(88 days)
For the quantitative determination of free protein S antigen in human plasma collected from venous blood samples in 3.2% sodium citrate tubes on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer.
As an aid in the diagnosis of protein S deficiency in patients who are suspected of free protein S deficiency. The performance of this device has not been established in neonate and pediatric patient populations.
The INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag assay is an immunoturbidimetric assay. The reagent kit consists of two components. One component (Reagent) contains polystyrene particles coated with two different monoclonal antibodies both specific for free protein S. This latex reagent aggregates when mixed with samples containing free protein S. The degree of aggregation is directly proportional to the concentration of free protein S in the test sample and is detected turbidimetrically via the increase in turbidity.
The provided document describes the Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH's INNOVANCE Free PS Ag device (K181525) and its performance data in support of its substantial equivalence to a predicate device.
Here's a breakdown of the requested information:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly present a single table of "acceptance criteria" against which all performance metrics are directly compared. Instead, it discusses various studies with implicit acceptance criteria (e.g., successful verification of LoQ, fulfillment of predetermined criteria for Passing-Bablok regression). I'll compile a table based on what can be inferred for key performance characteristics.
| Performance Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Inferred from study description) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Measuring Interval (Limit of Quantitation - LoQ) | Lower limit of 10% of norm must be accurately measurable with Total Error ≤ 4.0% of norm. | Successfully verified. Study confirms lower limit of 10% of norm can be accurately measured. |
| Measuring Interval (Linearity) | Maximal deviation from theoretical ideal linearity: ± 3.2% of norm for < 40% of norm, and ± 8.0% relative for ≥ 40 to 150% of norm. | Study supports linearity across the measuring range (10 to 150% of norm). |
| Specificity (Interference) | "No interference up to" indicated concentrations for various endogenous and exogenous substances. | Observed no interference up to the indicated concentrations for a wide range of substances (see detailed list in source text). Minimal interference from heterophile antibodies by added blocking reagent; however, complete elimination cannot be guaranteed. |
| Frozen vs. Fresh Samples (Bridging Study) | Predetermined acceptance criteria for Passing-Bablok regression and predicated bias from medical decision points (MDPs) were fulfilled. | Slope: 0.98, Intercept: 1.50, r: 0.999. Bias at MDPs: Combined 0.65%, Female 0.72%, Male 0.51%. |
| Precision (Single Site) | (Implicit: Acceptable CV values within common laboratory standards) | Within-Run CV: 0.47 - 5.29%, Between-Run CV: 0.00 - 2.09%, Between-Day CV: 0.00 - 1.40%, Total (Within-Site) CV: 0.76 - 5.48%. |
| Precision (Multi-Lot Single Site) | (Implicit: Acceptable CV values within common laboratory standards) | Within-Run CV: 0.54 - 2.63%, Between-Run CV: 0.00 - 1.47%, Between-Day CV: 0.00 - 0.50%, Between-Lot CV: 0.62 - 1.36%, Total (Combined Lots) CV: 1.05 - 2.82%. |
| Reproducibility (Multi-Site, One Lot) | (Implicit: Acceptable CV values within common laboratory standards) | Within-Run CV: 0.72 - 3.74%, Between-Run CV: 0.00 - 1.18%, Between-Day CV: 0.00 - 0.89%, Between-Site CV: 1.24 - 1.89%, Total (Combined Sites) CV: 2.10 - 4.08%. |
| Precision (Internal Site, 3 Analyzer/Operator) | (Implicit: Acceptable CV values within common laboratory standards) | Within-Run CV: 0.79 - 1.69%, Between-Run CV: 0.39 - 1.92%, Between-Day CV: 0.00 - 0.36%, Between-Instrument CV: 0.00 - 4.13%, Total (Combined Instruments) CV: 1.15 - 4.86%. |
| Method Comparison | Results from each application met the predetermined acceptance criteria (for Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plots). Device should perform comparably to predicate. | Combined Sites (N=350): $y = 0.95x + 4.92$, $r = 0.940$, $r^2 = 0.883$. Individual sites also showed strong correlation. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and the Data Provenance
The document describes several non-clinical and clinical studies, each with its own sample size and provenance.
- Measuring Interval (LoQ): Five independent low-analyte plasma pools.
