The IBL International Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassay is intended for the in-vitro diagnostic quantitative determination of Cortisol in human saliva and for use as an aid in the diagnosis and treatment of adrenal disorders. The device is not intended for point-of-care settings.

Device Description

Cortisol (also known as hydrocortisone, compound F) is the main glucocorticoid in humans and is produced in the zona fasciculata of the adrenal cortex. 90 % of the circulating cortisol are bound to corticoid binding globulin (CBG, Transcortin), ca. 7 % are bound to albumin and only 1-3 % are unbound. Only the latter part represents the active form of cortisol. The free cortisol is released in saliva and is excreted via the kidneys as a small part among the metabolites of cortisol. The level of free cortisol in blood regulates mainly its secretion in the adrenal cortex in a negative feedback mechanism via CRH (corticotropin releasing hormone) in the hypothalamic region and the ACTH in the pituitary gland, but it is also affected by different situations above all by stress.

In humans, there is a physiological fluctuation of cortisol achieving the highest level in the morning and the lowest during the night. This fluctuation of cortisol plasma level is reflected in saliva normally with a peak in the first 90 minutes after waking up. The cortisol measurement is indicated in adrenal disorders. Due to the diurnal fluctuations of cortisol, a salivary sample collection is an easy method without the stress of repeated venipunctures.

Test principle:
Luminescence immunoassay based on the competition principle. An unknown amount of antigen present in the sample and a fixed amount of enzyme labelled antigen compete for the binding sites of the antibodies coated onto the wells. After incubation the wells are washed to stop the competition reaction. After addition of the luminescence substrate solution the intensity of the luminescence measured is inversely proportional to the amount of the antigen in the sample. Results of samples can be determined directly using the standard curve.

Device composition:
The device is available in two sizes, 96 tests and 960 tests.

The device consists of an antibody coated 96 well Microtiter Plate, seven Standards (range 0.015 - 3.20 µg/dL, equivalent to 0.15 - 32 ng/mL calibrated to the NIST cortisol), two Controls, Enzyme Conjugate (Cortisol coupled to peroxidase), Chemiluminescence Reagent 1 and 2, 10x concentrated Wash Buffer, Adhesive Foils.

AI/ML Overview

The provided document describes the IBL International Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassay, a device for in-vitro diagnostic quantitative determination of Cortisol in human saliva, intended as an aid in diagnosing and treating adrenal disorders. The device's performance was evaluated through various analytical studies and a method comparison with a predicate device.

Here's a breakdown of the requested information:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document does not explicitly present a table of "acceptance criteria" separate from the "reported device performance." Instead, it describes various performance characteristics and their outcomes, implying that the achieved outcomes met the internal acceptance criteria for substantial equivalence. I will synthesize the reported performance characteristics that implicitly serve as acceptance criteria.

Performance Characteristic	Acceptance Criteria (Implied)	Reported Device Performance
Detection Limits	Sufficiently low	LoB: 0.004 µg/dL
		LoD/LoQ study performed.
Specificity (Cross-reactivity)	Interfering substances at high concentrations should not significantly impact results.	Prednisolone: ≥10% cross-reactivity at 10,000 µg/dL. 11-Deoxycortisol: ≥5% cross-reactivity at 10,000 µg/dL.
Linearity	Strong linear correlation.	Determined Cortisol concentration (µg/dL) = -0.05 + 1.03 x (expected Cortisol concentration (ug/dL)), with R² = 0.99. Linear range: 0.012 µg/dL (LoQ) to 3.134 µg/dL.
Recovery	Acceptable range of recovery.	93.7% – 109.6% for tested samples with expected concentrations 0.242 µg/dL to 2.528 µg/dL.
Precision	Low variability (CV).	Between-lot CV range: 0.4 – 1.7%. Between-operator CV range: 0.8 – 1.8%.
Sample Freezing Claim (CV)	CV after freezing should be lower than without freezing.	Mean CV = 4.4% after freezing vs. 7.2% without freezing.
Sample Stability	Cortisol concentration within predetermined acceptance range across tested conditions.	Storage Conditions & Stability:- 37°C: 1 week- 18-25°C: 2 weeks- 2-8°C: 2 weeks- < -15°C: 6 months
Microtiterplate Humidity	No loss in functionality.	Full functionality maintained after exposure to various humidity and temperature conditions (worst-case scenario tested).
Real-time Stability	Assay stable for a specified duration.	Full functionality for at least 34 months at 2°C-8°C. Claimed shelf life: 18 months.
Traceability	Traceable to a recognized standard.	Traceable to NIST Cortisol reference material (Ref. 921). Linear regression: y = 0.9852x + 0.006, R² = 0.999. Mean uncertainty of 2%.
Method Comparison (Correlation with Predicate)	Strong correlation with predicate device.	Correlation (R) = 0.993 with Pantex Salivary Cortisol EIA. Weighted Deming regression: y = -0.017 + 0.902x. Demonstrated accuracy up to 3.0 µg/dL.
Reportable Range	Consistent with observed linear range and clinical utility.	0.012 - 3.0 µg/dL (stated in IFU).

