K Number
K251868

Validate with FDA (Live)

Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2025-09-25

(99 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
866.3990
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay is a multiplex real-time PCR in vitro diagnostic test for the rapid and qualitative detection and differentiation of Salmonella, Shigella/Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), Campylobacter (C. coli, C. jejuni) nucleic acids and Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli Shiga toxins 1 and 2 (undifferentiated) genes. Nucleic acids are isolated and purified from Cary-Blair preserved stool specimens collected from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis.

This assay is intended to aid in the differential diagnosis of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shigella/Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) and Shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) infections. The results of this assay should be used in conjunction with clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and epidemiological information and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions. Positive results do not rule out co-infection with other organisms that are not detected by this test and may not be the sole or definitive cause of patient illness. Negative results in the setting of clinical illness compatible with gastroenteritis may be due to infection by pathogens that are not detected by this test, or non-infectious causes such as ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, or Crohn's disease. This assay is designed for use on the Panther Fusion System.

Device Description

The Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay is a multiplex real-time PCR in vitro diagnostic test developed for use on the fully automated Panther Fusion system to detect nucleic acids from Salmonella, Shigella/Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), Campylobacter (C. coli, C. jejuni) and Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli Shiga toxins 1 and 2 (undifferentiated) genes.

The Panther Fusion System fully automates specimen processing, including sample lysis, nucleic acid capture, amplification, and detection for the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay. Nucleic acid capture and elution takes place in a single tube on the Panther Fusion System. The eluate is transferred to the Panther Fusion System reaction tube containing the assay reagents. Multiplex real-time PCR is then performed for the eluted nucleic acid on the Panther Fusion System.

Sample processing: Prior to processing and testing on the Panther Fusion System, specimens are transferred to an Aptima Multitest tube containing specimen transport media (STM) that lyses the cells, releases target nucleic acid, and protects them from degradation during storage.

Nucleic acid capture and elution: An internal control (IC-B) is added automatically to each specimen via the working Panther Fusion Capture Reagent-B (wFCR-B) to monitor for interference during specimen processing, amplification, and detection caused by reagent failure or inhibitory substances. Specimens are first incubated in an alkaline reagent (FER-B) to enable cell lysis. Nucleic acid released during the lysis step hybridizes to magnetic particles in the wFCR-B. The capture particles are then separated from residual specimen matrix in a magnetic field by a series of wash steps with a mild detergent. The captured nucleic acid is then eluted from the magnetic particles with a reagent of low ionic strength (Panther Fusion Elution Buffer).

Multiplex PCR amplification and fluorescence detection: Lyophilized single unit dose reaction master mix is reconstituted with the Panther Fusion Reconstitution Buffer I and then combined with the eluted nucleic acid into a reaction tube. Panther Fusion Oil reagent is added to prevent evaporation during the PCR reaction. Target-specific primers and probes then amplify targets via polymerase chain reaction while simultaneously measuring fluorescence of the multiplexed targets. The Panther Fusion System compares the fluorescence signal to a predetermined cut-off to produce a qualitative result for the presence or absence of each analyte.

The analytes and the channel used for their detection on the Panther Fusion System are summarized in the table below:

AnalyteGene TargetedInstrument Channel
SalmonellaInvA (Invasive antigen A)FAM
CampylobacterglyA (serine hydroxymethyl transferase)/cadF (outer membrane fibronectin-binding protein)HEX
Shigella/EIECipaH (Invasion plasmid antigen H)ROX
STECstx1 (Shigatoxin 1)/stx2 (Shigatoxin 2)RED647
Internal ControlNot ApplicableRED677

Assay Components
The assay components configuration for the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay is analogous to the Panther Fusion Respiratory Assays. The reagents required to perform the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay are packaged and sold separately. There are 7 boxes containing 9 reagents which are required for sample processing. The Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay requires one ancillary kit and one specimen collection kit, neither of which are provided with the assay and can be acquired separately:

  1. Aptima Assay Fluids Kit (303014)
  2. Aptima Multitest Swab Specimen Collection Kit (PRD-03546)

Table 1: Reagents Required to Perform the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay

BoxComponents Description
Refrigerated BoxPanther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay Cartridges
Room Temperature BoxPanther Fusion Extraction Reagent-B
Refrigerated BoxPanther Fusion Internal Control-B
Room Temperature BoxPanther Fusion Reconstitution Buffer I
Room Temperature BoxPanther Fusion Elution Buffer
Room Temperature BoxPanther Fusion Oil
Refrigerated BoxPanther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay Controls

Table 2: Ancillary and Collection Kits Required to Perform the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay

Kit
Aptima Assay Fluids Kit
Aptima Multitest Swab Specimen Collection Kit

Instrumentation
The Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay has been designed for and validated on the Panther Fusion system. The Panther Fusion System fully automates specimen processing, including sample lysis, nucleic acid capture, amplification, and detection for the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay.

AI/ML Overview

N/A

FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter - Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay

Page 1

U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov

Doc ID # 04017.08.00

September 25, 2025

Hologic Inc.
Patricia Villarreal
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
10210 Genetic Center Drive
San Diego, California 92121

Re: K251868
Trade/Device Name: Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 866.3990
Regulation Name: Gastrointestinal Microorganism Multiplex Nucleic Acid-Based Assay
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: PCH, OOI
Dated: June 17, 2025
Received: June 18, 2025

Dear Patricia Villarreal:

We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"

Page 2

(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).

Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.

All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.

Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.

For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).

Page 3

Sincerely,

Bryan M. Grabias -S (Digitally signed by Bryan M. Grabias -S Date: 2025.09.25 11:15:10 -04'00')

Bryan Grabias, PhD
Acting Branch Chief
Bacterial Respiratory and Medical Countermeasures Branch
Division of Microbiology Devices
OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

Page 4

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration

Indications for Use

Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.

510(k) Number (if known): K251868

Device Name: Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay

Indications for Use (Describe)

The Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay is a multiplex real-time PCR in vitro diagnostic test for the rapid and qualitative detection and differentiation of Salmonella, Shigella/Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), Campylobacter (C. coli, C. jejuni) nucleic acids and Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli Shiga toxins 1 and 2 (undifferentiated) genes. Nucleic acids are isolated and purified from Cary-Blair preserved stool specimens collected from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis.

This assay is intended to aid in the differential diagnosis of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shigella/Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) and Shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) infections. The results of this assay should be used in conjunction with clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and epidemiological information and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions. Positive results do not rule out co-infection with other organisms that are not detected by this test and may not be the sole or definitive cause of patient illness. Negative results in the setting of clinical illness compatible with gastroenteritis may be due to infection by pathogens that are not detected by this test, or non-infectious causes such as ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, or Crohn's disease. This assay is designed for use on the Panther Fusion System.

Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)

Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.


This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.

The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov

"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."

FORM FDA 3881 (8/23) Page 1 of 1 PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF

Page 5

510(k) SUMMARY

Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay

I. SUBMITTER:

Hologic, Inc.
10210 Genetic Center Drive
San Diego, CA 92121

Contact Person: Patricia Villarreal
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Patricia.Villarreal@hologic.com
Phone: 562.833.7906
Fax: N/A

Date Prepared: June 16, 2025

II. DEVICE

Proprietary Name: Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay

Classification Name: Gastrointestinal microorganism multiplex nucleic acid-based assay

Regulation Number: 21 CFR 866.3990 and 21 CFR 862.2570

Regulatory Class: Class II

Product Code: PCH and OOI

III. PREDICATE DEVICE

The predicate device for the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay is the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel (K160459, K143005 & K140407).


