Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K213010
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2023-05-31

    (618 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.5860
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K192551

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    FEELject LDV(Low dead volume) Syringe is intended for use to inject fluid into or withdraw fluids from the parts of body below the surface of the skin.

    Device Description

    A Disposable Syringe with Needle is a device intended for medical purposes that consists of a calibrated hollow barrel and a movable plunger. At one end of the barrel there is a hypodermic single lumen needle which is permanently attached. The device is used to inject fluids into, or withdraw fluids from, the body. It is made of plastic and silicone materials that allows for smooth plunger movement, and manually operated. This is a single-use device. This product is packed by sterile paper and sterilized by E.O gas.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the 510(k) summary for the FEELject LDV (Low dead volume) Syringe, a medical device. This document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than proving a new medical device meets specific acceptance criteria through a clinical study or AI performance evaluation.

    Therefore, the information required to answer your specific questions about acceptance criteria, AI performance, ground truth establishment, sample sizes for training/test sets, expert adjudication, or MRMC studies for an AI/device is not available in this document.

    The document discusses bench testing and biocompatibility testing to show that the device performs in a substantially equivalent manner to the predicate device. These tests demonstrate the physical and biological properties of the syringe, not the performance of an AI algorithm or a diagnostic device.

    Here's a breakdown of what can be extracted from the document, and why the other requested information is absent:


    Information Available from the Document:

    This document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device (syringe), not an AI algorithm. Therefore, the requested information about AI-related acceptance criteria, study design (MRMC, standalone), ground truth establishment for AI, and sample sizes for AI training/test sets is not applicable and not found in this text.

    The closest equivalent to "acceptance criteria" here is compliance with ISO standards and passing various bench tests and biocompatibility tests to show substantial equivalence to the predicate device.

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    While not "AI performance" criteria, the document lists various requirements/tests for the syringe and their results (Pass). These serve as the "acceptance criteria" for the syringe's physical and biological properties.

    Requirement - Test (ISO 7886-1)Reported Device Performance (Result)
    Limits for extractable metalsPass
    GeneralPass
    Limits for acidity or alkalinityPass
    Conical fittingPass
    Position of nozzle on end of barrelPass
    Tolerance on graduated capacityPass
    ScalePass
    Numbering of scalesPass
    Overall length of scale to nominal capacity linePass
    Position of scalePass
    Barrel flangesPass
    Plunger stopper/plunger assemblyPass
    Dead spacePass
    Freedom from air and liquid leakage past plunger stopperPass
    Force to operate the pistonPass
    Fit of plunger stopper/plunger in barrelPass
    Unit packaging and self-contained syringe unitsPass
    Quantity of silicone oilPass
    Requirement - Test (ISO 7864)Reported Device Performance (Result)
    CleanlinessPass
    Tolerances on lengthPass
    Needle Point, needles with sharp tip onlyPass
    Bond between hub and needle tubePass
    Patency lumenPass
    Requirement – Test (ISO 9626)Reported Device Performance (Result)
    StiffnessPass
    Resistance to breakagePass
    Resistance to corrosionPass
    Requirement - Test (USP 788)Reported Device Performance (Result)
    Particulate matter injectionsPass
    Biocompatibility Test ItemTest Method / Test CriteriaReported Device Performance (Result)
    CytotoxicityISO 10993-5 Tests for in vitro cytotoxicityPass
    Skin Sensitization TestISO 10993-10 irritation and skin sensitizationPass
    Intracutaneous Reactivity TestISO 10993-10 Test for irritation and skin sensitization, maximization test for delayed hypersensitivityPass
    Acute Systemic Toxicity TestISO 10993-11 Test for systemic toxicity - Acute Systemic ToxicityPass
    Pyrogen TestISO 10993-11 Tests for systemic toxicity, Annex(F) Information on material-mediated pyrogens.Pass
    Hemolysis TestISO 10993-4 Selection of tests for interactions with bloodPass
    Sterility and LAL Test ItemTest StandardReported Device Performance (Result)
    LAL test (Bacterial Endotoxins)USP39 (Unit : EU/Device)Pass
    Sterility testAccording to ISO 11737-2Pass
    E.O ResidualUnder the conditions of ISO 10993-7:2008, Ethylene oxide sterilization residualsPass

    Information Not Applicable or Not Present:

    The following information is specifically requested for AI/Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) performance studies, which are not described in this 510(k) summary for a physical medical device (syringe). Therefore, the answers are "Not Applicable" or "Not Provided" in this context.

    • 2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. The tests are bench tests of physical characteristics, not data-driven AI test sets with specific sample sizes from a clinical population.
    • 3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. Ground truth for an AI algorithm is not established for a physical syringe.
    • 4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable. This is for AI performance evaluation.
    • 5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This is for AI performance evaluation.
    • 6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This is for AI performance evaluation. The device is a physical syringe.
    • 7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): Not applicable. This is for AI performance evaluation. The "ground truth" for the syringe is its compliance with specified physical and biological standards.
    • 8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. There is no AI training set for a syringe.
    • 9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable. There is no AI training set for a syringe.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1