K Number
K103252
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2011-01-10

(68 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
872.3630
Panel
DE
Reference & Predicate Devices
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

CAMLOG® Vario SR components for crown and bridge restorations:

  • Occlusal screw-retained crown, bridge and bar constructions on CAMLOG® implants (with J and K article numbers) in the anterior and posterior region of the maxilla and mandible
    CAMLOG® Vario SR components for bar restorations:
  • Anchorage of implant-supported full dentures for the edentulous maxilla and mandible in combination with 2, 4 or more CAMLOG® implants (with J and K article numbers)
Device Description

CAMLOG® Vario SR Abutments are titanium dental implant abutments for use with the CAMLOG® Dental Implant System. They have an internal connection to the implant, a conical interface with the prosthetic attachment, and are used for single and multi-unit screw-retained, prefabricated restorations. They are appropriate for supporting laboratory cast frameworks as well as laser-welded bar constructions and have dedicated prosthetic components.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text describes the 510(k) summary for Altatec GmbH CAMLOG® Vario SR Abutments. This is a medical device submission, and the information requested pertains to the evaluation of AI/ML-driven medical devices. Unfortunately, the provided document does not contain any information about an AI/ML-driven device or its performance evaluation.

Instead, the document details a traditional medical device (dental implant abutments) and its substantial equivalence to other legally marketed predicate devices. The "testing" mentioned refers to mechanical testing according to ISO 14801 for static and dynamic fatigue properties of the physical device.

Therefore, I cannot provide a table of acceptance criteria, reported device performance, or details about studies involving sample sizes, ground truth establishment, expert adjudication, or MRMC studies, as these concepts are not applicable to the content provided.

I can, however, extract the relevant "testing" information for this specific device from the provided text, which focuses on mechanical performance:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (for mechanical properties of the physical device):

Acceptance Criteria CategorySpecific Criteria/StandardReported Device PerformanceStudy Details
Mechanical StrengthISO 14801 Dentistry - Implants - Dynamic fatigue test for endosseous dental implants"Results of fatigue testing confirmed the strength of the system."Mechanical testing was performed. No specific numerical results or sample sizes for this testing are provided in the summary.

Regarding the other requested information (AI/ML specific details):

  1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable as the device is not AI/ML-driven.
  2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable.
  3. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable.
  4. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable.
  5. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable.
  6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): Not applicable. The "ground truth" for this device would be its physical strength and material properties.
  7. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
  8. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

§ 872.3630 Endosseous dental implant abutment.

(a)
Identification. An endosseous dental implant abutment is a premanufactured prosthetic component directly connected to the endosseous dental implant and is intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)