Search Results
Found 912 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(28 days)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750
Secondary Product Code: JAK
Classification Name: System
The AnyScan 3.0 NM Scanner Family is intended for use by appropriately trained health care professionals to aid in detecting, localizing, diagnosing, staging and restaging of lesions, tumors, disease and organ function for the evaluation of diseases and disorders such as, but not limited to, cardiovascular disease, neurological disorders and cancer. The images produced by the system can also be used by the physician to aid in radiotherapy treatment planning or additional uses.
SPECT: The SPECT subsystem is intended to provide projection and cross-sectional images through computer reconstruction of the data, representing radioisotope distribution in the patient body or in a specific organ using planar and tomographic scanning modes for isotopes with energies up to 588 keV.
CT: CT component is intended to provide cross sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data providing anatomical information.
PET: The PET component is intended to provide cross- sectional images representing the distribution of tomographic scanning modes.
SPECT+CT: The SPECT and CT components used together acquire SPECT/CT images. The SPECT images can be corrected for attenuation with the CT images, and can be combined (image registration) to merge the patient's physiological (SPECT) and anatomical (CT) images.
PET+CT: The PET and CT components used together acquire PET/CT images. The PET images can be corrected for attenuation with the CT images, and can be combined (image registration) to merge the patient's physiological (PET) and anatomical (CT) images.
The system maintains independent functionality of the SPECT, CT and PET components, allowing for single modality SPECT, CT and/ or PET diagnostic imaging.
Software: The Nucline software is an acquisition, display and analysis package intended to aid the clinician to extract diagnostic information supported by image assessment tools, image enhancement features and image quantification of pathologies in images produced from SPECT, CT, PET and other imaging modalities.
This CT system can be used for low dose lung cancer screening in high risk populations.*
*As defined by professional medical societies. Please refer to clinical literature, including the results of the National Lung Screening Trial (N Engl J Med 2011; 365:395-409) and subsequent literature, for further information.
The AnyScan 3.0 NM Scanner Family will enable clinicians to utilize the device to perform separate studies in SPECT-CT, PET-CT, SPECT, PET and multi-slice CT modalities.
The AnyScan 3.0 NM Scanner Family includes the following products:
AnyScan 3.0 NM Scanner Family
| Systems | Product Names | Detector Descriptions |
|---|---|---|
| SPECT | AnyScan DUO-Thera SPECT | XT-94/15.9 detector |
| AnyScan DUO SPECT | UHP-60/9.5 detector | |
| AnyScan TRIO SPECT | ||
| SPECT/CT | AnyScan DUO SPECT/CT | |
| AnyScan TRIO SPECT/CT | ||
| AnyScan TRIO-IQMAX SPECT/CT | MAX-123/9.5 detector | |
| AnyScan TRIO-TheraMAX SPECT/CT | MAX-123/15.9 detector | |
| SPECT/CT/PET | AnyScan DUO SPECT/CT/PET | UHP-60/9.5 detectors |
| AnyScan TRIO SPECT/CT/PET | ||
| AnyScan TRIO-IQMAX SPECT/CT/PET | MAX-123/9.5 detector | |
| AnyScan TRIO-TheraMAX SPECT/CT/PET | MAX-123/15.9 detector | |
| PET/CT | AnyScan PET/CT | PET and CT detectors |
The partial product names 'TRIO' and 'DUO' only differentiate the number of built-in SPECT detectors.
The partial product names 'IQMAX' and 'TheraMAX' only differentiate the type of built-in SPECT detector. The SPECT gamma camera generates nuclear medicine images based on the uptake of radioisotope tracers in a patient's body, and supports integration with CT's anatomical detail for precise reference of the location of the metabolic activity.
The CT component produces cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from either the same axial plane taken at different angles or spiral planes taken at different angles.
The PET component images and measures the distribution of PET radiopharmaceuticals in humans for the purpose of determining various metabolic (molecular) and physiologic functions within the human body and utilizes the CT for fast attenuation correction maps for PET studies and precise anatomical reference for the fused PET and CT images.
The combination of SPECT, CT, and PET in a single device has several benefits. The SPECT subsystem images biochemical function while the CT subsystem images anatomy. The combination enables scans that not only indicate function, e.g., how active a tumor is, but precise localization, e.g., the precise location of that tumor in the body.
