K Number
K163215
Device Name
AnemoCheck
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2017-09-13

(301 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
864.7500
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The AnemoCheck is an in vitro diagnostic semi-quantitative assay for use in point-of-care, clinical and doctor office laboratories for the determination of hemoglobin level and estimation of hematocrit percentage (within normal hemoglobin range) in anticoagulated (K2EDTA, heparin or citrate) whole blood (capillary or venous). AnemoCheck should not be used to evaluate neonatal samples (birth - 1 month).

Device Description

The AnemoCheck™ is a semi-quantitative colorimetric assay for determination of total hemoglobin (g/dL) and calculated hematocrit (%) in whole blood. Capillary or venous blood may be used. The assay is rapid (development time is 2 minutes) and is a manual test that does not require electrical power or additional equipment.

AI/ML Overview

The Sanguina AnemoCheck device is a semi-quantitative colorimetric assay for determining total hemoglobin (g/dL) and calculated hematocrit (%) in whole blood.

Here's an analysis of its acceptance criteria and supporting study information:

1. Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The provided document does not explicitly state quantitative acceptance criteria in a table format. However, it indicates "substantial equivalence based on accuracy and precision" relative to the predicate device. For a semi-quantitative device measuring hemoglobin, typical acceptance criteria would involve a certain level of agreement or correlation with a reference method, often expressed as a percentage of agreement within a clinically acceptable range or a specific mean difference and standard deviation.

The document states:

  • "Bench testing of AnemoCheck versus the predicate device demonstrate substantial equivalence based on accuracy and precision."
  • "Test results are comparable to other test methods in clinical laboratory and point-of-care practices."

Without specific numerical targets for accuracy (e.g., within X% of a reference method) or precision (e.g., coefficient of variation below Y%), the exact "acceptance criteria" are not fully detailed. The conclusion of "substantial equivalence" implies that the performance met the FDA's criteria for a device of this type, likely benchmarked against predicate devices like the Hemocue® Hemoglobin Hb 201+ Analyzing System and Siemens® Advia 2120i.

2. Sample Size and Data Provenance for the Test Set

  • Sample Size: The document does not explicitly state the sample size used for the test set in the "Summary of Non-clinical Testing" or "Assessment of Performance" sections.
  • Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin of the data or whether the study was retrospective or prospective.

3. Number of Experts and their Qualifications for Ground Truth

  • The document does not provide information on the number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set or their qualifications. Given that it's an in vitro diagnostic device for hemoglobin measurement, the "ground truth" would typically be established by a laboratory reference method (e.g., a hematology analyzer) rather than expert consensus, though interpretation of results might involve medical professionals.

4. Adjudication Method

  • The document does not describe any adjudication method. This is expected given that the ground truth for an IVD device like this would likely be an objective measurement from a reference instrument, not subjective assessment requiring adjudication.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

  • No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not mentioned or performed. This type of study is typically relevant for interpretative devices where human readers assess medical images or data. The AnemoCheck is a direct measurement device, not an interpretative one in the context of MRMC studies.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study

  • Yes, a standalone study was performed. The "Summary of Non-clinical Testing" states: "Bench testing of AnemoCheck versus the predicate device demonstrate substantial equivalence based on accuracy and precision." This implies the device's performance was evaluated inherently, as a semi-quantitative colorimetric assay, without human interpretation as part of the core measurement. The output of the device (color change) is interpreted manually to determine the hemoglobin level, making it a "manual test that does not require electrical power or additional equipment."

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

  • The type of ground truth used would be objective laboratory measurements from predicate or reference devices. The text states: "Bench testing of AnemoCheck versus the predicate device..." and "Test results are comparable to other test methods in clinical laboratory and point-of-care practices." This strongly indicates the AnemoCheck's measurements were compared against established, quantitative hemoglobin assays (like the Hemocue Hb 201+ or Siemens Advia 2120i) which serve as the ground truth.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

  • The document does not explicitly state the sample size used for any training set. As a manual, semi-quantitative colorimetric assay, the development process might involve calibration and optimization rather than a "training set" in the machine learning sense. The information provided focuses on the validation of the final device.

