Search Results

The Venue Fit is a general purpose diagnostic ultrasound system for use by qualified and trained healthcare professionals for ultrasound imaging, measurement, display and analysis of the human body and fluid. Venue Fit is intended to be used in a hospital or medical clinic. Venue Fit clinical applications include: abdominal (GYN and Urology), thoracic/pleural, ophthalmic, Fetal/OB, Small Organ (including breast, thyroid), VascularPeripheral vascular, neonatal and adult cephalic, pediatric, musculoskeletal (conventional and superficial), cardiac (adults and pediatric), Transrectal, Transvaginal, Transesophageal, Intraoperative (vascular) and interventional guidance (includes tissue biopsy, fluid drainage, vascular and non-vascular access). Modes of operation include: B, M, PW Doppler, Color Doppler, Color M Doppler, Power Doppler, Harmonic Imaging, Coded Pulse and Combined modes: B/M, B/Color M, B/PWD, B/Color/PWD, B/Power/PWD, B/CWD, B/Color/CWD.

Venue Fit is a general-purpose diagnostic ultrasound system intended for use by qualified and trained healthcare professionals to evaluate the body by ultrasound imaging and fluid flow analysis. The Venue Fit is a compact, portable system with a small footprint. The system can be hand carried using the integrated handle, placed on a horizontal surface (if kickstand is attached), attached to a mobile cart or mounted on the wall. It has a high resolution color LCD monitor, with a simple, multi-touch user interface that makes the system intuitive. The system can be powered through an electrical wall outlet for long term use or from an internal battery for a short time with full functionality and scanning.

The Venue Fit utilizes a variety of linear, convex, and phased array transducers which provide high imaging capability. supporting all standard acquisition modes. Some transducers are compatible with OEM biopsy kits to support needle-guidance procedures.

The system has the capability for displaying the patient's ECG trace synchronized to the scanned image. This allows the user to view an image from a specific time of the ECG signal. The ECG signal can be input directly from the patient leads or as an output from an ECG monitoring device. ECG information is not intended for monitoring or diagnosis.

Venue Fit is capable of wired or wireless internet connection and a barcode reader is available to be used as an input device. The system meets DICOM requirements to support users image storage and archiving needs (local PACS or products such as O-Path) and allows for output to printing devices. The user documentation is available electronically. An additional accessory available for the customer is a roller bag.

I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain the information required to answer your request. The document is a 510(k) premarket notification submission for a medical device (Venue Fit ultrasound system).

It primarily focuses on:

• Regulatory information: FDA letter, indications for use, and a 510(k) summary.
• Device description: Explaining the Venue Fit's features, intended use, and technical specifications.
• Comparison to predicate devices: Highlighting similarities and differences with previously cleared GE ultrasound systems.
• Non-clinical tests: Listing the safety and performance standards the device complies with (e.g., acoustic output, biocompatibility, electrical safety).
• A statement explicitly saying: "The subject of this premarket submission, Venue Fit, did not require clinical studies to support substantial equivalence."

Therefore, there is no information regarding:

• Acceptance criteria for AI/algorithm performance.
• Results of a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria (as no clinical studies were required).
• Sample sizes for test or training sets.
• Data provenance.
• Number of experts, their qualifications, or adjudication methods for ground truth.
• MRMC studies or effect sizes.
• Standalone algorithm performance.
• Type of ground truth used.
• How ground truth for training was established.

