Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(63 days)
The device is intended for use by a trained physician in conjunction with the SonixGPS Needle Sensor to assist in vessel cannulation.
The SonixGPS™ Vascular Access Needle Kit includes: Vascular Access Needle: Disposable sterile vascular access needle Sensor Introducer: Disposable sterile sensor introducer into which the needle sensor (K111818) is inserted Cover: Disposable sterile cover provides a barrier to prevent transfer of microorganisms, body fluids and' particulate material to the reusable component.
The SonixGPS™ Vascular Access Needle Kit underwent performance testing to demonstrate its safety and effectiveness.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Applicable Standard | Test | Acceptance Criteria Met? |
---|---|---|
ISO 10993-5:2009 | Cytotoxicity | Yes |
ISO 10993-7:2008 | Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Residuals | Yes |
ISO 10993-10:2009 | Sensitization | Yes |
ISO 10993-10:2010 | Irritation or intracutaneous reactivity | Yes |
ISO 10993-11 | Systemic toxicity (acute) | Yes |
ASTM F756-08 | Hemolysis | Yes |
FDA guideline on | LAL Bacterial Endotoxins Testing | Yes |
USP 33:2010 | Bacterial Endotoxins Test | Yes |
ISO 11607-1:2006 & | Sterile Packaging Validation | Yes |
ISO 11607-2:2006 | ||
ISO 11135-1:2007 | ETO Sterilization Validation | Yes |
ISO 7864:1993 | Sterile Hypodermic Needles for Single Use | Yes |
ISO 9626:1991 | Stainless Steel Needle Tubing for | Yes |
ASTM F1140-07 | Standard Test Methods for Internal | Yes |
ASTM F1980-07 | Standard Guide for Accelerated Aging of | Yes |
ASTM F2096-04 | Standard Test Method for Detecting Gross | Yes |
ASTM F88-09/F88M-09 | Standard Test Method for Seal Strength of | Yes |
EN 556-1:2001+AC:2006 | Sterilization of medical devices - | Yes |
AAMI TIR 28:2009 | Product adoption and process equivalency | Yes |
ISO 14971:2007 | Medical devices - Application of risk | Yes |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document details performance testing for various aspects (biocompatibility, sterilization, packaging, mechanical) but does not specify the exact sample sizes for each test in the provided text. The provenance of the data is not explicitly stated in terms of country of origin or whether it was retrospective or prospective, beyond "Animal performance testing was conducted."
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
The document does not mention the use of experts to establish ground truth for the specific performance tests listed. These tests are primarily laboratory and standardized evaluations against pre-defined criteria.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
The document does not describe an adjudication method as it applies to human interpretation or decision-making on a test set. The performance tests are objective evaluations against established standards.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
No MRMC study was conducted or mentioned in the provided text. The device is a physical medical kit (needle, sensor introducer, cover), not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool for human readers.
6. Standalone Performance Study
The performance testing listed (biocompatibility, LAL, packaging, sterilization, mechanical) can be considered "standalone" in that they evaluate the device itself against established criteria, without requiring human interaction or interpretation beyond conducting the test and recording results. However, the animal performance testing was conducted to demonstrate the combined function of the SonixGPS™ Vascular Access Needle Kit with the Sonix Ultrasound Scanners and SonixGPS™ Needle Sensor. This implies an evaluation of the system as a whole, rather than the needle kit in strict isolation, in a functional setting.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
For the various performance tests (biocompatibility, sterilization, packaging, mechanical), the ground truth is established by the specified international standards and guidelines (e.g., ISO, ASTM, USP, FDA guidelines). For the "Animal performance testing," the ground truth was the observable function of the device in assisting vessel cannulation without impairing the function or raising new safety/effectiveness concerns.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
The document does not describe a "training set" in the context of an algorithm or machine learning. The device is a physical medical device kit and not an AI or software product that would typically undergo training.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable, as there is no mention of a training set for this device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(75 days)
The SonixTABLET Ultrasound Imaging System is intended for the following applications: Abdominal, Cardiac, Intraoperative Neurological, Fetal, Pediatric, Small Parts, Neonatal / Adult Cephalic, OB/GYN, Transesophageal, Transrectal, Transvaginal, Peripheral Vascular, Musculoskeletal conventional, Musculoskeletal superficial, Pelvic, Nerve block, Vascular Access, Transcranial.
The system also provides the ability to measure anatomical structures {fetal, abdominal, pediatric, small organ, cardiac, transvaginal, peripheral vessel, musculo-skeletal} and calculation packages that provide information to the clinician that may be used adjunctively with other medical data obtained by a physician for clinical diagnosis purposes.