- Measuring Interval (Linearity): Not explicitly stated as a number of individual samples, but involved a dilution series prepared from a high pool and a low pool to create 11 different dilutions.
- Specificity (Interference):
- Dose-response experiments: Used samples prepared with native plasma. Specific number of samples not given for each interferent.
- Paired-difference experiments: Used individual native samples with and without interferent. Panel of exogenous substances.
- Reference Interval: 300 ostensibly healthy subjects (149 males, 151 females). Provenance: Three clinical study sites in the United States. Prospective/Retrospective: The guidance followed (CLSI EP28-A3c) suggests a prospective collection for establishing reference intervals.
- Frozen versus Fresh Samples (Bridging Study): A minimum of 60 fresh individual plasma samples. Provenance: One external site in Germany. Prospective/Retrospective: Seems prospective for the sample collection and immediate testing, followed by freezing and re-testing.
- Precision / Reproducibility:
- Three plasma pools (Low, MDL, High) and two control materials (Control Plasma N, Control Plasma P).
- External Reproducibility (multi-site): Used these plasma pools/controls. Overall study involved 20 days, 2 runs/day, 2 replicates/run. Provenance: Two study sites in the U.S. (Site 1, Site 2) and one study site in Germany (Site 3).
- Internal Precision: Same plasma pools/controls. 5 days, 2 runs/day, 4 replicates/run. Provenance: Siemens company site in Germany (Site 4).
- Method Comparison: Total N = 350 patient samples.
- Distribution: 304 samples with clinical demand for protein S testing (137 suspected thrombophilia, 1 congenital protein S deficiency, 166 other reasons), 31 samples from patients with congenital Protein S deficiency (from commercial vendor), and 15 samples without clinical demand for Protein S testing.
- Provenance: Three external sites in the United States.
- Prospective/Retrospective: Used "fresh and frozen samples from patients ≥ 18 years of age," implying a mix or at least collection over time. The nature of "samples with clinical demand" and "samples from commercial vendor" suggests a mix, likely retrospective within patient cohorts or collected specifically for the study.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and the Qualifications of Those Experts
The document does not describe the use of "experts" to establish ground truth for the test set in the traditional sense of medical image or diagnostic interpretation. The device is an in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) for quantitative measurement of free protein S antigen. The "ground truth" for these types of devices is based on established laboratory methods, reference materials, or clinical diagnosis.
For the Method Comparison study, the predicate device (STA-Liatest Free Protein S) served as the comparator, with its results being the benchmark. The reference interval study established normal ranges based on testing ostensibly healthy subjects, not expert consensus on individual cases.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. This is an IVD device for quantitative measurement, not a diagnostic imaging or clinical decision-making algorithm that typically involves adjudication of expert interpretations for ground truth. The "adjudication" is inherent in the laboratory testing and statistical analysis methods (e.g., CLSI guidelines).
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs Without AI Assistance
Not applicable. This is an IVD device for quantifiable laboratory measurements and does not involve "human readers" or AI assistance in the interpretation of complex data (like medical images) that would require an MRMC study.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
Yes. All presented performance studies (Measuring Interval, Specificity, Frozen vs. Fresh Samples, Precision/Reproducibility, Method Comparison) represent the standalone performance of the INNOVANCE Free PS Ag assay on the Sysmex CS-5100 analyzer. The device provides a quantitative measurement, and its output is then interpreted by clinicians, but the device's performance itself is evaluated in isolation.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The type of "ground truth" varies by study:
- Measuring Interval (LoQ & Linearity): Established by demonstrating accurate measurement across known concentrations (dilutions or spiked samples).
- Specificity (Interference): Lack of interference at known concentrations of interfering substances.
- Reference Interval: Determined by measuring ostensibly healthy subjects and calculating statistical percentiles (2.5th – 97.5th percentile).
- Frozen versus Fresh Samples (Bridging Study): Comparison against results from the same samples tested fresh, serving as the immediate "truth."
- Precision / Reproducibility: Intrinsic variability of the assay measured by statistical methods like Coefficient of Variation (CV).
- Method Comparison: The results obtained from the legally marketed predicate device (STA-Liatest Free Protein S) served as the comparative "truth" or reference standard to establish substantial equivalence.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
The document does not specify a separate "training set" sample size. For IVD devices, a "training set" typically refers to the samples used during the development and optimization of the assay itself. This document focuses on the validation and verification of the finalized device's performance. The studies detailed are performance evaluations, not descriptions of the assay's developmental phase.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
As mentioned above, a "training set" is not explicitly defined or detailed in this submission. For an IVD like this, the "ground truth" during development would be established through a combination of:
- Reference materials: Known concentrations of free protein S.