Combined SPECT and CT subsystems are intended for SPECT imaging enhanced with spatially registered CT image-based corrections, anatomical localization of tracer uptake and anatomical mapping. CT can be used to correct for the attenuation in SPECT acquisitions. Attenuation in SPECT is an unwanted side effect of the gamma rays scattering and being absorbed by tissue. This can lead to errors in the final image. The CT directly measures attenuation and can be used to create a 3D attenuation map of the patient which can be used to correct the SPECT images. The SPECT-CT scanner can be used to image and track how much dose was delivered to both the target and the surrounding tissue. The system maintains independent functionality of the CT and SPECT subsystems.
Combined PET and CT subsystems are intended for PET imaging enhanced with spatially registered CT image-based corrections, anatomical localization of tracer uptake and anatomical mapping. system maintains independent functionality of the CT and PET subsystems, allowing for single modality CT and/or PET diagnostic imaging.
A patient positioning light marker is generated by a low-power (Class II per IEC 60825-1) red laser.
Nucline software is installed on acquisition workstation to perform patient management, data management, scan control, image reconstruction and image archival and evaluation. All images conform to DICOM imaging format requirements.
The systems also include display equipment, data storage devices, patient and equipment supports, software, and accessories.
InterView XP; InterView FUSION (K221984) and software is integrated for DICOM image visualization and post-processing.
ClariCT (K212074) software is integrated for DICOM CT de-noising.
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(213 days)
Class II
Classification Name: Computed Tomography X-ray system
Regulation Number: 21 CFR §892.1750
The device is a diagnostic imaging system that combines Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) systems. The CT component produces cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of X-ray transmission data. The PET component images the distribution of PET radiopharmaceuticals in the patient body. The PET component utilizes CT images for attenuation correction and anatomical reference in the fused PET and CT images.
This device is to be used by a trained health care professional to gather metabolic and functional information from the distribution of the radiopharmaceutical in the body for the assessment of metabolic and physiologic functions. This information can assist in the evaluation, detection, localization, diagnosis, staging, restaging, follow-up, therapeutic planning and therapeutic outcome assessment of (but not limited to) oncological, cardiovascular, neurological diseases and disorders. Additionally, this device can be operated independently as a whole body multi-slice CT scanner.
AiCE-i for PET is intended to improve image quality and reduce image noise for FDG whole body data by employing deep learning artificial neural network methods which can explore the statistical properties of the signal and noise of PET data. The AiCE algorithm can be applied to improve image quality and denoising of PET images.
Deviceless PET Respiratory gating system, for use with Cartesion Prime PET-CT system, is intended to automatically generate a gating signal from the list-mode PET data. The generated signal can be used to reconstruct motion corrected PET images affected by respiratory motion. In addition, a single motion corrected volume can automatically be generated. Resulting motion corrected PET images can be used to aid clinicians in detection, localization, evaluation, diagnosis, staging, restaging, follow-up of diseases and disorders, radiotherapy planning, as well as their therapeutic planning, and therapeutic outcome assessment. Images of lesions in the thorax, abdomen and pelvis are mostly affected by respiratory motion. Deviceless PET Respiratory gating system may be used with PET radiopharmaceuticals, in patients of all ages, with a wide range of sizes, body habitus and extent/type of disease.
The Cartesion Prime (PCD-1000A/3) V10.21 combines a high-end CT and a high-throughput PET designed to acquire CT, PET and fusion images.
The high-end CT system is a multi-slice helical CT scanner with a gantry aperture of 780 mm and a maximum scan field of view (FOV) of 700 mm. The high-throughput PET system has a digital PET detector utilizing SiPM sensors with temporal resolution of < 250 ps (238 ps typical). Cartesion Prime (PCD-1000A/3) V10.21 is intended to acquire PET images of any desired region of the whole body and CT images of the same region (to be used for attenuation correction or image fusion), to detect the location of positron emitting radiopharmaceuticals in the body with the obtained images. This device is used to gather the metabolic and functional information from the distribution of radiopharmaceuticals in the body for the assessment of metabolic and physiologic functions. This information can assist research, detection, localization, evaluation, diagnosis, staging, restaging, follow-up of diseases and disorders, as well as their therapeutic planning, and therapeutic outcome assessment. This device can also function independently as a whole body multi-slice CT scanner.
The subject device incorporates the latest reconstruction technology, AiCE-i for PET (Advanced Intelligent Clear-IQ Engine- integrated), intended to improve image quality and reduce image noise for FDG whole body data by employing deep learning artificial neural network methods which can more fully explore the statistical properties of the signal and noise of PET data. The AiCE algorithm will be able to better differentiate signal from noise and can be applied to improve image quality and denoising of PET images compared to conventional PET imaging reconstruction.
A Deviceless PET Respiratory gating system has been implemented for use with the subject device. With this subject device, respiration is extracted using a pre-trained neural network. Respiratory-gated reconstruction is performed at a speed equal to or faster than that with "Normal".
