Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K221959
    Device Name
    Q21
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2023-08-31

    (422 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    882.1400
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K192753

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The NeuroField Q21 System is indicated for prescription use to acquire, record, transmit, and display physiological data for electroencephalographic (EEG) studies of patients of all ages.

    Device Description

    The Q21 is a 20-Channel Quantitative Electroencephalogram (QEEG) system which records 24-bit high resolution EEG data. NeuroField EEG is the main software which runs on a Windows-based computer/laptop where basic data is collected and controls the Q21. This software records the patient information and displays and stores the EEG. The Q21 system provides for typical EEG functions, including realtime EEG recording and viewing, adjustable vertical and horizontal display scale, adjustable highpass, lowpass, and notch filters, file import and export, offline review, the ability to show and hide individual channels, remontaging, and the ability to add event markers. The Q21 system supports both individual electrodes and standard 19-channel Electrocap electrode arrays. Each Q21 system consists of an amplifier, software, and components of a standard personal computer (monitor, keyboard, and mouse). The Q21 amplifier is a 19+1 channel, 24-bit, low-noise, non-multiplexed, battery-powered, optically-isolated amplifier. The "+1" channel can be used as an auxiliary physiological channel.

    AI/ML Overview
    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
    Feature/ParameterAcceptance Criteria (Predicate: Cadwell Apollo System, K201819)Reported Device Performance (NeuroField Q21)
    Regulatory Parameters
    Indications for UsePrescription use for EEG and PSG studies, all agesPrescription use for EEG studies, all ages
    Intended PopulationPatients of all agesPatients of all ages
    Common/Usual NameEEGEEG
    Regulatory ClassClass IIClass II
    Classification Name/Product Code882.1400 Electroencephalograph, GWQ882.1400 Electroencephalograph, GWQ
    Software Features
    Realtime EEG recording/viewingYesYes
    Adjustable display scaleYesYes
    Adjustable filtersYes (highpass, lowpass, notch)Yes (highpass, lowpass, notch)
    File import/offline reviewYesYes
    File export/sharingYes (EDF)Yes (EDF, XDF)
    Show/Hide individual channelsYesYes
    RemontagingYesYes
    Ability to add event markersYesYes
    Video recordingYesNo
    Hardware Features
    Maximum number of channels3220
    Individual electrode supportYesYes
    Electrocap supportYesYes
    Input dynamic range> ± 300 mV± 375 mV
    A/D resolution16 bit24 bit
    Sampling rateUp to 2300 Hz256 Hz
    Notch filter50 Hz and 60 Hz50 Hz and 60 Hz
    Input impedance20 GΩ>1000 GΩ
    CMRR>110dB>110dB
    Noise level2500 V>2500 V
    Digital interfaceEthernetCANBus
    Power supplyLi-Ion BatteryLi-Ion Battery
    Non-Clinical Performance StandardsCompliance with specific standardsCompliance with specific standards
    - ANSI AAMI ES60601-1:2005/(R)2012 and A1:2012, C1:2009/(R)2012 and A2:2010/(R)2012 (Consolidated Text)YesYes
    - IEC 60601-1-2:2014+A1:2020YesYes
    - IEC 80601-2-26:2019YesYes
    Software Verification & ValidationFollow FDA guidance for "moderate" level of concernFollow FDA guidance for "moderate" level of concern
    1. Sample Size used for the test set and the data provenance:

      • The provided document does not specify a test set sample size for "performance" testing in the traditional sense of a clinical or retrospective data study.
      • Instead, the "testing" for this device focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device based on features and compliance with non-clinical performance standards. There is no indication of a dataset of patient EEG recordings being used as a test set for performance evaluation.
      • Data Provenance: Not applicable as no specific test set data (e.g., patient EEG recordings) was described for performance evaluation.
    2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

      • Not applicable. The document does not describe a study involving expert-established ground truth for a test set of EEG recordings. The evaluation is based on technical specifications and compliance with recognized standards compared to predicate devices.
    3. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

      • Not applicable. There was no test set requiring ground truth adjudication by experts for performance evaluation.
    4. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

      • No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done. The device is an Electroencephalograph (EEG) system for acquiring, recording, transmitting, and displaying physiological data, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool for human readers.
    5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

      • Not applicable. The device itself is an EEG system; it is not an algorithm designed for standalone performance analysis described in the context of diagnostic interpretation. Its "performance" refers to its ability to accurately acquire and display EEG signals.
    6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc):

      • Not applicable. For this type of device (an EEG system), the "ground truth" for proving its functionality typically involves calibrated input signals and adherence to industry standards for electrical performance, rather than clinical ground truth like pathology or expert consensus on disease. The document states the device meets the requirements of specific external standards and underwent software verification and validation testing, which serve as the basis for demonstrating its functional performance.
    7. The sample size for the training set:

      • Not applicable. The document does not describe a training set in the context of machine learning or AI. The EEG system itself is a data acquisition and display device, not an AI model that requires a training set.
    8. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

      • Not applicable, as no training set was described.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1