- Clinical samples: Samples from patients with known protein S levels or deficiencies (diagnosed through other means, e.g., clinical presentation, other laboratory tests).
- Pathology/Biochemistry: Using established gold-standard biochemical assays or methods to determine free protein S concentrations in development samples.
The document implicitly relies on the established understanding of protein S biology and its measurement principles for its development and the subsequent performance validation against a predicate device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
September 7, 2018
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH Petra Dissmann Regulatory Affairs Manager Emil-von-Behring Strasse 76 35041 Marburg, Germany
Re: K181525
Trade/Device Name: INNOVANCE Free PS Ag Regulation Number: 21 CFR 864.7290 Regulation Name: Factor deficiency test Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GGP Dated: June 6, 2018 Received: June 11, 2018
Dear Petra Dissmann:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You mav, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be avare that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807): labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Leonthena R. Carrington -S
Lea Carrington Director Division of Immunology and Hematology Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K181525
Device Name INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag
Indications for Use (Describe)
For the quantitative determination of free protein S antigen in human plasma collected from venous blood samples in 3.2% sodium citrate tubes on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer.
As an aid in the diagnosis of protein S deficiency in patients who are suspected of free protein S deficiency. The performance of this device has not been established in neonate and pediatric patient populations.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---|---|
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR §807.92 and follows the FDA guidance 'The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications [510(k)]', issued July 28, 2014.
1. Submitter
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH
| Emil-von-Behring-Str. 76 | |
|---|---|
| 35041 Marburg, Germany | |
| Contact Person: | Dr. Petra M. Dissmann |
| Email: | petra.dissmann@siemens-healthineers.com |
| Phone: | + 49 172 369 245 9 |
| Facsimile: | + 49 642 139 497 7 |
| Date Prepared: | July 19, 2018 |
| 2. DeviceName of Device: | INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag (K181525) |
| Common or Usual Name: | Test, qualitative and quantitative factor deficiency |
| Classification Name: | Factor deficiency test(21 CFR 864.7290) |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | GGP |
| 510(k) Review Panel | Hematology |
| 3. Predicate DeviceName of Device: | STA®-Liatest® Free Protein S (K010963) |
| Common or Usual Name: | Test, qualitative and quantitative factor deficiency |
| Classification Name: | Factor deficiency test(21 CFR 864.7290) |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | GGP |
| 510(k) Review Panel | Hematology |
Two recalls associated with the predicate reagent were found on the FDA Medical Device Recalls database. However, the recalls were specific to assignment ranges of specific production lots. These lots were not used in the generation of data for this 510(k); they have no bearing on the content of this premarket notification. No reference devices were used in this submission.
{4}------------------------------------------------
4. Device Description / Test Principle
The INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag assay is an immunoturbidimetric assay. The reagent kit consists of two components. One component (Reagent) contains polystyrene particles coated with two different monoclonal antibodies both specific for free protein S. This latex reagent aggregates when mixed with samples containing free protein S. The degree of aggregation is directly proportional to the concentration of free protein S in the test sample and is detected turbidimetrically via the increase in turbidity.
Protein S is a vitamin K-dependent plasma protein that is mainly synthesized by the liver. During blood coagulation, protein S exhibits an essential anticoagulant function by acting as a cofactor of activated protein C (APC). In the presence of calcium, protein S forms a complex with APC that binds to phospholipid surfaces and accelerates the APC-catalyzed proteolytic inactivation of the factors Va and VIIIa. Protein S circulates in human blood with a half-life of about 2 days at a plasma concentration of about 25 mg/L. Approximately 60% of the protein is non-covalently bound to C4b-binding protein (C4BP), a regulator of the classical complement pathway. The remaining approx. 40% of the total protein S fraction, i.e. free protein S, represent the physiologically active form that primarily exhibits APC-cofactor activity. Inherited or acquired deficiency of protein S is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism.
Inherited protein S deficiencies are classified into three types:
- type I is defined by a reduction in both total and free protein S levels (quantitative defect).