This document indicates that the device's substantial equivalence was demonstrated through non-clinical testing and comparison to predicate devices, rather than a clinical study involving AI performance metrics.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Venue Go is a general purpose diagnostic ultrasound system for use by qualified and trained healthcare professionals for ultrasound imaging, measurement, display and analysis of the human body and fluid. Venue Go is intended to be used in a hospital or medical clinic. Venue Go clinical applications include: abdominal (GYN and Urology), thoracic/pleural, ophthalmic, Fetal/OB, Small Organ (including breast, thyroid), VascularPeripheral vascular, neonatal and adult cephalic, pediatric, musculoskeletal (conventional and superficial), cardiac (adults and pediatric), Transrectal, Transvaginal, Transesophageal, Intraoperative (vascular) and interventional guidance (includes tissue biopsy, fluid drainage, vascular and non-vascular access). Modes of operation include: B, M, PW Doppler, Color Doppler, Color M Doppler, Power Doppler, Harmonic Imaging, Coded Pulse and Combined modes: B/M, B/Color M, B/ PWD, B/Color/PWD, B/Power/PWD, B/CWD, B/Color/CWD.

Venue Go is a general-purpose diagnostic ultrasound system intended for use by qualified and trained healthcare professionals to evaluate the body by ultrasound imaging and fluid flow analysis. The Venue Go is a compact, portable system with a small footprint The system can be hand carried using an integrated handle, placed on a horizontal surface, attached to a mobile cart or wall mounted. It has a high resolution color LCD monitor, with a simple, multi-touch user interface that makes the system intuitive. The system can be powered through an electrical wall outlet for long term use or from an internal battery for a short time.

The Venue Go utilizes a variety of linear, convex, and phased array transducers which provide high imaging capability, supporting all standard acquisition modes. Some transducers are compatible with OEM biopsy kits to support needle-guidance procedures.

The system has the capability for displaying the patient's ECG trace synchronized to the scanned image. This allows the user to view an image from a specific time of the ECG signal. The ECG signal can be input directly from the patient leads or as an output from an ECG monitoring device. ECG information is not intended for monitoring or diagnosis.

A barcode reader is available to be used as an input device. Venue Go is capable of wireless communication through a builtin Wireless LAN device. The system meets DICOM requirements to support users image storage and archiving needs (local PACS or products such as O-Path) and allows for output to printing devices. The user documentation is available electronically. An additional accessory that will also be available for the customer will be a roller bag.

The provided text describes the GE Medical Systems Ultrasound and Primary Care Diagnostics' Venue Go device and its 510(k) premarket notification. However, it does not include information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria, as typically understood in the context of diagnostic performance (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy).

Instead, the document details the device's technical specifications, intended use, comparison to predicate devices, and compliance with non-clinical safety standards (acoustic output, biocompatibility, electrical safety, etc.). The "Summary of Non-Clinical Tests" section outlines various standards the device complies with, but these are safety and engineering standards, not performance criteria for a diagnostic algorithm.

Specifically, the "Summary of Clinical Tests" section explicitly states: "The subject of this premarket submission, Venue Go, did not require clinical studies to support substantial equivalence." This means that no clinical performance study was conducted to establish diagnostic accuracy metrics for the device itself. The substantial equivalence argument is based on its similarity to existing, legally marketed ultrasound systems.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving their fulfillment, as it is not present in the provided text.

If you have a document that describes the diagnostic performance claims and supporting studies for the Venue Go or a similar medical device, please provide that text, and I will be able to answer your questions.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Venue is a general purpose diagnostic ultrasound system for use by qualified and trained healthcare professionals for ultrasound imaging, measurement, display and analysis of the human body and fluid. Venue is intended to be used in a hospital or medical clinic. Venue clinical applications include: abdominal (GYN and Urology), thoracic/pleural, ophthalmic, Fetal/OB, Small Organ (including breast, testes, thyroid), VascularPeripheral vascular, neonatal and adult cephalic, pediatric, musculoskeletal (conventional and superficial), cardiac (adults and pediatric), Transrectal, Transvaginal, Transesophageal, Intraoperative (vascular) and interventional guidance (includes tissue biopsy, fluid drainage, vascular and non-vascular access). Modes of operation include: B, M, PW Doppler, Color Doppler, Color M Doppler, Power Doppler, Harmonic Imaging, Coded Pulse and Combined modes: B/M, B/Color M, B/ PWD, B/Color/PWD, B/Power/PWD, B/CWD, B/Color/CWD.

