Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(224 days)
The SteriKing® LT Blueline with Tyvek® pouches are intended to provide health care workers with an effective method to enclose devices intended for sterilization in the STERRAD® Sterilizer Systems.
The device is intended to allow sterilization of enclosed devices and to maintain sterility of the enclosed devices until used up to 3 years post sterilization. The products are for single use only.
The SteriKing® LT Blueline with Tyvek® pouches are intended for use in the following STERRAD® Sterilization Cycles:
NX Standard
NX Advanced
100NX Duo
100NX Flex
100NX Standard
Max weights:
NX Standard Cycle:
75 mm x 200 mm, 100 mm x 250 mm x 300 mm, 160 mm x 440 mm x 600 mm . 088 pounds
205 mm x 390 mm, 250 mm x 390 mm, 250 mm x 500 mm: 1.382 pounds
NX Advanced Cycle:
75 mm x 200 mm, 100 mm x 250 mm x 300 mm, 160 mm x 440 mm x 600 mm . 084 pounds
205 mm x 390 mm, 250 mm x 390 mm, 250 mm x 500 mm: 1.393 pounds
100NX Duo Cycle:
75 mm x 200 mm, 100 mm x 250 mm x 300 mm, 160 mm x 440 mm x 600 mm : 104 pounds
205 mm x 390 mm, 250 mm x 390 mm, 250 mm x 500 mm: 1.400 pounds
100NX Flex Cycle:
75 mm x 200 mm, 100 mm x 250 mm x 300 mm, 160 mm x 440 mm, 160 mm x 600 mm: .158 pounds
205 mm x 390 mm, 250 mm x 390 mm, 250 mm x 500 mm: 1.400 pounds
100NX Standard Cycle:
75 mm x 200 mm, 100 mm x 250 mm x 300 mm, 160 mm x 440 mm x 600 mm: .158 pounds
205 mm x 390 mm, 250 mm x 390 mm, 250 mm x 500 mm: 4.476 pounds
Max lumens:
1 mm min ID and 1 max lumen for all cycles
NX Standard Cycle: For pouch sizes 250x500mm, 205x390mm is 125 mm max length. Max length is 50 mm for all other pouch sizes.
NX Advanced Cycle: For pouch sizes 250x500mm, 205x390mm is 125 mm max length is 50 mm for all other pouch sizes.
100NX Duo Cycle: For pouch sizes 250x500mm, 250x390mm is 875 mm max length. Max length is 850 mm for all other pouch sizes.
100NX Flex Cycle: Max length is 850 mm for all pouch sizes.
100NX Standard Cycle: For pouch sizes 250x500mm, 205x390mm is 125 mm max length, Max length is 50 mm for all other pouch sizes.
Pouch Sizes:
250 mm x 500 mm
250 mm x 390 mm
205 mm x 390 mm
160 mm x 600 mm
160 mm x 440 mm
150 mm x 300 mm
100 mm x 250 mm
75 mm x 200 mm
Steriking® LT-Blueline Pouches with Tyvek® are intended to be used to contain medical devices to be terminally sterilized in the STERRAD® Sterilization System. The medical devices are inserted into the Pouch, sealed, and then sterilized in the STERRAD® Sterilization System. Sterilization Cycles are noted below. After completion of the sterilization process, the Pouch maintains sterility of the enclosed medical devices until the seal is opened. These pouches are made from a plastic film and Tyvek that is heat-sealed on three sides. The fourth side is left opened and will be heat-sealed when used.
Steriking® LT-Blueline Pouches with Tyvek® are intended to allow sterilization of enclosed devices and to maintain sterility of the enclosed devices until used up to 3 years post sterilization. The products are for single use only.
The pouches are constructed from Tyvek®/plastic films. The heat-sealed pouches are heat sealed prior to processing in the STERRAD® Sterilization Systems.
