Search Results

The HotDog Temperature Management System is intended to prevent or treat hypothermia and to provide warmth to patients. The System should be used in circumstances in which patients may not maintain a state of normothermia. The System can be used with adult patients.

The System is intended primarily for use in hospital centers including, without limitation, operating rooms, recovery rooms, emergency rooms, burn units and on other medical/surgical floors.

The HotDog Return Electrode Mattress is intended to conduct monopolar electrosurgical energy from the target tissue of a patient back to one electrosurgical unit (ESU) or generator in monopolar surgery. The HotDog Return Electrode Mattress is restricted to use with isolated monopolar electrosurgical generators. The Hotdog Return Electrode Mattress is intended for use with adult patients only.

The HotDog Warming Mattress + Return Electrode (“Mattress”) is part of a thermal regulating system, indicated for controlling patient temperature in adult patients.

Mattresses utilize a flexible semi-conductive polymer fabric which warms the patient effectively within safe limits (controlled temperature, low watt density, low thermal mass) from a controller and sensor feedback loop. They are RF sealed in durable urethane shells designed to eliminate uncleanable crevices. Via a blue cable, they are powered with a low voltage floating isolated DC current, designed to safely operate in the most demanding clinical settings.

Mattresses contain a green cable which enables the mattress to function as a capacitive return electrode for electrosurgery.

The provided document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification summary for the HotDog Warming Mattress + Return Electrode. This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than proving a device meets specific clinical performance acceptance criteria through the kind of studies typically discussed for AI/ML-based diagnostic devices (e.g., MRMC studies for image analysis).

Therefore, the requested information, particularly points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, which are standard for evaluating AI/ML algorithm performance for diagnostic purposes, are not applicable to this document. This submission primarily relies on bench testing, adherence to recognized consensus standards, and risk management to demonstrate safety and effectiveness.

Here's why many of your specific questions are not directly answered by this document:

• No AI/ML Algorithm: The device described is a physical warming mattress with an integrated return electrode. It's not an AI/ML diagnostic or predictive algorithm. Therefore, concepts like "test set," "training set," "ground truth experts," "adjudication," or "human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance" are not relevant.
• Focus on Substantial Equivalence: The 510(k) pathway requires demonstrating that a new device is as safe and effective as a legally marketed predicate device. This is often achieved through comparative testing of physical characteristics and performance against established standards, rather than clinical efficacy trials involving "ground truth" derived from expert consensus on images or pathology.

However, I can extract the relevant information regarding the performance claims and the studies/testing cited to support them, reframing the acceptance criteria in terms of the standards and tests performed.

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for HotDog Warming Mattress + Return Electrode

The "acceptance criteria" for this device are primarily defined by its compliance with recognized consensus standards for medical electrical equipment and specific standards for warming blankets/pads and high-frequency surgical accessories. The "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" refers to the bench testing and risk management activities conducted.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

For points 2-9, as this is a traditional medical device (not AI/ML software), these concepts are not applicable in the way they relate to AI model validation. However, I will address them where analogous information can be inferred from the document.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
* "Test Set" Analogue: For this device, the "test set" is the actual device (or representative samples) subjected to various bench tests. The document doesn't specify a numerical sample size for each test (e.g., how many warming mattresses were tested for electromagnetic compatibility).
* Data Provenance: The testing was conducted by Intertek, a recognized third-party testing laboratory. The document indicates validation on porcine tissue at the University of Minnesota's Visible Heart Laboratory. This suggests prospective, controlled laboratory/animal testing, rather than retrospective human clinical data.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications:
* This question is not applicable. The "ground truth" for a physical device like this is dictated by established engineering standards (e.g., specific voltage limits, temperature accuracy, current flow parameters) and material properties, rather than human expert interpretation of images or clinical outcomes that require medical consensus.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
* This is not applicable. Testing against engineering standards involves objective measurements and pass/fail criteria, not subjective human judgment requiring adjudication.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, and what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
* This is not applicable. This device is not an AI/ML diagnostic tool, and thus no MRMC study with human readers assisting AI was performed or is relevant.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
* This is not applicable. There is no AI algorithm to test in a standalone fashion. The "standalone" performance here refers to the device's functional tests (warming, electrosurgical return) in isolation and in combination. The testing confirmed that warming and return electrode functions perform as intended both independently and when integrated.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:
* The "ground truth" for this device's performance is objective measurement against industry-recognized consensus standards (e.g., IEC 60601 series, ISO 14971, IEC 62366-1) and internal design specifications, supplemented by animal model validation (porcine tissue) for the combined functionality. It's not based on expert clinical consensus or patient outcomes data in the way an AI diagnostic model would be.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:
* This is not applicable. This is a physical device, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a "training set."

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established:
* This is not applicable. As there is no training set for an AI/ML model, the concept of establishing ground truth for it does not apply.

Ask a specific question about this device