The proposed Venue system is a general-purpose, Track 3, diagnostic ultrasound device, intended for ultrasound imaging, measurement and analysis of the human body and fluid that provides digital acquisition, processing and display capabilities. Venue can be used in offices, clinics and hospitals. The Venue is a mobile system with a small footprint that easily fits into tight spaces and positioned to accommodate the sometimes-awkward work settings of the point of care user. The Venue has a high resolution color LCD monitor, with a simple, multi-touch user interface that makes the system intuitive. The single surface screen provides easy cleanability. Articulated monitor arm enables flexible display positions in order to be accessible and clearly visible in both user-standing and sitting positions.

The proposed Venue has the capability for displaying the patient's ECG trace synchronized to the scanned image. This allows the user to view an image from a specific time of the ECG signal. The ECG signal can be input directly from the patient leads or as an output from an ECG monitoring device. ECG is not intended for monitoring or diagnosis.

The Venue has a battery that allows for scanning without the need to plug in to an electrical outlet. The system is capable of wireless communication and a barcode reader is available to be used as an input device. System meets DICOM requirements to support users image storage and archiving needs and allows for output to printing devices. The user documentation is available via electronic media.

The Venue utilizes a variety of linear, convex, and phased array transducers which provide high imaging capability, supporting all standard acquisition modes. Some transducers are compatible with OEM biopsy kits to support needle-guidance procedures. The system includes several automated tools designed to simplify and shorten the workflow time of the healthcare professional for some common assessments.

Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The provided FDA 510(k) summary does not contain specific acceptance criteria or quantitative performance metrics for the device itself. Instead, the submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device by comparing:

• Clinical Indications for Use: Similar, with some additions cleared on reference devices.
• Technological Characteristics: Same fundamental scientific technology.
• Safety and Effectiveness: Assessed through non-clinical tests.
• Imaging Modes and Transducers: Largely identical or similar, with additions cleared on reference devices.
• Features/Functionality: Modifications or additions that are similar to features already cleared on predicate or reference devices.

Therefore, a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance, as typically understood for AI/ML device performance, cannot be constructed from this document. The "performance" being demonstrated here is the device's adherence to safety standards and its functional equivalence to existing cleared devices.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The document explicitly states: "The subject of this premarket submission, Venue, did not require clinical studies to support substantial equivalence."

Therefore, there was no test set as part of a clinical study for this 510(k) submission, and consequently, no sample size or data provenance information.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

As no clinical study was required and no test set was used, this information is not applicable and not provided in the document.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

As no clinical study was required and no test set was used, this information is not applicable and not provided in the document.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

The document explicitly states: "The subject of this premarket submission, Venue, did not require clinical studies to support substantial equivalence."

Therefore, no MRMC study was performed, and this information is not applicable and not provided in the document. The device descriptions focus on general ultrasound functionalities without specific mention of AI-assisted diagnostic features that would warrant such a study. While some "automated tools" are mentioned, their performance is established through similarity to pre-cleared features, not through comparative effectiveness studies in this submission.

6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

The document states: "The subject of this premarket submission, Venue, did not require clinical studies to support substantial equivalence."

Therefore, no standalone performance study was done for this submission, and this information is not applicable and not provided in the document.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

As no clinical study was required and no test set was used, this information is not applicable and not provided in the document. The substantial equivalence argument relies on comparison to predicate and reference devices, not on direct ground truth validation in a clinical setting for this specific submission.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

The document explicitly states: "The subject of this premarket submission, Venue, did not require clinical studies to support substantial equivalence."

Since no clinical studies were performed, and the submission does not describe the development or training of new AI/ML algorithms requiring a training set, this information is not applicable and not provided in the document. The "automated tools" mentioned are described as modifications or similar to features already cleared on other devices.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

As no training set was used for a clinical study in this submission, this information is not applicable and not provided in the document.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Vivid iq is a high-performance compact ultrasound system designed for cardiovascular and shared services applications. The indications of the product will include Fetal, OB, Abdominal, Pediatric, small Organ, Neonatal Cephalic, Adult Cephalic, Cardiac, Peripheral Vascular, Musculo-skeletal Conventional, Musculo-skeletal Superficial, Transcranial, Transrectal, Transvaginal, Transesophageal, Tissue biopsy, Intraoperative, IntraCardiac and Intraluminal.

