663
Device Name
ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel
Indications for Use (Describe)
The GenMark ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is a qualitative nucleic acid multiplex in vitro diagnostic test intended for use on GenMark's ePlex Instrument for simultaneous qualitative detection and identification of multiple potentially pathogenic gram-positive bacterial organisms and select determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance in positive blood culture. In addition, the ePlex BCID-GP Panel is capable of detecting a wide variety of gram-negative bacteria (Pan Gram-Negative assay) and several Candida species (Pan Candida assay). The ePlex BCID-GP Panel is performed directly on blood culture samples identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system and which contain gram-positive organism.
The following bacterial organisms and genes associated with antibiotic resistance are identified using the ePlex BCID-GP Panel: Bacillus cereus group, Bacillus subtilis group, Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium acnes (Propionibacterium acnes), Enterococcus, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus, Listeria monocytogenes, Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS), Streptococcus anginosus group, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS), mecA, mecC, vanA and vanB.
The ePlex BCID-GP Panel contains assays for the detection of genetic determinants associated with resistance to methicillin (mecA and mecC) and vancomycin (vanA and vanB) to aid in the identification of potentially antimicrobial resistant organisms in positive blood culture samples. The antimicrobial resistance gene detected may or may not be associated with the agent responsible for disease.
The ePlex BCID-GP Panel also contains targets designed to detect a broad range of organisms with a potentially misleading Gram stain result or organisms that may be missed by Gram staining altogether, for example in the case of co-infections. These include a broad Pan Gram-Negative assay as well as a Pan Candida assay, which is designed to detect four of the most prevalent Candida species: Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei and Candida parapsilosis.
The detection and identification of specific bacterial and fungal nucleic acids from individuals
3
exhibiting signs and/or symptoms of bloodstream infection aids in the diagnosis of bloodstream infection when used in conjunction with other clinical information. The results from the ePlex BCID-GP Panel are intended to be interpreted in conjunction with Gram stain results and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions.
Negative results in the setting of a suspected bloodstream infection may be due to infection with pathogens that are not detected by this test. Positive results do not rule out co-infection with other organisms; the organism(s) detected by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel may not be the definite cause of disease. Additional laboratory testing (e.g. sub-culturing of positive blood cultures for identification of organisms not detected by ePlex BCID-GP Panel and for susceptibility testing. differentiation of mixed growth and association of antimicrobial resistance marker genes to a specific organism) and clinical presentation must be taken into consideration in the final diagnosis of blood stream infection.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
---|---|
☒ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
4
510(k) Summary
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
Submitter Information
GenMark Diagnostics, Incorporated Submitter: 5964 La Place Court Carlsbad, CA 92008
- Manufacturer: GenMark Diagnostics, Incorporated 5964 La Place Court Carlsbad, CA 92008
Establishment Registration Number: 3008632402
| Contact: | Alan Maderazo, Ph.D., RAC
Vice President, Quality, Regulatory and Clinical Affairs |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Phone: | 760-448-4308 |
| Fax: | 760-683-6961 |
| E-mail: | Al.Maderazo@genmarkdx.com |
| Alternate Contact: | Beth Stofka
Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
| Phone: | 760-579-4778 |
| Fax: | 760-683-6961 |
| E-mail: | Beth.Stofka@genmarkdx.com |
| Date Prepared: | June 22, 2018 |
Name of Device and Classification
Product Name: | ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel |
---|---|
Device Classification: | 866.3980, Multiplex nucleic acid assay for identification of |
microorganisms and resistance markers from positive blood cultures, | |
Class II | |
Product Code(s): | PAM, PEN, PEO |
5
Predicate Device
Predicate:
FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel; BioFire Diagnostics; K130914
Device Description
The ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is based on the principles of competitive nucleic acid hybridization using a sandwich assay format, wherein a single-stranded target binds concurrently to a sequence-specific solution-phase signal probe and a solid-phase electrode-bound capture probe. The test employs nucleic acid extraction, target amplification via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and hybridization of target DNA. In the process, the double-stranded PCR amplicons are digested with exonuclease to generate single-stranded DNA suitable for hybridization.
Nucleic acid extraction from biological samples occurs within the cartridge via cell lysis, nucleic acid capture onto magnetic beads, and release for amplification. The nucleic acid extraction is processed through microfluidic liquid handling. Once the nucleic acid targets are captured and inhibitors are washed away, the magnetic particles are delivered to the electrowetting environment on the printed circuit board (PCB) and the targets are eluted from the particles and amplified.
During hybridization, the single-stranded target DNA binds to a complementary, single-stranded capture probe immobilized on the working gold electrode surface. Single-stranded signal probes (labeled with electrochemically active ferrocenes) bind to specific target sequence / region adjacent to the capture probe. Simultaneous hybridization of target to signal probes and capture probe is detected by alternating current voltammetry (ACV). Each working electrode on the array contains specific capture probes, and sequential analysis of each electrode allows detection of multiple analyte targets.
6
Intended Use/Indications for Use
The GenMark ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is a qualitative nucleic acid multiplex in vitro diagnostic test intended for use on GenMark's ePlex Instrument for simultaneous qualitative detection and identification of multiple potentially pathogenic gram-positive bacterial organisms and select determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance in positive blood culture. In addition, the ePlex BCID-GP Panel is capable of detecting a wide variety of gram-negative bacteria (Pan Gram-Negative assay) and several Candida species (Pan Candida assay). The ePlex BCID-GP Panel is performed directly on blood culture samples identified as positive by a continuous monitoring blood culture system and which contain gram-positive organism.
The following bacterial organisms and genes associated with antibiotic resistance are identified using the ePlex BCID-GP Panel: Bacillus cereus group, Bacillus subtilis group, Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium acnes (Propionibacterium acnes), Enterococcus, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus, Listeria monocytogenes, Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Streptococcus, Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS), Streptococcus anginosus group, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS), mecA, mecC, vanA and vanB.
The ePlex BCID-GP Panel contains assays for the detection of genetic determinants associated with resistance to methicillin (mecA and mecC) and vancomycin (vanA and vanB) to aid in the identification of potentially antimicrobial resistant organisms in positive blood culture samples. The antimicrobial resistance gene detected may or may not be associated with the agent responsible for disease.
The ePlex BCID-GP Panel also contains targets designed to detect a broad range of organisms with a potentially misleading Gram stain result or organisms that may be missed by Gram staining altogether, for example in the case of co-infections. These include a broad Pan Gram-Negative assay as well as a Pan Candida assay, which is designed to detect four of the most prevalent Candida species: Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei and Candida parapsilosis.
7
The detection and identification of specific bacterial and fungal nucleic acids from individuals exhibiting signs and/or symptoms of bloodstream infection aids in the diagnosis of bloodstream infection when used in conjunction with other clinical information. The results from the ePlex BCID-GP Panel are intended to be interpreted in conjunction with Gram stain results and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions.
Negative results in the setting of a suspected bloodstream infection may be due to infection with pathogens that are not detected by this test. Positive results do not rule out co-infection with other organisms; the organism(s) detected by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel may not be the definite cause of disease. Additional laboratory testing (e.g. sub-culturing of positive blood cultures for identification of organisms not detected by ePlex BCID-GP Panel and for susceptibility testing. differentiation of mixed growth and association of antimicrobial resistance marker genes to a specific organism) and clinical presentation must be taken into consideration in the final diagnosis of blood stream infection.
Summary of Technological Characteristics of the Device Compared to the Predicate Device
The GenMark ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel ("Subject Device") and the legally marketed device, FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive Panel, K130914, ("Predicate Device") are described below:
Characteristic | Subject Device | Predicate Device |
---|---|---|
Product Name | ePlex BCID-GP Panel | FilmArray BCID Panel |
Manufacturer | GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. | BioFire Diagnostics, Inc. |
Organisms | ||
Detected | Bacillus cereus group Bacillus subtilis group Corynebacterium Cutibacterium acnes (P. acnes) Enterococcus Enterococcus facealis Enterococcus faecium Lactobacillus Listeria Listeria monocytogenes Micrococcus Staphylococcus Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus epidermidis | Enterococci, Listeria monocytogenes, |
commonly encountered Staphylococci | ||
(including specific differentiation of | ||
Staphylococcus aureus), commonly | ||
encountered Streptococci (with | ||
specific differentiation of | ||
Streptococcus agalactiae, | ||
Streptococcus pneumoniae, and | ||
Streptococcus pyogenes), | ||
Acinetobacter baumannii, commonly | ||
encountered Enterobacteriaceae | ||
(including specific differentiation of | ||
the Enterobacter cloacae complex, | ||
Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, | ||
Characteristic | Subject Device | Predicate Device |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis Streptococcus Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) Streptococcus anginosus group Streptococcus pneumonia Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS) Pan Gram-Negative Pan Candida | Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus, and | |
Serratia marcescens), Haemophilus | ||
influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis | ||
(encapsulated), Pseudomonas | ||
aeruginosa, Candida albicans, | ||
Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, | ||
Candida parapsilosis, and Candida | ||
tropicalis. | ||
Resistance Genes | ||
Detected | Genetic determinants of resistance to | |
methicillin ( mecA and mecC ) and | ||
vancomycin ( vanA and vanB ) | Genetic determinants of resistance to | |
methicillin ( mecA ), vancomycin | ||
( vanA and vanB ), and carbapenems | ||
( bla KPC) | ||
Indication for | ||
Use | The GenMark BCID-GP panel is | |
indicated as an aid in the diagnosis of | ||
specific agents of bacteremia. The use | ||
of additional laboratory testing (e.g. | ||
sub-culturing of positive blood cultures | ||
for identification of organisms not | ||
detected by BCID-GP Panel and for | ||
susceptibility testing, differentiation of | ||
mixed growth, and association of | ||
antimicrobial resistance marker genes to | ||
a specific organism) and clinical | ||
presentation must be taken into | ||
consideration in the final diagnosis of | ||
blood stream infection. | FilmArray BCID is indicated as an aid | |
in the diagnosis of specific agents of | ||
bacteremia and fungemia and results | ||
should be used in conjunction with | ||
other clinical and laboratory findings. | ||
Specimen Type | Gram-Positive Blood Culture | Gram-Positive & Gram-Negative |
Blood Culture | ||
Chemistry | Reagents on cartridge include: sample | |
lysis and nucleic acid extraction, PCR | ||
amplification and hybridization-based | ||
electrochemical detection reagents. | The FilmArray BCID pouch contains | |
freeze-dried reagents to perform | ||
nucleic acid purification and nested, | ||
multiplex PCR with DNA melt | ||
analysis. | ||
Hardware | GenMark ePlex Instrument & Single | |
Use Cartridge | FilmArray Instrument and assay pouch | |
Software | ||
Interface | ||
Result Reporting | GenMark ePlex System Software GenMark ePlex BCID-GP Panel | |
Software | The FilmArray Software automatically | |
interprets the results of each DNA | ||
melt curve analysis and combines the | ||
data with the results of the internal | ||
pouch controls to provide a test result | ||
for each organism and antimicrobial | ||
resistance gene on the panel. |
8
Analysis of the similarities and differences indicate that the devices are substantially equivalent in their intended uses/indications for use, and are generally the same regarding user process, ease
9
of use and general operator protocol. Comparison of technological similarities and differences between the proposed device and the predicate do not raise new or different questions of safety and effectiveness, and therefore render the proposed device as substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Summary of Performance Data
EXPECTED VALUES
A prospective, multicenter clinical study was conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of the ePlex BCID-GP Panel in positive blood culture samples. A total of 711 samples were prospectively collected at 7 clinical sites in 2 phases from patients of all ages and genders. In the first phase from June 2014 through July 2016, 399 samples were prospectively collected and frozen; from January through February 2018, 312 samples were prospectively collected and tested fresh (never frozen). The expected values of individual analytes based on the ePlex BCID-GP Panel results in prospective samples are summarized by age group and by site in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.
