Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K031273
    Date Cleared
    2003-07-15

    (84 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.5700
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K990990, K910862

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Sure-Point™ HDR Needle Template is designed to allow precision ultrasound probe alignment, placement and position retention of HDR needles in cancer treatments. It was designed to work with commercially available high dose rate remote afterloaders. A specific application is the treatment of prostate (or other) cancer.

    Device Description

    Template for Seeding Device: Probe Stabilization Device. Applicator for Remote Controlled Afterloading Brachytherapy.

    AI/ML Overview

    This FDA 510(k) summary for the "Sure-Point™ HDR Needle Template" (K031273) does not contain the information requested in your prompt regarding acceptance criteria and performance studies.

    This document is a declaration of substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices. This means that the manufacturer is asserting their device is as safe and effective as devices already on the market, based on similar intended use, technological characteristics, and materials.

    Therefore, I cannot provide a table of acceptance criteria, device performance, sample sizes, ground truth information, or details about comparative effectiveness studies, because this information is not present in the provided text.

    Here's what I can infer from the document:

    • Device Type: This is a physical medical device (a template for brachytherapy needles), not an AI/software device that would typically have performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or AUC.
    • Approval Basis: Substantial equivalence, not based on a new performance study demonstrating effectiveness against specific acceptance criteria.
    • Study Data: No study data is mentioned, as is common for many 510(k) submissions of physical medical devices demonstrating substantial equivalence.

    If you have a document describing a performance study for an AI/software device, I would be happy to analyze it according to your prompt.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1