(42 days)
The Stryker iVAS® Bone Biopsy Kit can be used as a biopsy tool to remove sample tissue from bone or vertebral body using a coring, cutting or aspiration technique.
The Stryker iVAS® Bone Biopsy Kit can be used as a biopsy tool to remove sample tissue from bone or vertebral body using a coring, cutting or aspiration technique. The subject device is disposable, intended for single use, and is provided sterile to the end user. The mechanism of action for obtaining a biopsy is manual and the principle of operation is through suction. The biopsy device will be sold in a kit configuration consisting of a coaxial biopsy needle, obturator and syringe. The subject biopsy kit is used with an access cannula and stylet of compatible size. The access cannula and stylet are sold separately and are Class I exempt per 21 CFR 888.4200, product code OAR (injector, vertebroplasty (does not contain cement).
The provided text describes the Stryker iVAS® Bone Biopsy Kit and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device, focusing on non-clinical (bench) testing. There is no information about a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria in the context of AI/ML performance, multi-reader multi-case studies, or human-in-the-loop performance.
The document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device and is primarily concerned with establishing substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than assessing an AI's performance.
Here's the information extracted from the provided text, keeping in mind that the request is geared towards AI/ML device studies, and this document does not describe such a study:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document mentions acceptance criteria but does not provide a table specifying the criteria values alongside reported performance for each test. It broadly states that "All samples surpassed all acceptance criteria" for each test.
| Test Description | Acceptance Criteria (Not specified, but implied) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Axial Torque and Non-axial Torque | Torsional performance requirements | All samples surpassed all acceptance criteria |
| Compressive force (obturator) | Compression requirements | All samples surpassed all acceptance criteria |
| Axial Tensile Force | Functional performance requirements | All samples surpassed all acceptance criteria |
| Compressive Force and Axial Tensile Force (obturator) | Functional and compressive performance requirements | All samples surpassed all acceptance criteria |
| Impact and Axial Compressive testing | Impact and compressive performance requirements | All samples surpassed all acceptance criteria |
| Impact testing | Functional specifications | All samples surpassed all acceptance criteria |
2. Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance
The document states "All samples" passed the tests, but does not specify the exact number of samples (sample size) used for each bench test.
Data Provenance: Not applicable in the context of "country of origin of the data" or "retrospective or prospective" as these were bench tests performed on physical device samples, not clinical or historical data.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
Not applicable. The tests are mechanical bench tests on the device's physical properties. There is no ground truth established by experts in the context of interpretation or diagnosis for these types of tests.
4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. Adjudication methods are typically relevant for human interpretation of data, such as medical images. These were objective mechanical tests.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was mentioned or performed. This document does not pertain to AI/ML software.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
No standalone algorithm performance study was mentioned or performed. This document does not pertain to AI/ML software.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
Not applicable. For the bench tests, the "ground truth" would be the engineering specifications and performance requirements that the device needed to meet.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This document describes a physical medical device, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. As noted above, this document does not pertain to AI/ML software, so there is no training set or ground truth in that context.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo in blue, with the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" stacked on top of the word "ADMINISTRATION".
October 5, 2017 Stryker Corporation Ms. Kristi Ashton Staff Regulatory Affairs Specialist 4100 E. Milham Avenue Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001
Re: K172558
Trade/Device Name: Stryker iVAS Bone Biopsy Kit . Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.1075 Regulation Name: Gastroenterology-Urology Biopsy Instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KNW Dated: August 23, 2017 Received: August 24, 2017
Dear Ms. Ashton:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce pror to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{1}------------------------------------------------
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely,
Jennifer R. Stevenson -S3
For Binita S. Ashar, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S. Director Division of Surgical Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name Stryker iVAS® Bone Biopsy Kit
Indications for Use (Desarbe) The Stryker iVAS® Bone Biopsy Kit can be used as a biopsy tool to remove sample tissue from bone or vertebral body using a coring, cutting or aspiration technique.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | ☑ |
|---|---|
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ☐ |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
K172558 510(k) Summary
1. Submitter
| a. 510(k) Owner: | Stryker Instruments4100 E. Milham AvenueKalamazoo, Michigan 49001USAPh: +1-269-323-7700Fax: +1-269-324-5412 |
|---|---|
| b. FDA EstablishmentRegistration Number: | 1811755 |
| c. Contact Person: | Kristi Ashton, BSN, RNStaff Regulatory Affairs SpecialistRegulatory AffairsInstruments DivisionStryker CorporationPh: +1-269-389-5929Fax: +1-269-389-5412Kristi.Ashton@Stryker.com |
| d. Date Submitted: | October 2, 2017 |
2. Subject Device Name
Trade Name: Stryker iVAS® Bone Biopsy Kit Common Name: Instrument, Biopsy Product Codes: KNW
{4}------------------------------------------------
K172558 Stryker iVAS® Bone Biopsy Kit
Regulation: 21CFR876.1075 3. Legally Marketed Predicate Device
Predicate Device: Coaxial Bone and Vertebral Body Biopsy Needle (K070091) Reference Device: Stryker iVAS® 8G Bone Biopsy Kit (K141673) 4. Device Description
The Stryker iVAS® Bone Biopsy Kit can be used as a biopsy tool to remove sample tissue from bone or vertebral body using a coring, cutting or aspiration technique. The subject device is disposable, intended for single use, and is provided sterile to the end user. The mechanism of action for obtaining a biopsy is manual and the principle of operation is through suction. The biopsy device will be sold in a kit configuration consisting of a coaxial biopsy needle, obturator and syringe. The subject biopsy kit is used with an access cannula and stylet of compatible size. The access cannula and stylet are sold separately and are Class I exempt per 21 CFR 888.4200, product code OAR (injector, vertebroplasty (does not contain cement).