10
Table 1: Expected Value by Age Group (Prospective Samples)
| Target | All Ages
(N=711) | Age mecA
Staphylococcus | Prospective (Fresh) | 86/89 | 96.6 (90.6-98.8) | 85/93 | 91.4 (83.9-95.6) |
| | Prospective (Frozen) | 164/171 | 95.9 (91.8-98.0) | 101/103 | 98.1 (93.2-99.5) |
| | Prospective (All) | 250/260 | 96.2 (93.1-97.9) | 186/196 | 94.9 (90.9-97.2) |
| | Retrospective | 151/153 | 98.7 (95.4-99.6) | 37/38 | 97.4 (86.5-99.5) |
| | Prospective/Retrospective | 401/413 | 97.1 (95.0-98.3) | 223/234^ | 95.3 (91.8-97.4) |
| | Contrived | 11/11 | 100 (74.1-100) | 94/94 | 100 (96.1-100) |
| | Overall | 412/424 | 97.2 (95.1-98.4) | 317/328 | 96.6 (94.1-98.1) |
| | Prospective (Fresh) | 27/28 | 96.4 (82.3-99.4) | 34/37 | 91.9 (78.7-97.2) |
| | Prospective (Frozen) | 56/58 | 96.6 (88.3-99.0) | 43/43 | 100 (91.8-100) |
| mecA
Staphylococcus
aureus | Prospective (All) | 83/86 | 96.5 (90.2-98.8) | 77/80 | 96.3 (89.5-98.7) |
| | Retrospective | 107/108 | 99.1 (94.9-99.8) | 16/17 | 94.1 (73.0-99.0) |
| | Prospective/Retrospective | 190/194 | 97.9 (94.8-99.2) | 93/97 | 95.9 (89.9-98.4) |
| | Contrived | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | 49/49 | 100 (92.7-100) |
| | Overall | 200/204 | 98.0 (95.1-99.2) | 142/146 | 97.3 (93.2-98.9) |
| | Prospective (Fresh) | 36/36 | 100 (90.4-100) | 24/27 | 88.9 (71.9-96.1) |
| | Prospective (Frozen) | 41/43 | 95.3 (84.5-98.7) | 15/15 | 100 (79.6-100) |
| mecA
Staphylococcus
epidermidis | Prospective (All) | 77/79 | 97.5 (91.2-99.3) | 39/42 | 92.9 (81.0-97.5) |
| | Retrospective | 30/30 | 100 (88.6-100) | 43/49 | 87.5 (52.9-97.8) |
| | Prospective/Retrospective | 107/109 | 98.2 (93.6-99.5) | 46/50 | 92.0 (81.2-96.8) |
| | Contrived | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 0/0 | --- |
| | Overall | 108/110 | 98.2 (93.6-99.5) | 46/50 | 92.0 (81.2-96.8) |
| mecA
Staphylococcus
lugdunensis | Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| | Prospective (Frozen) | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| | Prospective (All) | 0/0 | --- | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| | Retrospective | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) |
| | Prospective/Retrospective | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 5/5 | 100 (56.6-100) |
| | Contrived | 0/0 | --- | 45/45 | 100 (92.1-100) |
| | Overall | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 50/50 | 100 (92.9-100) |
| Target | Sample Type | Sensitivity/PPA | | Specificity/NPA | |
| | | TP/TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TN/TN+FP | % (95% CI) |
| mecC
Staphylococcus | Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 182/182 | 100 (97.9-100) |
| | Prospective (Frozen) | 0/0 | --- | 274/274 | 100 (98.6-100) |
| | Prospective (All) | 0/0 | --- | 456/456 | 100 (99.2-100) |
| | Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 191/191 | 100 (98.0-100) |
| | Prospective/Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 647/647 | 100 (99.4-100) |
| | Contrived | 49/49 | 100 (92.7-100) | 56/56 | 100 (93.6-100) |
| | Overall | 49/49 | 100 (92.7-100) | 703/703 | 100 (99.5-100) |
| mecC
Staphylococcus
aureus | Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 65/65 | 100 (94.4-100) |
| | Prospective (Frozen) | 0/0 | --- | 101/101 | 100 (96.3-100) |
| | Prospective (All) | 0/0 | --- | 166/166 | 100 (97.7-100) |
| | Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 125/125 | 100 (97.0-100) |
| | Prospective/Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 291/291 | 100 (98.7-100) |
| | Contrived | 49/49 | 100 (92.7-100) | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) |
| | Overall | 49/49 | 100 (92.7-100) | 301/301 | 100 (98.7-100) |
| mecC
Staphylococcus
epidermidis | Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 63/63 | 100 (94.3-100) |
| | Prospective (Frozen) | 0/0 | --- | 58/58 | 100 (93.8-100) |
| | Prospective (All) | 0/0 | --- | 121/121 | 100 (96.9-100) |
| | Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 38/38 | 100 (90.8-100) |
| | Prospective/Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 159/159 | 100 (97.6-100) |
| | Contrived | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| | Overall | 0/0 | --- | 160/160 | 100 (97.7-100) |
| mecC
Staphylococcus
lugdunensis | Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| | Prospective (Frozen) | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| | Prospective (All) | 0/0 | --- | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| | Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) |
| | Prospective/Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) |
| | Contrived | 0/0 | --- | 45/45 | 100 (92.1-100) |
| | Overall | 0/0 | --- | 51/51 | 100 (93.0-100) |
mecA was detected in 4 of the 7 false positive samples that were tested with an FDA-cleared multiplex assay. A.
24
Table 27: Clinical Performance for mecC
25
Target | Sample Type | Sensitivity/PPA | Specificity/NPA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP/TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TN/TN+FP | % (95% CI) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vanA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enterococcus | Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 24/25 | 96.0 (80.5-99.3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prospective (Frozen) | 8/8 | 100 (67.6-100) | 28/28 | 100 (87.9-100) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prospective (All) | 8/8 | 100 (67.6-100) | 52/53 | 98.1 (90.1-99.7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retrospective | 53/57 | 93.0 (83.3-97.2) | 89/90 | 98.9 (94.0-99.8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prospective/Retrospective | 61/65A | 93.8 (85.2-97.6) | 141/143B | 98.6 (95.0-99.6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contrived | 60/60 | 100 (94.0-100) | 66/66 | 100 (94.5-100) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overall | 121/125 | 96.8 (92.1-98.7) | 207/209 | 99.0 (96.6-99.7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 21/21 | 100 (84.5-100) | Prospective (Frozen) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 27/27 | 100 (87.5-100) | Prospective (All) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 48/48 | 100 (92.6-100) | vanA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enterococcus faecalis | Retrospective | 11/14 | 78.6 (52.4-92.4) | 76/76 | 100 (95.2-100) | Prospective/Retrospective | 12/15 | 80.0 (54.8-93.0) | 124/124 | 100 (97.0-100) | Contrived | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | 42/42 | 100 (91.6-100) | Overall | 22/25 | 88.0 (70.0-95.8) | 166/166 | 100 (97.7-100) | Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 2/3 | 66.7 (20.8-93.9) | Prospective (Frozen) | 7/7 | 100 (64.6-100) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | Prospective (All) | 7/7 | 100 (64.6-100) | 4/5 | 80.0 (37.6-96.4) | vanA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enterococcus faecium | Retrospective | 44/44 | 100 (92.0-100) | 8/9 | 88.9 (56.5-98.0) | Prospective/Retrospective | 51/51 | 100 (93.0-100) | 12/14 | 85.7 (60.1-96.0) | Contrived | 50/50 | 100 (92.9-100) | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | Overall | 101/101 | 100 (96.3-100) | 22/24 | 91.7 (74.2-97.7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 21/21 | 100 (84.5-100) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prospective (Frozen) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 27/27 | 100 (87.5-100) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prospective (All) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 48/48 | 100 (92.6-100) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vanA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enterococcus faecalis | Retrospective | 11/14 | 78.6 (52.4-92.4) | 76/76 | 100 (95.2-100) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prospective/Retrospective | 12/15 | 80.0 (54.8-93.0) | 124/124 | 100 (97.0-100) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contrived | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | 42/42 | 100 (91.6-100) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overall | 22/25 | 88.0 (70.0-95.8) | 166/166 | 100 (97.7-100) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 2/3 | 66.7 (20.8-93.9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prospective (Frozen) | 7/7 | 100 (64.6-100) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prospective (All) | 7/7 | 100 (64.6-100) | 4/5 | 80.0 (37.6-96.4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vanA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enterococcus faecium | Retrospective | 44/44 | 100 (92.0-100) | 8/9 | 88.9 (56.5-98.0) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prospective/Retrospective | 51/51 | 100 (93.0-100) | 12/14 | 85.7 (60.1-96.0) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contrived | 50/50 | 100 (92.9-100) | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overall | 101/101 | 100 (96.3-100) | 22/24 | 91.7 (74.2-97.7) |
Table 28: Clinical Performance for vanA
A. vanA was not detected in 1 false negative sample using an FDA-cleared multiplex assay.
B. vanA was detected in the 1 false positive sample that was tested using an FDA-cleared multiplex assay.
26
Target | Sample Type | Sensitivity/PPA | Specificity/NPA | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP/TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TN/TN+FP | % (95% CI) | ||
vanB | |||||
Enterococcus | Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 25/25 | 100 (86.7-100) |
Prospective (Frozen) | 0/0 | --- | 36/36 | 100 (90.4-100) | |
Prospective (All) | 0/0 | --- | 61/61 | 100 (94.1-100) | |
Retrospective | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 146/146 | 100 (97.4-100) | |
Prospective/Retrospective | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 207/207 | 100 (98.2-100) | |
Contrived | 52/52 | 100 (93.1-100) | 74/74 | 100 (95.1-100) | |
Overall | 53/53 | 100 (93.2-100) | 281/281 | 100 (98.7-100) | |
vanB | |||||
Enterococcus faecalis | Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 21/21 | 100 (84.5-100) |
Prospective (Frozen) | 0/0 | --- | 28/28 | 100 (87.9-100) | |
Prospective (All) | 0/0 | --- | 49/49 | 100 (92.7-100) | |
Retrospective | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 89/89 | 100 (95.9-100) | |
Prospective/Retrospective | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 138/138 | 100 (97.3-100) | |
Contrived | 42/42 | 100 (91.6-100) | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | |
Overall | 43/43 | 100 (91.8-100) | 148/148 | 100 (97.5-100) | |
vanB | |||||
Enterococcus faecium | Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) |
Prospective (Frozen) | 0/0 | --- | 9/9 | 100 (70.1-100) | |
Prospective (All) | 0/0 | --- | 12/12 | 100 (75.8-100) | |
Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 53/53 | 100 (93.2-100) | |
Prospective/Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 65/65 | 100 (94.4-100) | |
Contrived | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | 50/50 | 100 (92.9-100) | |
Overall | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | 115/115 | 100 (96.8-100) |
Table 29: Clinical Performance for vanB
Pan Targets
In addition to the evaluable prospective and retrospective samples that contain gram-positive organisms, the clinical performance of the Pan Candida and Pan Gram-Negative targets was evaluated by testing an additional 480 non-intended use retrospective samples with gramnegative or fungal organisms; these are denoted as Retrospective (Non-Intended Use) samples. Results from those samples are summarized in Table 30.
27
| Target | Sample Type | TP/TP+FN | Sensitivity/PPA
% (95% CI) | TN/TN+FP | Specificity/NPA
% (95% CI) |
|-------------------|----------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------|
| Pan Candida | Prospective (Fresh) | 0/0 | --- | 312/312 | 100 (98.8-100) |
| | Prospective (Frozen) | 0/0 | --- | 399/399 | 100 (99.0-100) |
| | Prospective (All) | 0/0 | --- | 711/711 | 100 (99.5-100) |
| | Retrospective | 7/9 | 77.8 (45.3-93.7) | 576/577 | 99.8 (99.0-100) |
| | Retrospective (Non-Intended Use) | 90/96 | 93.8 (87.0-97.1) | 383/384A | 99.7 (98.5-100) |
| | Contrived | 0/0 | --- | 565/565 | 100 (99.3-100) |
| Pan Gram-Negative | Prospective (Fresh) | 10/11 | 90.9 (62.3-98.4) | 299/301 | 99.3 (97.6-99.8) |
| | Prospective (Frozen) | 12/12 | 100 (75.8-100) | 386/387 | 99.7 (98.6-100) |
| | Prospective (All) | 22/23 | 95.7 (79.0-99.2) | 685/688B | 99.6 (98.7-99.9) |
| | Retrospective | 36/43 | 83.7 (70.0-91.9) | 540/543C | 99.4 (98.4-99.8) |
| | Retrospective (Non-Intended Use) | 364/375 | 97.1 (94.8-98.4) | 104/105 | 99.0 (94.8-99.8) |
| | Contrived | 0/0 | --- | 565/565 | 100 (99.3-100) |
Table 30: Clinical Performance for Pan Targets
A. Candida glabrata was detected in 1/1 false positive samples using PCR/sequencing.
A gram-negative organism, Klebsiella pneumoniae, was detected in 1/3 false positive samples using PCR sequencing. B.