The Vivid iq is a high-performance compact ultrasound system designed for cardiovascular and shared services applications. It offers an innovative ergonomic design, superb image quality, advanced connectivity, productivity tools and advanced technology. Compatibility with the Vivid product family offers flexibility in lab configuration and upgrade opportunities.

This FDA 510(k) summary for the GE Vivid iq ultrasound system (K181727) focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than performing a de novo study with specific acceptance criteria related to disease detection performance.

Therefore, the document does not report specific acceptance criteria or performance metrics for detecting or diagnosing conditions, as it is a clearance based on the device's technological characteristics and intended use being equivalent to already cleared devices.

Here's a breakdown of the information that is available based on your request, with the understanding that specific diagnostic performance metrics are not provided:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance (as applicable for this type of submission):

| Criterion Type | Acceptance Criteria (Internal/Regulatory Compliance) | Reported Device Performance (Demonstrated Compliance) |
|:-----------------------------|:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Safety and Effectiveness | Compliance with all relevant medical device safety standards (AAMI/ANSI ES60601-1, IEC60601-1-2, IEC60601-2-37, ISO10993-1, ISO14971, NEMA UD 2, NEMA DICOM Set). | The Vivid iq has been evaluated for acoustic output, biocompatibility, cleaning and disinfection effectiveness, thermal, electrical, electromagnetic, and mechanical safety and was found to comply with all applicable standards. Non-clinical verification testing covered system-level requirements and risk control measures. Non-clinical validation testing covered intended use, commercial claims, and usability with representative intended users. |
| Technological Equivalence| The device employs the same fundamental scientific technology as its predicate devices. Imaging capabilities, modes, and transducers are similar or identical to predicate devices. New features are cleared on other predicate devices. | The Vivid iq employs the same fundamental scientific technology as its predicate devices. It has identical imaging modes and transducers to its primary predicate (Vivid iq K161706). New features like 4D Markers, Tricefy Uplink, Qview, QuickApps, View-X, FlexiViews, Mitral Valve Quantification (MVQ), 4D AVQ, AFI, Auto EF, Cardiac AutoDoppler improvements, and Pediatric Z-score functionality are equivalent to those cleared in predicate devices such as Vivid E95 (K170823, K160078), Venue (K180599), and Vscan Extend (K161588). Transducer clinical application expansions are based on clearances from LOGIQ e (K151028), Vivid T8 (K160078), and LOGIQ P9/P7 (K163596). The system has similar capabilities in measurements, digital image capture, reviewing, and reporting. Materials are safe, and acoustic power levels are below FDA limits. |
| Intended Use Equivalence | The intended use of the Vivid iq system must be substantially equivalent to that of predicate devices. | The Vivid iq is intended for diagnostic ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body for cardiovascular and shared services applications, including Fetal, OB, Abdominal, Pediatric, small Organ, Neonatal Cephalic, Adult Cephalic, Cardiac, Peripheral Vascular, Musculo-skeletal Conventional, Musculo-skeletal Superficial, Transcranial, Transrectal, Transvaginal, Transesophageal, Tissue biopsy, Intraoperative, IntraCardiac and Intraluminal. This intended use is stated to be substantially equivalent to the predicate devices. |

