K Number
K012854
Date Cleared
2001-11-21

(89 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
870.1340
Panel
CV
Reference & Predicate Devices
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Renal Guiding Sheath is intended for the introduction of interventional and diagnostic devices into the human vasculature including but not limited to the renal arteries.

Device Description

The Renal Guiding Sheath is designed to perform as a guiding catheter and an introducer sheath. The sheath is coil reinforced, has a radiopaque marker and is hydrophilically coated on the distal 5 cm. It comes packaged with a dilator, a rotating hemostatic valve (or a detachable hemostatic valve), and a dilator retaining clip.

AI/ML Overview

This document describes a medical device, the "Renal Guiding Sheath," and its submission for FDA clearance. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not on AI/algorithm performance. Therefore, many of the requested fields related to AI, ground truth, and expert evaluation are not applicable.

Here's an analysis based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Acceptance Criteria (Performance Tests)Reported Device Performance (Reference to Predicate)
PenetrationSubstantially equivalent to Super Arrow-Flex Percutaneous Sheath Introducer Set
Kink ResistanceSubstantially equivalent to Super Arrow-Flex Percutaneous Sheath Introducer Set
LeakageSubstantially equivalent to Super Arrow-Flex Percutaneous Sheath Introducer Set
Tensile StrengthSubstantially equivalent to Super Arrow-Flex Percutaneous Sheath Introducer Set
Tortuous Path / DurabilitySubstantially equivalent to Super Arrow-Flex Percutaneous Sheath Introducer Set
Sterility Assurance Level (SAL)10^-6 (validated according to ANSI / AAMI / ISO 11135-1994)
BiocompatibilityBlood contacting materials found to be biocompatible (tested in accordance with FDA General Program Memorandum #G95-1 / ISO 10993)
Expiration Dating30 months

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

This document does not specify sample sizes for each performance test. The data provenance is not mentioned beyond the fact that tests were performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence. It is likely internal testing without country-of-origin specification, and it is implied to be prospective testing (performance evaluations of the new device).

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

Not applicable. This device is a physical medical instrument, not an AI or diagnostic algorithm that requires expert-established ground truth for its performance evaluation in this context. The performance tests are engineering and biological evaluations.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

Not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are typically used for expert review of images or clinical cases to establish ground truth for AI algorithms. For physical device performance tests, standards and objective measurements are used.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This document describes a physical medical device, not an AI system. Therefore, no MRMC study or AI assistance effect size is relevant.

6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable. This is not an algorithm, so standalone performance is not relevant.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

For the performance tests:

  • Engineering Standards / Objective Measurements: For tests like Penetration, Kink Resistance, Leakage, Tensile Strength, and Tortuous Path / Durability, the "ground truth" would be the successful adherence to pre-defined engineering specifications and measurable performance within acceptable limits, often compared directly to the predicate device's measured performance.
  • Validated Standards: For sterilization, the ground truth is established by validation against ANSI / AAMI / ISO 11135-1994 to achieve a specified SAL.
  • Biocompatibility Standards: For biocompatibility, the ground truth is conformity with test recommendations in FDA General Program Memorandum #G95-1 (ISO 10993).

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

Not applicable. This is a physical device, not an AI algorithm requiring a training set.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

Not applicable. This is a physical device, not an AI algorithm.

§ 870.1340 Catheter introducer.

(a)
Identification. A catheter introducer is a sheath used to facilitate placing a catheter through the skin into a vein or artery.(b)
Classification. Class II (performance standards).