C. A gram-negative organism, Escherichia coli, was detected in 1/3 false positive samples using PCR/sequencing.
Table 31: Contrived Sample Summary
| Target | Organism | Strain | Independent Contrived
Samples Tested |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Bacillus cereus
group | Bacillus cereus | ATCC 10876 | 11 |
| | | ATCC 21769 | 10 |
| | | ATCC 31430 | 9 |
| | | ATCC 53522 | 10 |
| | Bacillus thuringiensis | ATCC 33679 | 1 |
| | | ATCC 10792 | 2 |
| | | ATCC 55173 | 3 |
| | Bacillus cereus group total | | 46 |
| Bacillus subtilis
group | Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | ATCC 23350 | 3 |
| | | ATCC 23845 | 4 |
| | | ATCC 53495 | 3 |
| | Bacillus atrophaeus | ATCC 51189 | 4 |
| | | ATCC 6455 | 3 |
| | | ATCC 6537 | 4 |
| | Bacillus licheniformis | ATCC 21039 | 3 |
| | | ATCC 21667 | 3 |
| | | ATCC 53926 | 4 |
| | Bacillus subtilis | ATCC 15040 | 5 |
| | | ATCC 15561 | 8 |
| | | ATCC 55614 | 6 |
| | Bacillus subtilis group total | | 50 |
| Corynebacterium | Corynebacterium coyleae | ATCC 700219 | 7 |
| | Corynebacterium falsenii | ATCC BAA-596 | 9 |
| | Corynebacterium striatum | ATCC BAA-1293 | 4 |
| | Corynebacterium total | | 20 |
| Target | Organism | Strain | Independent Contrived
Samples Tested |
| Enterococcus | Enterococcus faecalis, vanA | JMI 876745 | 10 |
| | | ATCC 51299 | 11 |
| | | ATCC 51575 | 11 |
| | Enterococcus faecalis, vanB | ATCC 700802 | 10 |
| | | ATCC BAA-2365 | 10 |
| | | ATCC 51559 | 4 |
| | Enterococcus faecium, vanA | ATCC 700221 | 3 |
| | | ATCC BAA-2316 | 5 |
| | | ATCC BAA-2317 | 3 |
| | | ATCC BAA-2318 | 5 |
| | | ATCC BAA-2319 | 5 |
| | | ATCC BAA-2320 | 3 |
| | | LMC 002867 | 3 |
| | | LMC 003921 | 4 |
| | | LMC 032261 | 4 |
| | | LMC 055971 | 3 |
| | | LMC 103676 | 5 |
| | | LMC 104266 | 3 |
| | Enterococcus faecium, vanB | ATCC 51858 | 10 |
| | Enterococcus flavescens | ATCC 49996 | 3 |
| | Enterococcus gallinarum | ATCC 49610
ATCC 700425 | 1
3 |
| | Enterococcus hirae | ATCC 10541 | 1 |
| | Enterococcus malodoratus | ATCC 43197 | 3 |
| | Enterococcus raffinosus | ATCC 49464 | 2 |
| | Enterococcus saccharolyticus | ATCC 43076 | 1 |
| | Enterococcus total | | 126 |
| Lactobacillus | Lactobacillus casei | ATCC 25598 | 2 |
| | | ATCC 334 | 6 |
| | | ATCC 39392 | 4 |
| | | 148-260 * | 3 |
| | Lactobacillus paracasei | ATCC 27092 | 2 |
| | | ATCC BAA-52 | 6 |
| | | ATCC 39595 | 3 |
| | | ATCC 53103 | 5 |
| | Lactobacillus rhamnosus | ATCC 55915 | 2 |
| | Lactobacillus total | | 33 |
| Listeria | Listeria innocua | ATCC 33090
NCTC 11288 | 4
5 |
| | Listeria ivanovii | ATCC 19119
ATCC 700402
ATCC BAA-139 | 2
4
4 |
| | Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 13932 | 5 |
| | | ATCC 19111 | 3 |
| | | ATCC 19112 | 4 |
| | | ATCC 19114 | 5 |
| | | ATCC 19116 | 5 |
| | | ATCC 19117 | 5 |
| | | ATCC 19118 | 5 |
| | | ATCC 7644 | 5 |
| | | ATCC BAA-751 | 5 |
| | | NCTC 10890 | 4 |
| Target | Organism | Strain | Independent Contrived
Samples Tested |
| | Listeria seeligeri | ATCC 35967 | 5 |
| | Listeria welshimeri | ATCC 35897 | 5 |
| | Listeria total | | 75 |
| Micrococcus | Micrococcus luteus | ATCC 10240 | 3 |
| | | ATCC 19212 | 3 |
| | | ATCC 400 | 3 |
| | | ATCC 4698 | 3 |
| | | ATCC 49732 | 3 |
| | | ATCC 53598 | 4 |
| | Micrococcus lylae | ATCC 27566 | 4 |
| | Micrococcus yunnanensis | ATCC 7468 | 4 |
| | Micrococcus total | | 27 |
| Cutibacterium
acnes | Cutibacterium acnes | ATCC 11827 | 8 |
| | | ATCC 11828 | 6 |
| | | ATCC 33179 | 4 |
| | | ATCC 6919 | 8 |
| | Cutibacterium acnes total | | 26 |
| Staphylococcus | Staphylococcus aureus, mecA | ATCC 33591 | 3 |
| | | ATCC BAA-44 | 5 |
| | | NCTC 12493 | 2 |
| | Staphylococcus aureus, mecC | ATCC BAA-2312 | 23 |
| | | ATCC BAA-2313 | 26 |
| | Staphylococcus epidermidis, mecA | ATCC 35984 | 1 |
| | | ATCC 49576 | 9 |
| | Staphylococcus lugdunensis | NRS 878 | 9 |
| | | NRS 879 | 9 |
| | | NRS 880 | 9 |
| | | NRS 881 | 9 |
| | Staphylococcus total | | 105 |
| Streptococcus | Streptococcus agalactiae | ATCC 12403 | 2 |
| | | ATCC 12973 | 2 |
| | | ATCC 13813 | 2 |
| | | ATCC 27956 | 2 |
| | Streptococcus anginosus | ATCC 700231 | 5 |
| | | ATCC 9895 | 3 |
| | | NCTC 10713 | 5 |
| | Streptococcus constellatus | ATCC 27513 | 4 |
| | | ATCC 27823 | 2 |
| | Streptococcus intermedius | ATCC 27335 | 4 |
| | Streptococcus pyogenes | ATCC 12344 | 5 |
| | | ATCC 12384 | 4 |
| | | ATCC 14289 | 4 |
| | | ATCC 19615 | 4 |
| | | ATCC 49399 | 5 |
| | | NCIMB 13285 | 4 |
28
29
*Derived from clinical specimen
30
Genus and Group Assay Species Stratification
The ePlex BCID-GP Panel reports genus or group level results for Bacillus cereus group, Bacillus subtilis group, Corynebacterium, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Listeria, Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Streptococcus anginosus group, Pan Gram-Negative and Pan Candida targets. Sensitivity/PPA of these genus and group level targets for species as determined by comparator methods for all evaluable samples tested are summarized in Table 32.
| Target | Sensitivity/PPA
(Prospective) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Retrospective) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Contrived) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Combined) | |
|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|------------------|------------------------------------|------------------|--------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------|------------------|
| Species detected by
Comparator Method | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) |
| Bacillus cereus group | 5/5 | 100 (56.6-100) | 6/7 | 85.7 (48.7-97.4) | 46/46 | 100 (92.3-100) | 57/58 | 98.3 (90.9-99.7) |
| Bacillus cereus | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | 6/7 | 85.7 (48.7-97.4) | 40/40 | 100 (91.2-100) | 49/50 | 98.0 (89.5-99.6) |
| Bacillus thuringiensis | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | - | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) | 8/8 | 100 (67.6-100) |
| Bacillus subtilis group | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | - | 50/50 | 100 (92.9-100) | 52/52 | 100 (93.1-100) |
| Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | 11/11 | 100 (74.1-100) |
| Bacillus atrophaeus | - | - | - | - | 11/11 | 100 (74.1-100) | 11/11 | 100 (74.1-100) |
| Bacillus licheniformis | - | - | - | - | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) |
| Bacillus subtilis | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 19/19 | 100 (83.2-100) | 20/20 | 100 (83.9-100) |
| Corynebacterium | 13/19 | 68.4 (46.0-84.6) | 27/32 | 84.4 (68.2-93.1) | 20/20 | 100 (83.9-100) | 60/71 | 84.5 (74.3-91.1) |
| Corynebacterium | 4/9 | 44.4 (18.9-73.3) | 5/7 | 71.4 (35.9-91.8) | - | - | 9/16 | 56.3 (33.2-76.9) |
| Corynebacterium afermentans | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | - | - | 3/4 | 75.0 (30.1-95.4) |
| Corynebacterium amycolatum | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Corynebacterium
aurimucosum | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| Corynebacterium casei | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Corynebacterium coyleae | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 7/7 | 100 (64.6-100) | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) |
| Corynebacterium falsenii | - | - | - | - | 9/9 | 100 (70.1-100) | 9/9 | 100 (70.1-100) |
| Corynebacterium imitans | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | - | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) |
| Corynebacterium jeikeium | - | - | 4/5 | 80.0 (37.6-96.4) | - | - | 4/5 | 80.0 (37.6-96.4) |
| Corynebacterium
kroppenstedtii | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Corynebacterium matruchotii | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Corynebacterium mucifaciens | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | - | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) |
| Corynebacterium
pseudotuberculosis | - | - | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | - | - | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) |
| Corynebacterium striatum | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 11/11 | 100 (74.1-100) |
| Corynebacterium
tuberculostearicum | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Corynebacterium urealyticum | - | - | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | - | - | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) |
| Target
Species detected by
Comparator Method | Sensitivity/PPA
(Prospective) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Retrospective) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Contrived) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Combined) | |
| | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) |
| Enterococcus | 61/61 | 100 (94.1-100) | 139/147 | 94.6 (89.6-97.2) | 126/126 | 100 (97.0-100) | 326/334 | 97.6 (95.3-98.8) |
| Enterococcus avium | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 2/3 | 66.7 (20.8-93.9) | - | - | 3/4 | 75.0 (30.1-95.4) |
| Enterococcus casseliflavus | - | - | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | - | - | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) |
| Enterococcus casseliflavus /
gallinarum | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Enterococcus faecalis | 49/49 | 100 (92.7-100) | 85/90 | 94.4 (87.6-97.6) | 52/52 | 100 (93.1-100) | 186/191 | 97.4 (94.0-98.9) |
| Enterococcus faecium | 12/12 | 100 (75.8-100) | 52/53 | 98.1 (90.1-99.7) | 60/60 | 100 (94.0-100) | 124/125 | 99.2 (95.6-99.9) |
| Enterococcus flavescens | - | - | - | - | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) |
| Enterococcus gallinarum | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) |
| Enterococcus hirae | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Enterococcus malodoratus | - | - | - | - | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) |
| Enterococcus raffinosus | - | - | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| Enterococcus saccharolyticus | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Lactobacillus | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 9/9 | 100 (70.1-100) | 32/33 | 97.0 (84.7-99.5) | 45/46 | 97.8 (88.7-99.6) |
| Lactobacillus casei | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 12/12 | 100 (75.8-100) | 13/13 | 100 (77.2-100) |
| Lactobacillus paracasei | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 11/11 | 100 (74.1-100) | 12/12 | 100 (75.8-100) |
| Lactobacillus rhamnosus | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 8/8 | 100 (67.6-100) | 9/10 | 90.0 (59.6-98.2) | 19/20 | 95.0 (76.4-99.1) |
| Lactobacillus zeae | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Listeria | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 74/75 | 98.7 (92.8-99.8) | 76/77 | 98.7 (93.0-99.8) |
| Listeria innocua | - | - | - | - | 9/9 | 100 (70.1-100) | 9/9 | 100 (70.1-100) |
| Listeria ivanovii | - | - | - | - | 9/10 | 90.0 (59.6-98.2) | 9/10 | 90.0 (59.6-98.2) |
| Listeria monocytogenes | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 46/46 | 100 (92.3-100) | 48/48 | 100 (92.6-100) |
| Listeria seeligeri | - | - | - | - | 5/5 | 100 (56.6-100) | 5/5 | 100 (56.6-100) |
| Listeria welshimeri | - | - | - | - | 5/5 | 100 (56.6-100) | 5/5 | 100 (56.6-100) |
| Micrococcus | 19/21 | 90.5 (71.1-97.3) | 20/23 | 87.0 (67.9-95.5) | 27/27 | 100 (87.5-100) | 66/71 | 93.0 (84.6-97.0) |
| Micrococcus | 8/9 | 88.9 (56.5-98.0) | 10/13 | 76.9 (49.7-91.8) | - | - | 18/22 | 81.8 (61.5-92.7) |
| Micrococcus luteus | 9/9 | 100 (70.1-100) | 8/8 | 100 (67.6-100) | 19/19 | 100 (83.2-100) | 36/36 | 100 (90.4-100) |
| Micrococcus luteus/lylae | 2/3 | 66.7 (20.8-93.9) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | - | 4/5 | 80.0 (37.6-96.4) |
| Micrococcus lylae | - | - | - | - | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) |
| Micrococcus yunnanensis | - | - | - | - | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) |
| Target | Sensitivity/PPA
(Prospective) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Retrospective) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Contrived) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Combined) | |
| Species detected by
Comparator Method | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | ТР/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | ТР/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) |
| Staphylococcus | 447/456 | 98.0 (96.3-99.0) | 185/191 | 96.9 (93.3-98.6) | 105/105 | 100 (96.5-100) | 7371752 | 98.0 (96.7-98.8) |
| Coagulase-negative
staphylococci (CoNS) | 18/18 | 100 (82.4-100) | | | | | 18/18 | 100 (82.4-100) |
| CoNS (Not S. epidermidis, S.
lugdunensis) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | | - | | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| Staphylococcus | 74/78 | 94.9 (87.5-98.0) | 1/3 | 33.3 (6.1-79.2) | - | | 75/81 | 92.6 (84.8-96.6) |
| Staphylococcus aureus | 158/160 | 98.8 (95.6-99.7) | 121/123 | 98.4 (94.3-99.6) | રતેન્દિતે | 100 (93.9-100) | 338/342 | 98.8 (97.0-99.5) |
| Staphylococcus aureus subsp.
aureus | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | | 8/8 | 100 (67.6-100) |
| Staphylococcus auricularis | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) |
| Staphylococcus capitis | 14/14 | 100 (78.5-100) | 7/7 | 100 (64.6-100) | - | | 21/21 | 100 (84.5-100) |
| Staphylococcus carnosus
subsp. carnosus | | | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | - | | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) |
| Staphylococcus cohnii | 1/2 | 50.0 (9.5-90.5) | | | - | | 1/2 | 50.0 (9.5-90.5) |
| Staphylococcus epidermidis | 117/121 | 96.7 (91.8-98.7) | 37/38 | 97.4 (86.5-99.5) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 155/160 | 96.9 (92.9-98.7) |
| Staphylococcus haemolyticus | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | | 8/8 | 100 (67.6-100) |
| Staphylococcus hominis | 24/24 | 100 (86.2-100) | 13/13 | 100 (77.2-100) | - | | 37/37 | 100 (90.6-100) |
| Staphylococcus hominis subsp.
hominis | 22/22 | 100 (85.1-100) | ર્ટાર | 100 (56.6-100) | - | | 27/27 | 100 (87.5-100) |
| Staphylococcus hominis subsp.