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

• Sample Size for Test Set: Not explicitly stated as this was a 510(k) submission based on substantial equivalence, not a clinical trial proving diagnostic accuracy from scratch. The submission indicates "Non-Clinical validation testing covered the intended use and commercial claims as well as usability testing with representative intended users." This implies testing was done, but details on the size and nature of the "test set" for performance are not provided.
• Data Provenance: The document does not specify the country of origin for any non-clinical testing data. The submission relies heavily on demonstrating equivalence to predicate devices, which would mean leveraging the accepted performance of those existing devices. The testing mentioned (acoustic output, biocompatibility, etc.) would typically be performed by the manufacturer, GE Medical Systems Ultrasound and Primary Care Diagnostics, based in Wauwatosa, WI, USA, or their global affiliates. The context implies newly conducted non-clinical verification and validation, but not on a specific "dataset" from patients for diagnostic performance evaluation.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

• Not applicable/Not provided. The submission focuses on technical and safety equivalence. Ground truth for diagnostic performance is not established or reported as part of this 510(k) summary, as it relies on the predicate devices having already demonstated acceptable performance.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

• Not applicable/Not provided. Adjudication methods are typically relevant for clinical studies establishing diagnostic performance where human readers interpret outputs. This submission is for device clearance based on equivalence, not a clinical diagnostic performance study.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

• No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was described or performed. The document explicitly states: "The subject of this premarket submission, Vivid iq, did not require clinical studies to support substantial equivalence." This means no studies comparing human reader performance with or without AI assistance were conducted or reported in this submission. The new features mentioned are enhancements or integrations, not AI-driven diagnostic tools requiring such studies for this clearance.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

• Not applicable/Not done. This device is an ultrasound system with various imaging modes and features. It's not a standalone AI algorithm for automated diagnosis or detection. The features mentioned, like "QuickApps," "4D Markers," etc., are productivity tools or display enhancements, not algorithms that act independently for diagnostic purposes.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):

• Not applicable/Not provided in the context of diagnostic performance. For the safety and effectiveness evaluations, the "ground truth" would be the established safety standards and regulatory requirements. For functional testing of new features, it would be the expected technical behavior and output of the features.

8. The sample size for the training set:

• Not applicable/Not provided. This submission does not describe the development or training of an AI algorithm in the traditional sense that would require a dedicated training set of medical images for diagnostic tasks. The new features detailed are mostly related to image processing, workflow, and connectivity, not machine learning models trained on vast datasets.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

• Not applicable/Not provided, for the same reasons as point 8.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Vivid T9 / Vivid T8 is intended for ultrasound imaging, measurement and analysis of the human body for multiple clinical applications including: Fetal/OB, Abdominal, Pediatric, Small Organ, Cardiac, Peripheral Vascular, Adult Cephalic, Neonatal Cephalic, Musculosketal Superficial/Conventional, Transrectal, Transvaginal, Transesophageal, Intraoperative and Tissue Biopsy.

The Vivid T9 / Vivid T8 is a high performance digital ultrasound imaging system with total data management. The system provides image generation in 2D (B) Mode, Color Doppler, Power Doppler (Angio), M-Mode, Color M-Mode, PW and CW Doppler spectral, Tissue Velocity imaging, advanced Strain and Contrast applications. The fully digital architecture of the Vivid T9 / Vivid T8 unit allows optimal usage of all scanning modes and probe types, throughout the full spectrum of operating frequencies.

The document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification Submission for the GE Vivid T8 and Vivid T9 ultrasound systems. It primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices rather than proving performance against specific acceptance criteria through new clinical studies.

Based on the provided text, there are no specific acceptance criteria or a study detailed that directly proves the device meets such criteria in terms of diagnostic accuracy or effectiveness. Instead, the submission focuses on comparing the new device to predicate devices to establish substantial equivalence.

Here's a breakdown of the information that can be extracted, particularly in relation to the questions asked, even if direct answers for "acceptance criteria" and "study proving it" are not present:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
   Not applicable in the direct sense of a new study with explicit performance metrics against acceptance criteria. The document claims "performance is substantially equivalent to the predicate device(s)" based on similar technology, intended use, imaging capabilities, and safety/effectiveness. The performance comparison is implicitly tied to the cleared performance of the predicate device.