9. How Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

  • The document does not provide information on how ground truth was established for any training set. If a training phase existed (e.g., for optimizing the color scale), it would logically also rely on objective laboratory measurements from reference methods for hemoglobin.

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other, with flowing lines suggesting movement or connection.

Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002

September 13, 2017

Sanguina, LLC % Cathryn Cambria Consultant Cambria Regulatory Consulting, Inc. 5536 Trowbridge Drive Dunwoody, Georgia 30338

Re: K163215

Trade/Device Name: AnemoCheck Regulation Number: 21 CFR 864.7500 Regulation Name: Whole blood hemoglobin assays Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KHG Dated: July 13, 2017 Received: July 14, 2017

Dear Cathryn Cambria:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply

{1}------------------------------------------------

with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.

You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.

Sincerely.

Leonthena R. Carrington -S

Lea Carrington Director Division of Immunology and Hematology Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known) K163215

Device Name AnemoCheck

Indications for Use (Describe)

The AnemoCheck is an in vitro diagnostic semi-quantitative assay for use in point-of-care, clinical and doctor office laboratories for the determination of hemoglobin level and estimation of hematocrit percentage (within normal hemoglobin range) in anticoagulated (K2EDTA, heparin or citrate) whole blood (capillary or venous). AnemoCheck should not be used to evaluate neonatal samples (birth - 1 month).

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

{3}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Sanguina. The logo features a red blood drop and a red curved line on top of a white circle. Below the circle, the word "sanguina" is written in red lowercase letters.

K163215

510(k) Summary

This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR Part 807.92.

Date : September 7, 2017

1. Submitter:

Sanguina, LLC 575 14th Street, NW Atlanta, GA 30318

2. Contact Name:

Cathryn N. Cambria 404-543-5909 ccambria@mindspring.com

3. Device:

Proprietary Name - AnemoCheck™ Common Name – Whole Blood Hemoglobin Determination

4. Classifications Names & Citations:

Product Code: KHG Regulation Number: 864.7500 Device Class: 2

న. Predicate Device:

Hemocue® Hemoglobin Hb 201+ Analyzing System K032203 Siemens® Advia 2120i (K042251)

{4}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Sanguina. The logo features a stylized red blood drop shape above the word "sanguina" in a lowercase, sans-serif font. The blood drop is a curved shape, and the logo is set against a white background.

Device Description: 6.

The AnemoCheck™ is a semi-quantitative colorimetric assay for determination of total hemoglobin (g/dL) and calculated hematocrit (%) in whole blood. Capillary or venous blood may be used. The assay is rapid (development time is 2 minutes) and is a manual test that does not require electrical power or additional equipment.

7. Indication for use:

The AnemoCheck is an in vitro diagnostic semi-quantitative assay for use in pointof-care, clinical and doctor office laboratories for the determination of hemoglobin level and estimation of hematocrit percentage (within normal hemoglobin range) in anticoagulated (K2EDTA, heparin or citrate) whole blood (capillary or venous). AnemoCheck should not be used to evaluate neonatal samples (birth - 1 month).

8. Summary of Non-clinical Testing:

Bench testing of AnemoCheck versus the predicate device demonstrate substantial equivalence based on accuracy and precision. Interference studies were conducted. Results indicated no significant effects on AnemoCheck test performance.

9. Assessment of Performance:

The AnemoCheck is a convenient method for measuring total hemoglobin and calculated hematocrit (%) in whole blood. Test results are comparable to other test methods in clinical laboratory and point-of-care practices.

10. Conclusions:

The AnemoCheck™ is similar to other commercially available products based on the intended use, technology, and performance characteristics. In accordance with the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 CFR Part 807, and based on the information provided in this premarket notification Sanguina, LLC concludes that AnemoCheck is safe and effective and substantially equivalent to the predicate(s).

§ 864.7500 Whole blood hemoglobin assays.

(a)
Identification. A whole blood hemoglobin assay is a device consisting or reagents, calibrators, controls, or photometric or spectrophotometric instrumentation used to measure the hemoglobin content of whole blood for the detection of anemia. This generic device category does not include automated hemoglobin systems.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). An acid hematin intended for use with whole blood hemoglobin assays is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 864.9.