(226 days)
ANTHOGYR's IMPLANTEO implantology and dental surgery motor unit are indicated to perform dental implant surgery, such as perforating the bone and tapping and threading procedures required before placement of implant prosthetics.
ANTHOGYR has developed "IMPLANTEO" implantology and dental surgery motor unit intended to perform dental implant surgery which is substantially equivalent to legally marketed and FDA cleared predicate devices. The ANTHOGYR "IMPLANTEO" implantology and dental surgery motor unit consist of design improvement of non essential characteristics of the device. The ANTHOGYR "IMPLANTEO" implantology and dental surgery motor unit has the same fundamental scientific technology, operating principle and intended use as ANTHOGYR IMPLANTEO (K041279) with ANTHOGYR implantology contra-angle (K090676) or BIEN-AIR CHIROPRO L (K092214) with NSK contra-angle (K970953) or W&H implantMED (K052741) with contra-angle (K080939).
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the "IMPLANTEO" Implantology and Dental surgery motor unit, based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
For this device, the "acceptance criteria" are primarily established by conformity to recognized industry standards for dental handpieces and medical electrical equipment. The "reported device performance" is essentially that the device conforms to these standards and is substantially equivalent to predicate devices. The document does not provide specific quantitative performance metrics like accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity, as it's a hardware device designed for mechanical tasks.
| Acceptance Criteria (Standards Conformance) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Medical Devices Labeling & Information | Anthogyr Contra angles & Handpieces conform to: |
| ISO 15223-1 (2007) "Medical devices – Symbols to be used with medical device labels, labeling and information to be supplied" | ✓ Conforms |
| Dental Handpieces - Electrical & Mechanical | |
| IEC 11498 (1997) "Dental Handpieces: Dental low-voltage electrical motors" | ✓ Conforms |
| ISO 7785-2 (1998) "Dental Handpieces Part 2: Straight and geared angle handpieces" | ✓ Conforms |
| ISO 3964 (1982) "Dental Handpieces Coupling dimensions" | ✓ Conforms |
| NF EN ISO 1797-1 (1995) "Dental rotatory instruments Shanks Part 1: Shanks made of metal" | ✓ Conforms |
| Medical Electrical Equipment - Safety & EMC | |
| IEC 60601-1 (2005) "Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1: General Requirements for safety" | ✓ Conforms |
| IEC 60601-1-2 (2001) "Medical Electrical Equipment part 1-2: General Requirements for safety - collateral standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility - Requirements and tests" | ✓ Conforms |
| Risk Management & Quality Systems | |
| ISO 14971 (2007) "Medical devices Application of risk management to medical devices" | ✓ Conforms |
| ISO 13485 (1996) "Medical devices Particular requirements for the application of the ISO 9001" | ✓ Conforms |
| Sterilization Information | |
| NF EN ISO 17664 (2004) "Sterilization of medical devices Information to be provided by the manufacturer for the processing of resterilizable medical devices" | ✓ Conforms |
| Substantial Equivalence | The device has the same fundamental scientific technology, operating principle, and intended use as the legally marketed predicate devices: ANTHOGYR IMPLANTEO (K041279), ANTHOGYR contra-angle (K090676), BIEN-AIR CHIROPRO L (K092214), W&H implantMED (K052741). |
Note: This is a 510(k) submission for a Class I mechanical device, so the "study" is primarily focused on demonstrating conformance to established safety and performance standards and substantial equivalence to existing devices, rather than a clinical trial with statistical performance metrics like those for diagnostic AI devices.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
This document does not describe a "test set" or "data provenance" in the way one would for an AI/software device. The performance data presented refers to conformity with technical standards for the physical device and its components. Therefore, there isn't a sample size of patient data or clinical images mentioned. The "test set" would implicitly be the manufactured device units themselves undergoing testing against the listed standards.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications
Not applicable. For a mechanical device being validated against engineering standards, "experts" in a clinical sense (e.g., radiologists) are not used to establish a "ground truth." The ground truth is defined by the requirements outlined in the engineering and safety standards themselves.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. There is no adjudication method described as would be used for subjective data in diagnostic evaluation. Conformity to standards is typically assessed through objective measurements and verification processes.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
No, a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is relevant for evaluating the performance of AI-assisted diagnostic tools where human readers are involved. This submission is for a mechanical dental surgery motor unit.
6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Was Done
Not applicable. This device is a mechanical motor unit, not an algorithm or AI. Its operation inherently requires a human operator.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for this device's validation is defined by:
- Engineering and Safety Standards: The technical specifications and requirements outlined in the explicitly listed ISO, IEC, and NF EN standards (e.g., electrical safety, mechanical dimensions, electromagnetic compatibility).
- Predicate Device Performance: The established safety and effectiveness of the legally marketed predicate devices to which this device claims substantial equivalence.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This device is a mechanical motor unit, not an AI or machine learning model that requires a training set of data.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
510(k) – « IMPLANTEO » Implantology and Dental surgery motor unit lmpulsion K102241
anthogyr
510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
| Submitter | ANTHOGYR (Registration number 8020776) |
|---|---|
| 2237 avenue André Lasquin | |
| 74700 SALLANCHES FRANCE | |
| Phone: 33(0)4 50 58 02 37 Fax: 33(0)4 50 93 78 60Web : www.anthogyr.com | |
| Contacts | Sabine BRAYETTE (QUALITY ENGINEER IN CHARGE OFREGULATORY AFFAIRS)sabine.brayette.prod@anthogyr.com |
| Trade Name | Anthogyr « Implanteo » implantology and dental surgerymotor unit |
| Legally marketedpredicate devices | ANTHOGYR Implanteo (K041279) - ANTHOGYR contra-angle (K090676)BIEN-AIR CHIROPRO L (K092214) -W&H implantMED (K052741) |
| Classification Name | Dental handpieces and accessories |
| Class | I |
| Product Code | EBW |
| CFR section | 872.4200 |
| Intended Use | ✓ IMPLANTEO implantology and dental surgery motorunit are indicated to perform dental implant surgery,such as perforating the bone and tapping andthreading procedures required before placement ofimplant prosthetics. |
2. INTENDED USE
IMPLANTEO implantology and dental surgery motor unit are indicated to perform dental implant surgery, such as perforating the bone and tapping and threading procedures required before placement of implant prosthetics.
