Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    Why did this record match?
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The S2000™ ultrasound imaging systems are intended for the following applications: Fetal, Abdominal. Intraoperative. Pediatric. Small Parts. Transcranial. OB/GYN. Cardiac, Pelvic, Neonatal/Adult Cephalic, Vasculoskeletal, Superficial Musculoskeletal, and Peripheral Vascular applications.

    The system also provides the ability to measure anatomical structures (fetal, abdominal, intraoperative, intraoperative neurological, pediatric, small organ, neonatal cephalic, adult cephalic, cardiac, trans-esophageal, transvaginal, peripheral vessel, musculoskeletal (conventional), musculo-skeletal (superficial) and neonatal cardiac} and calculation packages that provide information that provide information to the clinician that may be used adjunctively with other medical data obtained by a physician for clinical diagnosis purposes.

    The Arterial Health Package (AHP) software provides the physician with the capability to measure Intima Media Thickness and the option to reference normative tables that have been validated and published in peer-reviewed studies. The information is intended to provide the physician with an easily understood tool for communicating with patients regarding state of their cardiovascular system. This feature should be utilized according to the "ASE Consensus Statement: Use of Carotid Ultrasound to Identify Subclinical Vascular Disease and Evaluate Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Consensus Statement from the American Association of Echocardiography: Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force, Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Imaging".

    Device Description

    The Acuson S2000™ has been designed to meet the following product safety standards:

    • l UL 60601-1, Safety Requirements for Medical Equipment
    • l IEC 60601-2-37 Diagnostic Ultrasound Safety Standards
    • t CSA C22.2 No. 601-1, Safety Requirements for Medical Equipment
    • li AIUM/NEMA UD-3, Standard for Real Time Display of Thermal and Mechanical Acoustic Output Indices on Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment
    • I AIUM/NEMA UD-2, Acoustic Output Measurement Standard for Diagnostic Ultrasound
    • t 93/42/EEC Medical Devices Directive
    • Safety and EMC Requirements for Medical Equipment 트
      • . EN/IEC 60601-1
      • . EN/IEC 60601-1-1
      • I EN/IEC 60601-1-2
    • IEC 1157 Declaration of Acoustic Power 트
    • ISO 10993-1 Biocompatibility l
    AI/ML Overview

    This 510(k) submission (K093812) for the Siemens Acuson S2000 Ultrasound System describes the device's technical specifications and intended uses, and asserts substantial equivalence to a predicate device. However, it does not contain information regarding a specific clinical study with acceptance criteria and device performance metrics, as would be expected for a novel AI-powered diagnostic device.

    The document primarily focuses on:

    • Device Description: Listing safety standards the system meets (e.g., UL 60601-1, IEC 60601-2-37).
    • Intended Use: Broad applications for ultrasound imaging across various anatomical regions and patient populations.
    • Transducer Information: Detailed tables indicating the modes of operation (A, B, M, PWD, CWD, Color Doppler, Amplitude Doppler, Color Velocity Imaging) and additional features (e.g., tissue harmonic imaging, spatial compounding) cleared for each specific transducer.
    • Predicate Device: Stating the Acuson S2000 is substantially equivalent to the Acuson Antares Ultrasound System.

    The "Arterial Health Package (AHP) software," which provides "capability to measure Intima Media Thickness and the option to reference normative tables," mentions that these tables "have been validated and published in peer-reviewed studies." However, it does not provide details of an internal study conducted by Siemens to prove that their device's AHP functionality meets specific acceptance criteria based on these peer-reviewed studies.

    Therefore, I cannot populate the requested tables and information as a study proving device performance against acceptance criteria is not present in the provided text. The document is a regulatory submission for device clearance based on substantial equivalence, rather than a detailed report of a performance study.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1