Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K061557
    Device Name
    FUSION
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2006-09-15

    (102 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.1130
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K012891, K920713

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Fusion™ System and accessories blood pressure measurement system is intended to be used on patients with wrist circumference of 11 cm - 22 cm by trained medical personnel to continually monitor systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure and pulse rate.

    The Fusion System module option of Nellcor OxiMAX Option (K012891), is indicated for the continuous non-invasive monitoring of a patient's functional oxygen saturation of arterial hemoglobin (SpO2) by trained medical personnel.

    The Fusion System module option of Kendall Genius Thermometer (K920713) is indicated for the measuring of a patient's body temperature.

    This device is prescription use only.

    Device Description

    The Fusion™ System is a non-invasive blood pressure monitor that uses a pressure sensor placed directly on top of the radial artery. This sensor is noninvasive and eliminates the need for an occlusive inflatable cuff. This device is intended to be used on patients by trained medical personnel to continually monitor systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure, and pulse rate.

    The Fusion™ System uses a patented "sweep technique" which applies a varying force on the radial artery. The counterpressure in the artery produces a signal which is digitized and used to calculate blood pressure parameters.

    The sensor measures the pulse at the point of maximum energy transfer; the wave shapes are analyzed by Medwave's proprietary algorithms. Parameters are extracted from the waveforms and a set of coefficients are applied to them yielding systolic, mean, and diastolic pressures approximately every 15 heart beats. These algorithms have been tested and validated in clinical studies by synchronized comparisons to arterial line pressure waveforms.

    Patient pressures can be monitored visually by viewing the screen and audibly entering limits into the Fusion™ System alarm menu. Patient measurements above or below the limits will be automatically brought to the attention of the caregiver through these visual and audible alarms. A Start/Stop key provides the operator with an option to cancel operation at anytime.

    The Fusion™ System can be ordered with additional module options:

    • · Tyco Healthcare Nellcor OxiMax Pulse Oximetry System (K012891) provides monitoring of a patient's functional oxygen saturation of arterial hemoglobin.
    • · Kendall Genius Thermometer (K920713) provides patient's body temperature readings.
    • · Seiko Thermal Printer SII providing hardcopy of readings selected to print.
    AI/ML Overview

    The Medwave, Inc. Fusion™ System is a non-invasive blood pressure monitor. Here's an analysis of its acceptance criteria and the supporting study:

    1. Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The device's performance claims are based on meeting industry standards for non-invasive blood pressure monitors.

    Acceptance Criteria (ANSI/AAMI SP10-2002)Reported Device Performance (Fusion™ System)
    Mean Difference± 5 mmHg or less (for systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure)
    Standard Deviation8 mmHg or less (for systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure)
    Pulse Measurement Range40 - 200 bpm
    Pulse Measurement Accuracy± 5 bpm or 10% of the measured pulse frequency
    Blood Pressure Measurement Range40 - 240 mmHg (systolic and diastolic)
    Operating Temperature Conditions10°C (50°F) - 40°C (104°F)
    Operating Humidity Conditions15 - 90 percent (noncondensing)
    Operating Range in Altitude Conditions-170 to 1700 meters (-500 to 5000 feet), referenced to sea level
    Life testminimum of 10,000 full scale cycles
    Electrical SafetyMeets IEC60601 and IEC601 standards
    Electromagnetic CompatibilityMeets IEC60601 standards
    BiocompatibilityMeets Center For Devices And Radiological Health Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitor Guidance Document
    Device LabelingMeets ANSI/AAMI SP10-2002, IEC60601, and Center For Devices And Radiological Health Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitor Guidance Document
    Outer Container LabelingMeets ANSI/AAMI SP10-2002, IEC60601, and Center For Devices And Radiological Health Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitor Guidance Document
    Information ManualMeets ANSI/AAMI SP10-2002, IEC60601, and Center For Devices And Radiological Health Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitor Guidance Document
    Component LabelingMeets ANSI/AAMI SP10-2002, IEC60601, and Center For Devices And Radiological Health Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitor Guidance Document
    Power System LabelingMeets ANSI/AAMI SP10-2002 and Center For Devices And Radiological Health Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitor Guidance Document
    Storage Conditions-20°C (-40°F) - 50°C (122°F)
    Pressure Indicator AccuracyMeets ANSI/AAMI SP10-2002
    Overall System EfficacyMeets ANSI/AAMI SP10-2002
    Software TestingMeets Medwave 795-0000 guidelines
    Intraarterial Method as Reference StandardUsed as the reference standard

    2. Sample Size and Data Provenance

    The document indicates that clinical data supporting the performance claims is "on file at Medwave, Inc." However, it does not specify the sample size used for the test set or the country of origin. It also doesn't explicitly state whether the data was retrospective or prospective.

    3. Number of Experts and Qualifications

    The document does not provide information on the number of experts used to establish ground truth or their qualifications.

    4. Adjudication Method

    The document does not specify an adjudication method for the test set.

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    An MRMC study was not conducted as this is a medical device for automated measurements, not an AI diagnostic imaging system that would typically involve human readers. The device is intended to provide automated measurements.

    6. Standalone Performance Study

    Yes, a standalone study was performed. The device's algorithms were "tested and validated in clinical studies by synchronized comparisons to arterial line pressure waveforms." This indicates that the algorithm's performance was evaluated independently against a gold standard.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth used for validating the blood pressure measurements was the intra-arterial line pressure waveforms. This is considered a highly accurate and invasive "gold standard" for blood pressure measurement.

    8. Sample Size for the Training Set

    The document does not specify the sample size used for the training set of the proprietary algorithms.

