Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K131338
    Device Name
    DERMA HOOD
    Date Cleared
    2013-07-10

    (62 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.6320
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    510k Summary Text (Full-text Search) :

    74th Street Scottdale AZ 85260

    Re: K131338

    Trade/Device Name: Derma Hood Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.6320

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Derma Hood is an accessory for the TotalExam HD Examination Light. The Derma Hood utilizes standard off-the-shelf light filters and lenses. The Derma Hood accessory is designed for use within healthcare facilities (Doctor's offices, clinics, hospitals, etc.).

    Device Description

    The Derma Hood is an accessory for the TotalExam HD Examination Light. The Derma Hood utilizes standard off-the-shelf light filters and lenses.

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but based on the provided document, there is no information about the acceptance criteria, study details, or performance of the "Derma Hood" device. The document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter, which primarily focuses on classifying the device and confirming its substantial equivalence to a predicate device. It does not include the detailed technical performance data or specific study results you've requested.

    The document mentions:

    • Trade/Device Name: Derma Hood
    • Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.6320 (AC-Powered Medical Examination Light)
    • Regulatory Class: I
    • Product Code: PEQ
    • Indications for Use: "The Derma Hood is an accessory for the TotalExam HD Examination Light. The Derma Hood utilizes standard off-the-shelf light filters and lenses. The Derma Hood accessory is designed for use within healthcare facilities (Doctor's offices, clinics, hospitals, etc.)."

    However, it does not provide any of the following information requested in your prompt:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample size for the test set or data provenance.
    3. Number and qualifications of experts for ground truth.
    4. Adjudication method for the test set.
    5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study results or effect size.
    6. Standalone algorithm performance.
    7. Type of ground truth used.
    8. Sample size for the training set.
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1