Search Results

The Smith & Nephew Tablet Application is indicated for wireless control of compatible Smith & Nephew passive surgical and endoscopic devices including camera control unit and patient information system.

The Tablet Application acts as a tool to remotely capture still and motion pictures, patient file management, and limited redundant control of medical devices. The Tablet Application currently supports the LENS Integrated System and Integration Broker.

The provided text describes the Smith & Nephew Tablet Application, which is indicated for wireless control of compatible Smith & Nephew passive surgical and endoscopic devices, including camera control units and patient information systems.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The text does not explicitly state specific quantitative acceptance criteria or detailed device performance metrics. It generally states that "Testing demonstrated that the Tablet Application has met the performance specifications" and "met all specified criteria."

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The document does not provide details on the sample size used for the test set or the data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective). It only mentions "Software Verification and Validation" was conducted.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

This information is not provided in the document.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

This information is not provided in the document.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

The document does not mention an MRMC comparative effectiveness study, nor does it discuss an effect size of human readers improving with AI vs. without AI assistance. The device is for controlling surgical and endoscopic devices, not for diagnostic interpretation by human readers.

6. Standalone Performance Study

The document indicates that "Software Verification and Validation" was conducted, which implies evaluation of the algorithm's performance in a standalone context to ensure it meets its specifications. However, specific details of this standalone performance are not enumerated beyond the general statement of meeting criteria.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

The document does not specify the type of ground truth used. For a device intended for wireless control, the "ground truth" would likely involve objective measures of functionality, such as successful command execution, accurate data transfer, proper control of connected devices, and adherence to communication protocols, rather than expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data typically associated with diagnostic or prognostic devices.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

This information is not provided in the document. The device is a software application for control, so a "training set" in the machine learning sense may not be directly applicable, or if it involves configuration data, its size is not mentioned.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

This information is not provided in the document. As noted above, the concept of a "training set" might not be relevant in a conventional sense for this type of device. If there was a training phase for any adaptable components of the software, the method for establishing ground truth for that phase is not given.

Ask a specific question about this device