(183 days)
The PM-50 Pulse Oximeter is a non-invasive, spot-check, oxygen saturation and pulse rate monitor. It operates only on battery power using existing PM-50 sensors labeled for patients ranging from neonates to adults.
The PM-50 is a flexible, portable, battery powered Pulse Oximeter. The PM-50 Pulse Oximeter acquires the physiological signals - oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate (PR). The signals are converted into digital data and processed, and the SpO2 and pulse rate values are calculated and displayed on LCD screen.
PM-50 uses a two-wavelength pulsatile system - red and infrared light - to obtain SpO2 based on the different light absorption of oxygenated and reduced hemoglobin. The light source in the finger sensor emits red and infrared light, which are partially absorbed and modulated by the arterial blood pulsation at the sensor site. The photodetector in finger sensor collects and converts the light into electronic signal which is proportional to the light intensity. The electronic signals are sent to the oximeter and processed by the oximeter's circuitry. Thereafter, the SpO2 and pulse rate are obtained and indicated on the LCD screen.
Here's the breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the PM-50 Pulse Oximeter, based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The submission primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than setting explicit, quantifiable clinical acceptance criteria for all aspects. However, some performance metrics and accuracy statements are made in comparison to the predicate.
| Metric / Parameter | Acceptance Criteria (Implied / Predicate) | Reported Device Performance (PM-50) |
|---|---|---|
| Pulse Rate Range | Predicate: 40-255 bpm | PM-50: 25-254 bpm |
| Pulse Rate Accuracy | Predicate: ±2 bpm at 40-100 bpm, ±2% at 100-255 bpm | PM-50: ±2 bpm (presumably across its full range, as no other range is specified) |
| SpO2 Saturation (Neonate, 70-100%) Accuracy | Predicate: ±2 digits | PM-50: ±3 digits |
| Compliance with Standards | N/A (General expectation to meet relevant standards) | IEC60601-1, IEC60601-1-2, IEC60601-1-4, EN865, EN475, ISO14971 (all met) |
| Safety | Comparable to predicate device, addressing risks like electrical shock, misdiagnosis. | Hazard analysis performed, device "as safe as" predicate. |
| Effectiveness | Comparable to predicate device. | Device "as effective as" and "performs as well as or better than" predicate. |
Note: The submission states that despite the difference in SpO2 accuracy for neonates, "the specification of the PM-50 meets with the EN865 standard," which would serve as the acceptance criteria for that specific parameter.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document mentions "clinical and laboratory testing" but does not specify the sample size for any clinical test set.
Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin for any clinical data, nor does it specify if the data was retrospective or prospective. It only mentions "clinical and laboratory testing."
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications
The document does not provide any information regarding the number of experts used or their qualifications for establishing ground truth in any clinical study. Given the nature of a pulse oximeter (measuring physiological signals directly), ground truth would typically be established through highly accurate reference instruments or arterial blood gas analysis, rather than expert consensus on images or interpretations.
4. Adjudication Method
The document does not mention any adjudication method for a test set. This is consistent with a device that provides direct physiological measurements, where "ground truth" is typically an objective measurement from a reference device.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done or reported. The device is a diagnostic tool for measuring SpO2 and pulse rate, not a device that involves human interpretation of complex medical images or data. Therefore, the concept of "human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance" does not apply.
6. Standalone Performance Study
Yes, a standalone performance study was done. The document states:
- "Laboratory testing was conducted to validate and verify that the PM-50 Pulse Oximeter met all design specifications..."
- "Additional testing was performed to demonstrate compliance with the Finally, a hazard analysis of the system and its software was performed and testing was conducted to validate the systems overall operation."
- "The PM-50 Pulse Oximeter has also been tested to assure compliance to the requirements of various published standards, including IEC60601-1, IEC60601-1-2, IEC60601-1-4, EN865, EN475, and ISO14971."
This testing confirms the device's performance characteristics (e.g., accuracy, ranges, safety) without human intervention in the interpretative loop.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
While not explicitly detailed, for a pulse oximeter, the ground truth would typically be established through:
- Reference Instrumentation: Comparison against highly accurate, gold-standard pulse oximeters or CO-oximeters.