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

Detection Limits (LoB, LoD/LoQ): Five different samples, tested five times in duplicate during three days.
Specificity (Cross-reactivity): Three different human saliva samples, spiked with interfering substances in six different concentrations. Tested once in duplicate during eight days.
Linearity: Two different human saliva samples, mixed to produce intermediate concentrations. Tested in duplicate during two days.
Recovery: Three different human saliva samples, spiked with six different cortisol concentrations. Tested in duplicate during one day.
Precision: Seven human saliva pools, determined in triplicate, over 20 days of testing.
Analytical Specificity (Interferences): Three different human saliva samples, tested in duplicate during one day.
Sample Freezing Claim: Not explicitly stated how many samples were used, but described conceptually with "mean CV" figures.
Sample Stability: Five samples (low, medium, high concentration).
Reference Interval Study: 325 prospectively collected samples from apparently healthy individuals. Origin: one collection site within the United States.
Method Comparison Study: 169 human saliva samples. Data provenance not explicitly stated, but implies laboratory testing with provided samples rather than external clinical trial data.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g., radiologist with 10 years of experience)

For this in-vitro diagnostic device, "ground truth" is established by the analytical reference methods and measured concentrations, not by expert consensus on clinical images or diagnoses.

Traceability: Ground truth for standards is established by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) using their standard reference material (Ref. 921) for cortisol.
Method Comparison: The predicate device, Pantex INC. AM/PM Salivary cortisol EIA (K102841), serves as the comparator or "reference" for evaluating the proposed device's performance. The "ground truth" for these samples is the value obtained from the predicate device.

No medical experts (e.g., radiologists) were involved in establishing the "ground truth" in the traditional sense for this type of analytical device. The "truth" is based on established chemical assay methodologies and traceable standards.

4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

Not applicable for this type of in-vitro diagnostic device. Adjudication methods are typically used in clinical studies involving interpretation of subjective data (e.g., images) by multiple human readers. For this device, performance is based on quantitative analytical measurements.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This is an in-vitro diagnostic device that provides a quantitative measurement of cortisol in saliva. It is not an AI-powered image analysis tool or a device used by human readers for interpretation. Therefore, no MRMC study was conducted, and there's no concept of human readers improving with/without AI assistance.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This refers to the device's inherent analytical performance. The various analytical studies (LoB, LoD, LoQ, linearity, recovery, precision, specificity, stability) effectively represent the "standalone" performance of the immunoassay without human interpretive input affecting the quantitative result. The device itself performs the measurement.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

The ground truth for the analytical performance studies (such as linearity, recovery, and precision) is derived from:

Carefully prepared samples with known concentrations of cortisol (e.g., standards, spiked samples).
Comparisons against a legally marketed predicate device whose performance characteristics are already established and accepted by regulatory bodies.
Traceability to Certified Reference Materials (NIST Cortisol reference material).

For the reference interval study, the "ground truth" is the observed cortisol levels in a cohort of healthy individuals selected based on specific inclusion/exclusion criteria.

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable in the context of machine learning or AI models with distinct training sets. This is a traditional immunoassay kit. The "training" for the assay itself involves internal method development and optimization, which would use many samples, but these are not formally designated as a "training set" like in AI/ML.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable as it's not an AI/ML model needing a separate training set with ground truth. The development and validation of the immunoassay rely on standard laboratory practices, including using calibrated reference materials and internal quality controls.

