Search Results

The Youjia unscented tampon with plastic applicators are inserted into the vagina and used to absorb menstrual and other vaginal discharge.

Youjia unscented tampon with plastic applicators are composed of an absorbent pledget (tampon), a withdrawal cord and an applicator. The pledgets have a cylindrical, bullet-like shape and the applicators have a smooth, rounded tip to ease insertion. These tampons are provided in three absorbencies: regular (6-9g), super, (9-12g), and super plus (12-15g). Each tampon is individually wrapped and packaged. The Youjia unscented tampon with plastic applicators are provided non-sterile and for single use only.

This document describes the FDA 510(k) clearance for the Youjia unscented tampon with plastic applicators. However, it does not contain the specific detailed acceptance criteria and study results in the format requested for an AI/device performance study. The document focuses on the substantial equivalence of tampons, which are physical medical devices, not AI software.

Therefore, many of the requested categories (e.g., sample size for test set, data provenance, number of experts, adjudication method, MRMC study, standalone performance, type of ground truth, training set size, how training ground truth was established) are not applicable or not provided in the context of this device because it's a physical product, not an AI algorithm.

Below, I will extract the information that is present and indicate where requested information is not applicable or not provided in this document.

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document states that "The sponsor completed performance testing consistent with the FDA guidance document: Menstrual Tampons and Pads: Information for Premarket Notification Submissions (510(k)s) issued on July 27, 2005." It also mentions "pre-defined acceptance criteria" for physical performance testing, but the actual specific criteria values and the reported device performance values are not detailed in this summary.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

This information is not provided. The document mentions "performance testing," but does not specify sample sizes or data provenance for these tests. It does state that the subject tampon is identical to tampons cleared under K122603, and the sponsor leveraged testing from that previous clearance, as well as biocompatibility data from K190218.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

Not applicable. This is a physical device, not an AI algorithm requiring expert ground truth for image/data interpretation.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

Not applicable. This is a physical device.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This is a physical device, not an AI algorithm.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable. This is a physical device.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

For biocompatibility, the ground truth is established by standard biological assays (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, systemic toxicity) and chemical extraction tests. For physical performance, the ground truth is against pre-defined physical specifications/criteria.

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable. This is a physical device, not an AI algorithm.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable. This is a physical device.

Ask a specific question about this device