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study details for the Cartesion Prime PET-CT System, based on the provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter:
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for Cartesion Prime PET-CT System (K251370)
The submission describes two primary feature enhancements: AiCE-i for PET (AiCE2) and Deviceless PET Respiratory gating system (DRG2).
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Feature/Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implicit) | Reported Device Performance (AiCE-i for PET) | Reported Device Performance (Deviceless PET Respiratory Gating) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AiCE-i for PET - Pediatric Use | Equivalence to cleared methods: - Contrast Recovery Coefficient (CRC) - Background Variability (BGV) - Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) - Absence of artifacts - Quantitativity (SUVmean) | Demonstrated equivalence for CRC, BGV, CNR, absence of artifacts, and quantitativity (SUVmean) compared to cleared methods. | N/A |
| AiCE-i for PET - Image Intensity | Substantial equivalence to current "on/off" method. Improvement over current method for: - Accuracy of SUV (max and mean) - Tumor volume | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to current image intensity methods. Improved over current image intensity setting with respect to accuracy of SUV (max and mean) and tumor volume. | N/A |
| AiCE-i for PET - AiCE2 vs AiCE1 (Phantom) | Equivalence or improvement of AiCE2 (Sharp, Standard, Smooth) compared to AiCE1 for: - SUVmean (10mm sphere) - Background Variability (BGV) - Contrast Recovery Coefficient (CRC) - Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR with Std error) - Preservation of contrast - Improved noise levels - Absence of artifacts | Results across all indices demonstrated either equivalence or improvement by AiCE2. Demonstrated equivalent performance between AiCE1 and AiCE2 with respect to the preservation of contrast and improving noise levels relative to conventional imaging methods. | N/A |
| AiCE-i for PET - Clinical Images | Diagnostic quality across all intensity settings. Consistent performance. Better overall image quality and sharpness. Lower image noise compared to predicate methods. | All three physicians reported that AiCE2 images at all three intensity settings were of diagnostic quality and consistent across all 10 cases. Determined to perform better with respect to overall image quality and image sharpness, as well as exhibit lower image noise compared to the predicate methods (OSEM and Gaussian filter). | N/A |
| Deviceless PET Respiratory Gating - Operational Mode | Substantial equivalence to external device-based gating. Improvement over device-based gating for: - Accuracy of SUV (max and mean) - Tumor volume | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to external device-based respiratory gating. Improved over device-based gating with respect to accuracy of SUV (max and mean) and tumor volume. | N/A |
| Deviceless PET Respiratory Gating - DRG2 vs DRG1 | Equivalency between DRG2 (AI mode) and DRG1 for quantified outputs on high uptake regions (e.g., lesions). | By satisfying all prespecified criteria, it was demonstrated that DRG2 performs with substantial equivalence to DRG1. | N/A |
| Deviceless PET Respiratory Gating - Clinical Images | Diagnostic quality. Similar or better performance than device-based gated images. Better motion correction compared to non-gated images. | All three physicians determined that all images were of diagnostic quality. Deviceless gated images demonstrated similar or better performance as device-based gated images. Resulted in better motion correction compared to non-gated images. | N/A |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
For AiCE-i for PET (AiCE2) - Clinical Images:
- Sample Size: 10 PET DICOM clinical 18F-FDG whole body cases.
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, but the submission notes "selected to cover characteristics common to the intended U.S. patient population." The training data for AiCE2 is mentioned to have over half acquired from the U.S.
For Deviceless PET Respiratory Gating (DRG2) - Clinical Images:
- Sample Size: 10 patients.
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, but the submission notes "selected to cover characteristics common to the intended U.S. patient population." The training data for DRG2 was acquired entirely from the U.S.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
For AiCE-i for PET (AiCE2) - Clinical Images:
- Number of Experts: Three (3) physicians.
- Qualifications: At least 20 years of experience in nuclear medicine.
For Deviceless PET Respiratory Gating (DRG2) - Clinical Images:
- Number of Experts: Three (3) physicians.
- Qualifications: At least 20 years of experience in nuclear medicine.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
The adjudication method is not explicitly stated as 2+1, 3+1, or none. However, for both clinical image evaluations, it states that "All three physicians reported/determined that..." This implies a consensus-based adjudication among the three experts was used to reach the conclusions. It does not indicate individual disagreements were arbitrated by a fourth reader.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done
A formal MRMC comparative effectiveness study, designed to quantify the effect size of human readers improving with AI assistance, was not explicitly described in the provided text. The clinical image evaluations involved expert review and comparison, but the focus was on the algorithm's performance and image quality, not a direct measurement of human reader improvement with vs. without AI assistance.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was Done
Yes, standalone performance was extensively evaluated for both features:
- AiCE-i for PET:
- Bench tests for pediatric use (CRC, BGV, CNR, artifacts, SUVmean equivalence).