Summary

{0}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The logo consists of a circular border with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized graphic of three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other, with flowing lines extending from the bottom profile.

Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002

November 25, 2015

IBL INTERNATIONAL GMBH NICOLA KAISER HEAD OF REGULATORY/ QM FLUGHAFENSTRASSE 52 A HAMBURG D-22335 GERMANY

Re: K150528

Trade/Device Name: Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassav Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1205 Regulation Name: Cortisol (Hydrocortisone and Hydroxycorticosterone) Test System Regulatory Class: II Product Code: NHG Dated: October 21, 2015 Received: October 22, 2015

Dear Nicola Kaiser:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21. Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

{1}------------------------------------------------

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulations (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638 2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.

You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.

Sincerely yours.

Katherine Serrano -S

For : Courtney H. Lias, Ph.D. Director Division of Chemistry and Toxicology Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{2}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known) K150528

Device Name

Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassay

Indications for Use (Describe)

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)	Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

{3}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image contains a logo for IBL International. The logo features the letters "IBL" in a bold, dark blue font, with the word "INTERNATIONAL" written in a smaller font size below. To the left of the letters is a circular graphic with a cube-like design inside. On the left side of the image, the text "a Tecan Group company" is written vertically in a smaller, orange font.

IBL International GmbH, Flughafenstrasse 52a, 22335 Hamburg

510(k) Summary K150528

For

Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassay

1. Submission Correspondence

IBL International GmbH Flughafenstrasse 52A D-22335 Hamburg GERMANY Phone: + 49 40 532891 482 Fax: + 49 40 532891 11 Contact: Nicola Kaiser, Quality Manager/Regulatory Affairs

2. Submission Sponsor

IBL International GmbH Flughafenstrasse 52A D-22335 Hamburg GERMANY Phone: + 49 40 532891 482 Fax: + 49 40 532891 11 Contact: Geert Nygaard, Managing Director

3. Date Prepared

2015-11-24

IBL International GmbH

49 (0) 40 53 28 91-1

Geert W. Nygaar ht Hambur Account: 577 073 000 200 700 00 1 2007 0000 0577 0730 00 Umsatzsteuer ID: DE2610.

IBL International GmbH

047 510k Summary Revision D

{4}------------------------------------------------

4. Device Name

Trade/Proprietary Name: Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassay Common/Usual Name: Cortisol Saliva LUM

5. Classification Name

Classification Name: Enzyme Immunoassay, Cortisol, Saliyary: Cortisol (hydrocortisone and hydroxycorticosterone) test system Classification Regulation: 862.1205 Product Code: NHG

6. Predicate Device

Pantex INC. AM/PM Salivary cortisol EIA K102841.

7. Device Description

Summary and explanation:

Test principle:

Luminescence immunoassay based on the competition principle. An unknown amount of antigen present in the sample and a fixed amount of enzyme labelled antigen compete for the binding sites of the antibodies coated onto the wells. After incubation the wells are washed to stop the competition reaction. After addition of the luminescence substrate solution the intensity of the luminescence measured is inversely proportional to the amount of the antigen in the sample. Results of samples can be determined directly using the standard curve.

{5}------------------------------------------------

Device composition:

The device is available in two sizes, 96 tests and 960 tests.

8. Intended Use

The IBL International Cortisol Luminescence Immunoassay is intended for the in-vitro diagnostic quantitative determination of Cortisol in human saliva and for use as an aid in the diagnosis and treatment of adrenal disorders.

The device is not intended for point-of-care settings.

