Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K093641
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2010-12-08

    (379 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    876.5820
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K830575, K962959, K974899

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The TANGO3 Water Storage Tank with Ozone Disinfection System is intended to be used for disinfection of the water distribution system of a dialysis facility. The tank of the TANGO3 is also used as the water holding tank of the distribution system. The disinfection process is completely automated. Ozone concentration during disinfection is between 0.2 ppm and 0.3 ppm. The distribution system will be exposed to ozone for one (1) period of 45 minutes and three (3) subsequent periods of 30 minutes with adequate water flushes between them and at the end, leaving the distribution loop without ozone.

    Device Description

    The TANGO3 Water Storage Tank with Ozone Disinfection System is specifically designed to facilitate ozone induction into the storage tank, and then distribute the ozonated water through the distribution water loop during non-operational hours of a hemodialysis facility. The storage tank of the TANGO3 system is filled with adequate water and the ozone concentration is increased. The ozonated water is distributed throughout the the disinfection process, the system and distribution system. To complete the disinfection process, the system and distribution system. To complete The described process is repeated three (3) more times. After the last cycle TANGO3 will leave the system residual free of ozone. To accomplish this, TANGO3 has a corona discharge generator that generates ozone from a source of dry air. The air dryer consists of two heat regenerative desiccant modules. The ozone if om a injected into the tank by means of a venturi based injection system. Once in the tank, the ozonated water is sent to the distribution loop with a centrifugal pump. Ozone levels are monitored at the return of the loop. Two (2) flow sensors, located at the input and output of the distribution loop will assure that the dialysis facility is not utilizing water while ozone is present in the loop.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided text, outlining the acceptance criteria and the study details for the TANGO3 Water Storage Tank with Ozone Disinfection System:

    Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The acceptance criteria for the TANGO3 device are implied through its intended use and the description of its disinfection process, which must result in a disinfected water distribution system. The key performance metric is the ability to disinfect.

    Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Effective disinfection of the water distribution system of a dialysis facility.In vitro testing was performed to validate the disinfection capabilities of TANGO3 with waterborne organisms. A field test was performed to validate that TANGO3 can address the needs of facilities with known water contamination issues. The results from these tests show that the TANGO3 performed as expected.
    Automated disinfection process.The disinfection process is completely automated.
    Ozone concentration during disinfection between 0.2 ppm and 0.3 ppm.Ozone concentration during disinfection is between 0.2 ppm and 0.3 ppm.
    Specific exposure times for ozone: one (1) period of 45 minutes and three (3) subsequent periods of 30 minutes, with adequate water flushes.The distribution system will be exposed to ozone for one (1) period of 45 minutes and three (3) subsequent periods of 30 minutes with adequate water flushes between them and at the end, leaving the distribution loop without ozone.
    System (and distribution loop) is residual-free of ozone after the process.After the last cycle TANGO3 will leave the system residual free of ozone.
    Material compatibility with ozone for all materials in water distribution loops.All materials found in water distribution loops have been tested for material compatibility with ozone.
    Performance as intended for each function.Each function of the TANGO3 System was tested to see if it performed as intended. Any errors or failures detected during testing were corrected.

    Study Details

    Based on the provided text, the available information regarding the studies is limited.

    1. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

      • In vitro testing: The sample size for the waterborne organisms used is not specified.
      • Field test: This involved "facilities with known water contamination issues." The number of facilities (sample size) is not specified.
      • Data Provenance: The text does not explicitly state the country of origin. Given it's a 510(k) submission to the FDA, it's reasonable to infer the data was generated in support of US regulatory requirements, but specific locations are not provided. Both in vitro and field tests suggest prospective data collection for the purpose of the submission.
    2. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications:

      • This information is not provided in the text. The concept of "ground truth" as typically applied to expert consensus for diagnostic imaging or similar scenarios isn't directly applicable here, as the studies involve scientific testing of disinfection efficacy and functional performance. The "ground truth" for disinfection would be the actual reduction in waterborne organisms measured post-disinfection.
    3. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

      • This information is not provided and is not typically relevant for this type of device and testing. Adjudication methods like "2+1" or "3+1" are usually employed in studies where human readers interpret data (e.g., medical images) and their agreement (or disagreement leading to a tie-breaker) is resolved. The TANGO3 studies are focused on direct physical and biological performance.
    4. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:

      • No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study assesses how human readers' diagnostic performance changes with and without AI assistance, which is not applicable to a water disinfection system.
    5. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study:

      • Yes, in essence, standalone performance was evaluated. The disinfection system operates automatically as described. The in vitro and field tests evaluated the system's performance (disinfection capabilities, functional performance) without direct human intervention in the disinfection process itself, beyond initiation and monitoring. The "algorithm" here would be the automated sequence of ozone generation, circulation, and flushing.
    6. Type of Ground Truth Used:

      • For the in vitro testing, the ground truth would be the measured reduction in viable waterborne organisms (e.g., colony-forming units) before and after disinfection. This would be objective microbiological data.
      • For the field test, the ground truth would be the measured water quality parameters and microbial counts in the dialysis facilities, showing a reduction in "known water contamination issues" after using TANGO3. This would be a combination of microbiological and chemical analysis.
      • For functional testing, the ground truth would be the actual performance against design specifications (e.g., ozone concentration, timing, ozone-free residual).
    7. Sample Size for the Training Set:

      • This information is not provided. The text describes performance testing, not the development of a machine learning model that would typically require a training set. The "training" here would be the engineering design and iteration process.
    8. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

      • As there's no mention of a traditional machine learning training set, this question is not applicable. The "ground truth" in the context of engineering development would be established through established scientific principles, engineering standards, and iterative design and testing.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1