(99 days)
The proposed device is intended for maintaining esophageal luminal patency in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors, and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistula
The proposed WallFlex™ Partially Covered Esophageal Stent System consists of a selfexpanding metal stent and a delivery system. The proposed stent is manufactured of Nitinol and offered with a partial silicone covering. The stent configurations include two diameters, a 18mm body diameter with a 23mm flare, and a 23mm body diameter with a 28mm flare and three lengths. The 18mm body diameter stent is offered in 103mm, 123mm, and 153mm stent lengths. The 23mm body diameter stent is offered in 105mm, 125mm, and 155mm stent lengths. The proposed delivery system consists of a coaxial tubing assembly that constrains the stent on the delivery catheter shaft until the stent is released.
The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the "WallFlex™ Partially Covered Esophageal Stent System." This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device rather than presenting new clinical study data with specific acceptance criteria, and thus the structure of the prompt is not fully applicable.
Here's an analysis based on the information available:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
No specific acceptance criteria or quantitative performance metrics are provided in the document. The submission states that "Comparative performance testing was performed to establish substantial equivalence between the proposed WallFlex™ Partially Covered Esophageal Stent System, and the predicate devices." This testing included, but was not limited to:
- Dimensional evaluation
- Radial expansion force
- Radial compression force
- Deployment and reconstrainment force
- Bond integrity
Since this is a 510(k) submission, the "acceptance criteria" for these tests would typically be that the device performs equivalently to the predicate devices or within established design specifications. However, the exact thresholds or comparative results are not detailed in this summary.
| Acceptance Criteria (Inferred) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Equivalent dimensional properties to predicate devices. | Comparative testing performed. |
| Equivalent radial expansion force to predicate devices. | Comparative testing performed. |
| Equivalent radial compression force to predicate devices. | Comparative testing performed. |
| Equivalent deployment and reconstrainment force to predicate devices. | Comparative testing performed. |
| Equivalent bond integrity to predicate devices. | Comparative testing performed. |
Note: The document only states that comparative testing was performed, but does not provide the specific results or numerical acceptance thresholds for these tests.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and the Data Provenance
The document does not specify the sample size used for the comparative performance testing. It also does not mention data provenance in terms of country of origin or whether the data was retrospective or prospective, as the testing described appears to be bench testing or in-vitro performance evaluation rather than clinical data.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of those Experts
Not applicable. The performance data discussed relates to physical device characteristics and engineering tests, not clinical evaluations requiring expert-established ground truth.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable, as no clinical test set requiring adjudication is mentioned.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done
No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. The submission is for a medical device (esophageal stent) and focuses on engineering and performance characteristics compared to predicate devices, not on the interpretation of medical images by human readers.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This device is a physical stent and delivery system, not an algorithm or AI system.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for the performance testing would be the established engineering specifications and the performance characteristics of the predicate devices. For example, for "dimensional evaluation," the ground truth would be the design specifications and the dimensions of the predicate devices. For "force" tests, the ground truth would be the expected force ranges or the force measurements of the predicate devices. This type of "ground truth" is not established by experts in the clinical sense, but by engineering design and testing.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device, and no "training set" in that context is mentioned or implied.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
Not applicable, as there is no training set for an AI/ML algorithm mentioned.
{0}------------------------------------------------
X073266
page 1 of 2
FEB 2 7 2008
510(k) Summary
SECTION 5
1. Submitter:
Boston Scientific Corporation 100 Boston Scientific Way Marlborough, MA 01760-1537
Contact: Neil Kelly Regulatory Affairs Specialist Date Prepared: October 30, 2007
2. Device:
Trade Name: WallFlex™ Partially Covered Esophageal Stent System Common Name: Esophageal Stent Classification Name: Prosthesis, Esophageal Product Code: ESW Classification: Class II per 21 CFR 878.3610
3. Predicate Devices:
Stent:
Ultraflex™ Covered Esophageal NG Stent System (K032930, K012883, K955347, and K940838) Wallstent™ Esophageal II Stent (K940395) Polyflex™ Esophageal Stent System (K030559 and K010068)
Delivery System:
Wallflex™ Enteral Colonic Stent System and Anchor Lock Delivery System (K042065)
4. Device Description:
The proposed WallFlex™ Partially Covered Esophageal Stent System consists of a selfexpanding metal stent and a delivery system. The proposed stent is manufactured of Nitinol and offered with a partial silicone covering. The stent configurations include two diameters, a 18mm body diameter with a 23mm flare, and a 23mm body diameter with a 28mm flare and three lengths. The 18mm body diameter stent is offered in 103mm, 123mm, and 153mm stent lengths. The 23mm body diameter stent is offered in 105mm, 125mm, and 155mm stent lengths. The proposed delivery system consists of a coaxial tubing assembly that constrains the stent on the delivery catheter shaft until the stent is released.