- Arterial Blood Gas Analysis (ABG): Directly measuring arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) from blood samples for comparison with SpO2 readings.
The document refers to "clinical and laboratory testing," which would imply the use of such objective measurements as ground truth.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
The document does not specify any sample size for a training set. Pulse oximeters generally rely on physiological models and signal processing algorithms derived from established principles, not typically machine learning that requires a "training set" in the conventional sense (e.g., for image recognition). If any adaptive algorithms are used, the training data and methods are not described.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Since no training set is mentioned in the context of machine learning, there is no information provided on how ground truth for a training set was established. The device's operation is described based on "two-wavelength pulsatile system - red and infrared light - to obtain SpO2 based on the different light absorption of oxygenated and reduced hemoglobin," which is a physics-based approach rather than a data-driven machine learning approach requiring a labeled training set.
{0}------------------------------------------------
and and the country of the state of the state of the state the state the many for
f
510(k) SUMMARY Exhibit #1:
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR § 807.92.
The assigned 510(k) number is: _ KOS2693
Submitter:
Shenzhen Mindray Bio-medical Electronics Co., LTD Mindray Building, Keji 12th Road South, Hi-tech Industrial Park, Nanshan, Shenzhen, 518057, P. R. China
Tel: +86 755 2658 2888
Fax: +86 755 2658 2680
Contact Person: ●
Li Dongling Shenzhen Mindray Bio-medical Electronics Co., LTD Mindray Building, Keji 12th Road South, Hi-tech Industrial Park, Nanshan, Shenzhen, 518057, P. R. China
- Date Prepared: .
January 15, 2006
Name of the device:
- Trade/Proprietary Name: PM-50 Pulse Oximeter ●
- Common Name: Oximeter .
- Classification ●
| 21 CFR 870.2700 Oximeter, Pulse | Class II |
|---|---|
| 21 CFR 870.2710 Ear Oximeter, Pulse | Class II |
Legally Marketed Predicate Device:
Datex-Ohmeda TuffSat 3000 Pulse Oximeter(by Datex-Ohmeda Inc.) K001688
{1}------------------------------------------------
Description:
The PM-50 is a flexible, portable, battery powered Pulse Oximeter. The PM-50 Pulse Oximeter acquires the physiological signals - oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate (PR). The signals are converted into digital data and processed, and the SpO2 and pulse rate values are calculated and displayed on LCD screen.
PM-50 uses a two-wavelength pulsatile system - red and infrared light - to obtain SpO2 based on the different light absorption of oxygenated and reduced hemoglobin. The light source in the finger sensor emits red and infrared light, which are partially absorbed and modulated by the arterial blood pulsation at the sensor site. The photodetector in finger sensor collects and converts the light into electronic signal which is proportional to the light intensity. The electronic signals are sent to the oximeter and processed by the oximeter's circuitry. Thereafter, the SpO2 and pulse rate are obtained and indicated on the LCD screen.
Statement of intended Use:
The PM-50 Pulse Oximeter is a non-invasive, spot-check, oxygen saturation and pulse rate monitor. It operates only on battery power using existing PM-50 sensors labeled for patients ranging from neonates to adults.
Comparison of Technological Characteristics:
The PM-50 Pulse Oximeter is substantially equivalent to Datex-Ohmeda TuffSat 3000 Pulse Oximeter. The design, components, energy source of the PM-50 Pulse Oximeter is similar to its predicate device. The system provides a means for interfacing with a patient, collecting parameter specific physiological signals. Then the signals are converted into digital data and processed, and the SpO2 and pulse rate values are calculated and displayed on LCD screen.
There is only one notable difference between the technical specifications of the PM-50 and the TuffSat 3000. This difference is the Pulse Rate Range and accuracy and SpO2 saturation accuracy. The Pulse Rate of the PM-50 is 25254bpm and the accuracy is ±2 bpm, while the TuffSat is 40255bpm and the accuracy is ±2 bpm at 40 to 100 bpm, ant ±2% at 100 to 255 bpm; the SpO2 saturation accuracy for Neonate, between 70%~100%, for PM-50 is ±3 digits but the TuffSat is ±2 digits. In this instance, however, the specification of the PM-50 meets with the EN865 standard.