{1}------------------------------------------------
510{k) – « IMPLANTEO » Implantology and Dental surgery motor unit lmpulsion K102241
anthoevr
3. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
ANTHOGYR has developed "IMPLANTEO" implantology and dental surgery motor unit intended to perform dental implant surgery which is substantially equivalent to legally marketed and FDA cleared predicate devices.
The ANTHOGYR "IMPLANTEO" implantology and dental surgery motor unit consist of design improvement of non essential characteristics of the device. The ANTHOGYR "IMPLANTEO" implantology and dental surgery motor unit has the same fundamental scientific technology, operating principle and intended use as ANTHOGYR IMPLANTEO (K041279) with ANTHOGYR implantology contra-angle (K090676) or BIEN-AIR CHIROPRO L (K092214) with NSK contra-angle (K970953) or W&H implantMED (K052741) with contra-angle (K080939).
4. PERFORMANCE DATA
ANTHOGYR Contra angles & Handpieces conform to the following FDA recognized Consensus standards:
-
I 50 15223-1 (2007) *Medical devices - Symbols to be used with medical device labels, labeling and information to be supplied" (Recognition number 5-31)
- V IEC 11498 (1997) "Dental Handpieces : Dental low-voltage electrical motors" (Recognition number 4-83)
- ✓ IEC 60601-1 (2005) *Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1 : General Requirements for safety, 1988; Amendment 1, 1991-11, Amendment 2, 1995" (Recognition number 5-4)
- V IEC 60601-1-2 (2001) "Medical Electrical Equipment part 1-2 : General Requirements for safety - collateral standard : Electromagnetic Compatibility -Requirements and tests" (Recognition number 5-34)
- ✔ ISO 7785-2 (1998) "Dental Handpieces Part 2: Straight and geared angle handpieces" (Recognition number 4-76)
- V ISO 3964 (1982) "Dental Handpieces Coupling dimensions" (Recognition List Number: 003 Effective Date: 05/03/1999)
{2}------------------------------------------------
510(k) – « IMPLANTEO » Implantology and Dental surgery motor unit anthogyr Impulsion K102241
In addition, ANTHOGYR « IMPLANTEO » implantology and dental surgery motor unit and ANTHOGYR Contra angles conform to the following standards:
- I ISO 14971 (2007) "Medical devices Application of risk management to medical devices" (Recognition number : 5-40)
- I SO 13485 (1996) "Medical devices Particular requirements for the application of the ISO 9001"
- V NF EN ISO 1797-1 (1995) "Dental rotatory instruments Shanks Par 1: Shanks made of metal"
- V NF EN ISO 17664 (2004) « Sterilization of medical devices Information to be provided by the manufacturer for the processing of resterilizable medical devices »
5. SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
The ANTHOGYR « IMPLANTEO » implantology and dental surgery motor unit have the same fundamental scientific technology, operating principle and intended use as predicate devices.
Summary preparation date: February 1, 2011
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three lines representing its wings and body. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Ms. Brayette Sabine Quality Engineer Anthogyr ASA 2237, Avenue Andre Lasquin Sallanches, France 74700
MAR 2 3 201
Re: K102241
Trade/Device Name: ANTHOGYR "IMPLANTEO" IMPLANTOLOGY AND DENTAL SURGERY MOTOR UNIT Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.4200 Regulation Name: Dental Handpiece and Accessories Regulatory Class: I Product Code: EBW Dated: March 14, 2011 Received: March 18, 2011
Dear Ms. Sabine:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21. Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page -2 Ms. Sabine
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices /ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Nh for
Anthony D. Watson, B.S., M.S., M.B.A. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
510(k) - « IMPLANTEO » Implantology and Dental surgery motor unit Impulsion K102241
anthogyr
Indications for Use
K10224|
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: ANTHOGYR "IMPLANTEO" IMPLANTOLOGY AND DENTAL SURGERY MOTOR UNIT
Indications for Use:
ANTHOGYR's IMPLANTEO implantology and dental surgery motor unit are indicated to perform dental implant surgery, such as perforating the bone and tapping and threading procedures required before placement of implant prosthetics.
Prescription Use _ Over-The-Counter Use × AND/OR (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Concurrence of (CDRH) Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Susen Karr
Page 1 of 1
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Anesthesiology. General Hospital Infection Control, Dental Devices
510(k) Number: K102241
§ 872.4200 Dental handpiece and accessories.
(a)
Identification. A dental handpiece and accessories is an AC-powered, water-powered, air-powered, or belt-driven, hand-held device that may include a foot controller for regulation of speed and direction of rotation or a contra-angle attachment for difficult to reach areas intended to prepare dental cavities for restorations, such as fillings, and for cleaning teeth.(b)
Classification. Class I.