Search Filters

Search Results

Found 3 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K211696
    Date Cleared
    2021-11-30

    (181 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4040
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K133070

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Disposable Surgical Face Masks are intended to be worn to protect both the patient and healthcare personnel from transfer of microorganisms, body fluids and particulate material. These face masks are intended for use in infection control practices to reduce the potential exposure to blood and body fluids. This is a single use, disposable device(s), provided non- sterile.

    Device Description

    The proposed device(s) are Blue color, and Flat Pleated type mask, utilizing Tie-On or Ear Loops way for wearing, and they all has Nose Piece design for fitting the face mask around the nose. The outer layer is blue, and the colorant material is identified as Phthalocyanine Blue , CAS number: 147-14-8. The proposed device(s) are manufactured with three layers. the inner and outer layers are made of spun-bond polypropylene, and the middle layer is made of melt blown polypropylene filter. The model of proposed device, tie-on, is held in place over the uers's mouth and nose by four ties welded to the face mask. The tie is made of spun-bond polypropylene. The model of proposed device, ear loops, is held in place over the uers's mouth and nose by two elastic ear loops welded to the facemask. The elastic ear loops are not made with natural rubber latex. The nose piece contained in the proposed device(s) is in the layers of facemask to allow the user to fit the facemask around their nose, which is made of malleable aluminum wire. The proposed device(s) are sold non-sterile and are intended to be single use, disposable device.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document primarily details the substantial equivalence determination for a Disposable Surgical Face Mask (K211696) to a predicate device (K133070). The acceptance criteria and "study" mentioned in the document refer to a series of non-clinical performance and biocompatibility tests conducted on the proposed device to demonstrate that it meets established standards for surgical masks, specifically ASTM F2100 Level 3 requirements.

    Here's the breakdown of the information as requested:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

    Test Methodology (Non-Clinical)Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance (Results)
    ASTM F2299-03 Standard Test Method for Determining the Initial Efficiency of Materials Used in Medical Face Masks to Penetration by Particulates Using Latex Spheres (Particulate Filtration Efficiency)≥98%≥ 99% (Passed for 3 lots)
    ASTM F1862-17 Standard Test Method For Resistance Of Medical Face Masks To Penetration By Synthetic Blood (Horizontal Projection Of Fixed Volume At A Known Velocity) (Fluid Resistance Performance)Level 3, No penetration at 160mmHgPassed at 160 mmHg (for 3 lots)
    ASTM F2101-19 Standard Test Method For Evaluating The Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (Bfe) Of Medical Face Mask Materials, Using A Biological Aerosol Of Staphylococcus Aureus. (Bacterial Filtration Efficiency)≥98%≥ 99% (Passed for 3 lots)
    Differential Pressure (Delta P) EN14683:2019, Annex C and ASTM F2100-19 (Breathability)
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K210023
    Date Cleared
    2021-04-02

    (88 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4040
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K133070

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Surgical Face Masks are intended to be worn to protect both the patient and healthcare personnel from transfer of microorganisms, body fluids and particulate material. These masks are intended for use in infection control practices to reduce the potential exposure to blood and body fluids. This is a single use ,disposable device(s), provided non-sterile.

    Device Description

    The proposed devices are three-layer, flat pleated masks. A Surgical Face Mask is composed of a mask body, a nose piece and two ear loops. The mask body is manufactured with three layers, the inner layer and the outer layer are made of spunbond polypropylene nonwoven fabric, and the middle layer is made of meltblown polypropylene nonwoven fabric. The model of proposed device, ear-loop, is held in place over the user's mouth and nose by two elastic ear loops welded to the mask body. The elastic ear loops are knitted elastic loops (made of polyester and spandex). The nose piece is in the layers of face mask to allow the user to fit the face mask around their nose, which is a steel wire with polyethylene covering. The proposed devices are provided non-sterile and are intended to be single use, disposable devices.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for a Surgical Face Mask. This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, primarily through non-clinical performance testing, rather than a clinical study establishing efficacy with defined acceptance criteria for AI/ML performance.

    Therefore, the information requested in the prompt regarding AI/ML device acceptance criteria, study design (test set, ground truth, experts, MRMC studies), and training set details cannot be found in this document. This document is for a physical medical device (surgical face mask) and not an AI/ML powered device.

    However, I can provide the acceptance criteria and study information for the physical properties and biocompatibility of the surgical face mask, which are the main performance aspects evaluated in this 510(k) submission.

