(22 days)
The Philips MX 16-slice CT system can be used as a Head and Whole Body Computed Tomography X-ray System featuring a continuously rotating xray tube and detector array with multislice capability up to 16 slices simultaneously. The acquired x-ray transmission data is reconstructed by computer into cross-sectional images of the body from the same axial plane taken at different angles. The system is suitable for all patients.
The "Philips MX 16 slice" is a Whole Body Computed Tomography X-Ray System featuring a continuously rotating X-ray tube and detectors gantry and multi-slice capability. The acquired x-ray transmission data is reconstructed by computer into crosssectional images of the body taken at different angles and planes. This device also includes signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, components and accessories.
This looks like a 510(k) summary for a CT scanner, a device with specific regulatory pathways that often rely on substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than novel performance studies. As such, the document does not contain detailed acceptance criteria and a study proving those criteria are met in the same way a new medical algorithm might. Instead, it focuses on demonstrating equivalence to an already approved device.
Therefore, many of the requested fields cannot be directly extracted from this document, as the standard regulatory approach for this type of medical device at the time of this 510(k) summary did not require such detailed performance study reporting in the summary itself.
Here's an analysis based on the provided text, highlighting what is and is not present:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
- Not present in this document. This 510(k) summary focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device (Brilliance CT 16-slice, K012009). The "acceptance criteria" for this submission are fundamentally about showing that the new device has "similar technological characteristics and sub-assemblies" and adheres to relevant safety standards (GMP, ISO 13485, IEC 60601-1, 21 CFR, Subchapter J). Specific performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or AUC, as would be expected for an AI algorithm, are not detailed here because that was not the regulatory requirement for this type of device at this time.
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
- Not applicable/Not present. Since a specific performance study with a test set (in the context of an AI algorithm) is not detailed, this information is not provided. The substantial equivalence argument relies on comparing the device's design, intended use, and safety features to a predicate, not on a clinical performance study with patient data in the typical sense.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
- Not applicable/Not present. As no specific performance study on a test set (with ground truth) is described, this information is not available.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
- Not applicable/Not present. No test set adjudication method is described.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
- Not applicable/Not present. This device is a CT scanner, not an AI-assisted interpretation tool. Therefore, an MRMC study comparing human readers with and without AI assistance is not relevant to this submission.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
- Not applicable/Not present. This device is a hardware CT scanner, not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
- Not applicable/Not present. No specific performance study with ground truth data is described for this submission. The "ground truth" for this 510(k) is the established safety and effectiveness of the predicate device and adherence to recognized standards.
8. The sample size for the training set
- Not applicable/Not present. As this is a CT scanner and not an AI algorithm, there is no "training set" in the context of machine learning.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
- Not applicable/Not present. This question is not relevant for the type of device and submission described.
{0}------------------------------------------------
16083498
510(k) Summary Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland) Inc. "Brilliance Volume"
This summary of this 510(k) provides safety and effectiveness information submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
1. Submitter
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. 595 Miner Road Cleveland, OH 44143 (440) 483-3000
Contact:
Michael A. Chilbert, Ph.D., P.E. Telephone: 440 483 3284 FAX: 440 483 4918 Email: Michael.chilbert@philips.com
Date of Summary: September 1, 2008
2. Device Name and Classification
| Device Name: | Philips MX 16 slice |
|---|---|
| Classification Name: | Computed Tomography X-Ray System |
The FDA has classified the Computed Tomography X-Ray System and its accessories as Class II in 21 CFR 892.1750 (Product Code 90 JAK)
3. Predicate Device Information
In the opinion of Philips Medical Systems Inc., the "Philips MX 16 slice" CT scanner is of comparable type and substantially equivalent to the legally marketed devices currently in commercial distribution, namely: the Brilliance CT 16-slice in K012009 (a.k.a. MX8000 IDT CT Scanner).
4. Device Description
The "Philips MX 16 slice" is a Whole Body Computed Tomography X-Ray System featuring a continuously rotating X-ray tube and detectors gantry and multi-slice capability. The acquired x-ray transmission data is reconstructed by computer into crosssectional images of the body taken at different angles and planes. This device also includes signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, components and accessories.
{1}------------------------------------------------
5. Intended Use of the device
The Philips MX 16-slice CT system can be used as a Whole Body Computed Tomography X-ray System featuring a continuously rotating x-ray tube and detector array with multislice capability up to 16 slices simultaneously. The acquired x-ray transmission data is reconstructed by computer into cross-sectional images of the body from the same axial plane taken at different angles. The system is suitable for all patients.
6. Comparison to Predicate Devices
In the opinion of Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc., the "Philips MX 16 slice" CT scanner is of comparable type and substantially equivalent to the legally marketed devices because it has the similar technological characteristics and sub-assemblies as the current commercial distribution of Brilliance CT 16-slice (K012009).
The safety and effectiveness of the "Philips MX 16 slice" is assured by adherence to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) 21 CFR 820 and to International Standards ISO 13485:2003. Potential hazards are identified in a hazard analysis and controlled in the following manner:
Software safety is assured by the company procedures that conform to accepted practices. Quality assurance procedures are adhered to, and meeting the specifications and functional requirements is demonstrated via testing.
Electrical and Mechanical safety is assured by adherence to IEC 60601-1 Standards.
Radiation safety is assured by compliance with 21 CFR, Subchapter J Performance Standards.
Based on the above considerations, it is Philips's opinion that the "Philips MX 16 slice" CT scanner is substantially equivalent in safety and effectiveness to the predicate device: Brilliance CT 16-slice with 510(k) Number K012009.
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol featuring three horizontal lines that curve and overlap, resembling an abstract representation of the human form or flowing water.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
DEC 1 7 2000
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. % Mr. Casey Conry Senior Project Engineer Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. 1285 Walt Whitman Road MELVILLE NY 11747
Re: K083498
Trade/Device Name: Philips MX 16 Slice CT System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750 Regulation Name: Computed tomography x-ray system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: JAK Dated: December 12, 2008 Received: December 15, 2008
Dear Mr. Conry:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at one of the following numbers, based on the regulation number at the top of this letter:
| 21 CFR 876.xxx | (Gastroenterology/Renal/Urology) | 240-276-0115 |
|---|---|---|
| 21 CFR 884.xxx | (Obstetrics/Gynecology) | 240-276-0115 |
| 21 CFR 894.xxx | (Radiology) | 240-276-0120 |
| Other | 240-276-0100 |
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding postmarket surveillance, please contact CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics' (OSB's) Division of Postmarket Surveillance at 240-276-3474. For questions regarding the reporting of device adverse events (Medical Device Reporting (MDR)), please contact the Division of Surveillance Systems at 240-276-3464. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely vours.
loque M. Whang
Joyce M. Whang, Ph.D. Acting Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known):
K083498
Page 1 of 1
Device Name:
Philips MX 16-slice CT system
Indications for Use:
The Philips MX 16-slice CT system can be used as a Head and Whole Body Computed Tomography X-ray System featuring a continuously rotating xray tube and detector array with multislice capability up to 16 slices simultaneously. The acquired x-ray transmission data is reconstructed by computer into cross-sectional images of the body from the same axial plane taken at different angles. The system is suitable for all patients.
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Helent Remer
Division Sign Off
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, and Radiological Devices 510(k) Number
§ 892.1750 Computed tomography x-ray system.
(a)
Identification. A computed tomography x-ray system is a diagnostic x-ray system intended to produce cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from the same axial plane taken at different angles. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.(b)
Classification. Class II.