2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):
   The document states: "The subject of this premarket submission, Vivid T8 / Vivid T9, did not require clinical studies to support substantial equivalence." Therefore, no test set sample size, data provenance, or study type (retrospective/prospective) is provided for a new clinical performance study.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience):
   Since no new clinical studies were conducted to establish performance against ground truth, this information is not available in the document.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
   Not applicable, as no new clinical performance study was conducted.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
   Not applicable. This is a submission for a diagnostic ultrasound system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool. No MRMC study is mentioned.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
   Not applicable. This is not an algorithm-only device.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc):
   Not applicable, as no new clinical performance study was required. The "ground truth" for substantial equivalence is based on the previously established safety and effectiveness of the predicate devices.

8. The sample size for the training set:
   Not applicable for a clinical training set, as no new clinical studies were conducted. The device's "training" refers to its design and evaluation based on engineering principles and comparison to existing, cleared technologies.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
   Not applicable.

Summary of what the document focuses on instead:

The submission relies on demonstrating Substantial Equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices, primarily the Vivid T8 (K160078), Vivid E95 (K170823), Vivid iq (K161706), and Vscan Extend (K180995), along with other LOGIQ systems for specific transducer applications.

The key points for establishing substantial equivalence are:

• Intended Use: The Vivid T9 / Vivid T8 shares the same intended use as predicate devices: ultrasound imaging, measurement, and analysis of the human body for multiple clinical applications (Fetal/OB, Abdominal, Pediatric, Small Organ, Cardiac, Peripheral Vascular, Adult/Neonatal Cephalic, Musculoskeletal Superficial/Conventional, Transcranial, Transrectal, Transvaginal, Transesophageal, Intraoperative, and Tissue Biopsy).
• Technological Characteristics: The device employs the same fundamental scientific technology as its predicate devices.
• Imaging Modes: Identical imaging modes to the predicate Vivid T8 (K160078).
• Transducers: Similar transducers, with new additions (C1-5-RS and E8Cs-RS for Vivid T9) and expanded applications for existing transducers (e.g., Intraoperative for L8-18i-RS, and various clinical applications for 4C-RS, 8C-RS, 3Sc-RS, 6S-RS, 12S-RS, 9T-RS, L8-18i-RS, C1-5-RS, E8Cs-RS) that were cleared on other predicate systems.
• New Features: New features like Virtual convex, QuickApps, Cardiac AutoDoppler, Virtual Apex, Strain and Strain Rate, and Pediatric Z-score (expanded data) were cleared in predicate Vivid E95 (K170823). Tricefy Uplink was cleared with predicate Vscan Extend (K180995). Improvements were made to AFI and Auto EF, which were cleared on predicate Vivid T8 (K160078).
• Safety and Performance: The systems are manufactured with safe materials, have acoustic power levels below FDA limits, and comply with approved electrical and physical safety standards (AAMI/ANSI ES60601-1, IEC60601-1-2, IEC60601-2-37, ISO10993-1, NEMA UD 2, ISO14971, NEMA DICOM). Quality assurance measures (Risk Analysis, Requirements/Design Reviews, various levels of testing) are applied.

Conclusion: The document explicitly states that the device "did not require clinical studies to support substantial equivalence." This means that the acceptance criteria are largely met by demonstrating that the device is as safe and effective as existing, legally marketed ultrasound systems, based on an engineering and feature-by-feature comparison rather than a new clinical trial with specific performance metrics.