novobiosepticus | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | | | - | | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Staphylococcus lugdunensis | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 45/45 | 100 (92.1-100) | રી/રી | 100 (93.0-100) |
| Staphylococcus pettenkoferi | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | | - | | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| Staphylococcus
saccharolyticus | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | | - | | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Staphylococcus saprophyticus | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| Staphylococcus schleiferi | - | | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Staphylococcus simulans | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | - | | | | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) |
| Staphylococcus warneri | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | | | | | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) |
| Target | Sensitivity/PPA
(Prospective) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Retrospective) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Contrived) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Combined) | |
| Species detected by
Comparator Method | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) |
| Streptococcus | 103/110 | 93.6 (87.4-96.9) | 171/173 | 98.8 (95.9-99.7) | 57/57 | 100 (93.7-100) | 331/340 | 97.4 (95.0-98.6) |
| Alpha Hemolytic
Streptococcus | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Gamma Hemolytic
Streptococcus | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Streptococcus | 5/7 | 71.4 (35.9-91.8) | - | - | - | - | 5/7 | 71.4 (35.9-91.8) |
| Streptococcus (Group G) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Streptococcus agalactiae | 10/11 | 90.9 (62.3-98.4) | 37/37 | 100 (90.6-100) | 8/8 | 100 (67.6-100) | 55/56 | 98.2 (90.6-99.7) |
| Streptococcus anginosus | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 13/13 | 100 (77.2-100) | 13/13 | 100 (77.2-100) | 27/27 | 100 (87.5-100) |
| Streptococcus anginosus
group | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 22/22 | 100 (85.1-100) | - | - | 26/26 | 100 (87.1-100) |
| Streptococcus bovis | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| Streptococcus bovis group | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Streptococcus constellatus | - | - | - | - | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) |
| Streptococcus constellatus
subsp. constellatus | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| Streptococcus constellatus
subsp. pharyngis | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Streptococcus dysgalactiae | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| Streptococcus dysgalactiae
(Group G) | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 5/5 | 100 (56.6-100) |
| Streptococcus gallolyticus | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Streptococcus gordonii | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Streptococcus infantarius | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Streptococcus intermedius | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) |
| Streptococcus mitis | 9/10 | 90.0 (59.6-98.2) | 14/15 | 93.3 (70.2-98.8) | - | - | 23/25 | 92.0 (75.0-97.8) |
| Streptococcus mitis group | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | - | - | - | - | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) |
| Streptococcus mutans | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Streptococcus oralis | - | - | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | - | - | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) |
| Streptococcus parasanguinis | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | - | - | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae | 28/28 | 100 (87.9-100) | 41/41 | 100 (91.4-100) | - | - | 69/69 | 100 (94.7-100) |
| Streptococcus pyogenes | 8/8 | 100 (67.6-100) | 19/20 | 95.0 (76.4-99.1) | 26/26 | 100 (87.1-100) | 53/54 | 98.1 (90.2-99.7) |
| Streptococcus salivarius | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 5/5 | 100 (56.6-100) | - | - | 9/9 | 100 (70.1-100) |
| Streptococcus vestibularis | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Streptococcus viridans group | 14/17 | 82.4 (59.0-93.8) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | - | 16/19 | 84.2 (62.4-94.5) |
| Streptococcus anginosus group | 4/5 | 80.0 (37.6-96.4) | 38/40 | 95.0 (83.5-98.6) | 23/23 | 100 (85.7-100) | 65/68 | 95.6 (87.8-98.5) |
| Streptococcus anginosus | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | 12/13 | 92.3 (66.7-98.6) | 13/13 | 100 (77.2-100) | 25/27 | 92.6 (76.6-97.9) |
| Streptococcus anginosus group | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 21/22 | 95.5 (78.2-99.2) | - | - | 25/26 | 96.2 (81.1-99.3) |
| Streptococcus constellatus | - | - | - | - | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) |
| Streptococcus constellatus spp
constellatus | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| Streptococcus constellatus spp
pharynges | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Streptococcus intermedius | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) |
| Target
Species detected by
Comparator Method | Sensitivity/PPA
(Prospective) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Retrospective) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Contrived) | | Sensitivity/PPA
(Combined) | |
| | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TP/
TP+FN | % (95% CI) |
| Pan Candida | - | - | 7/9 | 77.8 (45.3-93.7) | - | - | 7/9 | 77.8 (45.3-93.7) |
| Candida albicans | - | - | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | - | - | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) |
| Candida glabrata | - | - | 1/2 | 50 (9.5-90.5) | - | - | 1/2 | 50 (9.5-90.5) |
| Candida krusei | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Candida parapsilosis | - | - | 1/2 | 50 (9.5-90.5) | - | - | 1/2 | 50 (9.5-90.5) |
| Pan Gram-Negative | 22/23 | 95.7 (79.0-99.2) | 36/43 | 83.7 (70.0-91.9) | - | - | 58/66 | 87.9 (77.9-93.7) |
| Acinetobacter baumannii | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | 2/4 | 50.0 (15.0-85.0) | - | - | 5/7 | 71.4 (35.9-91.8) |
| Acinetobacter lwoffii | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Aeromonas caviae | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Bacteroides fragilis | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | - | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| Campylobacter gracilis | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | - | - | - | - | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) |
| Citrobacter braakii | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Citrobacter freundii | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Citrobacter koseri | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Enterobacter aerogenes | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Enterobacter cloacae | - | - | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | - | - | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) |
| Escherichia coli | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 14/14 | 100 (78.5-100) | - | - | 18/18 | 100 (82.4-100) |
| Klebsiella oxytoca | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | - | - | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 4/5 | 80.0 (37.6-96.4) | - | - | 8/9 | 88.9 (56.5-98.0) |
| Moraxella (Branhamella)
catarrhalis | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Moraxella catarrhalis | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Morganella morganii | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| Pediococcus pentosaceus | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Proteus mirabilis | 5/5 | 100 (56.6-100) | 4/5 | 80.0 (37.6-96.4) | - | - | 9/10 | 90.0 (59.6-98.2) |
| Proteus vulgaris | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Providencia stuartii | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | - | - | 1/2 | 50.0 (9.5-90.5) |
| Pseudomonas | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 1/2 | 50.0 (9.5-90.5) | - | - | 2/3 | 66.7 (20.8-93.9) |
| Serratia marcescens | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | - | - | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) |
| Veillonella species | - | - | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | - | - | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) |
| Non-fermenting gram-
negative bacilli | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | - | - | - | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
Table 32: Species Detected in Genus and Group Assays by Comparator Methods
31
32
33
34
35
Resistance Gene Assay Species Stratification
Test results for resistance genes are only reported when an associated organism assay is positive in the same sample. See Table 33 for organisms specifically associated with the four resistance markers on the ePlex BCID-GP Panel.
Table 33: Resistance Marker Organism Associations
| Resistance Gene
Result | Associated Targets |
---|---|
mecA and/or mecC | Any Staphylococcus assay ( Staphylococcus , S. aureus , S. epidermidis , S. lugdunensis ) |
vanA and/or vanB | Any Enterococcus assay ( Enterococcus , E. faecalis , E. faecium ) |
mecA/mecC
The PPA and NPA of the BCID-GP Panel mecA target stratified by the Staphylococcus species identified by comparator methods for prospective, retrospective and contrived samples are shown in Table 34.
Table 34: Clinical Performance of mecA Target by Staphylococcus Species Detected by
Comparator Methods
Species detected by Comparator Method | Sensitivity/PPA | Specificity/NPA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coagulase-negative | ||||||
Staphylococci (CoNS) | Prospective | 12/12 | 100 (75.8-100) | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) | |
Retrospective | - | - | - | - | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 12/12 | 100 (75.8-100) | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) | ||
CoNS (not S. epidermidis / | ||||||
S. lugdunensis) | Prospective | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | |
Retrospective | - | - | - | - | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | ||
Staphylococcus | Prospective | 49/52 | 94.2 (84.4-98.0) | 24/26 | 92.3 (75.9-97.9) | |
Retrospective | 1/2 | 50.0 (9.5-90.5) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 50/54 | 92.6 (82.4-97.1) | 25/27 | 92.6 (76.6-97.9) | ||
Staphylococcus aureus | Prospective | 80/83 | 96.4 (89.9-98.8) | 74/77 | 96.1 (89.2-98.7) | |
Retrospective | 105/106 | 99.1 (94.8-99.8) | 16/17 | 94.1 (73.0-99.0) | ||
Contrived | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | 49/49 | 100 (92.7-100) | ||
Combined | 195/199 | 98.0 (94.9-99.2) | 139/143 | 97.2 (93.0-98.9) | ||
Sensitivity/PPA | Specificity/NPA | |||||
Species detected by Comparator Method | TP/TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TN/TN+FP | % (95% CI) | ||
Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus | Prospective | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | |
Retrospective | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 0/0 | - | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 5/5 | 100 (56.6-100) | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | ||
Staphylococcus auricularis | Prospective | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | |
Retrospective | 0/0 | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | ||
Staphylococcus capitis | Prospective | 4/5 | 80.0 (37.6-96.4) | 5/5 | 100 (56.6-100) | |
Retrospective | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 7/7 | 100 (64.6-100) | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 8/9 | 88.9 (56.5-98.0) | 12/12 | 100 (75.8-100) | ||
Staphylococcus carnosus subsp. carnosus | Prospective | - | - | - | - | |
Retrospective | 0/0 | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 0/0 | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | ||
Staphylococcus cohnii | Prospective | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | |
Retrospective | - | - | - | - | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | ||
Staphylococcus epidermidis | Prospective | 77/79 | 97.5 (91.2-99.3) | 39/42 | 92.9 (81.0-97.5) | |
Retrospective | 30/30 | 100 (88.6-100) | 7/8 | 87.5 (52.9-97.8) | ||
Contrived | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 0/0 | - | ||
Combined | 108/110 | 98.2 (93.6-99.5) | 46/50 | 92.0 (81.2-96.8) | ||
Staphylococcus haemolyticus | Prospective | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | |
Retrospective | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 0/0 | - | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | ||
Staphylococcus hominis | Prospective | 12/13 | 92.3 (66.7-98.6) | 10/11 | 90.9 (62.3-98.4) | |
Retrospective | 12/12 | 100 (75.8-100) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 24/25 | 96.0 (80.5-99.3) | 11/12 | 91.7 (64.6-98.5) | ||
Staphylococcus hominis subsp. hominis | Prospective | 10/11 | 90.9 (62.3-98.4) | 11/11 | 100 (74.1-100) | |
Retrospective | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 12/13 | 92.3 (66.7-98.6) | 14/14 | 100 (78.5-100) | ||
Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus | Prospective | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 0/0 | - | |
Retrospective | - | - | - | - | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 0/0 | - | ||
Species detected by Comparator Method | Sensitivity/PPA | Specificity/NPA | ||||
TP/TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TN/TN+FP | % (95% CI) | |||
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | Prospective | 0/0 | --- | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | |
Retrospective | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | ||
Contrived | 0/0 | --- | 45/45 | 100 (92.1-100) | ||
Combined | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 50/50 | 100 (92.9-100) | ||
Staphylococcus pettenkoferi | Prospective | 0/0 | --- | 1/2 | 50.0 (9.5-90.5) | |
Retrospective | - | - | - | - | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 0/0 | --- | 1/2 | 50.0 (9.5-90.5) | ||
Staphylococcus saccharolyticus | Prospective | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | |
Retrospective | - | - | - | - | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | ||
Staphylococcus saprophyticus | Prospective | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 0/0 | --- | |
Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | ||
Staphylococcus schleiferi | Prospective | - | - | - | - | |
Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | ||
Staphylococcus simulans | Prospective | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | |
Retrospective | - | - | - | - | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | ||
Staphylococcus warneri | Prospective | 0/0 | --- | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | |
Retrospective | - | - | - | - | ||
Contrived | - | - | - | - | ||
Combined | 0/0 | --- | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) |
36
37
38
A comparison of specific Staphylococcus species and mecA identified by comparator methods versus the ePlex BCID-GP Panel results are shown in Table 36 for prospective and retrospective samples.
Table 35: Distribution of mecA Results in Staphylococcus aureus Prospective/Retrospective Samples
Comparator Method | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCID-GP | Org+/ARG+ | Org+/ARG- | Org- | Total | ||
Org+/ARG+ | 190 | 2 | 2 | 194 | ||
Org+/ARG- | വ | 88 | ব | 94 | ||
Org- | 2 | 7 | 1000 | 1009 | ||
Total | 1006 | |||||
1297 | ||||||
194 | ||||||
97 | ||||||
% Agreement (95% CI) for Org+/ARG+: 190/194=97.9 (94.8-99.2) | ||||||
% Agreement (95% CI) for Org+/ARG-: 88/97=90.7 (83.3-95.0) |
| % Agreement (95% CI) for Org-: 1000/1006=99.4 (98.7-99.7)
Table 36: Distribution of mecA Results in Staphylococcus Species (Excluding Known S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. lugdunensis) Prospective/Retrospective Samples
Comparator Method | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
BCID-GP | Org+/ARG+ | Org+/ARG- | Org- | Total |
Org+/ARG+ | 33 | 1 | 4 | 38 |
Org+/ARG- | 3 | 45 | 8 | 56 |
Org- | 10* | 4 | 1091 | 1105 |
Total | 46 | 50 | 1103 | 1199 |
% Agreement (95% CI) for Org+/ARG+: 33/46=71.7 (57.5-82.7) | ||||
% Agreement (95% CI) for Org+/ARG-: 45/50=90.0 (78.6-95.7) | ||||
% Agreement (95% CI) for Org-: 1091/1103=98.9 (98.1-99.4) |
- 10 samples had a Staphylococcus species (not S. epidermidis, or S. lugdunensis) with mecA identified by comparator methods, whereas ePlex BCID-GP Panel detected S. epidermidis with mecA.
A table for mecC is not provided because mecC was only detected in a single species,
Staphylococcus aureus. In the 49 contrived samples with Staphylococcus aureus containing
mecC, the resulting PPA and NPA were both 100%.
39
vanA/vanB
The PPA and NPA of the BCID-GP Panel vanA target stratified by the Enterococcus species identified by comparator methods for 208 clinical prospective samples and 126 contrived samples are shown in Table 37.
A table for vanB is not provided because vanB was only detected in 53 samples comprised of two species, E. faecalis (n=43) and E. faecium (n=10), resulting in PPA and NPA of 100%.
Species detected by Comparator Method | Sensitivity/PPA | Specificity/NPA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP/TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TN/TN+FP | % (95% CI) | ||
Enterococcus | Prospective | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
Retrospective | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
Contrived | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
Combined | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | |
Enterococcus avium | Prospective | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
Retrospective | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | |
Contrived | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
Combined | 0/1 | 0.0 (0.0-79.3) | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | |
Enterococcus casseliflavus | Prospective | --- | --- | --- | --- |
Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | |
Contrived | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
Combined | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | |
Enterococcus casseliflavus / | |||||
E. gallinarum | Prospective | --- | --- | --- | --- |
Retrospective | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | |
Contrived | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
Combined | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | |
Enterococcus faecalis | Prospective | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | 48/48 | 100 (92.6-100) |
Retrospective | 11/14 | 78.6 (52.4-92.4) | 76/76 | 100 (95.2-100) | |
Contrived | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | 42/42 | 100 (91.6-100) | |
Combined | 22/25 | 88.0 (70.0-95.8) | 166/166 | 100 (97.7-100) | |
Enterococcus faecium | Prospective | 7/7 | 100 (64.6-100) | 4/5 | 80.0 (37.6-96.4) |
Retrospective | 44/44 | 100 (92.0-100) | 8/9 | 88.9 (56.5-98.0) | |
Contrived | 50/50 | 100 (92.9-100) | 10/10 | 100 (72.2-100) | |
Combined | 101/101 | 100 (96.3-100) | 22/24 | 91.7 (74.2-97.7) | |
Enterococcus flavescens | Prospective | --- | --- | --- | --- |
Retrospective | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
Contrived | 0/0 | --- | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | |
Combined | 0/0 | --- | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) |
Table 37: Clinical Performance of vanA Target by Enterococcus Species Detected by Comparator Methods
40
Species detected by Comparator Method | Sensitivity/PPA | Specificity/NPA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP/TP+FN | % (95% CI) | TN/TN+FP | % (95% CI) | ||
Enterococcus gallinarum | Prospective | - | - | - | - |
Retrospective | 0/0 | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | |
Contrived | 0/0 | --- | 4/4 | 100 (51.0-100) | |
Combined | 0/0 | - | 6/6 | 100 (61.0-100) | |
Enterococcus hirae | Prospective | - | - | - | - |
Retrospective | - | - | - | - | |
Contrived | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | |
Combined | 0/0 | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | |
Enterococcus malodoratus | Prospective | - | - | - | - |
Retrospective | - | - | - | - | |
Contrived | 0/0 | --- | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | |
Combined | 0/0 | - | 3/3 | 100 (43.9-100) | |
Enterococcus raffinosus | Prospective | - | - | - | - |
Retrospective | - | - | - | - | |
Contrived | 0/0 | --- | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | |
Combined | 0/0 | - | 2/2 | 100 (34.2-100) | |
Enterococcus saccharolyticus | Prospective | - | - | - | - |
Retrospective | - | - | - | - | |
Contrived | 0/0 | --- | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) | |
Combined | 0/0 | - | 1/1 | 100 (20.7-100) |
41
A comparison of Enterococcus faecalis/Enterococcus faecium and vanA identified by comparator methods versus the ePlex BCID-GP Panel results is shown in Table 38 and Table 39 for prospective and retrospective samples.