- Bench tests for image intensity (SUV max/mean accuracy, tumor volume improvement).
- Phantom testing (NEMA NU-2, Adult and Pediatric NEMA phantoms, Small Pool phantom) comparing AiCE2 to AiCE1 and conventional methods across quantitative metrics (SUVmean, BGV, CRC, SNR) and for artifact absence.
- Deviceless PET Respiratory Gating:
- Bench tests for AI operational mode (equivalence to external device gating, improvements in SUV max/mean, tumor volume).
- Evaluation against predicate DRG1 using reconstructed clinical raw data and quantified outputs.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
- For AiCE-i for PET (AiCE2):
- Phantom Studies: Objective, physics-based ground truth (e.g., known sphere sizes, activity concentrations) for quantitative metrics like SUV, CRC, BGV, SNR.
- Clinical Image Evaluation: Expert consensus/opinion of three nuclear medicine physicians for subjective assessments like diagnostic quality, image sharpness, and noise levels.
- For Deviceless PET Respiratory Gating (DRG2):
- Bench Tests/Comparison to DRG1: Quantitative measurements of SUV (max and mean) and tumor volume from reconstructed data, likely compared against a known or established ground truth from reference reconstructions.
- Clinical Image Evaluation: Expert consensus/opinion of three nuclear medicine physicians for subjective assessments related to diagnostic quality and motion correction effectiveness.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
- For AiCE-i for PET (AiCE2): Subset assembled from FDG studies of sixteen (16) cancer patients.
- For Deviceless PET Respiratory Gating (DRG2): FDG studies of 27 cancer patients.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
The text indicates that both AI algorithms (AiCE2 and DRG2) use deep learning artificial neural network methods. The ground truth for training these networks is implicitly derived from the input PET data itself, with the algorithms learning statistical properties of signal and noise or motion patterns.
- For AiCE-i for PET: The algorithm was "trained to automatically adapt to different noise levels to produce consistently high-quality images." This suggests the training data contained examples of both "noisy" input and perhaps "ideal" or "denoised" outputs (or features that guided the network to achieve denoised outputs with improved image quality), where the "ground truth" was likely the desired image characteristics or underlying signal.
- For Deviceless PET Respiratory Gating: The neural network was "trained on FDG studies... to extract motion information from acquired PET data and to generate a corresponding gating signal." This implies the "ground truth" for training involved identifying and characterizing respiratory motion within the raw PET data, possibly using external motion tracking data if available during training, or highly curated datasets where experts delineated motion patterns. The text does not explicitly state how this ground truth was established, only that it was trained on these patient studies.
Ask a specific question about this device
(136 days)
MINNETONKA, MN 55343
Re: K252217
Trade/Device Name: CT VScore+
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750
system |
| Common Name | System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 892.1750
system |
| Common Name | System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 892.1750
CT VScore+ is a software application intended for non-invasive evaluation of calcified lesions of the coronary arteries based on ECG-gated, non-contrast cardiac CT images for patients aged 30 years or older. The device automatically generates calcium scores for the coronary arteries (combined LM+LAD, RCA, LCX) and highlights the segmented calcium on the original CT image. The device also offers the option for the user to display the calcium scores in the context of reference data from the MESA and Hoff-Kondos databases.
The segmented arteries include combined LM+LAD, RCA, and LCX. To obtain separate LM and LAD results, the user must perform manual segmentation. The segmentation map of calcifications is intended for informational use only and is not intended for detection or diagnostic purposes. The 3D Calcium View output is provided strictly as an informational and supplementary output and should never be used alone as the method of reviewing the calcium segmentation.
CT VScore+ is a software application intended for non-invasive evaluation of calcified lesions of the coronary arteries based on ECG-gated, non-contrast cardiac CT images for patients aged 30 years or older. The application runs on the Vitrea platform.
The device automatically generates Agatston and volume calcium scores for each of the coronary arteries (combined LM+LAD, RCA, LCX) based on the volume and density of the calcium deposits and highlights the Segmented calcium on the original CT image. The device also offers the option for the user to display the calcium scores in the context of reference data from the MESA and Hoff-Kondos databases.
The software uses deep learning-based segmentation methods. Users can edit the automated segmentation, including manually assigning calcifications to anatomical structures.
The device automatically outputs a combined LM+LAD score as the final automated output. To obtain separate LM and LAD results, the user must perform manual segmentation using the provided editing tools.