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 1 of 30

Page 6

IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION

The Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay is a multiplex real-time PCR in vitro diagnostic test developed for use on the fully automated Panther Fusion system to detect nucleic acids from Salmonella, Shigella/Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), Campylobacter (C. coli, C. jejuni) and Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli Shiga toxins 1 and 2 (undifferentiated) genes.

The Panther Fusion System fully automates specimen processing, including sample lysis, nucleic acid capture, amplification, and detection for the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay. Nucleic acid capture and elution takes place in a single tube on the Panther Fusion System. The eluate is transferred to the Panther Fusion System reaction tube containing the assay reagents. Multiplex real-time PCR is then performed for the eluted nucleic acid on the Panther Fusion System.

Sample processing: Prior to processing and testing on the Panther Fusion System, specimens are transferred to an Aptima Multitest tube containing specimen transport media (STM) that lyses the cells, releases target nucleic acid, and protects them from degradation during storage.

Nucleic acid capture and elution: An internal control (IC-B) is added automatically to each specimen via the working Panther Fusion Capture Reagent-B (wFCR-B) to monitor for interference during specimen processing, amplification, and detection caused by reagent failure or inhibitory substances. Specimens are first incubated in an alkaline reagent (FER-B) to enable cell lysis. Nucleic acid released during the lysis step hybridizes to magnetic particles in the wFCR-B. The capture particles are then separated from residual specimen matrix in a magnetic field by a series of wash steps with a mild detergent. The captured nucleic acid is then eluted from the magnetic particles with a reagent of low ionic strength (Panther Fusion Elution Buffer).

Multiplex PCR amplification and fluorescence detection: Lyophilized single unit dose reaction master mix is reconstituted with the Panther Fusion Reconstitution Buffer I and then combined with the eluted nucleic acid into a reaction tube. Panther Fusion Oil reagent is added to prevent evaporation during the PCR reaction.


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 2 of 30

Page 7

Target-specific primers and probes then amplify targets via polymerase chain reaction while simultaneously measuring fluorescence of the multiplexed targets. The Panther Fusion System compares the fluorescence signal to a predetermined cut-off to produce a qualitative result for the presence or absence of each analyte.

The analytes and the channel used for their detection on the Panther Fusion System are summarized in the table below:

AnalyteGene TargetedInstrument Channel
SalmonellaInvA (Invasive antigen A)FAM
CampylobacterglyA (serine hydroxymethyl transferase)/cadF (outer membrane fibronectin-binding protein)HEX
Shigella/EIECipaH (Invasion plasmid antigen H)ROX
STECstx1 (Shigatoxin 1)/stx2 (Shigatoxin 2)RED647
Internal ControlNot ApplicableRED677

Assay Components

The assay components configuration for the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay is analogous to the Panther Fusion Respiratory Assays. The reagents required to perform the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay are packaged and sold separately. There are 7 boxes containing 9 reagents which are required for sample processing. The Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay requires one ancillary kit and one specimen collection kit, neither of which are provided with the assay and can be acquired separately:

  1. Aptima Assay Fluids Kit (303014)
  2. Aptima Multitest Swab Specimen Collection Kit (PRD-03546)

Table 1: Reagents Required to Perform the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay

BoxComponents Description
Refrigerated BoxPanther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay Cartridges
Room Temperature BoxPanther Fusion Extraction Reagent-B

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 3 of 30

Page 8

  • Panther Fusion Capture Reagent-B bottles
  • Panther Fusion Enhancer Reagent-B bottles
BoxComponents Description
Refrigerated BoxPanther Fusion Internal Control-B
Room Temperature BoxPanther Fusion Reconstitution Buffer I
Room Temperature BoxPanther Fusion Elution Buffer
Room Temperature BoxPanther Fusion Oil
Refrigerated BoxPanther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay Controls
- Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Positive Control
- Panther Fusion Negative Control

Table 2: Ancillary and Collection Kits Required to Perform the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay

Kit
Aptima Assay Fluids Kit
Aptima Multitest Swab Specimen Collection Kit

Instrumentation

The Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay has been designed for and validated on the Panther Fusion system. The Panther Fusion System fully automates specimen processing, including sample lysis, nucleic acid capture, amplification, and detection for the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay.

V. INDICATIONS FOR USE

The Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay is a multiplex real-time PCR in vitro diagnostic test for the rapid and qualitative detection and differentiation of Salmonella, Shigella/Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), Campylobacter (C. coli, C. jejuni) nucleic acids and Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli Shiga toxins 1 and 2 (undifferentiated) genes.


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 4 of 30

Page 9

Nucleic acids are isolated and purified from Cary-Blair preserved stool specimens collected from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis.

This assay is intended to aid in the differential diagnosis of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shigella/Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) and Shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) infections. The results of this assay should be used in conjunction with clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and epidemiological information and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions. Positive results do not rule out co-infection with other organisms that are not detected by this test and may not be the sole or definitive cause of patient illness. Negative results in the setting of clinical illness compatible with gastroenteritis may be due to infection by pathogens that are not detected by this test, or non-infectious causes such as ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, or Crohn's disease. This assay is designed for use on the Panther Fusion System.


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 5 of 30

Page 10

VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE

A comparison of the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay to the predicate BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel (K160459, K143005 & K140407) is summarized in Table 3.

Table 3: Comparison of Similarities and Differences Between the Predicate Device (BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel) and the Subject Device (Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay)

Predicate BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal (GI) PanelSubject Hologic Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay
ClassificationClass IIClass II
Regulation no./Product code21CFR 866.3990 PCH, OOI21CFR 866.3990 PCH, OOI
Intended useThe FilmArray Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel is a qualitative multiplexed nucleic acid based in vitro diagnostic test intended for use with FilmArray systems. The FilmArray GI Panel is capable of the simultaneous detection and identification of nucleic acids from multiple bacteria, viruses, and parasites directly from stool samples in Cary Blair transport media obtained from individuals with signs and/or symptoms of gastrointestinal infection. The following bacteria (including several diarrheagenic E. coli/Shigella pathotypes), parasites, and viruses are identified using the FilmArray GI Panel: Campylobacter (C. jejuni/C. coli/C. upsaliensis) Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) toxin A/B Plesiomonas shigelloides SalmonellaThe Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay is a multiplex real-time PCR in vitro diagnostic test for the rapid and qualitative detection and differentiation of Salmonella, Shigella/Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), Campylobacter (C. coli, C. jejuni) nucleic acids and Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli Shiga toxins 1 and 2 (undifferentiated) genes. Nucleic acids are isolated and purified from Cary-Blair preserved stool specimens collected from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis. This assay is intended to aid in the differential diagnosis of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shigella/Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), and Shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) infections. The results of this assay should be used in conjunction with clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and epidemiological information

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 6 of 30

Page 11

Predicate BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal (GI) PanelSubject Hologic Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay
Intended use (continued)Vibrio (V. parahaemolyticus/V. vulnificus/V. cholerae), including specific identification of Vibrio cholerae Yersinia enterocolitica Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) lt/st Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) stx1/stx2 (including specific identification of the E. coli O157 serogroup within STEC) Shigella/Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) Cryptosporidium Cyclospora cayetanensis Entamoeba histolytica Giardia lamblia (also known as G. intestinalis and G. duodenalis) Adenovirus F 40/41 Astrovirus Norovirus GI/GII Rotavirus A Sapovirus (Genogroups I, II, IV, and V) The FilmArray GI Panel is indicated as an aid in the diagnosis of specific agents of gastrointestinal illness and results are meant to be used in conjunction with other clinical, laboratory, and epidemiological data. Positive results do not rule out coinfection with organisms not included in the FilmArray GI Panel. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of the disease. Concomitant culture is necessary for organism recovery and further typing ofand should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment or other patient management decisions. Positive results do not rule out co-infection with other organisms that are not detected by this test and may not be the sole or definitive cause of patient illness. Negative results in the setting of clinical illness compatible with gastroenteritis may be due to infection by pathogens that are not detected by this test or non-infectious causes such as ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, or Crohn's disease. This assay is designed for use on the Panther Fusion System.