Sterilization Systems:
STERRAD® Cycles:
NX Standard
NX Advanced
100NX Duo
100NX Flex
100NX Standard
This document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the FDA, and as such, it describes the non-clinical testing performed for a medical device (sterilization pouches), rather than an AI-powered software device. Therefore, many of the requested elements for describing an AI study (e.g., sample size for test/training sets, expert ground truth, MRMC studies) are not applicable in this context.
However, I can extract the information related to the acceptance criteria and the studies that prove the device meets these criteria, focusing on the traditional medical device testing rather than AI performance.
Here's the breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study findings for the SteriKing® LT-Blueline Pouches with Tyvek®:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
Test Methodology | Purpose | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|---|
ISO 10993-5 Biological Evaluation of medical devices - Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity | Biocompatibility | No reduction of cell growth or cell lysis was observed | Pass |
AAMI TIR12:2010 - Designing, testing, and labeling reusable medical devices for reprocessing in health care facilities | Sterilant Penetration | Demonstrating that a minimum of 1.0x10^6 Geobacilus stearothermophilus spores were killed in a half-cycle (6-log reduction) | Pass |
ASTM F1929-15: Standard test method for detecting seal leaks in porous medical packaging by dye migration | Package Integrity | Dye Penetration: none | Pass |
ANSI/AAMI ST79:2017 - Comprehensive guide to steam sterilization and sterility assurance in health care facilities, AAMI TIR12:2010 | Microbial Barrier Properties | A sample which demonstrates that all items remain sterile following exposure | Pass (No growth in culture tubes containing stainless-steel coupons after incubation) |
ASTM F1929-15: Standard test method for detecting seal leaks in porous medical packaging by dye migration, ASTM F88: Standard Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier Materials | Shelf Life Pre Sterilization | Dye Penetration: none, Seal peel: =>1.5N/15mm | Pass |
ASTM F1980 – 16 Standard Guide for Accelerated Aging of Sterile Barrier Systems for Medical Devices, ASTM F1929-15, ASTM F88 | Shelf Life Post Sterilization | Dye Penetration: none, Seal peel: =>1.5N/15mm | Pass |
Various ASTM/ISO/TAPPI standards (F1608, F2638, D3776, D2724, T460, 1924-2, D1424, 534, 5636-3, T523, 2758, D3420) | Material Compatibility | Meets specifications per Technical Data Sheets. | Pass |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document does not explicitly state numerical sample sizes for each test. However, it mentions "test samples" and "stainless-steel coupons" were used. The data provenance is based on lab testing of the device itself, likely conducted by the manufacturer (Wipak Oy in Finland) for submission to the FDA. The tests are non-clinical (laboratory-based) rather than retrospective or prospective human data.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
This is not applicable as the testing involves physical and biological properties of a medical device (sterilization pouches), not an AI model requiring human expert interpretation for ground truth. Ground truth is established through adherence to recognized international standards and documented laboratory methods (e.g., measuring direct physical properties, culturing for microbial growth, assessing cytotoxicity).
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. This is not a human interpretation study. The results are based on objective measurement against predefined standards.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This is not an AI-powered device or a study involving human readers.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is not an AI algorithm. Its performance is evaluated through its physical and biological integrity and functionality.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
The ground truth for this device is based on:
- Compliance with recognized international and national standards: e.g., ISO 10993-5 (Biocompatibility), AAMI TIR12:2010 (Sterilant Penetration, Microbial Barrier), ASTM F1929-15 (Seal Leaks, Dye Migration), ASTM F88 (Seal Strength), ASTM F1980 (Accelerated Aging).
- Objective laboratory measurements: Such as absence of cell growth/lysis, 6-log reduction in spores, absence of dye penetration, specified seal strength values, and "no growth in any of the culture tubes."
- Performance specifications: Material compatibility against technical data sheets.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. There is no training set as this is not an AI or machine learning model.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. There is no training set for this type of medical device.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1