(245 days)
This is a multipurpose system for in vitro diagnostic coagulation studies and capable of performing clotting, chromogenic, and immunoassays.
The COAG-A-MATE MTX III is a multipurpose system for in vitro diagnostic coagulation studies capable of performing clotting, chromogenic, and immunoassays. It uses a photo-optical detection principle with an LED based optical system. The measuring module consists of a measuring rotor and a photometer with two channels, each containing 2 LEDs (405 nm and 570 nm), 3 lenses, filters, and a photo-detector. A light beam passes through the cuvette and is received by the photo-detector. Changes in light transmittance are detected and converted into an electrical signal. The software controls the mechanical, fluidic, thermal, and optical functions to manipulate patient fluids, combine reagents with samples in a cuvette ring, track samples, integrate the relevant cuvette, and return results to be analyzed by the applicable assay algorithm. The software also provides an operator interface for managing patient information and test results.
The provided document outlines the acceptance criteria and study findings for the Coag-A-Mate MTX® III, a multipurpose system for in vitro coagulation studies.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Parameter/Study Type | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Precision | %CV less than 4% | Total precision for all assays had a %CV of less than 4%. |
| Method Comparison | Line of regression at a 95% confidence interval shows statistical identity between MTX II and MTX III. | Line of regression at a 95% confidence interval demonstrated statistical identity. |
| Interference Testing | High positive correlation coefficient (e.g., 0.88-0.99) for samples with interfering substances, demonstrating equivalence to predicate device. | High positive correlation coefficient range 0.88-0.99 was observed. Equivalent to Coag-A-Mate MTX II. |
| On-board Stability | Equivalent performance to the Coag-A-Mate MTX II. | Demonstrated equivalence to the Coag-A-Mate MTX II. |
Overall Conclusion: The studies consistently demonstrated that the overall performance of the Coag-A-Mate MTX III system is equivalent to that of the predicate Coag-A-Mate MTX II system.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Precision Study: Not explicitly stated, but performed according to NCCLS Document EP5-A.
- Method Comparison Experiment: Plasma from normal donors and clinically abnormal specimens were tested over twenty-two testing days. Each plasma sample was tested in duplicate. The total number of individual samples is not specified.
- Interference Testing: Clinical samples with noticeable levels of lipemia, bilirubin, or both were used. The exact number of samples is not specified.
- Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin. Given the submission to the FDA, it's likely conducted in the US or under US regulatory guidelines. The studies appear to be prospective for the purpose of validating the new device against its predicate.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
Not applicable. This device is an in-vitro diagnostic system that measures clotting times and other coagulation parameters directly. The "ground truth" for its performance is established through quantitative measurements and comparisons with a predicate device, as opposed to qualitative expert interpretation of images or other data. Therefore, expert consensus on test set ground truth is not relevant in this context.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable, as expert adjudication is not relevant for the performance evaluation of this in-vitro diagnostic device.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This is an in-vitro diagnostic device, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool that requires human reader interpretation. No MRMC study was conducted or is relevant here.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Yes, the studies described (precision, method comparison, interference testing, and on-board stability) assess the standalone performance of the Coag-A-Mate MTX III system. The device itself, described as having "identical analysis algorithm methodologies" to its predecessor, operates without human-in-the-loop performance for result generation.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth used for evaluating the Coag-A-Mate MTX III was primarily based on:
- Quantitative measurements: Direct coagulation times (in seconds for clotting assays) and extinction values (mE/sec for chromogenic assays).
- Comparison to a predicate device: The Coag-A-Mate MTX II system served as the established "truth" or reference standard, with the goal of demonstrating statistical equivalence.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This document describes the validation of an in-vitro diagnostic instrument, not the training of a machine learning algorithm. Therefore, there is no "training set" in the context of AI/ML. The device's underlying algorithms are based on established photo-optical detection principles and analysis methodologies rather than iterative learning from a data set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable, as there is no training set for an AI/ML algorithm in this context.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the date DEC 23 2005 on the left side. On the right side of the image, the word BIOMERIEUX is printed in a stylized font. There is a circular graphic above the letters 'IE' in BIOMERIEUX.
510(k) SUMMARY
Coag-A-Mate MTX® III
510(k) Submission Information:
KOS/O30
| Submitter's Name: | bioMérieux, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Address: | 100 RodolpheDurham, NC 27712 |
| Contact Person: | John CusackSr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
| Phone Number: | 919-620-2803 |
| Fax Number: | 919-620-2548 |
| Date of Preparation: | December 18, 2005 |
| B. Device Name: | |
| Formal/Trade Name: | Coag-A-Mate MTX® III |
| Classification Name: | 21 CFR 864.5425 Multipurpose System for In VitroCoagulation Studies |
| Common Name: | Coag-A-Mate MTX® III |
| C. Predicate Device: | Coag-A-Mate MTX® II (K962857), MDA®180 (K924453) |
D. 510(k) Summary:
Intended Use and Description
The COAG-A-MATE MTX III intended use is a multipurpose system for in vitro diagnostic coagulation studies and capable of performing clotting, chromogenic, and immunoassays within various populations.
The assays used with the Coag-A-Mate MTX III are generally used for as following: 1) Screening patients for Hemostasis abnormalities. 2) Pre-surgical screening. 3) Monitoring anticoagulant therapy with coumadin and or heparin. 4) Monitoring bleeding disorders such as Hemophilia or vWD. 5) Monitoring patients with DIC. 6) Monitoring and the evaluation of patients suspected of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is comprised of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).