Item	Cortisol Saliva LuminescenceImmunoassay	Enzyme Immunoassay, CortisolSalivary
510(k) Number	K150528	K102841
Device name	Cortisol Saliva LuminescenceImmunoassay	Enzyme Immunoassay, CortisolSalivary
Analyte	Cortisol	Cortisol
Specimens	Saliva	Saliva
Method	Luminescence Immunoassay	Enzyme Immunoassay
Test principle	Luminescence immunoassaybased on the competition principle.An unknown amount of analytepresent in the sample and a fixedamount of enzyme labelled analytecompetes for the binding sites ofthe antibodies coated onto thewells. After incubation the wellsare washed to stop the competitionreaction. After addition of theluminescence substrate solutionthe intensity of the luminescencemeasured is inversely proportionalto the amount of the analyte in thesample. Results of samples can bedetermined directly using thestandard curve.	The basis of the Cortisol EnzymeImmunoassay (EIA) is thequantitative relation between ligandconcentration and the proportion ofCortisol (analog) enzyme conjugatebound to the antiserum. Forexample: Cortisol in the calibratorsand unknowns compete withCortisol coupled to peroxidase forantibody binding sites. Afterincubation, unbound componentsare washed away. The reactionbetween Cortisol peroxidase withthe substrate (TMB) produces ablue color. The pre-determined timeof incubation the reaction isstopped and a yellow color isformed. The optical density (read at450 nm) is inversely proportional tothe cortisol of calibrators, salivasamples and saliva controls.
Detection	RLU Measurement: luminescence	OD Measurement: OD microplate

Technology Comparison

{6}------------------------------------------------

Item	Cortisol Saliva LuminescenceImmunoassay	Enzyme Immunoassay, CortisolSalivary
	microplate reader	reader
Calculation	Quantitative	Quantitative
Quality control	Control low and high	Control low and high
Reportable range	0.012 µg/dL – 3.0 µg/dL	0.01 µg/dL – 3.0 µg/dL
Indications foruse	The IBL International CortisolSalivaLuminescenceImmunoassay is intended for thein-vitro diagnostic quantitativedetermination of Cortisol in humansaliva and for use as an aid in thediagnosis and treatment of adrenaldisorders.The device is not intended forpoint-of-care settings.	For the in-vitro diagnosticquantitative determination of freeand protein bound salivary cortisolin human saliva as an aid in theassessment of Cushing Syndromeand Addison's Disease.Measurements of cortisol in salivaare used on the diagnosis andtreatment of disorders of adrenalgland.
Performance Characteristics
Expected values(Normal range)	Ages: 21-70AM: 0.079 - 1.290 µg/dL (N=157)PM: 0.042 - 0.436 µg/dL (N=168)	Ages 23-68AM: 0.258 - 1.269 µg/dL (N=152)PM: 0.025 - 0.296 µg/dL (N=152)
Limit of Detection	Limit of Blank: 0.004 µg/dL	Limit of Blank: 0.00392 µg/dL.

Analytical Performance

Detection limits

The LoB study was conducted during three days of testing by one operator. The runs were performed with high and low kit controls and with five different samples. Each sample was tested five times in duplicate each run using two reagent lots.

The LoD/LoQ study was conducted during three days of testing by one operator. The runs were performed with high and low kit controls and with five different human saliva samples. Each sample was tested times in duplicate each run using two reagent lots.

Specificity

The cross reactivity study was conducted during eight days of testing by one operator. A maximum of five runs were performed per day with high and low kit controls and with three different human saliva samples spiked with potential interfering substance in six different concentrations(0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, 1000 and 10000 µg/dL). Each sample was tested once in duplicate using one reagent lot.

Specificity of the IBL Cortisol Saliva LUM Assay test was assessed by testing a panel of 27 members. The cross-reactivity has been defined as:

{7}------------------------------------------------

concentration of cortisol at 50%(B/Bo)

Cross-reactivity =

concentration of cross reactant giving 50% (B/Bo)

The use of topical creams or medication containing prednisolone and 11-Deoxycortisol should be avoided as they can cause preanalytical contamination of the saliva sample.

At ≥10% Prednisolone is a potential interfering substance (from 10000 µg/dL). At ≥5% 11-Deoxycortisol is a potential interfering substance (from 10000 ug/dL).

Linearity

The linearity experiment was conducted according to the CLSI EP06-A during two days of testing by one operator. The runs were performed with high and low kit controls and with two different human saliva samples mixed up with each other to produce intermediate concentrations. Each sample was tested in duplicate using one reagent lot.

A linear correlation between the expected concentration and the determined concentration could be detected which showed the following best fit:

Determined Cortisol concentration (µg/dL) = -0.05 + 1.03 x (expected Cortisol concentration (ug/dL)), with R2 =0.99.

The linear range of the assay is defined by the LoQ =0.012 µg/dL and the highest tested Cortisol concentration of 3.134 µg/dL that showed an absence of a non-linear component.

