Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(191 days)
TOUAREG CloseFit™ UNP 2.75mmD implants are indicated to replace missing masticatory functional units (teeth) in single or multiple unit applications within the mandible or maxilla. For single-stage or two-stage procedures. For immediate implantation in extraction sites or implantation in partially healed or completely healed alveolar ridge situations. When an one-stage surgical is applied, the implant maybe immediately loaded when good primary stability is achieved and thefunctional load is appropriate.
The TOUAREG CloseFit™ UNP 2.75mmDDental Implant shall only be used to replace maxillary lateral incisors and mandibular lateral and central incisors.
The TOUAREG CloseFit™ UNP 2.75mmD spiral implant system is comprised of a tapered core implant with a spiral tap, with unique tip and triple lead thread design (3x1mm).
The TOUAREG CloseFit™ UNP 2.75mmD spiral implant system offers a unique, strong and solid conical-hex connection.
All Touareg CloseFit™ implants feature the OsseoFix™ surface treatment The TOUAREG CloseFit™ UNP 2.75mmD implant is provided with a diameter of 2.75mm and lengths of 10, 11, 13, 16 and 18 mm.
The TOUAREG CloseFit™ UNP 2.75mmD implants are two piece devices whereas the implant is to be used in combination with cover screws, healing abutments and abutments.
The TOUAREG CloseFit™ UNP 2.75mmD implants, abutments, and abutment fixation screw are made of Ti6AL4V ELI complying with standard ASTM F 136-08- Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) Alloy for Surgical Implant.
The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a dental implant device, the TOUAREG CloseFit™ UNP 2.75mmD. It describes the device, its intended use, and argues for its substantial equivalence to previously cleared devices.
Based on the information provided, the following can be extracted:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly state "acceptance criteria" in the traditional sense of performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) for an AI/CADe device. Instead, it demonstrates equivalence to predicate devices through non-clinical performance data (fatigue testing). The "performance" here refers to the device's mechanical integrity under simulated conditions.
Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Equivalence to predicate devices based on fatigue testing according to ISO 14801:2007 | Fatigue test was performed according to ISO 14801:2007 on the TOUAREG CloseFit™ UNP 2.75mmD dental implants and showed equivalence to the predicate devices. |
2. Sample Size for Test Set and Data Provenance
The document does not describe a "test set" in the context of evaluating an AI/CADe device. The performance evaluation is based on non-clinical fatigue testing of the physical dental implant device. The sample size for this physical testing is not specified.
Data provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is not applicable or provided, as this is laboratory testing of a manufactured medical device, not analysis of patient data.
3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth
This information is not applicable as the evaluation is not for an AI/CADe system requiring expert-established ground truth from medical images or clinical data. The judgment of "equivalence" is made by the FDA based on the submitted non-clinical test reports.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This information is not applicable as there is no "test set" requiring expert adjudication in the context of an AI/CADe device performance study.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
An MRMC study was not done. This section is not relevant as the device is a physical dental implant, not an AI/CADe system intended to assist human readers.
6. Standalone Performance Study (Algorithm Only)
A standalone performance study was not done. This section is not relevant as the device is a physical dental implant, not an AI algorithm.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for the device's performance is established by conformance to a recognized international standard (ISO 14801:2007 for fatigue testing) and comparison to predicate devices, demonstrating mechanical equivalence. There is no biological or pathological "ground truth" in the typical sense for an AI/CADe device.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not applicable. The device is a physical dental implant, not an AI algorithm that requires a training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
This information is not applicable. The device is a physical dental implant, not an AI algorithm.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1