Table 38: Distribution of vanA Results in Enterococcus faecalis Prospective/Retrospective Samples
Comparator Method | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
BCID-GP | Org+/ARG+ | Org+/ARG- | Org- | Total |
Org+/ARG+ | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
Org+/ARG- | 120 | 1 | 122 | |
Org- | 4* | 4 | 1157 | 1165 |
Total | 15 | 124 | 1158 | 1297 |
0/ 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 / 0 - 1 / 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - |
% Agreement (95% CI) for Org+/ARG+: 10/15=66.7 (41.7-84.8)
% Agreement (95% CI) for Org+/ARG-: 120/124=96.8 (92.0-98.7)
% Agreement (95% CI) for Org-: 1157/1158=99.9 (99.5-100)
*2 of the 4 samples had E. faecium with vanA detected by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel.
Table 39: Distribution of vanA Results in Enterococcus faecium Prospective/Retrospective Samples
Comparator Method | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
BCID-GP | Org+/ARG+ | Org+/ARG- | Org- | Total |
Org+/ARG+ | 51 | 2 | 3 | 56 |
Org+/ARG- | 0 | 10 | 5 | 15 |
Org- | 0 | 2 | 1224 | 1226 |
Total | 51 | 14 | 1232 | 1297 |
% Agreement (95% CI) for Org+/ARG+: 51/51=100.0 (93.0-100) | ||||
% Agreement (95% CI) for Org+/ARG-: 10/14=71.4 (45.4-88.3) | ||||
% Agreement (95% CI) for Org-: 1224/1232=99.4 (98.7-99.7) |
42
Co-detections in Clinical Samples
The ePlex BCID-GP Panel identified a total of 103 bacterial co-detections in 1297 clinical samples (prospective/retrospective). In the 711 prospective samples of the clinical study, 38/711 (5.3%) had double detections and 1/711 (0.1%) had a triple detection. In the 586 retrospective samples, 56/586 (9.6%) had co-detections and 8/586 (1.4%) had triple detections. Neither the prospective nor the retrospective arms of the clinical studies contained a sample with more than 3 organisms detected.
In prospective samples, the most common co-detection combination identified by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel was Enterococcus faecalis with Pan Gram-Negative which was detected in 6 samples. Pan Gram-Negative was identified in 17 co-detections, Staphylococcus was identified in 26 co-detections, Enterococcus was identified in 13 co-detections, and Streptococcus was identified in 12 co-detections.
In retrospective samples, the most common co-detection combination identified by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel was Enterococcus faecalis with Pan Gram-Negative which was detected in 9 samples, 2 of which also had vanA detected. Pan Gram-Negative was identified in 33 codetections, Staphylococcus was identified in 22 co-detections, Enterococcus was identified in 34 co-detections, and Streptococcus was identified in 24 co-detections. See Tables 40-41 below for summaries of co-detections in prospective and retrospective samples in targets as determined by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel.
Table 40: Co-Detections Identified by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel in Prospective Clinical | |
---|---|
Samples by Target |
| Distinct Co-Detection Combinations Detected by the ePlex BCID-GP
Panel in Prospective Clinical Samples | | | | Number Samples
(Number
Discrepant) | Discrepant
Organism(s) /
Resistance
Marker(s)* |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------|----------------------|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Target 1 | Target 2 | Target 3 | Resistance
Marker | | |
| C. acnes | Staphylococcus | | | 1 (1) | C. acnes (1) |
| Corynebacterium | S. epidermidis | | mecA | 2 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | E. faecium | | | 2 (1) | E. faecium (1) |
| E. faecalis | Pan GN | | | 6 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | S. epidermidis | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | Staphylococcus | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | Staphylococcus | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
43
| Distinct Co-Detection Combinations Detected by the ePlex BCID-GP
Panel in Prospective Clinical Samples | | | | Number Samples
(Number Discrepant) | Discrepant
Organism(s) /
Resistance
Marker(s)* |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|----------------|----------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Target 1 | Target 2 | Target 3 | Resistance
Marker | | |
| E. faecium | Pan GN | Staphylococcus | mecA, vanA | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecium | S. epidermidis | | mecA, vanA | 1 (0) | |
| Lactobacillus | Streptococcus | | | 1 (1) | Lactobacillus (1) |
| Listeria | Staphylococcus | | | 1 (1) | Listeria (1) |
| Pan GN | S. anginosus group | | | 2 (0) | |
| Pan GN | S. aureus | | | 1 (0) | |
| Pan GN | S. epidermidis | | mecA | 2 (2) | Pan GN (1),
S. epidermidis (1) |
| Pan GN | S. pneumoniae | | | 1 (1) | S. pneumoniae (1) |
| Pan GN | Staphylococcus | | | 2 (0) | |
| Pan GN | Staphylococcus | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| Pan GN | Streptococcus | | | 1 (0) | |
| S. agalactiae | S. aureus | | | 1 (0) | |
| S. anginosus group | Staphylococcus | | | 2 (2) | S. anginosus gp (1),
Staphylococcus (1) |
| S. aureus | S. epidermidis | | mecA | 2 (2) | S. epidermidis (2) |
| S. epidermidis | S. lugdunensis | | | 1 (1) | S. epidermidis (1),
S. lugdunensis (1) |
| S. epidermidis | S. lugdunensis | | mecA | 1 (1) | S. lugdunensis (1) |
| S. epidermidis | Streptococcus | | | 2 (1) | S. epidermidis (1) |
| Staphylococcus | Streptococcus | | | 1 (0) | |
| Staphylococcus | Streptococcus | | mecA | 1 (1) | Streptococcus (1) |
- A discrepant result is one that was detected by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel but not by the comparator method(s). 7/16 discrepant organisms were detected using PCR/sequencing as shown below:
-In 1/1 false positive E. faecium samples, E. faecium was detected.
-In 1/1 false positive Lactobacillus samples, Lactobacillus was detected.
-In 2/5 false positive S. epidermidis samples, S. epidermidis was detected.
-In 2/2 false positive S. lugdunensis samples, S. lugdunensis was detected.
-In 1/1 false positive Streptococcus samples, Streptococcus was detected.
Table 41: Co-Detections Identified by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel in Retrospective Clinical
Samples by Target
| Distinct Co-Detection Combinations Detected by the ePlex BCID-GP
Panel in Retrospective Clinical Samples | | | | Number Samples
(Number
Discrepant) | Discrepant
Organism(s) /
Resistance Marker(s)* |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Target 1 | Target 2 | Target 3 | Resistance
Marker | | |
| Corynebacterium | S. epidermidis | S. lugdunensis | mecA | 1 (1) | Corynebacterium (1) |
| Corynebacterium | Staphylococcus | | | 1 (0) | |
| Corynebacterium | Staphylococcus | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | E. faecium | | | 4 (3) | E. faecium (3) |
| E. faecalis | E. faecium | | vanA | 3 (1) | E. faecium (1) |
| Distinct Co-Detection Combinations Detected by the ePlex BCID-GP
Panel in Retrospective Clinical Samples | | | | Number Samples
(Number
Discrepant) | Discrepant
Organism(s) /
Resistance Marker(s)* |
| Target 1 | Target 2 | Target 3 | Resistance
Marker | | |
| E. faecalis | Pan Candida | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | Pan GN | | | 6 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | Pan GN | | vanA | 2 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | Pan GN | S. aureus | | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | S. aureus | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | Staphylococcus | | vanA | 1 (1) | Staphylococcus (1) |
| E. faecium | Lactobacillus | Pan GN | vanA | 1 (1) | Lactobacillus (1) |
| E. faecium | Pan Candida | | vanA | 1 (1) | E. faecium (1) |
| E. faecium | Pan Candida | S. epidermidis | mecA, vanA | 1 (1) | S. epidermidis (1) |
| E. faecium | Pan GN | | | 3 (0) | |
| E. faecium | Pan GN | | vanA | 5 (0) | |
| E. faecium | Pan GN | Staphylococcus | mecA, vanA | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecium | S. aureus | | mecA, vanA | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecium | Streptococcus | | vanA | 1 (1) | Streptococcus (1) |
| Enterococcus | S. anginosus group | | | 1 (0) | |
| Lactobacillus | S. anginosus group | | | 1 (0) | |
| Micrococcus | S. pyogenes | | | 1 (1) | Micrococcus (1) |
| Pan Candida | S. epidermidis | | mecA | 2 (0) | |
| Pan Candida | S. pneumoniae | | | 1 (0) | |
| Pan GN | S. agalactiae | | | 2 (1) | Pan GN (1) |
| Pan GN | S. anginosus group | | | 4 (0) | |
| Pan GN | S. anginosus group | S. aureus | | 1 (1) | Pan GN (1) |
| Pan GN | S. aureus | | | 1 (0) | |
| Pan GN | S. aureus | S. epidermidis | mecA | 1 (1) | S. epidermidis (1) |
| Pan GN | S. pneumoniae | | | 2 (0) | |
| Pan GN | Streptococcus | | | 3 (0) | |
| S. agalactiae | S. aureus | | | 2 (0) | |
| S. agalactiae | S. aureus | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| S. agalactiae | S. aureus | S. epidermidis | mecA | 1 (1) | S. epidermidis (1) |
| S. aureus | S. epidermidis | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| S. aureus | Streptococcus | | mecA | 2 (1) | Streptococcus (1) |
| S. epidermidis | Streptococcus | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
44
- A discrepant result is one that was detected by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel but not by the comparator method(s). 6/16 discrepant organisms were detected using PCR/sequencing as shown below:
-In 1/1 false positive Corynebacterium samples, Corynebacterium was detected.
-In 2/5 false positive E. faecium samples, E. faecium was detected.
-In 1/1 false positive Staphylococcus samples, Staphylococcus was detected.
-In 2/2 false positive Streptococcus samples, Streptococcus was detected.
45
Additional co-detection combinations identified by comparator method(s) are summarized in
Table 42 and Table 43 for prospective and retrospective samples, respectively.
Table 42: Additional Co-Detections Identified by Comparator Method(s) in Prospective |
---|
Clinical Samples by Organism |
| Distinct Co-Detection Combinations Detected by the
Comparator Methods in Prospective Clinical Samples | | | | | Number
Samples
(Number
Discrepant) | Discrepant
Organism(s)/
Resistance
Markers(s)* |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------|--------------------------|----------------------|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Organism 1 | Organism 2 | Organism 3 | Organism 4 | Resistance
Marker | | |
| A. baumannii | E. faecium | Staphylococcus | | mecA, vanA | 1 (0) | |
| A. baumannii | S. aureus | | | | 1 (0) | |
| A. baumannii | Staphylococcus | | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| Acinetobacter lwoffii | Staphylococcus
hominis | | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| Aerococcus viridansA | K. oxytoca | S. epidermidis | Staphylococcus
cohnii | mecA | 1 (1) | S. cohnii (1),
S. epidermidis (1),
mecA (1) |
| Aerococcus viridansA | Staphylococcus
hominis | | | | 1 (0) | |
| B. fragilis | Clostridium
speciesA | | | | 1 (0) | |
| B. fragilis | S. anginosus gp | | | | 1 (0) | |
| C. acnes | S. epidermidis | | | | 1 (1) | S. epidermidis (1) |
| C. acnes | S. lugdunensis | | | | 1 (1) | C. acnes (1) |
| Citrobacter freundii | K. pneumoniae | Staphylococcus
hominis | | mecA | 1 (1) | mecA (1) |
| Citrobacter koseri | E. faecalis | | | | 1 (0) | |
| Corynebacterium | S. epidermidis | Streptococcus | | mecA | 1 (1) | Streptococcus (1) |
| Corynebacterium | Streptococcus | | | | 1 (1) | Corynebacterium (1) |
| E. coli | E. faecalis | P. mirabilis | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. coli | Lactococcus
lactisA | | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. coli | P. mirabilis | Providencia
stuartii | S. anginosus gp | | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | E. faecium | | | | 1 (1) | E. faecium (1) |
| E. faecalis | K. pneumoniae | | | | 2 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | P. mirabilis | | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | S. aureus | | | mecA | 1 (1) | S. aureus (1),
mecA (1) |
| E. faecalis | S. marcescens | | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | Staphylococcus
(CoNS) | | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecium | S. epidermidis | Staphylococcus
haemolyticus | | mecA, vanA | 1 (0) | |
| K. pneumoniae | Staphylococcus
haemolyticus | non-fermenting
GN bacilli | | | 1 (0) | |
| P. aeruginosa | P. mirabilis | Streptococcus -
viridans group | | | 1 (0) | |
| P. mirabilis | Staphylococcus | | | mecA | 1 (1) | Staphylococcus (1),
mecA (1) |
| Peptostreptococcus
speciesA | Staphylococcus | | | | 1 (0) | |
46
| Distinct Co-Detection Combinations Detected by the
Comparator Methods in Prospective Clinical Samples | | | | | Number
Samples
(Number
Discrepant) | Discrepant
Organism(s)/
Resistance
Markers(s)* |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------|------------|----------------------|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Organism 1 | Organism 2 | Organism 3 | Organism 4 | Resistance
Marker | | |
| Rothia
(stomatococcus)
mucilaginosusA | S. epidermidis | | | | 1 (0) | |
| Rothia mucilaginosaA | Streptococcus -
viridans group | | | | 1 (0) | |
| S. agalactiae | S. aureus | Staphylococcus | | mecA | 1 (1) | S. aureus (1),
Staphylococcus (1),
mecA (1) |
| S. anginosus | Streptococcus
mitis | | | | 1 (1) | S. anginosus (1) |
| S. epidermidis | Staphylococcus
capitis | | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| S. epidermidis | Staphylococcus
hominis | | | | 2 (0) | |
| S. epidermidis | Staphylococcus
hominis | | | mecA | 4 (1) | S. epidermidis (1) |
| S. epidermidis | Staphylococcus
hominis | Staphylococcus
warneri | | | 1 (0) | |
| S. epidermidis | Streptococcus -
viridans group | | | | 1 (1) | S. epidermidis (1) |
| S. epidermidis | Streptococcus
parasanguinis | | | | 1 (0) | |
| S. maltophilia | Streptococcus | | | | 1 (1) | Streptococcus (1) |
| S. marcescens | Streptococcus
mitis group | Streptococcus
salivarius | | | 1 (0) | |
| Staphylococcus cohnii | Streptococcus -
viridans group | | | | 1 (1) | S. viridans group (1) |
| Staphylococcus
hominis | Staphylococcus
pettenkoferi | | | | 1 (0) | |
| Staphylococcus
hominis | Streptococcus
mitis | | | mecA | 1 (1) | mecA (1) |
- A discrepant result is one that was detected by the comparator method(s) but not by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel (excludes organisms not targeted by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel). 16 discrepant organisms were investigated using PCR/sequencing; 1 discrepant organism was not detected:
-In 1/1 false negative S. anginosus group sample, PCR/Sequencing instead detected Streptococcus dysgalactiae.
