Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(521 days)
The Visby Medical Sexual Health Click Test is a single-use (disposable), fully-integrated, automated Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in vitro diagnostic test intended for use in point of-care or clinical laboratory settings for the rapid detection and differentiation of DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis in seff-collected female vaginal swab specimens using the Visby Medical Sexual Health Vaginal Specimen Collection Kit in a health care setting. The test results are to aid in the diagnosis of symptomatic infections with Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis.
The test system includes the Visby Medical Sexual Health Click device, the Visby Medical power supply, the Visby Medical Vaginal Collection kit, and fixed-volume transfer pipettes. The device processes a vaginal swab sample by automatically performing all steps required to complete lysis, polymerase chain reaction, and amplicon detection.
The patient uses the Visby Medical Vaginal Collection Kit to self-collect a vaginal specimen with the provided flocked swab, and then the patient elutes the specimen into the Visby Medical Collection Media. The test operator transfers the collection media containing the patient specimen into the sample port of the device using the provided fixed-volume pipette where it rehydrates a lyophilized internal process control. The sample enters a lysis module, where the DNA of the sample and the internal process control are extracted using a combination of chemical lysis and high temperature. The extracted DNA enters a mixing chamber where it rehydrated lyophilized PCR reagents, followed by thermocycling to amplify target DNA. If present, the amplified pathogen target (CT, NG, and/or TV) and internal process control hybridize to specific probes located on a flow channel. Detection of the target-specific PCR product is accomplished via an enzyme-linked colorimetric assay using streptavidin bound horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and a colorimetric substrate that forms a purple precipitate. Test results can be expected in approximately 30 minutes: a green check mark will appear, and a purple color will appear in the "Control" spot, indicating a valid test. A purple spot adjacent to "Chlamydia," "Gonorrhoeae," and/or "Trichomonas" signifies the presence of amplified CT, NG, and/or TV DNA in the sample. Tests with invalid results due to an error (indicated by a red X status light) or failure to develop a purple spot in the "Control" spot, are retested with a new Visby device.
The Visby Medical Sexual Health Click Test is an automated Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in vitro diagnostic test for the rapid detection and differentiation of DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) in self-collected female vaginal swab specimens.
Here's an analysis of its acceptance criteria and the study that proves its performance:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria are implicitly defined by the clinical performance observed in the study, aiming for high sensitivity and specificity. The reported device performance is based on the achieved Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) and Negative Percent Agreement (NPA) or Sensitivity and Specificity against a Composite Comparator Result (CCR) or Patient Infected Status (PIS).
Target Organism | Performance Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implicit) | Reported Device Performance (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|
Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) | Overall PPA | High (e.g., >90%) | 97.4% (93.5-99.0%) |
Overall NPA | High (e.g., >90%) | 97.8% (96.9-98.4%) | |
Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) | Overall PPA | High (e.g., >90%) | 97.8% (88.4-99.6%) |
Overall NPA | High (e.g., >90%) | 99.1% (98.5-99.4%) | |
Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) | Overall Sensitivity | High (e.g., >90%) | 99.3% (96.0-99.9%) |
Overall Specificity | High (e.g., >90%) | 96.7% (95.8-97.5%) |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Test Set Sample Size:
- CT: 1774 subjects
- NG: 1786 subjects
- TV: 1765 subjects
- Initially, 1899 subjects were enrolled, 1881 were eligible, and 1789 were included in the data analysis.
- Data Provenance: The study was conducted at 14 clinical sites geographically distributed across the United States. The study subjects were prospectively enrolled females.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Their Qualifications
- The document does not specify the number of experts explicitly used to establish the ground truth.
- The ground truth was established by a Composite Comparator Result (CCR) for CT and NG, and a Patient Infected Status (PIS) algorithm for TV, which were comprised of three FDA-cleared NAAT assays.
- The qualifications of the individuals interpreting the results of these FDA-cleared NAAT assays are not explicitly stated, but it can be inferred that they would be trained laboratory personnel given the nature of NAAT testing.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Adjudication Method: For all three organisms (CT, NG, TV), the ground truth (CCR/PIS) was determined as follows:
- A study participant was considered infected if a positive result was reported from two of the three FDA-cleared NAAT tests.
- If the test results of the first two NAATs were discordant (one positive, one negative), the CCR/PIS was determined by the third NAAT. This is often referred to as a "2 out of 3" or "tie-breaker" adjudication method.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
- No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done in the context of human readers improving with or without AI assistance. This device is a fully-automated in vitro diagnostic test, and the clinical study evaluated the device's performance directly against a laboratory-based ground truth, not human reader performance.
- However, a reproducibility study was conducted with "untrained users" (non-laboratorians) in CLIA waived settings, to assess the device's performance when used by typical healthcare professionals in such environments. This indirectly assesses the device's usability and reliability in a real-world setting where "human readers" (the operators) process samples and interpret simple visual results (green check mark for valid, purple spots for positive). The study demonstrated robust reproducibility and that untrained users could perform and interpret results accurately, but it wasn't a comparative effectiveness study of human reader improvement.
6. Standalone Performance Study (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance)
- Yes, the clinical performance described in section H is a standalone performance study (device only without human-in-the-loop performance influencing the result generation). The device processes a vaginal swab sample fully-integrated and automatically, performing lysis, PCR, and amplicon detection, and then provides a visual result (a green check mark for valid and purple spots for positive). The study evaluated how this automated device's results compared to the established ground truth.
- While human operators handled the samples and initiated the test, the test interpretation is designed to be straightforward and automatic (visual detection of colored spots), making the clinical performance metrics largely reflective of the algorithm's standalone capability to detect the presence of pathogens. The reproducibility study explicitly confirmed that "untrained users can perform the test and interpret the results accurately."
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
- The ground truth used was a Composite Comparator Result (CCR) for CT and NG, and a Patient Infected Status (PIS) algorithm for TV.
- This ground truth was derived from the results of three FDA-cleared NAAT (Nucleic Acid Amplification Test) assays. This is a common and robust method for establishing ground truth in molecular diagnostics, as NAATs are highly sensitive and specific.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
- The document focuses on the validation of the device through non-clinical and clinical studies. It does not specify the sample size for a training set.
- As an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) device, its development likely involves extensive internal optimization and testing (which could be considered analogous to "training" in the context of AI/ML, though this device is PCR-based with colorimetric detection, not explicitly a machine learning algorithm) using characterized samples and analytical performance studies (Limit of Detection, Inclusivity, Cross-Reactivity, etc.). These analytical studies serve as a rigorous "training" and development phase, but specific "training set sizes" as might be reported for a machine learning model are not applicable or provided here.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- Since a specific "training set" with established ground truth as in AI/ML model development is not explicitly mentioned or applicable to this type of PCR-based diagnostic, this question cannot be directly answered from the provided text.
- However, the analytical studies (LoD, Inclusivity, Cross-Reactivity, Competitive Interference, Interfering Substances, Reproducibility) described in section G involve using well-characterized organisms (known strains/serovars with specified concentrations) spiked into negative clinical vaginal sample matrix. The "ground truth" for these analytical samples is the known presence/absence and concentration of the spiked organisms. This rigorous analytical characterization serves to ensure the robust performance of the assay.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1