Recoverv

The Recovery study was conducted during one day of testing by one operator. The run was performed with high and low kit controls and with three different human saliva samples spiked with six different cortisol concentrations. Each sample was tested in duplicate using one reagent lot.

The recovery showed a minimum of 93.7% and a maximum of 109.6% for all tested samples and expected concentrations. The expected concentrations ranged from 0.242 µg/dL to 2.528 µg/dL,

Precision

The Study was conducted during 1 day of pre-evaluation and familiarization period and 20 days of testing (based on CLSI Guideline EP05-A3). 6 assays were performed daily within a fully factorial design using 3 different reagent lots and 3 operators. Within each assay 7 human saliva pools were used and determined in triplicate

The between lot variation showed a CV range of 0.4 – 1.7% for the seven different concentrated human saliva samples.

{8}------------------------------------------------

The between operator variation showed a CV range of 0.8 – 1.8% for the seven different concentrated human saliva samples.

Interferences

Analytical Specificity

The analytical specificity study was conducted for every possible potentially substance during one day of testing by one operator. The runs were performed with high and low kit controls and with 3 different human saliva samples. Each sample was tested in duplicate using one reagent lot.

Sample Freezing Claim

The removal of the highly viscous components improves the pipetting precision. Freezing is believed to lead to the denaturation of the protein components of the viscous components. These denatured protein components were thereafter removed by centrifugation of the sample.

The mean of the coefficient of variation for freezing was lower than the mean of the coefficient of variation for samples that have not been frozen once (Mean CV = 4.4% after freezing vs. 7.2% without freezing process).

In addition the stability of Cortisol in samples was evaluated. Five samples for which the Cortisol concentration is known (low, medium and high concentration) and an acceptance range had been established were stored at the following conditions:

1. ≤ -20°C for 3, 6 and 12 months
1. 2-8°C for 1, 2 and 4 weeks
1. 19-26°C (RT = room temperature) for 1, 2 and 4 weeks
1. 36-39°C for 4 days, 1 week and 2 weeks
1. 50°C for 1 day, 4 days and 1 week.

Within all samples stored at the above conditions, the concentration of Cortisol was determined within the predetermined acceptance range. The sample stability is listed in the following table:

Storage	37°C	18-25°C	2-8°C	< -15°C
Stability	1 week	2 weeks	2 weeks	6 months

{9}------------------------------------------------

Microtiterplate Humidity

The effect of humidity and temperature on the coated wells was evaluated by storing the microtiter strips at three different grades of humidity (dry, ambient and wet saturated) and three different temperatures (2-8°C, 19-26°C and 35-39°C) for 7 davs. 14 days and 4 weeks. No loss in functionality of the IBL Cortisol Saliva LUM was observed following the different treatments and these treatments did contain the worst case scenario that the IBL Cortisol Saliva LUM might be subjected to.

Real-time Stabilitv

The assay shows full functionality and is stable for at least 34 months at 2°C-8°C. The kit stability includes a safety margin anticipating the use of the kit beyond the stated expiration date by the customer. This safety margin has been set to 6 months. Even if the 34 months stability results demonstrate full functionality of the IBL Cortisol Saliva LUM, the stability claim on the kit however only states a maximal shelf life of 18 months in order to increase safety and effectiveness of the device.

Traceability

The cortisol results obtained with the IBL Cortisol Saliva LUM are metrological traceable to the SI-Unit ug/dL by the cortisol concentration of the standard reference material (Ref. 921) provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

The assigned standard concentrations were confirmed by comparison to NIST Cortisol reference material with following linear regression analysis: v = 0.9852x + 0.006, R2 = 0.999 and with a mean uncertainty of 2 %.

Reference Interval Study

Reference intervals were established using prospectively 325 collected samples from apparently healthy 76 males and 76 females at two independent time points at one collection site located within the United States.

Saliva was collected using the Cortisol Salivette from SARSTEDT Int. (FDA listing number: D053653). The inclusion criteria for the healthy adult population was adults between 21-70 years of age, genders and race with normal TSH and TPO levels, were not currently undergoing medical treatment or drug therapy, and were free of illness on the day of sample collection.