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 7 of 30

Page 12

Predicate BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal (GI) PanelSubject Hologic Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay
Intended use (continued)bacterial agents. This device is not intended to monitor or guide treatment for C. difficile infection. Due to the small number of positive specimens collected for certain organisms during the prospective clinical study, performance characteristics for E. coli O157, Plesiomonas shigelloides, Yersinia enterocolitica, Astrovirus, and Rotavirus A were established primarily with retrospective clinical specimens. Performance characteristics for Entamoeba histolytica, and Vibrio (V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and Vibrio cholerae) were established primarily using contrived clinical specimens. Negative FilmArray GI Panel results in the setting of clinical illness compatible with gastroenteritis may be due to infection by pathogens that are not detected by this test or non-infectious causes such as ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, or Crohn's disease. A gastrointestinal microorganism multiplex nucleic acid-based assay also aids in the detection and identification of acute gastroenteritis in the context of outbreaks.and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment or other patient management decisions. Positive results do not rule out co-infection with other organisms that are not detected by this test and may not be the sole or definitive cause of patient illness. Negative results in the setting of clinical illness compatible with gastroenteritis may be due to infection by pathogens that are not detected by this test or non-infectious causes such as ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, or Crohn's disease. This assay is designed for use on the Panther Fusion System.
TechnologyFully automated nucleic acid amplification, detection and result interpretation (multiplex PCR)Fully automated nucleic acid amplification, detection and result interpretation (multiplex PCR)
AnalyteRNA/DNADNA

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 8 of 30

Page 13

Predicate BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal (GI) PanelSubject Hologic Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay
Organism DetectedCampylobacter (C. jejuni/C. coli/C.upsaliensis), Clostridium difficile (C.difficile) toxin A/B, Plesiomonas shigelloides, Salmonella, Vibrio (V. parahaemolyticus/V. vulnificus/V. cholerae) including specific identification of Vibrio cholera, Yersinia enterocolitica, Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC), Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) lt/st, Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) stx1/stx2 (including specific identification of the E. coli O157 serogroup within STEC), Shigella/Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC),Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora cayetanensis, Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia (also known as G. intestinalis and G. duodenalis), Adenovirus F 40/41, Astrovirus, Norovirus GI/GII, Rotavirus A, and Sapovirus (Genogroups I,II, IV, and V).Salmonella, Shigella/EIEC, Campylobacter (C. coli, C. jejuni), Shiga toxins 1 and 2
Specimen TypesHuman stool in Cary Blair transport mediumHuman stool in Cary Blair transport medium
Sample PreparationAutomated sample processingAutomated sample processing
Intended UsersProfessional useProfessional use
Amplification modeNested multiplex PCRReal-time PCR
Detection modeFluorogenic double stranded DNA binding dyeFluorogenic target-specific hybridization
InstrumentationBioFire FilmArray SystemsPanther Fusion System
Time to ResultApproximately 1 hourApproximately 2.4 hours

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 9 of 30

Page 14

Predicate BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal (GI) PanelSubject Hologic Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay
ControlsTwo controls are included in each reagent pouch to control for sample processing and both stages of PCR and melt analysis.Internal control in each sample. External control processed at periodic interval

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 10 of 30

Page 15

VII. PERFORMANCE DATA

The following performance data (analytical and clinical) were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.

Brief Description of Analytical (Non-Clinical) Studies

The following analytical studies (non-clinical) were conducted to support the clearance of the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay on the Panther Fusion System.

Analytical Sensitivity - Limit of Detection (LoD)

The analytical sensitivity (Limit of Detection or LoD) of the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay was determined by testing dilutions of processed negative Cary-Blair Stool (CBS) matrix spiked with bacterial cultures of Salmonella (2 strains), Campylobacter (2 strains), Shigella/EIEC (2 strains) and STEC (2 strains). A minimum of 24 replicates were tested with each of 3 reagent lots. The LoD for each analyte was determined by Probit analysis for each reagent lot and was confirmed with an additional 24 replicates using a single reagent lot in single analyte and multi-analyte configurations. Analytical sensitivity is defined as the lowest concentration at which ≥95% of all replicates tested positive, as summarized in Table 4.

Table 4. Analytical Sensitivity

StrainLoD Concentration (CFU/mL)ᵃ
Aptima Multitest TubePreserved Stool
S.enterica subsp. enterica, serovar Typhimurium, I, 4,5,12:i:1,248960
Salmonella bongori, 66:z411092,180
Campylobacter coli16320
Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni25500
Shigella sonnei681,360
EIEC O29:NM23460
STEC O26:H11 (stx1/stx2)1062,120
STEC O157:H7 (stx1/stx2)20400

CFU = colony forming units.
ᵃ Analyte concentrations in Aptima Multitest tube are ~ 20X dilute compared to preserved stool (~150μL preserved stool in ~3 mL).


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 11 of 30

Page 16

Inclusivity/Reactivity – Wet Testing

The inclusivity/reactivity of the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay was determined by testing bacterial strains in the processed negative CBS matrix. Each strain was tested in triplicate at 3X LoD with 1 reagent lot in single or multi-analyte configuration. Table 5 shows the lowest concentration of each strain at which 100% positivity was observed.

Table 5. Inclusivity/Reactivity Summary for the GI Bacterial Assay Analytes

OrganismATCC# or SourceStrain/serovar/serotype/antigenic propertiesTest Concentration (3X LoD) (CFU/mL)
Aptima Multitest TubePreserved Stool
Salmonella bongori43975ᵃCIP 82.33ᵃ3276,540
13076Enteritidis, CDC K--18911442,880
14028ᵃTyphimurium, CDC 6516--60ᵃ1442,880
15791Sloterdijk1442,880
15611Vellore, V17961442,880
11646Illinois, CDC1442,880
8391Thompson, 29881442,880
19430Typhi, NCTC 83851442,880
7378Panama, Hochberg 24601442,880
6962Newport, NCTC 1291442,880
8388Muenchen, 541442,880
8326Heidelberg, 161442,880
9712Saintpaul, 1271442,880
8387Montevideo, 6231442,880
6539Typhi, AMC1442,880
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica (I)9150Paratyphi A1442,880
10719Paratyphi B, AMC 41-H-61442,880
13428Paratyphi C, CDC 3310-521442,880
33062Typhimurium, LJ2111442,880
13311Typhimurium, NCTC 741442,880
51956Hadar, CDC 3471442,880
51741DUP-1031442,880
10721Javiana, ETS 1461442,880
9239Oranienburg, E10931442,880
51955Virchow, CDC 411442,880
51957Agona, CDC 8731442,880