- . type II is rare and characterized by a decreased protein S activity but normal levels of total and free protein S (qualitative defect),
- . type III corresponds to normal levels of total protein S but low levels of free protein S (quantitative defect).
Homozygous and heterozygous deficiencies of protein S are rare and commonly lead to purpura fulminans in neonates.
Acquired protein S deficiencies, indicated by decreased free protein S levels, may be caused by:
- hepatic disorders
- . nephrotic syndrome
- oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists
- L-asparaginase treatment
- . pregnancy
- oral contraceptives
- . estrogen therapy
- . viral infections
- disseminated intravascular coagulation
- . elevated plasma levels of C4BP in an acute-phase reaction.
Newborns may also have decreased levels of free protein S.
{5}------------------------------------------------
5. Intended Use / Indications for Use
For the quantitative determination of free protein S antigen in human plasma collected from venous blood samples in 3.2% sodium citrate tubes on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer.
As an aid in the diagnosis of protein S deficiency in patients who are suspected of free protein S deficiency.
The performance of this device has not been established in neonate and pediatric patient populations.
6. Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device
- A) Assay
| Similarities between INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag and STA®-Liatest® Free Protein S | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Proposed DeviceINNOVANCE® Free PS Ag | Predicate Device (K010963)STA®-Liatest® Free Protein S | |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative determinationof free protein S antigen in humanplasma collected from venousblood samples in 3.2% sodiumcitrate tubes on the SYSMEX CS-5100 analyzer. | The STA®-Liatest® Free Protein S kitsare intended for use on STA-R® andSTA Compact® for the antigenic assayof free protein S in plasma by theimmune-turbidimetric method. | |
| Indications forUse | As an aid in the diagnosis of protein Sdeficiency in patients who aresuspected of free protein S deficiency.The performance of this device has notbeen established in neonate andpediatric patient populations. | Not specified in package insert | |
| Test Principle | Immuno-turbidimetry | Same | |
| Protein S typedetected(specificity) | Free protein S | Same | |
| Sample Type | Human plasma,3.2% sodium citrate | Same |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Similarities between INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag and STA®-Liatest® Free Protein S | ||
|---|---|---|
| Item | Proposed DeviceINNOVANCE® Free PS Ag | Predicate Device (K010963)STA®-Liatest® Free Protein S |
| Control Level | 2 Control levels(sold separately from the assay): | 2 Control levels(sold separately from the assay): |
| Control Plasma N(K042333, normal range) | STA®-Liatest® Control N(normal range) | |
| Control Plasma P(K042209, pathological range) | STA®-Liatest® Control P(pathological range) | |
| Units | % of norm | Same |
| Storage | Until expiration date printed on each vialand carton at 2 – 8°C | Until expiration date indicated on thebox label, when stored at2 – 8°C |
| MeasuringInterval | 10 - 150% of norm | Same |
| Composition | Liquid[polystyrene particles (latex) coated withtwo different monoclonal antibodiesboth specific for free protein S] | Liquid(latex microparticles coated by covalentbonding with monoclonal antibodiesspecific for free protein S) |
| Stability / ShelfLife | 12 months according to 510(k) data | Not specified in package insert |
| Stability OnceOpened | 8 weeks at 2 – 8°C | Not specified in package insert |
| Differences between INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag and STA®-Liatest® Free Protein S | ||
|---|---|---|
| Item | Proposed DeviceINNOVANCE® Free PS Ag | Predicate Device (K010963)STA®-Liatest® Free Protein S |
| Buffer | Buffered saline solution containingheterophilic blocking reagent for minimizinginterferences by heterophilic antibodies andrheumatoid factors. | HEPES buffer |
| On Board Stability | 96 hours | 32 hours (in original vials)5 days (with STA® - miniReducer and the perforated cap |
| High Dose HookEffect | The INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag assayon the SYSMEX® CS-5100 systemshows no high dose hook effect up to588% of norm free protein S. | No dose-hook effect has beenobserved with free protein Slevels up to 200%. |
.