The exclusion criteria included patients on cortisol therapy, on hormone therapy or taking oral contraceptives, patients with implanted contraceptive

{10}------------------------------------------------

devices, history of thyroid or other autoimmune disease, history of Cushing's syndrome or Addison's disease, pregnant or lactating women.

The reference interval study was conducted during five days of testing by two different operators. A maximum of three runs were performed per day with high and low kit controls and with the different human saliva samples. Each sample was tested once in duplicate using one reagent lot.

Clinical Testing

The design, development and testing of the Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassay device has not resulted in the need for any clinical trials.

The laboratory clinical testing that was performed is listed above. These were performed in the laboratory with no human clinical trials being performed.

Non-Clinical Testing

The laboratory testing for clinical evaluation was performed using IBL International's Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassay (Cortisol Saliva LUM) versus Pantex INC. AM/PM Salivary cortisol EIA (K102841) predicate device. Laboratory data were presented to evaluate clinical accuracy of results. The performance characteristics of the Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassay were verified by several studies as LOB-LOD-LOQ, specificity, linearity, recovery, stability, precision, patient preparation claim, sample freezing claim, MTP humidity, analytical specificity, method comparison and reference interval. Testing results indicate that the Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassay perform satisfactorily when used appropriately, as outlined in the package insert.

Method Comparison Study

The Method comparison study was conducted during five days of testing by one operator. The runs were performed with high and low kit controls and with the different human saliya samples. Each sample was tested in duplicate using one reagent lot.

A comparison of the IBL Cortisol Saliva LUM and the predicate device was completed. The results of weighted deming regressionof Cortisol concentrations measured with the IBL LUM (y) and with the comparison methods (x) in human saliva samples are summarized in the following table.

Pantex AM/PM Salivary Cortisol Enzyme Immunoassay (K102841) (abbreviated: Pantex Salivary Cortisol EIA). This comparator assay is cleared up to 3.0 ua/dL.

The results of the method comparison are described by the weighted deming regression:

{11}------------------------------------------------

Y – TestUnit	X – Comparison Unit	N	R	y = a +bx
IBL	Pantex SalivaryCortisol EIA	169	0.993	y = -0.017 + 0.902x

Weighted deming regression for the Cortisol Saliva LUM versus the predicate device show very strong correlation. Therefore the IBL Cortisol Saliva LUM is demonstrated to be accurate up to 3.0 µg/dL, and is assumed to be substantially equivalent to the additional comparator of the 510k cleared device of Pantex Salivary Cortisol EIA.

Reportable range in the instructions for Use is stated as 0.012 - 3.0 µg/dL.

Conclusion

Laboratory study results indicate that the intended users were able to obtain comparable testing data when using the Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassay and the legally marketed predicate devices.

The testing results supports that all the product specifications have met the acceptance criteria as completed during the laboratory testing. The device hazard analysis was completed and risk control implemented to mitigate identified hazards. The Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassay device passed all testing and supports the claims of substantial equivalence to the predicate device.

The Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassay device has the same intended use and technological characteristics as the predicate devices.

Regulation Number and Section

§ 862.1205 Cortisol (hydrocortisone and hydroxycorticosterone) test system.

(a)
Identification. A cortisol (hydrocortisone and hydroxycorticosterone) test system is a device intended to measure the cortisol hormones secreted by the adrenal gland in plasma and urine. Measurements of cortisol are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders of the adrenal gland.(b)
Classification. Class II.

Katherine Serrano -S

Indications for Use

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.

*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW *

510(k) Summary K150528

For

Cortisol Saliva Luminescence Immunoassay

1. Submission Correspondence

2. Submission Sponsor

3. Date Prepared

4. Device Name

5. Classification Name

6. Predicate Device

7. Device Description

Summary and explanation:

Test principle:

Device composition:

8. Intended Use

Technology Comparison

Analytical Performance

Detection limits

Specificity

Linearity

Recoverv

Precision

Interferences

Analytical Specificity

Sample Freezing Claim

Microtiterplate Humidity

Real-time Stabilitv

Traceability

Reference Interval Study

Clinical Testing

Non-Clinical Testing

Method Comparison Study

Conclusion

§ 862.1205 Cortisol (hydrocortisone and hydroxycorticosterone) test system.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW