(241 days)
Not Found
No
The device description and performance studies focus on the physical properties and functional performance of a thermoplastic nozzle, with no mention of AI or ML technologies.
Yes.
The device is intended for the non-surgical removal of subgingival plaque in pockets up to 5 mm after initial periodontal treatment to address periodontal disease. This active treatment to alleviate a disease state classifies it as therapeutic.
No
The device is described as being used for the "non-surgical removal of subgingival plaque," which is a treatment not a diagnostic function.
No
The device is a physical accessory (nozzle) made of thermoplastic material, not software. The description details its physical characteristics, markings, and how it interacts with other hardware components (handpieces and dental units).
Based on the provided information, this device is not an IVD (In Vitro Diagnostic).
Here's why:
- IVD Definition: In Vitro Diagnostics are devices intended for use in the collection, preparation, and examination of specimens taken from the human body (such as blood, urine, or tissue) to provide information for the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of disease.
- Device Function: The PERIO-FLOW nozzle is a dental accessory used in the mouth to physically remove subgingival plaque. It does not analyze specimens taken from the body.
- Intended Use: The intended use is for the "non-surgical removal of subgingival plaque," which is a physical treatment, not a diagnostic test.
The device is a medical device, specifically a dental accessory, but it does not fit the definition of an In Vitro Diagnostic.
N/A
Intended Use / Indications for Use
The PERIO-FLOW nozzle, used with EMS PERIO-FLOW dental handpieces, is intended for patients suffering from periodontal disease.
The PERIO-FLOW nozzle, used with EMS PERIO-FLOW dental handpieces, is indicated for the non-surgical removal of subgingival plaque in pockets up to 5 mm after initial periodontal treatment.
Product codes (comma separated list FDA assigned to the subject device)
EFB
Device Description
The PERIO-FLOW nozzle is a flexible, thermoplastic accessory to the PERIO-FLOW handpiece that is used with the EMS AIR-FLOW devices such as AIR-FLOW MASTER, AIR-FLOW MASTER PIEZON and AIR-FLOW handy PERIO and AIR-FLOW handy 3.0 Perio. The PERIO-FLOW nozzle includes printed markings and is molded from an alternate version of the cleared thermoplastic polyester elastomer. The marks are arranged to ensure that the user is aware of the location of the tip with respect to the pocket. There is a mark at 3 mm and 5 mm so that the user can evaluate the location of the tip during a procedure. The 5mm mark is bolder to indicate the depth limit. The line and the square located above the 5 mm line serve to ensure that the user does not insert the nozzle deeper than 5mm in the pocket. The PERIO-FLOW nozzle is provided non-sterile. The nozzle is single use only and is intended for use under clean conditions.
The principle of operation of the proposed PERIO-FLOW nozzle is identical to predicate device nozzle (DT-113) which was cleared with the predicate system AIR-FLOW handy 3.0 PERIO (K132480 cleared on 02/24/2014).
EMS dental handpieces connect to a standard turbine connection on a dental operative unit and deliver a mixture of water, air, and the prophylaxis powder to a treatment site. The air /powder mixture exits the distal end of the PERIO-FLOW handpiece through the PERIO-FLOW nozzle where it meets with a water spray in the pocket.
Mentions image processing
Not Found
Mentions AI, DNN, or ML
Not Found
Input Imaging Modality
Not Found
Anatomical Site
Teeth and soft tissues in the mouth.
Indicated Patient Age Range
Not Found
Intended User / Care Setting
Not Found
Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol
Not Found
Summary of Performance Studies (study type, sample size, AUC, MRMC, standalone performance, key results)
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
Biocompatibility testing:
The biocompatibility evaluation for the PERIO-FLOW nozzle was conducted in accordance with the FDA guidance Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" (Attachment A) published June 16, 2016. This device is categorized in ISO 10993-1:2009 as "Surface device breached or compromised surface" per section 5.2.1(c). The device will have limited contact of less than or equal to 24 hours. Testing completed on this device includes:
- Cytotoxicity
- Sensitization
- Irritation
Comparison Testing:
To verify that the nozzles will work with the specified dental handpieces, comparison testing was completed on the current material (predicate) and the new material (this submission) for the nozzle. Comparison testing consisted of measuring connection force, pressure resistance, and nozzle fixation.
To verify that the change of material does not impact the performance on the nozzle, functional testing was completed on the current material (predicate) and the new material (this submission) for the nozzle. Functional testing consisted of confirming the placement of powder exit holes on the nozzle, the direction of powder exits, and the durability of the markings.
All tests were successfully performed and all acceptance criteria were met.
Key Metrics (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, etc.)
Not Found
Predicate Device(s): If the device was cleared using the 510(k) pathway, identify the Predicate Device(s) K/DEN number used to claim substantial equivalence and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text. List the primary predicate first in the list.
Reference Device(s): Identify the Reference Device(s) K/DEN number and list them here in a comma separated list exactly as they appear in the text.
Not Found
Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information for the subject device only (e.g. presence / absence, what scope was granted / cleared under the PCCP, any restrictions, etc).
Not Found
§ 872.4200 Dental handpiece and accessories.
(a)
Identification. A dental handpiece and accessories is an AC-powered, water-powered, air-powered, or belt-driven, hand-held device that may include a foot controller for regulation of speed and direction of rotation or a contra-angle attachment for difficult to reach areas intended to prepare dental cavities for restorations, such as fillings, and for cleaning teeth.(b)
Classification. Class I.
0
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
E.M.S. Electro Medical Systems S.A. c/o Christina Henza Regulatory Can-Do-Medical 31 CH. de la Vuarpillière CH - 1260 Nyon Switzerland
December 18, 2017
Re: K171174
Trade/Device Name: PERIO-FLOW nozzle Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.4200 Regulation Name: Dental Handpiece And Accessories Regulatory Class: Class I Product Code: EFB Dated: November 17, 2017 Received: November 17, 2017
Dear Christina Henza:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820);
1
and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Mary S. Runner -S
For Tina Kiang, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology. General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
2
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name PERIO-FLOW nozzle
Indications for Use (Describe)
The PERIO-FLOW nozzle, used with EMS PERIO-FLOW dental handpieces, is intended for patients suffering from periodontal disease.
The PERIO-FLOW nozzle, used with EMS PERIO-FLOW dental handpieces, is indicated for the non-surgical removal of subgingival plaque in pockets up to 5 mm after initial periodontal treatment.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
---|---|
------------------------------------------------- | -- |
× | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
3
510 (K) SUMMARY FOR PERIO-FLOW nozzle
- SUBMITTTER/ 510(K) HOLDER l. E.M.S. Electro Medical Systems S.A. Ch. de la Vuarpillière 31 CH - 1260 Nyon Switzerland
Primary Contact:
Suzanne FASSIO-HARDY, Regulatory Affairs Manager – Dental Direct: +41 22 99 44 771 Email: sfassiohardy@ems-ch.com
Submission Contact:
Christina Henza chenza@can-do-medical.com
- II. Date Prepared: December 14, 2017
- III. DEVICE NAME
Proprietary Name: PERIO-FLOW nozzle Common/Usual Name: Accessories Classification Name: Dental Handpiece and Accessories (872.4200) Device Class: I Product Code: EFB
-
IV. PREDICATE DEVICES
Primary Predicate: E.M.S. Electro Medical Systems S.A., AIR-FLOW handy 3.0 PERIO (K132480 cleared on 02/24/2014 -
V. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The PERIO-FLOW nozzle is a flexible, thermoplastic accessory to the PERIO-FLOW handpiece that is used with the EMS AIR-FLOW devices such as AIR-FLOW MASTER, AIR-FLOW MASTER PIEZON and AIR-FLOW handy PERIO and AIR-FLOW handy 3.0 Perio. The PERIO-FLOW nozzle includes printed markings and is molded from an alternate version of the cleared thermoplastic polyester elastomer. The marks are arranged to ensure that the user is aware of the location of the tip with respect to the pocket. There is a
4
mark at 3 mm and 5 mm so that the user can evaluate the location of the tip during a procedure. The 5mm mark is bolder to indicate the depth limit. The line and the square located above the 5 mm line serve to ensure that the user does not insert the nozzle deeper than 5mm in the pocket. The PERIO-FLOW nozzle is provided non-sterile. The nozzle is single use only and is intended for use under clean conditions.
The principle of operation of the proposed PERIO-FLOW nozzle is identical to predicate device nozzle (DT-113) which was cleared with the predicate system AIR-FLOW handy 3.0 PERIO (K132480 cleared on 02/24/2014).
EMS dental handpieces connect to a standard turbine connection on a dental operative unit and deliver a mixture of water, air, and the prophylaxis powder to a treatment site. The air /powder mixture exits the distal end of the PERIO-FLOW handpiece through the PERIO-FLOW nozzle where it meets with a water spray in the pocket.
VI. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The PERIO-FLOW nozzle, used with EMS PERIO-FLOW dental handpieces, is intended for patients suffering from periodontal disease.
The PERIO-FLOW nozzle, used with EMS PERIO-FLOW dental handpieces, is indicated for the non-surgical removal of subgingival plaque in pockets up to 5 mm after initial periodontal treatment.
VII. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPOSED COMPARED TO THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The proposed PERIO-FLOW nozzle is an additional accessory intended to be used with all currently available EMS PERIO-FLOW dental handpieces. The substantial equivalence claim is specific to the nozzle accessory within the predicate submission, all other system components are unaffected by this submission.
At a high level, the subject and predicate devices are based on the following same technological elements:
- . Nozzle Geometry (general shape and hole placement)
- . Projection of water/air/powder mixture
- Use with PERIO (Glycine) powder
The following technological differences exist between the subject and predicate devices:
- . The material is a different thermoplastic polyester elastomer
- . The subject device includes printed markings
The questions regarding the material change and addition of markings are whether it is biocompatible and whether the use is adequately described within the instructions. These questions apply to both the new device and the predicate. Therefore, the proposed device, PERIO-FLOW nozzle, is substantially equivalent with regards to the nozzle portion of the legally marketed predicate AIR-FLOW handy 3.0 PERIO (K132480 cleared on 02/24/2014).
5
Substantial Equivalence Table | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Item for Comparison | Proposed Device | |||
(PERIO-FLOW Nozzle DT-476) | Predicate Device | |||
(PERIO-FLOW Nozzle DT-113) | Explanation of | |||
Variation | ||||
Regulatory Information | Name | PERIO-FLOW nozzle | EMS AIR-FLOW handy 3.0 PERIO | N/A |
510(k)# | K171174 | K132480 | N/A | |
Predicates | K132480 | K082791 | N/A | |
Product Code | EFB | EFB | Same. | |
Class | 1 | 1 | Same. | |
Combination Product | No | No | Same. | |
Regulation Number | 872.4200 | 872.4200 | Same. | |
Regulation Generic | ||||
Name | Dental Handpiece and | |||
Accessories | Dental Handpiece and Accessories | Same. | ||
Intended use | Regulation Intended | |||
Use | "to prepare dental cavities for | |||
restorations, such as fillings, and | ||||
for cleaning teeth." | "to prepare dental cavities for | |||
restorations, such as fillings, and for | ||||
cleaning teeth." | Same. | |||
Indications | The PERIO-FLOW nozzle, used | |||
with EMS PERIO-FLOW dental | ||||
handpieces, is intended for | ||||
patients suffering from | ||||
periodontal disease. |
The PERIO-FLOW nozzle, used
with EMS PERIO-FLOW dental
handpieces, is indicated for the
non-surgical removal of
subgingival plaque in pockets up
to 5 mm after initial periodontal
treatment. | The AIR-FLOW handy 3.0 PERIO is
intended for patients suffering from
periodontal disease.
The AIR-FLOW handy 3.0 PERIO is
indicated for the non-surgical
removal of subgingival plaque in
pockets up to 5 mm after initial
periodontal treatment. | Same. |
| | Treatment Site | Subgingival | Subgingival | Same. |
| | Anatomical sites | Teeth and soft tissues in the
mouth. | Teeth and soft tissues in the mouth | Same. |
| | Specific Treatment
site | Subgingival | Subgingival | Same. |
| | Contact duration | Limited ≤ 24 hours | Limited ≤ 24 hours | Same. |
| | Biocompatibility | Biocompatible | Biocompatible | Same. |
| | Material | Thermoplastic Polyester
Elastomer
Ink (printed markings) | Thermoplastic Polyester Elastomer | Equivalent. |
| | Sterility | Provided non-sterile | Provided non-sterile | Same. |
| | Shelf life | unrestricted | unrestricted | Same. |
| Technological Characteristics | General purpose | Cleaning and surface preparation | Cleaning and surface preparation | Same. |
| | Treatment | Air-polishing | Air-polishing | Same. |
| | Mechanism of
treatment | Projection of water/air/powder
mixture | Projection of water/air/powder
mixture | Same. |
| | Compatible
Prophylaxis
Powders | PERIO (Glycine) | PERIO (Glycine) | Same. |
| | Mode | continuous operation | continuous operation | Same. |
| | Service pressure to
the turbine | 1 to 2.2 bar (1000-2200 hPa) with
a service flow of 50-80 ml/min.) | 1 to 2.2 bar (1000-2200 hPa) with a
service flow of 50-80 ml/min.) | Same. |
| Substantial Equivalence Table | | | | |
| Item for Comparison | Proposed Device
(PERIO-FLOW Nozzle DT-476) | Predicate Device
(PERIO-FLOW Nozzle DT-113) | Explanation of
Variation | |
| Service pressure to
the turbine
connection: Air | Static pressure 2.7 to 3.5 bar
(2700-3500 hPa) | Static pressure 2.7 to 3.5 bar (2700-
3500 hPa) | Same. | |
| Nozzle Geometry | 20.3mm in length, the width of
the device at the taper is 2.96
mm thick where the taper begins
near the shoulder and 2.03mm
thick near the tip | 20.3mm in length, the width of the
device at the taper is 2.96 mm thick
where the taper begins near the
shoulder and 2.03mm thick near the
tip | Same. | |
6
VIII. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
Biocompatibility testing:
The biocompatibility evaluation for the PERIO-FLOW nozzle was conducted in accordance with the FDA guidance Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" (Attachment A) published June 16, 2016. This device is categorized in ISO 10993-1:2009 as "Surface device breached or compromised surface" per section 5.2.1(c). The device will have limited contact of less than or equal to 24 hours. Testing completed on this device includes:
- . Cytotoxicity
- . Sensitization
- . Irritation
Comparison Testing:
To verify that the nozzles will work with the specified dental handpieces, comparison testing was completed on the current material (predicate) and the new material (this submission) for the nozzle. Comparison testing consisted of measuring connection force, pressure resistance, and nozzle fixation.
To verify that the change of material does not impact the performance on the nozzle, functional testing was completed on the current material (predicate) and the new material (this submission) for the nozzle. Functional testing consisted of confirming the placement of powder exit holes on the nozzle, the direction of powder exits, and the durability of the markings.
All tests were successfully performed and all acceptance criteria were met.
IX. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the information and supporting documentation provided in the premarket notification, the PERIO-FLOW nozzle is substantially equivalent to the cited predicate device. Testing demonstrates that the PERIO-FLOW nozzle fulfills prospectively defined design and performance specifications.