Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(115 days)
The radiofrequency-energy only delivery components of the Thermage ThermaCool NXT System and Accessories are indicated for use in:
- Dermatologic and general surgical procedures for electrocoagulation and hemostasis;
- Non-invasive treatment of periorbital wrinkles and rhytids including upper and lower eyelids;
- Non-invasive treatment of wrinkles and rhytids.
The simultaneous application of radiofrequency energy and skin vibration by the Thermage ThermaCool NXT System and Accessories is indicated for use in:
- Dermatologic and general surgical procedures for electrocoagulation and hemostasis;
- Non-invasive treatment of periorbital wrinkles and rhytids;
- Non-invasive treatment of wrinkles and rhytids;
- Temporary improvement in the appearance of cellulite;
- Relief of minor muscle aches and pains;
- Relief of muscle spasms:
- Temporary improvement of local circulation (i.e., blood circulation).
The Thermage ThermaCool NXT System delivers capacitively coupled radiofrequency energy while cooling tissue by conduction. Components and accessories include the Multiplex (16.0) Handpiece, Standard Handpiece, Treatment Tips, Return Pad, Electronic Footswich (optional), Cryogen Canister and Coupling fluid. The front panel of the ThermaCool NXT System is equipped with a receptacle to connect the Return Pad to each Handpiece Assembly, comprising the return path for electric current. The modified Standard Handpiece offers user-selectable vibration to provide concurrent mechanical manipulation of tissue in a manner similar to the predicate devices listed.
This 510(k) submission (K090580) for the Thermage ThermaCool NXT System (TG-2B) provides a safety summary, but it does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria, performance studies, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or expert involvement.
The document states in section F, "Summary": "By virtue of design, principle of operation, materials and intended use, the Thermage ThermaCool NXT System and Accessories is substantially equivalent to devices currently cleared for marketing in the United States." This indicates that the device was cleared based on substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than new clinical effectiveness or performance studies against specific acceptance criteria.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information. The document focuses on regulatory classification, predicate devices, and intended use.
Ask a specific question about this device
(184 days)
The TherMassager is indicated for use in:
- Relief of minor muscle aches and pains
- Relief of muscle spasm
- Temporary improvement of local circulation (i.e., blood circulation)
- Temporary improvement in the appearance of cellulite
The TherMassager is a self-contained, 9.0 VIDC electrically powered therapeutic massager. The basic configuration is that of an ergonomically rounded hand-held box-like unit. Weight is approximately 4 pounds. The housing is made from medical grade plastic and contains a suction pump, a massage motor and skin rollers. The outside of the unit is affixed with a strap which may be secured over the operators hand to provide additional grip during treatment application. Three treatment rollers are supplied with each unit. The TherMassager unit has I spiral roller, 1 ribbed roller and 1 lobed (contoured) roller. The rollers are made from medical grade silicone elastomer meeting ISO 10993 biocompatibility standards.
The provided text does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria in the manner requested. This document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a therapeutic massager, the TherMassager.
Instead, the document details the device's substantial equivalence to a predicate device (UPC Therapeutic Massager, K990445) based on a comparison of device characteristics and intended use. The core of this submission is to demonstrate that the new device is as safe and effective as a legally marketed device, not to present novel performance data from a specific study against predefined acceptance criteria.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC study details, standalone performance, or ground truth information because this type of data is not present in the provided 510(k) summary.
The closest information available related to "acceptance criteria" is the comparison of device characteristics to the predicate device to establish substantial equivalence.
Here's a breakdown of what can be extracted or inferred based on the document's content, acknowledging the limitations for your specific request:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
This information is not provided in a format of "acceptance criteria" versus "reported performance." Instead, the document presents a side-by-side comparison of features between the TherMassager and the predicate device (LPG). Substantial equivalence is the "acceptance criteria" here, meaning the device's characteristics and performance are similar enough to the predicate to be considered safe and effective for the same indications.
| Feature | TherMassager (Reported Device) | LPG (Predicate Device) | Substantially Equivalent? (SF?) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indications for Use | Relief of minor muscle aches and painsRelief of muscle spasmTemporary improvement of local circulationTemporary improvement in the appearance of cellulite | SAME | YES |
| Power Requirements | AC/DC AdaptorInput = 120 VDC - 60 HzOutput = 9 VDC | 120 VAC -- 60 Hz | YES |
| Weight: MassagerAC/DC Adapter | 1.8 Kg.5 Kg | 2 Kg - Handpiece only | YES |
| Leakage Current | ≤50 µamp | <50 µamp | YES |
| Vacuum (Torr) | Variable, 760-400 Torr | Variable, 50-500 mBar (720 - 385 Torr equivalent) | YES |
| Materials | Housing: medical grade plastic - 2401 MT SGRollers silicone - ISO 10993 compliant | Medical grade materials, unspecified | YES |
| Massage Unit | Variable speed - User controlled | Variable according to vacuum freq. and cycle rate | YES |
| Vacuum frequency & cycle rate | Constant - force variable | Variable - pulsates | YES |
| Rollers | Powered | Powered | YES |
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
Not applicable. This is a 510(k) submission based on substantial equivalence to an existing device, not a performance study with a test set of data points. There is no mention of a clinical or analytical study with a test set of samples.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
Not applicable. No ground truth establishment by experts is described as part of this 510(k) submission.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. There is no test set or adjudication process described.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This device is a therapeutic massager, not an AI or imaging diagnostic device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This device is a physical therapeutic massager, not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
Not applicable. The basis for equivalence relies on comparing technical specifications and intended use to an already legally marketed device, not on clinical ground truth or outcomes data for the new device.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. There is no mention of a training set for an algorithm or model.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. There is no mention of a training set or ground truth establishment.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1