{7}------------------------------------------------
B) Calibrator
Г
| Comparison between Calibrators | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Proposed DeviceINNOVANCE® Free PS Ag | Predicate Device (K010963)STA®-Liatest® Free Protein S | |
| Intended Use | Standard Human Plasma is used forthe calibration of the followingcoagulation and fibrinolysis tests:1. Prothrombin time (PT)2. Fibrinogen (Clauss method)3. Coagulation factors II, V, VII,VIII, IX, X, XI, XII and VWF4. Inhibitors: Antithrombin III,protein C, protein S, a2-antiplasmin5. PlasminogenThe percentage values given in theenclosed table of values relate to apool of fresh citrated human plasma,which by definition, exhibits 100 %of norm for all the factors.Coagulation factors and inhibitors forwhich a WHO Standard is availableare referenced to this standard andthe values are given in InternationalUnits (IU). | Unknown | |
| Matrix | Normal human plasma (lyophilized) | Unknown | |
| Directly traceable toWHO Standard | Yes | Information given in the instructionsfor use of the predicate:Kit reagents are pre-calibratedagainst a secondary standard of the03/228 International Standard forfree protein S established in 2006. | |
| Calibration Curve | Standard Human Plasma (K023141,calibrator sold separately from theassay) is diluted automatically by theinstrument used. The respectivelevels are defined by the actualconcentration of free protein S in theStandard Human Plasma lot asprovided in the enclosed Table ofAnalytical Values, and by thesystem-specific dilution settingsfor calibration (6-point-calibrationcurve on the Sysmex® CS-5100). | Information given in the instructionsfor use of the predicate:To enter the calibration curve on theanalyzer, the barcode printed on theAssay Value insert has to be scannedwith the instrument barcode reader.The calibration curve is validatedsubsequently after the two controllevels are determined on theanalyzer. | |
| Comparison between Calibrators | |||
| Item | Proposed DeviceINNOVANCE® Free PS Ag | Predicate Device (K010963)STA®-Liatest® Free Protein S | |
| Stability / Shelf Life | 12 month according to 510(k) data | Unknown | |
| On Board Stability | Because calibrators are intended tobe used immediately, Siemens doesnot claim the on-board stability ofStandard Human Plasma in thelabeling. | Unknown | |
| Stability afterReconstitution | 4 hours stored at 15 to 25 °C and 4weeks stored at -20 °C | Unknown |
{8}------------------------------------------------
The above described differences do not raise new questions as to safety and effectiveness of the new device.
7. Performance Data
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
7.1. Non-Clinical Studies
7.1.1. Measuring Interval (Limit of Quantitation and Linearity)
The measuring interval of the application was established with respect to the results of the limit of quantitation (LoQ) and the linearity study.
The LoQ study was carried out in accordance with the CLSI document EP17-A2 'Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline-Second Edition', chapter 6. The verification of the LoO was performed with five independent low-analyte plasma pools. Normal plasma pools were diluted with commercial protein S deficient plasma. The free protein S concentrations of these plasma pools were determined with INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer to be between 7.68 to 7.91% of norm.
The LoO candidate (< 10% of norm) was successfully verified allowing a maximum Total Error of ≤ 4.0% of norm. The study result confirms that the lower limit of the measuring interval (10% of norm) can be accurately measured with the proposed device.
The linearity study was performed in accordance with the CLSI document EP06-A 'Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach . The linearity of the application was evaluated across the measuring range (10 to 150% of norm). A dilution series was prepared using a sample beyond the intended measuring interval (high pool) and a
{9}------------------------------------------------
sample below the expected LoQ (low pool) to equal 11 different dilutions spanning a free protein S concentration of 7 to 183% of norm. To estimate the deviation from the theoretical ideal linearity, the deviation between the linear regression model and the best fitting polynomial regression model was calculated for each sample concentration. The respective acceptance criteria 'maximal deviation' was predefined with a maximal deviation of ± 3.2% of norm for dilution levels < 40% of norm and ± 8.0% relative for dilution levels ≥ 40 to 150% of norm. Based on the results of the LoQ and linearity study, the measuring interval for the INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag assay was established as 10 to 150% of norm.
7.1.2. Specificity
The effects of potentially interfering substances were investigated in interference studies according to CLSI document EP07-A2 'Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline - Second Edition'.