A. Off-panel organisms not targeted by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel.
Table 43: Additional Co-Detections Identified by Comparator Method(s) in Retrospective
Clinical Samples by Organism
| Distinct Co-Detection Combinations Detected by the
Comparator Methods in Retrospective Clinical Samples | | | | | Number
Samples
(Number
Discrepant) | Discrepant
Organism(s)/
Resistance
Markers(s)* |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Organism 1 | Organism 2 | Organism 3 | Organism 4 | Resistance
Marker | | |
| A. baumannii | E. faecalis | | | vanA | 2 (2) | A. baumannii (2) |
| A. baumannii | E. faecalis | S. aureus | | mecA | 1 (1) | mecA (1) |
| A. baumannii | E. faecium | | | vanA | 1 (0) | |
| Aerococcus
sanguinicolaA | Corynebacterium | Staphylococcus
saprophyticus | | | 1 (0) | |
| Distinct Co-Detection Combinations Detected by the
Comparator Methods in Retrospective Clinical Samples | | | | | Number
Samples
(Number
Discrepant) | Discrepant
Organism(s)/
Resistance
Markers(s)* |
| Organism 1 | Organism 2 | Organism 3 | Organism 4 | Resistance
Marker | (Number
Discrepant) | Resistance
Markers(s)* |
| Aeromonas caviae | E. coli | Enterococcus
casseliflavus | K. oxytoca | | 1 (1) | E. casseliflavus
(1) |
| C. acnes | Enterococcus
avium | | | vanA | 1 (1) | E. avium (1),
vanA (1) |
| C. albicans | E. faecalis | | | vanA | 1 (1) | E. faecalis (1) |
| C. albicans | E. faecium | Staphylococcus
hominis | | mecA, vanA | 1 (0) | |
| C. albicans | S. epidermidis | | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| C. glabrata | Lactobacillus
rhamnosus | | | | 1 (1) | C. glabrata (1) |
| C. glabrata | S. pneumoniae | | | | 1 (0) | |
| C. krusei | S. epidermidis | | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| C. parapsilosis | E. faecalis | | | | 1 (0) | |
| C. parapsilosis | E. faecalis | | | vanA | 1 (1) | C. parapsilosis
(1) |
| Citrobacter braakii | Streptococcus
oralis | | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. cloacae | E. faecalis | | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. cloacae | E. faecium | | | vanA | 1 (0) | |
| E. cloacae | E. faecium | Staphylococcus
hominis | | mecA, vanA | 1 (0) | |
| E. cloacae | S. anginosus gp | | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. coli | E. faecalis | | | | 3 (0) | |
| E. coli | E. faecalis | K. pneumoniae | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. coli | E. faecalis | P. mirabilis | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. coli | E. faecium | | | | 2 (0) | |
| E. coli | K. oxytoca | Streptococcus
infantarius | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. coli | S. agalactiae | | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. coli | S. anginosus gp | | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. coli | S. aureus | | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| E. coli | S. pneumoniae | | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. coli | Streptococcus
bovis | | | | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | K. pneumoniae | | | vanA | 1 (1) | E. faecalis (1),
K. pneumoniae
(1) |
| E. faecalis | M. morganii | | | vanA | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecalis | M. morganii | Proteus vulgaris | | vanA | 1 (1) | E. faecalis (1),
vanA (1) |
| E. faecalis | P. aeruginosa | S. aureus | | mecA | 1 (1) | E. faecalis (1),
P. aeruginosa (1) |
| E. faecalis | P. mirabilis | | | | 2 (2) | E. faecalis (1),
P. mirabilis (1) |
| E. faecalis | P. mirabilis | | | vanA | 1 (1) | E. faecalis (1),
vanA (1) |
| E. faecalis | Providencia
stuartii | | | | 1 (1) | P. stuartii (1) |
| E. faecalis | S. maltophilia | | | vanA | 1 (0) | |
| Distinct Co-Detection Combinations Detected by the
Comparator Methods in Retrospective Clinical Samples | Number
Samples
(Number
Discrepant) | Discrepant
Organism(s)/
Resistance
Markers(s)* | | | | |
| Organism 1 | Organism 2 | Organism 3 | Organism 4 | Resistance
Marker | | |
| E. faecium | Moraxella
(Branhamella)
catarrhalis | Pediococcus
pentosaceus | | vanA | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecium | P. aeruginosa | | | vanA | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecium | P. mirabilis | | | vanA | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecium | Pseudomonas | | | vanA | 1 (0) | |
| E. faecium | S. epidermidis | Staphylococcus
hominis | | mecA | 1 (1) | E. faecium (1) |
| Enterobacter
aerogenes | S. anginosus gp | | | | 1 (0) | |
| Enterococcus avium | S. anginosus gp | | | | 1 (0) | |
| K. oxytoca | S. anginosus gp | | | | 1 (0) | |
| K. pneumoniae | S. aureus | | | | 2 (1) | S. aureus (1) |
| L. monocytogenes | Staphylococcus | | | mecA | 1 (1) | Staphylococcus
(1), mecA (1) |
| Lactobacillus casei | Veillonella
species | | | | 1 (1) | Veillonella
species (1) |
| Lactobacillus
rhamnosus | Pediococcus
acidilacticiA | | | | 1 (0) | |
| Lactobacillus
rhamnosus | S. anginosus gp | Staphylococcus | Streptococcus -
viridans group | | 1 (1) | Staphylococcus
(1) |
| Micrococcus | Pseudoclavibact
erA | | | | 1 (0) | |
| Moraxella catarrhalis | S. pneumoniae | | | | 1 (0) | |
| S. agalactiae | S. aureus | | | | 1 (1) | S. aureus (1) |
| S. agalactiae | S. aureus | Streptococcus -
viridans group | | | 1 (0) | |
| S. aureus | S. epidermidis | | | | 1 (1) | S. aureus (1) |
| S. aureus | S. pyogenes | | | mecA | 1 (1) | S. pyogenes (1) |
| S. aureus | Staphylococcus
capitis | | | | 1 (0) | |
| S. aureus | Streptococcus
mitis | | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| S. epidermidis | Staphylococcus
hominis | | | | 1 (0) | |
| S. epidermidis | Staphylococcus
hominis | | | mecA | 3 (0) | |
| S. epidermidis | Staphylococcus
hominis | Streptococcus
parasanguinis | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
| Staphylococcus capitis | Staphylococcus
hominis | | | mecA | 1 (0) | |
47
48
- A discrepant result is one that was detected by the comparator method(s) but not by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel (excludes organisms not targeted by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel). 24 discrepant organisms were investigated using PCR/sequencing; 2 discrepant organisms were not detected:
-In 2/6 false negative E. faecalis samples, PCR/Sequencing instead detected Enterococcus faecium.
A. Off-panel organisms not targeted by the ePlex BCID-GP Panel.
49
Clinical Study ePlex Instrument Performance
A total of 2354 samples (including prospective, retrospective, and contrived samples) were initially tested in the clinical evaluations. Of these, 24/2354 (1.0%) did not complete the run and the sample was retested. After repeat testing, all 2354 samples completed testing and 2246/2354 (95.4%, 95% CI: 94.5%-96.2%) generated valid results and 108/2354 (4.6%, 95% CI: 3.8%-5.5%) generated invalid results on the first completed attempt.
Upon repeat testing of the 108 samples with initially invalid results, 3/108 (2.8%) did not complete the run and the sample was retested. After repeat testing, all 108 samples completed testing and 106/108 (98.1%) generated valid results. Overall, after final testing, 2/2354 (0.1%, 95% CI: 0.0%-0.3%) had final, invalid results, resulting in a final validity rate of 2352/2354 (99.9%, 95% CI: 99.7%-100%).
ANALYTICAL PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS
Limit of Detection (Analytical Sensitivity)
The limit of detection (LoD), or analytical sensitivity, was identified and verified for each assay on the BCID-GP Panel using at least two quantified reference strains in simulated blood culture sample matrix, which is defined as a whole blood with EDTA added to a blood culture bottle in the same ratio as the manufacturer recommends and incubated for 8 hours. At least 20 replicates per target were tested for each condition. The limit of detection was defined as the lowest concentration of each target that is detected in ≥95% of tested replicates. The confirmed LoD for each ePlex BCID-GP Panel organism is shown in Table 44.
50
Table 44: LoD Results Summary
| Target | Organism | Strain | LoD Concentration
(CFU/mL) |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------|-------------------------------|
| B. cereus group | Bacillus cereus | ATCC 21769 | 1 x 105 |
| B. cereus group | Bacillus thuringiensis | ATCC 35646 | 1 x 105 |
| B. subtilis group | Bacillus subtilis | ATCC 55614 | 1 x 106 |
| B. subtilis group | Bacillus atrophaeus | ATCC 51189 | 1 x 106 |
| Corynebacterium | Corynebacterium striatum | ATCC 43735 | 1 x 106 |
| Corynebacterium | Corynebacterium jeikeium | ATCC 43217 | 1 x 107 |
| Cutibacterium acnes (P. acnes) | Cutibacterium acnes (P. acnes) | ATCC 33179 | 1 x 107 |
| Cutibacterium acnes (P. acnes) | Cutibacterium acnes (P. acnes) | ATCC 6919 | 1 x 108 |
| Enterococcus | Enterococcus faecium | ATCC BAA-2316 | 1 x 105 |
| Enterococcus | Enterococcus faecium | ATCC BAA-2317 | 1 x 106 |
| Enterococcus | Enterococcus raffinosus | ATCC 49464 | 1 x 106 |
| Enterococcus faecium | Enterococcus faecium | ATCC BAA-2316 | 1 x 105 |
| Enterococcus faecium | Enterococcus faecium | ATCC BAA-2317 | 1 x 106 |
| Enterococcus faecalis | Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 51575 | 1 x 106 |
| Enterococcus faecalis | Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 700802 | 1 x 106 |
| Lactobacillus | Lactobacillus paracasei | ATCC 25598 | 1 x 105 |
| Lactobacillus | Lactobacillus casei | ATCC 334 | 1 x 105 |
| Listeria | Listeria seeligeri | ATCC 35967 | 1 x 105 |
| Listeria | Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 10890 | 1 x 105 |
| Listeria monocytogenes | Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 19111 | 1 x 106 |
| Listeria monocytogenes | Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 10890 | 1 x 105 |
| Listeria monocytogenes | Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 19111 | 1 x 105 |
| Micrococcus | Micrococcus luteus | ATCC 19212 | 1 x 106 |
| Micrococcus | Micrococcus luteus | ATCC 10240 | 1 x 107 |
| Staphylococcus | Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC BAA-2313 | 1 x 104 |
| Staphylococcus | Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC BAA-2312 | 1 x 105 |
| Staphylococcus | Staphylococcus epidermidis | ATCC 35983 | 1 x 105 |
| Staphylococcus | Staphylococcus epidermidis | ATCC 35984 | 1 x 105 |
| Staphylococcus | Staphylococcus lugdunensis | NRS 879 | 1 x 105 |
| Staphylococcus | Staphylococcus lugdunensis | ATCC 49576 | 1 x 106 |
| Staphylococcus | Staphylococcus haemolyticus | NRS 62 | 1 x 107 |
| Staphylococcus aureus | Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC BAA-2313 | 1 x 105 |
| Staphylococcus aureus | Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC BAA-2312 | 1 x 105 |
| Staphylococcus epidermidis | Staphylococcus epidermidis | ATCC 35983 | 1 x 105 |
| Staphylococcus epidermidis | Staphylococcus epidermidis | ATCC 35984 | 1 x 105 |
| Staphylococcus lugdunensis | Staphylococcus lugdunensis | NRS 879 | 1 x 105 |
| | Staphylococcus lugdunensis | ATCC 49576 | 1 x 105 |
| Streptococcus | Streptococcus pneumoniae | ATCC BAA-475 | 1 x 105 |
| Streptococcus | Streptococcus pneumoniae | ATCC 10357 | 1 x 105 |
| Streptococcus | Streptococcus gordonii | ATCC 10558 | 1 x 106 |
| Streptococcus | Streptococcus agalactiae | ATCC 12401 | 1 x 106 |
| Streptococcus | Streptococcus agalactiae | ATCC 13813 | 1 x 107 |
| Target | Organism | Strain | LoD Concentration
(CFU/mL) |
| Streptococus agalactiae | Streptococus agalactiae | ATCC 12401 | 1 x 105 |
| Streptococus agalactiae | Streptococus agalactiae | ATCC 13813 | 1 x 106 |
| Streptococcus anginosus group | Streptococus intermedius | ATCC 27335 | 1 x 104 |
| Streptococcus anginosus group | Streptococus anginosus | ATCC 9895 | 1 x 106 |
| Streptococus pneumoniae | Streptococus pneumoniae | ATCC BAA-475 | 1 x 105 |
| Streptococus pneumoniae | Streptococus pneumoniae | ATCC 10357 | 1 x 105 |
| Streptococus pyogenes | Streptococus pyogenes | ATCC 12384 | 1 x 105 |
| Streptococus pyogenes | Streptococus pyogenes | ATCC 49399 | 1 x 105 |
| Pan Gram-Negative | Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | ATCC 13636 | 1 x 106 |
| Pan Gram-Negative | Enterobacter cloacae | ATCC 13047 | 1 x 106 |
| Pan Gram-Negative | Escherichia coli | ATCC 4157 | 1 x 106 |
| Pan Gram-Negative | Klebsiella pneumoniae | ATCC BAA-1706 | 1 x 106 |
| Pan Gram-Negative | Serratia marcescens | ATCC 8100 | 1 x 106 |
| Pan Gram-Negative | Proteus mirabilis | ATCC 43071 | 1 x 106 |
| Pan Gram-Negative | Acinetobacter baumannii | NCTC13302 | 1 x 107 |
| Pan Gram-Negative | Neisseria meningitidis | ATCC 13113 | 1 x 107 |
| Pan Gram-Negative | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | ATCC 15442 | 1 x 107 |
| Pan Candida | Candida albicans | ATCC 24433 | 1 x 106 |
| Pan Candida | Candida glabrata | ATCC 66032 | 1 x 106 |
| mecA | Staphylococcus epidermidis | ATCC 35983 | 1 x 105 |
| mecA | Staphylococcus epidermidis | ATCC 35984 | 1 x 105 |
| mecC | Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC BAA-2313 | 1 x 104 |
| mecC | Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC BAA-2312 | 1 x 104 |
| vanA | Enterococcus faecium | ATCC BAA-2316 | 1 x 104 |
| vanA | Enterococcus faecium | ATCC BAA-2317 | 1 x 105 |
| vanB | Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 51575 | 1 x 105 |
| vanB | Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 700802 | 1 x 105 |
51
Analytical Reactivity (Inclusivity)
A panel of 459 strains/isolates representing the genetic, temporal and geographic diversity of each target on the ePlex BCID-GP Panel was evaluated to demonstrate analytical reactivity. Each bacterial strain was tested in triplicate at 1 x 10° CFU/mL or less and each fungal strain was tested at 1 x 106 CFU/mL. In the cases where the initial testing concentration did not result in a "Detected" result, the concentration was increased to the point where detection was observed (see footnotes for concentrations of these strains). Organisms detected are shown in Table 45. Additional strains were detected as a part of the Limit of Detection (Analytical Sensitivity) study and can be found in Table 44.