Ask a specific question about this device

The LOGIQ V5 Expert / LOGIQ V5 / LOGIQ V3 are general purposed ultrasound imaging and analysis systems providing digital acquisition, processing and display capability and clinical applications including: Abdominal, Obstetrical, Gynecological, Small parts, Vascular, Adult Cephalic, Pediatric, Musculoskeletal, Transcranial, Neonatal Cephalic, Transvaginal, Cardiac, Transrectal, and Tissue Biopsy/Fluid Drainage,

Intended Use: Ultrasound imaging, measurement and analysis of the human body as follows:

The LOGIQ V5 Expert / LOGIQ V5 / LOGIQ V3 are entry level ultrasound scanners from the LOGIQ family for private clinics focusing on OB/GYN. The systems are for general purpose imaging and analysis providing real-time digital acquisition, processing and display capability intended for general radiology imaging, evaluation with some cardiology and vascular applications, and providing guidance during tissue biopsy and fluid drainage procedures. The track 3 systems consist of a mobile console with keyboard control panel; color display and optional image storage, wireless capability, and printing devices. They utilize a variety of linear, curved linear and matrix phased array transducers. The systems have the same hardware and software but may have different options available.

The document is a 510(k) premarket notification for the GE Medical Systems Ultrasound and Primary Care Diagnostics LLC LOGIQ V5 Expert, LOGIQ V5, and LOGIQ V3 ultrasound systems.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document states that the LOGIQ V5 Expert / LOGIQ V5 / LOGIQ V3 systems comply with several voluntary standards for safety and performance. These standards serve as the acceptance criteria for the device. The reported device performance is that the systems meet these standards.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

The document explicitly states: "The subject of this premarket submission, LOGIQ V5 Expert / LOGIQ V5 / LOGIQ V3, did not require clinical studies to support substantial equivalence." This indicates that there was no specific clinical "test set" in the traditional sense, and therefore no associated sample size or data provenance from clinical testing for this specific submission. The majority of the comparisons are based on predicate devices and compliance with recognized standards.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications:

As no clinical studies were required, there were no experts used to establish ground truth for a clinical test set in this submission. The "ground truth" for demonstrating substantial equivalence relied on compliance with engineering and safety standards, and comparison to already cleared predicate devices.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

Not applicable, as no clinical test set was used for this submission.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:

Not applicable. The document explicitly states that clinical studies were not required. The submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices through technical comparisons and compliance with standards, not comparative effectiveness with human readers.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop) Performance:

This device is an ultrasound imaging system, which inherently involves a human operator (sonographer/clinician) to acquire and interpret the images. Therefore, the concept of "standalone performance" for an algorithm without human-in-the-loop is not applicable in the context of this device. The performance is tied to the integrated system and its ability to produce diagnostic quality images for human interpretation.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used:

The "ground truth" for demonstrating substantial equivalence in this submission is primarily based on:

• Compliance with recognized industry standards: (e.g., AAMI/ANSI ES 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-2-37, NEMA UD 3, ISO 10993-1, NEMA UD 2, ISO 14971, NEMA, PS 3.1 3.20).
• Technical comparison to predicate devices: Proving that the new device has the same or similar intended use, technology, probes, and performance as devices already cleared by the FDA.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set:

Not applicable. This is a medical imaging device, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a "training set" in the context of data-driven learning. The development process involved traditional engineering design, testing, and verification against specifications and standards.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

Not applicable, as there is no "training set" for this type of device. The verification and validation process involved:

• Risk Analysis
• Requirements Reviews
• Design Reviews
• Testing on unit level (Module verification)
• Integration testing (System verification)
• Performance testing (Verification)
• Safety testing (Verification)
• Simulated use Testing (Validation)

These measures aim to ensure the device performs according to its specifications and meets safety and efficacy requirements, derived from established engineering principles and regulatory standards.

Ask a specific question about this device

The device is intended for use by a qualified physician for ultrasound evaluation of Fetal; Abdominal; Pediatric; Small Organ (breast, testes, thyroid); Neonatal Cephalic; Cardiac (adult and pediatric); Peripheral Vascular; Musculo-skeletal Conventional and Superficial; Urology (including prostate); Transvaginal; and Intraoperative (abdominal, thoracic, vascular).

The LOGIQ P9 and LOGIQ P7 is a full featured, general purpose diagnostic ultrasound system which consists of a mobile console approximately 53 cm wide, 69 cm deep and 157 cm high that provides digital acquisition, processing and display capability. The user interface includes a computer keyboard, specialized controls, 10.4-inch LCD touch screen and color 21.5-inch LCD image display.