Dose-response experiments were carried out to determine the degree of interference as a function of the interferent concentration for endogenous interferents (hemoglobin, not conjugated bilirubin, conjugated bilirubin, platelets, cholesterol and fibrinogen) and for known exogenous interferents (Dalteparin sodium, Danaparoid sodium, Enoxaparin sodium, Unfractionated heparin). The interferent test concentrations were investigated in the low level of the free protein S concentration (10 to 30% of norm), in the medical decision range (approximately 60 to 70% of norm) and in the high range (100 to 130% of norm). Each sample was prepared with native plasma. The evaluation regarding the endogenous interferents triglycerides (lipids), human antimouse antibodies and rheumatoid factors was carried out with single native plamas.
Paired-difference experiments were carried out to evaluate the amount of interferent up to which no interference is to be expected. Individual native samples with and without interferent were compared within the studies. Such interference testing was performed with a panel of exogenous substances including Over-the-Counter and Prescription Drugs.
| Interferent | No interference up to |
|---|---|
| Hemoglobin | 1 000 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin ( not conjugated) | 80 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin (conjugated) | 80 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides* | 961.5 mg/dL |
| Cholesterol | 788.8 mg/dL |
| Fibrinogen | 13 g/dL |
| Platelets (fresh or frozen plasma) | 19.9 x 107/ mL |
| Rheumatoid Factors | 2 500 IU/mL |
| Interferent | No interference up to |
| Acarbose | 150 mg/L |
| Acetyl salicylic acid | 300 mg/L |
| Amiodarone hydrochloride | 7.5 µg/mL |
| Amitriptyline | 600 µg/mL |
| Amoxicillin | 45 µg/mL |
| Apixaban | 1050 ng/mL |
| Argatroban | 1350 ng/mL |
| Atorvastatin calcium salt trihydrate | 75 ng/mL |
| Bisoprolol fumarate | 0.35 mg/mL |
| Bivalidrudin trifluoro acetate salt | 1050 ng/mL |
| Carbamazepin | 30 µg/mL |
| Carbapanem (Imipenem monohydrat) | 150 mg/L |
| Ciprofloxacin | 24 mg/L |
| Citalopram x HBr | 330 µg/mL |
| Clarithromycin | 30 mg/L |
| Clopidogrel hydrogensulfate | 9.0 mg/L |
| Dabigatran | 1500 ng/mL |
| Dalteparin sodium | 15 IU/mL |
| Danaparoid sodium | 15 IU/mL |
| Diclofenac sodium salt | 60 mg/L |
| Digoxin | 6.0 µg/mL |
| Enoxaparin sodium | 15 IU/mL |
| Estrogene | 510 pg/mL |
| Etilefrine hydrochloride | 30 µg/mL |
| Folic acid | 24 U/mL |
| Fondaparinux sodium salt | 3.0 mg/L |
| Furosemide solution | 30 ng/mL |
| Ibuprofen sodium salt | 560 mg/L |
| Ketoconazole | 4.5 mg/L |
| L-Asparaginase | 0.009 mg/mL |
| Lisinopril Dihydrat | 24 mg/L |
| Metformin hydrochloride | 3.9 mg/L |
| N-Acetyl-4-aminophenol | 300 mg/L |
| Pantoprazole sodium sesquihydrate | 15 mg/L |
| Phenobarbital | 90 µg/mL |
| Prasugrel | 2400 ng/mL |
| Interferent | No interference up to |
| Progesteron | 3.0 ng/mL |
| Ramipril | 0.12 mg/mL |
| Rivaroxaban | 1200 ng/mL |
| Ticagrelor | 0.108 mg/mL |
| Torasemid | 9.0 ng/mL |
| Unfractionated heparin, sodium salt | 15 IU/mL |
| Valproic acid | 300 µg/mL |
| Valsartan | 450 ng/mL |
| Verapamil hydrochloride | 1050 ng/mL |
| Warfarin | 15 µg/mL |
Following concentrations of listed endogenous substances were found to cause no interference up to the indicated concentrations:
*Evaluated with native lipemic samples.
Patient samples may contain heterophile antibodies (e. g. human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) or rheumatoid factors) that could react in immunoassays to give a falsely elevated or depressed
{10}------------------------------------------------
result. INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag has been designed to minimize interference from heterophile antibodies by addition of a blocking reagent. Nevertheless, complete elimination of this interference from all patient specimens cannot be guaranteed.
In addition, no interferences up to the indicated concentrations of following exogenous substances were observed:
{11}------------------------------------------------
The following drugs were investigated regarding their potential interference: Harvoni® (ledipasvir and sofosbuvir), Zepatier® (elbasvir and grazoprevir), Epivir-HBV® (lamivudine), Edurant® (rilpivirine). Aptivus® (tipranavir) and Isentress® (raltegravir). No interference could be observed when evaluating plasma samples spiked with the respective drug at a quantity based on the daily prescribed dosage.
7.2. Clinical Studies
7.2.1. Reference Interval
Reference interval studies were conducted at three clinical study sites in the United States with ostensibly healthy subjects aged ≥ 18 years of age following the guidance of CLSI document EP28-A3c 'Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline – Third Edition'. The summary is provided below. The study population did not include neonate and pediatric sample populations.
| Reference Interval Study forINNOVANCE® Free PS Ag on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | N | 2.5th - 97.5th percentile(% of norm) | ||
| Males | 149 | 72.8 – 138.8 | ||
| Females without oral contraception,hormone replacement therapy or pregnancy | 151 | 65.8 – 146.7 |
7.2.2. Frozen versus Fresh Samples (Bridging Study)
To demonstrate that test results of INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag are not affected by freezing and thawing of the specimens, a bridging study was performed for the comparison between test results obtained with frozen or fresh plasma samples.
The study was performed at one external site in Germany. A minimum of 60 fresh individual plasma samples covering at least 80% of the measuring interval of INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag
{12}------------------------------------------------
(10 to 150% of norm) were measured on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer within four (4) hours after blood collection. One aliquot of each sample was stored for at least seven (7) days at < -74 ℃. The aliquots were thawed and measured. To ensure that the study did not introduce bias, one reagent lot was used to exclude reagent lot-to-lot variability.
Results were analyzed by both Passing-Bablok regression analysis and Bland Altman analysis. The predetermined acceptance criteria for Passing-Bablok regression and predicated bias from medical decision points (MDPs) were fulfilled.
The study results of the frozen versus fresh samples bridging study is presented in the following table:
| Results of the Frozen versus Fresh Samples Bridging Study forINNOVANCE® Free PS Ag on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Slope | Intercept(% of norm) | r | r2 | Gender | MPDs(% of norm) | Bias(% relative) |
| 66 | 0.98 | 1.50 | 0.999 | 0.998 | Combined | 67.9 | 0.65 |
| Female | 65.8 | 0.72 | |||||
| Male | 72.8 | 0.51 |
7.2.3. Precision / Reproducibility
A precision (single site) and reproducibility (multi-site) study was performed in accordance with the CLSI document EP05-A3 'Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline - Third Edition' to investigate the precision performance characteristics of INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer. The reproducibility investigation was performed in a multi-center study, including two study sites in the U.S. (Site 1 and Site 2) and one study site in Germany (Site 3). The precision investigation was performed internally at the Siemens company site in Germany (Site 4). Three plasma pools (Low, MDL, High) as well as two control materials (Control Plasma N, Control Plasma P) were investigated as test samples were chosen to cover the respective measuring interval of INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag (10 to 150% of norm) and the medical decision level. The plasma pools were prepared at the Siemens company site and sent frozen to the external study sites for testing with the two control materials following routine operation and calibration. The order of samples and control materials for each run and day varied to avoid an inherent bias to the study.