52
Table 45: Analytical Reactivity (Inclusivity) Results | ||
---|---|---|
Organism | Strain |
---|---|
Bacillus cereus | ATCC 21769 |
Bacillus cereus | ATCC 10876 |
Bacillus cereus | ATCC 31430 |
Bacillus cereus | ATCC 53522 |
Bacillus cereus | ATCC 35646 |
Bacillus cereus | ATCC 33679 |
Bacillus thuringiensis | ATCC 55173 |
Bacillus thuringiensis | ATCC 10792 |
Bacillus subtilis | |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | ATCC 23845 |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | ATCC 23842 |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | ATCC 23350 |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | ATCC 53495 |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | ATCC 51189 |
Bacillus atrophaeus | ATCC 6455 |
Bacillus atrophaeus | ATCC 49337 |
Bacillus atrophaeus | ATCC 7972 |
Bacillus atrophaeus | ATCC 6537 |
Bacillus licheniformis | ATCC 53926 |
Bacillus licheniformis | ATCC 55768 |
Bacillus licheniformis | ATCC 21039 |
Bacillus licheniformis | ATCC 21667 |
Bacillus licheniformis | ATCC 55614 |
Bacillus licheniformis | ATCC 15561 |
Bacillus subtilis | ATCC 21008 |
Bacillus subtilis | ATCC 15040 |
Corynebacterium | |
Corynebacterium afermentans subsp. afermentans | ATCC 51403A |
Corynebacterium afermentans subsp. lipophilum | ATCC 51404 |
Corynebacterium confusum | ATCC 38268A |
Corynebacterium coyleae | ATCC 700219 |
Corynebacterium diphtheriae | ATCC 13812 |
Corynebacterium falsenii | ATCC BAA-596A |
Corynebacterium freneyi | ATCC 64424B |
Corynebacterium imitans | ATCC 700354B |
Corynebacterium jeikeium | ATCC 43217 |
Corynebacterium jeikeium | ATCC 43216 |
Corynebacterium jeikeium | ATCC 43734 |
Corynebacterium jeikeium | ATCC BAA-949 |
Corynebacterium minutissimum | ATCC 23348 |
Corynebacterium resistens | CCUG 50093T |
Corynebacterium simulans | ATCC BAA-15 |
Corynebacterium simulans | ATCC BAA-1293 |
Corynebacterium striatum | ATCC 43735 |
Organism | Strain |
Staphylococcus lentus | ATCC 700403 |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | NRS-879 |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | ATCC 49576 |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | NRS-878 |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | NRS-880 |
Staphylococcus muscae | ATCC 49910 |
Staphylococcus pasteuri | ATCC 51129 |
Staphylococcus pasteuri (mecC+) | ATCC 51128 |
Staphylococcus pettenkoferi | DSM-19554 |
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius | ATCC 49444 |
Staphylococcus saccharolyticus | ATCC 14953 |
Staphylococcus saprophyticus | ATCC 15305 |
Staphylococcus saprophyticus | ATCC 35552 |
Staphylococcus schleiferi | ATCC 49545 |
Staphylococcus schleiferi | ATCC 43808 |
Staphylococcus sciuri | ATCC 29060 |
Staphylococcus sciuri | ATCC 29061 |
Staphylococcus sciuri | ATCC 29059 |
Staphylococcus sciuri | ATCC 49575 |
Staphylococcus sciuri | ATCC 29062 |
Staphylococcus simulans | ATCC 27848 |
Staphylococcus simulans | ATCC 27850 |
Staphylococcus simulans | ATCC 31432 |
Staphylococcus simulans | ATCC 27851 |
Staphylococcus species | ATCC 155 |
Staphylococcus species (mecA+) | ATCC 27626 |
Staphylococcus vitulinus | ATCC 51699 |
Staphylococcus vitulinus | ATCC 51161 |
Staphylococcus warneri | ATCC 27836 |
Staphylococcus xylosus | ATCC 49148 |
Staphylococcus xylosus | ATCC 29971 |
Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC 25923 |
Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC 29247 |
Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC 6538P |
Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC 29213 |
Staphylococcus aureus | NR-45889 |
Staphylococcus aureus | NR-45890 |
Staphylococcus aureus | NR-46074 |
Staphylococcus aureus | NR-45881 |
Staphylococcus aureus | NR-46411 |
Staphylococcus aureus | NR-46414 |
Staphylococcus aureus | NR-46418 |
Staphylococcus aureus | NR-46417 |
Staphylococcus aureus | NR-13524 |
53
Organism | Strain |
---|---|
Corynebacterium timonense | CCUG 64728A |
Corynebacterium ulcerans | ATCC 51799 |
Corynebacterium urealyticum | ATCC 43044 |
Corynebacterium urealyticum | ATCC 43042 |
Corynebacterium urealyticum | ATCC 43043 |
Corynebacterium | |
ureicelerivorans | CCUG 59144 |
Cutibacterium acnes | ATCC 11827 |
Cutibacterium acnes | ATCC 11828 |
Cutibacterium acnes | ATCC 33179 |
Cutibacterium acnes | ATCC 6919 |
Enterococcus | |
Enterococcus avium | ATCC 14025 |
Enterococcus casseliflavus | ATCC 700668 |
Enterococcus casseliflavus | ATCC 25788 |
Enterococcus casseliflavus | ATCC 700327 |
Enterococcus cecorum | ATCC 43198 |
Enterococcus dispar | ATCC 51266 |
Enterococcus durans | ATCC 11576 |
Enterococcus durans | ATCC 51575 |
Enterococcus durans | ATCC 700802 |
Enterococcus durans | ATCC 10100 |
Enterococcus durans | ATCC 12399 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 14506 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 33186 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 49532 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 49533 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 7080 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 49474 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 49332 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 29200 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC BAA-2128 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 51188 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 49149 |
Enterococcus faecalis | NCTC-775 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 19433 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 49452 |
Enterococcus faecalis (vanA+) | JMI 876745 |
Enterococcus faecalis (vanB+) | ATCC BAA-2365 |
Enterococcus faecalis (vanB+) | ATCC 51299 |
Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 19434 |
Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 23828 |
Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 27273 |
Enterococcus faecium | ATCC BAA-2127 |
Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 6057 |
Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 49624 |
Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 6569 |
Enterococcus faecium | ATCC BAA-472 |
Organism | Strain |
NR-13525 | |
NR-13526 | |
NRS-123 | |
NR-46805 | |
NRS-662 | |
ATCC BAA-1707 | |
ATCC 43300 | |
NRS-383 | |
NCTC-12493 | |
NRS-676 | |
NRS-678 | |
NRS-648 | |
NRS-651 | |
NRS-643 | |
NRS-484 | |
NRS-385 | |
NRS-384 | |
ATCC BAA-40 | |
ATCC 700698 | |
NRS-382 | |
NRS-659 | |
NRS-657 | |
NRS-655 | |
NRS-654 | |
NRS-647 | |
ATCC BAA-42 | |
ATCC BAA-41 | |
NRS-483 | |
NRS-675 | |
NRS-645 | |
NRS-687 | |
NRS-667 | |
NRS-677 | |
NRS-683 | |
NRS-688 | |
NRS-22 | |
NRS-387 | |
NRS-70 | |
Staphylococcus aureus | |
(mecA+) | ATCC 33591 |
Staphylococcus aureus | |
(mecC+) | ATCC BAA-2312 |
ATCC BAA-2313 | |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | ATCC 12228 |
ATCC 49134 | |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | NCIMB-8853 |
ATCC 700583 | |
ATCC 14990 | |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | |
(mecA+) | ATCC 35983 |
ATCC 35984 |
54
Organism | Strain |
---|---|
Enterococcus faecium (vanA+) | ATCC 49224 |
ATCC BAA-2846 | |
ATCC 19953 | |
ATCC 27270 | |
ATCC 35667 | |
ATCC BAA-2316 | |
ATCC BAA-2317 | |
ATCC 700221 | |
ATCC BAA-2319 | |
ATCC BAA-2320 | |
LMC 003921 | |
LMC 103676 | |
Enterococcus faecium (vanA+) | LMC 089524 |
LMC 104266 | |
LMC 032261 | |
LMC 110371 | |
LMC 002867 | |
LMC 055971 | |
ATCC 51559 | |
ATCC BAA-2318 | |
Enterococcus faecium (vanB+) | ATCC 51858 |
ATCC 49573 | |
ATCC 49609 | |
Enterococcus gallinarum | ATCC 49610 |
ATCC 700425 | |
ATCC 49608 | |
Enterococcus hirae | ATCC 49479 |
ATCC 10541 | |
Enterococcus italicus | CCUG 47860 |
Enterococcus malodoratus | ATCC 43197 |
Enterococcus pseudoavium | CCUG 33310T |
Enterococcus raffinosus | ATCC 49464 |
Enterococcus saccharolyticus | ATCC 43076 |
Enterococcus sanguinicola | DSM-21767 |
Enterococcus faecalis | |
ATCC 51575 | |
ATCC 700802 | |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 10100 |
ATCC 12399 | |
ATCC 14506 | |
ATCC 33186 | |
ATCC 49532 | |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 49533 |
ATCC 7080 | |
ATCC 49474 | |
ATCC 49332 | |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 29200 |
ATCC BAA-2128 | |
ATCC 51188 | |
Organism | Strain |
ATCC 29887 | |
ATCC 49461 | |
ATCC 700565 | |
ATCC 51625 | |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | |
NRS-879 | |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | ATCC 49576 |
NRS-878 | |
NRS-880 | |
Streptococcus | ATCC 12401 |
ATCC 13813 | |
ATCC 12386 | |
Streptococcus agalactiae | ATCC 12973 |
ATCC 27956 | |
NCTC-8017 | |
ATCC 12403 | |
ATCC 9895 | |
Streptococcus anginosus | ATCC 33397 |
NCTC-10713 | |
Streptococcus bovis | ATCC 33317 |
ATCC 35034 | |
Streptococcus constellatus | ATCC 27513 |
Streptococcus criceti | ATCC 19642c |
ATCC 35666 | |
Streptococcus dysgalactiae | ATCC 43078 |
ATCC 12394 | |
Streptococcus equi | ATCC 43079 |
ATCC 9528 | |
ATCC 15351 | |
Streptococcus equinus | ATCC 9812 |
ATCC 49475 | |
Streptococcus gallolyticus | ATCC 9809 |
ATCC 43144 | |
Streptococcus gordonii | ATCC 10558 |
ATCC 35557 | |
ATCC BAA-102 | |
Streptococcus infantarius | ATCC BAA-103 |
ATCC BAA-2089 | |
Streptococcus infantis | ATCC 700779 |
Streptococcus intermedius | ATCC 27335 |
Streptococcus mitis | ATCC 15914 |
ATCC 6249 | |
ATCC 49456 | |
Streptococcus mitis | NCIMB-13770 |
Streptococcus oralis | ATCC 35037 |
Streptococcus oralis | ATCC 55229 |
Streptococcus parasanguinis | ATCC 15909 |
Streptococcus peroris | ATCC 700780 |
Confidential
Page 51
55
Organism | Strain |
---|---|
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 49149 |
NCTC-775 | |
ATCC 19433 | |
ATCC 49452 | |
Enterococcus faecalis (vanA+) | JMI 876745 |
Enterococcus faecalis (vanB+) | ATCC BAA-2365 |
Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 51299 |
Enterococcus faecium | ATCC 19434 |
ATCC 23828 | |
ATCC 27273 | |
ATCC BAA-2127 | |
ATCC 6057 | |
ATCC 49624 | |
ATCC 6569 | |
ATCC BAA-472 | |
ATCC 9756 | |
ATCC 49224 | |
Enterococcus faecium | ATCC BAA-2846 |
ATCC 19953 | |
ATCC 27270 | |
ATCC 35667 | |
Enterococcus faecium (vanA+) | ATCC BAA-2316 |
Enterococcus faecium (vanA+) | ATCC BAA-2317 |