The provided text does not contain detailed acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria in the traditional sense of a clinical performance study for an AI/ML device.

Instead, the document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a diagnostic ultrasound system (GE LOGIQ P9 and LOGIQ P7) and its various transducers. The "study" described is a non-clinical comparison to predicate devices to establish substantial equivalence, rather than a clinical trial demonstrating performance against specific metrics.

Here's a breakdown of the information that can be extracted, and where limitations exist based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document does not present a table of specific quantitative acceptance criteria or reported performance metrics in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, or other performance measures typically associated with AI/ML devices.

Instead, the "acceptance criteria" are implied by the comparison to legally marketed predicate devices and compliance with voluntary safety and performance standards. The "reported device performance" is framed as its "substantial equivalence" to these predicates.

Implied Acceptance Criteria (based on comparison to predicate and standards):

• Intended Use Equivalence: Same clinical intended uses as predicate devices.
• Imaging Capabilities Equivalence: Same imaging modes and similar capabilities (measurements, digital image capture, reviewing/reporting).
• Technological Equivalence: Employs the same fundamental scientific technology as predicate devices.
• Safety Standards Compliance: Acoustic output below FDA limits, compliance with AAMI/ANSI ES60601-1, IEC60601-1-2, IEC60601-2-37, NEMA UD 3, NEMA UD 2, ISO10993-1, ISO14971, and NEMA PS 3.1 3.20 (DICOM).
• Biocompatibility: Transducer materials and other patient contact materials are biocompatible.
• Quality Assurance: Adherence to risk analysis, requirements reviews, design reviews, unit testing, integration testing, performance testing, and safety testing.

Reported Device Performance (as stated in the document):

The LOGIQ P9 and P7 systems are "substantially equivalent to the predicate devices with regard to intended use, imaging capabilities, technological characteristics and safety and effectiveness."

Specific new features or transducers are noted to be "previously cleared by FDA" on other GE Healthcare devices, implicitly demonstrating their performance was already deemed acceptable.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The document explicitly states: "The subject of this premarket submission, LOGIO P9 and LOGIO P7, did not require clinical studies to support substantial equivalence."

Therefore, there is no test set of patient data of a specific sample size used for performance evaluation in the context of an AI/ML study, nor is there information on data provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective). The substantiation is primarily based on engineering and performance testing against standards, and comparison to already cleared predicate devices.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

Since no clinical studies or test sets with patient data were required for this submission, there is no mention of experts used to establish ground truth for such a test set.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

As no clinical test set was required, there is no adjudication method described.

5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done or reported in this document. The device is a diagnostic ultrasound system, not explicitly an AI-assisted diagnostic tool, and the submission focuses on substantial equivalence to existing ultrasound devices.

6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable. This submission is for an ultrasound imaging system. While it includes "software features" like STIC and OmniView, and a "general measurement tool" called Cardiac AFI, these are presented as capabilities of the ultrasound system itself, not as standalone AI algorithms whose performance is evaluated independently. The primary focus is the imaging hardware and its integrated software relative to predicate ultrasound devices.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

For the new features or specific transducers mentioned as "previously cleared," their original submissions would have involved appropriate ground truth methods relevant to specific clinical applications (e.g., phantom studies for image quality, clinical data for specific measurements). However, for this specific 510(k) submission, since no new clinical studies were required, there is no ground truth established using patient data for the purpose of demonstrating performance of the LOGIQ P9/P7 as a complete system. The ground truth for proving safety and effectiveness here relies on compliance with engineering standards and demonstrated performance of predicate devices.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

Not applicable. This document describes a diagnostic ultrasound system, not an AI/ML algorithm that would undergo specific training on a data set.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

Not applicable. As there is no AI/ML training set explicitly discussed, the establishment of ground truth for such a set is not detailed.

Ask a specific question about this device