The device is Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) that operates on ECG-gated, non-contrast cardiac CT DICOM images.
The device does not interact directly with the patient. The device is a software application that runs on the Vitrea platform and processes ECG-gated non-contrast cardiac CT DICOM images. The device automatically generates Agatston and volume calcium scores for each of the coronary arteries (LAD+LM, RCA, LCX) based on the volume and density of the calcium deposits and highlights the segmented calcium on the original CT image. Results can be exported to image management, archival, or reporting systems that support DICOM standards for further review and interpretation.
Results can also be saved in DICOM Structured Reports (DICOM SR) format.
The CT VScore+ device is a software application for non-invasive evaluation of calcified lesions of the coronary arteries from ECG-gated, non-contrast cardiac CT images. The study presented demonstrates the analytical validity and performance of the device against predefined acceptance criteria.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Metric | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Total Agatston Score ICC(2,1) | > 0.95 | 0.997 [95% CI: 0.996–0.998] |
| Total Volume Score ICC(2,1) | > 0.95 | 0.996 [95% CI: 0.995–0.997] |
| Per-Vessel ICC - LCx | > 0.90 | 0.937 |
| Per-Vessel ICC - RCA | > 0.90 | 0.990 |
| Per-Vessel ICC - LM+LAD | > 0.90 | 0.983 |
| CAC-DRS 4-Class Kappa | > 0.90 | 0.959 [95% CI: 0.936–0.982] |
| CAC Standard 5-Class Kappa | > 0.90 | 0.958 [95% CI: 0.938–0.978] |
| Voxelwise Dice Score | Informational Metric | 0.920 overall; LCx 0.874, RCA 0.883, LM+LAD 0.958 |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size (Test Set): 236 independent cases.
- Data Provenance: The pivotal validation dataset was sourced from diverse U.S. sites and scanner vendors. The development dataset, from which the test set was independent, included data from four institutions (two US sites and two Japanese sites). The 236 cases for validation were "independent" at both the patient level and the site level from the development dataset. It is retrospective data.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
- Number of Experts: Three.
- Qualifications of Experts: U.S. board-certified radiologists/cardiologists. (Specific years of experience are not mentioned).
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Adjudication Method: A "2+1 consensus process" was used. This typically means that if two experts agree, their consensus defines the ground truth. If there's a disagreement between two, the third expert acts as a tie-breaker or adjudicator.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
- The provided document does not mention a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study to assess the effect size of human readers improving with AI vs. without AI assistance. The study focuses on the standalone performance of the AI algorithm against a consensus ground truth.
6. Standalone Performance Study (Algorithm Only)
- Yes, a standalone performance study was conducted. The metrics listed in the table (ICC, Kappa, Dice Score) directly assess the performance of the CT VScore+ algorithm in isolation against the established ground truth.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
- Type of Ground Truth: Expert consensus. Specifically, the reference standard ground truth was established by consensus manual scoring on an FDA-cleared device (Vitrea CT VScore, K243240) and a 2+1 consensus process by three U.S. board-certified radiologists/cardiologists.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
- Sample Size (Training Set): 94 cases (part of the 210 cases used for development).
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- The document implies that the ground truth for the training set (part of the development dataset) was established similarly to the validation set's ground truth, i.e., "by consensus manual scoring on an FDA-cleared device (Vitrea CT VScore, K243240)" by experts, given that the development process involved ensuring "robust and unbiased performance." However, the exact details of ground truth establishment specifically for the training set are not explicitly broken out as they are for the pivotal validation dataset. It's reasonable to infer a similar rigorous process if the data was used for deep learning model development.
Ask a specific question about this device
(166 days)
16882
REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Re: K251798
Trade/Device Name: RCT700
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750
System |
| Classification Name | Computed tomography x-ray system |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 892.1750
K213226 |
| Classification name | Computed tomography x-ray system |
| Regulation number | 892.1750
RCT700 is CBCT and panoramic x-ray imaging system with cephalometric. Which is intended to radiographic examination of the dento-maxillofacial, sinus, TMJ, Airway and ENT structure for diagnostic support for adult and pediatric patients. And a model scan is included as an option. Cephalometric image also includes wrist to obtain carpus images for growth and maturity assessment for orthodontic treatment.
The device is to be operated and used by dentists or other legally qualified heath care professionals
RCT700 provides 3D computed tomography for scanning hard tissues such as bone and teeth. By rotating the C-arm, which houses a high-voltage generator, an X-ray tube and a detector on each end, CBCT images of dental maxillofacial structures are obtained by recombining data scanned from the same level at different angles. Functionalities include panoramic image scanning for obtaining images of whole teeth, and a cephalometric option for obtaining cephalometric images.