Technical Logical Differences
The technological characteristics of the new device, the Coag-A-Mate MTX® III, are very similar
and in most cases they are identical to the Coag-A-Mate MTX® II. The shared t characteristics of the two systems include the following:
{1}------------------------------------------------
- Both systems are capable of performing coagulation and chromogenic assays. .
- Both systems use identical mechanical components, including: all pipetting, disposable . manipulation mechanisms, sample handling, liquid level sensing, temperature control, reagent stirring, optical alignments (including optical path, path length), optical detection components, sub-system connectivity (i.e. control cables, control methodologies),
- Both systems use the identical platform layouts and organization. .
- Both systems use identical analysis algorithm methodologies. .
The only difference is the use of an LED based optical system (as opposed to the previously used halogen lamp based optical system). The LED's provide a more reliable light source and the light provided is filtered so that (as in the previous system) only the appropriate wavelength reaches the cuvette.
Technical Logical Characteristics
The Coac-A-Mate MTX 11 and Coag-A-Mate MTX III use a photo-optical detection principle. In order to perform the specific assays, there are various reagents and controls that are manufactured to be compatible with the MTX III system. Clot based and chromogenic assays can be run simultaneously in random access. The measuring module consists of the measuring rotor and a photometer. The photometer contains two channels (i.e. two cuvettes can be optically integrated at a time) and each channel consists of 2 LEDs (one for each wavelength), 3 lenses, 405 nm and 570 nm filters, and a photo-detector.
A light beam passes through the cuvette and is received by the photo-detector. As soon as the starting reagent is added to the plasma, the measuring time starts. Any change in the light transmittance is detected and converted into an electrical signal by the photo-detector. When the assay has been completed, the raw data (in seconds for coagulation assays) and in mElsec (extinction) for chromogenic assays are processed and reported.
The MTX III software controls the mechanical, fluidic, thermal, and optical functions of the instrument so as to accurately manipulate patient fluids, combine the proper reagents with the patient sample in a cuvette ring (which serves as a reaction vessel as well), track patient samples throughout the assay process, integrated the relevant cuvette, and returns a result to the be analyzed by the applicable assay algorithm. The MTX III software also provides the operators with an interface with which the patient information and test results can be managed (on screen and through the LiS as required).
Conclusions from the Clinical Tests
Precision studies to characterize within run and total precision were performed according to guidelines provided in "Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices;" National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), Document EP5-A. The total precision for all assays had a %CV of less than 4%. The results of this experiment demonstrate the Coag-A-Mate MTX III system has comparable precision to that of the Coag-A-Mate MTX II system.
A method comparison experiment, as described in "Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples:" National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), Document EP9-A2, was performed to determine the relationship between results obtained using plasma from normal donors and clinically abnormal specimens for the Coag-A-Mate MTX III and Coag-A-Mate MTX II systems. Testing of samples extended over twenty-two testing days. Each plasma sample
{2}------------------------------------------------
was tested in duplicate. All plasma samples were treated identically with regard to storage and was tested in udplicate. All placina camparison study demonstrated that the line of regression at a If ecce that history. This mother of identity. The conclusion indicates that there is no statistical difference between the instrument platforms.
The Coag-A-Mate MTX III system demonstrated its ability to determine correct clotting times for rne Oog A Miato 11177 m Julet of interfering substances (lipemia and bilirubin) as described in "Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry;" National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), Document EP7-A. The clinical samples used in the interference comparison study had noticeable levels of lipemia, bilirubin, or both. The degree of interference substance present was reported as slight, moderate, or marked. When testing samples containing interfering substances the Coag-A-Mate systems showed a high positive correlation coefficient range 0.889the oudg A matte bytichle et the acceptance criteria listed in the requirements document for samples with interfering substances. Again, the data generated in this study demonstrated that the Sumploo with Interioring equivalent in performance to the Coag-A-Mate MTX II system when testing clinical samples with elevated levels of lipemia and/or bilirubin.
On board stability studies were conducted which also demonstrated that the Coag-A-Mate MTX III system is equivalent in performance to the Coag-A-Mate MTX II.
In conclusion, each of the studies conducted in this clinical trial demonstrated that the overall performance of the Coag-A-Mate MTX III system is equivalent to that of the predicate Coag-A-Mate MTX III system. The Premarket Notification 510(k) presents data in support of Coag-A-Mate MTX III System.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal features a stylized eagle with three lines forming its body and wings. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
bioMérieux, Inc. c/o Mr. John Cusack Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist 100 Rodolphe St. Durham, NC 27712
DEC 2 3 2005
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
Re: K051030
Trade/Device Name: Coag-A-Mate MTX® III System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 864.5425 Regulation Name: Multipurpose system for in vitro coagulation studies Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JPA Dated: April 18, 2005 Received: April 22, 2005
Dear Mr. Cusack:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 -
If you desire specific information about the application of labeling requirements to your device, or questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety at (240) 276-0484. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html
Sincerely yours,
lobatz Beckerh
Robert L. Becker, Jr., MD, P& Director Division of Immunology and Hematology Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
Kosto 30 510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: Coag-A-Mate MTX® III
Indications For Use:
This is a multipurpose system for in vitro diagnostic coagulation studies and capable of performing clotting, chromogenic, and immunoassays.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices (OIVD)
Page 1 of 1
Maria Chen for
Josephine Bautte, tr
Division Sign-Off
Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety
51000 K05/030
§ 864.5425 Multipurpose system for in vitro coagulation studies.
(a)
Identification. A multipurpose system for in vitro coagulation studies is a device consisting of one automated or semiautomated instrument and its associated reagents and controls. The system is used to perform a series of coagulation studies and coagulation factor assays.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). A control intended for use with a multipurpose system for in vitro coagulation studies is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 864.9.