The SonixTABLET Ultrasound Scanner is a new multi-purpose mobile, software controlled diagnostic ultrasound system with on-screen thermal and mechanical indices related to potential bio-effect mechanisms. Its function is to acquire primary or secondary harmonic ultrasound echo data and display it in B-Mode. Pulsed (PW) Doppler Mode. Continuous (CW) Doppler Mode, Color Doppler Mode, Amplitude Doppler Mode, a combination of modes, or Harmonic imaging on a Flat Panel Display. The user interface includes specialized controls, a minimized computer keyboard, and touch panel on an ergonomic console.
The system has an optional electrocardiography (ECG) display feature and support for a 3lead ECG cable assembly. The systems provide measurement capabilities for anatomical structures and fetal biometry that provide information used for clinical diagnostic purposes. The system has a PW and CW audio output feature and cine review, image zoom, labeling, biopsy, measurements and calculations, image storage and review, printing, and recording capabilities. The systems include a Digital Imaging and Communications (DICOM) module which enables storage.
The system is designed for use in linear, convex and phased arrav scanning modes, and supports linear, convex, microconvex and phased array probes.
The biopsy kits are accessories to the SonixTABLET Ultrasound Scanner. These accessories are made up of a polymeric bracket. There are features on the bracket that prevent the bracket from being oriented incorrectly when attached to the transducer. The brackets are not sterile and will be covered with a sterile sheath prior to use. These brackets are designed to accept and retain the needle guides in a mechanically secure way through the medium of the sterile sheath. The brackets are reusable. The needle guide is a separate sterile polymeric part that attaches to the bracket through a sterile sheath. The needle guides will support various sized needle guides are sold in sterile kits that contain multiple needle guides, sterile sheaths, ultrasound transmission gel, and bands.
The provided text is a 510(k) Summary for the SonixTABLET Ultrasound Scanner. It details the device's characteristics, intended uses, and its substantial equivalence to predicate devices. However, it does not contain information about acceptance criteria, device performance metrics, sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, number of experts for ground truth, adjudication methods, multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness studies, standalone performance studies, or the ground truth establishment for training sets.
Therefore, many parts of your request cannot be answered from the provided document.
The document focuses on demonstrating that the SonixTABLET Ultrasound Scanner is substantially equivalent to previously cleared predicate devices (Sonix Ultrasound Scanner (K093462), Sonix TOUCH Ultrasound Scanner (K083095), SONIX MDP Ultrasound Scanner (K080935)) in terms of intended use, principles of operation, and technological characteristics. This type of submission generally relies on demonstrating equivalence rather than conducting new performance studies with detailed acceptance criteria as would be expected for a novel device.
The "Safety considerations" section mentions compliance with standards related to acoustic output limits, but these are general safety standards, not performance acceptance criteria for diagnostic accuracy.
What can be extracted directly (or inferred) from the provided text:
- Device Name: SonixTABLET Ultrasound Scanner
- Predicate Devices: Sonix Ultrasound Scanner (K093462), Sonix TOUCH Ultrasound Scanner (K083095), SONIX MDP Ultrasound Scanner (K080935)
- Reason for Submission: New product clearance for SonixTABLET Ultrasound Scanner and supporting transducers, due to a name change request and new product clearance.
- Technological Characteristics: Substantially similar to predicate devices, using piezoelectric material, yielding real-time ultrasound images, and having similar modes (2D, PW Doppler, Color Flow Mapping Doppler, Power Doppler, Continuous Wave Doppler).
- Key Safety Standards: IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, AIUM AOL, AIUM RTD1-2004, UD-3 of NEMA, and FDA's 510(k) Diagnostic Ultrasound Guidance regarding acoustic output.
- Acoustic Output Limits (reported performance in relation to safety standards):
- ISPTA (d): 720mW/cm²
- TIS/TIB/TIC: 0.1 - 4.0 (Range)
- Mechanical Index (MI): 1.9 (Maximum)
- ISPPA (d): 0-700W/cm² (Range)
- These limits are stated to be the same as predicate Track 3 devices.
Summary of Information NOT found in the provided text:
- A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance (in terms of diagnostic accuracy/efficacy). The document focuses on performance relative to safety standards and equivalence to predicates, not specific diagnostic accuracy metrics.
- Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance.
- Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts.
- Adjudication method for the test set.
- If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, and the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance. (This device is an ultrasound scanner, not an AI or CADe/CADx device mentioned in this context.)
- If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done. (Again, not an AI device.)
- The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc).
- The sample size for the training set. (Not an AI device with a training set in the typical sense).
- How the ground truth for the training set was established. (Not an AI device with a training set in the typical sense).
Essentially, the provided document is a regulatory submission for substantial equivalence of an ultrasound device, which doesn't typically require the detailed performance study information you've requested for AI/CADx/CADe devices.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1