Premarket Notification, WallFlex Partially Covered Esophageal Stent System Proprietary and Confidential Information of Boston Scientific Corporation
{1}------------------------------------------------
1072266 2 of 2
5. Intended Use:
The proposed device is intended for maintaining esophageal luminal patency in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors, and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistula
6. Technological Characteristics:
The proposed WallFlex™ Partially Covered Esophageal Stent System has similar technological characteristics as the predicate devices. The proposed stent combines the design features of the Ultraflex™ Covered Esophageal NG stent, the Wallstent Esophageal II stent, and the Polyflex Esophageal Stent system. The proposed delivery system has similar technological characteristics to the predicate Wallflex Enteral Colonic Stent System with Anchor Lock Delivery System.
7. Performance Data:
Comparative performance testing was performed to establish substantial equivalence between the proposed WallFlex™ Partially Covered Esophageal Stent System, and the predicate devices. This testing included but was not limited to a dimensional evaluation, radial expansion force, radial compression force, deployment and reconstrainment force, and bond integrity.
8. Conclusion:
Boston Scientific Corporation has demonstrated that the proposed WallFlex™ Partially Covered Esophageal Stent System is substantially equivalent to Boston Scientific Corporation's currently marketed stent systems: Ultraflex™ Covered Esophageal NG Stent, Wallstent Esophageal II Stent System, Polyflex Esophageal Stent System, and the Wallflex Enteral Colonic Stent System with Anchor Lock Delivery System.
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three stripes representing human services, public health, and human potential. The eagle is positioned to the right of the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA", which is arranged in a circular fashion around the left side of the eagle.
FEB 2 7 2008
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Mr. Neil Kelly Regulatory Affairs Specialist Boston Scientific Corporation Endoscopy 100 Boston Scientific Wav MARLBOROUGH MA 01752-1234
Re: K073266
Trade/Device Name: WallFlex™ Partially Covered Esophageal Stent System Regulation Number: 21 CFR §878.3610 Regulation Name: Esophageal prosthesis Regulatory Class: II Product Code: ESW Dated: February 14, 2008 Received: February 19, 2008
Dear Mr. Kelly:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance at one of the following numbers, based on the regulation number at the top of this letter.
| 21 CFR 876.xxxx | (Gastroenterology/Renal/Urology) | 240-276-0115 |
|---|---|---|
| 21 CFR 884.xxxx | (Obstetrics/Gynecology) | 240-276-0115 |
| 21 CFR 892.xxxx | (Radiology) | 240-276-0120 |
| Other | 240-276-0100 |
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding postmarket surveillance, please contact CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometric's (OSB's) Division of Postmarket Surveillance at 240-276-3474. For questions regarding the reporting of device adverse events (Medical Device Reporting (MDR)), please contact the Division of Surveillance Systems at 240-276-3464. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely vours.
Nancy C Brogdon
Nancy C. Brogdon Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Page 2
{4}------------------------------------------------
SECTION 4 Indications for Use Statement
K073266
510(k) Number (if known): To Be Determined
Device Name: WallFlex™ Partially Covered Esophageal Stent System
Indications For Use:
The proposed device is intended for maintaining esophageal luminal patency in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic and/or extrinsic malignant tumors, and occlusion of concurrent esophageal fistula
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
000
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
| (Division Sign-Off) | |
|---|---|
| Division of Reproductive, Abdominal,and Radiological Devices | |
| 510(k) Number | K073266 |
Premarket Notification, WallFlex Partially Covered Esophageal Stent System Proprietary and Confidential Information of Boston Scientific Corporation
§ 878.3610 Esophageal prosthesis.
(a)
Identification. An esophageal prosthesis is a rigid, flexible, or expandable tubular device made of a plastic, metal, or polymeric material that is intended to be implanted to restore the structure and/or function of the esophagus. The metal esophageal prosthesis may be uncovered or covered with a polymeric material. This device may also include a device delivery system.(b)
Classification. Class II. The special control for this device is FDA's “Guidance for the Content of Premarket Notification Submissions for Esophageal and Tracheal Prostheses.”