Search Results

The AgaMatrix Health Manager is intended for single patient use. It is an accessory to blood glucose monitoring systems to assist in the review, analysis and evaluation of glucose results to aid in diabetes and health management. The AgaMatrix Health Manager collects data from AgaMatrix manufactured glucose meters and allows adding, editing, and viewing additional health data. The AgaMatrix Health Manager is not intended to provide automated treatment guidance or decisions, nor is it to be used as a substitute for professional healthcare advice.

The AgaMatrix Health Manager (app) is an optional software accessory for blood glucose meters manufactured by AgaMatrix. It is a digital logbook and diabetes tool designed to operate using an iPhone or iPod touch. An individual can manually enter blood glucose readings or can download readings directly to the app installed on an iPhone or iPod touch from the AgaMatrix meter by using the AgaMatrix Cable to connect the meter to the connector of the iPhone or iPod touch. The app will allow the user to manually enter carbohydrate, insulin, and weight information. Users will have the ability to have their data from the AgaMatrix Health Manager automatically uploaded to the AgaMatrix Health Manager cloud portal for back-up. The cloud portal will enable access to the health information in a web browser. Users will have the ability to create and edit their profile, set goals, and download their information as a .csv file.

The AgaMatrix Health Manager (app) is an optional software accessory for blood glucose meters manufactured by AgaMatrix. It functions as a digital logbook and diabetes tool designed to operate using an iPhone or iPod touch. Users can manually enter blood glucose readings or download readings directly from an AgaMatrix meter via a connecting cable. The app also allows for manual entry of carbohydrate, insulin, and weight information. Data can be automatically uploaded to the AgaMatrix Health Manager cloud portal for backup and web browser access, enabling users to create/edit profiles, set goals, and download data as a .csv file. This device is intended for use in the home to aid individuals with diabetes and their healthcare professionals in reviewing, analyzing, and evaluating blood glucose test results to support effective diabetes management. It is not intended to provide automated treatment guidance or decisions, nor to substitute for professional healthcare judgment.

Here's the breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

• Sample Size: The document does not explicitly state a specific numerical sample size for the usability study participants. It generally refers to "Users."
• Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, though the context of an FDA submission for a US market suggests the study was likely conducted in the USA. The study appears to be prospective as it involved users actively performing tasks with the device during the study.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts:

• This information is not provided in the document. The "ground truth" for data accuracy was established by user confirmation (meter to app) and study evaluators' confirmation (app to cloud). The qualifications of these evaluators are not mentioned.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

• The document describes a method of confirmation rather than an adjudication method. For the meter-to-app data transmission, "Users had to confirm that 100% of the readings downloaded." For the app-to-cloud data transmission, "study evaluators confirmed that 100% of the readings uploaded." There is no mention of a multi-reader or multi-reviewer adjudication process.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve With AI vs Without AI Assistance:

• No, a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. This device is a data management software, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool requiring human interpretation comparison.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done:

• The study described focuses on the usability and data integrity of the software when used by an "intended population" (i.e., human users). It specifically tests aspects like data transmission from a physical meter to the app, and from the app to a cloud portal, which inherently involves the human user interacting with the system. While the "accuracy" figures refer to the software's ability to transfer data correctly, the overall evaluation is of the human-in-the-loop performance for these tasks rather than a purely standalone algorithm's performance on a dataset.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:

• The ground truth for the test set was based on direct comparison and confirmation:
  • For meter-to-application data transmission: User confirmation that 100% of readings downloaded.
  • For application-to-cloud data transmission: Study evaluator confirmation that 100% of readings uploaded, comparing downloaded CSV files.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:

• This information is not provided. The AgaMatrix Health Manager is described as software, and the document focuses on its verification and validation testing, not on a machine learning model that would typically require a training set. If there were any internal development and testing, details about such a "training set" are not disclosed here.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

• Not applicable, as details about a training set for a machine learning model are not provided or implied by the information given.

Ask a specific question about this device