    9. How Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    The document states that "Parameters are extracted from the waveforms and a set of coefficients is applied to them, yielding systolic, mean and diastolic pressures. The algorithms have been tested against intra arterial line pressure waveforms and proven to meet industry standards..." This implies that the ground truth for training (or at least for validation) was established using intra-arterial line pressure waveforms.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K970182
    Date Cleared
    1997-08-18

    (213 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.1025
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K920713, K933404

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The DINAMAP Compact Monitor is intended to monitor a single adult, pediatric or neonatal patient's vital signs at the bedside. Vital signs parameters include noninvasive blood pressure (systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure), pulse rate, temperature and/or oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry). The portable device is designed for use in numerous clinical settings, primarily in various hospital departments such as emergency, radiology, recovery, medical/surgical, labor & delivery, endoscopy, cardiac step-down, etc. and can also be used during many specialized procedures in satellite areas, or in ambulatory surgery centers, physicians' offices or alternate care settings.

    Device Description

    The DINAMAP Compact Monitor is a prescription device intended for use only by health care professionals. Three configurations of the monitor with the following vital signs parameters will be available: Noninvasive Blood Pressure and Heart Rate, Noninvasive Blood Pressure and Heart Rate, and Predictive Oral/Rectal Thermometry Noninvasive Blood Pressure and Heart Rate, Predictive Thermometry, and Nellcor® Pulse Oximetry and Heart Rate In addition, the currently-marketed Sherwood Medical Inc. FirstTemp™ Genius™ Infrared Tympanic Thermometry Unit (K920713) may be physically attached to the side of (but not electrically integrated with) the DINAMAP Compact Monitor. The device is designed for monitoring adult, pediatric and neonatal patients in hospital, outpatient surgery center, physician office and/or alternate healthcare settings. It is portable and capable of operation from an external AC mains power source or an internal lead-acid rechargeable battery. An optional printer is also available. The Compact Monitor provides connection for the currently marketed Johnson & Johnson Medical, Inc. (JJMI, formerly Critikon, Inc.) OBSERVER* Central Station (K933404), other monitoring devices, a remote display, data collection system, remote alarm and/or host information system.

    AI/ML Overview

    The DINAMAP Compact Monitor is a prescription device intended for use by healthcare professionals for monitoring vital signs (noninvasive blood pressure, pulse rate, temperature, and/or oxygen saturation) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients in various clinical settings.

    Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and supporting studies based on the provided text:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The provided text for the K970182 submission does not explicitly state numerical acceptance criteria for each vital sign parameter (e.g., specific accuracy ranges for blood pressure or temperature). Instead, it states that "Several clinical studies were conducted which demonstrate safety and effectiveness" for:

    • Predictive Thermometry Accuracy
    • Adult Noninvasive Blood Pressure Accuracy
    • Pediatric Noninvasive Blood Pressure Accuracy
    • Neonatal Noninvasive Blood Pressure Accuracy
    • Pulse Oximetry (implicitly covering accuracy for this parameter, though "accuracy" isn't explicitly listed next to it as for the others)

    The document concludes that the device is "safe, effective and substantially equivalent to the predicate devices." This implies that the performance in these clinical studies met the expected safety and effectiveness benchmarks, likely derived from the predicate devices or relevant standards at the time (though these specific benchmarks are not detailed).

    Therefore, a table with specific numerical acceptance criteria and reported performance cannot be fully constructed from the provided text.

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document mentions "Several clinical studies" for predictive thermometry accuracy, and adult, pediatric, and neonatal noninvasive blood pressure accuracy. However, no specific sample sizes for these test sets are provided in the current document. The data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective nature) is also not mentioned.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications

    The document does not specify the number of experts used or their qualifications for establishing ground truth for any of the clinical studies mentioned.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    The document does not describe any adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) used for the test sets.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done

    This device is a vital signs monitor, not an AI-assisted diagnostic imaging device. Therefore, a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study comparing human readers with and without AI assistance is not applicable and was not performed. The device itself performs the measurements; it does not assist human interpretation of complex cases in the same way AI might for medical imaging.

    6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) was Done

    The device is inherently a "standalone" system in its measurement function, as it provides direct readings of vital signs. The clinical studies mentioned (e.g., "Predictive Thermometry Accuracy," "Adult Noninvasive Blood Pressure Accuracy") would inherently assess the algorithm's performance in generating these measurements independently. There isn't a "human-in-the-loop" for the initial measurement generation itself; humans then interpret and act upon the device's numerical output. Therefore, yes, standalone performance (algorithm only) was assessed for each vital sign parameter.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The document does not explicitly state the type of ground truth used for each parameter. However, for a vital signs monitor:

    • Noninvasive Blood Pressure: Ground truth would typically be established by invasive blood pressure measurements (e.g., arterial line) or a highly accurate non-invasive reference standard (e.g., mercury sphygmomanometer with auscultation by trained observers), often performed simultaneously or sequentially with the device under test.
    • Pulse Oximetry: Ground truth would typically involve co-oximetry of arterial blood samples.
    • Predictive Temperature: Ground truth would likely be established by a continuous core body temperature measurement device or a highly accurate traditional thermometer (e.g., rectal probe for a set duration) against which the "predictive" algorithm's output is compared.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    The document does not specify any sample sizes for a "training set." This type of conventional "training set" concept is more common in modern machine learning-based devices. For this device, developed in the mid-1990s, the development process would have involved engineering design, calibration, and verification testing, rather than a distinct "training set" in the AI sense. The clinical studies mentioned serve as the validation evidence.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

    As no specific "training set" is described in the context of modern AI/ML development, the method for establishing ground truth for such a set is not applicable/described. The device's algorithms were likely developed and refined through engineering principles, calibration studies, and internal testing, with the clinical studies serving as external validation against observed clinical states (ground truth as described in point 7).

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1