The software of RCT700 saves the patient and image data and offers an inquiry function, in addition, supports the image generate function intended to obtain images using the RCT700 equipment and various sensors for diagnosis.
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(203 days)
Names:** | Emission Computed Tomography System, 21 CFR 892.1200X-ray Computed Tomography, 21 CFR 892.1750
The PennPET Explorer PET system is a diagnostic imaging device that, together with the co-located IQon CT scanner, combines Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) systems. The IQon CT system images anatomical cross-sections by computer reconstruction of X-ray transmission data. The PET system images the distribution of PET anatomy-specific radiopharmaceuticals in the patient. Together, these systems are used for the purposes of detecting, localizing, diagnosing, staging, re-staging, and follow-up for monitoring therapy response of various diseases in oncology, cardiology, and neurology.
The system is intended to image the whole body, heart, brain, lung, gastrointestinal, bone, lymphatic, and other major organs for a wide range of patient types, sizes, and extent of diseases. The CT scanner can also be operated as fully functional, independent diagnostic tool, including for use in radiation therapy planning.
The PennPET Explorer is based on the PET technology of its predicate device, the Philips Vereos PET/CT scanner, but follows the model of its reference device, the previous Philips Gemini TF PET/CT by having co-located—yet separated—PET and CT scanners served by a common patient table. The PennPET Explorer uses a newly designed 142 cm axial field-of-view (AFOV) PET gantry and is intended to be used with a co-located Philips IQon multi-energy CT and patient table.
The PennPET Explorer PET gantry is a modular system comprising six PET detector rings stacked axially, yielding a 142 cm axial FOV. This allows imaging of the human head, torso, and upper legs in a single frame without moving the patient. The entire imaging chain of components from the detectors to the data acquisition computers is supplied by Philips and consists of components that are used in the Vereos PET scanner. The mechanical structure and data processing software have been modified and developed to handle the additional data from all six PET rings simultaneously.
Each of the six detector rings is substantially equivalent to a Philips Vereos PET scanner.
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(150 days)
K251842**
Trade/Device Name: Dental Computed Tomography X-ray System
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product code: OAS
Review Panel: Radiology
Computed tomography x-ray system | Same |
| Product Code | OAS | OAS | Same |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 892.1750
| 21 CFR 892.1750 | Same |
| Indications for | The product is intended to produce X-ray Cone-Beam Computed
The product is intended to produce X-ray Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Panoramic tomography and Cephalometric (optional) images. The medical institutions can use the images for diagnostic purposes in oral and maxillofacial regions. The product is intended for use in hospitals and clinics, operated and used by trained professionals under the guidance of a physician.
The device is used for X-ray image diagnosis of oral and maxillofacial region in medical institutions through X-ray cone-beam computed tomography, panoramic and cephalometric photography. The device is intended for use in hospitals and clinics, operated and used by trained professionals under the guidance of a physician.
This device is divided into two models: Matrix 7000(Rubik X1), Matrix 7800(Rubik X3).
The device is composed of X-ray tube head, plate detector, control device, positioning aid, frame, cephalometric positioning shooting aid, workstation software, etc.
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(125 days)
KNOXVILLE, TN 37932
Re: K251805
Trade/Device Name: syngo.CT Dual Energy
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750
- Computed Tomography X-ray System
Classification Panel: Radiology
CFR Section: 21 CFR §892.1750 - Computed Tomography X-ray System
Classification Panel: Radiology
CFR Section: 21 CFR §892.1750
syngo.CT Dual Energy is designed to operate with CT images based on two different X-ray spectra.
The various materials of an anatomical region of interest have different attenuation coefficients, which depend on the used energy. These differences provide information on the chemical composition of the scanned body materials. syngo.CT Dual Energy combines images acquired with low and high energy spectra to visualize this information. Depending on the region of interest, contrast agents may be used.
The general functionality of the syngo.CT Dual Energy application is as follows:
- Bone Marrow ²⁾
- Bone Removal ¹⁾
- Brain Hemorrhage ¹⁾
- Gout Evaluation ¹⁾
- Hard Plaques ¹⁾
- Heart PBV
- Kidney Stones ¹⁾ ²⁾ ³⁾
- Liver VNC ¹⁾
- Lung Mono ¹⁾
- Lung Perfusion ¹⁾
- Lung Vessels ¹⁾
- Monoenergetic ¹⁾ ²⁾
- Monoenergetic Plus ¹⁾ ²⁾
- Optimum Contrast ¹⁾ ²⁾
- Rho/Z ¹⁾ ²⁾
- SPP (Spectral Post-Processing Format) ¹⁾ ²⁾
- SPR (Stopping Power Ratio) ¹⁾ ²⁾
- Virtual Non-Calcium (VNCa) ¹⁾ ²⁾
- Virtual Unenhanced ¹⁾
The availability of each feature depends on the Dual Energy scan mode.