Enterococcus faecium (vanA+) | ATCC 700221 |
ATCC BAA-2319 | |
ATCC BAA-2320 | |
LMC 003921 | |
LMC 103676 | |
LMC 089524 | |
LMC 104266 | |
LMC 032261 | |
Enterococcus faecium (vanA+) | LMC 110371 |
LMC 002867 | |
LMC 055971 | |
ATCC 51559 | |
Enterococcus faecium (vanA+) | ATCC BAA-2318 |
Enterococcus faecium (vanB+) | ATCC 51858 |
Lactobacillus casei | ATCC 334 |
Organism | Strain |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | ATCC BAA-475 |
ATCC 10357 | |
ATCC 49619 | |
ATCC 49136 | |
ATCC BAA-659 | |
ATCC 6315 | |
ATCC BAA-1667 | |
ATCC 700674 | |
ATCC 6321 | |
ATCC 700673 | |
ATCC 51916 | |
ATCC 8338 | |
ATCC 6301 | |
ATCC 8335 | |
NCIMB-13286 | |
Streptococcus pyogenes | ATCC BAA-1656 |
ATCC 12384 | |
ATCC 49399 | |
ATCC 12344 | |
ATCC 19615 | |
NCIMB-13285 | |
ATCC 14289 | |
Streptococcus salivarius | ATCC 13419c |
ATCC 7073 | |
Streptococcus salivarius | ATCC 25975 |
ATCC 31067c | |
Streptococcus sanguinis | ATCC 10556 |
Streptococcus thoraltensis | ATCC 700865 |
Streptococcus agalactiae | ATCC 12401 |
ATCC 13813 | |
ATCC 12386 | |
ATCC 12973 | |
ATCC 27956 | |
NCTC-8017 | |
ATCC 12403 | |
Streptococcus anginosus group | |
Streptococcus anginosus | ATCC 9895 |
ATCC 33397 | |
NCTC-10713 | |
Streptococcus constellatus | ATCC 27513 |
56
Organism | Strain |
---|---|
Lactobacillus paracasei | ATCC 39392 |
ATCC 25598 | |
ATCC BAA-52 | |
ATCC 27092 | |
Lactobacillus rhamnosus | ATCC 39595 |
ATCC 53103 | |
ATCC 55915 | |
Lactobacillus zeae | ATCC 15820 |
Listeria | |
Listeria innocua | NCTC-11288 |
ATCC 33090 | |
Listeria ivanovii | ATCC 19119 |
ATCC BAA-139 | |
ATCC 700402 | |
Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 10890 |
ATCC 19111 | |
ATCC 13932 | |
ATCC 19114 | |
ATCC 7644 | |
ATCC 19112 | |
ATCC BAA-751 | |
ATCC 19118 | |
Listeria seeligeri | ATCC 19115 |
Listeria welshimeri | ATCC 35967 |
Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 35897 |
Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 10890 |
Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 19111 |
Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 13932 |
Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 19114 |
Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 7644 |
Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 19112 |
Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC BAA-751 |
Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 19118 |
Listeria monocytogenes | ATCC 19115 |
Micrococcus | |
ATCC 19212 | |
ATCC 10240 | |
Micrococcus luteus | ATCC 400 |
ATCC 53598 | |
ATCC 49732 | |
ATCC 4698 | |
Micrococcus lylae | ATCC 27566 |
Micrococcus yunnanensis | ATCC 7468 |
Staphylococcus | |
Staphylococcus arlettae | ATCC 43957 |
Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC 25923 |
ATCC 29247 | |
Organism | Strain |
Streptococcus intermedius | ATCC 27335 |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | ATCC BAA-475 |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | ATCC 10357 |
ATCC 49619 | |
ATCC 49136 | |
ATCC BAA-659 | |
ATCC 6315 | |
ATCC BAA-1667 | |
ATCC 700674 | |
ATCC 6321 | |
ATCC 700673 | |
ATCC 51916 | |
ATCC 8338 | |
ATCC 6301 | |
ATCC 8335 | |
NCIMB-13286 | |
Streptococcus pyogenes | ATCC BAA-1656 |
ATCC 12384 | |
ATCC 49399 | |
ATCC 12344 | |
Streptococcus pyogenes | ATCC 19615 |
NCIMB-13285 | |
ATCC 14289 | |
Pan Candida | ATCC 24433 |
ATCC MYA-4441 | |
Candida albicans | ATCC 14053 |
Candida albicans | ATCC 90028 |
ATCC 66032 | |
ATCC 15126 | |
Candida glabrata | ATCC MYA-2950 |
ATCC 2001 | |
Candida krusei | ATCC 34135 |
ATCC 32196 | |
ATCC 14243 | |
ATCC 90018D | |
Candida parapsilosis | ATCC 58895 |
ATCC 22019 | |
Pan Gram-Negative | |
Acinetobacter baumannii | NCTC-13302 |
NCTC-13422 | |
Acinetobacter haemolyticus | ATCC 19002 |
Acinetobacter junii | ATCC 17908 |
Acinetobacter lwoffii | ATCC 15309 |
Acinetobacter ursingii | ATCC BAA-617 |
Bacteroides fragilis | NCTC-9343 |
57
Organism | Strain | Organism | Strain |
---|---|---|---|
ATCC 6538P | Burkholderia cepacia | ATCC 25416 | |
ATCC 29213 | Cedecea davisiae | ATCC 43025 | |
NR-45889 | Citrobacter freundii | NCTC-9750 | |
NR-45890 | Citrobacter koseri | ATCC 27156 | |
NR-46074 | Cronobacter muytjensii | ATCC 51329 | |
NR-45881 | Cronobacter sakazakii | ATCC 12868 | |
NR-46411 | Edwardsiella tarda | ATCC 15947 | |
NR-46414 | Enterobacter aerogenes | ATCC 13048 | |
NR-46418 | Enterobacter amnigenus | ATCC 51816 | |
NR-46417 | Enterobacter asburiae | ATCC 35953 | |
NR-13524 | ATCC 13047 | ||
NR-13527 | ATCC 23373 | ||
NR-13525 | Enterobacter cloacae | ATCC 23355 | |
NR-13526 | ATCC 35030 | ||
NRS-123 | Enterobacter hormaechei | ATCC 700322 | |
NR-46805 | Erwinia aphidicola | ATCC 27991 | |
Staphylococcus aureus (mecA+) | NRS-662 | ATCC 4157 | |
ATCC BAA-1707 | ATCC 14948 | ||
ATCC 43300 | Escherichia coli | ATCC 25922 | |
NRS-383 | ATCC BAA- | ||
NCTC-12493 | Escherichia fergusonii | ATCC 35469 | |
NRS-676 | Escherichia hermannii | ATCC 700368 | |
NRS-678 | Escherichia vulneris | ATCC 33821 | |
NRS-648 | Fusobacterium necrophorum | ATCC 25286 | |
NRS-651 | Fusobacterium nucleatum | ATCC 25586 | |
NRS-643 | Haemophilus influenzae | ATCC 10211 | |
NRS-484 | ATCC 49144 | ||
NRS-385 | ATCC 43065 | ||
Staphylococcus aureus (mecA+) | NRS-384 | Haemophilus influenzae | NCTC-8468 |
ATCC BAA-40 | Haemophilus parainfluenzae | ATCC 9796 | |
ATCC 700698 | Hafnia alvei | ATCC 51815 | |
NRS-382 | ATCC 700324 | ||
NRS-659 | Klebsiella oxytoca | ATCC 43165 | |
NRS-657 | ATCC 43863 | ||
NRS-655 | Klebsiella ozaenae | ATCC 11296 | |
NRS-654 | ATCC BAA- | ||
NRS-647 | NCTC-9633 | ||
Staphylococcus aureus (mecA+) | ATCC BAA-42 | Klebsiella pneumoniae | NCTC-13440 |
ATCC BAA-41 | ATCC 51503 | ||
NRS-483 | Kluyvera ascorbata | ATCC 14236 | |
NRS-675 | Kluyvera cryocrescens | ATCC 14240 |
58
Organism | Strain |
---|---|
NRS-645 | |
NRS-687 | |
NRS-667 | |
NRS-677 | |
NRS-683 | |
NRS-688 | |
NRS-22 | |
NRS-387 | |
NRS-70 | |
ATCC 33591 | |
Staphylococcus aureus (mecC+) | ATCC BAA-2312 |
ATCC BAA-2313 | |
Staphylococcus auricularis | ATCC 33750 |
ATCC 33753 | |
Staphylococcus capitis | ATCC 27840 |
NRS-866 | |
ATCC 35661 | |
Staphylococcus caprae | ATCC 51548 |
Staphylococcus carnosus | ATCC 51365 |
Staphylococcus chromogenes | ATCC 43764 |
Staphylococcus cohnii | ATCC 29974 |
ATCC 12228 | |
ATCC 49134 | |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | NCIMB-8853 |
ATCC 700583 | |
ATCC 14990 | |
ATCC 35983 | |
ATCC 35984 | |
ATCC 29887 | |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | |
(mecA+) | ATCC 49461 |
ATCC 700565 | |
ATCC 51625 | |
Staphylococcus gallinarum | ATCC 700401 |
ATCC 35539 | |
Staphylococcus haemolyticus | ATCC 29970 |
ATCC 31874 | |
Staphylococcus haemolyticus | |
(mecA+) | NRS-62 |
ATCC BAA-1693 | |
NRS-69 | |
Organism | Strain |
Legionella pneumophila | ATCC 33823 |
Moraxella catarrhalis | ATCC 23246 |
Moraxella nonliquefaciens | ATCC 17953 |
Moraxella osloensis | ATCC 10973 |
Morganella morganii | ATCC 25829 |
Neisseria lactamica | ATCC 23970 |
Neisseria meningitidis | ATCC 13090 |
ATCC 13113 | |
ATCC 13077 | |
ATCC 13102 | |
Neisseria mucosa | ATCC 19695 |
Neisseria sicca | ATCC 29193 |
Pantoea agglomerans | ATCC 14537 |
Pasteurella aerogenes | ATCC 27883 |
Proteus mirabilis | ATCC 43071 |
CDC#0155 | |
CDC#0159 | |
Proteus penneri | ATCC 35197 |
Proteus vulgaris | ATCC 6380 |
Providencia alcalifaciens | ATCC 9886 |
Providencia rettgeri | ATCC 9919 |
Providencia stuartii | ATCC 33672 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | ATCC 15442 |
NCIMB-12469 | |
ATCC 10145 | |
Pseudomonas fluorescens | ATCC 13525 |
Pseudomonas luteola | ATCC 35970 |
Pseudomonas putida | ATCC 31483 |
Raoultella terrigena | ATCC 55553 |
Salmonella bongori | ATCC 43975 |
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica | ATCC 51957 |
Salmonella enterica Choleraesuis | ATCC 12011 |
Salmonella enterica Paratyphi | FSL S5-0447 |
Salmonella typhi | ATCC 19430 |
Serratia fonticola | ATCC 29844 |
Serratia liquefaciens | ATCC 27592 |
Serratia marcescens | ATCC 8100 |
ATCC 14756 | |
ATCC 13880 | |
Serratia odorifera | ATCC 33077 |
Page 55
59
Organism | Strain |
---|---|
NRS-870 | |
ATCC 27844 | |
Staphylococcus hominis | |
(mecA+) | ATCC 700237 |
ATCC 700236 | |
Staphylococcus hyicus | ATCC 11249 |
Staphylococcus intermedius | ATCC 29663 |
ATCC 49052 |
Organism | Strain |
---|---|
Serratia rubidaea | ATCC 27593 |
Shigella boydii | ATCC 9207 |
Shigella dysenteriae | ATCC 13313 |
Shigella sonnei | ATCC 29930 |
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | ATCC 13636 |
Tatumella ptyseos | ATCC 33302 |
Yersinia enterocolitica subsp. | |
Enterocolitica | ATCC 9610 |
^A Detected at 2 x 10^6 CFU/mL
^ Detected at 2 x 10°CFU/mL
B Detected at 2 x 10°CFU/mL
C Detected at 2 x 10°CFU/mL
C Detected at 2 x 10°CFU/mL
- Detected at 4 x 10⁶ CFU/mL
- Detected at 1 x 10⁷ CFU/L
C Detected at 4 x 108 CFU/mL
り Detected at 1 x 107 CFU/mL
60
Predicted (in silico) Reactivity for Genus and Group Assays
Note: the performance of the ePlex BCID-GP Panel has not been established for all of the organisms listed in the tables below. See the Analytical Reactivity (Inclusivity) and Limit of Detection (Analytical Sensitivity) sections for data on organisms for which performance characteristics have been established (indicated with an asterisk in Tables 46-57). Some species were not assessed in silico due to lack of sequence data, though they may appear in the analytical sensitivity or specificity studies.
In addition to species-specific assays, the ePlex BCID-GP Panel contains a number of broader genus or group-level assays; including Bacillus cereus group, Bacillus subtilis group, Corynebacterium, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Listeria, Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Streptococcus anginosus group, Pan Candida and Pan Gram-Negative assays. Tables 46-57 summarize the predicted (in silico) reactivity (inclusivity) for these assay targets.
Detection Predicted for ≥95% of target sequences | ||
---|---|---|
Bacillus thuringiensis* | Bacillus toyonensis | Bacillus weihenstephanensis |
Detection Predicted for 85%-94% of target sequences | ||
Bacillus cereus* | ||
Detection Predicted for |