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 12 of 30

Page 17

Table 5. Inclusivity/Reactivity Summary for the GI Bacterial Assay Analytes (continued)

OrganismATCC# or SourceStrain/serovar/serotype/antigenic propertiesTest Concentration (3X LoD) (CFU/mL)
Aptima Multitest TubePreserved Stool
BAA-2739Mississippi, CDC 2012K-04871442,880
13312Choleraesuis, NCTC 57351442,880
700136Braenderup, NCTC 57501442,880
15480Dublin, HWS 511442,880
CCUG 21280Schwarzengrund1442,880
Salmonella enterica subsp. salamae (II)6959NCTC 22061442,880
Univ of Calgary2425 argC951442,880
700148NCTC 102521442,880
43972CIP 82.291442,880
Salmonella enterica subsp. arizonae (IIIa)12323CDC 3153--551442,880
12324CDC 1089-531442,880
13314NCTC 82971442,880
12325CDC1442,880
Salmonella enterica subsp. diarizonae (IIIb)29226CDC 656/751442,880
43973CIP 82.311442,880
Salmonella enterica subsp. houtenae (IV)2993216:z4,z23: -1442,880
43976CIP 1025011442,880
Salmonella enterica subsp. indica (VI)Univ of CalgarypyrE201442,880
Shigella dysenteriae (A)13313Type 1, NCTC 48372044,080
49555Type 13, CDC 8008-792044,080
29028Type 3, CDC 3596-742044,080
49551Type 12, CDC 2243-662044,080
11835AMC 43--A--12044,080
9361Type 1, AMC 43-A-142044,080
12021Type 8, CDC 2116-522044,080
12037Type 9, CDC A-58:16462044,080
49547Type 11, CDC 3883-662044,080
Shigella flexneri (B)29903Type 2a, 245702044,080
12022Type 2b, CDC 3591-522044,080
9199Type 1a, AMC 43-G-682044,080

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 13 of 30

Page 18

OrganismATCC# or SourceStrain/serovar/serotype/antigenic propertiesTest Concentration (3X LoD) (CFU/mL)
Aptima Multitest TubePreserved Stool
33948612-0032044,080
Shigella flexneri (B)11836Type 3, AMC 43-G-1002044,080
12023Type 4a, CDC 5380-522044,080
12025Type 6, CDC 642044,080
700930Type 2a, 2457T2044,080
8700Type 2, NCTC 129852044,080
29928Type10, C-102044,080
9207Type 1, AMC 43-G-582044,080
BAA-1247Type20, SH-1082044,080
Shigella boydii (C)12030Type 10, CDC 6336-522044,080
12028Type 82044,080
12031Type 11, CDC 1624-542044,080
9905Type 7, AMC 40062044,080
9290AMC 43-GG92044,080
29930ᵃWRAIR I virulentᵃ2044,080
Shigella sonnei (D)1106046282044,080
29031CDC 45-752044,080
25931NCDC 1120-662044,080
Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC)43893TypeO124:NM, CDC EDL 1284691,380
BAA-2190TypeO121, 98-3306691,380
49105TypeO15, 1/1/7482691,380
12806Type O124:K72 (B17):H, CDC691,380
43892ᵃTypeO29:NM, CDC EDL 1282ᵃ691,380
Campylobacter jejuni33560CIP 702751,500
43432Type O:4, MK7751,500
35920BG 22751,500
43459TypeO:40, MPD570102751,500
29428VPI H840751,500
33252C3692751,500
33291ᵃAS-83-79ᵃ751,500
700819NCTC 11168751,500
BAA-1062RM 1221751,500

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 14 of 30

Page 19

Table 5. Inclusivity/Reactivity Summary for the GI Bacterial Assay Analytes (continued)

OrganismATCC# or SourceStrain/serovar/serotype/antigenic propertiesTest Concentration (3X LoD) (CFU/mL)
Aptima Multitest TubePreserved Stool
Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuniBAA-1234RM3193751,500
33292AS-84-79751,500
35918BG 177751,500
43434Type O:6, C6751,500
43435TypeO:7, DPH-1751,500
43449TypeO:23, MK 198751,500
43503UA466751,500
43472TypeO:5, CFJ29751,500
43430Type O:2, CJC-25751,500
Campylobacter coli33559CIP 7080ᵃ48960
43488TypeO:56, RO 26848960
43485Type O:49, A161848960
43483TypeO:47, Ca 7248960
43484TypeO:48, Ca 7748960
43133BG71648960
43136BG19348960
43481TypeO:39, 80-10248960
43482TypeO:46, VanH1348960
49941LRA 069.05.8948960
BAA-372D570848960
43135BG19248960
43478TypeO:28, 76-GA248960
BAA-1061RM 222848960
Shigatoxigenic E.coli (O157)35150O157:H7 (stx1/stx2), EDL 931ᵃ601,200
700377O157:NM (stx2), CDC 92-3099601,200
700927O157:H7:K- (stx1/stx2), EDL 933601,200
35150ᵃO157:H7 (stx1/stx2), EDL 931601,200
43894O157:H7 (stx1/stx2), CDC EDL 932601,200
700378O157:NM (stx1/stx2), CDC 92-3073601,200
43890O157:H7 (stx1) CDC C984601,200
43895O157:H7 (stx1/stx2), CDC EDL 933601,200

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 15 of 30

Page 20

Table 5. Inclusivity/Reactivity Summary for the GI Bacterial Assay Analytes (continued)

OrganismATCC# or SourceStrain/serovar/serotype/antigenic propertiesTest Concentration (3X LoD) (CFU/mL)
Aptima Multitest TubePreserved Stool
Shigatoxigenic E.coli51435O91:H21 (stx2), B2F13186,360
700840O111:H8 (stx1/stx2), B99BE0011613186,360
51434O91:H21 (stx2), H414-36/893186,360
BAA-181O111:H8 (stx1/stx2), CDC 1999-32493186,360
BAA-180O111:H8 (stx1), CDC 1999-33023186,360
BAA-176O113:H21 (stx2), CDC 2001-30043186,360
BAA-177O113:H21 (stx1/stx2), CDC 2000-31593186,360
BAA-182O104:H21 (stx2), CDC 1994-30233186,360
BAA-1653ᵃO26:H11 (stx1/stx2), EH1534ᵃ3186,360
BAA-2193O45:H2 (stx1), 2000-30393186,360
BAA-2210O103:H2 (stx1), 2003-31123186,360
BAA-2211O145:H25 (stx2), 2003-33753186,360
BAA-2219O121:H19 (stx2), 2002-32113186,360
BAA-2222O145:Nonmotile (stx1/stx2), 2006-31423186,360
BAA-2326O104:H4 (stx2), TY-24823186,360
BAA-2196O26:H11 (stx1/stx2), 2003--30143186,360
BAA-2215O103:H11 (stx1), 2006-30083186,360
BAA-2213O103:H25 (stx1), 2005-35463186,360
BAA-178O104:H21(stx2), CDC 1994-30243186,360
BAA-184O111:H8 (stx1), CDC 2000-30253186,360
BAA-2217O146 (stx2), 10C-31143186,360
BAA-179O111:H8 (stx1/stx2), CDC 1997-32153186,360
BAA-2129O145:H28 (stx2), TW078653186,360
BAA-1652O145:H48 (stx2), EH15333186,360
BAA-2192O145:Nonmotile (stx1/stx2), 99-33113186,360

CFU = colony forming units. ᵃ Strains used to establish LoD.

