(57 days)
The AXP Platform MarrowXpress System is intended to be used in the clinical laboratory or intraoperatively at the point of care for preparation of a cell concentrate from bone marrow.
The AXP Platform MarrowXpress System is a semi-automated, closed system that harvests a precise, operator-determined volume of stem cell-rich buffy coat from human bone marrow. The system consists of the following major components 1) disposable Processing Bag Set, 2) rechargeable NiMH battery-powered MXP Device, 3) AC-powered Docking Station, and 4) XpressTRAK software. Accessories include a bar code scanner, weight kit, counterweight, and MXP Device stand. The AXP Platform MarrowXpress System is intended to be used in the clinical laboratory or intraoperatively at the point of care for preparation of a cell concentrate from bone marrow. The MXP Device separates the bone marrow aspirate into red blood cells, plasma, and buffy coat utilizing a standard laboratory centrifuge, and meters each of these components into a separate compartment within the disposable Processing Set. The Processing Set is provided sterile with a non-pyrogenic fluid pathway, and is for single use only. After processing, the MXP Device is placed into the AC powered Docking Station. The Docking Station automatically downloads processing data into the XpressTRAK software and recharges the MXP Device battery pack. The following information is communicated to the XpressTRAK software via a serial connection: MXP Device serial number, errors detected during processing, duration of processing, g force during processing, and mass calculation data. The XpressTRAK application software manages and stores the bone marrow processing data, verifies operational status of the system, and has report production capabilities. The software permits the user to search and sort collected data using the following fields: centrifuge ID, bone marrow aspirate unit number, Processing Bag Set lot number, buffy coat volume, user-definable fields, user name, or date and time.
The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for the AXP Platform MarrowXpress™ System. It discusses the device's substantial equivalence to a predicate device and its indications for use. However, it does not contain the detailed information necessary to answer the questions about acceptance criteria, specific study results, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or expert involvement as requested.
The document states: "A comparison of device features and in-vitro test data (TNC, MNC, platelet and stem cell recovery, cell viability and concentrate hematocrit) demonstrate that the AXP Platform MarrowXpress System is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed Harvest Technologies SmartPReP2 Centrifyae System." This indicates that some form of in-vitro testing was performed, but the specifics of that testing (acceptance criteria, methodologies, sample sizes, etc.) are not present in the provided text.
Therefore, I cannot fill in the table or answer the specific questions based solely on the given information.
Based on the provided text, I can only state the following:
- A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: Not provided in the document. The document mentions "in-vitro test data (TNC, MNC, platelet and stem cell recovery, cell viability and concentrate hematocrit)" were used for comparison, but the acceptance criteria or specific performance values are not listed.
- Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance: Not provided in the document.
- Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable or not provided. This device is a semi-automated system for processing bone marrow, not an AI diagnostic tool requiring expert interpretation for ground truth.
- Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable or not provided.
- If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This is not an AI diagnostic device for human interpretation.
- If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: The device is described as "semi-automated" and "algorithm only" performance is not explicitly discussed beyond its mechanical functions. The performance mentioned ("TNC, MNC, platelet and stem cell recovery, cell viability and concentrate hematocrit") would be standalone performance of the system's processing capabilities.
- The type of ground truth used: Not explicitly stated, but for "TNC, MNC, platelet and stem cell recovery, cell viability and concentrate hematocrit," the ground truth would typically be established through validated manual laboratory techniques (e.g., flow cytometry, hemocytometer counts) performed on the raw or processed samples.
- The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This is not a machine learning model that requires a training set in the conventional sense.
- How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo features a stylized depiction of an eagle or bird-like figure with three curved lines forming its body and wings. The logo is surrounded by the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged in a circular fashion.
ThermoGenesis Corporation c/o John R. chapman, Ph.D. VP, Scientific Affairs and R&D] 2711 Citrus Road Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Mail Center-WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
MAR 2 9 2010
Ré: K081345
Trade/Device Name: AXP Platform MarrowXpress™ System Model 8-5137, 8-5138 and 8-5139
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862-2050
Regulation Name: General purpose laboratory equipment labeled or promoted for a specific medical use
Regulatory Class: Class I Exempt Product Code: JQC Dated: May 12, 2008 Received: May 14, 2008
Dear Dr. Chapman:
This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of July 10, 2008.