These technological differences do not affect the safety or efficacy of the device. Any
{2}------------------------------------------------
safety issues that may be raised by a software controlled medical device are the same issues already addressed by the predicate device and are addressed in the systems hazard analysis and in the system validation.
Testing:
Laboratory testing was conducted to validate and verify that the PM-50 Pulse Oximeter met all design specifications and was substantially equivalent to the predicate device. Datex-Ohmeda TuffSat 3000 Pulse Oximeter. This testing consisted of all environmental testing identified in the FDA's DCRND November 1993 "Reviewer Guidance Document for Premarket notification Submissions" Draft Guidance Document. Additional testing was performed to demonstrate compliance with the Finally, a hazard analysis of the system and its software was performed and testing was conducted to validate the systems overall operation. The PM-50 Pulse Oximeter has also been tested to assure compliance to the requirements of various published standards, including IEC60601-1, IEC60601-1-2, IEC60601-1-4, EN865, EN475, and ISO14971.
Although the device is neither life supporting nor life sustaining, diagnostic information derived from the use of the device and alarms generated by the device may be critical to the proper management of the patient. So, the areas of risk for this device are the same as other devices in this class, and the following:
-
. Electrical shock
Excessive electrical chassis leakage current can disturb the normal electrophysiology of the heart. -
. Misdiagnosis
- -Inadequate design of the signal processing and measurement circuitry or program can lead generation of inaccurate diagnostic data.. If inaccurate diagnostic data are used in managing the patient, the physician may prescribe a course of treatment that places the patient at risk unnecessarily.
- ー Inadequate design of the device's software, used to make various measurements, can lead to generation of inaccurate diagnostic data. If inaccurate diagnostic data are used in managing the patient, the physician may prescribe a course of treatment that places the patient at risk unnecessarily.
- | Inadequate design of the systems ability to alert the users through audible and
visual indicators, can lead to user mistrust and/or inadequate response to the patient's condition. If an inadequate response to the patient's condition should occur the patient may unnecessarily be placed at risk.
{3}------------------------------------------------
ﻟﻤﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘ
Conclusion:
The conclusions drawn from clinical and laboratory testing of the PM-50 Pulse Oximeter demonstrates that the device is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as or better than the legally marketed predicate device, the Datex-Ohmeda TuffSat 3000 Pulse Oximeter numbered K#001688 (by Datex-Ohmeda Inc.).
.
west we was and the comment commend in would
{4}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health and Human Services (USA). The seal features the department's name encircling a symbol of a stylized human figure. The text is arranged in a circular pattern around the central emblem, which consists of three abstract human profiles facing right.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
MAR 3 0 2006
Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Company, Limited C/O Ms. Susan D. Goldstein-Falk MDI Consultants, Incorporated 55 Northern Boulevard, Suite 200 Great Neck, New York 11021
Re: K052693
Trade/Device Name: PM-50 Pulse Oximeter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.2700 Regulation Name: Oximeter Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DQA Dated: March 20, 2006 Received: March 21, 2006
Dear Ms. Goldstein-Falk:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Susan D. Goldstein-Falk
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0115. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours.
Chiu Lin, Ph.D.
Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{6}------------------------------------------------
Exhibit B
Indications for Use
Page __ 1___ of __ 1 __
510(k) Number (if known): K#052693
Device Name: PM-50 Pulse Oximeter
Indications For Use:
The PM-50 Pulse Oximeter is a non-invasive, spot-check, oxygen saturation and pulse rate monitor. It operates only on battery power using existing PM-50 sensors labeled for patients ranging from neonates to adults.
Prescription Use _ X (Per 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
OR
Over-The Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
| Audiology General Hospital | |
| Dental Devices | |
| K052693 |
§ 870.2700 Oximeter.
(a)
Identification. An oximeter is a device used to transmit radiation at a known wavelength(s) through blood and to measure the blood oxygen saturation based on the amount of reflected or scattered radiation. It may be used alone or in conjunction with a fiberoptic oximeter catheter.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).