Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K133617
    Device Name
    JAZZ SYSTEM
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2014-02-20

    (87 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3010
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K132287, K121541

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    JAZZ is a temporary implant to be used in orthopedic surgery. The JAZZ System is intended to provide temporary stabilization as a bone anchor during the development of solid bony fusion and aid in the repair of bone fractures.

    The indications for use include the following applications:

    • Spinal trauma surgery, used in sublaminar or facet wiring techniques;
    • Spinal reconstructive surgery, incorporated into constructs for the purpose of correction of spinal deformities such as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, adult scoliosis, kyphosis and spondylolisthesis;
    • Spinal degenerative surgery, as an adjunct to spinal fusions.

    The JAZZ System may also be used in conjunction with other medical implants made of titanium alloy whenever "wiring" may help secure the attachment of other implants. The JAZZ System is intended to be used with the Implanet Spine System.

    Device Description

    The Implanet JAZZ System is part of a spinal posterior fixation system that is designed to provide a stable interface between spinal constructs and the rod used in spinal surgery. The device is secured around vertebral structures such as the lamina, facet, or transverse processes from T1 to L5. The modified Jazz System is designed to function in the same manner as the cleared predicate device.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study details for the JAZZ System, based on the provided text:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance Criteria (Test Performed)Reported Device Performance
    Static perforation testingMet necessary specifications and functioned as intended.
    Static tear testing (using two different instruments)Met necessary specifications and functioned as intended.
    Manual perforation testingMet necessary specifications and functioned as intended.

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Sample Size: Not explicitly stated, but the document mentions "Four custom tests were performed to assess the minor manufacturing modification to the polyester braid distal tip." This implies a limited number of test units were used for each of the four tests.
    • Data Provenance: Not specified, but the testing was conducted for Implanet S.A., a French company. The document does not indicate if the testing was retrospective or prospective. Given it was for a modification, it was likely conducted specifically for this submission.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications

    • This information is not applicable as the study described is a bench test, not one involving human interpretation or clinical data. Therefore, there's no "ground truth" in the sense of expert consensus on medical findings.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    • None applicable. This was a bench test on a device component, not a study requiring adjudication of expert opinions.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

    • No. An MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. The submission focuses on bench testing a minor design modification to an existing device.

    6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Was Done

    • Not applicable. This device is a physical medical implant, not an AI/software algorithm.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    • For the bench testing, the "ground truth" was essentially the pre-defined engineering specifications and functional requirements for the polyester braid distal tip. The tests confirmed that the manufacturing process change met these required performance criteria.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    • Not applicable. This device is a physical medical implant, not an AI/software algorithm that requires a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    • Not applicable. No training set was used.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K132287
    Device Name
    JAZZ SYSTEM
    Date Cleared
    2013-09-25

    (64 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3010
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K121541

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    JAZZ is a temporary implant to be used in orthopedic surgery. The JAZZ system is intended to provide temporary stabilization as a bone anchor during the development of solid bony fusion and aid in the repair of bone fractures.

    The indications for use include the following applications:

    1. Spinal trauma surgery, used in sublaminar or facet wiring techniques;
    2. Spinal reconstructive surgery, incorporated into constructs for the purpose of correction of spinal deformities such as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, adult scoliosis, kyphosis and spondylolisthesis;
    3. Spinal degenerative surgery, as an adjunct to spinal fusions.

    The JAZZ System may also be used in conjunction with other medical implants made of titanium allov whenever "wiring" may help secure the attachment of other implants.

    The JAZZ System is intended to be used with the Implanet Spine System.

    Device Description

    The Implanet JAZZ System is part of a spinal posterior fixation system that is designed to provide a stable interface between spinal constructs and the rod used in spinal surgery. The device is secured around vertebral structures such as the lamina, facet, or transverse processes from T1 to L5.

    The JAZZ System consists of the following components and accessories: polyester (polyethylene-terephthalate) braid; titanium alloy connector and stainless steel malleable strip and buckle.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the acceptance criteria and study for the Implanet S.A.'s JAZZ System, structured according to your requested information:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The provided text describes the JAZZ System as a bone fixation cerclage used in spinal surgery. The performance data focuses on mechanical and biocompatibility testing. The acceptance criteria generally state that the product met "necessary specifications" and "functioned as intended." Specific quantitative acceptance criteria are not detailed in the document, nor are specific quantitative performance results for each test.

    Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Product "met the necessary specifications and functioned as intended" for various bench tests.Confirmed for Static Tensile Test (braid), Viscoelastic Characteristics (braid), Static Tensile Testing, Static Axial Compression Corpectomy Construct Testing, Dynamic Tension Testing, and Dynamic Axial Compression Corpectory Construct Testing.
    Sterilization and shelf life validation in accordance with recognized industry standards.Validated.
    Biocompatibility confirmed in accordance with ISO-10993.Confirmed.
    Modified JAZZ System satisfied acceptance criteria for dynamic axial compression corpectory construct.Satisfied.

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document does not specify the sample sizes used for the individual bench tests. It also does not explicitly state the provenance of the data (e.g., country of origin) or whether the tests were retrospective or prospective, although bench testing would inherently be prospective in nature.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications

    This information is not applicable to the provided document. The "ground truth" in this context refers to the results of engineering and biocompatibility tests, not clinical evaluations by human experts.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are used in clinical studies involving human interpretation or assessment, not for direct engineering bench testing.

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was mentioned. The document focuses on the mechanical and biocompatibility performance of the device itself, rather than its impact on human reader performance.

    6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study

    This concept is not applicable to an orthopedic implant like the JAZZ System. The device is a physical implant, not an algorithm. Therefore, "standalone performance" refers to its mechanical and biological characteristics, which were assessed through the described bench testing.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth used for performance evaluation was based on engineering specifications and established test methodologies for mechanical performance (e.g., tensile strength, compression resistance, viscoelastic characteristics, dynamic loading) and recognized industry standards (ISO-10993) for biocompatibility.

    8. Sample Size for the Training Set

    This information is not applicable. The JAZZ System is a physical implant, not an AI or machine learning model that requires a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    This information is not applicable, as there is no training set mentioned for this medical device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1