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
The Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety has determined that there is reasonable likelihood that this device will be used for an intended use not identified in the proposed labeling and that such use could cause harm. Therefore, in accordance with Section 510(i)(1)(E) of the Act, the following limitation must appear in the Warnings and Precautions section of the devices labeling:
The safety and effectiveness of this device for in vivo indications for use has not been established.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - John R. Chapman, Ph.D.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA). it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition. FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
xim. Char
Maria M. Chan, Ph.D. Director Division of Immunology and Hematology Devices Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications For Use
510(k) Number (If known): K081345
Device Name: AXP Platform MarrowXpress™ System
Indications For Use:
The AXP Platform MarrowXpress System is intended to be used in the clinical laboratory or intraoperatively at the point of care for preparation of a cell concentrate from boncomation of
Prescription Use __ X (Per 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use (Per 21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
ાર્ક
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW TIIIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
-- . -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Josephine Banta dei
In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safe
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Summary
| SUBMITTER: | ThermoGenesis Corporation2711 Citrus RoadRancho Cordova, CA 95742 USA |
|---|---|
| CONTACT PERSON: | John Chapman, PhDVP, Scientific Affairs and R&DPhone: (916) 858-5132Fax: (916) 858-5199 |
| DATE PREPARED: | May 12, 2008 |
| DEVICE TRADE NAME: | AXP Platform MarrowXpress System |
| COMMON/USUAL NAME: | General Purpose Laboratory Equipment for Clinical Use |
| CLASSIFICATION NAME: | General Purpose Laboratory Equipment Labeled or Promoted for aSpecific Medical Use (21 CFR 862.2050) |
| PREDICATE DEVICE: | Harvest Technologies SmartPReP2 System (K052925) |
DEVICE DESCRIPTION:
The AXP Platform MarrowXpress System is a semi-automated, closed system that harvests a precise, operator-determined volume of stem cell-rich buffy coat from human bone marrow. The system consists of the following major components 1) disposable Processing Bag Set, 2) rechargeable NiMH batterypowered MXP Device, 3) AC-powered Docking Station, and 4) XpressTRAK software. Accessories include a bar code scanner, weight kit, counterweight, and MXP Device stand. The AXP Platform MarrowXpress System is intended to be used in the clinical laboratory or intraoperatively at the point of care for preparation of a cell concentrate from bone marrow.
The MXP Device separates the bone marrow aspirate into red blood cells, plasma, and buffy coat utilizing a standard laboralory centrifuge, and meters each of these components into a separate compartment within the disposable Processing Set. The Processing Set is provided sterile with a non-pyrogenic fluid pathway, and is for single use only.
After processing, the MXP Device is placed into the AC powered Docking Station. The Docking Station automatically downloads processing data into the XpressTRAK software and recharges the MXP Device battery pack. The following information is communicated to the XpressTRAK software via a serial connection: MXP Device serial number, errors detected during processing, duration of processing, g force during processing, and mass calculation data.
The XpressTRAK application software manages and stores the bone marrow processing data, verifies operational status of the system. and has report production capabilities. The software permits the user to search and sort collected data using the following fields: centrifuge ID, bone marrow aspirate unit number, Processing Bag Set lot number, buffy coat volume, user-definable fields, user name, or date and time,
STATEMENT OF TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS COMPARISON
A comparison of device features and in-vitro test data (TNC, MNC, platelet and stem cell recovery, cell viability and concentrate hematocrit) demonstrate that the AXP Platform MarrowXpress System is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed Harvest Technologies SmartPReP2 Centrifyae System.
§ 862.2050 General purpose laboratory equipment labeled or promoted for a specific medical use.
(a)
Identification. General purpose laboratory equipment labeled or promoted for a specific medical use is a device that is intended to prepare or examine specimens from the human body and that is labeled or promoted for a specific medical use.(b)
Classification. Class I (general controls). The device is identified in paragraph (a) of this section and is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9. The device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.