5. Intended Use/Indications for use
The Stryker iVAS® Bone Biopsy Kit can be used as a biopsy tool to remove sample tissue from bone or vertebral body using a coring, cutting or aspiration technique.
6. Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device
Table 5-1 Comparison of Technological Characteristics
| Description | Stryker iVAS® Biopsy Kit(Subject) | Coaxial Bone and Vertebral BodyBiopsy Needle(K070091)(Predicate) |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | Class II | Class II |
| Product code | KNW, Instrument, Biopsy | KNW, Instrument, Biopsy |
| Description | Stryker iVAS® Biopsy Kit(Subject) | Coaxial Bone and Vertebral BodyBiopsy Needle(K070091)(Predicate) |
| Indications for use | The Stryker iVAS® Bone BiopsyKit can be used as a biopsy tool toremove sample tissue from boneor vertebral body using a coring,cutting or aspiration technique. | This device is intended for use bya physician performing a bone orvertebral body biopsy using acoring, cutting, or aspirationtechnique. |
| Intended use/targetpopulation | Used in patients in need of a boneor vertebral body tissuediagnostics | Used in patients in need of a boneor vertebral body tissuediagnostics |
| GaugeConfigurations | 8G,10G,11G | 10G, 11G, 13G |
| Biopsy needleDimensions | The differences in the dimensionsare nominal across the gaugesizes. | The differences in the dimensionsare nominal across the gauge sizes. |
| Biopsy Needle-Material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Biopsy NeedleHandle Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Biopsy needlesheath (safetyfeature) | Plastic | Plastic |
| Penetration depth | There are nominal differences inthe penetration depth of thesubject and predicate devices. | There are nominal differences inthe penetration depth of the subjectand predicate devices. |
| Jaw size | There are nominal differences inthe jaw size of the subject andpredicate devices. | There are nominal differences inthe jaw size of the subject andpredicate devices. |
| Brush Size (diameterand depth) | N/A | N/A |
| Obturator Material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Description | Stryker iVAS® Biopsy Kit(Subject) | Coaxial Bone and Vertebral BodyBiopsy Needle(K070091)(Predicate) |
| Obturator HandleMaterial | Plastic | Stainless Steel |
| Sterilization method | Gamma Irradiation, VDmax25 | Ethylene Oxide (Eo) |
| Sterilizationassurance level | 10-6 | 10-6 |
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
8. Non-Clinical
Biocompatibility:
The materials of construction for the Stryker iVAS ® Bone Biopsy Kit have not changed since the device was originally cleared via K032943 (10G, 11G) and K141673 (8G). Therefore, biocompatibility testing is not required.
Bench:
The following bench testing was conducted on the subject Stryker iVAS® Bone Biopsy Kit. The testing was conducted in a manner as similar as possible to how the biopsy device will be used by the healthcare professional.
Axial Torque and Non-axial Torque (11G) was performed to verify torsional performance of the subject device. All samples surpassed all acceptance criteria.
Compressive force testing was completed on the obturator (10G) to simulate compression during clinical use. All samples surpassed all acceptance criteria.
Axial Tensile Force (10G) was performed to verify the functional performance of the subject device at T=0. All samples surpassed all acceptance criteria.
Compressive Force and Axial Tensile Force was performed on the obturator (11G) to verify functional and compressive performance. All samples surpassed all acceptance criteria.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Impact and Axial Compressive testing was to verify the impact and compressive performance of the subject device. All samples surpassed all acceptance criteria.
Impact testing was performed on the subject device to confirm functional specifications. All samples surpassed all acceptance criteria.
The acceptance criteria for the predicate devices is similar to the acceptance criteria for the subject bone biopsy kit, demonstrating equivalence of the subject device to the predicate biopsy devices.
9. Clinical Testing
No clinical testing was deemed necessary for this 510(k).
10. Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
The Stryker iVAS ® Bone Biopsy Kit and predicate devices have the same fundamental scientific technology, principal of operation and mode of action.
The addition of bone to the intended use for the subject device does not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness. A review of recalls, Maude data, clinical literature, and a risk review was completed. There are no new or previously unidentified complications or additional harms associated with the use of biopsy needles when the indication is expanded to include bone.
Although there are a few differences in the technological characteristics of the subject and predicate devices, they are insignificant overall. The technological differences between the subject and predicate devices do not raise new types of safety and effectiveness questions. The performance testing completed proves that the subject device has the same performance characteristics as the predicate device.
Therefore it is proposed that the subject Stryker iVAS® Biopsy Kit is substantially equivalent to the predicate device (Coaxial Bone and Vertebral Body Biopsy Needle (K070091).
§ 876.1075 Gastroenterology-urology biopsy instrument.
(a)
Identification. A gastroenterology-urology biopsy instrument is a device used to remove, by cutting or aspiration, a specimen of tissue for microscopic examination. This generic type of device includes the biopsy punch, gastrointestinal mechanical biopsy instrument, suction biopsy instrument, gastro-urology biopsy needle and needle set, and nonelectric biopsy forceps. This section does not apply to biopsy instruments that have specialized uses in other medical specialty areas and that are covered by classification regulations in other parts of the device classification regulations.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (performance standards).(2) Class I for the biopsy forceps cover and the non-electric biopsy forceps. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.