Inclusivity/Reactivity - In silico Analysis

The inclusivity of the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay was evaluated using in silico inclusivity analysis for each analyte. In silico analysis was performed using analyte sequences available in NCBI database and whole genome shotgun sequence database. For each analyte, corresponding oligonucleotide sequences (primers and probes) were evaluated against the


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 16 of 30

Page 21

database sequences. Any sequences with insufficient lengths (not covering the entire amplicon region) were excluded from the analysis.

Based on in silico analysis of all sequences available up to May 30, 2023 in the databases, the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay is predicted to detect 100% of 121 Salmonella bongori, 99.03% of 2,365 Salmonella enterica, 96.43% of 392 Campylobacter jejuni, 99.09% of 1,104 Campylobacter coli, 100% of 1,080 Shigella sonnei, 100% of 1,164 Shigella flexneri, 100% of 192 Shigella dysenteriae, 100% of 364 Shigella boydii, 98.71% of 387 STEC-expressing stx1 and 97.35% of 1,019 STEC-expressing stx2 sequences evaluated.

Analytical Specificity: Cross Reactivity and Microbial Interference - Wet Testing

Analytical specificity (cross-reactivity) and microbial interference for the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay were evaluated in the presence of non-targeted microorganisms that are either phylogenetically related to the assay analytes or potentially found in clinical specimens. Panels consisting of 100 bacteria, viruses, parasites and yeast listed in Table 6 were tested in processed negative CBS matrix in the absence and in the presence of GI Bacterial Assay analytes at 3X LoD. Except where noted, bacteria, yeast and parasites were evaluated at 10⁶ CFU/mL or 10⁶ rRNA copies/mL or 10⁶ cells/mL; viruses were evaluated at 10⁵ TCID50/mL.

No cross-reactivity or microbial interference was observed with any of the 100 organisms tested on the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay at indicated concentrations.

Table 6. Microorganisms Tested for Cross-Reactivity and Microbial Interference

MicroorganismTest ConcentrationMicroorganismTest Concentration
Arcobacter cryaerophilus10⁶ CFU/mLCronobacter sakazakii10⁶ CFU/mL
Neisseria gonorrhoeae10⁶ CFU/mLEdwardsiella tarda10⁶ CFU/mL
Streptococcus pyogenes10⁶ CFU/mLEgglerthella lenta10⁶ rRNA copies /mL
Trabulsiella guamensis10⁶ CFU/mLEntercoccus faecalis10⁶ CFU/mL
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii10⁶ rRNA copies /mLEnterobacter aerogenes10⁶ CFU/mL
Escherichia coli (non-shigatoxigenic)10⁶ CFU/mLEnterobacter cloacae10⁶ CFU/mL
Escherichia coli (non-shigatoxigenic O157)10⁶ CFU/mLEscherichia fergusonii10⁶ CFU/mL
Giardia lamblia BG-Aᵃ10⁶ copies/mLEscherichia hermanii10⁶ CFU/mL
Cyclosporaᵃ10⁶ copies/mLEscherichia vulneris10⁶ CFU/mL

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 17 of 30

Page 22

MicroorganismTest ConcentrationMicroorganismTest Concentration
Cryptosporidiumᵃ10⁶ copies/mLGardnerella vaginalis10⁶ CFU/mL
Norovirus (Noro GII)ᵃ10⁵ copies/mLHelicobacter pylori10⁶ CFU/mL
Astrovirусᵃ10⁵ copies/mLKlebsiella oxytoca10⁶ CFU/mL
Sapovirus (GII)ᵃ10⁵ copies/mLKlebsiella ozaenae10⁶ CFU/mL
Enterovirus (Ent V)ᵃ10⁵ copies/mLKlebsiella pneumoniae10⁶ CFU/mL
Rhinovirусᵃ10⁵ copies/mLLactobacillus acidophilus10⁶ CFU/mL
Coronavirus 229E10⁵ TCID50/mLLactobacillus crispatus10⁶ CFU/mL
Coxsakeivirus Type B410⁵ TCID50/mLLactococcus lactis10⁶ CFU/mL
Adenovirus Type 7A10⁵ TCID50/mLListeria grayi10⁶ CFU/mL
Rotavirусᵃ10⁵ copies/mLListeria monocytogenes10⁶ CFU/mL
Anaerococcus tetradius10⁶ CFU/mLMorganella morganii10⁶ CFU/mL
Yersinia enterecolitica10⁶ CFU/mLPeptostreptococcus anaerobius10⁶ CFU/mL
Vibrio parahaemolyticus10⁶ CFU/mLPeptostreptococcus micros10⁶ rRNA copies /mL
Abiotrophia defectivia10⁶ CFU/mLPhotobacterium damselae10⁶ CFU/mL
Acinetobacter baumannii10⁶ CFU/mLPlesiomonas shigelloides10⁶ CFU/mL

Table 6. Microorganisms Tested for Cross-Reactivity and Microbial Interference (continued)

MicroorganismTest ConcentrationMicroorganismTest Concentration
Acinetobacter lwoffii10⁶ CFU/mLPrevotella bivia10⁶ CFU/mL
Aeromonas hydrophila10⁶ CFU/mLPrevotella melaninogenica10⁶ CFU/mL
Alcaligenes faecalis10⁶ CFU/mLProteus mirabilis10⁶ rRNA copies/mL
Campylobacter upsaliensis10⁶ CFU/mLProteus penneri10⁶ CFU/mL
Anaerococcus vaginalis10⁶ CFU/mLProteus vulgaris10⁶ CFU/mL
Arcobacter butzleri10⁶ CFU/mLProvidencia alcalifaciens10⁶ CFU/mL
Bacillus cereus10⁶ CFU/mLProvidencia rettgeri10⁶ CFU/mL
Bacteriodes fragilis10⁶ CFU/mLProvidencia stuartii10⁶ CFU/mL
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron10⁶ CFU/mLPseudomonas aeruginosa10⁶ CFU/mL
Bacteroides vulgatus10⁶ CFU/mLPseudomonas fluorescens10⁶ CFU/mL
Bifidobacterium adolescentis10⁶ CFU/mLSerratia liquefaciens10⁶ CFU/mL
Bifidobacterium longum10⁶ rRNA copies /mLSerratia marcescens10⁶ CFU/mL
Campylobacter fetus10⁶ CFU/mLStaphylococcus aureus10⁶ CFU/mL
Campylobacter hyointestinalis10⁶ CFU/mLStaphylococcus epidermidis10⁶ CFU/mL
Campylobacter rectus10⁶ CFU/mLStenotrophomonas maltophilia10⁶ CFU/mL
Campylobacter sputorum10⁶ CFU/mLStreptococcus anginosus10⁶ CFU/mL
Candida albicans10⁶ CFU/mLStreptococcus dysgalactiae10⁶ CFU/mL
Citrobacter freundii10⁶ CFU/mLYersinia bercovieri10⁶ CFU/mL
Citrobacter koseri10⁶ CFU/mLYersinia pseudotuberculosis10⁶ CFU/mL
Clostridium difficile10⁶ CFU/mLYersinia rohdei10⁶ CFU/mL
Clostridium perfringens10⁶ CFU/mLCampylobacter lari10⁶ CFU/mL

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 18 of 30

Page 23

MicroorganismTest ConcentrationMicroorganismTest Concentration
Clostridium ramosum10⁶ CFU/mLEntamoeba histolytica10⁴ cells/mL
Clostridium sordellii10⁶ CFU/mLMegasphaeara elsdenii10⁶ CFU/mL
Clostridium tertiumb10⁶ CFU/mLChlamydia trachomatis10⁵ IFU/mL
Collinsella aerofaciens10⁶ CFU/mLLeptotrichia buccalis10⁶ CFU/mL
Corynebacterium genitalium10⁶ CFU/mLCytomegalovirus10⁵ TCID50/mL

CFU = colony forming units, IFU = inclusion forming units, rRNA copies = ribosomal ribonucleic acid copies, TCID50 = median tissue culture infectious dose.