    Here's the information based on the document provided, re-interpreting "acceptance criteria" and "study" in the context of a physical device:


    Acceptance Criteria and Study for the Surgical Face Mask (Physical Device)

    The device being evaluated is a Surgical Face Mask, for which the performance is assessed based on physical properties and biocompatibility, specified by recognized standards.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Performance TestAcceptance Criteria (Standard & Level)Reported Device Performance
    Fluid ResistanceMeet ASTM F1862 (Pass)Pass
    Particulate Filtration Efficiency (PFE)Meet ASTM F2299 (Pass)Pass
    Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (BFE)Meet ASTM F2101 (Pass)Pass
    Differential Pressure (Delta P)Meet EN 14683 Annex C (method specified in ASTM F2100-19) (Pass)Pass
    FlammabilityClass 1 (16 CFR Part 1610)Class 1
    In Vitro CytotoxicityNon-cytotoxic (ISO 10993-5)Non-cytotoxic
    Skin IrritationNon-irritating (ISO 10993-10)Non-irritating
    Skin SensitizationNon-sensitizing (ISO 10993-10)Non-sensitizing

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

    • Sample Size: The document does not explicitly state the numerical sample size for each performance test (e.g., how many masks were tested for BFE). It generally states that "the following performance tests have been conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of device."
    • Data Provenance: The tests were conducted on the "proposed device" (Guangdong Winsun Personal Care Products Co.,Ltd's Surgical Face Mask). The location where the testing was performed is not specified, but the applicant and contact persons are based in China. The data is retrospective in the sense that it was collected prior to the 510(k) submission.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    • This is not applicable as the "ground truth" for a physical device like a surgical mask is established by validated laboratory test methods performed according to international standards (e.g., ASTM, EN, ISO, CFR). It does not involve human expert consensus or adjudication in the way an AI/ML diagnostic device's ground truth would. The "experts" are the qualified laboratory personnel performing the standardized tests.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    • Not applicable. Performance is determined directly by objective measurements from standardized tests, not by human adjudication of interpretations.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    • Not applicable. This document is for a physical medical device (surgical face mask), not an AI/ML product. Therefore, no MRMC study, human readers, or AI assistance is relevant.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    • Not applicable. This document describes a physical medical device, not an algorithm.

    7. The type of ground truth used

    • The "ground truth" for this device's performance is defined by established international and national standards for physical and chemical properties (e.g., ASTM F2100-19, ASTM F1862, ASTM F2299, ASTM F2101, EN 14683, 16 CFR Part 1610, ISO 10993-5/10). Compliance with these standards through laboratory testing serves as the basis for demonstrating performance and safety.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    • Not applicable. This is a physical device, and there is no "training set" in the context of machine learning.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    • Not applicable. As there is no training set for a physical device, no ground truth was established in this context.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K202548
    Date Cleared
    2021-03-10

    (189 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4040
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K133070

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Surgical Face Masks are intended to be worn to protect both the patient and healthcare personnel from transfer of microorganisms, body fluids and particulate material. These mask are intended for use in infection control practices to reduce the potential exposure to blood and body fluids. This is a single use ,disposable device, provided non-sterile.

    Device Description

    The proposed devices are single use, three-layer, flat masks with ear loops and nose piece. The Surgical Face Masks are manufactured with three layers, the inner and outer layers are made of spun-bond polypropylene, and the middle layer is made of melt blown polypropylene filter. The proposed device, is held in place over the user's mouth and nose by two elastic ear loops welded to the face mask. The elastic ear loops are not made with natural rubber latex. The nose piece contained in the proposed device is in the layers of face mask to allow the user to fit the face mask around their nose, which is made of polypropylene with steel wire. The colorants used for mask are Copper phthalocyanine, Titanium dioxide and Polyethylene. The proposed devices are sold non-sterile and are intended to be single use, disposable devices. The proposed device including two models, WXDKZ0001 and WXDKZ0006, the difference is the color of the outer layer.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a Surgical Face Mask and focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device based on non-clinical bench testing and biocompatibility assessments, not on studies involving AI/ML models or human readers.

    Therefore, I cannot extract the information required by your prompt regarding acceptance criteria and studies proving an AI/ML device's performance, as the document describes a traditional medical device (face mask).

    The prompt's questions pertain to:

    1. AI/ML model acceptance criteria and performance.
    2. Sample sizes for test and training sets (implying data used for model development/validation).
    3. Expert ground truth establishment and adjudication (relevant for medical imaging AI).
    4. MRMC studies (relevant for AI-assisted human performance).
    5. Standalone AI performance.
    6. Type of ground truth (pathology, outcomes data, etc.).

    None of these concepts are discussed in the provided text, which details the physical and material characteristics, intended use, and performance standards (e.g., fluid resistance, filtration efficiency, flammability, biocompatibility) of a surgical face mask.

    The document explicitly states:

    • "No clinical tests were performed" (Section 9).
    • The tests mentioned are "Bench testing" and "Biocompatibility testing" of the physical mask.

    To accurately answer your request, you would need a document describing the regulatory submission for an AI/ML-driven medical device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1