Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(145 days)
INBONE Total Ankle System (K193067)
The APEX 3D Total Ankle Replacement System is indicated as a total ankle replacement in primary surgery for patients with ankle joints damaged by severe rheumatoid, post-traumatic, or degenerative arthritis. Revision surgery for these patients is also indicated for patients with sufficient bone stock present. In the United States, components are intended for cemented use only.
The APEX 3D Total Ankle Replacement System is a cemented, fixed-bearing device comprised of a tibial component, a talar component, and a UHMWPE component used for ankle joint replacement. Based on patient anatomy, a number of component sizes and design configurations can be selected for best fit.
The provided document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device (APEX 3D Total Ankle Replacement System), which focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device. It addresses the device's indications for use, description, and the performance testing conducted to assure substantial equivalence.
However, the document does NOT contain information related to software or AI device performance, acceptance criteria, or ground truth establishment relevant to the questions asked about AI/software validation.
Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from the provided text. The document explicitly states:
- "Clinical data are not needed to support the safety and effectiveness of the subject device." This indicates that there was no clinical study, including any involving AI or human readers, performed for this submission.
- The tests listed are all non-clinical performance tests on the physical components of the ankle replacement system (e.g., fatigue, material characterization, micromotion, magnetic resonance compatibility). None of these involve software or AI performance metrics.
To answer your request, if this were an AI/software device submission, the acceptance criteria and study details would typically involve metrics like sensitivity, specificity, AUC, human reader performance studies (MRMC), ground truth assessment by experts, sample sizes for training and testing, and adjudication methods. None of this information is present in the provided document.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1