ᵃ In vitro transcripts were used to evaluate cross-reactivity and microbial interference as cultured virus or whole genome purified nucleic acid are not readily available.

b In the interference testing, a 100% positivity was observed for Salmonella, Shigella and STEC at 1E6 CFU/mL and 100% positivity was recovered for Campylobacter at ≤ 1E4 CFU/mL.

Coinfection/Competitive Interference

Competitive interference in the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay was evaluated in triplicate using pairs of assay analytes at low/high concentrations in processed negative CBS matrix. The low concentration analyte was tested at 3X LoD against a high concentration analyte at 10⁶ CFU/mL. Additionally, analytes were also tested in the absence of a second analyte. When analytes were tested at high concentration, all results for other analytes maintained expected positivity; no competitive interference was observed. Table 7 shows a summary of results observed in the competitive interference testing.

Table 7. Summary of Coinfection Results

Analyte 1Analyte 2Salmonella % PosCampylobacter % PosShigella % PosSTEC % Pos
Name3X LoD (CFU/mL)ᵃNameHigh Conc (CFU/mL)ᵃ
NegativeN/ANegativeN/A0%0%0%0%
None0100%0%0%0%
Salmonella327Campylobacter10⁶100%100%0%0%
Shigella10⁶100%0%100%0%
STEC10⁶100%0%0%100%
None00%100%0%0%
Salmonella10⁶100%100%0%0%
Campylobacter75Shigella10⁶0%100%100%0%

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 19 of 30

Page 24

Analyte 1Analyte 2Salmonella % PosCampylobacter % PosShigella % PosSTEC % Pos
STEC10⁶0%100%0%100%
None00%0%100%0%
Salmonella10⁶100%0%100%0%
Shigella204Campylobacter10⁶0%100%100%0%
STEC10⁶0%0%100%100%
None00%0%0%100%
Salmonella10⁶100%0%0%100%
STEC318Campylobacter10⁶0%100%0%100%
Shigella10⁶0%0%100%100%
Salmonella10⁶100%0%0%0%
None0Campylobacter10⁶0%100%0%0%
Shigella10⁶0%0%100%0%
STEC10⁶0%0%0%100%

CFU = colony forming units, Pos = positive. ᵃ Analyte concentration in Aptima Multitest tube.

Interference

Potential inhibitory effects of endogenous and exogenous substances that may be present in a specimen were evaluated in the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay. Clinically relevant concentrations of potentially interfering substances were added to processed negative CBS matrix and tested in the absence and in the presence of GI Bacterial Assay analytes at 3X LoD. Tests were performed in triplicate. The substances and test concentrations are shown in Table 8. No impact on the performance of the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay was observed for any of the substances at the concentrations tested.


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 20 of 30

Page 25

Table 8. Substances Tested for Interference

Substance TypeGeneric NameActive Ingredient(s)Test Concentrationᵃ ᵇ ᶜ
AntibioticsAmoxicillinAmoxicillin0.7 μg/mL
AmpicillinAmpicillin0.9 μg/mL
DoxycyclineDoxycycline0.2 μg/mL
MetronidazoleMetronidazole1.5 μg/mL
Neosporin®Polymyxin B sulfate, bacitracin zinc, neomycin sulfate1.3% w/v
Anti-microbial and anti-fungalBZK Antiseptic TowelettesBenzalkonium chloride1.3% v/v
NystatinNystatin1.3% v/v
Dulcolax® suppositoryBisacodyl75 ng/mL
Colace®Docusate sodium3.0 μg/mL
Fleet® mineral oil enemaMineral oil1.3% v/v
Laxatives and stool softenersEx-Lax®Sennosides0.8 μg/mL
Miralax®Polyethylene glycol 33500.1 mg/mL
Milk of MagnesiaMagnesium hydroxide, Aluminum hydroxide1.3% v/v
Visicol®Sodium phosphate53 ng/mL
Anti-diarrhealImodium®Loperamide hydrochloride0.1 μg/mL
Anti-ItchVagisil®Benzocaine1.3% w/v
Preparation H®Hydrocortisone1.3% w/v
Phenylephrine hydrochloride (for hemorrhoids)Phenylephrine hydrochloride0.4 ng/mL
Anti-inflammatoryMesalazine (Rx only, for Crohns disease/ ulcerative colitis)Salicylic acid0.4 μg/mL
Aleve®Naproxen sodium4.5 μg/mL
AntacidPepto-Bismol®Bismuth subsalicylate1.3% v/v
Tums®Calcium carbonate55 μg/mL
Radiopaque contrast materialBarium SulfateBarium sulfate0.1 mg/mL
Lubricants and skin protectantsK-Y® Personal Lubricant Jelly GlycerinGlycerin1.3% w/v
Vaseline® Original 100% Pure Petroleum Jelly WhitePetrolatum1.3% w/v
Desitin®Zinc oxide1.3% w/v
SpermicideOptions Conceptrol®Vaginal Contraceptive GelNonoxynol-91.3% w/v

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 21 of 30

Page 26

Substance TypeGeneric NameActive Ingredient(s)Test Concentrationᵃ ᵇ ᶜ
EndogenousCholesterolCholesterol50 μg/mL
Fatty acidsPalmitic acid16 μg/mL
Fatty acidsStearic acid34 μg/mL
Triglycerides, total (Fecal fat, Intralipid)Triglycerides1.3% v/v
Human BileBilirubin, conjugated5.0 μg/mL
UrineHuman urine1.3% v/v
Human Whole BloodBlood/hemoglobin1.3% v/v
MucinPurified mucin protein0.05% w/v

ᵃ Analyte concentration in Aptima Multitest tube.
ᵇ v/v = volume by volume.
ᶜ w/v = weight by volume.

Stool specimens prepared in various preservative media were evaluated for potential impact on the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay performance. The preservative evaluated include 10 different types of Cary-Blair transport media from different vendors and preservative media containing fixatives shown in Table 9. All media were tested with Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay analytes at 3X LoD. Comparable performance was seen with all Cary-Blair media. Comparable interference was observed when specimens were processed in media containing fixative.