¹⁾ This functionality supports data from Siemens Healthineers Photon-Counting CT scanners acquired in QuantumPlus modes.
²⁾ This functionality supports data from Siemens Healthineers Photon-Counting CT scanners acquired in QuantumPeak modes.
³⁾ Kidney Stones is designed to support the visualization of the chemical composition of kidney stones and especially the differentiation between uric acid and non-uric acid stones. For full identification of the kidney stone, additional clinical information should be considered such as patient history and urine testing. Only a well-trained radiologist can make the final diagnosis upon consideration of all available information. The accuracy of identification is decreased in obese patients.
Dual energy offers functions for qualitative and quantitative post-processing evaluations. syngo.CT Dual Energy is a post-processing application consisting of several post-processing application classes that can be used to improve the visualization of the chemical composition of various energy dependent materials in the human body when compared to single energy CT. Depending on the organ of interest, the user can select and modify different application classes or parameters and algorithms.
Different body regions require specific tools that allow the correct evaluation of data sets. syngo.CT Dual Energy provides a range of application classes that meet the requirements of each evaluation type. The different application classes for the subject device can be combined into one workflow.
The product is intended to be used for at least 21-year-old humans.
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(271 days)
, CA 92806
Re: K250060
Trade/Device Name: GT300; GT300-C
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750
, Dental |
| Classification Name | Computed tomography x-ray system |
| Regulation Number | 892.1750
It is intended to produce 2D (panoramic, cephalometric) or 3D (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) images. It provides diagnostic details of the dental-maxillofacial, TMJ and SINUS for adult and pediatric patients. The system also utilizes carpal images for orthodontic treatment.
GT300 & GT300-C is the Diagnostic computed tomography limited view field X-ray System which consists of image acquisition modes; panorama, cephalometric, and computed tomography. It is used to capture scanned image for obtaining diagnostic information for craniofacial surgery or other treatments.
This equipment is a device that generates and controls X-rays and consists of an X-ray generator, an X-ray control unit, an X-ray support unit, and some accessories (Chinrest, Exposure switch, Temple support, Carpus Plate).
GT300 and GT300-C have same intended use, essential design and manufacturing. The GT300 can acquire panoramic and CT images, while the GT300-C can acquire panoramic, CT, and Cephalo images. The only difference is the presence or absence of the Cephalo feature.
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(212 days)
Bunkerhill MAC is a software device intended for use in detecting presence and estimating quantity of mitral annulus calcification for adult patients aged 40 years and above. The device automatically analyzes non-gated, non-contrast chest computed tomography (CT) images collected during clinical care and outputs the region of interest (intended for informational purposes only) and quantification of detected calcium.
The device-generated quantification can be viewed in the patient report at the discretion of the physician, and the physician also has the option of viewing the device-generated calcium region of interest in a diagnostic image viewer. The subject device output in no way replaces the original patient report or the original non-gated, non-contrast CT scan; both are still available to be viewed and used at the discretion of the physician.
The device is intended to provide information to the physician to provide assistance during review of the patient's case. Results of the subject device are not intended to be used on a stand-alone basis and are solely intended to aid and provide information to the physician. In all cases, further action taken on a patient should only come at the recommendation of the physician after further reviewing the patient's results.
Bunkerhill MAC is a software as a medical device (SaMD) product that interfaces with compatible and commercially available computed tomography (CT) systems. Bunkerhill MAC detects, localizes, and quantifies mitral annulus calcification in non-gated, non-contrast chest CT studies. The core features of the product are:
- Detection of mitral annulus calcification at an Agatston-equivalent score threshold of 0 AU.
- Quantification of the overall mitral annulus calcification burden in the form of an estimated Agatston Score up to 5000 Agatston-equivalent units
- Localization of estimated calcium burden in the form of circular region of interest applied to a copy of the original CT scan.