The external reproducibility study was carried out on twenty (20) days, with two (2) runs per day and two (2) replicates of each sample per run (20x2x2) on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer. Site 1 performed the reproducibility study with three (3) different reagent/calibrator lots; the other two (2) external sites (Site 2 and Site 3) used one (1) reagent/calibrator lot. The results are presented in the following tables:
{13}------------------------------------------------
| INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer:Evaluation of 20x2x2 Precision Study at Single Sites. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV (%) | ||||
| Study Site | Within-Run | Between-Run | Between-Day | Total(Within-Site) |
| Site 1 | 0.47 - 2.78 | 0.00 - 2.09 | 0.00 - 0.76 | 0.76 - 2.79 |
| Site 2 | 0.52 - 2.54 | 0.00 - 0.65 | 0.00 - 0.34 | 0.58 - 2.56 |
| Site 3 | 1.01 - 5.29 | 0.00 - 1.87 | 0.09 - 1.40 | 1.14 - 5.48 |
| INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer:Evaluation of 20x2x2 Precision Study with three Lots at one Single Site. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV (%) | ||||
| Within-Run | Between-Run | Between-Day | Between-Lot | Total(Combined Lots) |
| 0.54 - 2.63 | 0.00 - 1.47 | 0.00 - 0.50 | 0.62 - 1.36 | 1.05 - 2.82 |
| INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer:Evaluation of 20x2x2 Reproducibility Study with one Lot at three Sites combined. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV (%) | ||||
| Within-Run | Between-Run | Between-Day | Between-Site | Total(Combined Sites) |
| 0.72 - 3.74 | 0.00 - 1.18 | 0.00 - 0.89 | 1.24 - 1.89 | 2.10 - 4.08 |
{14}------------------------------------------------
The internal precision study was carried out on five (5) days, with two (2) runs per day and four (4) replicates of each sample per run (5x2x4) on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer. The internal site performed the precision study with three (3) different Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzers, three (3) different operators and one (1) reagent/calibrator lot. The results are presented in the following table:
| INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer:Evaluation of 5x2x4 Precision Study withone Lot and three Analyzer/Operator combinations at Internal Site. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV (%) | ||||
| Within-Run | Between-Run | Between-Day | Between-instrument | Total(CombinedInstruments) |
| 0.79 - 1.69 | 0.39 - 1.92 | 0.00 - 0.36 | 0.00 - 4.13 | 1.15 - 4.86 |
7.2.4. Method comparison
Method comparison studies designed according to EP09-A3 CLSI Guideline 'Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline-Third Edition' were conducted at three external sites in the United States, all sites using the same protocol.
Samples were measured on both the predicate device (STA® Liatest® Free Protein S on the STA-R Evolution® Expert Series Hemostasis System) as well as on the proposed device (INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer), in random order to eliminate any inherent bias. The samples tested ensured the intended use population was tested, including representative patient samples from various demographics like race, gender, and ages. The study was performed with fresh and frozen samples from patients ≥ 18 years of age.
| Distribution of Intended Use Population (Total N = 350) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samples with clinical demand for protein S testing(suspected protein S deficiency or suspectedthrombophilia) | Samples from patientswith congenital ProteinS deficiency as assessedby commercial vendor | Samples from patientswithout clinical demandfor Protein S testing | ||
| 304 | ||||
| Suspected thrombophilia | Congenitalprotein Sdeficiency | Otherreasons | 31 | 15 |
| 137 | 1 | 166 |
{15}------------------------------------------------
Results were compared by Passing-Bablok regression analysis as well as Bland-Altman plots. Results from each application met the predetermined acceptance criteria. The following summary of Passing-Bablok regression shows that the proposed and predicate devices provide equivalent results when used in a clinical setting.
| Method Comparison Results (Passing-Bablok Regression);proposed device = INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer andpredicate device = STA® Liatest® Free Protein S on the STA-R Evolution® Expert SeriesHemostasis System | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Site | 2nd Site | 3rd Site | Sites Combined |
| N = 119 | N = 119 | N = 112 | N = 350 |
| $y = 0.85 x - 6.34$ | $y = 0.95 x - 5.70$ | $y = 1.00 x + 3.31$ | $y =0.95 x + 4.92$ |
| $r = 0.941$ | $r = 0.962$ | $r = 0.949$ | $r = 0.940$ |
| $(r^2 = 0.886)$ | $(r^2 = 0.926)$ | $(r^2 = 0.900)$ | $(r^2 = 0.883)$ |
8. Conclusions
The predicate device was cleared based in part on the results of clinical studies; therefore clinical testing was required to support substantial equivalence.
The non-clinical and clinical data support the safety of the device.
The clinical data demonstrate that the INNOVANCE® Free PS Ag on the Sysmex® CS-5100 analyzer performs comparably to the predicate device (STA® Liatest® Free Protein S on the STA R Evolution® Expert Series Hemostasis System) that is currently marketed for the same intended use.
The data submitted for this premarket notification demonstrates that the device raises no new concerns as to safety and effectiveness when compared to the predicate device, and is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
§ 864.7290 Factor deficiency test.
(a)
Identification. A factor deficiency test is a device used to diagnose specific coagulation defects, to monitor certain types of therapy, to detect coagulation inhibitors, and to detect a carrier state (a person carrying both a recessive gene for a coagulation factor deficiency such as hemophilia and the corresponding normal gene).(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).