Table 9. Stool Preservative Media Tested for Interference

Cary-Blair Media

Media Type
Culture & Sensitivity (C&S) Medium
Cary Blair Transport Medium w/ Indicator
Para-Pak® C&S
Para-Pak® Enteric Plus
Cardinal Health™ C&S Stool Transport Vial
Protocol Cary Blair Medium
Enteric Transport Media (ETM®)
Puritan® Cary-Blair Medium 2mL
Puritan® Cary-Blair Medium 5mL
Copan® FecalSwab® Collection, Transport and Preservation System

Fixative media (interference was observed)

Media Type
Fisher® 10% Buffered Formalin
Para-Pak® 10% Buffered Formalin
Para-Pak® LV-PVA

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 22 of 30

Page 27

Carryover Contamination

The carryover contamination rate of the assay was evaluated using a checkerboard design with negative and positive panels made in processed negative CBS matrix. A total of 270 negatives interspersed with 270 positives samples (spiked with Salmonella at 10⁶ CFU/mL or 9,714 X LoD) were tested across 5 runs on 2 Panther Fusion Instruments. The Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay demonstrated a 0% carryover rate.

Within Laboratory Precision/Repeatability

Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay within laboratory precision was evaluated with a 3-member panel consisting of assay analytes in processed negative CBS matrix. The 3-member panel included 1 negative and 2 multi-analyte (with Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shigella, and STEC) panel members. The panels were tested by 3 operators on 2 runs per day, using 3 reagent lots on 3 Panther Fusion systems over 9 days.

The panel members are described in Table 10, along with a summary of the agreement with the expected results, mean Ct, variability analysis between reagent lots, operators, instruments, days, between and within runs and overall (total).


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 23 of 30

Page 28

Table 10. Ct Variability Analysis Summary

PanelDescriptionAnalyteAgreement %ᵃMean CtBetween LotsBetween InstrumentsBetween OperatorsBetween DaysBetween RunsWithin RunTotal
SDCV (%)SDCV (%)SDCV (%)SD
1Low Pos (1.5X LoD)Salmonella162/162100360.120.330.000.000.070.19
Campylobacter162/16210035.10.060.170.040.110.040.12
Shigella162/16210036.40.000.000.230.620.000.00
STEC162/16210034.30.070.20.000.000.000.00
2Negative (Internal Control)Negative162/162100280.040.150.331.160.000.00
Salmonella162/16210035.10.220.620.000.000.000.00
3Mod Pos (3X LoD)Campylobacter162/16210034.30.080.240.040.11<0.01<0.01
Shigella162/16210035.40.120.340.000.000.000.00
STEC162/16210033.30.080.240.000.000.000.00

Ct = cycle threshold, CV = coefficient of variation, Mod = Moderate, N = sample size, Pos = positive, SD = standard deviation.
ᵃ Agreement to expected panel positivity result.

Reproducibility

Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay reproducibility was evaluated at 3 US sites using 1 negative panel member and 2 panel members positive for all 4 targets. Testing was performed for 5 days by 6 operators (2 at each site) using 1 lot of assay reagents. Each run included 3 replicates of each panel member.

A negative panel member was created using a matrix comprised of stool specimens negative for all assay targets preserved in Cary-Blair media processed into STM. Positive panel members were created by spiking 1.5X LoD (low positive) or 3X LoD (moderate positive) concentrations of the target analytes into the negative matrix.

The agreement with expected results was 100% for all panel members components for Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shigella, and STEC (Table 11).


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 24 of 30

Page 29

Table 11. Agreement of Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay Results with Expected Results

Agreement with Expected Results

DescriptionAnalyteN% (95% CI)
NegInternal Control90/90100 (95.9-100)
Low PosᵃSalmonellaᶜ90/90100 (95.9-100)
Campylobacterᶜ90/90100 (95.9-100)
Shigella/EIECᶜ90/90100 (95.9-100)
STECᶜ90/90100 (95.9-100)
Mod PosᵇSalmonellaᶜ90/90100 (95.9-100)
Campylobacterᶜ90/90100 (95.9-100)
Shigella/EIECᶜ90/90100 (95.9-100)
STECᶜ90/90100 (95.9-100)

CI = score confidence interval, Mod = moderate, N = sample size, Neg = negative, Pos = positive.
ᵃ Low Pos = All targets are 1.5X LoD.
ᵇ Mod Pos = All targets are 3X LoD.
ᶜ Salmonella bongori, Campylobacter jejuni, Shigella sonnei, and STEC serotype O26 were used to build the positive panels.

Signal variability was measured as %CV of the Ct values. The total signal variability was ≤2.03% (SD ≤0.74) for all panel components (Table 12). For the sources of variation except the 'withinrun' factor, %CV values were ≤1.00% for all panel components. The signal variability was ≤0.77% (SD ≤0.25) for the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay positive controls (Table 13).


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 25 of 30

Page 30

Table 12. Signal Variability of the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay by Target and Concentration

DescriptionAnalyteNMean CtBetween SiteBetween Operator/RunᶜBetween DayWithin RunTotal
SDCV (%)SDCV (%)SD
Low PosᵃSalmonella9036.40.000.000.361.000.12
Campylobacter9035.10.160.450.050.140.09
Shigella/EIEC9036.30.080.220.030.080.00
STEC9034.30.000.000.060.180.04
Mod PosᵇSalmonella9035.20.160.470.000.000.14
Campylobacter9034.20.150.430.040.130.11
Shigella/EIEC9035.20.190.550.100.300.09
STEC9033.30.080.230.000.000.07

Ct = cycle threshold, CV = coefficient of variation, Mod = moderate, N = sample size, Pos = positive, SD = standard deviation.
Note: The analysis was performed using the SAS MIXED procedure, which applies a lower boundary of 0 to all variance components in the model by default. If a variance component is 0, SD and %CV are displayed as 0.00.
ᵃ Low Pos = All targets are 1.5X LoD.
ᵇ Mod Pos = All targets are 3X LoD.
ᶜ Between Operator may be confounded with Between Run, therefore, Between Operator and Between Run estimates are combined in Between Operator/Run.

Table 13. Signal Variability of the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay Positive Controls

ControlAnalyteNMean CtBetween SiteBetween OperatorBetween DayWithin DayTotal
SDCV (%)SDCV (%)SD
PosSalmonella3030.50.120.400.000.000.11
Campylobacter3031.40.040.130.040.130.09
Shigella/EIEC3031.90.160.500.000.000.13
STEC3031.80.000.000.010.040.11

Ct = cycle threshold, CV = coefficient of variation, N = sample size, Pos = positive, SD = standard deviation.
Note: The analysis was performed using the SAS MIXED procedure, which applies a lower boundary of 0 to all variance components in the model by default. If a variance component is 0, SD and %CV are displayed as 0.00.


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 26 of 30

Page 31

Brief Description of Clinical Studies

A multicenter study was conducted using remnant stool specimens in Cary-Blair preservative medium collected as part of routine patient care at 8 US clinics from pediatric or adult patients suspected of acute gastroenteritis. All specimens were tested with the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay and with a comparator FDA-cleared Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT). An alternate FDA-cleared NAAT was used for discordant resolution testing, if applicable.

Positive (PPA) and negative (NPA) percent agreement, with corresponding 2-sided 95% Score CIs, were calculated relative to comparator results, by target and by specimen category.

A total of 1548 prospective specimens and 261 retrospective specimens were enrolled in the study; 69 specimens were excluded from the performance analyses (eg, duplicate individuals, invalid Panther Fusion or comparator results for all targets). An additional 126 contrived specimens were assessed to supplement the prospective and retrospective data for the target stx1/stx2. Of the 1896 specimens tested in valid Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay runs, 41 (2.2%) had initial invalid results. Upon retest, 33 of the 41 specimens yielded valid results, for a total of 1888 (99.6%) specimens with final valid results. The final data set consisted of 1866 evaluable specimens; not all were evaluable for all analytes. Demographic information for the 1740 evaluable (1521 prospective and 219 retrospective specimens) is provided in Table 14.