Here's a detailed breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study proving the Bunkerhill MAC device meets them, based on the provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter:
Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Metric | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Agreement Rate | Derived from predicate device performance and clinical literature on inter-reader agreement of manual segmentation (Specific numerical criteria not explicitly stated in the document, but is implied to be met successfully based on the conclusion). | Met successfully |
| Negative Agreement Rate | Derived from predicate device performance and clinical literature on inter-reader agreement of manual segmentation (Specific numerical criteria not explicitly stated in the document, but is implied to be met successfully based on the conclusion). | Met successfully |
| Precision (circular ROI) | Derived from predicate device performance and clinical literature on inter-reader agreement of manual segmentation (Specific numerical criteria not explicitly stated in the document, but is implied to be met successfully based on the conclusion). | 0.885 (95% CI: 0.848, 0.919) |
| Recall (circular ROI) | Derived from predicate device performance and clinical literature on inter-reader agreement of manual segmentation (Specific numerical criteria not explicitly stated in the document, but is implied to be met successfully based on the conclusion). | 0.867 (95% CI: 0.834, 0.895) |
| Bland-Altman Agreement Analysis (Bias) | Derived from predicate device performance and clinical literature on inter-reader agreement of manual segmentation. (Specific numerical criteria not explicitly stated in the document, but is implied to be met successfully based on the conclusion). | -6.47 AU |
| Bland-Altman Agreement Analysis (Lower Limit of Agreement) | Derived from predicate device performance and clinical literature on inter-reader agreement of manual segmentation. (Specific numerical criteria not explicitly stated in the document, but is implied to be met successfully based on the conclusion). | -399.57 AU |
| Bland-Altman Agreement Analysis (Upper Limit of Agreement) | Derived from predicate device performance and clinical literature on inter-reader agreement of manual segmentation. (Specific numerical criteria not explicitly stated in the document, but is implied to be met successfully based on the conclusion). | 386.64 AU |
| Correlation Coefficient | Derived from predicate device performance and clinical literature on inter-reader agreement of manual segmentation. (Specific numerical criteria not explicitly stated in the document, but is implied to be met successfully based on the conclusion). | Met successfully |
Study Details
-
Sample Size used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Test Set Sample Size: Not explicitly stated as a number of cases, but referred to as "the pivotal dataset."
- Data Provenance: "curated from multiple sites across three geographical regions in the United States." (Retrospective study).
-
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- The document states "agreement of the device output compared to the established reference standard." It does not explicitly state the number of experts used or their qualifications for establishing this "established reference standard." It only refers to "clinical literature in high impact journals that investigate the inter-reader agreement of manual segmentation" as informing the acceptance criteria.
-
Adjudication method for the test set:
- The document does not explicitly state an adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1) for establishing the ground truth of the test set. It refers to an "established reference standard."
-
If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study comparing human readers with AI assistance versus human readers without AI assistance was not conducted or reported in this document. The study was a "stand-alone retrospective study for detection, localization and agreement of the device output compared to the established reference standard."
-
If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Yes, a standalone study was performed. The document explicitly states: "The Bunkerhill MAC performance was validated in a stand-alone retrospective study for detection, localization and agreement of the device output compared to the established reference standard."
-
The type of ground truth used:
- The ground truth was an "established reference standard" which was used for comparison against the device's output. The document implies this reference standard is based on non-gated CT reference measurements and potentially "manual segmentation" informed by clinical literature. It does not explicitly state pathology confirmation or direct outcomes data as the primary ground truth.
-
The sample size for the training set:
- The sample size for the training set is not provided in the document.
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- The document does not provide information on how the ground truth for the training set was established. It only refers to the performance validation on a "pivotal dataset" (test set).
Ask a specific question about this device
(203 days)
NIJMEGEN, 6525 EC
NETHERLANDS
Re: K250766
Trade/Device Name: LungQ 4
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1750
Name | Computer Tomography X-ray system |
| Product Code | JAK |
| Classification | Class II, 21 CFR 892.1750
| LungQ v3.0.0 |
|------------------|---------------|
| Predicate Classification | Class II, 21 CFR 892.1750
-|
| 510(k) Number | K250766 | K232412 |
| Product Code | JAK | Same |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 892.1750
The Thirona LungQ software provides reproducible CT values for pulmonary tissue and specified endobronchial implants which is essential for providing quantitative support for diagnosis, treatment planning and follow up examination. The LungQ software can be used to support physician in the diagnosis and documentation of pulmonary tissues images (e.g., abnormalities) from CT thoracic datasets. Three-D segmentation and isolation of sub-compartments, volumetric analysis, density evaluations, estimated chronic perfusion defect analysis, fissure evaluation and reporting tools are provided.
The LungQ software is designed to aid in the interpretation of Computed Tomography (CT) scans of the thorax that may contain pulmonary abnormalities. LungQ is a docker image with a standalone command-line software which must be run from a command-line interpreter and does not have a graphical user interface.
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 92