Table 14. Summary of Subject Demographics

Total N (%)Prospective N (%)Retrospective N (%)
Total Specimens17401521219
Sex
Female909 (52.2)794 (52.2)115 (52.5)
Male831 (47.8)727 (47.8)104 (47.5)
Age Group
0 to 28 days7 (0.4)7 (0.5)0 (0)
29 days to <2 years70 (4.0)67 (4.4)3 (1.4)
2 to 5 years53 (3.0)50 (3.3)3 (1.4)
6 to 11 years73 (4.2)66 (4.3)7 (3.2)
12 to 17 years73 (4.2)71 (4.7)2 (0.9)
18 to 21 years53 (3.0)45 (3.0)8 (3.7)
22 to 64 years849 (48.8)723 (47.5)126 (57.5)
≥65 years562 (32.3)492 (32.3)70 (32.0)

N = population size


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 27 of 30

Page 32

Performance characteristics for detection of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shigella/EIEC, and stx1/stx2 are shown in Table 15 through Table 18.

Table 15. Clinical Performance - Salmonella spp.

Specimen OriginNTPFPTNFNPrevalenceᵃ (%)PPA % (95% CI)ᵇNPA % (95% CI)ᵇ
Prospective (Fresh)1520332ᶜ14841ᵈ2.297.1 (85.1, 99.5)99.9 (99.5, 100)
Retrospective (Frozen)219202ᵉ1970N/Aᶠ100 (83.9, 100)99.0 (96.4, 99.7)

CI = confidence interval, FN = false negative, FP = false positive, N = sample size, NPA = negative percent agreement, PPA = positive percent agreement, TN = true negative, TP = true positive.
ᵃ Study prevalence reported based on comparator testing.
ᵇ Score CI.
ᶜ The 2 discordant false positive prospective specimens were positive for Salmonella by the alternate NAAT.
ᵈ The discordant false negative prospective specimen was negative for Salmonella by the alternate NAAT.
ᵉ The 2 discordant retrospective false positive specimens were positive for Salmonella by the alternate NAAT.
ᶠ Calculation of prevalence is not applicable.

Table 16. Clinical Performance - Campylobacter spp.

Specimen OriginNTPFPTNFNPrevalenceᵃ (%)PPA % (95% CI)ᵇNPA % (95% CI)ᵇ
Prospective (Fresh)1520392ᶜ14781ᵈ2.697.5 (87.1, 99.6)99.9 (99.5, 100)
Retrospective (Frozen)219184ᵉ1970N/Aᶠ100 (82.4, 100)99.0 (95.0, 99.2)

CI = confidence interval, FN = false negative, FP = false positive, N = sample size, NPA = negative percent agreement, PPA = positive percent agreement, TN = true negative, TP = true positive.
ᵃ Study prevalence reported based on comparator testing.
ᵇ Score CI.
ᶜ The 2 discordant false positive prospective specimens were negative for Campylobacter by the alternate NAAT.
ᵈ The discordant false negative prospective specimen was negative for Campylobacter by the alternate NAAT.
ᵉ 3 of 4 discordant false positive retrospective specimens were positive for Campylobacter by the alternate NAAT.
ᶠ Calculation of prevalence is not applicable.


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 28 of 30

Page 33

Table 17. Clinical Performance - Shigella/EIEC

Specimen OriginNTPFPTNFNPrevalenceᵃ (%)PPA % (95% CI)ᵇNPA % (95% CI)ᵇ
Prospective (Fresh)1521270149401.8100 (87.5, 100)100 (99.7, 100)
Retrospective (Frozen)219191ᶜ1990N/Aᵈ100 (83.2, 100)99.5 (97.2, 99.9)

CI = confidence interval, FN = false negative, FP = false positive, N = sample size, NPA = negative percent agreement, PPA = positive percent agreement, TN = true negative, TP = true positive.
ᵃ Study prevalence reported based on comparator testing.
ᵇ Score CI.
ᶜ The discordant false positive retrospective specimen was positive for Shigella/EIEC by the alternate NAAT.
ᵈ Calculation of prevalence is not applicable.

Table 18. Clinical Performance - Shiga Toxins 1 and 2 (stx1/stx2)

Specimen OriginNTPFPTNFNPrevalenceᵃ (%)PPA % (95% CI)ᵇNPA % (95% CI)ᵇ
Prospective (Fresh)152075ᶜ150800.5100 (64.6, 100)99.7 (99.2, 99.9)
Retrospective (Frozen)219398ᵈ1720N/Aᵉ100 (91.0, 100)95.6 (91.5, 97.7)
Contrived (Frozen)126630630N/Aᵉ100 (94.3, 100)100 (94.3, 100)

CI = confidence interval, FN = false negative, FP = false positive, N = sample size, NPA = negative percent agreement, PPA = positive percent agreement, TN = true negative, TP = true positive.
ᵃ Study prevalence reported based on comparator testing.
ᵇ Score CI.
ᶜ The 5 discordant false positive prospective specimens were positive for stx1/stx2 by the alternate NAAT.
ᵈ The 8 discordant false positive retrospective specimens was positive for stx1/stx2 by the alternate NAAT.
ᵉ Calculation of prevalence is not applicable.

The 14 coinfections detected by the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay are described in Table 19. Nine (9) coinfections were also detected by the comparator NAAT.

Table 19. Coinfections Detected in Prospective and Retrospective Specimens

CoinfectionsDetected by Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay (n)Confirmed by Comparator (n)
Salmonella, Campylobacter10
Salmonella, Shigella/EIEC10
Salmonella, stx1/stx210
Campylobacter, Shigella/EIEC54
Campylobacter, stx1/stx254
Shigella/EIEC, stx1/stx211

510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 29 of 30

Page 34

VIII. CONCLUSIONS

The analytical and clinical study results demonstrate that the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay on the Panther Fusion system performs comparably to the predicate device that is currently marketed for the same intended use. Hardware and software verification and validation demonstrate that the Panther Fusion GI Bacterial Assay on the Panther Fusion system will perform as intended.


510(k) Summary
Original 510(k) Application Confidential
Page 30 of 30

§ 866.3990 Gastrointestinal microorganism multiplex nucleic acid-based assay.

(a)
Identification. A gastrointestinal microorganism multiplex nucleic acid-based assay is a qualitativein vitro diagnostic device intended to simultaneously detect and identify multiple gastrointestinal microbial nucleic acids extracted from human stool specimens. The device detects specific nucleic acid sequences for organism identification as well as for determining the presence of toxin genes. The detection and identification of a specific gastrointestinal microbial nucleic acid from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of gastrointestinal infection aids in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal infection when used in conjunction with clinical evaluation and other laboratory findings. A gastrointestinal microorganism multiplex nucleic acid-based assay also aids in the detection and identification of acute gastroenteritis in the context of outbreaks.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls are set forth in FDA's guideline document entitled: “Class II Special Controls Guideline: Gastrointestinal Microorganism Multiplex Nucleic Acid-Based Assays for Detection and Identification of Microorganisms and Toxin Genes from Human Stool Specimens.” For availability of the guideline document, see § 866.1(e).